Abstract
The antifungals that are in current clinical practice have a high occurrence of a side effect and multidrug resistance (MDR). Researchers across the globe are trying to develop a suitable antifungal that has minimum side effect as well as no MDR issues. Due to serious undesired effects connected with individual antifungals, it is now necessary to introduce novel and effective drugs having numerous potentials to regulate complex therapeutic targets of several fungal infections simultaneously. Thus, by taking a lead from this subject, synthesis of potent antifungals from coumarin moiety could contribute to the development of promising antifungal. Its resemblance and structural diversity make it possible to produce an auspicious antifungal candidate. Due to the natural origin of coumarin, its presence in diversity, and their broad spectrum of pharmacological activities, it secures an important place for the researcher to investigate and develop it as a promising antifungal in future. This manuscript discusses the bioavailability of coumarin (natural secondary metabolic molecule) that has privileged scaffold for many mycologists to develop it as a broad-spectrum antifungal against several opportunistic mycoses. As a result, several different kinds of coumarin derivatives were synthesized and their antifungal properties were evaluated. This review compiles various coumarin derivatives broadly investigated for antifungal activities to understand its current status and future therapeutic scope in antifungal therapy.
Graphic abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Most of the severe fungal infections in human are caused by three main fungal species, i.e., Candida, Cryptococcus, and Aspergillus [1,2,3,4]. To establish fungal infection in host, there are four different criteria, i.e., pathogen (a) must be capable of reproducing at or above 37 °C, (b) must be able to enter into specific host tissue by diffusing host tissue barrier, (c) must be able to concentrate and engulf ingredients of human tissue, and (d) must be capable standing firm with the human immune system [5]. The coumarin (2H-1-benzopyran-2-one) was first isolated from a plant species Coumarouna odorata. It is a hetero-compound known as benzopyrone containing benzene and α-pyrone rings. Mostly these compounds are distinguished in several families of plants, fungi, and bacteria [6, 7]. More than 1300 coumarin compounds were found, and several coumarin derivatives were synthesized as they have six different transposition sites available [8]. Based on in vivo experiments in rats, coumarins are banned from the food market by the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA), USA, in 1954 because it was producing hepatotoxicity in rats. The hepatotoxicity of coumarin is species-dependent and not toxic in other species like mice, hamsters, and gerbils [9]. Among all natural compounds, coumarins include a great assortment of bioactivities containing anticoagulant, estrogenic, dermal photosensitizing, antimicrobial, vasodilator, molluscicidal, anthelmintic, sedative, hypnotic, analgesic, and hypothermic activities [10,11,12]. In addition to these properties, coumarin compounds are also used as cosmetics and additives in food products (due to its sweet flavor) [13]. From Cyperus incompletus, different kinds of coumarins are isolated and purified and its antifungal assays demonstrated that it has essential actions against fungus due to an extra oxygenated functional group and/or an aromatic hydroxyl group (ether and ester) in 6 and 7 positions of coumarin [14]. This review describes coumarin and its derivatives as a promising antifungal moiety. We have discussed human fungal pathogens, their pathogenicity, mechanism of fungal parasitism, drawbacks of available antifungals, antifungal activity of coumarins, and its derivatives for its possible development of antifungal having multiple-drug-targeting potential.
Human fungal pathogens
In humans, mostly fungal infections arise from the epidermal part of the skin or mucosal surface, and then, infection becomes invasive to the internal organs. Though superficial infections are easy to diagnose, the incidence and severity of internal infections (interior structural and functional unit of a human) are high. Immunodeficient persons with HIV/AIDS, autoimmune disease patients, and patients under organ transplantation and chemotherapy treatment are always under high threat from fungal infection [15]. Among 1.5–5.0 million species of fungus on the universe [16], only few hundred fungal species are the causal agent of a disease in human beings and very limited are able to infect the healthy people [17]. In immunocompromised patients, the causal agent of fungal infection is C. albicans, C. neoformans, A. fumigatus, H. capsulatum, etc. in which C. albicans survive within the host acting as commensalism, and later on, C. albicans becomes an opportunistic organism for fungal infections [18]. Some diseases caused by these fungi are aspergillosis, coccidioidomycosis, candidosis, cryptococcosis, mycetomas, histoplasmosis, mucormycosis, and paracoccidioidomycosis. These diseases are very devastating to human beings if they are not diagnosed properly [19]. In the host, these fungi create allergic reactions to fungal proteins or toxic reactions of fungal toxins and ultimately fungus establish superficial, cutaneous, subcutaneous, or systemic infections [20].
Cutaneous fungal pathogen
Normally fungal colonization occurs in different body parts of humans with unique physiological and immunological niche by the exposed interface to the outside which provides optimized incubation period like moisture, nutrients, and temperature for the development of suitable microorganism even in healthy people [21, 22]. The cutaneous microbiota is associated with the dermis and pilosebaceous unit of the hair follicle. They are recognized as dermatophytes which are the causal agent of skin mycoses [23,24,25]. The fungal infections are also persistent in epidermis and nails and affect 20–25% of the universe population. The spectrum of superficial infection depends on the geographical area and location, and some opportunistic species like Microsporum canis, T. violaceum, M. audouinii, T. soudanense, and T. tonsurans [26] were reported. Several microorganisms are an essential part of the host–microbiota system, and they survive unaggressively with their host (e.g., C. albicans and S. aureus) and causes cutaneous infection [27, 28]. The cutaneous infection was mostly caused by species of Candida like C. orthopsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, and C. albicans [29, 30]. Thickening of the epidermis, hyperkeratosis, and erythema are a habitual indication of cutaneous candidiasis [31]. In fact, superficial infection is encountered by some Alternaria spp. and causes cutaneous and subcutaneous alternariosis [32,33,34]. Cutaneous fungal infection in neonates shows a high jeopardize because of the maturation of skin after the first few weeks to months of life by the keratinization process. However, the epidermis avoids the loss of water and allows a barrier to invasion by opportunistic fungus [35,36,37,38].
Mucocutaneous fungal pathogen
Due to the poor clinical setup and unavailability of advanced therapy and antifungal resistance, fungal infection becomes very grievous to our society. Due to its pathogenicity, mucosal-acquired fungal infections have high susceptibility and mortality. The number of mucocutaneous infections is seen in universe in immune-suppressed patients [39]. The chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis syndrome (multiple superficial sites particularly mouth, epidermis, and finger nails) is the most frequent type of infection caused by opportunistic dermatophytes candida by colonizing the various mucosal barriers like the esophagus, genitourinary tract, and oral cavity [40, 41]. The mucocutaneous candidiasis occurs to individuals symbiotically and damages the mucosal barrier by secreting numerous factors (toxins and hydrolytic enzymes) and acquiring nutrients [42].
Systemic fungal pathogen
In the case of human tissue, the invasion of the total body part demonstrates systemic fungal infection and shows initial infection, histoplasmosis, and coccidioidomycosis. Generally, the etiology of systemic fungal infection is of two types: (a) endemic mycoses (caused by dimorphic fungi like Blastomyces dermatitidis, Histoplasma duboisii, Coccidioides immitis, Penicillium marneffei, and Sporothrix schenckii) and (b) opportunistic mycoses (caused by Candida, Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, and Zygomycetes) [43,44,45,46]. However, C. albicans is a highly opportunistic pathogen causing the nosocomial fungal infections and they are growing in the number of immunocompromised patients isolated from intensive care unit (ICU) [47].
Pathogenicity of the fungal pathogen
The name pathogenesis comes from two Greek words, i.e., “pathos” means disease and “genesis” means development. A fungus which is responsible for causing disease in the host is known as a pathogenic fungus [48]. A human pathogenic fungus has the capability to invade the human tissue mostly in immunocompromised person and generate a life-threatening disorder via expressing some virulent factors (Table 1). However, the contribution of specific genes and their respective products (proteins) shows tissue invasions in the individuals [48, 49]. Furthermore, several characters such as expression of adhesion molecule, morphological dimorphism, alternation of phenotypic character, producing biofilm, and secretion of several hydrolytic enzymes are deliberate in virulence [50]. Usually, for the pathogenicity, the elongated hyphae or pseudohyphae of fungi plays a significant role in the deep incision of tissue [51].
Mechanism of parasitism
During the host-mycoses interrelationship, a cross-talk mechanism reveals the systemic infection. The biological interpretation in a host–pathogen interaction involves several crucial steps like (a) attachment to host membrane followed by multiplication, (b) tissue invasion of the host, and (c) dissemination [52].
Adherence and proliferation
In the initial step of pathogenicity, yeast budding cells adapt the epidermal part of the host and believe to be a primary virulence factor. Most neonates become a suitable substrate for several fungal pathogens during the gestation period and colonize into the gastrointestinal tract as well as the oral cavity of an infant [51, 53]. The adherence of pathogen to the superficial part of the individual provides particular adhesins present in fungal cells to determine ligands such as fibronectin, proteins, and fibrinogen [54]. Mostly fungal pathogens are attached to the host epithelial cell, and they are immediately taken up by the epithelial cells [55]. For the multiplication and formation of hyphal and/or pseudohyphae, fungus required a suitable environmental niche in the host [56]. For the survival of pathogen at various types of niche in host tissue, the propagation of pathogen is able to accommodate with huge alternation of host environmental pH of different tissue sites and maintains its virulence. They regulate some cell signaling pathways which are involved in the pH of the host environment [57, 58].
Tissue invasion and dissemination
The contagious disease is caused by several mycoses in the human by manipulating host immune response. A number of pathogenic fungal cells get entered into mammalian cells and manipulate the mammalian immune system. The process of evading host cell (both phagocytic and non-phagocytic cells) allows the pathogen to travel across the cell membrane. Several opportunistic fungal species enter into the host cells either in vitro or in vivo, but the invasion process is described for some fewer species [59,60,61,62,63]. Invasion of pulmonary epithelial and endothelial cells by pathogen gains the profit for mycoses, and mostly the internalization of mammalian tissue become a nutrient source for their survival [64]. The most common fungal infections—aspergillosis and candidiasis—are induced by two fungi: C. albicans and A. fumigatus that exert few initial processes in which they can move from one cellular environment to another environment inside the mammalian body. The primary mechanism is to induce endocytosis in which the specific fungal proteins are deposited on the cell surface which interferes with host ligand binding, thereby initializing the engulfment of fungal hyphae by the mammalian cell. The secondary mechanism is the active penetration of fungal viable cell into the host cell. The evidence showed the process of active penetration mediated by significant enzyme SAPs (secreting aspartic proteases) [65,66,67,68,69]. Pathogenic fungus like C. neoformans disseminates from lungs through the induced endocytosis, but C. neoformans have substitute pathway of translocating from an individual cell. They have capable of altering the host cell environment and germinate until the breaking of host tissue and ejected from the tissue through exocytosis [70, 71].
Available antifungal drugs: mechanism and drawbacks
For the diagnosis of cutaneous, mucocutaneous, and systemic mycoses, there are few antifungal drugs available (Fig. 1) which can target/inhibit the fungal infection [20]. Consequently, this antimycotic agent demonstrated a change in the pattern of differentiation, transformation, growth, and viability of mycosis (Table 2). We have briefly discussed the pros and cons of existing antifungals below.
Azole group of antifungals
The azole group of antifungals is the synthetic mycotic agent first reported for the diagnosis of systemic and mucocutaneous dermatophytes in early 1960s [72, 73]. The five-membered heterocyclic structure imidazole shows their broad-spectrum antifungal activities based on the organic synthesis of the new compound through modification of the molecular structure. For instance, pyrazoles are most significant heterocyclic compounds that can be selectively lithiated at different carbons and afterward react with an electrophile to show antifungal properties [74,75,76,77]. The action of these azole groups of antifungals inhibits the addition of methylated sterols and demolishes the mixture of the lipid bilayer. At higher concentration of azole group of antifungals, few imidazoles exert direct inhibitory action upon dynamic nature of membrane without interfering with sterols and sterol esters [78,79,80]. Recently synthesized benzimidazole salts were tested for their inhibitory property against C. albicans and A. fumigates which reveals that reduction in population and also these derived salts are used as an inhibitor against acetylcholine esterase and carbonic esterase of fungus [81,82,83,84]. Depending upon the presence of nitrogen group (miconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, terconazole, posaconazole, and fluconazole) in five-membered azole ring, antifungal azoles are sorted as triazoles and imidazole and mostly used against filamentous fungi and yeast. For the reduction in mycotic growth, azole drugs first attack the ergosterol biosynthetic pathway [72, 85, 86]. This drug inhibits the synthesis of a lanosterol-14α-demethylase enzyme in dermatophytes [87]. Besides Pythium spp. and Pneumocystis spp., the ERG11 gene is responsible for 14α-demethylase enzyme (under cytochrome P450 enzymes) production in all mycoses involved in secretion of ergosterol which is required for cell membrane formation. The blocking of 14α-demethylase enzyme reveals the disturbances in cell membrane rigidity, formation chitin, cell membrane permeability, and nutrient transport channel [88, 89].
Polyene group of antifungals
The most opportunistic genus of Streptomyces bacteria produces broad-spectrum antifungal drugs such as polyenes (nystatin, amphotericin B, natamycin) by fermentation and now taken as topical drugs [90]. The first antifungal drug nystatin was biosynthesized in Streptomyces noursei at the Division of Laboratories and Research, New York State Department of Health [91]. Nystatin is more toxic for human cells in in vitro as well as in vivo experiments. So, mostly in systemic infection diagnosis is made intravenously [92]. Like the structure of macrolides, polyenes have also both properties of hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity. Generally, the composition of polyene is 20–40 cyclic rings coupled with the d-mycosamine group. The existence of amphiphilic properties of polyene is due to the availability of double bonds, saturated and unsaturated carbon atom, and few hydroxyl groups on their respective terminal sides [93]. Fungal cell membrane plays an important role in cell survivability by maintaining their integrity. The accumulation of polyene targets ergosterol (an integral part of the cell membrane) and creates pores in the membrane of fungus that results in exhaustion of all cellular components and the release of cytoplasmic content [94]. Nephrotoxicity is a major drawback by taking amphotericin B due to its affinity toward sterol compound (cholesterol presence in mammals) [95].
Echinocandin group of antifungals
Echinocandins are a modern antifungal agent because it has few side effects due to their less toxicity and nephrotoxicity in comparison with other antifungals. The first echinocandin—cilofungin—was discovered for the treatment of most fungal infection, but after the experimental analysis of cilofungin exposed its toxicity, this drug was avoided [96]. After that, some novel echinocandins (i.e., caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin) were developed that presented their high incidence of clinical development in the twentieth century and approved by the FDA and USA and also followed by European Agency. Echinocandins are large semisynthetic lipopeptide compound having amphiphilic cyclic hexapeptide with N-linked long fatty acid chain [90, 97]. In most of the mycoses, β(1-3)-glucan synthase catalyzes the polymerization of uridine diphosphate glucose to β(1-3)-glucan which was treated as one of the most important structural components for the protection of fungal cell wall. However, the echinocandin group of antifungal drugs blocks the synthesis of β(1-3)-glucan by breaking the cell wall and leads to the cell wall destabilization [98, 99]. Since this group of antifungal drugs has high molecular weight and gets assimilated into the gastrointestinal tract, therefore, this kind of drugs is given via a vein [100].
Nucleoside analogs group of antifungals
5-Fluorocytosine is a cytosine derivative first introduced in 1957. Cytosine permeases are enzyme selectively transmit 5-fluorocytosine through the cell wall of few fungi. These drugs stop the DNA synthesis by targeting 5-fluorouracil and then exchanged with 5-fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate by the process of phosphorylation [101]. For further enhancement of the drugable property, 5-fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate can be re-phosphorylated which interferes with protein synthesis inhibition [102].
Other group of antifungals
Squalene epoxidase is the most common enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of ergosterol in most of the fungi. Accumulation of both thiocarbamate and allylamine groups of antifungal agent suppresses the squalene epoxidase leading into the depletion of ergosterol level [103]. The most commonly available allylamine drugs for therapeutic purpose are terbinafine and naftifine [104]. Morpholines is a fungicidal drug that represses expression of ERG2 and ERG24 gene catalyzes to sterol D14 reductase and D7-D8 reductase, respectively [105, 106].
Coumarin and its derivatives
Coumarin is a secondary metabolite of phenolic substances found in the plants and exhibits a wide range of antimicrobial activities [107, 108]. The presence coumarin moiety is found mostly in the plants of Guttiferae, Oleaceae, Apiaceae, Umbelliferae, Caprifoliaceae, Clusiaceae, Rutaceae, and Nyctaginaceae families [109]. The first coumarin was synthesized by following the mechanism of the Perkin reaction between salicylaldehyde and acetic anhydride in nineteenth century (Fig. 2) [110]. These heterocyclic phenolic substances (coumarin) have diverse activity like antiinflammatory [111], anticoagulant [112], antibacterial [113], antifungal [114], antiviral [115], antihypertensive [116], antitubercular [117], anticonvulsant [118], and antioxidant [119]. Four different types of coumarin are categorized according to their structure, i.e., the simple coumarins, furanocoumarins, pyranocoumarins and the pyrone-substituted coumarins [120, 121]. All the subclasses of coumarins are obtained by the biosynthesis of coumarin through the shikimic acid pathway. This coumarin biosynthesis is only possible by yielding umbelliferone compound via cinnamic acid through a metabolic pathway of phenylamine. In this process, phenylalanine ammonium lyase is an enzyme that deaminates the l-phenylalanine by generating trans-cinnamic acid (Fig. 2). The process involves the production of 2,4-hydroxycinnamic acid by two important catalysts such as cinnamate 2′-hydroxylase and cinnamate 4′-hydroxylase through hydroxylation of trans-cinnamic acid. To produce novel coumarins (umbelliferone, esculetin, and scopoletin), prominent chain isomerization and consequent lactonization processes were used [121, 122]. Not only is biosynthesis of coumarin confined to the plants, but also several microorganisms like fungi and bacteria have a specific metabolic pathway to biosynthesize coumarin compound [123].
The coumarins have a simple structure, and its versatility makes it very significant for broad-spectrum application [124] such as in agrochemical [125], pharmaceuticals [126], cosmetic industry [127], fragrance industry [128], and food industries [129]. Due to a wide range of biological activities, coumarins show very significant activity in combinatorial library synthesis [130]. Table 3 elucidates the synthesis and biological behavior of coumarin derivative compound. Also, the substituent of the coumarin utilizes for the diagnosis of degenerative brain disorders like Parkinson’s and Alzheimer diseases by blocking cholinesterase [131, 132]. Several other methods were also developed for the synthesis of coumarins like Pechmann reaction [133], Knoevenagel condensation [134], Witting reaction [135], and Claisen rearrangement [136] using comprehensive chemical agents like P2O5, H2SO4, ionic liquids, HCLO4, and catalyst [137,138,139,140,141,142].
Antifungal activity of coumarins
The predominant application of available antifungal agent leads to the resistance of endangered dermatophytes. Also, the majority of the resistance mechanisms have elucidated at the molecular level for the fungal pathogens. So it is now developing to discover novel antifungal agent which achieves better therapeutic efficacy against pathogenic fungus [143]. Coumarin and its derivatives showed extensive pharmacological activity and considered as an antimicrobial agent due to its lower degree of cytotoxicity, less cost, and wide availability as a secondary metabolite in many plants [107, 108, 144].
Fungistatic activity
Mercer et al. suggested the introduction of water-soluble coumarin glycosides that have a tendency to convert inactive to an active drug by secreting β-glucosidase in mycoses. It hydrolyzes the pro-drug via producing potential antifungal aglycones like esculetin and fraxetin [145]. Guerra et al. demonstrate that a novel coumarin derivative 4-acetatecoumarin represents the subsequent reduction in hyphal formation, as well as spore formation in Aspergillus spp. During conglomeration with azole group antifungals, it gave the evidence for inhibition of fungal growth [146]. Puttaraju et al. synthesized novel coumarin derivative by microwave irradiation method. One coumarin compound dihydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[1,2-α]pyrimidine-4-one showed an exhibition of effective antifungal activity against C. albicans, A. niger, A. fumigatus, A. flavus, F. oxysporum, P. chrysogenum [147]. Marcondes et al. isolated mammeisin from Kielmeyera elata species of plant and tested its antifungal activity against various Candida spp. They detected that antifungal drug mammeisin demonstrates good activity for C. tropicalis as compared to fluconazole [148]. Umbelliferone, herniarin, scopoletin, and xanthotoxin were isolated from few herbal plants (originated in Finland) and examined its fungistatic activity against Fusarium culmorum. The antifungal activity of these coumarins indicated that the rate of growth of F. culmorum was suppressed vigorously [149].
Fungicidal activity
Thati et al. describe the mechanism of action of some coumarin derivatives like 7-hydroxycoumarin-3-carboxylatosilver(I), 6-hydroxycoumarin-3-carboxylatosilver(I), and 4-oxy-3-nitrocoumarinbis(1,10-phenanthroline) silver(I) against an opportunistic yeast C. albicans and observe the death of C. albicans. Application of these potent coumarin derivatives reduced the efficacy of respiration system due to breakage of cytochrome synthesis in mitochondria, lower synthesis of ergosterol, and cell death by induction of apoptosis, and these are the manifestation for strong fungicidal activity [150]. Also, the antifungal activity of naturally occurring coumarin derivative osthole was considered as a potent antifungal drug due to its direct effect on cell wall modification and disruption of organelles that leads to the death of Sphaerotheca fuliginea [114]. Four osthole derivatives such as 7-allyloxy-3-methyl-4-oxo-4H-furo[3,2-c]chromene-2-carboxylic acid methyl ester, 2-acetyl-7-methoxy-furo[3,2-c]chromen-4-one, 7-methoxy-3-phenyl-furo[3,2-c]chromen-4-one, and 7-allyloxy-3-phenyl-furo[3,2-c]chromen-4-one were derived through microwave-assisted protocol by Zhang et al. Among these coumarin derivatives, the EC50 value of compound 7-allyloxy-3-methyl-4-oxo-4H-furo[3,2-c]chromene-2-carboxylic acid methyl ester showed better fungicidal activity rather than a standard antifungal drug. Azoxystrobin showed strong activity against common plant fungal pathogens, i.e., Rhizoctorzia solani, Colletotrichum capsici, and Botrytis cinerea [151]. Siddiqui et al. synthesize novel 4-hydroxycoumarin derivatives, i.e., 1-(4-oxo-4H-1-benzopyran-3-yl)-1,1-bis(4-hydroxy-1-benzopyran-2-one-3-yl)methane that indicated a good fungicidal activity against pathogenic fungi T. mentagrophytes, P. marneffei, A. fumigates, and C. albicans [152].
Activity against fungal hyphae
Dietrich and Valio reported the biological activities of coumarin and its derivatives against various taxonomies of fungi such as Phycomycetes, Ascomycetes, and Basidiomycetes [153]. They showed predominant inhibition of mycelial growth at a constant concentration of coumarin. Knypl (1963) reported that coumarin at a higher concentration showed suppression of spore maturation in case of A. niger [154]. For the inhibition of mycelia development and conidia formation in Aspergillus spp., Guerra and his collogues showed the strong antifungal activity of coumarin derivative 7-hydroxy-6-nitro-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one [155].
Future prospective
This review emphasizes that coumarin and its derivatives have significant antifungal efficacy against most threatened and opportunistic mycoses. The pharmacological assays of coumarin-based organic compound manifested that the antifungal activity of these derivatives was magnificent and could be a futuristic promising antifungal candidate. Although several pharmacological properties have been established for the bioactivity of coumarin and its derivatives, further one-step analysis of coumarin against fungal biofilm remains unexplored.
References
Ji Q, Ge Z, Ge Z, Chen K, Wu H, Liu X, Huang Y, Yuan L, Yang X, Liao F (2016) Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel phosphoramidate derivatives of coumarin as chitin synthase inhibitors and antifungal agents. Eur J Med Chem 108:166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.11.027
Gulcin I, Tel AZ, Kirecci E (2008) Antioxidant, antimicrobial, antifungal, and antiradical activities of Cyclotrichium niveum (Boiss.) Manden and Scheng. Int J Food Prop 11:450–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942910701567364
Gülçın İ, Oktay M, Kıreçcı E, Küfrevıoǧlu Öİ (2003) Screening of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of anise (Pimpinella anisum L.) seed extracts. Food Chem 83:371–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00098-0
Gülçin I, Küfrevioǧlu Öİ, Oktay M, Büyükokuroǧlu ME (2004) Antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiulcer and analgesic activities of nettle (Urtica dioica L.). J Ethnopharmacol 90:205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2003.09.028
Köhler JR, Casadevall A, Perfect J (2015) The spectrum of fungi that infects humans. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 5:a019273. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a019273
Bruneton J (1995) Pharmacognosy, phytochemistry, medicinal plants. Lavoisier Publishing, Paris
Iranshahi M, Askari M, Sahebkar A, Adjipavlou-Litina D (2009) Evaluation of antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and lipoxygenase inhibitory activities of the prenylated coumarin umbelliprenin. Daru J Pharma Sci 17:99–103
Kontogiorgis C, Detsi A, Hadjipavlou-Litina D (2012) Coumarin-based drugs: a patent review (2008-present). Expert Opin Ther Pat 22:437–454. https://doi.org/10.1517/13543776.2012.678835
Lake BG, Grasso P (1996) Comparison of the hepatotoxicity of coumarin in the rat, mouse, and Syrian hamster: a dose and time response study. Fundam Appl Toxicol 34:105–117. https://doi.org/10.1006/faat.1996.0181
Soine TO (1964) Naturally occurring coumarins and related physiological activities. J Pharm Sci 53:231–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600530302
Borges F, Roleira F, Milhazes N, Santana L, Uriarte E (2005) Simple coumarins and analogues in medicinal chemistry: occurrence, synthesis and biological activity. Curr Med Chem 12:887–916. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867053507315
Fylaktakidou KC, Hadjipavlou-Litina DJ, Litinas KE, Nicolaides DN (2004) Natural and synthetic coumarin derivatives with anti-inflammatory/antioxidant activities. Curr Pharm Des 10:3813–3833. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612043382710
Egan D, O’kennedy R, Moran E, Cox D, Prosser E, Thornes RD (1990) The pharmacology, metabolism, analysis, and applications of coumarin and coumarin-related compounds. Drug Metab Rev. https://doi.org/10.3109/03602539008991449
Dini A, Ramundo E, Saturnino P, Scimone A, Stagno IdA (1992) Isolation, characterization and antimicrobial activity of coumarin derivatives from Cyperus incompletus. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper 68:453–461
Brown GD, Denning DW, Gow NA, Levitz SM, Netea MG, White TC (2012) Hidden killers: human fungal infections. Sci Transl Med 4:165rv113–165rv113. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3004404
O’Brien HE, Parrent JL, Jackson JA, Moncalvo J-M, Vilgalys R (2005) Fungal community analysis by large-scale sequencing of environmental samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5544–5550. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.9.5544-5550.2005
Köhler J, Casadevall A, Perfect J (2014) The spectrum of fungi that infects humans. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 5:a019273. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a019273
Reedy JL, Bastidas RJ, Heitman J (2007) The virulence of human pathogenic fungi: notes from the south of France. Cell Host Microbe 2:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2007.07.004
Sganga G (2011) Fungal infections in immunocompromised patients. Mycoses 54:1. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2011.02134.x
Kathiravan MK, Salake AB, Chothe AS, Dudhe PB, Watode RP, Mukta MS, Gadhwe S (2012) The biology and chemistry of antifungal agents: a review. Bioorg Med Chem 20:5678–5698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2012.04.045
Ley RE, Lozupone CA, Hamady M, Knight R, Gordon JI (2008) Worlds within worlds: evolution of the vertebrate gut microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:776–788. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1978
Lee YK, Mazmanian SK (2010) Has the microbiota played a critical role in the evolution of the adaptive immune system? Science 330:1768–1773. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1195568
Seebacher C, Bouchara J-P, Mignon B (2008) Updates on the epidemiology of dermatophyte infections. Mycopathologia 166:335–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-008-9100-9
Grice EA, Kong HH, Conlan S, Deming CB, Davis J, Young AC, Bouffard GG, Blakesley RW, Murray PR, Green ED (2009) Topographical and temporal diversity of the human skin microbiome. Science 324:1190–1192. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171700
Jahns AC, Alexeyev OA (2014) Three dimensional distribution of Propionibacterium acnes biofilms in human skin. Exp Dermatol 23:687–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.12482
Havlickova B, Czaika VA, Friedrich M (2008) Epidemiological trends in skin mycoses worldwide. Mycoses 51:2–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01606.x
Otto M (2009) Staphylococcus epidermidis—the ‘accidental’ pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:555–567. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2182
Ibrahim F, Khan T, Pujalte GG (2015) Bacterial skin infections. Prim Care 42:485–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pop.2015.08.001
Findley K, Oh J, Yang J, Conlan S, Deming C, Meyer JA, Schoenfeld D, Nomicos E, Park M, Sequencing NISCC (2013) Topographic diversity of fungal and bacterial communities in human skin. Nat 498:367–370. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12171
Mohandas V, Ballal M (2011) Distribution of Candida species in different clinical samples and their virulence: biofilm formation, proteinase and phospholipase production: a study on hospitalized patients in southern India. J Glob Infect Dis 3:4–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-777x.77288
Kashem SW, Kaplan DH (2016) Skin immunity to Candida albicans. Trends Immunol 37:440–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2016.04.007
Nema H, Ahuja O, Bal A, Mohapatra L (1966) Mycotic flora of the conjunctiva. Am J Ophthalmol 62:968–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(66)91928-3
Yu H (1965) Studies on fungi of the normal skin. Hifuka Kiyo 60:126–174
Vennewald I, Wollina U (2005) Cutaneous infections due to opportunistic molds: uncommon presentations. Clin Dermatol 23:565–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2005.01.003
Baley JE, Kliegman RM, Boxerbaum B, Fanaroft AA (1986) Fungal colonization in the very low birth weight infant. Pediatrics 78:225–232
Huang YC, Li CC, Lin TY, Lien RI, Chou YH, Wu JL, Hsueh C (1998) Association of fungal colonization and invasive disease in very low birth weight infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 17:819–822. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006454-199809000-00014
El-Mohandes AE, Johnson-Robbins L, Keiser JF, Simmens SJ, Aure MV (1994) Incidence of Candida parapsilosis colonization in an intensive care nursery population and its association with invasive fungal disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J 13:520–524. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006454-199406000-00011
Roilides E, Farmaki E, Evdoridou J, Francesconi A, Kasai M, Filioti J, Tsivitanidou M, Sofianou D, Kremenopoulos G, Walsh TJ (2003) Candida tropicalis in a neonatal intensive care unit: epidemiologic and molecular analysis of an outbreak of infection with an uncommon neonatal pathogen. J Clin Microbiol 41:735–741. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.41.2.735-741.2003
Brown GD, Denning DW, Levitz SM (2012) Tackling human fungal infections. Am Assoc Adv Sci 336:647. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1222236
Kirkpatrick CH (1994) Chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 31:14–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(08)81260-1
Johnson RA (2000) HIV disease: mucocutaneous fungal infections in HIV disease. Clin Dermatol 18:411–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0738-081x(99)00136-4
Richardson J, Ho J, Naglik J (2018) Candida–Epithelial interactions. J Fungi 4:22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4010022
Goughenour KD, Rappleye CA (2017) Antifungal therapeutics for dimorphic fungal pathogens. Virulence 8:211–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2016.1235653
Sullivan DJ, Moran GP (2014) Human pathogenic fungi: molecular biology and pathogenic mechanisms. Caister Academic Press, Poole
Supparatpinyo K, Khamwan C, Baosoung V, Sirisanthana T, Nelson K (1994) Disseminated Penicillium marneffei infection in southeast Asia. Lancet 344:110–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91287-4
Garibotto FM, Garro AD, Masman MF, Rodríguez AM, Luiten PG, Raimondi M, Zacchino SA, Somlai C, Penke B, Enriz RD (2010) New small-size peptides possessing antifungal activity. Bioorg Med Chem 18:158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2009.11.009
Bassetti M, Righi E, Costa A, Fasce R, Molinari MP, Rosso R, Pallavicini FB, Viscoli C (2006) Epidemiological trends in nosocomial candidemia in intensive care. BMC Infect Dis 6:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-21
Cramer RA, Perfect JR (2009) Recent advances in understanding human opportunistic fungal pethogenesis mechanisms. In: Anaissie EJ, McGinnis MR, Pfaller MA (eds) Clinical mycology, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburg, pp 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4160-5680-5.00002-5
Casadevall A (2007) Determinants of virulence in the pathogenic fungi. Fungal Biol Rev 21:130–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2007.02.007
Calderone RA, Fonzi WA (2001) Virulence factors of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol 9:327–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-842X(01)02094-7
Mayer FL, Wilson D, Hube B (2013) Candida albicans pathogenicity mechanisms. Virulence 4:119–128. https://doi.org/10.4161/viru.22913
Mendes-Giannini MJS, Soares CP, da Silva JLM, Andreotti PF (2005) Interaction of pathogenic fungi with host cells: molecular and cellular approaches. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 45:383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsim.2005.05.014
Khan MSA, Ahmad I, Aqil F, Owais M, Shahid M, Musarrat J (2010) Virulence and pathogenicity of fungal pathogens with special reference to Candida albicans. Combat Fungal Infect. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12173-9_2
Li X, Yan Z, Xu J (2003) Quantitative variation of biofilms among strains in natural populations of Candida albicans. Microbiology 149:353–362. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.25932-0
Kabir MA, Hussain MA, Ahmad Z (2012) Candida albicans: a model organism for studying fungal pathogens. ISRN Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/538694
Kumamoto CA (2008) Molecular mechanisms of mechanosensing and their roles in fungal contact sensing. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:667–673. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1960
Davis D (2003) Adaptation to environmental pH in Candida albicans and its relation to pathogenesis. Curr Genet 44:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-003-0415-2
Danhof HA, Vylkova S, Vesely EM, Ford AE, Gonzalez-Garay M, Lorenz MC (2016) Robust extracellular pH modulation by Candida albicans during growth in carboxylic acids. MBio 7:e01646-01616. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01646-16
Mendes-Giannini MJS, Taylor M, Bouchara J, Burger E, Calich V, Escalante E, Hanna S, Lenzi H, Machado M, Miyaji M (2000) Pathogenesis II: fungal responses to host responses: interaction of host cells with fungi. Med Mycol 38:113–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/mmy.38.s1.113.123
Finlay BB, Falkow S (1997) Common themes in microbial pathogenicity revisited. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:136–169
Tsarfaty I, Sandovsky-Losica H, Mittelman L, Berdicevsky I, Segal E (2000) Cellular actin is affected by interaction with Candida albicans. FEMS Microbiol Lett 189:225–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09235.x
Wasylnka JA, Moore MM (2002) Uptake of Aspergillus fumigatus conidia by phagocytic and nonphagocytic cells in vitro: quantitation using strains expressing green fluorescent protein. Infect Immun 70:3156–3163. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.70.6.3156-3163.2002
Mendes-Giannini MJS, Hanna SA, da Silva JLM, Andreotti PF, Vincenzi LR, Benard G, Lenzi HL, Soares CP (2004) Invasion of epithelial mammalian cells by Paracoccidioides brasiliensis leads to cytoskeletal rearrangement and apoptosis of the host cell. Microbes Infect 6:882–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2004.05.005
Sheppard DC, Filler SG (2015) Host cell invasion by medically important fungi. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 5:a019687. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a019687
Dalle F, Wächtler B, L’ollivier C, Holland G, Bannert N, Wilson D, Labruère C, Bonnin A, Hube B (2010) Cellular interactions of Candida albicans with human oral epithelial cells and enterocytes. Cell Microbiol 12:248–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01394.x
McKenzie C, Koser U, Lewis L, Bain J, Mora-Montes H, Barker R, Gow N, Erwig L (2010) Contribution of Candida albicans cell wall components to recognition by and escape from murine macrophages. Infect Immun 78:1650–1658. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00001-10
Lorenz MC, Bender JA, Fink GR (2004) Transcriptional response of Candida albicans upon internalization by macrophages. Eukaryot Cell 3:1076–1087. https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.3.5.1076-1087.2004
Phan QT, Myers CL, Fu Y, Sheppard DC, Yeaman MR, Welch WH, Ibrahim AS, Edwards JE Jr, Filler SG (2007) Als3 is a Candida albicans invasin that binds to cadherins and induces endocytosis by host cells. PLoS Biol 5:e64. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050064
Park H, Myers CL, Sheppard DC, Phan QT, Sanchez AA, Edwards JE, Filler SG (2005) Role of the fungal Rasprotein kinase A pathway in governing epithelial cell interactions during oropharyngeal candidiasis. Cell Microbiol 7:499–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00476.x
Feldmesser M, Tucker S, Casadevall A (2001) Intracellular parasitism of macrophages by Cryptococcus neoformans. Trends Microbiol 9:273–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-842X(01)02035-2
Nicola AM, Robertson EJ, Albuquerque P, da Silveira Derengowski L, Casadevall A (2011) Nonlytic exocytosis of Cryptococcus neoformans from macrophages occurs in vivo and is influenced by phagosomal pH. MBio 2:e00167-00111. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00167-11
Sheehan DJ, Hitchcock CA, Sibley CM (1999) Current and emerging azole antifungal agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 12:40–79. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.12.1.40
Fromtling RA (1988) Overview of medically important antifungal azole derivatives. Clin Microbiol Rev 1:187–217. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.1.2.187
Turkan F, Cetin A, Taslimi P, Gulçin İ (2018) Some pyrazoles derivatives: potent carbonic anhydrase, α-glycosidase, and cholinesterase enzymes inhibitors. Arch Pharma 351:1800200. https://doi.org/10.1002/ardp.201800200
Turkan F, Cetin A, Taslimi P, Karaman M, Gulçin İ (2019) Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular docking of novel pyrazole derivatives as potent carbonic anhydrase and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Bioorg Chem 86:420–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.02.013
Güzel E, Koçyiğit ÜM, Arslan BS, Ataş M, Taslimi P, Gökalp F, Nebioğlu M, Şişman İ, Gulçin İ (2019) Aminopyrazole-substituted metallophthalocyanines: preparation, aggregation behavior, and investigation of metabolic enzymes inhibition properties. Arch Pharm 352:1800292. https://doi.org/10.1002/ardp.201800292
Kuzu B, Tan M, Taslimi P, Gülçin İ, Taşpınar M, Menges N (2019) Mono- or di-substituted imidazole derivatives for inhibition of acetylcholine and butyrylcholine esterases. Bioorg Chem 86:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.01.044
Ujjinamatada RK, Baier A, Borowski P, Hosmane RS (2007) An analogue of AICAR with dual inhibitory activity against WNV and HCV NTPase/helicase: synthesis and in vitro screening of 4-carbamoyl-5-(4,6-diamino-2,5-dihydro-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl) imidazole-1-β-d-ribofuranoside. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 17:2285–2288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.01.074
Emami S, Foroumadi A, Falahati M, Lotfali E, Rajabalian S, Ebrahimi S-A, Farahyar S, Shafiee A (2008) 2-Hydroxyphenacyl azoles and related azolium derivatives as antifungal agents. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 18:141–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.10.111
Timur İ, Kocyigit ÜM, Dastan T, Sandal S, Ceribası AO, Taslimi P, Gulcin İ, Koparir M, Karatepe M, Çiftçi M (2019) In vitro cytotoxic and in vivo antitumoral activities of some aminomethyl derivatives of 2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones—evaluation of their acetylcholinesterase and carbonic anhydrase enzymes inhibition profiles. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 33:e22239. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.22239
Shingalapur RV, Hosamani KM, Keri RS (2009) Synthesis and evaluation of in vitro anti-microbial and anti-tubercular activity of 2-styryl benzimidazoles. Eur J Med Chem 44:4244–4248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.05.021
Sarı Y, Aktaş A, Taslimi P, Gök Y, Gulçin İ (2018) Novel N-propylphthalimide- and 4-vinylbenzyl-substituted benzimidazole salts: synthesis, characterization, and determination of their metal chelating effects and inhibition profiles against acetylcholinesterase and carbonic anhydrase enzymes. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 32:e22009. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.22009
Gök Y, Akkoç S, Erdoğan H, Albayrak S (2016) In vitro antimicrobial studies of new benzimidazolium salts and silver N-heterocyclic carbene complexes. J Enzym Inhib Med Chem 31(6):1322–1327. https://doi.org/10.3109/14756366.2015.1132210
Türker F, Barut Celepci D, Aktaş A, Taslimi P, Gök Y, Aygün M, Gülçin İ (2018) Meta-cyanobenzyl substituted benzimidazolium salts: synthesis, characterization, crystal structure and carbonic anhydrase, α-glycosidase, butyrylcholinesterase, and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory properties. Arch Pharm 351:1800029. https://doi.org/10.1002/ardp.201800029
Borgers M (1980) Mechanism of action of antifungal drugs, with special reference to the imidazole derivatives. Rev Infect Dis 2:520–534. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/2.4.520
Van den Bossche H, Ruysschaert JM, Defrise-Quertain F, Willemsens G, Cornelissen F, Marichal P, Cools W, Van Cutsem J (1982) The interaction of miconazole and ketoconazole with lipids. Biochem Pharma 31:2609–2617. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(82)90707-9
Akins RA (2005) An update on antifungal targets and mechanisms of resistance in Candida albicans. Med Mycol 43:285–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/13693780500138971
Munayyer HK, Mann PA, Chau AS, Yarosh-Tomaine T, Greene JR, Hare RS, Heimark L, Palermo RE, Loebenberg D, McNicholas PM (2004) Posaconazole is a potent inhibitor of sterol 14α-demethylation in yeasts and molds. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:3690–3696. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.48.10.3690-3696.2004
Hof H (2006) A new, broad-spectrum azole antifungal: posaconazole–mechanisms of action and resistance, spectrum of activity. Mycoses 49:2–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2006.01295.x
Vandeputte P, Ferrari S, Coste AT (2011) Antifungal resistance and new strategies to control fungal infections. Int J Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/713687
Brown R, Hazen EL (1957) Present knowledge of nystatin, an antifungal antibiotic. Trans NY Acad Sci 19:447–456
Sloane MB (1955) A new antifungal antibiotic, mycostatin (nystatin), ior the treatment of moniliasis: a preliminary report. J Investig Dermatol 24:569–571. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.1955.77
Lemke A, Kiderlen A, Kayser O (2005) Amphotericin B. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 68:151–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-1955-9
Sanglard D, Odds FC (2002) Resistance of Candida species to antifungal agents: molecular mechanisms and clinical consequences. Lancet Infect Dis 2:73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(02)00181-0
Kato H, Hagihara M, Yamagishi Y, Shibata Y, Kato Y, Furui T, Watanabe H, Asai N, Koizumi Y, Mikamo H (2018) The evaluation of frequency of nephrotoxicity caused by liposomal amphotericin B. J Infect Chemother 24:725–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2018.04.014
Bossche HV (2002) Echinocandins: an update. Expert Opin Ther Pat 12:151–167. https://doi.org/10.1517/13543776.12.2.151
Denning DW (2003) Echinocandin antifungal drugs. Lancet 362:1142–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14472-8
Douglas C, D’ippolito J, Shei G, Meinz M, Onishi J, Marrinan J, Li W, Abruzzo G, Flattery A, Bartizal K (1997) Identification of the FKS1 gene of Candida albicans as the essential target of 1,3-beta-d-glucan synthase inhibitors. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41:2471–2479. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.41.11.2471
Grover ND (2010) Echinocandins: a ray of hope in antifungal drug therapy. Indian J Pharmacol 42:9–11. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7613.62396
Denning DW (2002) Echinocandins: a new class of antifungal. J Antimicrob Chemother 49:889–891. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkf045
Vermes A, Guchelaar HJ, Dankert J (2000) Flucytosine: a review of its pharmacology, clinical indications, pharmacokinetics, toxicity and drug interactions. J Antimicrob Chemother 46:171–179. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/46.2.171
Onishi J, Meinz M, Thompson J, Curotto J, Dreikorn S, Rosenbach M, Douglas C, Abruzzo G, Flattery A, Kong L (2000) Discovery of novel antifungal (1,3)-β-d-glucan synthase inhibitors. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:368–377. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.44.2.368-377.2000
Sanglard D, Coste A, Ferrari S (2009) Antifungal drug resistance mechanisms in fungal pathogens from the perspective of transcriptional gene regulation. FEMS Yeast Res 9:1029–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00578.x
Ryder NS (1988) Mechanism of action and biochemical selectivity of allylamine antimycotic agents. Ann NY Acad Sci 544:208–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb40405.x
Baloch RI, Mercer EI (1987) Inhibition of sterol Δ8 → Δ7-isomerase and Δ14-reductase by fenpropimorph tridemorph and fenpropidin in cell-free enzyme systems from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Phytochemistry 26:663–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)84762-7
Polak A (1990) Mode of action studies. In: Ryley JF (ed) Chemotherapy of fungal diseases. Handbook of experimental pharmacology, vol 96. Springer, Berlin, pp 153–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75458-6_8
Evans WC (2009) Trease and evans’ pharmacognosy E-book. Els Health Sci, Saunders Ltd., London
Mead J, Smith J, Williams R (1958) Studies in detoxication. 72. The metabolism of coumarin and of o-coumaric acid. Biochem J 68:67–74. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0680067
Venugopala KN, Rashmi V, Odhav B (2013) Review on natural coumarin lead compounds for their pharmacological activity. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/963248
Murray R (1989) Coumarins. Nat Prod Rep 6:591–624
Piller N (1975) A comparison of the effectiveness of some anti-inflammatory drugs on thermal oedema. Br J Exp Pathol 56:554–559
Whitlon D, Sadowski J, Suttie J (1978) Mechanism of coumarin action: significance of vitamin K epoxide reductase inhibition. Biochemistry 17:1371–1377. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00601a003
Hodak K, Jakesová V, Dadák V (1967) On the antibiotic effects of natural coumarins. VI. The relation of structure to the antibacterial effects of some natural coumarins and the neutralization of such effects. Cesk Farm 16:86–91
Wang CM, Zhou W, Li CX, Chen H, Shi ZQ, Fan YJ (2009) Efficacy of osthol, a potent coumarin compound, in controlling powdery mildew caused by Sphaerotheca fuliginea. J Asian Nat Prod Res 11:783–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286020903158964
Patil AD, Freyer AJ, Eggleston DS, Haltiwanger RC, Bean MF, Taylor PB, Caranfa MJ, Breen AL, Bartus HR (1993) The inophyllums, novel inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase isolated from the Malaysian tree, Calophyllum inophyllum Linn. J Med Chem 36:4131–4138. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm00078a001
Kashman Y, Gustafson KR, Fuller R, McMahon J, Currens M, Buckheit JR, Hughes S, Cragg G, Boyd M (1992) The calanolides, a novel HIV-inhibitory class of coumarin derivatives from the tropical rainforest tree, Calophyllum lanigerum. J Med Chem 35:2735–2743. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm00093a004
Shin E, Choi K-M, Yoo H-S, Lee C-K, Hwang BY, Lee MK (2010) Inhibitory effects of coumarins from the stem barks of Fraxinus rhynchophylla on adipocyte differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells. Biol Pharm Bull 33:1610–1614. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.33.1610
Luszczki JJ, Wojda E, Andres-Mach M, Cisowski W, Glensk M, Glowniak K, Czuczwar SJ (2009) Anticonvulsant and acute neurotoxic effects of imperatorin, osthole and valproate in the maximal electroshock seizure and chimney tests in mice: a comparative study. Epile Res 85:293–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2009.03.027
Basile A, Sorbo S, Spadaro V, Bruno M, Maggio A, Faraone N, Rosselli S (2009) Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of coumarins from the roots of Ferulago campestris (Apiaceae). Mol 14:939–952. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules14030939
Finkelstein N, Rivett DE (1976) Puberulin, a new prenyloxy-coumarin from Agathosma puberula. Phytochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)84417-9
Bourgaud F, Hehn A, Larbat R, Doerper S, Gontier E, Kellner S, Matern U (2006) Biosynthesis of coumarins in plants: a major pathway still to be unravelled for cytochrome P450 enzymes. Phytochem Rev 5:293–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-006-9040-2
Pereira TM, Franco DP, Vitorio F, Kummerle AE (2018) Coumarin compounds in medicinal chemistry: some important examples from the last years. Curr Top Med Chem 18:124–148. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026618666180329115523
Costa TM, Tavares LBB, de Oliveira D (2016) Fungi as a source of natural coumarins production. App Microbiol Biotechnol 100:6571–6584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7660-z
Matos MJ, Santana L, Uriarte E, Abreu OA, Molina E, Yordi EG (2015) Coumarins-An important class of phytochemicals, phytochemicals. IntechOpen 5:113–140. https://doi.org/10.5772/59982
Yang J, Sun X, Yang F, Liu C (2013) New agrochemicals disclosed in 2012. (State Key Laboratory of the Discovery and Development of Novel Pesticide, Shenyang Research Institute of Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Shenyang 110021, China). Agrochemical 2013-01
Peng XM, Damu GLV, Zhou H (2013) Current developments of coumarin compounds in medicinal chemistry. Curr Pharm Des 19:3884–3930. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612811319210013
Stiefel C, Schubert T, Morlock GE (2017) Bioprofiling of cosmetics with focus on streamlined coumarin analysis. ACS Omega 2:5242–5250. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b00562
Boisde PM, Meuly WC, Ub Staff (2000) Coumarin. Kirk-Othmer Encycl Chem Technol 4:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471238961.0315211302150919.a01
Authority EFS (2008) Coumarin in flavourings and other food ingredients with flavouring properties-Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food (AFC). EFSA J 6:793. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2008.793
He X, Shang Y, Zhou Y, Yu Z, Han G, Jin W, Chen J (2015) Synthesis of coumarin-3-carboxylic esters via FeCl3-catalyzed multicomponent reaction of salicylaldehydes, Meldrum’s acid and alcohols. Tetrahedron 71:863–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2014.12.042
Sandhu S, Bansal Y, Silakari O, Bansal G (2014) Coumarin hybrids as novel therapeutic agents. Bioorg Med Chem 22:3806–3814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2014.05.032
Anand P, Singh B, Singh N (2012) A review on coumarins as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer’s disease. Bioorg Med Chem 20:1175–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2011.12.042
Upadhyay K, Mishra RK, Kumar A (2008) A convenient synthesis of some coumarin derivatives using SnCl2·2H2O as catalyst. Catal Lett 121:118–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-007-9307-2
Shaabani A, Ghadari R, Rahmati A, Rezayan A (2009) Coumarin synthesis via Knoevenagel condensation reaction in 1,1,3,3-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylguanidinium trifluoroacetate ionic liquid. J Iran Chem Soc 6:710–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03246160
Harayama T, Nakatsuka K, Nishioka H, Murakami K, Hayashida N, Ishii H (1994) Convenient synthesis of a simple coumarin from salicylaldehyde and wittig reagent. II. Synthesis of bromo-and methoxycarbonylcoumarins. Chem Pharm Bull 42:2170–2173. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.42.2170
Ghantwal S, Samant S (1999) Claisen rearrangement of 3-bromo-,3, 6-dibromo-,3,8-dibromo-and 8-iodo/aminomethyl/acetyl-7-allyloxy-4-methylcoumarins. NISCAIR-CSIR, India, pp 1242–1247. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/16650. Accessed Nov 1999
Bulut M, Erk C (1996) Improved synthesis of some hydroxycoumarins. Dyes Pigm 30:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-7208(95)00060-7
Al-Bayati RI, Al-Amiery AAH, Al-Majedy YK (2010) Design, synthesis and bioassay of novel coumarins. Afr J Pure Appl Chem 4(6):74–86
Robertson A, Sandrock WF, Hendry CB (1931) CCCXXX. Hydroxy-carbonyl compounds. Part V. The preparation of coumarins and 1:4-pyrones from phenol, p-cresol, quinol, and α-naphthol. J Chem Soc. https://doi.org/10.1039/JR9310002426
Soares VC, Alves MB, Souza ER, Pinto IO, Rubim JC, Andrade CKZ, Suarez PA (2007) Organo-niobate ionic liquids: synthesis, characterization and application as acid catalyst in Pechmann reactions. Int J Mol Sci 8:392–398. https://doi.org/10.3390/i8050392
John E, Israelstam S (1961) Use of cation exchange resins in organic reactions. I. The Von Pechmann reaction. J Org Chem 26:240–242. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo01060a602
Reddy BM, Reddy VR, Giridhar D (2001) Synthesis of coumarins catalyzed by eco-friendly W/ZrO2 solid acid catalyst. Synth Commun 31:3603–3607. https://doi.org/10.1081/SCC-100107007
Al-Majedy YK, Kadhum AAH, Al-Amiery AA, Mohamad AB (2017) Coumarins: the antimicrobial agents. Syst Rev Pharm 8:62–70. https://doi.org/10.5530/srp.2017.1.11
Hoult J, Paya M (1996) Pharmacological and biochemical actions of simple coumarins: natural products with therapeutic potential. Gen Pharmacol Vasc Syst 27:713–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-3623(95)02112-4
Mercer DK, Robertson J, Wright K, Miller L, Smith S, Stewart CS, Deborah A (2013) A prodrug approach to the use of coumarins as potential therapeutics for superficial mycoses. PLoS ONE 8:e80760. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080760
Guerra FQ, Araújo RS, Sousa JP, Silva VA, Pereira FO, Mendonça-Junior FJ, Barbosa-Filho JM, Pereira JA, Lima EO (2018) A new coumarin derivative, 4-acetatecoumarin, with antifungal activity and association study against Aspergillus spp. Braz J Microbiol 49:407–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.06.009
Puttaraju KB, Shivashankar K, Mahendra M, Rasal VP, Vivek PNV, Rai K, Chanu MB (2013) Microwave assisted synthesis of dihydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-4-ones; synthesis, in vitro antimicrobial and anticancer activities of novel coumarin substituted dihydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidin-4-ones. Eur J Med Chem 69:316–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.07.015
Marcondes HC, de Oliveira TT, Taylor JG, Hamoy M, do Leonel Neto A, de Mello VJ, Nagem TJ (2015) Antifungal activity of coumarin mammeisin isolated from species of the Kielmeyera Genre (family: Clusiaceae or Guttiferae). J Chem Article ID 241243. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/241243
Ojala T, Remes S, Haansuu P, Vuorela H, Hiltunen R, Haahtela K, Vuorela P (2000) Antimicrobial activity of some coumarin containing herbal plants growing in Finland. J Ethnopharmacol 73:299–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8741(00)00279-8
Thati B, Noble A, Rowan R, Creaven BS, Walsh M, McCann M, Egan D, Kavanagh K (2007) Mechanism of action of coumarin and silver(I)–coumarin complexes against the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans. Toxicol In Vitro 21:801–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2007.01.022
Zhang MZ, Zhang RR, Wang JQ, Yu X, Zhang YL, Wang QQ, Zhang WH (2016) Microwave-assisted synthesis and antifungal activity of novel fused Osthole derivatives. Eur J Med Chem 124:10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.08.012
Siddiqui ZN, Ahmad A, Khan AU (2011) Synthesis of 4-hydroxycoumarin heteroarylhybrids as potential antimicrobial agents. Arch Pharma 344:394–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/ardp.201000218
Dietrich SM, Valio I (1973) Effect of coumarin and its derivatives on the growth of Pythium and other fungi. Trans Br Mycol Soc 61:461–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(73)80116-0
Knypl J (1963) A fungistatic action of coumarin. Nature 200:800–802. https://doi.org/10.1038/200800b0
Guerra FQS, Araújo RSAD, Sousa JPD, Pereira FDO, Mendonça-Junior FJ, Barbosa-Filho JM, de Oliveira Lima E (2015) Evaluation of antifungal activity and mode of action of new coumarin derivative, 7-hydroxy-6-nitro-2h-1-benzopyran-2-one, against Aspergillus spp. Evid Based Complement Altern Med Article ID 925096. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/925096
Shao PL, Huang LM, Hsueh PR (2007) Recent advances and challenges in the treatment of invasive fungal infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 30:487–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.07.019
Henry JC (1984) Ketoconazole. Dermatol Clin 2:121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8635(18)30996-3
Zaragoza R, Pemán J (2008) The diagnostic and therapeutic approach to fungal infections in critical care settings. Adv Sepsis 6:90–98
Ghannoum MA, Kuhn D (2002) Voriconazole—better chances for patients with invasive mycoses. Eur J Med Res 7:242–256
Denning DW, Ribaud P, Milpied N, Caillot D, Herbrecht R, Thiel E, Haas A, Ruhnke M, Lode H (2002) Efficacy and safety of voriconazole in the treatment of acute invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis 34:563–571. https://doi.org/10.1086/324620
Thompson GR, Cadena J, Patterson TF (2009) Overview of antifungal agents. Clin Chest Med 30:203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccm.2009.02.001
Keating GM (2005) Posaconazole. Drugs 65:1553–1567. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200565110-00007
Torres HA, Hachem RY, Chemaly RF, Kontoyiannis DP, Raad II (2005) Posaconazole: a broad-spectrum triazole antifungal. Lancet Infect Dis 5:775–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70297-8
Yamazumi T, Pfaller M, Messer S, Houston A, Hollis R, Jones R (2000) In vitro activities of ravuconazole (BMS-207147) against 541 clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:2883–2886. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.44.10.2883-2886.2000
Zonios DI, Bennett JE (2008) Update on azole antifungals. In: Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine. Thieme Medical Publishers, New York, pp 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1063858
Pardasani A (2000) Oral antifungal agents used in dermatology. Curr Probl Dermatol 12(6):270–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-0486(00)90023-1
Vincent T (2000) Current and future antifungal therapy: new targets for antifungal therapy. Int J Antimicrob Agents 16:317–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-8579(00)00258-2
Fleet G (1991) Cell walls. In: Rose AH, Harrison JS (eds) The yeasts: yeast organelles, 4, 2nd edn. Acad Press, London, pp 199–277
Garcia-Cuesta C, Sarrion-Pérez MG, Bagán JV (2014) Current treatment of oral candidiasis: a literature review. J Clin Exp Dent 6:e576–e582. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.51798
Te Welscher YM, Hendrik H, Balagué MM, Souza CM, Riezman H, De Kruijff B, Breukink E (2008) Natamycin blocks fungal growth by binding specifically to ergosterol without permeabilizing the membrane. J Biol Chem 283:6393–6401. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M707821200
Nett JE, Andes DR (2016) Antifungal agents: spectrum of activity, pharmacology, and clinical indications. Infect Dis Clin 30:51–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2015.10.012
Chen SC, Sorrell TC (2007) Antifungal agents. Med J Aust 187:404–409. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01313.x
Khan ZK, Jain P (2000) Antifungal agents and immunomodulators in systemic mycoses. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 42:345–356
Hata M, Ishii Y, Watanabe E, Uoto K, Kobayashi S, Yoshida K-I, Otani T, Ando A (2010) Inhibition of ergosterol synthesis by novel antifungal compounds targeting C-14 reductase. Med Mycol 48:613–621. https://doi.org/10.3109/13693780903390208
Al-Amiery AA, Kadhum AAH, Mohamad AB (2012) Antifungal activities of new coumarins. Molecules 17:5713–5723. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17055713
Behrami A, Krasniqi I (2012) Antibacterial activity of coumarine derivatives synthesized from 8-amino-4,7-dihydroxy-chromen-2-one and comparison with standard drug. J Chem Pharm Res 4:2495–2500
Bonsignore L, Cottiglia F, Elkhaili H, Jehl F, Lavagna SM, Loy G, Manna F, Monteil H, Pompei D, Secci D (1998) Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of coumarin 7-substituted cephalosporins and sulfones. Il Farmaco 53:425–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-827X(98)00047-0
Brahmbhatt D, Kaneria AR, Patel AK, Patel NH (2010) Synthesis and antimicrobial screening of some 3-[4-(3-aryl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-6-aryl-pyridin-2-yl] and 4-methyl-3-phenyl-6-[4-(3-aryl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-6-aryl-pyridin-2-yl] coumarins. CSIR, pp 971–977. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/9935. Accessed July 2010
Bairagi S, Bhosale A, Deodhar MN (2009) Design, synthesis and evaluation of Schiff’s bases of 4-chloro-3-coumarin aldehyde as antimicrobial agents. J Chem 6:759–762. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/874389
Basanagouda M, Kulkarni MV, Sharma D, Gupta VK, Sandhyarani P, Rasal VP (2009) Synthesis of some new 4-aryloxmethylcoumarins and examination of their antibacterial and antifungal activities. J Chem Sci 121:485–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12039-009-0058-z
Widelski J, Luca SV, Skiba A, Chinou I, Marcourt L, Wolfender J-L, Skalicka-Wozniak K (2018) Isolation and antimicrobial activity of coumarin derivatives from fruits of Peucedanum luxurians Tamamsch. Molecules 23:1222. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23051222
Zhang SY, Fu DJ, Sun HH, Yue XX, Liu YC, Zhang YB, Liu HM (2016) Synthesis and bioactivity of novel coumarin derivatives. Chem Heterocycl Compd 52:374–378
Dizbay M et al (2009) Fungemia and cutaneous zygomycosis due to Mucor circinelloides in an intensive care unit patient: case report and review of literature. Jpn J Infect Dis 62(2):146–148
Kobayashi GS (1996) Disease mechanisms of fungi. In: Baron S (ed) Medical microbiology, 4th edn. Galveston
Chapman SW, Dismukes WE, Proia LA, Bradsher RW, Pappas PG, Threlkeld MG, Kauffman CA (2008) Clinical practice guidelines for the management of blastomycosis: 2008 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 46(12):1801–1812. https://doi.org/10.1086/588300
Tavanti A, Naglik JR, Osherov N (2012). Host–fungal interactions: pathogenicity versus immunity. Int J Microbiol Article ID 562480. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/562480
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Department of Biotechnology (DBT, Government of India) through Project No. BT/IN/Indo-US/Foldscope/39/2015, and JSP received a fellowship from DBT, Government of India. The authors are grateful to the National Institute of Technology (NIT), Raipur (CG), India, for providing the space and facilities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prusty, J.S., Kumar, A. Coumarins: antifungal effectiveness and future therapeutic scope. Mol Divers 24, 1367–1383 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-019-09992-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-019-09992-x