1 Introduction

At present, porous adsorbent materials such as silica aerogels, carbon aerogels, and graphene aerogels with excellent adsorption properties have been studied extensively. As it is reported, silica aerogels are efficient for adsorptive removal of naphthalene from aqueous solution [1]. Ultralight carbon aerogels synthesized from nano-cellulose exhibited highly selective oil adsorption [2], and carbon fiber aerogels made from raw cotton showed efficient and recyclable adsorption for oils and organic solvents [3]. In addition, flexible graphene aerogels [4], graphene/nano-fibrillated cellulose aerogel [5], and magnetic polystyrene/Fe3O4/graphene aerogel composites [6] were all shown to have superior adsorption properties.

Nevertheless, using porous photocatalysts with high adsorptivity and photocatalytic activity is a more effective way for removing dye pollutants in wastewater [7, 8]. To date, aerogel-based photocatalysts [9,10,11,12] and photocatalyst-loaded composite aerogels or porous materials [13,14,15,16,17,18] have been attracting considerable research interests as highly efficient environmental purification materials, because the integration of porous materials and photocatalyst may be conducive to performing the function of adsorption and photocatalysis simultaneously. Silica aerogels are unique porous materials with high optical transmittance and strong adsorptivity due to their large-specific surface area and pore volume [19,20,21]. Thus, it is of significance to develop a photocatalyst-SiO2 composite aerogel with higher adsorptivity and visible light photocatalytic activity so as to remove efficiently the pollutants in the environment.

In order to achieve higher adsorption and photocatalytic efficiency of photocatalyst-SiO2 composite aerogel, effective strategies should start from important factors such as the type of photocatalysts, the pore-forming mechanism and especially the fabrication process of composite aerogels. As is well known, TiO2 is a photocatalyst exhibiting relatively high photocatalytic activity under irradiation of ultra-violet light. Over the past few years, many studies have been carried out by sensitizing TiO2 with a narrower band-gap semiconductor such as CdS (2.4 eV), WO3, or other metal and non-metals— such as Sb, Cr, C, etc—so as to further improve the visible-light-driven photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2 [22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. In the meantime, mesoporous anatase TiO2 was also reported for its efficient photocatalytic performance [29]. In addition, co-assembly of Au and TiO2 particles into multicomponent 3D aerogels was also reported [30].

Apart from the process optimization for producing aerogels, another powerful strategy for enhancing porous structure and adsorption is utilizing templates such as bacterial cellulose (BC) in the synthesis of aerogel materials [31, 32]. Bacterial cellulose (BC) is an organic compound with the formula ((C6H10O5)n) produced from certain types of bacteria. It was reported that BC could be used for improving the porous structure of the aerogel, and flexible aerogels with interpenetrating network structure could be obtained by freeze drying of BC-silica composite gels [33]. It was also demonstrated that BC could be used as a suitable template for synthesizing CoFe2O4 by immersing it in the FeSO4/CoCl2 solution, and in this way a lightweight porous magnetic aerogel could be synthesized [34]. By comparison with other well-known structure-directing agents such as cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (Lauryl SDS), the advantage of using bacterial cellulose as template is that porous materials with higher porosity and larger pore size could be easily obtained. For example, porous TiO2-anatase films prepared using CTAB and SDS as templates exhibited pore sizes of only 1.5–3.1 nm [35]. In contrast, our recent research demonstrated that SiO2-(WO3)x·TiO2 composite aerogels prepared using bacterial cellulose as template showed higher pore sizes of 13 nm and pore volume with 1.33 cm3/g compared to those obtained without BC template (with pore size and pore volume being 8 nm and 0.86 cm3/g, respectively) [36].

In our previous research, we also investigated the effects of different templates such as ginkgo biloba leaf, starch, and BC on the specific surface area and pore volume of SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels prepared by a similar solvothermal method. The BET analysis results indicated that the composite aerogels with the highest specific surface area and pore volume were obtained by using BC as template rather than Ginkgo biloba leaf and starch, which demonstrated that BC has advantages over ginkgo biloba leaf and starch as templates.

In general, multicomponent aerogels can be prepared from wet gels by supercritical drying [30], or freeze drying [37]. However, the harsh preparation process with higher pressure/temperature or extreme lower temperature is not convenient for production on a large scale. Moreover, as for the photocatalyst-loaded silica aerogels, how to guarantee attaining highly porous structures and loading more photocatalyst particles with higher crystallinity into the composite aerogels simultaneously has been a challenge. In our previous research, synthesis of SiO2-WxTiO2 composite aerogels via solvothermal crystallization followed by freeze drying was conducted [38], and a highly porous SiO2-(WO3)x•TiO2 composite aerogel was prepared by an ambient pressure drying method with a solvothermal-assisted crystallization process [36]. However, the effect of solvothermal crystallization process on the microstructure and properties of the composite aerogels needs to be further investigated.

Therefore, in this work, the influence of solvothermal crystallization on the microstructure, pore characteristics, and adsorption/photocatalytic activity of SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels synthesized via ambient pressure drying has been investigated systematically. The results are helpful for preparing SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels with higher adsorption and photocatalytic activity. Moreover, it is also significant for preparing other multicomponent oxide composite aerogels with functional properties.

2 Experimental

2.1 Synthesis of SiO2-BC composite gel

The SiO2-BC composite gel was synthesized by using industrial water glass (Na2O·nSiO2 with n = 3.5, density = 1.53 g/cm3) as silica source. First, the water glass was diluted with deionized water (the volume ratio of water glass/deionized water = 1:6), and then ion-exchanged with strongly acidic cation-exchange resin 732, to obtain silicic acid of pH = 2–3. The bacterial cellulose (BC, Shanghai Yifang Rural Technology Holdings Co. Ltd) was heated to 90 °C in a 2 M KOH solution for 6 h, and the darkened BC obtained was washed repeatedly with deionized water until it was translucent, so as to remove sugar. After that, the BC was made into a slurry with a juicer (the volume ratio of BC/deionized water = 1:1). Then, the BC/SiO2 composite sol was obtained by mixing the BC slurry with the silicic acid (the volume ratio of silicic acid/slurry = 10:1). Finally, the pH of the composite sol was adjusted to 6–7 with 2 M ammonia solution, and after aging for 20 min the BC-SiO2 composite gel was obtained.

2.2 Preparation of SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels

The BC-SiO2 composite gel, after aging for 2 h at room temperature, was divided into small pieces with volumes of around 1 cm3 and immersed in the WO3-TiO2 precursor solution for 24 h. The WO3-TiO2 precursor solution was prepared by mixing TiCl4 and H2WO4 solution with a molar ratio of W/Ti = 2%. Then the gel was transferred to a 200 mL Teflon-lined autoclave with addition of 100 mL ethanol and underwent solvothermal reaction at 120–180 °C for 0.5–12 h. After that, surface modification of the SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite gel obtained was conducted in a mixed trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS)/hexane (VTMCS: Vhexane = 1:10) solution for 1–3 days until the gel could be floated on water. Finally, the modified gel was dried successively at 80, 100, and 150 °C for 2 h, respectively, yielding light-weight porous SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels. For comparison, SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels without using BC and solvothermal crystallization were also prepared according to the aforementioned method. According to our previous research, the as-prepared composite aerogels by the above method are hydrophobic [39]. In this work, hydrophilic composite aerogels were obtained after heat-treated at 500 °C for 2 h.

2.3 Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was carried out by X-ray diffraction (D/Max-3B, Japan) using Cu anode target, tube voltage of 40 kV and tube current of 45 mA. The micro-morphology of the composite aerogels was observed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, Hitachi S-4800, Japan) with accelerating voltage 5.0 kV and transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL JEM-2100 UHR) with accelerating voltage 200 kV. The specific surface area and pore characteristics of SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels were measured using a N2 adsorption-desorption specific surface area analyzer (SSA-4200, Beijing Biaode Electronic Technology Co. LTD). The specific surface area was calculated from N2 physisorption data using the Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET) equation. Pore volume and pore size distributions were obtained by the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method from the desorption stage. Differential thermal analysis (DTA, WCR-2D, Beijing Optical Instrument Factory) was used to analyze the thermal evolution process of the composite aerogels obtained.

2.4 Adsorption and photocatalytic activity tests

Rhodamine B (RhB), also known as rose red B, is mainly used for industrial dyeing. Once RhB enters the human body, it can form carcinogens through biological transformation. Hence, removing RhB from industrial wastewater is necessary for human health. In this experiment, RhB was used for evaluating the adsorption/photocatalytic activity of the SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels. First, 0.1 g of SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogel, heat-treated at 500 °C for 2 h, was added into a 250 mL beaker together with 100 mL of a 1 × 10−5 M RhB solution. Following our previous work, adsorption experiments were first conducted in a darkroom for 60 min. During the adsorption experiment, the RhB solution was stirred in the dark environment. At regular intervals, take the upper clear supernatant liquid and have a centrifugal separation process. Then the optical absorbance of the upper clear supernatant liquid was measured using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (UV751 GD) at a wavelength of 554 nm. After the adsorption experiment, the visible light photocatalytic experiment was performed by irradiating the sample for different times with a light intensity of 5.0 mW/cm2 using a high-pressure mercury lamp (125 W, λ > 380 nm) as light source. Finally, the concentration of RhB solution after adsorption/photocatalysis for different time can be determined according to the standard curve relating the absorbance and concentration of RhB standard solutions, and the adsorption/photocatalytic degradation rate can be calculated according to the following equation:

$$\eta = \left( {1 - \frac{C}{{C_0}}} \right) \times 100\%,$$

in which η is the adsorption rate or photocatalytic degradation rate, C0 is the initial concentration of the RhB solution before adsorption or photocatalysis, and C is the concentration after adsorption or photocatalytic degradation for a period of time.

In order to evaluate the recycling performance of the as-prepared SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels, the composite aerogels with solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C for 3 h and after heat-treatment at 500 °C for 2 h were selected to investigate the recyclable adsorption/photocatalytic degradation performance under simulated solar light. The adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of RhB were conducted at the same time. During the adsorption/photocatalysis experiment, the RhB solution containing SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogel samples were irradiated for different times using a metal halide lamp (ZY73-TD, 150 W) with the distance between the lamp and sample being about 64 cm. After each cycle, the sample was washed with water and ethanol for three times and was then dried under the metal halide lamp (ZY73-TD, 150 W) so as to remove surface adsorbates and restore the adsorption/photocatalytic activity.

3 Results and discussion

Figure 1a shows the XRD patterns of the SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels synthesized at different solvothermal crystallization temperatures. It can be seen that with the increase of solvothermal crystallization temperature, the crystallinity of composite aerogels increased gradually. Figure 1b shows the XRD patterns of the composite aerogels prepared via solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C for different time. It is obvious that anatase crystals appeared in all of the composite aerogels prepared via solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C for different time. In addition, the crystallinity of the composite aerogels increased significantly with the extension of solvothermal crystallization time.

Fig. 1
figure 1

XRD patterns of the composite aerogels using different solvothermal crystallization process parameters: a solvothermal crystallization for 3 h at different temperature; b solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C for different time

The FWHM (full-width at half-maximum) of the XRD diffraction peak corresponding to the anatase (101) crystal plane decreases with an increase of solvothermal crystallization time, which is related to the grain growth of the W0.02TiO2.06 nanoparticles distributed in the network structure of the aerogels. Moreover, the crystallite size of the SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels has been calculated using the Scherrer equation, as shown in Table 1. The Scherrer equation is as follows:

$$\tau = \frac{{k\lambda}}{{\beta\,{\mathrm{cos}}\,\theta}}$$

where t is the crystallite size; k is the shape factor with a typical value of about 0.9; λ is the X-ray wavelength; β is the line broadening at half the maximum intensity (FWHM); and θ is the Bragg angle (in degrees).

Table 1 The crystallite size of the SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels prepared with different solvothermal crystallization temperature and time

The SEM images of the SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels are shown in Fig. 2. It can be observed that the composite aerogels show a porous morphology, which indicates that the porous aerogel network could still be obtained by surface modification and ambient pressure drying after the solvothermal crystallization process. Moreover, the composite aerogels prepared using different solvothermal crystallization conditions exhibit different porous morphologies, indicating that the solvothermal crystallization process has a significant effect on the pore characteristics of the composite aerogels (see Fig. 2a–c). In addition, the composite aerogel obtained with solvothermal crystallization in the presence of BC exhibits a more high porous structure than that without BC (Fig. 2d).

Fig. 2
figure 2

SEM images of the aerogels synthesized with different solvothermal crystallization conditions: a 120 °C, 1 h; b 120 °C, 3 h; c 180 °C, 12 h; d 150 °C, 3 h without BC

The TEM images of the as-prepared composite aerogels with different solvothermal crystallization process parameters are shown in Fig. 3. It can be seen that the nanocrystalline grains are embedded in the porous network. With the increase in solvothermal temperature and time, the size of the W0.02TiO2.06 crystallites gradually increases. In particular, W0.02TiO2.06 grains with well-defined crystallinity can be seen clearly in the composite aerogels with solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C for 12 h (Fig. 3c). In contrast, the pure SiO2 aerogel samples synthesized without immersing the gel into TiCl4/H2WO4 solution only shows the porous network characteristic without any crystal grains evident in the TEM image (Fig. 3d).

Fig. 3
figure 3

TEM images of the composite aerogels prepared with different solvothermal crystallization process parameters: a 120 °C, 3 h; b 180 °C, 3 h; c 180 °C, 12 h; d BC-SiO2 aerogel (The pure SiO2 aerogel without loaded (WO3)x·TiO2 particles was prepared by a similar method via ambient-pressure drying with solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C for 3 h)

The results of the N2 adsorption analysis of the composite aerogels are shown in Fig. 4. The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms in Fig. 4a, b exhibit type IV curves with hysteresis loop between type H2 and H3 according to the IUPAC classification. This result indicates that the composite aerogels obtained have the typical characteristics of mesoporous materials, and the pore shape will vary with the solvothermal crystallization time. Figure 4c, d shows the pore size distributions of the composite aerogels. The pore diameter of the composite aerogels obtained with solvothermal crystallization at 120 °C is in the range of 4–12 nm. The pore size increases with increasing solvothermal time from 2 to 3 h, which can be ascribed to the hydrolysis of BC. The pore diameter of the composite aerogels prepared by solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C is in the range of 5–13 nm. These changes in the pore diameter of the SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels can be explained as follows. On one hand, the BC will hydrolyze during the solvothermal crystallization process, which would be expected to result in an increase in the pore diameter. On the other hand, W0.02TiO2.06 particles will deposit in the pores and on the surface of the SiO2 particle at the same time, which will reduce the pore size to some extent, due to the growth of W0.02TiO2.06 particles.

Fig. 4
figure 4

N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms a and b and pore size distributions c and d of the composite aerogels synthesized using different solvothermal crystallization conditions before surface modification and ambient pressure drying

A proposed mechanism for the formation of SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels prepared with solvothermal crystallization in the presence of BC is illustrated in Fig. 5. During the solvothermal crystallization, the hydrolysis of BC and deposition of W0.02TiO2.06 nanoparticles will occur simultaneously, which play an important role in controlling the final pore size and pore volume of the composite aerogels. Under condition involving sufficient solvothermal crystallization and complete hydrolysis of BC, the composite gel network will only be composed of SiO2 gel and W0.02TiO2.06 nanoparticles.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Proposed mechanism for the formation of SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 aerogels with solvothermal crystallization in the presence of BC and the corresponding TEM images of the as-prepared composite aerogels: a 120 °C, 3 h; b 150 °C, 3 h; c 180 °C, 3 h

It would be expected that the strongly polar hydroxyl groups produced by the hydrolysis of BC will promote the deposition of W0.02TiO2.06 particles on the surface of the pores in the composite gels. At lower temperatures, W0.02TiO2.06 nanoparticles will first grow on the surface of BC during the solvothermal crystallization process. Subsequently, the BC will hydrolyze into glucose with increasing solvothermal crystallization temperature and time [36]. Then, the generated glucose will play a role as the inducer and cross-linking agent to further induce the deposition of W0.02TiO2.06 particles and link the W0.02TiO2.06 grains with the SiO2 gel.

As is shown in Fig. 5, when the gel is dipped in the H2WO4-TiCl4 solution, W6+ and Ti4+ ions will sorb on the surface of BC. Then, during the solvothermal crystallization, the hydrolysis of BC and deposition of W0.02TiO2.06 particles into the network of composite gels will occur simultaneously. As a result, the composite aerogels with different surface morphologies can be obtained under different solvothermal crystallization conditions. When the solvothermal crystallization temperature and time is 120 °C and 3 h, respectively, only a small amount of W0.02TiO2.06 particles deposited onto the surface of BC and pore walls, and the as-prepared composite aerogel exhibits a highly porous network structure. When the solvothermal crystallization temperature and time are increased to 150 °C and 3 h, respectively, the amount of W0.02TiO2.06 particles deposited onto the pore walls will increase, as can be observed clearly in the TEM images. As is shown in Fig. 5b, the lattice fringes (0.35 nm) corresponding to the (101) [40] reflection plane of anatase can be observed, with the scope of lattice fringes ranging from 4.5 nm to 7.2 nm. When the solvothermal crystallization temperature rises to 180 °C (Fig. 5c), the scope of lattice fringes increases from 7.6 nm to 10.9 nm, which indicates that the anatase grains can grow significantly under the latter conditions.

Therefore, it is evident that the pore volume of the composite aerogels and the amount of W0.02TiO2.06 nanoparticles deposited onto the pore wall can be controlled by adjusting the solvothermal condition. During the solvothermal crystallization process, BC plays an important role in the formation of the porous structure and deposition of W0.02TiO2.06 particles. On one hand, BC plays a role as pore-expanding agent, and the decomposition of BC will be conducive to increasing the pore volume of the composite aerogels. On the other hand, BC functions as a structure-directing agent, and the decomposition of BC will induce the deposition and growth of W0.02TiO2.06 nanoparticles. Thus, solvothermal crystallization in the presence of BC is very favorable for obtaining SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels with higher pore volume and W0.02TiO2.06 crystallites, simultaneously. Furthermore, this method is also suitable for preparing other multicomponent composite aerogel materials.

The UV-Vis absorption spectra and (Ahv)1/2-hv relationship of the composite aerogels are shown in Fig. 6. The composite aerogels synthesized with solvothermal crystallization at 120 °C have lower absorption of UV light, which is presumably due to the lower amount of W0.02TiO2.06 particles deposited onto the pore wall in the composite aerogels. In addition, the high visible light absorption of the composite aerogels with solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C indicates that it may have improved visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity compared to the 120 °C-solvothermal sample.

Fig. 6
figure 6

UV-Vis absorption spectra of the composite aerogels with solvothermal crystallization at different temperature for 3 h

It is also reasonable that the optical absorption of the composite aerogels in the visible light region would be enhanced with the increase of crystallinity and grain growth. The calculated band gap of the composite aerogels is in the range of 2.75–2.8 eV, obviously lower than that of pure TiO2 (3.2 eV).

Figure 7 shows the effects of heat treatment on the network structure and surface hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity of the composite aerogels. The DTA curves of BC and the composite aerogels obtained with solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C for 12 h are shown in Fig. 7a. It can be seen that the BC has a stronger exothermic peak at 300 °C corresponding to its combustion. In comparison, the as-prepared composite aerogel has a smaller exothermic peak at 253 °C, which is due to the combustion of the intermediate product produced by BC hydrolysis during the solvothermal process. Figure 7b shows the photographs of the composite aerogels floating on water. The contact angle with water of the composite aerogels prepared by solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C for 12 h before heat-treatment was measured to be 148°, indicating that the composite aerogels are highly hydrophobic. The hydrophobicity of the composite aerogels is related to the surface modification of the wet gel with TMCL. In contrast, the composite aerogels after heat-treatment can be entirely wetted by water. This result indicates that the transition between hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity of the composite aerogels can be realized by heat-treatment at 500 °C for 2 h.

Fig. 7
figure 7

a DTA curves of BC and composite aerogel prepared by solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C for 12 h; b photographs of hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity and contact angle with water of the composite aerogels; c FTIR spectra of the composite aerogels before and after heat-treatment

As is shown in Fig. 7c, the super hydrophobicity caused by the methyl (–CH3) groups associated with the absorption peak at 1380 cm−1 will disappear after heat treatment [41, 42]. After heat treatment, owing to the decomposition of –CH3 groups, not only the composite aerogels with solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C for 12 h but also the aerogels with solvothermal crystallization at 120 °C for 12 h lose the peak at 1380 cm−1. In addition, the absorption peak at 2965 cm−1 corresponding to stretching vibration of –CH3 groups also disappeared or became weaker due to decomposition of the –CH3 groups [43].

Variations in the specific surface area and pore volume of the composite aerogels with different solvothermal crystallization time, before and after heat-treatment at 500 °C are shown in Fig. 8. It is found that the solvothermal crystallization and heat-treatment process have a significant impact on the specific surface area and pore volume of the composite aerogels. During the solvothermal crystallization, the hydrolysis of BC will occur with formation of short chains of glucose. In the case of the composite aerogels with solvothermal crystallization at 120 °C, the composite aerogels obtained with solvothermal crystallization for 0.5 h have the largest specific surface area and pore volume. With the increase of solvothermal temperature and time, the extent of hydrolysis of BC will increase, which will lead to a decrease in specific surface area and pore volume. The composite aerogels with solvothermal crystallization at 120 °C for 0.5 h had the lowest hydrolysis extent of BC, thus highly porous composite aerogels with higher pore volume and specific surface area could be obtained owing to the function of BC as a pore-expanding agent. After heat-treatment, the composite aerogels with solvothermal crystallization at 120 °C have an obvious decrease in the pore volume, with the exception of the composite aerogel with solvothermal crystallization at 120 °C for 3 h. During heat-treatment, the thermal decomposition of intermediate products of BC such as polysaccharide and glucose will occur, and the resulting H2O and Si–OH groups will lead to the formation of Van der Waals bonds and capillary forces between the SiO2 particles, which will cause polymerization of the gel and decrease the pore volume.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Variations in the specific surface area a and pore volume b of the composite aerogels with different solvothermal crystallization temperature before and after heat-treatment

In the case of the composite aerogels with solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C, the composite aerogels obtained with solvothermal crystallization for 3 h have the largest specific surface area and pore volume. This is attributed to a strengthening of the composite gel network during solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C for 3 h, leading to highly porous composite aerogels after surface modification and ambient pressure drying. With the increase of solvothermal crystallization time at 180 °C, the amount of W0.02TiO2.06 particles deposited increased, which will lead to the decrease of pore volume. In addition, with the increase of solvothermal time at 180 °C, the composite gel network may become more compact, which will not be favorable for the following surface modification, and thus the pore volume would be expected to decrease. After heat-treatment, the composite aerogels with solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C for 2–6 h have an obvious increase in the pore volume. This is attributed to combustion of the residual organic groups after surface modification. Moreover, in this work, preparation of SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels without solvothermal crystallization was also conducted. However, it was found that the composite wet gels shrink significantly after surface modification without the solvothermal crystallization process and it was impossible to obtain a porous aerogel. This result is presumably due to the interactive polymerization between the undecomposed BC molecules, which would be expected to promote densification of the network with associated loss of porosity.

Figure 9 shows the adsorption/photocatalytic degradation and the corresponding adsorption kinetic rate curves of the composite aerogels prepared under different solvothermal conditions. As is shown in Fig. 9a, b, when the solvothermal crystallization time is less than 2 h, the adsorption of the composite aerogels plays an important role in removing the RhB from water due to its higher specific surface area and pore volume. It was found that the composite aerogels prepared using solvothermal time less than 2 h achieved adsorption equilibrium and surface saturation within 60 min, which is similar to the results previously reported for the adsorption of RhB on SiO2 microsphere/graphene oxide composites [44]. As for the other composite aerogels with solvothermal processing times for more than 2 h, the adsorption saturation seems to occur more slowly, which may be ascribed to the slower diffusion of RhB molecules owing to the decreased pore volume and pore diameter. It would be expected that the composite aerogels processed with shorter solvothermal crystallization times would have a lower amount of W0.02TiO2.06 nanoparticles deposited in the network structure, and with the increase of solvothermal crystallization time, the maximum adsorption efficiency would hence decrease owing to the decreased pore volume.

Fig. 9
figure 9

a and b The adsorption/photocatalytic degradation curves; and c and d the corresponding adsorption kinetic rate curves of the composite aerogels with solvothermal crystallization at different temperature for different time

Furthermore, owing to the lower band gap of the composite aerogels compared to P25, the formation of e/h+ pairs can be excited by irradiation in the visible region. Thus, the composite aerogels should have better photocatalytic activity under the irradiation of visible light than P25. Although the photocatalytic activity in Fig. 9a, b does not appear to be as prominent as the adsorption, this may be ascribed to the lower amount of the residual RhB in the solution after adsorption.

It is found that the sample P25 also shows some photocatalytic activity under visible light irradiation, which may be ascribed to the RhB dye sensitization [45]. This result indicates that RhB dye sensitization may exist in the photocatalytic activity of the composite aerogels. In fact, relative comparison of pure redox forces in another visible light photocatalytic materials requires considering the effect of dye sensitization. As is shown in Fig. 9a, b, the composite aerogels can adsorb more RhB owing to its high pore volume and specific surface area than P25. Thus, the high adsorption efficiency of RhB in the composite aerogels are favorable for improving the dye sensitization, which is conducive to further improving the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of RhB. Hence, the synergistic effect of adsorption/photocatalytic degradation of RhB in the composite aerogels are more prominent. Therefore, the higher adsorption capacity and dye sensitization can achieve higher synergistic effect and jointly improve the efficiency of the composite aerogels for removing harmful RhB dye. In our next research, we will pay more attention to the dye sensitization and its effect on the photocatalytic activity of the composite aerogels.

Figure 9c, d show the adsorption kinetic rate curves for the composite aerogels. The adsorption has been carried out in the darkroom environment for 60 min. The adsorption performance for RhB of the composite aerogels decreases with increasing solvothermal crystallization time, whether the crystallization temperature is 120 or 180 °C. As is well known, the adsorption performance is related to the pore volume and specific surface area of the composite aerogels. With the increase of solvothermal crystallization time, the deposited W0.02TiO2.06 amount increases gradually, which will decrease the pore volume of the composite aerogels to some extent. However, all composite aerogels exhibit higher adsorptivity owing to their higher pore volumes and specific surface areas, which can promote relatively fast and efficient removal of pollutants in the environment.

The effects of BC and solvothermal conditions on the pore characteristics and adsorption/photocatalytic efficiency of SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels are shown in Table 2. It can be seen that SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels with pore volume Vporeå 0.5 cm3/g cannot be obtained without solvothermal treatment from BC-SiO2 composite gels, and accordingly exhibit little adsorption/photocatalytic activity. In contrast, the composite aerogels synthesized with solvothermal crystallization from pure SiO2 gels, despite the lack of BC, have higher adsorption/photocatalytic efficiency than that obtained without solvothermal crystallization, which indicates that the solvothermal crystallization plays an important role in enhancing the adsorption and photocatalytic activity. Moreover, the composite aerogel samples synthesized from BC-SiO2 composite gels with solvothermal crystallization have apparently improved adsorption/photocatalytic efficiency. In particular, under appropriate solvothermal temperature and time, SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels with high adsorption/photocatalytic efficiency can be obtained.

Table 2 The effects of BC and solvothermal condition on the properties of SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels

In order to highlight the higher efficiency of the composite aerogels for RhB decomposition, the characteristics of the P25-TiO2 powders were also listed in Table 2. It is found that the P25-TiO2 exhibits much lower specific surface area and adsorption rate than the composite aerogels. The adsorption rate within 60 min and the total adsorption/photocatalytic efficiency of the P25-TiO2 sample for Rhodamine B after 210 min was only 11.8% and 65.6%, respectively. In contrast, the as-prepared composite aerogels from BC-SiO2 gel exhibited higher total adsorption/photocatalytic efficiency with 92.9–96.2%. In particular, the adsorption rate of the composite aerogels is much higher than that of the P25-TiO2 sample. Despite the higher photocatalytic activity of P25-TiO2, the total adsorption/photocatalytic efficiency of composite aerogels is higher than that of the P25-TiO2 sample. It is evident that the higher adsorption rate and removing efficiency of RhB of the composite aerogels is attributed to its higher pore volume and specific surface area. Moreover, the synergistic action of adsorption and photocatalysis of the composite aerogels may also help to achieve higher removing efficiency of RhB pollutants. The higher removing efficiency of RhB indicates that the as-prepared composited aerogels in this work have broad application prospects in the field of environmental purification.

Figure 10a, b shows the XRD patterns of the three samples of composite aerogels prepared via solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C for either 1 or 3 h (i.e., three samples at each time point). It is evident that the reproducibility of the sample preparation is excellent, with the slight differences in the intensity of the respective diffraction patterns being ascribed to minor inhomogeneity within the samples. Similarly, BET analysis results indicate that a deviation of less than ±0.15 cm3/g of pore volume occurs in the repeat samples.

Fig. 10
figure 10

The XRD (a–b) and adsorption/photocatalysis (c–d) of the composite aerogels prepared repeatedly under the same experimental conditions

Figure 10c, d shows the adsorption/photocatalytic degradation curves of the two sets of triplicate samples. It can be observed that the respective triplicate samples all exhibit comparable high efficiency for removing RhB. The adsorption rate within 60 min and the total adsorption/photocatalytic efficiency for Rhodamine B after 210 min of the composite aerogel with solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C for 1 h is about 64 ± 3% and 85 ± 2%, respectively. This result indicates that the preparation process in this work is essentially reproducible.

In addition, in order to clarify the synergistic action of adsorption and photocatalysis of the composite aerogels, the adsorption/photocatalysis curves for a sample prepared without solvothermal crystallization and a sample prepared by mechanical mixing of SiO2 aerogel with W0.02TiO2.06 particles are also illustrated in Fig. 10. It can be observed that the sample prepared by mechanical mixing exhibited almost no photocatalytic activity after the initial adsorption process, while the composite aerogel sample obtained without solvothermal crystallization even exhibits some desorption after the initial adsorption in the dark. This result indicates that the as-prepared composite aerogels in this work showed higher synergistic action of adsorption and photocatalytic activity, even though the SEM and TEM images show a random TiO2 and WO3 distribution in the SiO2 network.

Furthermore, the photolysis curve of a catalyst-free RhB solution under irradiation is also illustrated in Fig. 10. It can be observed that almost no photolysis occurred under such conditions. This result further demonstrates that the as-prepared composite aerogels have good adsorption/photocatalytic properties.

Figure 11 shows the recycling results of the adsorption/photocatalysis of the composite aerogels after heat-treatment at 500 °C with solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C for 3 h. During the recycling tests, the adsorption/photocatalytic degradation for RhB was carried out simultaneously under irradiation using a metal halide lamp for 60 min. As is shown in Fig. 11, all the recycled composite aerogels exhibit high adsorption/photocatalytic degradation capability for RhB. In the first test, the composite aerogels exhibit the best adsorption/photocatalytic degradation performance, with 74% of the RhB removed. After the composite aerogels were separated from solution and dried, the corresponding performance decreased from 74 to 59–63% removal of RhB in subsequent recycling experiments, the performance stabilized at 63% degradation of RhB. The pores of the wet composite aerogel are initially filled with n-hexane, which has a lower surface tension than the aqueous solutions introduced during the first cycle, potentially leading to a decrease in the pore diameter and pore volume of the composite aerogel after the first cycle induced by capillary forces. As a result, the recycled composite aerogels would then be expected to have a slightly decreased adsorption/photocatalytic efficiency in the second and subsequent cycles. However, it would then be expected that the adsorption/photocatalytic efficiency of the composite aerogels for oily or gaseous pollutants would be more stable due to its nearly constant pore volume characteristic after each cycle.

Fig. 11
figure 11

The recycle results for the composite aerogels after heat-treatment at 500 °C for 2 h with initial solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C for 3 h (the specific surface area and pore volume were measured to be 416 m2/g and 2.76 cm3/g, respectively)

4 Conclusions

Solvothermal crystallization processes controlled by BC is an effective method for synthesizing SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels with improved TiO2 crystallization and pore volume characteristics via ambient pressure drying. The solvothermal crystallization temperature and time have a significant impact on the porosity characteristics and crystallinity of the composite aerogels. The composite aerogels with solvothermal crystallization at 120 °C for 0.5 h and 180 °C for 3 h exhibited the highest specific surface areas (416–729 m2/g) and pore volumes (2.26–2.70 cm3/g). With an increase of solvothermal crystallization temperature, the crystallinity of composite aerogels increased gradually. It was demonstrated that the SiO2-W0.02TiO2.06 composite aerogels exhibited higher adsorption and degradation efficiency for RhB than the commercial P25-TiO2, which was ascribed to the higher pore volume and specific surface area of the composite aerogels, as well as the synergistic action of adsorption and photocatalysis. Furthermore, the composite aerogel obtained with solvothermal crystallization at 180 °C for 3 h could be easily recycled many times, with the removing efficiency for RhB in the first test being 73% and stabilizing at 59–63% in the second to fourth recycling tests.