Introduction

Maple syrup urine disease (MSUD) is an inherited disorder caused by mutation in any of the 4 subunits (E1α, E1β, E2, E3) of the branched chain α-keto acid dehydrogenase (BCKAD) enzyme complex. Due to BCKAD deficiency high concentrations of the branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) leucine (Leu), valine and isoleucine as well as the respective branched chain α-keto acids (BCKA) α-ketoisocaproic (KIC), α-keto-β-methylvaleric and α-keto acids α-ketoisovaleric acids accumulate in patients on an unrestricted diet and during episodes of metabolic decompensation crisis (Chuang and Shih 2001; Chuang 1998). The worldwide frequency is approximately 1 in 180,000 newborns and patients can be divided into five phenotypes ranging from the classical form with a neonatal onset to milder variants with later onset (Chuang and Shih 2001).

The clinical features of classic MSUD include poor feeding, convulsions, failure to thrive, ketoacidosis, apnea, hypoglycemia, coma, ataxia, seizures, psychomotor delay and mental retardation. In addition, severe generalized brain edema, cerebral atrophy and hypomyelination are usually seen in MSUD patients, the mechanisms underlying brain damage is poorly known and needs to be exploited further explored (Chuang and Shih 2001; Schönberger et al. 2004). Literature has shown that Leu and its transamination product (KIC) are considered the main toxic metabolites to the central nervous system once their increased concentrations have been associated to the appearance of neurological symptoms (Chuang and Shih 2001; Hoffmann et al. 2006). Also, it has been demonstrated that the metabolites accumulated in MSUD can decrease neurotransmitter metabolism (Zielke et al. 1997; Tavares et al. 2000), leads to neuronal apoptosis (Jouvet et al. 2000), alter energy metabolism in rat brain (Sgaravatti et al. 2003; Ribeiro et al. 2008; Amaral et al. 2010), reduce the uptake of essential amino acids by brain tissue (Araújo et al. 2001) and can reduce the ability to also modulate the damage associated to increased free radical production (Bridi et al. 2003, 2005a; b; Fontella et al. 2002).

Therapy for MSUD comprises a lifelong strict and carefully adjusted semi-synthetic diet with widely restricted amounts of protein, with low BCAA supplemented with a formula of essential amino acids, vitamins and minerals (Frazier et al. 2014). The goal of treatment is to protect the brain from functional disturbances and structural damage by keeping the plasma branched-chain metabolites continually close to normal range (Strauss et al. 2010). However, it has been already verified that MSUD patients under treatment present a marked deficiency in antioxidants compounds and this may possibly be secondary to the protein restricted diet that implies in smaller amounts of these micronutrients (Barschak et al. 2007; Sitta et al. 2014). In this context, recently it was demonstrated that treated MSUD patients have L-carnitine deficiency, which can be obtained mainly from dietary protein supply (Mescka et al. 2013).

L-carnitine (L-car) or 3-hydroxy-4-methylammoniobutanoate regulates the flux substrate and energy balance across cell membranes by modulating both the transport of long-chain fatty acids into mitochondria and the subsequent β-oxidation. Foods of animal origin contain substantial amounts of L-car, but this compound is produced endogenously also in lesser amount using the amino acids lysine and methionine (Foster 2004). It has been demonstrated that L-car shows antioxidant capacity by reducing lipid peroxidation with a degree comparable to that observed with α-tocopherol and also an antioxidant protective role by scavenging reactive oxygen species as superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide and by inhibiting hydroxyl radical formation in the Fenton reaction system (Gulcin 2006; Reznick et al. 1992). There has been an increased number of studies reporting interesting effects of L-car on cells of the immune system (Izgüt-Uysal et al. 2003; Pertosa et al. 2005; Szefel et al. 2012) and there are no data in the literature reporting the inflammatory profile of MSUD patients, much less the L-car role on the inflammatory response in this disorder. Hence, the present study was designed to investigate the effects of L-car supplementation on plasma inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interferon-gamma (IFN -ɣ), and malondialdehyde (MDA), as a marker of oxidative stress, in treated MSUD patients, as well as to establish a possible relation between this parameters.

Materials and methods

Patients and controls

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil (project n° 140191). Informed consent was obtained according to the guidelines of our committee. Classical MSUD patients were recruited from the Medical Genetic Service of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil. Plasma samples were obtained from seven MSUD patients under protein restricted diet protocol (mean age 8.28 ± 2.87 years) and six healthy individuals (control group) with comparable age and sex (mean age 6.0 ± 3.12 years). The main features of patients with MSUD at diagnosis were convulsions, ketoacidosis, poor feeding, hypoglycemia and psychomotor delay. Dietary treatment (median 0,95 year – range 15 days to 9,83 years) consisted of a protein-restricted diet supplemented with a semi-synthetic formula of essential amino acids, vitamins and minerals and not containing L-car (MSUD 1 or MSUD 2 Milupa1). Furthermore, for this study, MSUD patients were supplemented with L-car capsules, at a dose of 50 mg/kg/day, not exceeding 1.5 g/day for 2 months. Inflammatory cytokines, MDA and free L-car levels were analyzed in blood of MSUD patients before (No L-car) and after one (L-car 1) and 2 months (L-car 2) of L-car supplementation.

Biological sample collection and preparation

Blood samples from patients and controls were processed and stored by the same procedure. Blood samples from six age- and gender-matched controls (mean age 6.0 ± 3.12 years) were recruited anonymously from the laboratory of Faculdade de Farmácia da UFRGS, RS, Brazil. After venous puncture and collection in heparinized vials, plasma and cells were separated by centrifugation at 3,000 g for 10 min at 4 °C. Plasma was removed by aspiration and stored at −80 °C until further analysis.

Inflammatory cytokines measurement: IL-1β, IL-6, IFN -ɣ

Plasma IL-1β, IL-6 and IFN-ɣ were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (Mabtech AB, Sweden). The assay utilizes ELISA strip plates pre-coated with a capture monoclonal antibody (mAb), to which samples are added. Captured cytokine is detected by adding a biotinylated mAb followed by streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase. Addition of the enzyme substrate TMB results in a colored substrate product. Intensity of the color is directly proportional to the concentration of cytokine in the sample, which is determined by comparison with a serial dilution of recombinant cytokine standard analyzed in parallel. The results were expressed as pg/mL.

MDA content

MDA was measured by following method described by Karatepe (2004). Briefly, 100 μL of plasma was mixed with 100 μL of 0.1 M perchloric acid and 1 mL of distilled water. The samples then were centrifugated at 1,500 g for 5 min and used for HPLC analysis. The column used was Supelcosil C18 (5 μm) 15 cm × 4.6 mm, the mobile phase was 82.5:17.5 (v/v) 30 mM monobasic potassium phosphate (pH 3.6)-methanol and the flow rate was 1.2 mL/min. The detection was monitored at 250 nm. The system was calibrated with a standard solution of MDA, which was used for quantification. Results were expressed in μmol/L of MDA.

Free L-car determination

Free L-car levels were determined in blood spots by liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS), using the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode (Chace et al. 1997). Results were reported in μmol/L.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Comparison between means was analyzed for repeated measures of ANOVA followed by the Tukey multiple range test when the F value was significant. Correlations were carried out using the Pearson correlation coefficient. A p value lower than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

In this study we evaluated the L-car supplementation effect on the inflammatory response in plasma from MSUD patients treated with a protein-restricted diet. The MSUD patients were divided into three groups: before supplementation with L-car (Group No L-car), after 1 month of L-car supplementation (L-car 1) and after 2 months of treatment with this compound (L-car 2). The MSUD patients under treatment (Group No L-car) have L-car deficiency compared to control group. After 1 month of L-car supplementation (L-car 1), the concentrations of this micronutrient have reached levels comparable to the control group (Control Group: 43.85 ± 8.89 μmol/L; Group No L-car: 24.28 ± 10.83 μmol/L; Group L-car 1: 49.01 ± 8.60 μmol/L; L-car 2: 53.18 ± 10.79 μmol/L) [F (3,22) = 6.253, p < 0.05]. The lipid peroxidation levels (measured as plasma malondialdehyde) were significantly elevated compared to controls and a reversal of lipid peroxidation to control levels occurred in 2 months of L-car therapy (Group L-car 2) (Control Group: 0.027 ± 0.003 μmol/L; Group No L-car: 0.087 ± 0.006 μmol/L; Group L-car 1: 0.038 ± 0.003 μmol/L; L-car 2: 0.035 ± 0.003 μmol/L) [F (3.29) = 19.541, p < 0.05] (Mescka et al. 2013).

Thereafter, we examined the L-car supplementation influence on the inflammatory profile in MSUD patients. It was found that MSUD patients (Group No L-car) have significantly increased pro-inflammatory cytokines levels compared to the control group. L-car supplementation (Group L-car 1 and Group L-car 2) induced a reversion of IL-1β [F (3,22) = 6.032, p < 0.05] and IFN-ɣ [F (3,24) = 10.84, p < 0.05] concentrations to control levels (Fig. 1a and b, respectively) and a reduction of IL-6 close to control levels [F (3,24) = 37.69, p < 0.05] (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1
figure 1

a interleukin-1β (IL-1β), b interleukin-6 (IL-6), c interferon-gamma (IFN-ɣ) measurements in plasma of MSUD patients and controls. Group No L-car: patients before supplementation with L-car. Group L-car 1: patients after 1 month of L-car supplementation. Group L-car 2: patients after 2 months of L-car supplementation. Data represent the mean ± SD. Number of MSUD patients = 5–7. Number of controls = 6. * p < 0.05 compared to controls, # p < 0.05 compared to Group No L-car, # P < 0.05 compared to Group L-car 1 (Tukey multiple range test)

As it can be seen in Fig. 2, strongly significant inverse correlations between free L-car levels and IL-1β (r = −0.7505; p < 0.05, Fig. 2a), IL-6 (r = −0.8235; p < 0.05, Fig. 2b), and IFN-ɣ (r = −0.6279; p < 0.05, Fig. 2c) concentrations were observed, indicating a possible L-car anti-inflammatory role in the plasma of patients MSUD.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Correlation between a interleukin-1β (IL-1β), b interleukin-6 (IL-6), c interferon-gamma (IFN-ɣ) \ measurement vs. free L-carnitine (L-car) levels in plasma of MSUD patients (Number of MSUD patients samples = 14–18). Graphs show the Pearson correlation coefficient and probabilities

Lastly, we found significant positive correlations between MDA values and IL-1β (r = 0.6645; p < 0.05, Fig. 3a), IL-6 (r = 0.5197; p < 0.05, Fig. 3b) and IFN-ɣ did not show significant correlation with MDA concentrations (r = 0.1616; p > 0.05, Fig. 3c).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Correlation between a interleukin-1β (IL-1β), b interleukin-6 (IL-6) and c interferon-gamma (IFN-ɣ) measurement vs. malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in plasma of MSUD patients (Number of MSUD patients samples = 14–18). Graphs show the Pearson correlation coefficient and probabilities

Discussion

Inflammation occurs in response to any alteration of tissue integrity, in order to restore tissue homeostasis through the induction of various repair mechanisms (Muriach et al. 2014). During this dysregulation of physiological functions, occurs a local and finally a systemic inflammation that is characterized by production of high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and can leads to oxidative stress and damage of biomolecules, such as proteins, lipids and DNA (Brüne et al. 2013).

There are few studies that correlate inflammatory processes with MSUD. It has been shown that BCAAs are able to influence the immunological properties of microglia cell culture by changing the responsiveness to pro-inflammatory signals (De Simone et al. 2013). Furthermore, Scaini et al. (2014) suggest that this inflammatory process associated with high levels of BCAA may contribute to a blood brain barrier breakdown in patients MSUD and its can be related to the neurological dysfunction observed in this disorder. Clinically is well described that inflammatory process, such as infection, may often precipitate acute metabolic decompensation with complications in MSUD patients (Chuang and Shih 2001), but in the best of our knowledge there are no studies in the literature reporting the inflammatory profile of MSUD patients, much less the possible L-car role on the inflammatory response in this disorder.

Therefore, in our study, it was observed that MSUD patients in treatment with restricted protein diet and without L-car supplementation have high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6 and IFN-ɣ in relation to the control group. After the beginning of L-car treatment, there was a significant decrease in the levels of these cytokines to concentrations similar to the control group, demonstrating that L-car was able to reverse the inflammatory process modulated by these cytokines. These pro-inflammatory cytokines are increased during immune activation and inflammation and can induce the production of oxidants, prostaglandins, and mitochondrial ROS by macrophages, thus contributing to inflammatory responses (Muralidharan and Mandrekar 2013). Macrophages and monocytes are the major source of IL-1β, molecule able to induce inflammatory and proapoptotic responses mediated by factors such as prostaglandins, ROS, inducible NO synthase, and NO. IL-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine that affects immune responses and antigen-specific inflammatory reactions being a major mediator of the acute phase inflammation and can be produced by several cell types, including T and B cells, monocytes, macrophages, fibroblasts and endothelial cells. The cytokine IFN-ɣ is mainly produced by T helper cell type 1 (Th1) lymphocytes, natural killer (NK) cells, B cells and NKT cells. During Th1-type response, IFN-ɣ is probably the most important trigger for high ROS production in macrophages by phagocytic NADPH oxidase (NOX).

There was also an inverse significant correlation between the inflammatory markers analyzed and the L-car concentrations, showing a possible anti-inflammatory effect of this compound, since L-car supplementation significantly decreased the inflammatory markers tested. Moreover, there was a positive significant correlation in plasma of MSUD patients between pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-6 and MDA values, the main marker of lipid peroxidation. These results evidence a possible direct relationship between inflammation and increased oxidative stress in MSUD patients.

Patients with inflammatory diseases usually exhibit antioxidants reduced levels, which might be due to insufficient nutritional intake or caused by an to increased antioxidant demand for oxidation due to continuous high levels ROS production by the activation of immune competent cells (Muñoz and Costa 2013; Mangge et al. 2014). Thus, the finding of an inverse correlation between L-car concentrations and inflammatory cytokines could be related to an insufficient dietetic supply of this compound and an increased requirement for antioxidant molecules during inflammatory episodes and this may contribute to decompensation metabolic crisis in MSUD patients.

L-car is considered nowadays one of the nutraceuticals that has pleiotropic crucial biologic effects. L-car deficiency may cause damage to cellular metabolism, which can be primary, as a result of defects in the specific transport of L-car into the cells, or secondary, as reported in some inborn errors of metabolism and acquired medical conditions such as organic aciduria, mitochondrial respiratory chain defects and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase deficiency (Famularo and De Simone 1995; Shakeri et al. 2010; Ribas et al. 2014). Various pathological disorders including epilepsy, cirrhosis, malabsorption have been also associated with secondary L-car deficiency and oral dosage forms are nowadays approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for primary and secondary systemic L-car deficiency. Some unlabeled uses of this compound are for the treatment or prophylaxis of valproate toxicity, Alzheimer’s disease, muscle disorders, cardiovascular diseases, HIV infection, and male infertility (Hatamkhani et al. 2013).

The most important recognized functions of the L-car are transport of long-chain fatty acid across the inner mitochondrial membrane, where β-oxidation occurs, and the removal from the mitochondria of potentially toxic end-products of fatty acid metabolism. However, a series of studies have been performed to determine L-car effect on cells of the immune system. Several data indicate that L-car deficiency is a contributing factor to the progression of infection in patients with human immunodeficiency virus, and that L-car therapy in those patients could counteract the unregulated process of lymphocyte apoptosis and improve CD4 counts (Famularo et al. 2004). Izgüt-Uysal and colleagues (2003) demonstrate that L-car is capable to restore the age-related changes in the inflammatory cells functions and play a protective role in the tissue destruction in inflammation by decreasing the superoxide anion production. Other studies have shown that L-car has a therapeutic effect on morbidity and lipid metabolism in cachexia and septic shock rat models, and that these effects could be the result of down-regulation of cytokine production and/or increased clearance of cytokines (Winter et al. 1995). Regular L-car supplementation in hemodialysis patients demonstrated to increase cellular defense against chronic inflammation and oxidative stress, most likely by modulating the specific signal transduction cascade activated by an overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines and free radicals action (Pertosa et al. 2005).

Although the L-car actions in the brain are not yet fully established, in the last years studies in animals and cells have demonstrated numerous neuroprotective, neuromodulatory and neurotrophic properties of this compound (Ribas et al. 2014). However, there are no data in the literature showing an improvement in the clinical condition of MSUD patients supplemented with L-car, but there are few and recent reports of clinical improvement in other disorders. For instance, Cuturic et al. (2013) observed in Huntington’s disease, that the patients with low serum L-car levels who received low-dose of levocarnitine supplementation, during a mean period of 7.3 months, showed improvement in motor, cognitive and behavioral measures. They speculated that the observed clinical improvement is related with the resolution of reversible metabolic encephalopathy and myopathy associated with secondary carnitine deficiency. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, it was verified an improvement of cognitive deficits, the reduction of ammonia, and the modification of electroencephalogram analysis in treated L-car patients with severe hepatic encephalopathy (Malaguarnera et al. 2011a). The same research group also showed that acetyl-l-carnitine reduces depression and improves life quality in patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy (Malaguarnera et al. 2011b).

L-car supplementation has been usually considered safe and with low risk of adverse effects, which makes it a promising candidate for the prevention and treatment of oxidative alterations in many diseases. Is important to emphasize that supplementation with L-car in MSUD patients of our study, who were deficient in L-car, was held for a period of 2 months, and perhaps the clinical improvement effects of the administration would be better evaluated in a long-term treatment. Moreover, it was verified a higher excretion of KIC, the major neurotoxic acid accumulated in this disorder, in the urine of MSUD patients treated with L-car, what reinforces the importance of this compound in the elimination of the toxic metabolites in these patients (Guerreiro et al. 2015). These findings may represent a new perspective for the use of L-car as a possible antioxidant adjunct treatment. For this purpose, we intended to do in a future a translational and clinical study to fully explore this potential.

Evidence accumulated over the past decades has pointed to significant connections between inflammation and oxidative stress, both processes contributing to fuel the other one, thereby establishing a vicious cycle able to perpetuate and propagate the inflammatory response (Lugrin et al. 2014). Taken together, these data highlight that the maintenance of normal L-car concentrations in MSUD patients could have an important role in inflammatory process. The L-car system seems to be a relevant endogenous physiologic mediator to protect against damage during the inflammatory response and the unregulated production of ROS can act as a major factor in triggering cell injury. This study showed a possible beneficial influence of L-car supplementation on immune system functions in MSUD patients. Furthermore, we suggest that L-car could be useful in MSUD therapy representing a new approach to the current treatment, which consists of protein restrict diet. Future studies will examine the mechanism of the reduction of cytokine levels by L-car determining whether L-car lowers its levels by increasing clearance, or by reducing production of cytokines in MSUD.