Abstract
The optical properties of a precursor dry Ferritin powder and its iron oxide derivatives were studied using UV–visible spectroscopy. The iron oxide derivatives were synthesized by applying controlled heat treatment up to 700 °C. The optical properties show dramatic variation in absorption spectra through a large shift in absorption band edge as a function of annealing temperature. On one side (40 ℃) we have precursor Ferritin powder and on the other side (700 ℃) a crystalline hematite phase along with disordered phases at intermediate temperatures. Energy dispersive x-ray (EDX) analysis and XRD reveal that crystallization and thermal destruction of organic cage are inter-related. As ferrihydrite complexes inside the Ferritin cavity go through solidification from amorphous Fe2O3 to hematite crystalline phase (α-Fe2O3), the heterogeneity of electronic excitation processes occurs through ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT), pair excitation and ligand field (d-d) transition. Strong magnetic induction in the intermediate range (400–500 °C) was associated with the enhancement of the pair excitation process. As the material changes phases due to annealing, a large absorption band edge shift from 2.65 to 1.28 eV, a total red shift of 1.37 eV, provides a simple approach to tuneable optical properties of iron oxides.
Graphical abstract
Highlights
-
Ferritin, a biomacromolecule, was used to synthesize nanomaterials with variable optical properties in a sol–gel technique.
-
The variation originates from the structure of nanomaterials which include disordered and crystalline phase of Fe2O3 as a function of annealing temperature.
-
The presence of a large tunable range (1.37 eV) of band gap that covers the entire visible range from blue to red end of the spectrum.
-
EDX and XRD measurements show correlation between thermal destruction of the organic core and crystallization of hematite phase.
-
The pair-excitation transition becomes stronger than LMCT in mid temperature range (400–500 °C) as result of strong magnetic coupling.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Transition metal oxides (TMOs) are fascinating materials for their rich optical and magnetic properties [1,2,3]. The bulk phase of hematite (α-Fe2O3) shows very weak magnetic induction due to the anti-ferromagnetic coupling of two interpenetrating sub-lattices [4, 5]. In principle, the net magnetization would be zero due to the mutual cancellation of spins of two sub-lattices but the presence of spin canting results in non-zero net magnetization that is often very weak. However when crystalline particles are of few tens of nanometers or less, surface disorder results in strong magnetization since the exact cancellation of spins is offset by lattice disorder. In our recent study, we had shown that the small size nanocrystalline α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles show stronger magnetization as compared to larger particles [6]. The α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles find applications in photocatalysis, water splitting, hyperthermia treatment, ferrofluids, memory devices and spintronics [7,8,9,10,11]. The studies of TMOs in general and α-Fe2O3, in particular, had been carried out widely from a different perspective using chemical synthesis routes [1, 12, 13]. In recent times, biomimetic synthesis has become popular due to gaining control over particle size and shape [6, 14,15,16]. Ferritin is a biomacromolecule that houses around 2000 Fe ion complexes inside a soft shell of polypeptides. It gives a way for a template synthesis of mono-disperse nanoparticles [14]. Biomimetic synthesis achieved much success yet the idea is far from being fully exploited. In general, bio macromolecules find mention in materials science as biomaterials for advanced applications [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. We need to devise ways and strategies for better control of particle size and shape for obtaining predictable properties and applications. It requires a lot of ground work with a view of different aspects of synthesis and their physical properties. In this article, we discuss the optical properties of the various phases of Fe2O3 synthesized from Ferritin using sol–gel method [12, 24]. In a two-step process, a liquid colloidal suspension of Ferritin was dried on the solid surface at a slightly elevated temperature of 40 °C. In the next “firing” stage, the samples were heat treated at different temperatures from 100–700 °C with a gap of 100 °C for each successive sample. The temperature range was sufficient to destroy the organic shell and to promote calcinations and crystalline growth in the samples. The iron compound in the cavity goes through ferrihydrite to amorphous Fe2O3, and then finally it changes to hematite crystalline phase in the same temperature range of annealing [6]. The purpose of the present experimental work was to study optical properties as the system passes through different structural phases. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and x-ray diffraction (XRD) were used to analyze the nanoscale morphology and atomic structure of the specimen. Energy dispersive x-ray (EDX) was used for finding the relative concentration of elements. A vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) was used to study magnetic properties. UV–VIS spectroscopy was used to study optical absorption properties for analysis of spectral distribution and band structure. Grazing incidence XRD at synchrotron source (INDUS-II) was used to analyze crystal structure and distribution of orientations.
In a way, this study is unique. The set of samples comprises dried Ferritin shells loaded with ferrihydrite molecules on one side (40 °C) and crystalline α-Fe2O3 phase on another side (700 °C). At all other intermediate temperatures, several phases of material exist including amorphous and crystalline nanoparticles. Various studies of optical properties of Fe2O3 are reported in the published literature of experimental and theoretical work [25,26,27]. But the shift in the band edge as high as 1.37 eV was not found in any of the earlier reported work. The band gap tuning of α-Fe2O3 due to sulfur doping was reported to change the band gap to around 0.75 eV [28]. In our case, it is the activation of different processes such as pair-excitation, ligand field transition beyond LMCT that contribute to absorption in different range. Fe is a transition element that is responsible for strong magnetic and rich optical spectra in the visible region due to d-d transitions. The environment of Fe ion changes from being local to non-local for electronic transition and spin correlation, it forms a rich system in terms of magnetic and optical properties [1].
2 Materials and methods
Aqueous suspension of Ferritin was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and it was stored at a low temperature (<8 °C) in a refrigerator. A set of eight samples was prepared using the sol–gel method for UV–VIS measurements. In the first step, a measured volume of suspension was poured on clean Si (100) substrates equilibrated at 40 °C on a hot plate for 20 min. In the second step, the seven samples were sintered for 1 h at seven different temperatures from 100 to 700 °C with a gap of 100 °C for each next sample using a muffle furnace (Khera, model no. KI-179 B) with a deviation of ±4 °C. One of the samples was kept “as prepared” (40 °C) for reference. Afterward, the dry powder was removed from substrates using a spatula. Then powder was suspended in glycerol and the suspension was homogenized using an ultrasonic bath (KUDOS, Model SK2210HP). The suspension was quite stable for days. The concentration of the solution for measurement is 0.25 mg/ml. The UV 3000+ spectrometer (LABINDIA, Model: UV 3000+ UV/VIS Spectrophotometer) was used to acquire the data with subtracted background. The scanning range of the wavelength was from 190 to 800 nm with a step size of 2 nm.
The same powder sample was also used for the magnetic measurements using a VSM (Lake Shore VSM, Model: 7410 Series VSM) which is facilitated with a dynamic range from 1 × 10−7 to 103 emu with an accuracy of ±0.5% plus noise which is 0.75 µemu at maximum. The samples were loaded in the vibrating rod sample holder, and then they were placed between the magnetic coils. The magnetic field was swept from −20 to +20 kilo Oersted (kOe) and a complete cycle of magnetic induction measurement took around 40 min for each sample at room temperature. The low temperature (15–305 K) magnetic study was performed to obtain the zero-field cooled (ZFC) and field cooled (FC) curves. The samples for microscopy study and XRD were prepared using the identical method on Si (100) substrates. But there was no need to peel off the powder from the substrate. Measurements were performed on dried films on the substrate directly. The SEM operated at 10 kV (JFEI Nova Nano SEM-450) was used to study the surface morphology of the samples. EDX spectroscopy was carried out on the same sample for estimating elemental composition in a single lot without breaking a vacuum. Two-dimensional (2D) XRD was carried out in grazing incidence geometry at photon energy of 10 keV at BL-11 beamline of INDUS-II synchrotron at Raja Ramanna Center for Advanced Technologies in India. In grazing incidence geometry (GID-2D), 2D intensity maps were recorded to analyze any preferential orientation of crystallites to the substrate on the MAR3450 image plate detector. Data acquisition time was 30 min for each measurement. The wave vector q define as; q = 2π (sin α + sin β)/λ. The grazing angle of incidence (α) was kept fixed at 0.5°.
3 Analysis of results
3.1 Scanning electron microscopy
The surface morphology of the samples was studied using a scanning electron microscope. Figure 1 shows the micrographs corresponding to samples treated at all different temperatures from panel (a) to (h). The morphology of the “as prepared” sample (a) appears as aggregated mass or clumps of materials or Ferritin. The surface morphology in panels (b, 100 °C) and (c, 200 °C) appears quite homogeneous. Some granular structure is noted in panels (d, 300 °C), whereas panels (e, 400 °C), (f, 500 °C) and (g, 600 °C) show needle-shaped objects. The panel (h, 700 °C) illustrates flake-like objects. These flakes, when looked at carefully, have their own granular internal structure. From these observations, it became quite obvious that estimation of particle size and shape from the surface morphology is difficult. One main reason is that the inorganic iron oxide phase is buried deep inside the organic shells. A lump of such material often appears continuous medium. Even after the thermal decomposition of the organic shell, the debris of the organic shell remains mixed with the iron oxide particles. Particle size often becomes clearly visible under SEM when low concentration sol gets dried on the surface with clear separation among particles. In all microscopy techniques, it is often a challenge to locate such a tiny portion of the area on a macroscopically large sample surface. The surface morphology, though, has no relation to magnetic and optical properties since these specimens were peeled off the substrate before making magnetic and optical measurements. It is mainly the phase change of iron oxide particles that affects the physical properties. The determination of particle size using XRD and SEM has been achieved earlier [6]. EDX measurements were also performed on the samples for determining the weight percentage ratio of the elements in the bottom-right corner of Fig. 1.
Iron (Fe) is mainly present in the core of the Ferritin molecule, whereas carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) forms the organic shell. Oxygen (O) is usually present in the core as well as in the organic shell. In the temperature range from 300–400 °C, the relative concentration of carbon and nitrogen significantly drops, whereas iron and oxygen concentration relatively goes up. This prominent change in relative elemental concentrations marks the phenomenon of “burning down” of the organic shell as it cannot withstand such high temperature. It appears that a portion of carbon and nitrogen elements smokes out as gases on the burning of organic shell. After 400 °C, the sample consists of a relatively larger concentration of iron and oxygen elements. The increase in Fe and O weight percentage represents the relative increase because of the absence of other elements at a higher temperature. XRD study of the samples was published earlier which relate temperature dependent evolution of structural phases with magnetic properties [6]. It was found that there was no signature of crystallization of Fe2O3 up to 400 °C, a feeble signature of α-Fe2O3 were seen at 500 °C, which were unambiguously confirmed at 700 °C. The crystallite size determined using Scherrer formula, grew from ~23 to ~50 nm. Below 400 °C, since there was no peak corresponding to Fe2O3, It is obvious that particles were amorphous. Machala et al. coined the term “x-ray amorphous” for particles smaller than 5 nm [29]. However, DSC indicates amorphous to crystalline phase transition close to 500 °C [6]. The amorphous phase lying in intermediate temperature range (400–500 °C) is characterized with stronger magnetization as compared to crystalline phase (700 °C) and molecular phase (40 °C). It is interesting to relate EDX finding with XRD results: the temperature assisted destruction of organic shell takes place at 400 °C, while the crystallization took place at 500 °C and above, revealing the important mechanism of crystallization and particle growth.
As the phase identification of Fe2O3 and its structural evolution was already known, we carried out 2D diffraction study to analyze the orientation distribution of crystallites. The 2D diffraction patterns from all samples are shown in Fig. 2. In the case of preferred orientation, the intensity from a given crystalline plane would be converging to a spot in a certain direction [30]. The observed semi-circular rings with uniform intensity throughout are a clear signature of the random distribution of crystalline planes. In the diffraction terminology, we say that there is a powder nature of the crystallites observed. We begin with the identification of the sample annealed at 700 °C where the nucleated crystallites are grown to a large extent for unambiguous identification of phase. The hematite phase (α-Fe2O3) was confirmed with the four characteristic rings indexed as (012), (104), (110) and (113) as seen in Fig. 2h (listed in Table 1). In the middle range of annealing 400–500 °C, only (104) and (110) planes generate prominent intensity, whereas (012) plane generate feeble intensity and (113) was absent. At the lower temperature range (40–400 °C), the α-Fe2O3 phase could not be identified as the diffraction ring at q = 2.235 remains unidentified which is likely to be originated from the organic matrix or some planes of FeOOH [6]. This uncharacteristic diffraction ring was not seen for heat treatment at 400 °C and above. We had similar kinds of observations in our earlier studies on a similar set of samples using high-resolution conventional XRD [6]. Figure 3 shows the diffraction profiles of all samples obtained from each 2D intensity map (panel) in Fig. 2 by integrating intensity along polar angle (χ) from –90° to +90° along with the semi-circular rings. This way it appears as a conventional (1-dimensional) XRD plot with lower resolution as collimating slits are not used in 2D grazing incidence diffraction. The intensity peaks do not appear sharp as often seen in the conventional XRD pattern. Therefore, any kind of peak shape analysis would provide a dubious interpretation here. The peak shape analysis had been done earlier using high-resolution conventional XRD [6]. The 2D-XRD here unambiguously provides identification of crystalline phase and their powder character in all samples.
4 Magnetic measurements
The magnetic characterization of the two samples annealed at 400 and 500 °C was carried out using VSM. The measurements of M-H loops were carried out at room temperature, which is shown in Fig. 4a, b. The range of magnetic field (H) was varied from –2 T to +2 T in a cycle. A detailed study of magnetization at all annealing temperatures (40°–700 °C) was carried out earlier [6]. Among the various crystalline phases of Fe2O3, maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) show the highest magnetic induction (74–103 emu/g), and the reported value of magnetic induction in hematite (α-Fe2O3) lies in the range from 1–15 emu/g [31,32,33]. The low value of magnetic induction in hematite is due to its anti-ferromagnetic properties, the magnetic induction in the anti-ferromagnetic systems arises mainly due to defects and disorder [32]. In this magnetic study, our objective was to study ZFC and FC at a constant magnetic field of 200 Oe. The samples had shown high magnetism in the annealing temperature range of 400–500 °C. The magnetism in this range was partially attributed to the amorphous phase and partly due to the disordered structure at the surface of the nanoparticles leading to spin glass magnetic disorder [34]. The magnetization in units of emu/g was obtained by dividing the magnetic induction with the total sample mass. The deviations of magnetic moments with earlier study were likely due to the presence of unknown quantity of non-magnetic organic debris, which is external to magnetic system (Fe2O3). The magnetization values at different temperatures may suffer from different relative contributions of organic debris to the overall sample mass since the exact ratio of debris and magnetic component (Fe2O3) was not controlled.
The defects are responsible for demolishing the super-exchange interaction of the Fe3+–O2−–Fe3+ leading to the ferromagnetic ordering [32, 35, 36]. A bulk phase of α-Fe2O3 shows weak magnetization (non-zero) between Morin temperature (TM ~ 263 K) and Neel temperature (TN ~ 955 K) due to spin canting [37]. The anti-ferromagnetic coupling of successive planes along (001) direction would mutually cancel out magnetic moments below Morin temperature. The Morin temperature was determined from the first derivative of the ZFC plot. The ZFC plot was first fitted with a polynomial of third-order and then the polynomial was differentiated to obtain first order derivative (dMZFC/dT) which is plotted in their corresponding insets in Fig. 4. The peak of the first derivative represents the Morin temperature [38]. It is well known that the Morin temperature depends on particle size and Morin temperature increases with particle size [39]. In our case, the Morin temperatures were found to be ~77 K and ~171 K for annealing temperatures of 400 °C and 500 °C respectively. It can be inversely inferred from this observation that nanoparticle size is smaller at lower annealing temperature (400 °C) as we could not directly estimate the particle size from XRD due to the absence of diffraction peak with regard to our earlier observations [6].
FC-ZFC curves bifurcate in two branches with successively increasing the gap up to 15 K. When cooled under the applied field (200 Oe), the magnetic induction increases with the decrease of cooling temperature. The thermal energy due to temperature is responsible for the randomization of spins. On cooling the thermal energy drops and the magnetic spins are more effectively aligned spins along the field that enhances the induction. In the absence of field (ZFC), the magnetic induction decrease up to 15 K. In an anti-ferromagnetic system such as (α-Fe2O3), the spin disorder causes a net magnetic moment even in absence of field. The spin disorder is caused by structural surface disorder and thermal randomization. By cooling, we reduce the effect of thermal randomization and hence net magnetic moment goes down with cooling. Magnetic coupling is often known to enhance ligand field (d-d) transition and pair excitations [39].
5 UV–VIS analysis
The optical absorption spectra in the range of 200–800 nm for all samples are shown in Fig. 5. The theory of optical absorption spectra for iron oxide compounds is well established [1, 40]. The absorption spectra of Fe3+ ion complexes are optically active in the visible region. Therefore, these materials exhibit multiple color variations. The optical absorption occurs due to ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT), ligand field transition (d-d transition) and pair excitation of neighboring Fe3+ ions due to magnetic coupling. Hematite (α-Fe2O3) crystal forms a hexagonal structure where Fe3+ cation form octahedral coordination with O2− anions. According to crystal field theory (CFT), 3d atomic orbitals of Fe are split into two sets of orbitals conventionally labeled as t2g and eg as shown in the Tanabe-Sugano diagram [1] in Fig. 6. The energy levels t2g and eg are further split by exchange energy which results in two sets of t2g and eg orbitals, one for majority spin and the other for minority spin. The ligand field transitions take place between states that arise from different electronic configurations of the orbitals. LMCT, ligand field transitions and pair excitations had been identified from transient absorption decay using femtosecond time-resolved spectroscopy, since different processes are characterized with a their unique decay-time [1]. LMCT, pair excitation and ligand field transition contribute to absorption in different spectral regions. For the identification of the processes, the entire wavelength range of the absorption spectra is divided into four regions [1, 41]: Region 1 (250–400 nm) mainly arises due to LMCT transitions and also from the Fe3+ ligand field transitions 6A1 (6S) to 4T1 (4P) at 290–310 nm, 6A1 (6S) to 4E (4D) and 6A1 (6S) to 4T1 (4D) at 360–380 nm. The spectroscopic symbols such as A, S, T, P, E and D have their conventional meaning as referred to earlier [42]. Region II (400–600 nm) is assigned to pair excitation processes 6A1 (6S) + 6A1 (6S) to 4T1 (4G) + 4T1 (4G) at 485–550 nm overlapping the 6A1 (6S) to 4E, 4A1 (4G) ligand field transition at 430 nm and the charge–transfer band. Region III (600–750 nm) is attributed due to 6A1 (6S) to 4T2 (4G) ligand field transition at around 640 nm. Region IV (750–900 nm) normally corresponds to transition 6A1 (6S) to 4T1 (4G) at around 900 nm. In our measurements, the scanning wavelength region extends to only 800 nm, thus region IV is partially included in the spectra shown in Fig. 5. The insets in Fig. 5 represent the normalized area (normalized integrated intensity) corresponding to these four regions in the form of column bars to highlight the contribution of the different processes. The normalized area (<A>) defined in Eq. (1) as:
where Ai is area under the spectral regions (i = 1 for R1 and so on). It is to be noted that there is no sharp distinction between these regions and the processes may overlap at the boundary of these defined regions, yet such demarcation provides the convenience of analysis of absorption spectra.
For the “as prepared” sample (40 °C), the absorption mainly occurs in region I, which suggests the dominance of LMCT processes. As the annealing temperature of the samples increases, the absorption process shifts toward the red end of the spectrum. For the sample sintered at 500 °C, the absorption in region II is highly dominant which is caused by pair excitation neighboring Fe3+ ions that often results due to magnetic coupling. The study of magnetic measurements also shows a stronger magnetic moment (Fig. 4) in this temperature range (400–500 °C). The sample annealed at 700 °C marks the further red shift toward region III which arises due to ligand field transition 6A1 (6S)–4T2 (4G). Rather the absorption spectrum becomes almost flat in the entire visible region which signifies that all three processes are contributing evenly with the pair transition process having slight dominance over LMCT and ligand field (d-d) transitions. The activation of different processes in separate wavelength ranges leads to the shifting of the band edge. The absorption band edge was determined using the Tauc’s relation [43] as the following Eq. (2):
Here, n is an exponent that is 1/2 for direct band gap and 2 for indirect band gap [9, 44]. The above equation fits well for n = 1/2 suggesting a direct band gap system. We plotted (αhv)2 vs. hv for all samples that are shown in Fig. 7 with insets representing the whole absorption spectra. The linear extrapolation that intersects the energy axis represents the value of the bandgap. It can be observed that often 2 or 3 linear slops existed for the various samples. These different band edges correspond to different transition processes involved in the absorption. The presence of various processes also results in the blurring of the absorption edge. The different band edges found using the above process are arranged in Table 2 for convenience. The shifting of the band edge from 2.65 to 1.28 eV is a very large red shift that marks a kind of insulator-to-semiconductor transition.
6 Discussion
The optical properties of iron-based TMO arise from heterogeneity of electronic states due to the multiplicity of coordination of Fe3+ ion with neighboring ligands. We have a set of samples that include, at one end, dry ferritin powder (40 °C) and hematite crystalline phase (700 °C) at the other end. The samples in the intermediate temperature range provide a set of iron oxide with a varying degree of crystalline order between these two ends. The core of a native Ferritin constitutes ferrihydrite (FeOOH) molecules that could move in and out of the cavity for carrying out biological processes [14]. A dry ferritin powder would contain densely packed molecules that are very different from continuous solid phase such as α-Fe2O3. The annealing at higher temperatures gives way to the formation of Fe2O3 after releasing of water from the ferrihydrite molecules [6, 14]. The Fe2O3 initially in the solid phase begins to crystallize at around 500 °C, which then transforms into a stable structure of hematite at 700 °C. The organic shell of the Ferritin begins to erode at around 300 °C and it is almost destroyed around 450 °C which is evident from the EDX analysis in Fig. 1. The crystalline phase of α-Fe2O3 begins to appear beyond 400 °C which indicates that the crystallization of Fe2O3 is related to the destruction of the organic shell of ferritin. It is obvious that the breaking of the shell allows the particles to grow through sintering and coalescence processes. The particles grow bigger in the form of needles or flakes as seen in the SEM images. It can be seen that the optical absorption strongly depends on the temperature of the thermal treatment. For dry ferritin powder (40°), the optical absorption mainly takes place in the UV limit which represents high energy LMCT transitions. Pair transitions and ligand field (d-d) transitions are mostly absent. This observation is consistent with the fact that iron molecular complexes do not constitute a continuous solid justifying the absence of pair excitations and coordinated ligand field transitions. As the sintering temperature is increased the spectrum tail shifts toward the red end. At 400–500 °C, the intensity of pair-transitions eclipses the LMCT transitions. In this temperature range, the samples show relatively strong magnetic intensity. The pair transitions are associated with the magnetic coupling of neighboring Fe3+ ions through O2− ions. In this intermediate temperature range, the crystalline phase begins to emerge with the amorphous surface disorder which is responsible for stronger magnetism since the exact cancellation of magnetic moments originating from anti-parallel spins was not possible due to the presence of surface disorder. In this temperature range, iron oxide forms a solid phase but the proper crystalline order is lacking. In the high-temperature range (500–700 °C), as the crystalline phase of α-Fe2O3 becomes more distinct, the spectrum was further red shifted due to activation of ligand field transition from 6A1 (6S) to 4T2 (4G). In principle, all such electronic transitions are Laporte and spin forbidden. But transitions become allowed in practice due to magnetic coupling of neighboring Fe3+ ions and hybridization of Fe 3d orbitals with O 2p orbitals [1]. The α-Fe2O3 forms the corundum structure with octahedral coordination of Fe3+ ions with neighboring O2− ions. The multiplicity of the electronic state arises due to high spin and low spin configurations. The ligand field transition (d-d) is described by CFT with the help of the Tanabe-Sugano diagram [1]. The optical spectrum of the sample with the highest temperature (700 °C) treatment spreads almost uniformly through the UV and visible range with a slight bulge of intensity in the middle of the visible region due to magnetically coupled pair transitions. It means all processes such as LMCT, pair excitation and d-d transitions are active for the samples at the high end of annealing temperature. In the continuous solid phase, d-d electronic levels are rather d-d bands. The width of the bands depends on the degree of overlapping of atomic orbitals. The distribution of nanoparticle size, which is a very common feature, will result in a varying degree of overlapping and hence a varied range of bandwidths. The distribution of particle size would thus result in the blurring of the absorption band edge. Tauc’s relation was used to find the type of the band gap (direct or indirect) and also to estimate the absorption band edge. The fittings of the absorption spectra suggest a direct band gap transition. Both kinds of results are available for direct as well as indirect band gaps for the α-Fe2O3 system in the published literature [44, 45]. Though the absorption edge with minimum energy (or maximum wavelength) is the true band edge but multiplicity of linear slopes occurs as other stronger absorption due to pair excitation and LMCT dominates at the high energy end of the spectrum. The shifting of the minimum energy band edge from 2.65 to 1.28 eV is remarkable which indeed highlights the scope of tailoring of band bap of the material transforming an insulator into a semiconductor.
7 Conclusions
An aqueous sol of Ferritin was dried and heat treated to synthesize materials with tuneable optical properties. The samples were synthesized using the sol–gel method and varied thermal treatment was given to bring about the phase change from ferrihydrite to hematite crystalline phase (α-Fe2O3). The optical absorption was studied in a viscous liquid medium by UV–visible spectroscopy. 2D-XRD analysis confirms the presence of hematite crystalline phase and that the crystallites are in powder form in all samples. EDX analysis found that the thermal treatment burns down the organic shell of Ferritin at around 450 °C. It was noted that the crystallization of Fe2O3 took place after the destruction of the organic shell. The optical spectra of the samples have strong bearing of annealing temperature, which in turn implies that variation in phases of the Fe3+ ionic compound enriches the optical spectrum through activation of pair excitation and ligand field transitions to add to LMCT processes. In the mid temperature range of 400–500 °C, the pair excitation mechanism become strong and dominates over LMCT. The mid temperature range was also characterized with strong magnetic induction, reaffirming that the pair excitations are usually a result of magnetic coupling of Fe3+ ion pairs in the system. In the high-temperature range of 500–700 °C, ligand field (d-d) transitions become active to shift the absorption edge toward the red end. This study brings about a facile way of tuning the band gap from 2.65 to 1.28 eV, which covers a wide range for optical and electronic applications.
References
He YP, Miao YM, Li CR et al. (2005) Size and structure effect on optical transitions of iron oxide nanocrystals. Phys Rev B - Condens Matter Mater Phys 71:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.71.125411
MacHala L, Tuček J, Zbořil R (2011) Polymorphous transformations of nanometric iron(III) oxide: a review. Chem Mater 23:3255–3272. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm200397g
Ivantsov R, Ivanova O, Zharkov SM et al. (2020) Magnetic circular dichroism in the canted antiferromagnet α-Fe2O3: bulk single crystal and nanocrystals. J Magn Magn Mater 498:166208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.166208
Bhowmik RN, Sarvanan A (2010) Surface magnetism, Morin transition, and magnetic dynamics in antiferromagnetic α-Fe2O3 (hematite) nanograins. J Appl Phys 107:053916-1–10
Frandsen C, Mørup S (2005) Spin rotation in α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles by interparticle interactions. Phys Rev Lett 94(1–4):027202
Kumar S, Thakur A, Gupta SK et al. (2020) A facile route to synthesis of ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic phases of iron oxide nanoparticles by controlled heat treatment of ferritin. J Supercond Nov Magn 33:3841–3852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-020-05649-1
Sharma P, Dhiman S, Kumari S, et al. (2019) Revisiting the physiochemical properties of Hematite (-Fe2O3) nanoparticle and exploring its bio-environmental application. Mater Res Express 6. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab30ef
Sivula K, Zboril R, Le Formal F et al. (2010) Photoelectrochemical water splitting with mesoporous hematite prepared by a solution-based colloidal approach. J Am Chem Soc 132:7436–7444. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja101564f
Kumar P, Rawat N, Hang DR et al. (2015) Controlling band gap and refractive index in dopant-free α-Fe2O3 films. Electron Mater Lett 11:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13391-014-4002-0
Uchida M, Flenniken ML, Allen M et al. (2006) Targeting of cancer cells with ferrimagnetic ferritin cage nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 128:16626–16633. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0655690
Bhowmik RN, Mitra P, Choudhury RJ, Reddy VR (2020) Substrate effect on the structural phase formation and magnetic properties of α-Fe2O3 and Ti doped α-Fe2O3 thin films. Appl Surf Sci 501:144224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144224
Lu Y, Yin Y, Mayers BT, Xia Y (2002) Modifying the surface properties of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles through a sol-gel approach. Nano Lett 2:183–186. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl015681q
Gupta AK, Gupta M (2005) Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 26:3995–4021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.012
Jutz G, Van Rijn P, Santos Miranda B, Böker A (2015) Ferritin: a versatile building block for bionanotechnology. Chem Rev 115:1653–1701. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400011b
Volatron J, Carn F, Kolosnjaj-Tabi J et al. (2017) Ferritin protein regulates the degradation of iron oxide nanoparticles. Small 13:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201602030
He D, Marles-Wright J (2015) Ferritin family proteins and their use in bionanotechnology. N Biotechnol 32:651–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2014.12.006
Choi WJ, Yano K, Cha M, et al. (2022) Chiral phonons in microcrystals and nanofibrils of biomolecules. Nat Photon. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-022-00969-1
Xing X, Chen M, Gong Y et al. (2020) Building memory devices from biocomposite electronic materials. Sci Technol Adv Mater 21:100–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2020.1725395
Lv Z, Zhou Y, Han ST, Roy VAL (2018) From biomaterial-based data storage to bio-inspired artificial synapse. Mater Today 21:537–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.12.001
Cobo I, Li M, Sumerlin BS, Perrier S (2015) Smart hybrid materials by conjugation of responsive polymers to biomacromolecules. Nat Mater 14:143–149. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4106
Raeis-Hosseini N, Lee JS (2017) Resistive switching memory using biomaterials. J Electroceram 39:223–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10832-017-0104-z
Singh A, Konovalov O, Novak J, Vorobiev A (2010) The sequential growth mechanism of a protein monolayer at the air-water interface. Soft Matter 6:3826–3831. https://doi.org/10.1039/b925365c
Singh A, Konovalov O (2013) Measuring elastic properties of a protein monolayer at water surface by lateral compression. Soft Matter 9:2845–2851. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2sm26410b
Hench LL, West JK (1990) The sol-gel process. Chem Rev 90:33–72. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00099a003
Alagiri M, Hamid SBA (2015) Sol–gel synthesis of α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles and its photocatalytic application. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 74:783–789
Aydin C, Mansour SA, Alahmed ZA, Yakuphanoglu F (2012) Structural and optical characterization of sol-gel derived boron doped Fe2O3 nanostructured films. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 62:397–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-012-2740-8
Mohanty A, Parida A, Raut RK, Behera RK (2022) Ferritin: a promising nanoreactor and nanocarrier for bionanotechnology. ACS Bio Med Chem Au. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomedchemau.2c00003
Xia C, Jia Y, Tao M, Zhang Q (2013) Tuning the band gap of hematite α-Fe2O3 by sulfur doping. Phys Lett Sect A: Gen At Solid State Phys 377:1943–1947
MacHala L, Zboril R, Gedanken A (2007) Amorphous iron (III) oxide—a review. J Phys Chem B 111:4003–4018. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp064992s
Kim CY (2020) Atomic structure of hematite (α-Fe2O3) nanocube surface; synchrotron X-ray diffraction study. Nano-Struct Nano-Objects 23:100497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2020.100497
Cao D, Li H, Pan L et al. (2016) High saturation magnetization of γ 3-Fe2O3 nano-particles by a facile one-step synthesis approach. Sci Rep 6:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32360
Wu J, Mao S, Ye ZG et al. (2010) Room-temperature weak ferromagnetism induced by point defects in α-Fe2O3. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2:1561–1564. https://doi.org/10.1021/am1002052
Bhavani P, Rajababu CH, Arif MD et al. (2017) Synthesis of high saturation magnetic iron oxide nanomaterials via low temperature hydrothermal method. J Magn Magn Mater 426:459–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.09.049
Kodama RH, Berkowitz AE, McNiff EJJ, Foner S (1996) Surface spin disorder in NiFe2O4 nanoparticles. Phys Rev Lett 77:394–397
Phu ND, Ngo DT, Hoang LH, et al. (2011) Crystallization process and magnetic properties of amorphous iron oxide nanoparticles. J Phys D Appl Phys 44. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/44/34/345002
Silva MF, De Oliveira LAS, Ciciliati MA, et al. (2013) Nanometric particle size and phase controlled synthesis and characterization of γ-Fe2O3 or (α + γ)-Fe2O3 by a modified sol-gel method. J Appl Phys 114. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4821253
Bhowmik RN, Saravanan A (2010) Surface magnetism, Morin transition, and magnetic dynamics in antiferromagnetic α-Fe2O3 (hematite) nanograins. J Appl Phys 107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3327433
Chakrabarty S, Jana TK, De K, et al. (2014) Morphology dependent magnetic properties of α-Fe2O3 nanostructures. Mater Res Express 1. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/1/4/046104
Biju CS, Raja DH, Padiyan DP (2014) Glycine assisted hydrothermal synthesis of α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles and its size dependent properties. Chem Phys Lett 610–611:103–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2014.07.024
Sherman DM, Waite TD (1985) Electronic spectra of Fe3+ oxides and oxide hydroxides in the near IR to near UV. Am Mineralogist 70:1262–1269
Wheeler DA, Wang G, Ling Y et al. (2012) Nanostructured hematite: synthesis, characterization, charge carrier dynamics, and photoelectrochemical properties. Energy Environ Sci 5:6682–6702. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee00001f
Huheey JE, Keiter EA, Keiter RL (2000) Inorganic chemistry: principles of structure and reactivity, 4th edn. Pearson Education Asia Pte. Ltd., New York
Tauc J, Grigorovici R, Vancu A (1966) Optical properties and electronic structure of amorphous germanium. Phys Status Solidi 15:627–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1123-3_5
Mallick P, Dash BN (2013) X-ray diffraction and UV-visible characterizations of α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles annealed at different temperature. Nanosci Nanotechnol 3:130–134. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.nn.20130305.04
Seo O, Tayal A, Kim J et al. (2019) Tuning of structural, optical band gap, and electrical properties of room-temperature-grown epitaxial thin films through the Fe2O3:NiO ratio. Sci Rep 9:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41049-9
Choi S, Lefèvre C, Roulland F et al. (2012) Optical transitions in magnetoelectric Ga0.6Fe1.4O3 from 0.73 to 6.45 eV. J Vac Sci Technol B 30:41204. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.4721649
Acknowledgements
SK thankfully acknowledges the University Grants Commission for National Fellowship scheme for SC (erstwhile–RGNF, Lett. No. F1-17.1/2016-17/RGNF-2015-17-SC-HIM-18502/(SA-III/Website)) for the financial support as fellowship toward pursuance of Ph.D. We acknowledge the UV–VIS facility established at the Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla. We also acknowledge the AMRC, IIT Mandi for SEM facility (JFEI, Nova Nano SEM-450).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, S., Kumar, M., Velaga, S. et al. Tuneable optical properties of Fe2O3 magnetic nanoparticles synthesized from Ferritin. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 105, 650–661 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-022-05992-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-022-05992-w