Abstract
Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) is considered a proxy of soil health, contributing to food production, mitigation, and adaptation to climate change and other ecosystem services. Implementing Recommended Management Practices (RMPs) may increase SOC stocks, contributing to achieve the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 21st Conference of the Parties agreements reached in Paris, France. In this framework, the “4 per 1000” initiative invites partners implementing practical actions to reach a SOC stock annual growth of 4‰. For the first time, we assessed the achievement of 4‰ objective in Mediterranean agricultural soils, aiming at (i) analyzing a representative data collection assessing edaphoclimatic variables and SOC stocks from field experiments under different managements in arable and woody crops, (ii) providing evidence on SOC storage potential, (iii) identifying the biophysical and management variables associated with SOC storage, and (iv) recommending a set of mitigation strategies for global change. Average storage rates amounted to 15 and 80 Mg C ha−1 year−1 × 1000 in arable and woody crops, respectively. Results show that application of organic amendments led to significantly higher SOC storage rates than conventional management, with average values about 1.5 times higher in woody than in arable crops (93 vs. 63 Mg C ha−1 year−1 × 1000). Results were influenced by the initial SOC content, experiment duration, soil texture, and climate regime. The relatively lower levels of SOC in Mediterranean soils, and the high surface covered by woody crops, may reflect the high potential of these regions to achieving significant increases in SOC storage at the global scale.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Carbon (C) sequestration is the fixation and storage of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere to a soil unit in the form of biotic (e.g., plants and plant residues) and Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) pools (Olson et al. 2014; Chenu et al. 2018). C storage is the rate of SOC stocks increase over time, and in some cases does not imply a removal of CO2 from the atmosphere but rather a transfer of C from one pool to another in the biosphere, as in the case of manure and other exogenous organic material addition (Powlson et al. 2011; Corbeels et al. 2018). Anyhow, the two terms are often used as synonymous (Chenu et al. 2018).
C storage in agricultural soils can potentially contribute to climate change mitigation, provided that global measures to limit the increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations deriving from fossil fuel consumption and land use change are implemented (FAO 2017a, b). Moreover, it is widely accepted that a sound management of agricultural soils through improved crop rotations, managing crop residues, application of organic amendments, and reduced or no-tillage practices leads to multiple benefits on SOC storage, crop yields, runoff, water erosion, water quality, biodiversity, and mitigating the effects of extreme climatic events (Lal 2010; Stout et al. 2016).
Earlier studies estimate SOC stock as about 1550 Gt C (1 Gt = 1015 g) to 1-m depth in natural soils (Lal 2008), in comparison with 4130 Gt C in fossil fuels, 560 Gt C in vegetation, and 760 Gt of CO2-C in atmosphere. Therefore, changes in SOC stock can have profound implications for climate change (Smith et al. 2008).
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has provided the guidelines for measuring and reporting national SOC stock and greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories (IPCC 2006). Calculation approaches for reporting SOC changes are increasingly more accurate and complex: Tier 1, the simplest to be used, based on equations and default parameter values to calculate the changes in SOC stocks over a finite period of time (commonly 20 years); Tier 2, similar to Tier 1 but based on country- or region-specific data; Tier 3 based on higher order methods and resolutions, that include models and inventory measurement systems, repeated over time, possibly disaggregated at the sub-national level.
Recently, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) organized the Global Symposium on Soil Organic Carbon (GSOC17), held at FAO headquarters in Rome (Italy), and attended by representatives of FAO member states, organizing institutions, the private sector and civil society, as well as scientists and practitioners. Participants worked together for the common goal of appropriate SOC management as part of overall sustainable soil management within the climate change mitigation and adaptation, sustainable development, Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN), and food security agendas (FAO 2017c). The final recommendations aimed at supporting the development of policies and actions to encourage the implementation of soil and land management strategies that foster the protection, sequestration, measurement, mapping, monitoring, and reporting of SOC. Although IPCC Tier 1 reference values are still used in many countries, it was recommended to develop national reference SOC stock values to move to Tier 2. Anyhow, many countries will need capacity development and training to support such activities, as well as adequate data management capacities and facilities.
However, monitoring or mapping SOC can be challenging, due to the complexity of the SOC dynamics. In fact, SOC stocks decrease significantly (and often rapidly) in response to (i) changes in land cover and land use (e.g., deforestation, intensification of farmland systems, conversion of permanent crops and pasture to arable crops, urban expansion) and (ii) unsustainable agricultural practices, such as deep tillage, excessive use of agrochemicals, reduced addition of external organic C, and removal of crop residues (Chenu et al. 2018). Even soil carbon pools in deep soil layers, previously considered resilient to degradation, have demonstrated to be highly vulnerable to environmental or anthropogenic changes, contributing to net CO2 land-atmosphere exchange. Mathieu et al. (2015) and Bernal et al. (2016) have documented the role of temperature, climate aridity, soil properties, and cultivation patterns in shaping rates of organic matter turnover in topsoil, while deep soil carbon was more affected by soil type than by climate regime.
SOC stocks may also be positively affected by afforestation, retention of crop residues, direct addition of external organic C, other land management activities (e.g., minimum or zero tillage), and land uses (e.g., perennial pastures, natural revegetation of abandoned agricultural land) that decrease the breakdown of soil organic matter (Minasny et al. 2017). The incorporation of crop residues, such as cereal straw or cover crops, is an important measure to maintain or increase SOC stocks, especially in rainfed cropping systems (Lugato et al. 2014). Similarly to crop residues, external organic C applied to soils (e.g., organic manure, compost, digestate, black carbon, or biochar) will be subjected both to degradation, with CO2 release by heterotrophic respiration, and humification processes (Kuzyakov et al. 2000; Diacono and Montemurro 2010).
Climate change is expected to have relevant impacts on SOC dynamics. Rising atmospheric CO2 concentration could increase biomass production and crop residues returned to soils. However, increasing temperatures could reduce SOC by accelerating microbial decomposition. In this regard, the 4 per 1000 initiative “Soils for Food Security and Climate” launched by French Government in 2015 during the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 21st Conference of the Parties in Paris (http://4p1000.org/) is a voluntary action plan aimed at supporting states and non-governmental stakeholders in their efforts towards a better management of SOC in agricultural soils, and to reach a 4‰ annual growth rate of SOC stocks in the top 40 cm of soils (0.4% per year) as a compensation for the global emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) by anthropogenic sources and limiting global warming to 2 °C (Minasny et al. 2017; Baveye et al. 2018). With this aim, considering that the annual GHG emissions from fossil fuel combustion for 2004–2013 are 8.9 Gt C (Le Quéré et al. 2015) and with a global estimate of soil C stock to 2 m of soil depth of 2400 Gt (Batjes 2014), the ratio between emission target and SOC stock (8.9/2400) would be 0.4% or 4‰ (4 per 1000).
The initiative aims to demonstrate that agriculture can provide opportunities for climate change mitigation, while ensuring food security with farming methods that match local conditions (e.g., agroecology, agroforestry, conservation agriculture). The initiative is part of the framework of the Lima-Paris Action Agenda (LPAA) and is linked with multiple Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) adopted by the United Nations in 2015, particularly with Target 2.4 (improving land and soil quality), Target 15.3 (achieving a land degradation neutral world), and Goal 13 “Climate action” to combat climate change and its impacts, providing C storage and GHG regulation (Lal 2016) and soil functioning as C pool (European Commission 2006).
Mediterranean climate occurs in five regions of the world: the Mediterranean Basin, the Cape Region of South Africa, Southwestern and South Australia, California, and Central Chile, mainly at latitudes between 35° and 42°. The climate is mild or moderately cold, with humid winters and warm dry summers (Cowling et al. 2005); thus, average soil temperatures are higher than in colder climates, with an expected negative impact on SOC content. A relatively vast set of empirical studies across the world assessed SOC storage rates, but evidence for the Mediterranean climate is quite limited. Recommended Management Practices (RMPs) for increasing SOC in Mediterranean cropping systems were widely studied by Aguilera et al. (2013), and particularly in woody crops by Vicente-Vicente et al. (2016, 2017). The effect of soil tillage on SOC storage was studied with a meta-analysis on global data by Luo et al. (2010), as a function of carbon inputs from crops by Virto et al. (2012), and with a data mining approach by Francaviglia et al. (2017) addressing specific issues relative to the Mediterranean basin. Arable and permanent crops, grasslands, pasture, and forests were studied at national level in France (Arrouays et al. 2002; Chenu et al. 2014; Chen et al. 2018b), and arable crops under conservation agriculture in Spain under maritime and continental climates (González-Sánchez et al. 2012). General reviews on different factors affecting SOC storage rates include tillage and crop rotations (West and Post 2002), crop rotation diversification (McDaniel et al. 2014), and cover crops (Poeplau and Don 2015).
Thus, the combined effects of land use and soil/crop management on SOC storage are a research priority, and the choice of improved agricultural practices should be supported by field research demonstrating the contribution of different management systems to increase soil SOC stock across regions and cropping systems.
To our knowledge, the number of comparisons and studies of the present review (235 from 72 references) is higher than other similar studies in Mediterranean conditions, such as Aguilera et al. (2013) with 174 comparisons from 79 references in both arable and woody crops and Vicente-Vicente et al. (2016) with 144 comparisons from 51 references in woody crops. Based on this perspective, this is indeed the first study assessing the achievement of 4 per 1000 objective in agricultural soils under Mediterranean conditions, and the aims were as follows: (i) analyzing a representative collection of earlier studies measuring environmental/soil variables and SOC stocks from field experiments in Mediterranean regions under different land use and land management systems, (ii) to provide evidence on SOC storage potential to achieve the 4‰ objective in the Mediterranean climate, (iii) to identify the biophysical and management variables most associated with SOC storage in Mediterranean conditions, and (iv) to recommend a set of most promising mitigation strategies for global change.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Literature review and data selection criteria
We collected and analyzed empirical studies in arable and woody crops, carried out in countries under Mediterranean climate and published until February 2017 (S1). Experiments performed in controlled environments (greenhouse or laboratory) were excluded. The selected studies considered pairwise comparisons between RMPs and conventional management. To be included in the database, studies had to have a duration of at least 3 years. For studies that included more than one treatment, all the treatments were included in the database. The literature survey was conducted using SCOPUS database, searching two fields in the title, abstract, or keywords of the article: “Mediterranean” AND “soil organic carbon” OR “soil organic matter.” Literature cited in the selected articles was further examined for collecting more studies only if they met the adopted criteria.
A total of 235 comparisons from 72 references and 76 sites were available from field experiments carried out in France (2), Greece (2), Italy (28), Morocco (1), Portugal (2), South Africa (2), Spain (36), Syria (1), Turkey (1), and the USA (1).
Sites were located between 32° 64′ and 45° 38′ latitude N, 31° 35′ and 33° 50′ latitude S, altitude − 2–990 m a.s.l., with mean annual temperature (MAT) and rainfall (MAP) in the range 10.9–19.9 °C and 139–1178 mm, respectively (S2, S3). According to the aridity index given by AI = P/T + 10 (De Martonne 1926), sites presented the following climate regimes: strongly arid (1), arid (7), semiarid (23), sub-humid (34), and humid (15). Data were organized in a dataset containing basic environmental variables (elevation, temperature, rainfall), soil variables (pH, particle size distribution, and texture group), soil sampling depth (up to 40 cm in arable crops and 60–70 cm in woody crops), length of the field experiment (years), and initial and final soil organic carbon stocks (SOCi and SOCf).
Our analysis was restricted to croplands (n = 235), excluding permanent grassland and forests. Arable crops (n = 120) and woody crops (n = 115) were both examined. Arable crops included in this study were alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), corn (Zea mays L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.), forages, globe artichoke (Cynara cardunculus L. var. scolymus), legumes, horticultural crops, oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.), sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), soybean (Glycine max L.), sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Woody crops considered were restricted to almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.), apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.), kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis Planch.), olive grove (Olea europea L.), orange (Citrus sinensis L.), peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch), and vineyard (Vitis vinifera L.).
Information on soil management (minimum tillage, no tillage, tillage), rotation types in arable crops (monoculture, 2 years, ≥ 3 years), fertilization management (detailed type of input), and fertilization group (mineral, mixed, none, organic) for the two land uses are shown in Table 1.
Carbon storage rate (CSR) in Mg C ha−1 year−1 was derived for the soil depth reported in each experiment by the equation:
and CSR in Mg C ha−1 year−1 × 1000 was calculated with the equation:
where SOCf and SOCi are final and initial SOC stocks (Mg C ha−1) and years is experiment’s length.
Many studies did not report the bulk density (BD in Mg m−3) required to calculate SOC stocks, and missing values were calculated from SOC (g C kg−1) with the equation proposed by Aguilera et al. (2013) for Mediterranean soils:
No-tillage soil management was the most represented category in woody crops (74 comparisons) and tillage in arable crops (67 comparisons). Rotation types in arable crops were almost equally represented (41 to 43 comparisons each). Organic type of input was predominant in woody crops (79 comparisons), while mineral and mixed types of input were mostly used in arable crops (48 and 53 comparisons, respectively). Mineral and mixed mineral/crop residue inputs were the most represented categories in arable crops (48 and 33 comparisons, respectively); cover crop, mineral + cover crop, and olive mill waste were predominant in woody crops (36, 22, and 15 comparisons, respectively).
2.2 Statistical analyses
A first data analysis was run with the aim to evaluate the impact of selected contextual variables on per 1000 C storage rate using Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric inference (e.g., Salvati 2013; Pili et al. 2017). Results were analyzed by soil attribute, environmental variable, and agricultural management type according to Table 1, and represented by Box-Whisker plots (mean ± standard error). Correlation statistics were based on a non-parametric Spearman rank analysis (Duvernoy et al. 2018), where the p level associated to each correlation coefficient was corrected for multiple comparisons according to Bonferroni’s adjustment (Ceccarelli et al. 2014). The sample size included 17 quantitative variables measured in arable crops and 13 variables in woody crops (Table 2). Statistical analyses were performed using Statistica 7.0 (Statsoft, Tulsa, USA).
3 Results
3.1 Arable crops
Per 1000 C storage rate (Mg ha−1 year−1 × 1000) was significantly different (p = 0.0382) in the different climate aridity regimes (Fig. 1), ranking from sub-humid (34.69, n = 31) to semiarid (12.13, n = 46), arid (5.06, n = 3), and humid (3.94, n = 40). Soil management effect on per 1000 C storage rate (Fig. 2) was significantly different (p = 0.0421) and followed the ranking minimum tillage (22.28, n = 22) > tillage (14.42, n = 67) > no tillage (11.28, n = 31). The effect of fertilization group on per 1000 C storage rate (Fig. 3) was highly significant (p = 0.000), and the ranking was organic (63.24, n = 19) > mixed (10.30, n = 53) > mineral (1.22, n = 48).
Per 1000 C storage rate in relation to the type of fertilization management (Fig. 4) was largely positive in the following categories: compost (334.02), sewage sludge (101.58), and mineral + residues + compost (75.69), but these categories were the less represented (n = 1 to 3). The effect of cover crops on per 1000 C storage rate differed among the different categories: cover crop (24.30, n = 5) > mineral + residues + cover crop (11.94, n = 4) > mineral + cover crop (6.01, n = 9). The effect of manure on per 1000 C storage rate was 18.70 (n = 6), for slurry − 0.07 (n = 2). The most negative effect on per 1000 C storage rate was evidenced for the categories mineral + slurry (− 7.02) and mineral + manure + residues (− 6.22).
The effect of the experiment duration on per 1000 C storage rate (Fig. 5) was highly significant (p = 0.000) and followed the ranking ≤ 5 years (59.89, n = 23), 6–10 years (15.86, n = 9), > 10 years (3.25, n = 88). Among soil variables, texture group (Fig. 6) was weakly significant (p = 0.0765), and the ranking was fine (34.62, n = 27), medium (10.71, n = 66), and coarse (6.09, n = 27).
Spearman rank correlation analysis among per 1000 C storage rate (Mg C ha−1 year−1 × 1000) and selected independent variables are illustrated in Fig. 7. Significant negative coefficients were reported for soil organic C stocks at the beginning of the study period (SOCi), number of survey years, mineral fertilization, depth of sampling, and tillage (conventional). C storage rate increased significantly with temperature and in sites where organic fertilization and no tillage were adopted.
3.2 Woody crops
The effect of fertilization group on per 1000 C storage rate (Fig. 3) was highly significant (p = 0.0004), and the ranking was organic (92.77, n = 79) > mixed (61.66, n = 30) > mineral (11.81, n = 5) > none (− 65.48, n = 1).
Per 1000 C storage rate (Fig. 4) was largely positive (> 100) in the categories mineral + compost and mineral + sludge (364.36, n = 3), residues (242.56, n = 3), and olive mill waste (195.36, n = 15); intermediate (50–100) in the categories mixed solid waste (99.77, n = 2), cover crop + residues (75.19, n = 4), and cover crop (66.43, n = 37); low (0–50) ranging from manure (38.52, n = 1) to mineral + residues (9.43, n = 2); and negative with no fertilization (− 65.48, n = 1).
The effect of the experiment duration in years on per 1000 C storage rate (Fig. 5) was highly significant (p = 0.0023) and higher in the category ≤ 5 years (112.15, n = 56), almost equal in 6–10 years (48.91, n = 37), and > 10 years (49.17, n = 22). These values are higher than those obtained for arable crops (1.87, 3.08, and 15.13 times for ≤ 5, 6–10, and > 10 years, respectively).
Spearman rank correlation coefficients among per 1000 C storage rate (Mg C ha−1 year−1 × 1000) and selected independent variables are illustrated in Fig. 7. Significant negative coefficients were reported for soil organic C stock at the beginning of the study period (SOCi), number of survey years, mineral fertilization, depth of sampling, and vineyard land use. C storage rate increased significantly in sites where organic fertilization and tillage (conventional) were adopted and under olive land use.
3.3 Comparison of arable and woody crops
Average C storage rates were 15.3 and 80.0 Mg C ha−1 year−1 × 1000 in arable and woody crops, respectively, and the lower and upper bound of means (95%) were 6.6–24.0 Mg C ha−1 year−1 × 1000 in arable crops and 60.5–99.5 Mg C ha−1 year−1 × 1000 in woody crops. In both arable and woody crops (Fig. 8), more than 50% of the observations were higher than the objective of 4 per 1000 (59 and 76%, respectively), with ranges − 50 to + 352 and − 65 to + 540 Mg C ha−1 year−1 × 1000, respectively. In addition, for arable crops, a higher proportion of the observations (36%) showed negative per 1000 C storage rates compared to woody crops (7%).
In the case of woody crops, more positive extreme values were found. This was due to the high values found under tillage management, whereas for arable crops, the dispersion of the data was much lower, and the extreme values were found in the minimum tillage management category (Fig. 2a, b). Positive extreme values were found with the application of organic fertilization in both arable and woody crops (Fig. 3a, b), and in both cases, no negative extreme values were found.
4 Discussion
4.1 Influence of the different variables on 4‰ achievement
4.1.1 Tillage and fertilization
Organic fertilization appears to be one of the main drivers increasing the C storage rate in Mediterranean agriculture. Indeed, according to Vicente-Vicente et al. (2016), assessing the influence of some abiotic variables (e.g., temperature and precipitations) is made difficult in soils amended with compost, manure, or other organic fertilizers due to the strong influence of this management which could mask their effect. The high variability observed in our study is supported by Freibauer et al. (2004), who showed that C storage efficiency is affected by different variables, e.g., climate, composition of the added organic materials, amount of SOC, and soil properties. In our analysis, data derive from a wide variety of pedoclimatic and topographic conditions, resulting in a relatively high spatiotemporal variability.
The results for organic fertilization in arable crops are consistent with those found in a meta-analysis of Mediterranean crops by Aguilera et al. (2013), showing carbon increases by 23.5% in soils amended with organic fertilizers compared with soils under conventional management with mineral fertilization. The same authors reported a significant higher C storage rate in those managements applying compost or manure and concluded that the C storage rate will depend mainly on the amount of the organic amendment which is incorporated into the soil. However, the use of some exogenous organic C inputs is strictly linked to the local availability, influenced in turn by the specific socioeconomic features of each area. Thus, for example, some by-products of the industry could be combined with cover crops and crop residue addition (e.g., olive mill waste, wine waste, sewage sludge, municipal wastes, compost). However, location of these industries plays a key role in order to avoid long-distance transportations; thus, the trade-off between the possible C storage increase from using these by-products and indirect CO2 emissions for transportation should be assessed.
With regard to the C storage rate obtainable by cover crop management, it will depend on the Net Primary Production (NPP), which at the same time has an annual variability depending on pedoclimatic conditions. In this respect, Vicente-Vicente et al. (2017) found a great spatial variability of aboveground biomass production and carbon inputs from the spontaneous vegetation cover, within the same year, in olive orchards in Southern Spain. According to Peregrina et al. (2014b) carbon inputs from cover crops also differ between cereal and legume plant covers, being often lower in cereal plant covers due to the lower production of biomass. Therefore, soil properties and climatic conditions will affect especially those managements implementing cover crops (Vicente-Vicente et al. 2017).
In Mediterranean woody crops, no-tillage management is associated very often to the use of herbicides without application of organic inputs; conversely, minimum tillage and tillage are adopted when organic fertilizers are applied, with no or lower herbicide application rates. Our results show that a combination of different RMPs in Mediterranean croplands, such as minimum tillage in arable crops and tillage in woody crops, together with the incorporation of organic amendments, would lead to a relatively fast increase in the SOC content. These practices are also cost-effective, since they are relatively easy to be implemented by farmers at low cost. From a cultural and socioeconomic context, the requirement of specific machinery can encourage farmers to associate in cooperatives, particularly if no-tillage is not a traditional practice in the area. Very often in woody crops, no-tillage systems, associated to the excessive application of herbicides, lead to higher erosion rates due to the lack of vegetation cover (Gómez et al. 2009). But this is the worst combination that should be avoided, and mechanical weed mowing would be preferred to decrease soil erosion and depletion of SOC (Soriano et al. 2012). Considering other possible synergies and joint benefits, reduced or no-tillage systems also positively affect soil compaction, ion retention, exchange and buffering capacity, water balance and retention, and aggregate stability (Brevik et al. 2002; Six et al. 2002; Keesstra et al. 2012; Cerdá et al. 2014; García-Díaz et al. 2016). In addition, a reduced tillage intensity following the incorporation of the organic fertilizers usually improves soil biological and biochemical processes, offering a valuable option in soils with very low SOC content (Alguacil et al. 2014; Laudicina et al. 2016).
Per 1000 C storage rates in relation to fertilization management were higher in woody crops compared with arable crops. In particular, we found a C storage rate about 1.5 times higher in woody crops than in arable crops when applying organic fertilizers (93 vs. 63 Mg C ha−1 year−1 × 1000). In addition, we found higher positive extreme values of SOC storage rate in woody crops, very often combined with tillage since in this case, the tillage is used to incorporate the organic inputs to the soil faster than when they are left on the soil surface. Arable crops are mainly based on annual cycles of tillage and sowing, whereas woody crops are perennial and soil disturbance is lower (Vicente-Vicente et al. 2016). Moreover, the wider inter-row area of the woody crops can be occupied by cover crops, thus allowing the growth of a green manure which is incorporated into the soil when harvesting, and also contributes to increase the organic C through rhizodeposition (Kuzyakov and Domanski 2000; Ludwig et al. 2007). As a result, woody crops showed an average C storage rate about five times higher than that obtained for arable crops (15 vs. 80 Mg C ha−1 year−1 × 1000).
4.1.2 Climate regimes
The significant effect of climate regimes was also highlighted by Vicente-Vicente et al. (2016) and Francaviglia et al. (2017), who found a lower C storage rate under arid Mediterranean climate regimes compared to semiarid and sub-humid conditions. In these soils, water scarcity in rainfed agriculture and soil fertility limitations may decrease C storage potential (Post et al. 1996). Furthermore, the low water availability for plants does not allow the optimal growth of cover crops in woody crops, thus reducing the differences in SOC storage rate between conventional and cover crop managements (Vicente-Vicente et al. 2016).
4.1.3 Duration of the experiment
The effect of the duration of the experiment on per 1000 C storage rate is not surprising, since changes in SOC are expected to be stronger immediately after changing the management, and thereafter ramp down until a new equilibrium is reached (Six et al. 2002; Smith 2005; Johnston et al. 2009; Powlson et al. 2012). In this line, in a meta-analysis considering Mediterranean woody crops, Vicente-Vicente et al. (2016) found that the C storage rate was 1.7 times higher in the first 5 years of the experiments than in the following years and would be higher than that of arable crops for most of the sustainable management practices. Poulton et al. (2018) indicated that SOC accumulation can be represented by an asymptotic curve and reported a decrease in per mille storage rate in several long-term field experiments at Rothamsted Research (UK). In particular, Broadbalk experiment was started in 1843 with winter wheat, and results following the application of farmyard manure indicated a fast initial SOC accumulation rate of 43‰ in the first 20 years of the experiment, an annual rate still above 4‰ from 20 to 60 years followed by a decline towards a new equilibrium. Other studies support this finding (e.g., West and Post 2002; Rui and Zhang 2010; Poeplau and Don 2015), but SOC increases can be reversed if the land management practice (e.g., reduced tillage, organic fertilization) is not maintained (Freibauer et al. 2004; Powlson et al. 2011). In ley-arable rotations often adopted in cold temperate climates of Europe, part of the SOC accumulated during the ley period is lost with soil tillage and further decomposes during the arable phase, though with an overall SOC increase in the long term compared with continuous arable cropping (Johnston et al. 2009). In semiarid conditions typical of the warm temperate climates of the Mediterranean basin, a plot experiment on no-tillage and pig slurry application during a wheat-barley rotation included in the present analysis (Álvaro-Fuentes et al. 2014) indicated a decreasing trend of per mille SOC storage rate, equal to 54, 29, 18, and 12‰, respectively, after 1, 4, 11, and 20 years following the conversion from conventional tillage.
4.1.4 Soil variables
Among soil variables, the results for texture in arable crops fit with the widely accepted theory that the SOC content depends on the amount of silt and clay particles (Hassink 1997) due to the chemical protection which is mainly a consequence of the chemical interactions between clay minerals and the organic matter (Six et al. 2002).
The initial SOC content (SOCi) was significantly negatively correlated with C storage rate. This might be due to the lower capacity of the soil to accumulate C as “protected organic C” in some SOC fractions (e.g., physically and chemically protected pool, Six et al. 2002; Vicente-Vicente et al. 2017) as the SOC content of these fractions increases. Chen et al. (2018a) reported that SOC sequestration potential increases with an increase in fine fraction content and was highest for croplands. Therefore, considering the C saturation deficit, i.e., the difference between the theoretical maximum capacity of the soil to accumulate C as protected SOC and the current level (Six et al. 2002), achieving the 4‰ target would play an important role, to be addressed mainly in arable crops that are more SOC depleted due to frequent tillage operations and in coarse textured soils.
4.2 Implications of findings to the Mediterranean agriculture, the 4‰ achievement, and future researches
The incorporation of organic amendments (compost, green manure, residues, etc.) led to significantly higher values of per 1000 C storage rate compared with the conventional management or the use of mineral fertilizers, both in arable and woody crops. However, Mediterranean woody crops have demonstrated to be more sensitive to changes in land management than arable crops, although pedoclimatic conditions may strongly affect C storage dynamics.
Our results shed further light on a particularly relevant issue for Mediterranean and dryland ecosystems, where inputs of organic matter in soils are low and mostly rely on crop residues, while losses are high due to climatic and anthropogenic factors such as intensive and non-conservative farming practices (Farina et al. 2011). In addition, due to SOC depletion, Mediterranean soils are more prone to land degradation, which is often coupled with intense soil erosion (Muñoz-Rojas et al. 2015) arising from extensive land use changes in the last decades (Anaya-Romero et al. 2011).
Future research should help policy makers in Mediterranean areas to assess the extent of cultivated land area offering the best potential to meet the 4‰ target, considering the more favorable soil and climate conditions and the opportunities offered by the local availability of organic fertilizers such as manure or by-products of the agroindustry sector (e.g., olive or wine mill wastes).
Scientific research can additionally help to fill in some gaps existing in basic knowledge, mainly related to the lack of specific field experiments monitoring the long-term effectiveness of different management strategies on both SOC changes and greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, CH4, and N2O). In this regard, future researches should be focused on assessing the 4 per 1000 target together with nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, since some previous works have suggested an increase in N2O emissions while increasing SOC stocks (e.g., van Groenigen et al. 2017; Lugato et al. 2018). For instance, no-tillage management enhances SOC storage due to the combined effect of crop residue retention on the surface and the lower SOC decomposition, but the increased soil moisture content due to the lower crop evapotranspiration reduces soil aeration, and can enhance the denitrification process particularly in fine-textured soils, resulting in higher N2O emissions compared to conventional tillage (Rochette et al. 2008). Given the close association between N inputs and N2O emissions, the best practices suitable for C storage can be combined with soil management strategies to reduce N2O emissions, such as improving N use efficiency by reducing inputs or by better matching applications (timing and amount) to plant demand (Snyder et al. 2014). While the main feedback of N fertilization is to increase crop yields, SOC storage has positive effects both on soil quality and crop productivity, i.e., management systems with higher C returns provide more C to the soil, supply more nutrients back to the crop, and increase crop productivity (Sanderman et al. 2017).
However, most of these studies have not been carried out under Mediterranean conditions. Recently, Cayuela et al. (2017) demonstrated that in Mediterranean conditions, the average N2O emission factor, i.e., the percentage of N fertilizer applied emitted on site, would be much lower (0.5%) than that proposed by the IPCC (default value of 1%). In detail, N2O emission factor was lower in rainfed crops (0.27%) than irrigated crops (0.63%), with drip irrigation systems (0.51%) than sprinkler irrigation (0.91%), and under winter cereals (0.26%) than summer crops such as maize (0.83%). Therefore, future studies should assess N2O emissions in soils under RMPs aimed at achieving 4 per 1000 target, focusing on irrigation and fertilization in summer crops and considering specific Mediterranean pedoclimatic conditions.
Besides enteric fermentation and livestock management, methane (CH4) emissions from soil management occur under anaerobic conditions from waterlogged soils, i.e., wetlands, peatlands, and rice paddies, that are the largest sources of methane emissions; by contrast, aerobic soils tend to act as sinks for CH4, and have a positive impact on climate regulation (Le Mer and Roger 2001). Since wetlands are often unmanaged, most mitigation options have been proposed for rice grown under flooded conditions and include draining the fields during the growing season, improved water management in the bare season to avoid waterlogging, selection of cultivars with low exudation rates, fertilization management, and timing and composting of organic residue additions (Smith et al. 2008).
On the other hand, as a next step, the effects of different soil and crop managements on total SOC and SOC fractions at different protective levels—unprotected and physically, chemically, and biochemically protected (Six et al. 2002)—could be further explored with a similar approach.
5 Conclusions
Our literature analysis showed that both arable and woody crops have a large potential to increase SOC storage rates above 4 per 1000 target under Mediterranean climate due to the relatively lower levels of SOC in soils. For arable crops, mitigation strategies should particularly address soils with a coarse texture and adopt minimum or no-tillage soil management, the use of organic fertilizers, and the retention of crop residues in the field. The very high potential of woody crops to increase SOC storage rates, coupled with the high surface of soil covered by these crops, suggests that their potential to achieve the 4 per 1000 may be very important. Mitigation strategies in woody crops should include organic fertilization (e.g., the valorization of olive mill waste, a challenging opportunity for the sustainable and competitive development of olive oil industry in Mediterranean countries), the adoption of cover crops or allowing the growth of a plant cover of weeds in the inter-row area, and minimum tillage with no or lower herbicide application rates. In woody crops under no-tillage management, mitigation strategies should include mechanical weed mowing in sloping lands to decrease soil erosion and SOC depletion. Results also may reflect the high potential of Mediterranean regions across all continents to contribute to a significant increase in SOC storage at the global scale. But SOC storage is non-permanent; thus, to implement a meaningful carbon storage policy on agricultural land, both the land use or land management change must be maintained. In this sense, policymakers should consider the implementation of economic incentives to adopt and maintain RMPs.
References
Aguilera E, Lassaletta L, Gattinger A, Gimeno BS (2013) Managing soil carbon for climate change mitigation and adaptation in Mediterranean cropping systems: a meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 168:25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.02.003
Anaya-Romero M, Pino R, Moreira JM, Muñoz-Rojas M, de la Rosa D (2011) Analysis of soil capability versus land-use change by using CORINE Land Cover and MicroLEIS in Southern Spain. Int Agrophys 25:395–398
Arrouays D, Balesdent J, Germon GC, Jayet PA, Soussana J F, Stengel P (2002) Contribution à la lutte contre l’effet de serre. Stocker du carbone dans les sols agricoles de France? An assessment report compiled by the French Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA) on the request of the French Ministry for Ecology and Sustainable Development. Paris, France pp 32
Batjes NH (2014) Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur J Soil Sci 65:10–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12114_2
Baveye PC, Berthelin J, Tessier D, Lemaire G (2018) The “4 per 1000” initiative: a credibility issue for the soil science community? Geoderma 309:118–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.005
Bernal B, McKinley DC, Hungate BA, White PM, Mozdzer TJ, Megonigal JP (2016) Limits to soil carbon stability; deep, ancient soil carbon decomposition stimulated by new labile organic inputs. Soil Biol Biochem 98:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.04.007
Brevik EC, Fenton T, Moran L (2002) Effect of soil compaction on organic carbon amounts and distribution, south-Central Iowa. Environ Pollut 116:137–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00266-4
Cayuela ML, Aguilera E, Sanz-Cobena A, Adams DC, Abalos D, Barton L, Ryals R, Silver WL, Alfaro MA, Valentini R, Pappa A, Smith P, Garnier J, Billen G, Bouwman L, Bondeau A, Lassaletta L (2017) Direct nitrous oxide emissions in Mediterranean climate cropping systems: emission factors based on a meta-analysis of available measurement data. Agric Ecosyst Environ 238:25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.006
Ceccarelli T, Bajocco S, Perini L, Salvati L (2014) Urbanisation and land take of high quality agricultural soils—exploring long-term land use changes and land capability in northern Italy. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8(1):181–192
Cerdá A, Giménez Morera A, García Orenes F, Morugán A, González Pelayo O, Pereira P, Novara A, Brevik EC (2014) The impact of abandonment of traditional flood irrigated citrus orchards on soil infiltration and organic matter. In: Arnáez J, González-Sampériz P, Lasanta T, Valero-Garcés BL (eds) Geoecología, Cambio Ambiental Y Paisaje. Homenaje Al Profesor José María García Ruiz. Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología, Zaragoza, pp 267–276
Chen S, Arrouays D, Angers DA, Martin MP, Walter C (2018a) Soil carbon stocks under different land uses and the applicability of the soil carbon saturation concept. Soil Tillage Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.11.001
Chen S, Martin MP, Saby NPA, Walter C, Angers DA, Arrouays D (2018b) Fine resolution map of top- and subsoil carbon sequestration potential in France. Sci Total Environ 630:389–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.209
Chenu C, Klumpp K, Bispo A, Angers D, Colnenne C, Metay A (2014) Stocker du carbone dans les sols agricoles: évaluation de leviers d’action pour la France. Innovations Agronomiques 37:23–37
Chenu C, Angers DA, Barré P, Derrien D, Arrouays D, Balesdent J (2018) Increasing organic stocks in agricultural soils: knowledge gaps and potential innovations. Soil Tillage Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.04.011
Corbeels M, Cardinael R, Naudin K, Guibert H, Torquebiau E (2018) The 4 per 1000 goal and soil carbon storage under agroforestry and conservation agriculture systems in sub-Saharan Africa. Soil Tillage Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.02.015
Cowling RM, Ojeda F, Lamont B, Rundel PW, Lechmere-Oertel R (2005) Rainfall reliability, a neglected factor in explaining convergence and divergence of plant traits in fire-prone Mediterranean-climate ecosystems. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 14:509–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822X.2005.00166.x
De Martonne E (1926) Une nouvelle fonction climatologique: l’indice d’aridite. Meteorologie 2:449–458
Diacono M, Montemurro F (2010) Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:401–422. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009040
Duvernoy I, Zambon I, Sateriano A, Salvati L (2018) Pictures from the other side of the fringe: urban growth and peri-urban agriculture in a post-industrial city (Toulouse, France). J Rural Stud 57:25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.10.007
European Commission (2006) Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection, COM 231 Final, Brussels
FAO (2017a) Voluntary guidelines for sustainable soil management. Food and agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
FAO (2017b) Soil organic carbon: the hidden potential. Food and agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
FAO (2017c) Unlocking the potential of soil organic carbon. Outcome document of the Global Symposium on Soil Organic Carbon. 21-23 March 2017, FAO Headquarters - Rome, Italy
Farina R, Seddaiu G, Orsini R, Steglich E, Roggero PP, Francaviglia R (2011) Soil carbon dynamics and crop productivity as influenced by climate change in a rainfed cereal system under contrasting tillage using EPIC. Soil Tillage Res 112:36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.11.002
Francaviglia R, Di Bene C, Farina R, Salvati L (2017) Soil organic carbon sequestration and tillage systems in the Mediterranean Basin: a data mining approach. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 107:125–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-016-9820-z
Freibauer A, Rounsevell M, Smith P, Verhagen J (2004) Carbon sequestration in the agricultural soils of Europe. Geoderma 122:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.021
García-Díaz A, Allas RB, Gristina L, Cerdá A, Pereira P, Novara A (2016) Carbon input threshold for soil carbon budget optimization in eroding vineyards. Geoderma 271:144–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.02.020
González-Sánchez EJ, Ordóñez-Fernández R, Carbonell-Bojollo R, Veroz-Gonzalez O, Gil-Ribes JA (2012) Meta-analysis on atmospheric carbon capture in Spain through the use of conservation agriculture. Soil Tillage Res 122:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.03.001
Hassink J (1997) The capacity of soils to preserve organic C and N by their association with clay and silt particles. Plant Soil 191:77–87. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004213929699
IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Volume 4 Agriculture, forestry and other land use. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (available at: http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol4.html)
Johnston AE, Poulton PR, Coleman K (2009) Soil organic matter: its importance in sustainable agriculture and carbon dioxide fluxes. Adv Agron 101:2–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)00801-8
Keesstra SD, Geissen V, van Schaik L, Mosse K, Piiranen S (2012) Soil as a filter for groundwater quality. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4:507–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.007
Kuzyakov Y, Domanski G (2000) Carbon input by plants into the soil. Review. J Plant Nutr and Soil Sci 163(4):421–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2624(200008)
Kuzyakov Y, Friedel JK, Stahr K (2000) Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1485–1498. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00084-5
Lal R (2008) Carbon sequestration. Philos T Roy Soc B 363:815–830. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2185
Lal R (2010) Managing soils and ecosystems for mitigating anthropogenic carbon emissions and advancing global food security. Bioscience 60:708–721. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.9.8
Lal R (2016) Soil health and carbon management. Food Energy Secur 5(4):212–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.96
Le Mer J, Roger P (2001) Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: a review. Eur J Soil Biol 37:25–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01067-6
Le Quéré C, Moriarty R, Andrew RM, Peters GP, Ciais P, Friedlingstein P, Jones SD, Sitch S, Tans P, Arneth A, Boden TA, Bopp L, Bozec Y, Canadell JG, Chini LP, Chevallier F, Cosca CE, Harris I, Hoppema M, Houghton RA, House JI, Jain AK, Johannessen T, Kato E, Keeling RF, Kitidis V, Klein Goldewijk K, Koven C, Landa CS, Landschützer P, Lenton A, Lima ID, Marland G, Mathis JT, Metzl N, Nojiri Y, Olsen A, Ono T, Peng S, Peters W, Pfeil B, Poulter B, Raupach MR, Regnier P, Rödenbeck C, Saito S, Salisbury JE, Schuster U, Schwinger J, Séférian R, Segschneider J, Steinhoff T, Stocker BD, Sutton AJ, Takahashi T, Tilbrook B, Van Der Werf GR, Viovy N, Wang YP, Wanninkhof R, Wiltshire A, Zeng N (2015) Global carbon budget 2014. Earth Syst Sci Data 7:47–85. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-7-47-2015
Ludwig B, Schulz E, Rethemeyer J, Merbach I, Flessa H (2007) Predictive modelling of C dynamics in the long-term fertilization experiment at Bad Lauchstädt with the Rothamsted carbon model. Eur J Soil Sci 58:1155–1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00907.x
Lugato E, Bampa F, Panagos P, Montanarella L, Jones A (2014) Potential carbon sequestration of European arable soils estimated by modelling a comprehensive set of management practices. Glob Chang Biol 20:3557–3567. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12551
Lugato E, Leip A, Jones A (2018) Mitigation potential of soil carbon management overestimated by neglecting N2O emissions. Nat Clim Chang 8:219–223. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0087-z
Luo Z, Wang E, Sun OJ (2010) Can no-tillage stimulate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils? A meta-analysis of paired experiments. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.08.006
Mathieu JA, Hatté C, Balesdent J, Parent É (2015) Deep soil carbon dynamics are driven more by soil type than by climate: a worldwide meta-analysis of radiocarbon profiles. Glob Chang Biol 21(11):4278–4292. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13012
McDaniel MD, Tiemann LK, Grandy AS (2014) Does agricultural crop diversity enhance soil microbial biomass and organic matter dynamics? A meta-analysis. Ecol Appl 24:560–570. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0616.1
Minasny B, Malone BP, McBratney AB, Angers DA, Arrouays D, Chambers A, Chaplot V, Chen Z-S, Cheng K, Das BS, Fielda DJ, Gimona A, Hedley CB, Hong SY, Mandal B, Marchant BP, Martin M, McConkey BG, Mulder VL, O’Rourke S, Richer-de-Forges AC, Odeh I, Padarian J, Paustian K, Pan G, Poggio L, Savin I, Stolbovoy V, Stockmann U, Sulaeman Y, Tsui C-C, Vågen T-G, vanWesemael B, Winowiecki L (2017) Soil carbon 4 per mille. Geoderma 292:59–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.002
Muñoz-Rojas M, Doro L, Ledda L, Francaviglia R (2015) Application of CarboSOIL model to predict the effects of climate change on soil organic carbon stocks in agro-silvo-pastoral Mediterranean management systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 202:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.12.014
Olson KR, Al-Kaisi MM, Lal R, Lowery B (2014) Experimental consideration, treatments, and methods in determining soil organic carbon sequestration rates. Soil Sci Soc Am J 78(2):348–360. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2013.09.0412
Peregrina F, Pérez-Álvarez EP, García-Escudero E (2014b) The short-term influence of aboveground biomass cover crops on C sequestration and β–glucosidase in a vineyard ground under semiarid conditions. Span J Agric Res 12(4):1000–1007. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2014124-5818
Pili S, Grigoriadis E, Carlucci M, Clemente M, Salvati L (2017) Towards sustainable growth? A multi-criteria assessment of (changing) urban forms. Ecol Indic 76:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.008
Poeplau C, Don A (2015) Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils via cultivation of cover crops – a meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 200:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.024
Post WM, King AW, Wullschleger SD (1996) Soil organic matter models and global estimates of soil carbon. In: Powlson DS, Smith P, Smith JU (eds), Evaluation of soil organic matter models. Springer-Verlag, pp 201–222
Poulton P, Johnston J, Macdonald A, White R, Powlson D (2018) Major limitations to achieving “4 per 1000” increases in soil organic carbon stock in temperate regions: evidence from long-term experiments at Rothamsted Research, United Kingdom. Glob Chang Biol 24(6):2563–2584. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14066
Powlson DS, Whitmore AP, Goulding KWT (2011) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: a critical re-examination to identify the true and the false. Eur J Soil Sci 62:42–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01342.x
Powlson DS, Bhogal A, Chambers BJ, Macdonald AJ, Goulding KWT, Whitmore AP (2012) The potential to increase soil carbon stocks through reduced tillage or organic material additions in England and Wales: a case study. Agric Ecosyst Environ 146:23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.10.004
Rochette P, Angers DA, Chantigny MH, Bertrand N (2008) Nitrous oxide emissions respond differently to no-till in a loam and a heavy clay soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72(5):1363–1369. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0371
Rui W, Zhang W (2010) Effect size and duration of recommended management practices on carbon sequestration in paddy field in Yangtze Delta plain of China: a meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 135:199–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.09.010
Salvati L (2013) Monitoring high-quality soil consumption driven by urban pressure in a growing city (Rome, Italy). Cities 31:349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.11.001
Sanderman J, Creamer C, Baisden WT, Farrell M, Fallon S (2017) Greater soil carbon stocks and faster turnover rates with increasing agricultural productivity. Soil 3:1–16. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-3-1-2017
Six J, Conant RT, Paul EA, Paustian K (2002) Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant Soil 241(2):155–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016125726789
Smith P (2005) An overview of the permanence of soil organic carbon stocks: influence of direct human-induced, indirect and natural effects. Eur J Soil Sci 56:673–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2005.00708.x
Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen H, Kumar P, McCarl B, Ogle S, O’Mara F, Rice C, Scholes B, Sirotenko O, Howden M, McAllister T, Pan G, Romanenkov V, Schneider U, Towprayoon S, Wattenbach M, Smith J (2008) Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philos T Roy Soc B 363:789–813. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2184
Snyder CS, Davidson EA, Smith P, Venterea RT (2014) Agriculture: sustainable crop and animal production to help mitigate nitrous oxide emissions. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 9–10:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.005
Stout B, Lal R, Monger C (2016) Carbon capture and sequestration: the roles of agriculture and soils. Int J Agric Biol Eng 9(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.3965/j.ijabe.20160901.2280
van Groenigen JW, van Kessel C, Hungate BA, Oenema O, Powlson DS, van Groeningen KJ (2017) Sequestering soil organic carbon: a nitrogen dilemma. Environ Sci Technol 51:4738–4739. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01427
Vicente-Vicente JL, García-Ruiz R, Francaviglia R, Aguilera E, Smith P (2016) Soil carbon sequestration rates under Mediterranean woody crops using recommended management practices: a meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 235:204–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.024
Vicente-Vicente JL, Gómez-Muñoz B, Hinojosa-Centeno MB, Smith P, Garcia-Ruiz R (2017) Carbon saturation and assessment of soil organic carbon fractions in Mediterranean rainfed olive orchards under plant cover management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 245:135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.05.020
Virto I, Barré P, Burlot A, Chenu C (2012) Carbon input differences as the main factor explaining the variability in soil organic C storage in no-tilled compared to inversion tilled agrosystems. Biogeochemistry 108:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9600-4
West TO, Post WM (2002) Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by tillage and crop rotation: a global data analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:1930–1946. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.1930
Reviewed References
Alguacil M, Torrecillas E, García-Orenes F, Roldán A (2014) Changes in the composition and diversity of AMF communities mediated by management practices in a Mediterranean soil are related with increases in soil biological activity. Soil Biol Biochem 76:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.05.002
Alluvione F, Fiorentino N, Bertora C, Zavattaro L, Fagnano M, Quaglietta Chiarandà F, Grignani C (2013) Short-term crop and soil response to C-friendly strategies in two contrasting environments. Eur J Agron 45:114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2012.09.003
Almagro M, de Vente J, Boix-Fayos C, García-Franco N, Melgares de Aguilar J, González D, Solé-Benet A, Martínez-Mena M (2013) Sustainable land management practices as providers of several ecosystem services under rainfed Mediterraean agroecosystems. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 21(7):1029–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9535-2
Altieri R, Esposito A (2008) Olive orchard amended with two experimental olive mill wastes mixtures: effects on soil organic carbon, plant growth and yield. Bioresour Technol 99:8390–8394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.048
Álvaro-Fuentes J, López MV, Arrúe JL, Moret D, Paustian K (2009) Tillage and cropping effects on soil organic carbon in Mediterranean semiarid agroecosystems: testing the century model. Agric Ecosyst Environ 134(3–4):211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/jagee.2009.07.001
Álvaro-Fuentes J, Plaza-Bonilla D, Arrúe JL, Lampurlanés J, Cantero-Martínez C (2014) Soil organic carbon storage in a no-tillage chronosequence under Mediterranean conditions. Plant Soil 376:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1167-x
Antoniadis V, Tsadilas CD, Samaras V (2010) Trace element availability in a sewage sludge-amended cotton grown Mediterranean soil. Chemosphere 80:1308–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.06.047
Aranda V, Ayora-Cañada M, Domínguez-Vidal A, Martín-García J, Calero J, Delgado R, Verdejo T, González-Vila F (2011) Effect of soil type and management (organic vs. conventional) on soil organic matter quality in olive groves in a semi-arid environment in Sierra Mágina Natural Park (S Spain). Geoderma 164:54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.05.010
Barbera V, Poma I, Gristina L, Novara A, Egli M (2012) Long-term cropping systems and tillage management effects on soil organic carbon stock and steady state level of C sequestration rates in a semiarid environment. Land Degrad Dev 23:82–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.1055
Bessam F, Mrabet R (2003) Long-term changes in soil organic matter under conventional tillage and no-tillage systems in semiarid Morocco. Soil Use Manag 19:139–143. https://doi.org/10.1079/SUM2003181
Blanco-Moure N, Gracia R, Bielsa AC, Lopez MV (2013) Long-term no-tillage effects on particulate and mineral-associated soil organic matter under rainfed Mediterranean conditions. Soil Use Manag 29:250–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12039
Calleja-Cervantes M, Fernández-González A, Irigoyen I, Fernández-López M, Aparicio-Tejo P, Menéndez S (2015) Thirteen years of continued application of composted organic wastes in a vineyard modify soil quality characteristics. Soil Biol Biochem 90:241–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.002
Campanelli G, Canali S (2012) Crop production and environmental effects in conventional and organic vegetable farming systems: the case of a long-term experiment in Mediterranean conditions (Central Italy). J Sustain Agric 36(6):599–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2011.646351
Carbonell-Bojollo R, Ordóñez-Fernández R, Rodríguez-Lizana A (2010) Influence of olive mill waste application on the role of soil as a carbon source or sink. Clim Chang 102:625–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9703-2
Castro J, Fernández-Ondoño E, Rodríguez C, Lallena A, Sierra M, Aguilar J (2008) Effects of different olive-grove management systems on the organic carbon and nitrogen content of the soil in Jaén (Spain). Soil Tillage Res 98:56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2007.10.002
Celette F, Findeling A, Gary C (2009) Competition for nitrogen in an unfertilized intercropping system: the case of an association of grapevine and grass cover in a Mediterranean climate. Eur J Agron 30:41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2008.07.003
Coll P, Cadre EL, Blanchart E, Hinsinger P, Villenave C (2011) Organic viticulture and soil quality: a long-term study in Southern France. Appl Soil Ecol 50:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.07.013
Eleftheriadis A, Turrión MB (2014) Soil microbiological properties affected by land use, management, and time since deforestations and crop establishment. Eur J Soil Biol 62:138–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2014.03.001
Farina R, Coleman K, Whitmore AP (2013) Modification of the RothC model for simulations of soil organic C dynamics in dryland regions. Geoderma 200–201:18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.01.021
Fernández-Romero M, Parras-Alcántara L, Lozano-García B, Clark J, Collins C (2016) Soil quality assessment based on carbon stratification index in different olive grove management practices in Mediterranean areas. Catena 137:449–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.10.019
Fourie J (2012) Soil management in the Breede River valley wine grape region, South Africa. 4. Organic matter and macro-nutrient content of a medium-textured soil. S Afr J Enol Vitic 33:105–114. https://doi.org/10.21548/33-1-1312
Fourie J, Agenbag G, Louw P (2007) Cover crop management in a sauvignon blanc/Ramsey vineyard in the semi-arid Olifants River valley, South Africa. 3. Effect of different cover crop management practices on the organic matter and macro-nutrient contents of a sandy soil. S Afr J Enol Vitic 28:92–100. https://doi.org/10.21548/28-2-1464
Francaviglia R, Farina R, Corti G, De Sanctis G, Roggero PP (2008) Soil carbon stocks, carbon dioxide sequestration and tillage techniques. Ital J Agron 3(3):841–842
Francaviglia R, Coleman K, Whitmore AP, Doro L, Urracci G, Rubino M, Ledda L (2012) Changes in soil organic carbon and climate change—application of the RothC model in agro-silvo-pastoral Mediterranean systems. Agric Syst 112:48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.07.001
Francaviglia R, Baffi C, Nassisi A, Cassinari C, Farina R (2013) Use of the RothC model to simulate soil organic carbon dynamics on a silty-loam inceptisol in northern Italy under different fertilization practices. EQA - international. J Environ Qual 11:17–28. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2281-4485/4085
García-Franco N, Albaladejo J, Almagro M, Martínez-Mena M (2015) Beneficial effects of reduced tillage and green manure on soil aggregation and stabilization of organic carbon in a Mediterranean agroecosystem. Soil Tillage Res 153:66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.05.010
García-Ruiz R, Ochoa V, Viñegla B, Hinojosa M, Peña-Santiago R, Liébanas G, Linares JC, Carreira J (2009) Soil enzymes, nematode community and selected physico-chemical properties as soil quality indicators in organic and conventional olive oil farming: influence of seasonality and site features. Appl Soil Ecol 41:305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.12.004
García-Ruiz R, Ochoa M, Hinojosa M, Gómez-Muñoz B (2012) Improved soil quality after 16 years of olive mill pomace application in olive oil groves. Agron Sustain Dev 32:803–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0080-7
Gómez J, Sobrinho T, Giráldez J, Fereres E (2009) Soil management effects on runoff, erosion and soil properties in an olive grove of southern Spain. Soil Tillage Res 102:5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2008.05.005
Gucci R, Caruso G, Bertolla C, Urbani S, Taticchi A, Esposto S, Mauricio S, Sifola MI, Pellegrini S, Pagliai M, Vignozzi N (2012) Changes of soil properties and tree performance induced by soil management in a high-density olive orchard. Eur J Agron 41:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2012.03.002
Hernández AJ, Lacasta C, Pastor J (2005) Effects of different management practices on soil conservation and soil water in a rainfed olive orchard. Agric Water Manage 77:232–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.09.030
Hernanz JL, López R, Navarrete L, Sánchez-Girón V (2005) Long-term effects of tillage systems and rotations on soil structural stability and organic carbon stratification in semiarid Central Spain. Soil Tillage Res 66:129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00021-1
Hernanz JL, Sánchez-Girón V, Navarrete L (2009) Soil carbon sequestration and stratification in a cereal/leguminous crop rotation with three tillage systems in semiarid conditions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 133:114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.05.009
Laudicina VA, Palazzolo E, Catania P, Vallone M, García AD, Badalucco L (2016) Soil quality indicators as affected by shallow tillage in a vineyard grown in a semiarid Mediterranean environment. Land Degrad Dev 28:1038–1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.258
López-Bellido RJ, Fontán JM, López-Bellido FJ, López-Bellido LL (2010) Carbon sequestration by tillage, rotation, and nitrogen fertilization in a Mediterranean vertisol. Agron J 102:310–318. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2009.0165
López-Fando C, Pardo MT (2009) Changes in soil chemical characteristics with different tillage practices in a semi-arid environment. Soil Tillage Res 104:278–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2009.03.005
Lopez-Fando C, Pardo MT (2011) Soil carbon storage and stratification under different tillage systems in a semi-arid region. Soil Tillage Res 111:224–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.10.011
López-Piñeiro A, Albarrán A, Rato Nunes JM, Barreto C (2008) Short and medium-term effects of two-phase olive mill waste application on olive grove production and soil properties under semiarid mediterranean conditions. Bioresour Technol 99:7982–7987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.051
López-Piñeiro A, Albarrán A, Rato Nunes JM, Peña D, Cabrera D (2011) Long-term impacts of de-oiled two-phase olive mill waste on soil chemical properties, enzyme activities and productivity in an olive grove. Soil Tillage Res 114:175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2011.05.002
Lozano-García B, Parras-Alcántara L (2013a) Land use and management effects on carbon and nitrogen in Mediterranean Cambisols. Agric Ecosyst Environ 179:208–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.07.009
Lozano-García B, Parras-Alcántara L (2013b) Short-term effects of olive mill by-products on soil organic carbon, total N, C:N ratio and stratification ratios in a Mediterranean olive grove. Agric Ecosyst Environ 165:68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.12.007
Lugato E, Berti A, Giardini G (2006) Soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics with and without residue incorporation in relation to different nitrogen fertilisation rates. Geoderma 135:315–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.01.012
Madejòn E, Burgos P, Lòpez R, Cabrera F (2003) Agricultural use of three organic residues: effect on orange production and on properties of a soil of the ‘Comarca Costa de Huelva’ (SW Spain). Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 65:81–288. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022608828694
Mahmoud M, Janssen M, Peth S, Horn R, Lennartz B (2012) Long-term impact of irrigation with olive mill wastewater on aggregate properties in the top soil. Soil Tillage Res 124:24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.04.002
Marinari S, Lagomarsino A, Moscatelli MC, Di Tizio A, Campiglia E (2010) Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization kinetics in organic and conventional three-year cropping systems. Soil Tillage Res 109:161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.06.002
Martiniello P, Annichiarico G, Claps S (2012) Irrigation treatments, water use efficiency and crop sustainability in cereal-forage rotations in Mediterranean environment. Ital J Agron 7(4):312–322. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2012.e41
Mazzoncini M, Canali S, Giovannetti M, Castagnoli M, Tittarelli F, Antichi D, Nannelli R, Cristani C, Bàrberi P (2010) Comparison of organic and conventional stockless arable systems: a multidisciplinary approach to soil quality evaluation. Appl Soil Ecol 44:124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.11.001
Mazzoncini M, Sapkota TB, Bàrberi P, Antichi D, Risaliti R (2011) Long-term effect of tillage, nitrogen fertilization and cover crops on soil organic carbon and total nitrogen content. Soil Tillage Res 114:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2011.05.001
Mazzoncini M, Antichi D, Di Bene C, Risaliti R, Petri M, Bonari E (2016) Soil carbon and nitrogen changes after 28 years of no-tillage management under Mediterranean conditions. Eur J Agron 77:156–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.02.011
Melero S, Ruiz Porras JC, Herencia JF, Madejon E (2006) Chemical and biochemical properties in a silty loam soil under conventional and organic management. Soil Tillage Res 90:162–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.08.016
Melero S, Madejon E, Ruiz JC, Herencia JF (2007) Chemical and biochemical properties of a clay soil under dryland agriculture system as affected by organic fertilization. Eur J Agron 26:327–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.11.004
Montanaro G, Celano G, Dichio B, Xiloyannis C (2010) Effects of soil-protecting agricultural practices on soil organic carbon and productivity in fruit tree orchards. Land Degrad Dev 21:132–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.917
Montanaro G, Tuzio AC, Xylogiannis E, Kolimenakis A, Dichio B (2017) Carbon budget in a Mediterranean peach orchard under different management practices. Agric Ecosyst Environ 238:104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.05.031
Musu V (2013) Stima dell’apporto di sostanza organica al suolo in sistemi per la coltivazione del carciofo in regime biologico. MSc Thesis, University of Sassari, Department of Agronomy, Academic Year 2012–2013
Nardi S, Morari F, Berti A, Tosoni M, Giardini L (2004) Soil organic matter properties after 40 years of different use of organic and mineral fertilisers. Eur J Agron 21:357–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2003.10.006
Nasini L, Gigliotti G, Balduccini M, Federici E, Cenci G, Proietti P (2013) Effect of solid olive-mill waste amendment on soil fertility and olive (Olea europaea L.) tree activity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 164:292–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.10.006
Nieto O, Castro J, Fernández-Ondoño E (2013) Conventional tillage versus cover crops in relation to carbon fixation in Mediterranean olive cultivation. Plant Soil 365:321–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1395-0
Okur N, Altindişli A, Çengel M, Göçmez S, Kayikçioğlu HH (2009) Microbial biomass and enzyme activity in vineyard soils under organic and conventional farming systems. Turk J Agric For 33:413–423. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-0806-23
Olego M, Cordero J, Quiroga M, Sánchez-García M, Álvarez J, Garzón-Jimeno E (2015) Efecto de la incorporación de leonardita en el nivel de materia orgánica y micronutrientes en un suelo inceptisol dedicado a viña (Vitis vinifera L.). Inf Tec Econ Ag 111:210–226. https://doi.org/10.12706/itea.2015.014
Palese A, Vignozzi N, Celano G, Agnelli A, Pagliai M, Xiloyannis C (2014) Influence of soil management on soil physical characteristics and water storage in a mature rainfed olive orchard. Soil Tillage Res 144:96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2014.07.010
Parras-Alcántara L, Lozano-García B (2014) Conventional tillage versus organic farming in relation to soil organic carbon stock in olive groves in Mediterranean rangelands (southern Spain). Solid Earth 5:299–311. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-5-299-2014
Peregrina F, Pérez-Álvarez E, Colina M, García-Escudero E (2012) Cover crops and tillage influence soil organic matter and nitrogen availability in a semi-arid vineyard. Arch Agron Soil Sci 58:S95–S102. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2011.648182
Peregrina F, Pérez-Álvarez EP, García-Escudero E (2014a) Soil microbiological properties and its stratification ratios for soil quality assessment under different cover crop management systems in a semiarid vineyard. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 177:548–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201300371
Piccoli I, Chiarini F, Carletti P, Furlan L, Lazzaro B, Nardi S, Berti A, Sartori L, Dalconi MC, Morari F (2016) Disentangling the effects of conservation agriculture practices on the vertical distribution of soil organic carbon. Evidence of poor carbon sequestration in north- eastern Italy. Agric Ecosyst Environ 230:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.05.035
Ramos M, Benítez E, García P, Robles A (2010) Cover crops under different managements vs. frequent tillage in almond orchards in semiarid conditions: effects on soil quality. Appl Soil Ecol 44:6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.08.005
Repullo M, Carbonell-Bojollo R, Alcántara-Braña C, Rodríguez-Lizana A, Ordóñez-Fernández R (2012) Carbon sequestration potential or residues of different types of cover crops in olive groves under Mediterranean climate. Span J Agric Res 10:649–661. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2012103-562-11
Ruiz-Colmenero M, Bienes R, Eldridge D, Marques M (2013) Vegetation cover reduces erosion and enhances soil organic carbon in a vineyard in the Central Spain. Catena 104:153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2012.11.007
Silvestri N, Mazzoncini M, Tozzini C, Bonari E (2013) La dinamica della sostanza organica del terreno in una omosuccessione di mais condotta secondo modalità alternative di gestione agronomica. XLII Convegno Nazionale della Società Italiana di Agronomia, Reggio Calabria, 32–35
Sombrero A, de Benito A (2010) Carbon accumulation in soil. Ten-year study of conservation tillage and crop rotation in a semi-arid area of castile-Leon, Spain. Soil Tillage Res 107:64–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.02.009
Soriano M, Álvarez S, Landa B, Gómez J (2012) Soil properties in organic olive orchards following different weed management in a rolling landscape of Andalusia, Spain. Renew Agr Food Syst 29:83–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170512000361
Steenwerth K, Belina K (2008) Cover crops enhance soil organic matter, carbon dynamics and microbiological function in a vineyard agroecosystem. Appl Soil Ecol 40:359–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.06.006
Triberti L, Nastri A, Giordani G, Comellini F, Baldoni G, Toderi G (2008) Can mineral and organic fertilization help sequestrate carbon dioxide in cropland? Eur J Agron 29:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2008.01.009
Troccoli A, Maddaluno C, Mucci M, Russo M, Rinaldi M (2015) Is it appropriate to support the farmers for adopting conservation agriculture? Economic and environmental impact assessment. Ital J Agron 10:169–177. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2015.661
Valboa G, Lagomarsino A, Brandi G, Agnelli AE, Simoncini S, Papini R, Vignozzi N, Pellegrini S (2015) Long-term variations in soil organic matter under different tillage intensities. Soil Tillage Res 154:126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.06.017
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 229 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Francaviglia, R., Di Bene, C., Farina, R. et al. Assessing “4 per 1000” soil organic carbon storage rates under Mediterranean climate: a comprehensive data analysis. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 24, 795–818 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-018-9832-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-018-9832-x