Abstract
Changes in the visual characteristics of uranium oxide surfaces and morphology following storage under different conditions of temperature and relative humidity may provide insight into the history of an unknown sample. Sub-samples of three α-U3O8 materials—one that was phase-pure and two that were phase-impure—were stored under controlled conditions for two years. Scanning electron microscopy was used to image the oxides before and after storage, and a morphology lexicon was used to characterize the images. Temporal changes in morphology were observed in some sub-samples, and changes were greatest following exposure to high relative humidity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Temporal changes in the morphology of uranium oxide materials could provide insight into process and/or storage history [1–5]. Process variables inherent in the synthesis of nuclear materials are known to influence the morphology of uranium oxide products [4, 6–15]. In particular, comparison of the morphology of precipitates with those of subsequent calcination products suggests that microstructures of the precursor precipitates are retained through heat treatment [6–8, 13–16]. A number of studies have shown that U3O8, a common intermediate in the production of nuclear material, generates schoepite phases (UO3·xH2O) during storage under higher relative humidities presumably following oxidation and/or hydration [2, 17–19]. It would be valuable to understand the variables contributing to temporally-induced morphology changes, and if any changes occur, the prospect for using the temporal changes in morphology that arise during storage under different conditions for forensic analyses.
The objective of this study is to characterize images of three α-U3O8 samples—one phase-pure α-U3O8 sample and two phase-impure U3O8 samples—prepared from reaction routes used in nuclear conversion processes. These images were collected using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Sub-samples of the materials were stored under controlled temperature and relative humidity conditions for 2 years. The chemical speciation of these materials and any chemical changes in the materials following storage were detailed previously [2]. The morphology of the materials are characterized using a lexicon of descriptors for assessing any temporal changes [20]. These results are compared with powder X-ray diffraction (p-XRD) patterns and Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (EXAFS) spectra [2].
Experimental
Materials
Uranium U960 Standard Reference Material obtained from the National Bureau of Standards was used in the synthesis of α-U3O8 [2]. Ammonium hydroxide (Trace Metal grade), concentrated hydrochloric acid (Trace Metal grade), hydrogen peroxide (A.C.S. certified, 30 %), and platinum foil (Alpha Aesar 00261) were purchased from Fisher Scientific and used as received. Lithium iodide and potassium nitrate were purchased from Fisher Scientific and used as received.
Syntheses
The preparation of α-U3O8 (S1) is described elsewhere [2, 16]. The phase purity was confirmed by p-XRD analysis. This material is a black powder. Legacy materials were retrieved from LANL stock of uranium oxides synthesized on a 10 g scale using reaction routes often used in nuclear fuel processes. Legacy sample 1 (L1) and legacy sample 2 (L2) were made from these reaction routes:
Both legacy samples are also black powders. The chemical speciation of L1 and L2 is detailed elsewhere [2].
Material storage under controlled temperature and relative humidity
Aging vessels fabricated from Swagelok fittings are described elsewhere [1, 2, 21]. The four storage conditions of temperature and relative humidity used in these experiments were: Condition 1 (5 °C and 25 %), Condition 2 (37 °C and 15 %), Condition 3 (5 °C and 97 %), and Condition 4 (37 °C and 89 %). These conditions are listed in Table 1 with respective water vapor densities. A saturated lithium iodide aqueous solution was used to obtain lower relative humidities. A saturated potassium nitrate aqueous solution was used to achieve higher relative humidities. Time 0 for S1 was the time at which the synthesis of the material was completed. Time 0 for L1 and L2 was the time at which each sample was retrieved from storage. Average conditions in our laboratory were 20 °C and ~20 % relative humidity.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Samples were prepared by dusting the surface of a carbon adhesive disc adhered to an SEM mount with uranium oxide material and then lightly tapping the loose particles away. Images of the samples were collected on an FEI Quanta 200F Field Emission SEM using accelerating voltages of 15–30 kV.
Lexicon
A lexicon was employed to describe the morphology of the materials. The lexicon provides a taxonomic path schematic for the description of particle/subparticle morphology including the surface textures and features observed in an SEM image [20]. Terminology from the lexicon is denoted by italic type face.
Results and discussion
Phase-pure α-U3O8
Images of the phase-pure α-U3O8 (S1) were collected and assessed to benchmark temporal changes in legacy materials L1 and L2. The S1 was prepared by calcination of UO2(O2)·xH2O as described in references [2] and [16], and the p-XRD analysis of S1 revealed that it was phase-pure α-U3O8. An image collected from S1 is presented in Fig. 1. We found the lexicon useful for describing the morphology of the materials. Freshly-prepared S1 is characterized as having clumped/massive agglomerates composed of sub-particles having a rounded/sub-rounded habit of semi-rounded grains arranged in irregular clumps that are somewhat rough and have a similar appearance as the solution-grown UO2(O2)·xH2O (see Table 2) (vide supra). The sub-particles in this image are >0.5 μm, but an image of α-U3O8 from a replicate synthesis showed the same morphology in sub-particles that were <0.5 μm [16]. Comparison of the images of the precursor UO2(O2)·xH2O with those of S1 indicated that morphology was maintained following calcination of the uranyl peroxide precipitate to the uranium oxide product. Further work should be carried out to determine if the particulate size of the precursor is carried over into the calcination product, as well.
Sub-samples of S1 were stored under Conditions 1 through 4 for 2 years after which time images were collected by SEM and characterized using the lexicon (See Table 2) [22]. The SEM images of the aged materials are given in Fig. 1. These images of material stored under lower relative humidity (Conditions 1 and 2) do not reveal apparent changes in morphology. Little change in chemical speciation of S1 was measured by p-XRD or EXAFS, either [2]. However, storage of S1 under higher relative humidity (Conditions 3 and 4) resulted in an apparent flattening of the habit to an eroded surface appearance (Condition 3) or eroded or dissolved surface appearance (Condition 4) (See Table 2). Likewise, the p-XRD patterns of S1 stored under high relative humidity (Conditions 3 and 4) showed the presence of both α-U3O8 and schoepite-like species (UO3·xH2O), likely due to oxidation and hydration of the initial material [2]. The larger size of the particles in S1 following storage under Condition 4 is likely due to significant absorption of water. These results are further supported by the EXAFS data which showed that S1 stored under Condition 4 exhibited the greatest degree of disorder in the local structure compared to material stored under the other conditions (Conditions 1–3.)
Legacy samples
Two legacy samples retrieved from LANL stock were selected for this study because these materials contained chemical impurities that potentially could be incorporated in uranium oxide materials prepared in nuclear processes. For example, the p-XRD pattern of L1 confirmed the presence of α-U3O8 and a measurable amount of [UO2F2(H2O)](H2O)0.571, which most likely was starting material that prevailed through the precipitation of ammonium diuranate and subsequent calcination to α-U3O8 [2]. The p-XRD pattern for L2 indicated the presence of α-U3O8 and a small quantity of schoepite phases, likely due to oxidation and hydration before the sample was retrieved from storage for study.
The SEM images of L1 and L2 at time 0 are given in Fig. 2, and the descriptors for L1 and L2 are provided in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. The SEM image of L1 reveals clumped/massive agglomerates with a rounded/sub-rounded mineral habit of granular, semi-rounded grains arranged in irregular clumps composed of particles of up to 5 μm diameter, but in comparison with S1, the particle surfaces are smooth with surface decorations of fines that are <0.5 μm diameter. Although these morphologic differences could be dependent upon chemical impurities, it is also possible that they are a result of the morphology of the precursor complex. No images of the precursor complexes were available for comparison, and so conclusive attributions cannot be assigned.
The descriptor for the SEM image of L2 is different from that for S1. The SEM image of L2 displayed clumped/massive agglomerates with irregular clumps of particles <0.5 μm diameter.
The images of L1 post-storage reveal changes in morphology (See Fig. 3) and chemical speciation. Following storage for 2 years under the low relative humidity Condition 1, the morphology took on clumped/massive sub-particles in a bimodal distribution of rounded/sub-rounded habit of granular, semi-rounded grains of irregular and smooth particles. The material stored under Condition 2 appears to be a conglomerate of sub-rounded clumps with a somewhat rough surface. A sample of L1 was not stored under Condition 3. The most visible change was in the images of material stored under Condition 4, which is best described by a different description path through the lexicon [20]. The morphology appears to be a complex conglomerate that was a mixture of sub-angular/angular and other particles. One portion of the particles looks to have high sphericity flattened and blocky irregular plates, with a smooth surface, while the other portion consists of subhedral and bladed plates with a smooth surface. The initial uranyl fluoride impurity was not measurable by p-XRD analysis after 2 years, perhaps through decomposition to another chemical species or due to masking by more predominant lines.
Images of the L2 material after storage for 2 years under Conditions 1–4 are given in Fig. 4. Powder-XRD analysis of these materials all show the presence of α-U3O8 and UO3·xH2O phases, likely inter-grown metaschoepite and schoepite patterns that cannot be resolved [19]. It is not possible to determine if either the schoepite phases are redistributing between different schoepite phases without changing the ratio of UO3:H2O due to dissolution and precipitation during storage over this time, or progressing from one schoepite phase to another. Material stored under the lower temperature conditions (1 or 3) appears to be clumped/massive conglomerates of sub-rounded and irregular clumps that included fines and scale decorations (Condition 1) or a dissolved surface appearance (Condition 3). The material stored under Condition 2 is a massive agglomerate of irregular clumps with a somewhat rough surface. In contrast, the image of material stored under Condition 4 exhibits a massive conglomerate of irregular clumps with a somewhat rough surface containing pored surface indentations. The formation of this texture could have formed from rapid absorption followed by desorption of water [1, 2].
Image of S1, L1, and L2 reveal that changes in the morphology were particularly notable following storage under higher relative humidity and temperature (Condition 4). Although the same conditions were employed for storage of S1, L1, and L2 over 2 years, however, the changes in morphology of materials with impurities (L1 and L2) were more obvious than the changes in the morphology of phase-pure S1. It is possible that chemical impurities present in L1 and L2 at time 0 were responsible for the more significant changes in morphology. Research into uranium oxide materials has suggested that relatively minor shifts in localized environment affect the growth of crystals [23]. It also has been shown that doping more oxidized uranium oxides, such as U3O8, into UO2 powder influences grain size and packing during sintering [24, 25]. While not actinide systems, other studies of transition species in the Cd-I-Cu system have demonstrated that the impurities in copper compounds promote preferential growth directionality along surface planes, consistent with our results here, while other work has revealed the effect of chemical impurities on nucleation and growth of ettringite in a concrete environment. [26, 27]. Alternatively, materials L1 and L2 had already begun oxidation and hydration before they were removed from storage, which may have induced a more rapid change over this 2 year time period under high relative humidity.
Conclusions
An understanding of the potential for changes in morphology in uranium oxide materials over time and correlation of temporal changes in morphology with chemical speciation would be valuable for understanding the history of unknown analogues and/or evaluating morphology. Previous work to characterize U3O8 has shown that chemical signatures incorporated from a nuclear fuel process or produced following storage under controlled temperature and relative humidity over time may be measurable by p-XRD analysis. Additional characterization using p-XRD analysis and EXAFS spectroscopy has given a better understanding of the extent of oxidation and hydration in U3O8 following storage. Here, we collected images from the phase-pure material and two of the phase-impure materials from the previous study. The three materials were stored under different conditions of temperature and relative humidity over 2 years. The images of the phase-pure material showed little or no changes in morphology following storage under low relative humidity. While images of all materials revealed greater changes in morphology following storage under the higher relative humidity conditions, phase-impure materials yielded more discernable changes in mineral habit after storage for 2 years. These results suggest changes in surface area of the materials, which could provide another forensic signature of material storage history. Although these results do not elucidate these processes, these results suggest the need to conduct further studies to evaluate potential changes in morphology and particle sizes along with chemical speciation using uranium oxide materials with known quantities of impurities.
References
Wagner G, Kinkead S, Paffett M, Rector K, Scott B, Tamasi A, Wilkerson M (2015) Morphologic and chemical characterization of products from hydrolysis of UF6. J Fluorine Chem 178:107–114
Tamasi A, Boland K, Czerwinski K, Ellis J, Kozimor S, Martin R, Pugmire A, Reilly D, Scott B, Sutton A, Wagner G, Walensky J, Wilkerson M (2015) Oxidation and hydration of U3O8 materials following controlled exposure to temperature and humidity. Anal Chem 87:4210–4217
Mayer K (2013) Expand nuclear forensics. Nature 503:461–462
Mayer K, Wallenius M, Varga Z (2013) Nuclear forensic science: correlating measurable material parameters to the history of nuclear material. Chem Rev 113:884–900
Joint Working Group of the American Physical Society and the American Association for the Advancement of Science: Nuclear Forensics: Role, State of the Art, Program Needs. http://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/migrate/uploads/Nuclear_Forensics.pdf
Paik S, Biswas S, Bhattacharya S, Roy S (2013) Effect of ammonium nitrate on precipitation of ammonium di-uranate (ADU) and its characteristics. J Nucl Mater 440:34–38
Manna S, Roy S, Joshi J (2012) Study of crystallization and morphology of ammonium diuranate and uranium oxide. J Nucl Mater 424:94–100
Manna S, Karthik P, Mukherjee A, Banerjee J, Roy S, Joshi J (2012) Study of calcinations of ammonium diuranate at different temperatures. J Nucl Mater 426:229–232
Andreev E, Glavin K, Ivanov A, Malovik V, Martynov V, Panov V (2009) Some results uranium dioxide powder structure investigation. Russ J Non Ferrous Met 50:281–285
Marajofsky A, Perez L, Celora J (1991) On the dependence of characteristics of powders on the AUC process paramaters. J Nucl Mater 178:143–151
Pan Y-M, Ma C-B, Hsu N-N (1981) The conversion of UO2 via ammonium uranyl carbonate: study of precipitation, chemical variation and powder properties. J Nucl Mater 99:135–147
Woolfrey J (1978) The preparation of UO2 powder: effect of ammonium uranate properties. J Nucl Mater 74:123–131
Janov J, Alfredson P, Vilkaitis V (1972) The influence of precipitation conditions on the properties of ammonium diuranate and uranium dioxide powders. J Nucl Mater 44:161–174
Cordfunke E, van der Giessen A (1967) Particle properties and sintering behaviour of uranium dioxide. J Nucl Mater 24:141–149
Doi H, Ito T (1964) Significance of physical state of starting precipitate in growth of uranium dioxide particles. J Nucl Mater 11:94–106
Tamasi A, Cash L, Mullen W, Ross A, Ruggiero C, Scott B, Wagner G, Walensky J, Zerkle S, Wilkerson M (2015) Comparison of morphologies of a uranyl peroxide precursor and calcination products. J Radioanal Nucl Chem doi:10.1007/s10967-016-4692-x
He H, Wang P, Allred D, Majewski J, Wilkerson M, Rector K (2012) Characterization of chemical speciation in ultrathin uranium oxide layered films. Anal Chem 84:10380–10387
Lloyd N, Mosselmans J, Parrish R, Chenery S, Hainsworth S, Kemp S (2009) The morphologies and compositions of depleted uranium particles from an environmental case-study. Mineral Mag 73:495–510
Finch R, Hawthorne F, Ewing R (1998) Structural relations among schoepite, metaschoepite and “dehydrated schoepite”. Can Mineral 36:831–845
Tamasi A, Cash L, Eley C, Porter R, Pugmire D, Ross A, Ruggiero C, Tandon L, Wagner G, Walensky J, Wall A, Wilkerson M (2016) A lexicon for consistent description of material images for nuclear forensics. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 307:1611–1619
Anovitz L, Riciputi L, Cole D, Gruszkiewicz M, Elam J (2006) The effect of changes in relative humidity on the hydration rate of Pachuca obsidian. J Non-Cryst Solids 352:5652–5662
Wilkerson M, Kinman W, Kozimor S, Pugmire A, Scott B, Tamasi A, Wagner G, Walensky J (2014) Probing forensic signatures of nuclear materials. In: Proceedings in the IAEA international conference on advances in nuclear forensics (IAEA-CN-218) Vienna, Austria, 7–10 July 2014
Pradhan M, Sarkar S, Sinha A, Basu M, Pal T (2011) Morphology controlled uranium oxide hydroxide hydrate for catalysis, luminescence and SERS studies. Cryst Eng Comm 13:2878–2889
Petrov I, Basov V (2009) Investigation of the influence of the initial state of powder, pore-forming additions, and U3O8 on the microstructure and strength of fuel pellets. At Energ 107:85–88
Kang K, Yang J, Kim J, Rhee Y, Kim D, Kim K, Song K (2008) Improvement of UO2 pellet properties by controlling the powder morphology of recycled U3O8 powder. J Nucl Sci Technol 45:1150–1154
Ithnin R, Jones R (1996) CdI2 single-crystal growth on Cu(111): adsorption, desorption and formation of a chemisorbed CdI1 phase. J Phys: Condens Matter 8:3285–3295
Cody A, Lee H, Cody R, Spry P (2004) The effects of chemical environment on the nucleation, growth, and stability of ettringite [Ca3Al(OH)6]2(SO4)3·26H2O. Cem Concr Res 34:869–881
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, Transformational and Applied Research Directorate and National Technical Nuclear Forensics Center, under competitively awarded contracts IAA HSHQDC-13-X-00269 and under HDHQDC-08-X-00805. ALT gratefully acknowledges the U.S. Department of Homeland Security under Grant Award Number, 2012-DN-130-NF001-02, the Seaborg Institute, and the University of Missouri for providing funding to perform this work. J.R.W.’s contribution to this material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security under Grant Award Number, 2012-DN-130-NF001-02. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security or the Government. Los Alamos National Laboratory is operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC, for the National Nuclear Security Administration of U.S. Department of Energy (contract DE-AC52-06NA25396). The authors declare no competing financial interests. LA-UR-16-21674.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tamasi, A.L., Cash, L.J., Mullen, W.T. et al. Morphology of U3O8 materials following storage under controlled conditions of temperature and relative humidity. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 311, 35–42 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-016-4923-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-016-4923-1