1 Introduction

With the excellent properties, gold has wide applications in various industrial fields such as electronic materials, catalysts, biomedicine, etc. [1,2,3]. However, the demand of gold is growing and gold resources are reducing. It is extremely important to remove and recycle gold from the primary and secondary resources.

Several methods have been employed to recycle gold from industry waste, for example, precipitation, electrolysis, solvent extraction, adsorption, and membrane technique [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Among these methods, adsorption is regarded as an efficient approach in both economy and technology, due to easy operating, suitable for low concentration of metal ions, low cost, and saving time. So there are a wide variety of adsorbents, such as resins [11,12,13], zeolite [14], molecular-imprinted biosorbent [15], chitosan resin [16], and magnetic particles [17, 18].

Recently, nano-materials have been developed as efficient adsorbents because of its excellent physiochemical performance that cannot be achieved by bulk materials [19]. As a nano-adsorbent, nano-silica has some unique superiority in the removal and recovery of metal ions [20], such as lead [21], copper [22], mercury [23], cadmium, and nickel [24].

In this study, 4-(aminomethyl) pyridine (AMPD) was modified on the surface of nano-silica for adsorption and recovery of Au(III). The new adsorbent was characterized by Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The effect of pH values, initial Au(III) concentration and reaction time on the adsorption capacity of Au(III) was assessed. The isotherms and kinetics parameters of adsorption experiments were calculated. The reusability and adsorption mechanism of the adsorbent were investigated. In addition, selective adsorption of gold from dualistic solution was also studied.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

Silica nanoparticles (SNP, Hydrophilic-380, 99.8%), glycidyl methacrylate (97%), 3-Chloropropyltriethoxysilane (CPTS, 98%), AMPD 98%, and Chloroauric acid hydrate (HAuCl4·4H2O, 99.95%) were purchased from Aladdin Chemistry Co. Ltd, N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF, 99.5%), Cuprous chloride (99.95%), 4,4-Bipyridine (98%), ethanol (99.8%), ammonia (99.5%), thiourea (99%), ZnCl2 (98%), PbCl2 (98%), MgCl2 (99%), CuCl2 (99.9%), and HNO3 (99.5%) were purchased from Tianjin Rgent Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. The pH of the solution was adjusted with HCl (99.5%) and NaOH (99%).

2.2 Preparation of AMPD-SNP

The new adsorbent was prepared by grafting AMPD on the surface of SNP (Scheme 1). Firstly, the halogenated hydrocarbons (C–Cl) were grafted on the surface of SNP via silanization. We added 5.0 g of SNP, 15 mL of CPTS, 4 mL of ammonia, and 80 mL of ethanol (ratio was 1:20) into a 100 mL three-necked flask. The mixture was stirred and refluxed at 340 K for 24 h. After centrifuged, the solid was washed with ethanol for five times and then dried in a vacuum oven at 355 K for 6 h, defined as CPTS-SNP. Secondly, the epoxy groups were grafted on the CPTS-SNP via atom transfer radical addition polymerization [25]. CPTS-SNP (2 g) and glycidyl methacrylate (10 mL) were dissolved in 80 mL of DMF, 30 mg of CuCl and 90 mg of 4,4-Bipyridine were added as the catalyst. After stirred and refluxed under N2 for 24 h at 345 K, the mixture was centrifuged and washed with DMF for five times, dried in a vacuum oven at 355 K for 6 h and obtained GMC-SNP. Finally, AMPD was grafted via ring opening reaction of epoxy groups. 1.65 g of GMC-SNP and 4 mL of AMPD were added into 80 mL of ethanol. After stirred and refluxed at 345 K for 24 h, the precipitate was centrifuged and washed with ethanol for five times, dried in a vacuum oven at 355 K for 6 h, and then we denoted it as AMPD-SNP.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Procedure for the preparation of AMPD-SNP

2.3 Batch adsorption experiment

The batch adsorption of Au(III) onto AMPD-SNP was carried out at room temperature. Twenty milligram of AMPD-SNP were added into 10 mL of aqueous solution containing a certain gold ions concentration. We shook it at 300 r.p.m., centrifuged the suspension at 8000 r.p.m. for 2 min. The remaining concentration of metal ions in the supernatant solution was determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. The adsorption efficiency (R%) and equilibrium adsorption capacity (q e mg/g) of Au(III) were calculated by the following Eq. 1 and Eq. 2, respectively:

$$R = \frac{{\left( {{C_0} - {C_e}} \right)}}{{{C_0}}} \times 100\%$$
(1)
$${q_e} = \frac{{\left( {{C_0} - {C_e}} \right)}}{m}V$$
(2)

where C 0 (mg/L) and C e (mg/L) are the initial and remaining concentrations of Au(III) in the testing solution, respectively. V (L) is the volume of the testing solution and m (mg) is the weight of AMPD-SNP.

2.4 Characterization

FT-IR was obtained by a Nicolet iS50 FT-IR spectrophotometer (Thermo Nicolet, USA) with a resolution of 4 cm−1. XPS was tested with a PHI5000 Versaprobe-II (Physical Electronics, Inc., Chanhassen, MN, USA) using 200 W Mg radiations. TEM (JEM-3200) was used to characterize the size and morphology of nano-silica. TGA measurements were carried out on PerkinElmer TGA-7 (America) thermogravimetric analyzer at a heating rate of 20℃/min. BET (surface area and porosimetry analyzer) specific surface area was tested by Micromeritics, ASAP 2020 surface and pore analyzer. The concentrations of Au(III), Pb(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), and Mg(II) were determined with inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES, LEEMAN prodigy 7, America).

2.5 Adsorption isotherms and kinetic studies

Adsorption isotherms and kinetic were studied by using different models. The Freundlich isotherm model has a wide range of applicability and a simple formulation. It has high practical value in some fields and is applied to adsorption of gas or solute on solid surface. The linear form of the Freundlich isotherm is given as Eq. 3:

$$\lg {q_e} = \lg {K_F} + \frac{1}{n}\lg {C_e}$$
(3)

where q e (mg/g) is the adsorption capacity of Au(III) at equilibrium, C e (mg/L) is the equilibrium concentration of Au(III) in solution, K F is a constant relevant to the adsorption capacity and n is the constant indicative of the intensity of the adsorption.

The Langmuir adsorption process is monolayer adsorption, and the linear form of the Langmuir isotherm is expressed as Eq. 4:

$$\frac{1}{{{q_e}}} = \frac{1}{{{q_m}}} + \frac{1}{{{K_L}{q_m}}} \bullet \frac{1}{{{C_e}}}$$
(4)

where q m (mg/g) is the maximum adsorption capacity and K L is the Langmuir binding constant relevant to energy of adsorption.

In the Temkin isothermal condition, the heat of adsorption is linearly reduced between the adsorbate and the adsorbent. The linear form of the Temkin isotherm is written as Eq. 5:

$${q_e} = {B_T}ln\,{K_T} + {B_T}ln\,{C_e}$$
(5)

where B T is relevant to the heat of adsorption, K T is the equilibrium binding constant (L/g).

The kinetics of Au(III) was analyzed using pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order and intraparticle diffusion kinetic models. Those can be expressed as the Eqs 6, 7, and 8, respectively:

$$ln\left( {{q_e} - {q_t}} \right) = ln\,{q_e} - {K_1}t$$
(6)
$$\frac{t}{{{q_t}}} = \frac{t}{{{q_e}}} + \frac{1}{{{K_2}{q_e}^2}}$$
(7)
$${q_t} = {K_i}{t^{1/2}} + C$$
(8)

where q t (mg/g) and q e (mg/g) were the amounts of Au(III) adsorbed per gram adsorbent at time t and at equilibrium, respectively. K 1 and K 2 (g/mg·min) were the rate constants of the pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order model. K i (mg/g·min1/2) was the rate constant of intraparticle diffusion model, C was an indicator for expressing the boundary layer thickness.

3 Result and discussion

3.1 Characterization of the sorbents

The FT-IR spectra of the nano-silica modified with organics were shown in Fig. 1. The peaks at 1102 and 3425 cm−1 belong to Si–O–Si and O–H stretching vibration (Fig. 1a) [26]. When CPTS was grafted on the surface of nano-silica, the peaks at 800, 1102, 2868, and 3425 cm−1 belong to C–Cl, Si–O–Si, –CH2, and O–H stretching vibration (Fig. 1b) [27]. After modified by glycidyl methacrylate, the vibration peak of epoxy group and C–C=O were locating at 1250 and 1680 cm−1 (Fig. 1c) [27, 28]. The new vibration peaks of C–OH, pyridine ring and –NH appeared in 1150, 1500, and 2954 cm−1 after modified by AMPD, respectively (Fig. 1d) [28].

Fig. 1
figure 1

FT-IR spectra of SNP (a), CPTS-SNP (b), GMC-SNP (c), and AMPD-SNP (d)

Figure 2 showed the TGA of SNP, CPTS-SNP, GMC-SNP, and AMPD-SNP. The mass losses of them were 8, 11, 15, and 22% in the temperature range of 20 to 1000°C, respectively. In the TGA, mass loss was caused by the decomposition of organic matter and the evaporation of water. From Fig. 2, we could determine that the amount of the CPTS, the glycidyl methacrylate and the AMPD were 3, 4, and 7%, respectively.

Fig. 2
figure 2

TGA dates of SNP, CPTS-SNP, GMC-SNP, and AMPD-SNP

BET surface area of CPTS-SNP is 120 m2/g, and the calculated density of the CPTS groups is 4.5 × 1018 m−2. This indicated that CPTS has been successfully grafted onto the surface of nano-silica.

XPS is an effective means of analysis for validating the elemental composition of a compound. Figure 3 is the survey spectra for these samples. The characteristic peaks of Si2p, Si2s, O1s, and C1s were observed. After modified by AMPD, the nitrogen peak at 398.2 eV was observed in the spectrum. The C1s peaks of the modified nano-silica were shown in Fig. 4. The C1s peaks of CPTS-SNP appeared in 284.6 and 287.5 eV, due to the C–C and C–Cl bonds (Fig. 4a). In Fig. 4b, two new bonds of GMC-SNP were generated. The peaks of C–O–C and O=C–O bonds were locating at 285.4 and 287.9 eV, respectively. After modified with AMPD, the epoxy bond (C–O–C) was opened and three new bonds (C–O, C–N, and C=N) were generated (Fig. 4c). The C1s peaks of AMPD-SNP was divided into five species (C–C, C–O, C–N, C=N, O=C–O), locating at 284.6, 285.2, 285.8, 287.7, and 287.9 eV, respectively.

Fig. 3
figure 3

XPS spectra of SNP, CPTS-SNP, GMC-SNP, and AMPD-SNP

Fig. 4
figure 4

C1s of CPTS-SNP (a), GMC-SNP (b), and AMPD-SNP (c)

In order to explore the morphology and size, TEM is widely used in various fields, including material science and geological minerals [29, 30]. As shown in Fig. 5, the particles size of SNP and AMPD-SNP were both 22.3 ± 5 nm. The results of TEM showed the morphology and size of SNP and AMPD-SNP were not much changed.

Fig. 5
figure 5

TEM images of SNP (a) and AMPD-SNP (b)

3.2 Effect of pH

As one of the important factors affecting the adsorption of metal ions, the pH value of the solution can promote the depolymerization of the functional groups of the sorbent and adjust the electrostatic adsorption or complexation reaction [31]. For preventing formation of gold hydroxide precipitates when pH is too high, we investigated the effect of pH on the adsorption of Au(III) in the range of 0.5 to 8.0. 20 mg of AMPD-SNP was added to 10 mL of gold ion solution (100 mg/L). We shook it for 60 min at room temperature and got the remaining concentration of Au(III) by centrifugation. As shown in Fig. 6, the adsorption efficiency has been continuously improved, and then decreased with the increase of pH value when pH was greater than 4.0. At low pH values, the competition adsorption between Cl and AuCl4 affected the adsorption of Au(III) by AMPD-SNP [32]. With the increasing of pH value, the hydroxo-containing gold complex such as AuCl3(OH)– emerged in solution, resulting in a decrease of electrostatic attractions between the negatively charged Au(III) anions and the positively charged adsorption sites of AMPD-SNP [33, 34]. Thus the optimum pH is 4.0.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of solution pH on the removal rate of Au(III)

3.3 Effect of initial Au(III) concentration and adsorption isotherms

In order to study the effect of the initial concentration of Au(III) on the adsorption capacity, we added 20 mg of AMPD-SNP to 10 mL of gold ion solution containing the following concentrations (80, 90, 100, 110, 120, 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 mg/L) at pH 4.0. As shown in Fig. 7, the adsorption capacity of Au(III) increased with the increase of the Au(III) concentration. The maximum adsorption capacity of Au(III) is 55.5 mg/g, because there is a strong interaction between the metal ions with the nitrogen lone-pair on the surface of AMPD-SNP adsorbent [35].

Fig. 7
figure 7

Effect of initial Au(III) concentration on the adsorption of Au(III)

The adsorption isotherm shows how the adsorbent interacts with the gold ion, and how the adsorption capacity varies with the adsorption concentration [22]. We presented the adsorption capacity of Au(III) and equilibrium concentration by Freundlich, Langmuir, and Temkin isotherm models at pH 4.0 and room temperature. [36, 37]

From Fig. 8a, lgC e vs. lgq e was drew by the values of Freundlich model. K F, R 2 and n were presented in Table 1. The R 2 coefficient is only 0.9025 and the n value is 2.2999, suggesting these data do not conform to the Freundlich isotherm model.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Adsorption isotherms of Au(III) onto AMPD-SNP, Freundlich (a), Langmuir (b), and Temkin (c)

Table 1 Isotherm parameters for the adsorption of Au(III) by the AMPD-SNP at 298 K

q m and K L were gained from Fig. 8b and shown in Table 1. The correlation coefficient (R 2) of Langmuir isotherm model was 0.9992, indicating the adsorption of Au(III) were fitted particularly well with the Langmuir isotherm model. The adsorption mechanism was verified by the high K L.

As shown in Fig. 8c, the values of Temkin model were used to draw InC e vs. q e , K T and B T had been calculated and presented in Table 1. The correlation coefficient (R 2) was only 0.9745, thus the experimental data did not follow the Temkin isothermal model.

The maximum adsorption capacity was 55.5 mg/g and monolayer adsorption happened on the nano-silica grafted with AMPD. The AMPD-SNP is an efficient sorbent. The adsorption capacity of AMPD-SNP and other results reported in literature were listed in Table 2. So the AMPD-SNP sorbent shows great potential in the field of adsorption and recycling of Au(III).

Table 2 Comparison of adsorption capacity of gold with sorbents reported in literature

3.4 Effect of reaction time and adsorption kinetics

In order to study the effect of reaction time on the adsorption by AMPD-SNP, we added 20 mg of AMPD-SNP to 10 mL of Au(III) solution (100 mg/L of initial concentration) at pH 4.0 and room temperature. As shown in Fig. 9, the adsorption rate of Au(III) was fast during the first 10 min. It took only 30 min to reach adsorption equilibrium. Chelation and ion exchange were the main mechanisms in the adsorption process.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Effect of contact time on the removal rate of Au(III)

For further study the adsorption mechanism, the Lagergren pseudo-first order, pseudo-second order, and intraparticle diffusion kinetic models were used to describe the adsorption kinetics of Au(III).

Kinetics parameters K and correlation coefficients R 2 were calculated and gathered in Table 3. The R 2 of the pseudo-first-order model was 0.9216, so it is difficult to fulfill the adsorption principle of this experiment (Fig. 10a). According to the intraparticle diffusion model, if the line plotted by q t vs. t 1/2 is straight and through the origin, the intraparticle diffusion is controlling step [38]. As shown in Fig. 10c, we found that the fitted straight lines did not pass through the origin and the R 2 was only 0.9604. Thus, the intraparticle diffusion was not suitable for describing adsorption kinetics. From Fig. 10b, the correlation coefficients (R 2) was 0.9998, indicating that the pseudo-second-order model was fitting well the adsorption kinetics of Au(III) using AMPD-SNP.

Table 3 Kinetics parameters for the adsorption of Au(III) by AMPDT-SNP
Fig. 10
figure 10

Adsorption kinetics of Au(III) onto AMPD-SNP, Pseudo-first-order (a), pseudo-second-order (b), and intraparticle diffusion models (c)

3.5 Desorption and reusability of AMPD-SNP

100 mg of AMPD-SNP was added to 50 mL of Au(III) solution (the initial concentration was 100 mg/L). After shook for 60 min, the mixed solution was centrifuged, and then we took the supernatant. An eluent consisting of thiourea (0.1 M) and HNO3 (3wt%) was used to retreat the AMPD-SNP adsorbent. Lastly, we regained the AMPD-SNP sorbent. The change of the adsorption efficiency was described in Fig. 11. After five successive cycles, the adsorption efficiency was reduced slightly from 71.25 to 69.01%. This proved that AMPD-SNP had good stability and high efficiency for the repeated use after five cycles.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Reusability of adsorbent for removal of Au(III) after five successive cycles of adsorption/desorption

3.6 Adsorption mechanism of Au(III) onto AMPD-SNP

To clarify the adsorption mechanism of Au(III) onto AMPD-SNP, XPS of the adsorbent before and after the adsorption of Au(III) were conducted. From Fig. 12a, the N1s spectrum of AMPD-SNP could be fitted into three peaks (C=N, –NH/–NH2, –NH2 +), locating at 398.5, 399.4, and 400.5 eV, respectively. After adsorbed the gold ions, the binding energy of some –NH/–NH2 groups reached at 400.4 eV, suggesting that the amino group has bound to Au(III) ions by chelation. At the same time, the peak of –NH2 + was broadened, indicating that many amino groups had been protonated (Fig. 12b). This was the premise of ion exchange with gold ions. As shown in Fig. 12c, the binding energy of Au4f was roughly locating at 83.0 and 89.1 eV in AMPD-SNP-Au. It was much lower than that in Au(III), showing that Au(III) had accepted electrons during adsorption process [39]. From the above results, we verified that the adsorption mechanism was the chelation and ion exchange reaction between Au(III) and amines/hydroxyl groups (Scheme 2). On one hand, the amines and hydroxyl groups of the surface of adsorbent reacted with AuCl4 by direct chelation, on the other hand, the amino group was protonated by hydrochloric acid at first, and then adsorbed gold ions by ion exchange [39]. Sun et al. have also suggested that the mechanism of adsorption of gold ions is the reaction between gold ions and amines and hydroxyl groups [40].

Fig. 12
figure 12

N1s of AMPD-SNP (a) and AMPD-SNP-Au (b), and Au4f of AMPD-SNP-Au (c)

Scheme 2
scheme 2

Mechanism of the adsorption of Au(III) onto AMPD-SNP

3.7 Selective adsorption of Au(III) onto AMPD-SNP

Selective adsorption of Au(III) from dualistic solution by the AMPD-SNP was studied at pH 4.0 and with other conditions fixed. The solution contained Pb(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), and Mg(II), respectively. Twenty milligram of AMPD-SNP was added into 10 mL of dualistic solutions containing Au(III) (100 mg/L) and coexisting metal ions (100 mg/L), and then shook it for 60 min at room temperature. After centrifugation, the remaining concentrations of gold ions and coexisting metal ions were detected. From Table 4, we found that the adsorption efficiency of the coexisting ions were much less than Au(III). The reason was that the binding ability between Au(III) and amino were much stronger than other metal ions,. The results indicated that Au(III) can be selectively adsorbed by AMPD-SNP from the mixed solution.

Table 4 Selective adsorption of Au(III) form the coexisting metal ions by AMPD-SNP

4 Conclusions

In this study, a new adsorbent for Au(III) was successfully synthesized by grafting with AMPD on nano-materials. FT-IR, TGA, XPS, TEM, and BET were used to characterize the adsorbent. The effects of solution pH, contact time, and initial Au(III) concentration on the adsorption of Au(III) have been studied. The optimum pH for the recovery of Au(III) was 4.0. The maximum uptake of Au(III) was 55.5 mg/g at pH 4.0 and room temperature. The adsorption equilibrium was reached at 30 min and the adsorption mechanism was the complexation and ion exchange reaction between Au(III) and amino functional groups. The adsorption of Au(III) by AMPD-SNP fitted well with the Langmuir isotherm model and also followed the pseudo second-order kinetics. AMPD-SNP had excellent reusability after several cycles and exhibited high selectivity to Au(III). Thus AMPD functionalized SNPs could be of great potential as novel adsorbent for the selective recovery of Au(III) from wastewater.