Abstract
Research on the effects of Mobile phone radio frequency emissions on biological systems has been focused on noise and vibrations as auditory stressors. This study investigated the potential effects of exposure to mobile phone electromagnetic field radiation, ringtone and vibration on anxiety-like behaviour and oxidative stress biomarkers in albino wistar rats. Twenty five male wistar rats were randomly divided into five groups of 5 animals each: group I: exposed to mobile phone in switched off mode (control), group II: exposed to mobile phone in silent mode, group III: exposed to mobile phone in vibration mode, group IV: exposed to mobile phone in ringtone mode, group V: exposed to mobile phone in vibration and ringtone mode. The animals in group II to V were exposed to 10 min call (30 missed calls for 20 s each) per day for 4 weeks. Neurobehavioural studies for assessing anxiety were carried out 24 h after the last exposure and the animals were sacrificed. Brain samples were collected for biochemical evaluation immediately. Results obtained showed a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in open arm duration in all the experimental groups when compared to the control. A significant decrease (P < 0.05) was also observed in catalase activity in group IV and V when compared to the control. In conclusion, the results of the present study indicates that 4 weeks exposure to electromagnetic radiation, vibration, ringtone or both produced a significant effect on anxiety-like behavior and oxidative stress in young wistar rats.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Global System for Mobile communication (GSM) network in Nigeria has replaced the services of the Nigerian Telecommunications Limited (NITEL). The current estimate in Nigeria is about 113 million connected GSM lines as at January 2012, with most people having more than one line and mobile phone (NCC 2012). In USA, an estimated 285 million people subscribe to mobile phone service while in most parts of Europe, developed parts of Asia, and Australasia, mobile phones are now virtually universal (Eyad 2012). As of 2011, there were more than 5.6 billion users worldwide (Brookes 2012). The use of mobile phone has become indispensable in our daily activities which attracts serious concern surrounding its possible health effects. This is because cell phones emit electromagnetic radiation (EMR) within the radio frequency (RF) range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which encompasses radio waves and microwaves. Mobile phones also use sounds and vibrations as alerting systems (Ahlbom et al. 2004).
In addition to limited studies on mobile phone effects in Nigeria and poor regulative capacity of its importation, there is increased importation of mobile phones that may be emitting more than standard level of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) as well as higher intensity of vibration and sound. Most of the cell phones safety recommendations are based on the basic sinusoidal wave, known as the carrier signal. However the danger does not come from this, but from abrupt ringtone, vibration and the modulated signal that actually carries the data or voice information that operates at higher frequency. The cell receptors respond to these signals, and get excited resulting in the impairment of delicate microtubular connections between the cells (Sareesh et al. 2009). However, more people now go for dual SIM phones due to their cheaper rates and additional SIM capacity. Unfortunately such phones have two transceivers built-in one and therefore emit more electromagnetic radiations, sounds and stronger vibrations than single SIM phones (Janet 2011). The radio waves emitted by a GSM handset can have a peak power of 2 watts, and a US analogue phone has a maximum transmitting power of 3.6 watts. Dual SIM phones may have up to 5 watts. The maximum power output is regulated by the mobile phone standard and by the regulatory agencies in each country (ICNRP 1998).
Studies investigating the effects of Mobile phone radio frequency emissions on biological systems reveal that Mobile phone induced oxidative stress in myocardium, endometrium, semen and semen fructose level in rats (Guney et al. 2007; Agarwal et al. 2009; De Iuliis et al. 2009; Salama et al. 2009). Vibrations of 20 Hz was also found to elevate the levels of plasma corticosterone, brain 5-hydroxy-tryptamine (5-HT) and 5-hydroxy-indole-acetic-acid (5-HIAA) in rats (Makoto and Akira 1983). While some investigators observed altered regional cerebral blood flow and increased permeability of Blood Brain Barrier of subjects exposed to electromagnetic fields from mobile phones (Nittby et al. 2008); others reported the deleterious effects on sleep, short term and spatial memory performances in wistar rats and humans (Hung et al. 2007; Sareesh et al. 2009).
Research has over the years focused on noise and vibrations as auditory stressors that can produce both direct and indirect health effects such as hearing loss with noise exposure higher than 90 decibels and other physiological reactions (Talbott and Thompson 1995). The presence of rattle sound and vibration has been found to increase the human body’s reaction to noise, hence increasing the level of annoyance (Berglund and Hassmén 1996). At higher frequencies, the effects of individual photons of the radiation may become important, as these now have enough energy individually to damage biological molecules (Liebel et al. 2012). Children exposed to road or aircraft noise level were reported to have significantly decreased performances on complex tasks (van Kempen et al. 2009).
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) has been reported to play a crucial role in noise and vibration-induced tissue damage. Over the years, only few studies addressed the combine effects of noise and vibrations on behavioral outcomes and biomarkers of oxidative stress (Makoto and Akira 1983; Meral et al. 2007). Most of the studies carried out on sound and vibration focused on chronic exposure of the whole body systems on vibration or sounds produced by vehicles and machines (Marco 2002; Clark and Sörqvist 2012). The possible effects of vibration and sound produced by smaller machines like mobile phones have over the years received very little attention. Hence, a clear picture on whether EMR alone or in combination with vibration and sound can alter neurobehaviour and oxidative stress biomarkers will unfold more answers to how possibly mobile phone may affect the brain. Therefore, we investigated the anxiety-like behaviour and oxidative stress effects of exposure to Mobile phone electromagnetic field radiation, ringtone and vibration in young wistar albino rats for the period of four weeks.
Materials and methods
Equipment
Five (5) TV 20, Tecno Mobile phones; Portable animal cages; Elevated plus maze; A-weighed sound level meter (Version 2.0, NoiseWatch); Accelerometer (Version 1.5, VR9500. Vibration Research Corporation); Glass mortar; Dissecting sets, Syringes and needles, digital weighing balance.
Animals housing and management
Twenty five (25) Male Wistar albino rats weighing 180–200 g were used for this study. The animals were obtained from the Animal house of Department of Human Physiology, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Kaduna, Nigeria. The animals were housed in standard polypropylene cages in groups of five and allowed free access to feed and water. The rats were allowed to acclimatize to the environment of the behavioural laboratory between 0900 to 1200 h for the period of one week before commencement of the experiment. The mobile phones were introduced to the animal cages during the acclimatization period to exclude the effect of handling, anxiety and novelty on behaviour. All experimental protocols were in accordance with the Ahmadu Bello University Research policy; and ethic and regulations governing the care and use of experimental animals (NIH Publication no. 85–23, revised 1996). The experiments were conducted in a quiet laboratory between hours of 900 h to 1600 h.
Animal groupings
The animals were randomly divided into 5 groups containing 5 rats each.
Group I animals were exposed to mobile phone in switched off mode (Control). Group II were exposed to mobile phone in silent mode (EMR). Group III were exposed to mobile phone in vibration (V) mode. Group IV were exposed to mobile phone in ringtone (R) mode. Group V were exposed to mobile phone in Electromagnetic Radiation, Ringtone and Vibration (EMR + R + V).
The animals in group II to V were exposed to 10 min call (30 missed calls for 20 s each) per day for 4 weeks, keeping a GSM (900/1800/MHz) mobile phone in the cage between 0900 to 1200 h. Animals were allowed to move freely in the cage (21.6″ × 13″ × 7.5″) and the phones were kept in a 4″ × 2″ × 1″ wood-bottom boxes throughout the study period avoiding animal’s contact with phones (Raju et al. 2009; Sareesh et al. 2009).
A test cell phone GSM 900/1800 (model TV 20, Tecno) was used as the source of EMR. The same default ringtone was used in all the phones and using A-weighed sound level meter, the default ringtone was measured to be 76 dB. Vibration was also measured using accelerometer to be 0.47 m/s2. However, we could not regulate interference on signal reception by environmental factors and signals from other vibrating bodies in the experimental area which could rise and fall and consequently affect electromagnetic radiation in our experiment.
Neurobehavioral study
The following anxiogenic studies were carried out for twenty four hours after the last exposure.
Assessment of anxiety-like behaviour using elevated plus maze (EPM)
The elevated plus maze (Lister 1987) was made with black painted woods. It has two closed and two open arms (50 × 10 cm) crossed at an open centre (5 × 5 cm) in plus shape. The closed arms were surrounded by high walls (40 × 10 cm) and the whole apparatus was raised to a height of 50 cm above the floor. The behavioural assessment was conducted in a red illuminated room (60 lx). Throughout the experiment, the observer stayed in the same room 1 m away from the maze. At the start of each trial, animal was placed on the central platform facing the open arm. A digital camera was mounted and the frequency and duration of 8 behavioural parameters were scored during a 5-min test for each rat after which the rat was removed from the maze to its cage. The maze was then cleaned with a solution of 70 % ethyl alcohol and permitted to dry between tests to avoid any olfactory cue.
The following behaviors were recorded:
-
1.
Open arms entries: Frequency with which the animal entered the open arms. All four of the rat’s paws were required to be in the arm to be counted as an entry.
-
2.
Closed arm entries: Frequency with which the animal entered the closed arms. All four of the rat’s paws were required to be in the arm to be counted as an entry.
-
3.
Open arm duration: Length of time the animal spent in the open arms.
-
4.
Closed arm duration: Length of time the animal spent in the closed arms.
-
5.
Head dipping: Frequency with which the animal lowered its head over the sides of the open arm toward the floor.
-
6.
Rearing: Frequency with which the animal stands on hind legs or leans against walls of the maze with front paws.
-
7.
Defecation: Number of fecal boli produced.
Index of open arm avoidance
The Index of open arm avoidance could be drawn from the Trullas and Skolnick, (1993) formula:
Biochemical assessments
Assessment of lipid peroxidation
Samples of the brain were grinded in a cold glass mortar and homogenized (1 g of tissue/9 ml) in 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Malondialdehyde which is a measure of lipid peroxidation was measured quantitatively (Okhawa et al. 1979) using NWLSS™ MDA assay kit (Northwest Life Sciences Specialities, Product NWK-MDA01, Vancouver WA, Specificity: Malondialdihyde, Sensitivity: 0.08 μM). The level of thiobarbituric-acid reactive substance was determined based on the principle of its reaction with MDA to form MDA-TBA2 adduct that absorbs strongly at 532 nm (Janero 1990).
Assessment of antioxidant enzymes
Superoxide dismutase activity
Samples of the brain were grinded in a cold glass mortar and homogenized (1 g of tissue/9 ml) in 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Activity of SOD was determined using NWLSS SOD assay kit (Product NWK-SOD02, Specificity: Cu/Zn, Mn and Fe Superoxide Dismutase, Sensitivity: 5 U/mL). The auto oxidation reaction was started by addition of freshly prepared pyrogallol solution to Tris– Hcl buffer at pH 8.5. The 50 % inhibition of hematoxylin by SOD was measured by spectrophotometer at 420 nm (Martin et al. 1987).
Catalase activity
Catalase activity in brain homogenate was determined according to method of Beers and Sizer (1952), which is based on the principle of catalase consumption of H2O2 substrate at 240 nm. CAT activity was assessed using NWLSS™ CAT activity assay kit (Product NWK-CAT01, Specificity: Catalase, Sensitivity: 6.0 U Catalase/mL).
Glutathione peroxidase activity
GPx activity was assessed using NWLSS™ cGPx (GPx1) ELISA assay kit (Product NWK-GPX02, Specificity: Glutathione peroxidase, Sensitivity: 12.5 pg/ml). The NWLSS™ cGPx assay is based on a sandwich Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent assay (ELISA), where sample GPx concentration is determined by comparing the 450 nm absorbance of sample wells to the absorbance of known standards (Tekebe 2002).
Statistical analysis
Data obtained were expressed as Mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 22 and all analysis was done using one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons. Values of P < 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Neurobehavioral assessment
Table 1 represents the results observed in the elevated plus maze test. A significant decrease (P < 0.05) in open arm duration was observed [F (4, 18) = 3.514, P = 0.027)] in EMR (14.00 ± 5.03), EMR + V (13.50 ± 8.17), EMR + R (2.80 ± 2.56) and EMR + V + R (8.80 ± 4.07) exposed groups when compared to the control (43.50 ± 11.39).
Index of open arm avoidance
Figure 1 shows the Index of open arm avoidance. The control group shows lower value (27.88 ± 3.171 when compared to EMR (39.66 ± 2.789), EMR + V (42.00 ± 4.900), EMR + R (43.02 ± 4.531), and EMR + V + R (41.74 ± 3.540) respectively. Although there was no significant statistical difference observed.
Assessment of lipid peroxidation
The concentration of MDA in the various treatment groups and the control was presented in Fig. 2. There was no any significant statistical difference observed in MDA concentration in the various treatment groups when compared to the control group.
Assessment of superoxide dismutase activity
The activity of Superoxide Dismutase enzyme (SOD) in the treatment and the control groups was presented in Fig. 3. There was no any significant statistical difference observed in SOD activities in the various treatment groups when compared to the control group.
Assessment of catalase activity
The activity of Catalase (CAT) in the treatment and the control group was presented in Fig. 4. A significant decrease (P < 0.05) in the activities of CAT was observed [F (4, 18) = 4.373, P = 0.012)] in EMR + R (52.60 ± 4.366 IU/L) and EMR + V + R (59.00 ± 2.944 IU/L) treatment groups when compared to the control (62.25 ± 3.301 IU/L).
Assessment of glutathione peroxidase activity
The activity of Glutathione Peroxidase (GPx) in the treatment and the control group was presented in Fig. 5. There was no significant statistical difference observed in the GPx activities in the various treatment groups when compared to the control group.
Discussion
This present study evaluated the combined effects of exposure to mobile phone electromagnetic field radiation, ringtone and vibration on anxiety-like behaviour and oxidative stress biomarkers in young albino wistar rats. Exploratory behaviours include open arm activity and head dipping a greater number of which indicate a greater level of exploration (Brown et al. 1999). In this study, a significant decreased in exploratory activities as measured by decreased time spent in open arm was observed in all the treatment groups when compared to the control. This corroborate with previous studies by some investigators who reported decreased exploratory activity and increase anxiety in EMR, vibration and noise exposed animals (Abbate et al. 2004; Khirazova et al. 2012). The statistical significance also seen between groups and the control confirmed the combined effects of EMR and other stressors (Raju et al. 2009), vibration and other stressors (Dormolen and Hertog 1994) as well as noise and other stressors (Smith et al. 1993). A decrease in percentage open arm entries, head dipping frequency, rearing and, defecation was also observed although not statistically significant. The index of open arm avoidance which is a measure of anxiety (Trullas and Skolnick 1993) was also not statistically significant even though there was a general decrease in all the treatment groups when compared to the control.
The observed effects of EMR on anxiety-like behavioral parameters can be stipulated by changes in activity of dopaminergic, glutamatergic and GABAnergic brain structures described previously in rats exposed to GSM-range EMR (Mausset-Bonnefont 2004). The dysfunction of GABA signaling system has long been associated with behaviour and anxiety like related disorders. Both Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) and glutamate are involved in regulation of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis (Di et al. 2009). While the GABAergic neurons in the hypothalamus can directly inhibit HPA axis via the hypothalamus and ultimately reduce cortisol secretion, glutamate activates the HPA axis by way of hypothalamus (Herman et al. 2004), hence increasing cortisol secretion as observed in our studies probably due to hyper-activation of HPA axis induced by electromagnetic radiation, vibration and ringtone.
The differences in the brain level of malondialdehyde (MDA) observed in the present study were not statistically significant in all the treatment groups when compared to the control even though slight decrease was observed in all the treatment groups when compared to the control. Similar results were obtained by Dasdag et al. (2003) and Aydogan et al. (2015) on the effects of EMR exposure to rats’ testes and parotid gland respectively. However, other studies revealed increased in MDA concentration in the brain and other tissues on exposure to EMR and vibration produced by larger machines and cellular phone (Meral et al. 2007; Polat et al. 2013). The results obtained for the antioxidant enzymes in this study indicates no significant statistical difference in the level of superoxidase dismutase (SOD) and Glutathione peroxidase in all the treatment groups when compared to the control. This is in agreement with findings of Hirose et al. (2006) and that of Aydogan et al. (2015) who reported no significant changes in SOD, GPx and Catalase when compared to the control.
The involvement of oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of anxiety has attracted much attention over the years a causal link between the antioxidant status of the brain and anxiety-related behaviour has been hypothesized by group of investigators implicating two antioxidant enzymes; glyoxalase 1 and glutathione reductase 1 as key regulators of anxiety in mice and neuronal cell culture model of oxidative stress (Hovatta et al. 2005; Salim 2011). Others demonstrated that oxidative stress-related anxiety can be reversed in mice upon inhibition of NADPH oxidase or phosphodiesterase- 2, enzyme that is indirectly implicated in oxidative stress mechanisms (Masood et al. 2008). Results from our findings showed a significant decrease in Catalase activity in group IV (EMR + R) and V (EMR + R + V) when compared to the control. This conflicts the findings of Yurekli et al. (2006) and that of Khirazova et al. (2012) who reported increased in SOD, GPx and Catalase activity in EMR exposed animals when compared to control. Numerous investigators have reported contradictory findings on the effect of radiofrequency radiation on antioxidant enzymes and biomarkers of oxidative stress in different tissues which may be attributed to different biochemical, anatomical and physiological properties of the tissues (Devrim et al. 2008; Guney et al. 2007; Imge et al. 2010; Meral et al. 2007). While some animal studies have shown that oxidative stress develops in response to cell phone radiation by increasing production of reactive oxygen species or decreasing antioxidant enzyme activity to scavenge the free radicals produced which is similar to our findings (Oktem et al. 2005; Oral et al. 2006; Balci et al. 2007; Narayanan et al. 2014), others reported the up-regulation of the cells natural antioxidant enzymes (Yurekli et al. 2006; Khirazova et al. 2012).
The absence of significant effects on MDA, SOD and GPx seen in the present study may be compensatory in nature and postulated by mobilization of other endogenous antioxidants such as nitric oxide (NO), by other antioxidant defense system in response to lesser lipid peroxidation and generation of reactive oxygen species during the exposure. The affinity of NO for O2 − was observed to be far greater than the affinity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) for O2 −, hence, NO may compete with SOD for O2 −, thereby removing O2 − and sparing SOD and other endogenous or primary antioxidant enzymes for other scavenging duties (Das and Maulik 2006). This could also be a possible reason why exposure to EMR fails to up-regulate the activities of the indigenous antioxidant enzymes as observed in this study.
Another possible cause of the behavioral changes could be attributed to the increased activity of the HPA axis in exposed animals. Both physical and psychological stress experiences activate the HPA axis through the secretion of corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) (de Kloet et al. 2005). These neuropeptides activate the synthesis and the release of adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) from the anterior pituitary, which successively stimulates the adrenal cortex to synthesize cortisol and corticosterone in humans and rats respectively (Faravelli et al. 2012). These hormones influence several physiological processes and the synthesis of neurotrophic factors, with effects on mood and anxiety-like behaviours (Sapolsky et al. 2000; de Kloet 2003). However, whole-body vibration occurs when the body is supported by a vibrating surface (Griffin 1990). The vibration exposed groups in this experiment reflect a whole body vibration. Vibration produce by mobile phones on human is segmental rather than whole. Therefore, the result here cannot be translated into the effect of mobile phone vibration on human. However, it may slightly reflect the vibration caused by vehicles on man.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the result of the present study indicates that four weeks exposure to electromagnetic radiation or in combination with either vibration, ringtone or both produced significant effect on anxiety-like behaviours probably due to oxidative stress that could lead to the activation of HPA axis in young wistar rats. More studies are warranted to unveil the mechanistic pathways via which EMR, vibration and noise exert their biological effects especially in the brain.
References
Abbate C, Micali E, Giorgianni C, Munao F, Brecciaroli R, Salmaso L, Germano D (2004) Affective correlates of occupational exposure to whole-body vibration-A case-control study. Psychother Psychosom 73:375–379
Agarwal A, Desai NR, Makker K, Varghese A, Mouradi R, Sabanegh E, Sharma R (2009) Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: an in vitro pilot study. Fertil Steril 92(4):1318–1325
Ahlbom A, Green A, Kheifets L (2004) Epidemiology of health effects of radiofrequency exposure. Environ Health Perspect 112:1741–1754
Aydogan F, Unlu I, Aydin E, Yumusak N, Devrim E, Samim EE, Ozgur E, et al. (2015) The effect of 2100 MHz radiofrequency radiation of a 3G mobile phone on the parotid gland of rats. Am J Otolaryngol Head Neck Med Surg 36:39–46
Balci M, Devrim E, Durak I (2007) Effects of mobile phones on oxidant/antioxidant balance in cornea and lens of rats. Curr Eye Res 32(1):21–25
Beers Jr RF, Sizer IW (1952) A Spectrophotomeric Method for Meassuring the Breakdown of Hydrogen Peroxide by Catalase. J Biol Chem 195:133–140
Berglund B, Hassmén P (1996) Sources and effects of low-frequency noise. J Acoust 26(3):307–314
Brookes T (2012) A Brief History of mobile Phones. Available at: http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/history-mobile-phones/ Retrieved on Dec 11,
Brown RE, Corey SC, Moore AK (1999) Differences in measures of exploration and fear in MHC-congenic C57BL/6 J and B6-H2K mice. Behav Genet 26:263–271
Clark C, Sörqvist P (2012) A 3 year update on the influence of noise on performance and behavior. Noise Health 14(61):292–296
Das DK, Maulik N (2006) Resveratrol in Cadioprotection: A therapeutic Potential in Alternative Medicine. Mol Interv 6(1):36–47
Dasdag S, Zulkuf AM, Aksen F, Yilmaz F, Bashan M, Mutlu DM, Salih CM (2003) Whole body exposure of rats to microwaves emitted from a cell phone does not affect the testes. Bioelectromagnetics 24(3):182–188
De Iuliis GN, Newey RJ, King BV, Aitken RJ (2009) Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. PLoS One 4(7):6446
de Kloet ER (2003) Hormones, brain and stress. Endocr Regul 37:51–68
de Kloet ER, Joels M, Holsboer F (2005) Stress and the brain: from adaptation to disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:463–475
Devrim E, Ergüder IB, Kılıçoğlu B, et al. (2008) Effects of electromagnetic radiation use on oxidant/antioxidant status and DNA turn-over enzyme activities in erythrocytes and heart, kidney, liver, and ovary tissues from rats: Possible protective role of vitamin C. Toxicol Mech Methods 18:679–683
Di S, Maxson MM, Franco A, Tasker JG (2009) Glucocorticoids regulate glutamate and GABA synapse-specific retrograde transmission via divergent nongenomic signaling pathways. J Neurosci 29:393–401
Dormolen VM, Hertog C (1994) Combined workload, methodological considerations on recent research. In: Manninen O (ed) Recent Advances in Researches on the Combined Effects of Environmental Factors. Tampere, Finland, Pk-Paino, pp. 25–39
Eyad I (2012) Charts of GSM/3GSM coverage and frequency usage for the world, Europe, Asia and the Americas. Available at: www.coveragemaps.com Retrieved on 2/12/2012.
Faravelli C, Lo Sauro C, Godini L, Lelli L, Benni L, Pietrini F, Lazzeretti L, et al. (2012) Childhood stressful events, HPA axis and anxiety disorders. World J Psychiatr 2(1):13–25
Griffin MJ (1990) Handbook of Human Vibration. London: San Diego. Academic Press, p. 1008
Guney M, Ozguner F, Oral B, Karahan N, Mungan T (2007) 900 MHz radiofrequency-induced histopathologic changes and oxidative stress in rat endometrium: protection by vitamins E and C. Toxicol Ind Health 23(7):411–420
Herman JP, Mueller NK, Figueiredo H (2004) Role of GABA and glutamate circuitry in hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical stress integration. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1018:35–45
Hirose H, Sakuma N, Kaji N, Suhara T, Sekijima M, Nojima T, Miyakohi J (2006) Phosphorylation and gene expression of p53 are not affected in human cells exposed to 2.1425 GHz band CW or W=CDMA modulated radiation allocated to radio base stations. Bioelectomagnetics 27:494–504
Hovatta I, Tennant RS, Helton R, Marr RA, Singer O, Redwine JM, Ellison JA, et al. (2005) Glyoxalase 1 and glutathione reductase 1 regulate anxiety in mice. Nature 438:662–666
Hung CS, Anderson C, Horne JA, McEvoy P (2007) Mobile phone 'talk-mode' signal delays EEG-determined sleep onset. Neurosci Lett 421(1):82–86
ICNRP (1998) Guidelines For Limiting Exposure To Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic, And Electromagnetic Fields (up to 300 GHz). Int Comm Non-Ionizing Radiat Prot Health Phys 74(4):494–505
Imge EB, Kiliçoğlu B, Devrim E, et al. (2010) Effects of mobile phone use on brain tissue from the rat and a possible protective role of vitamin C – a preliminary study. Int J Radiat Biol 86:1044–1049
Janero DR (1990) Malondialdehyde and thiobarbituric acid-reactivity as diagnostic indices of lipid peroxidation and peroxidative tissue injury. Free Radic Biol Med 9:515–540
Janet P (2011) Triple GSM SIM Phone comes from Japan via AKAI". MobileSmug Available at: http://mobilesmug.com/news/1-phones/732-triple-gsm-sim-phone-comes-from-japan-via-akai. Retrieved 19 January 2012
Khirazova EE, Baizhumanov AA, Trofimova LK, Maslova DMV, Sokolova NA, Kudryashova NY (2012) Effects of GSM-Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation on some Physiological and Biochemical Parameters in Rats. Bull of Exp Biol and Med 153(6)
Lister RG (1987) The use of a plus-maze to measure anxiety in the mouse. Psychopharmacology 92:180–185
Liebel F, Kaur S, Ruvolo E, Kollias N, Southall MD (2012) Irradiation of skin with visible light induces reactive oxygen species and matrix-degrading enzymes. J Invest Dermatol 132(7):1901–1907
Makoto A, Akira O (1983) Effect of whole body vibration on the rat brain content of serotonin and plasma corticosterone. Eur J Appl Physiol 52:15–19
Marco C (2002) The effects of vibration on human performance and hormonal profile. Empirical and Theoretical issues in Sport Sciences Budapest Pp 23-32
Martin JP, Dailey M, Sugar E (1987) Negative and Positive Assays of Superoxide Dismutase Based on Hematoxylin Autoxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys 255:329–336
Masood A, Nadeem A, Mustafa SJ, O’Donnell JM (2008) Reversal of oxidative stress-induced anxiety by inhibition of phosphodiesterase-2 in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 326:369–379
Mausset-Bonnefont AL, Hirbec H, Bonnefont X, Privat A, Vignon J, de Seze R (2004) Acute exposure to GSM 900-MHz electromagnetic fields induces glial reactivity and biochemical modifications in the rat brain. Neurobiolical Discussion 17(3):445–54
Meral I, Mert H, Mert N, Deger Y, Yoruk I, Yektin A, Keskin S (2007) Effects of 900-MHz electromagnetic field emitted from cellular phone on brain oxidative stress and some vitamin levels of guinea pigs. Brain Res 1169:120–124
Narayanan SN, Kumar RS, Kedage V, Nalini K, Nayak S, Bhat PG (2014) Evaluation of oxidant stress and antioxidant defense in discrete brain regions of rats exposed to 900 MHz radiation. Bratisl Lek Listy 115(5):260–266
NCC (2012) National Communication Council. http://www.ncc.gov.ng/industry-statistics/subscriber-data.html. Retrieved on 13/12/2012
Nittby H, Grafström G, Tian DP, Malmgren L, Brun A, Persson BR, Salford LG, Eberhardt J (2008) Cognitive impairment in rats after long-term exposure to GSM-900 mobile phone radiation. Bioelectromagnetics 29(3):219–232
Okhawa H, Ohishi N, Yagi K (1979) Assay of lipid peroxides in animals’ tissue by thiobarbituraic acid reaction. Anal Biochem 95:351–358
Oktem F, Ozguner F, Mollaoglu H, Koyu A, Uz E (2005) Oxidative damage in the kidney induced by 900-MHz-emitted mobile phone: protection by melatonin. Arch Med Res 36(4):350–355
Oral B, Guney M, Ozguner F, Karahan N, Mungan T, Comlekci S, Cesur G (2006) Endometrial apoptosis induced by a 900-MHz mobile phone: preventive effects of vitamins E and C. Adv Ther 23(6):957–973
Polat N, Kilinc A, Yalcin AS (2013) Oxidative stress parameters in blood and urine of metal-shelf factory workers. Mar Med J 26:25–29
Raju SK, Sareesh NN, Satheesha N, Maneesh M (2009) Hypoactivity Of Wistar Rats Exposed To Mobile Phone On Elevated Plus Maze. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 53(3):283–286
Salama N, Kishimoto T, Kanayama HO (2009) The mobile phone decreases fructose but not citrate in rabbit semen: a longitudinal study. Syst Biol Reprod Me 55(5–6):181–187
Salim S (2011) Oxidative Stress in Anxiety: Implications for Pharmacotherapy. Am J of Integr Med 1(1):11–21
Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU (2000) How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr Rev 21:55–89
Sareesh NN, Raju SK, Bhagath KP, Satheesha N, Maneesh M (2009) Spatial Memory Perfomance of Wistar Rats Exposed to Mobile Phone. Clinics 64(3):231–234
Smith A, Thomas M, Brockman P (1993) Noise respiratory virus infections and performance. In: Vallet M (ed) Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, vol 2. Nice, France, INRETS, pp. 311–314
Talbott E, Thompson SJ (1995) Health effects from environmental noise exposure. In: Introduction to Environmental Epidemiology. Lewis Publishers, New York, pp. 209–219
Tekebe G (2002) A comparative study on the hydroperoxide and thiol specificity of the glutathione peroxidase family and selenoprotein P. J Biol Chem 277(43):41254–41258
Trullas R, Skolnick P (1993) Differences in fear motivated behaviors among inbred mouse strains. Psychopharmacology 111:323–331
van Kempen EE, van Kamp I, Stellato RK, Lopez-Barrio I, Haines MM, Nilsson ME, Clark C, Houthuijs D, Brunekreef B, Berglund B, Stansfeld SA (2009) Children's annoyance reactions to aircraft and road traffic noise. J Acoust Soc Am 125(2):895–904
Yurekli AI, Ozkan M, Kalkan T, Saybasili H, Atukeren P, Pinar K, Gumustas K, Seker S (2006) GSM base station electromagnetic radiation and oxidative stress in rats. Electomag Biol Med 25:177
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Malam Isa Ahmed-Sherif of the Department of Human Physiology, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria, for his assistance in training and handling of the animals, Mr. Olu Aiyegbuisi of the Department of Chemical Pathology, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital Zaria, Nigeria for biochemical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All experimental protocols were in accordance with the Ahmadu Bello University Research policy; and ethic and regulations governing the care and use of experimental animals (NIH Publication no. 85–23, revised 1996).
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shehu, A., Mohammed, A., Magaji, R.A. et al. Exposure to mobile phone electromagnetic field radiation, ringtone and vibration affects anxiety-like behaviour and oxidative stress biomarkers in albino wistar rats. Metab Brain Dis 31, 355–362 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-015-9758-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-015-9758-x