Abstract
The present work aims to prepare biocomposites based on natural rubber reinforced with nanocrystalline and modified nanocrystalline cellulose as biodegradable fillers to strengthen natural rubber instead of traditional fillers, as well as evaluating the effect of adding them in different proportions on the rheological, mechanical and electrical properties. Acid hydrolysis process was used to prepare nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) from microcrystalline cellulose. Modification of nano-crystaline cellulose was achieved using cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide as a cationic surfactant. The prepared NCC and modified NCC were characterized through fourier transformed infrared spectra and X-ray diffraction. The biocomposites were prepared by incorporating modified and non-modified NCC as reinforcing fillers into natural rubber using two-roll mill mixer. The rheometric, physico-mechanical, electrical and thermo-oxidative properties were evaluated. Furthermore, the filler distribution in the prepared composites was investigated by scanning electron microscope.The mechanical results showed that the tensile strength increased gradually with increasing NCC and modified NCC till 5 phr and then declined with increasing filler content up to 10 phr. In contrast, the elongation at break values decreased with increasing the filler content. The NCC modification led to a noticeable decline in the curing time more than NCC, confirming that modified NCC could accelerate the curing process more than NCC without modification. Also, dielectric measurements showed that both permittivity ε′ and dielectric loss ε″ values increased by increasing filler loading in the composite. In addition to the NR/m-NCC composites exhibit higher values in both ε′ and ε″ than NR/ NCC composites.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Recently, preparation of biocomposites has gained considerable attention to exchange petrochemical materials due to the ecological awareness and the global request for green technology [1, 2]. Natural rubber (NR) is one of the most important renewable polymers according to its desired properties including high mechanical properties, high elasticity, flexibility and resilience. Natural rubber is used in many industrial application including gloves, rubber bands, tires and adhesives [3,4,5].
The natural rubber mechanical properties can be enhanced in different way such as using crosslinkers or addition of reinforcement fillers. Silica [6] and carbon black [7] are the most known reinforcing agents in the rubber manufacturing but the using of these fillers led to high energy consumption and ecological contamination. Consequently, developing eco-friendly fillers is a perfect option to overcome the drawbacks of traditional fillers. Natural fillers extracted from renewable sources can be utilized according to their desired characteristics as low cost, degradability and high mechanical properties [8,9,10,11].
Cellulose nanoparticles are the most common natural polymers and can be obtained from many natural sources including straws, cotton, corncob, peels, bagasse and etc. Many academic researches have verified that nanocellulose can be as reinforcing filler in numerous rubbers, as polyisoprene (natural rubber), nitrile butadiene rubber etc., [4, 12]. Micro and nanocrystalline cellulose are recommended by many researchers to be as green reinforcing fillers according to their remarkable characteristics as renewability, degradability and low cost [13, 14]. Moreover, NCC can be obtained through acid hydrolysis where the amorphous parts of the cellulose such as hemicellulose or lignin are removed [15, 16]. After acid hydrolysis process is completed the resultant NCC has a considerable amount of hydroxyl function groups on its surface which led to more agglomerate and consequently affect on mechanical properties of the composites. Also, several reports introduce methods to improve the dispersion of the nanocellulose in the polymeric matrix including surface modification or chemical grafting of NCC [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24].
In this manuscript, nanocrystalline cellulose and modified nanocrystalline cellulose were successfully prepared. The obtained NCC and m-NCC were characterized by FTIR spectra and x ray diffraction. The prepared NCC and m-NCC were used as reinforcing fillers in natural rubber biocomposites with different content. The rheometric characteristics, mechanical, thermal stability and electrical properties of prepared biocomposites were also evaluated.
Material and methods
Material
Microcrystalline cellulose was purchased from SDFCL Company. Hydrochloric acid (HCl) 34 wt.% was purchased from El-Nasser pharmaceutical chemical company (Egypt). Hexadecyl-trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was provided by Acros organics Company. Smoked sheets natural rubber (NR) provided by Transport and Engineering Company, Egypt with specific gravity 0.913 ± 0.005. All the rubber ingredients zinc oxide, stearic acid, dioctyl phthalate (DOP) and tetramethylthiuram disulfide (TMTD) were of commercial grades. N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazole sulfonamide (CBS), 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,2-dihydroquinoline (TMQ) and elemental sulfur were gained from Aldrich, Germany.
Preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose
Microcrystalline cellulose was mixed with 5 M of HCl in two neck flask. The mixture was then hydrolyzed at 100 °C for 1 h with continuous stirring. Until time is over, the mixture was placed in ice bath to quench the reaction. Then, washing the resultant mixture with distilled water and centrifuging the mixture for half hour at 3000 rpm. Washing and centrifuging process were repeated for five times. Then the washing process stops when the pH value reaches its neutralization equal 7. Then, prepared NCC was dried and stored at room temperature before analysis and using.
Modification of nanocrystalline cellulose
Fill three-necked flask with equal weight of prepared NCC as well as cationic surfactant (CTAB) at 60 °C for 3 h. After the reaction, the excess CTAB was removed by centrifugation at 4000 rpm/min for 3 min to obtain m-NCC. Modified NCC was dried and before using and analysis.
Preparation of NR/cellulose biocomposites
Nanocrystalline cellulose and modified nanocrystalline cellulose were incorporated into natural rubber as reinforcing filler using a laboratory two-roll mill. Rubber formulations are presented in Table 1. The composites were cured at 140 ± 1 °C using a moving die rheometer (MDR2000).
Characterizations
Fourier Transforms Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy
FT-IR spectra of modified and non-modified cellulose were measured at wavenumber range 4000–400 cm−1 with JASCO FTIR-6100E (Japan).
X-ray Diffraction (XRD)
The diffraction angles 2θ for micro, nano, and modified nanocrystalline cellulose were measured using Philip’s X-ray diffractometer PW1390 with Ni-filtered CuKα radiation (wave length of 1.5404 A°) at generator voltage and tube current of 40 KV and 30 A°. Also, the crystallinity was calculated by the following equation:
Scan Electron Microscope (SEM)
Morphology of NR, NR/NCC and NR/m-NCC were studied using Quanta scanning electron microscope (model FEG250, FEI, Hillsboro, Oregon, USA).
Mechanical and thermal oxidative ageing properties
The tensile test of the NR biocomposites was performed using Zwick tensile testing machine (model Z010, Germany), in accordance with ASTM D412. Also, thermal oxidative ageing was performed at 70 ± 1 °C in an oven for 1 week according to ASTM: D 572-04, 2010.
Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)
Thermal stability of NR biocomposites was studied using TA Instrument 2910 Series TGA at heating rate 10 °C/minute in nitrogen environment from ambient temperature up to 600 °C.
Dielectric properties of NR biocomposites
LCR meter type AG-411 B (Ando electric Ltd. Japan) was used to evaluate dielectric properties of NR biocomposites at the range of frequency 100 Hz till 100 kHz. The capacitance C, the resistance R and the loss tangent tan d were gained. The rubber composites were molded as discs with 5 cm diameter and 3 mm thickness. Germany ring capacitor (model NFM/5 T Wiss Tech. Werkstatten GMBH,) was service as a measuring cell. Standard materials were used to calibrate the cell, and the experimental errors in permittivity and dielectric loss were establish to be ± 3 and ± 5%, respectively.
Results and discussion
Nanocrystalline and modified nanocrystalline cellulose characterization
FTIR spectra of nanocrystalline obtained by acid hydrolysis and modified nanocrystalline cellulose with CTAB as cationic surfactant are shown in Fig. 1. It can be seen that from this figure, IR absorption bands for NCC appear at 3300, 2912 cm−1 according to the O–H and C–H stretching vibration respectively and absorption peak at 1380 due to C–H and C–O vibrations of polysaccharide [25]. Surface modification of nanocrystalline cellulose was confirmed by two peaks at 2930 and 2860 cm−1 related to CH2 stretches of asymmetrical and symmetrical alkyl chain of CTAB. As well as peak appears at 1450 cm−1 according to methyl group of cationic substituent [26].
X-ray Diffraction of microcrystalline, nanocrystalline and modified nanocrystalline cellulose are shown in Fig. 2. It is evident from this figure that there are three main peaks at 2θ = 14.75, 16.08 and 22.37 and these peaks are assigning for cellulose. Also, crystallinity was calculated according to Eq. 1 and was found to be 70.39, 78.20 and 68.77 for MCC, NCC and m-NCC respectively. The crystallinity increases from microcrystalline to nanocrystalline cellulose due to acid hydrolysis which can remove amorphous region such as hemicellulose or lignin. Also, modification of NCC with CTAB decrease the crystallinity and this is may be due to increase the amorphous region according to electrostatic interaction between two different charges [27].
NR biocomposites characterization
Rheological characteristic of NR biocomposites
Table 2 clarifies the rheological properties of the NR biocomposites, including maximum and minimum torques (MH and ML, respectively), scorch time (ts2), optimum cure time (Tc90), and cure rate index (CRI). From this table, It is clear that the MH and ML values for NR/mـNCC and NR/NCC composites are higher than those of the blank NR. In addition to, the MH and CRI values increase with increasing cellulosic filler content. Also, the optimum cure time (Tc90) of NR/NCC and NR/mـNCC composites with different content were shown in Fig. 3. It is evident from this figure that (Tc90) decreases with increasing filler content. Moreover, the modification of NCC leads to sharpe decrease in Tc90 more than composites containing NCC [4].
Mechanical properties of NR biocomposites
Figure 4a, b revealed the tensile strength and elongation at break of natural rubber composites with different content from NCC and m-NCC respectively. It is clear from this figure that, the mechanical properties of natural rubber were improved gradually with the addition of NCC content up to 5 phr and declined above this ratio. In contrast, the values of elongation at break decreased with increasing NCC content. Also, it can be notice that the addition of m-NCC led to a slight increase in tensile strength when compared to NR and NR/NCC composites, while achieved a noticeable increase in elongation at break which may possibly due to the modification step with CTAB as cationic surfactant. This behavior is parallel to that stated by many researchers [28,29,30,31].
Thermal oxidative ageing properties of NR biocomposites
Thermal oxidative ageing is a significant test for polymeric composites which can effect on the composites quality. The effect of adding NCC or mـNCC on thermal ageing resistance was evaluated through the variations in the tensile strength and elongation at break retained values respectively. Figure 5a, b illustrates the retained tensile strength and elongation at break values respectively during ageing periods for NR and NR containing 5phr NCC and mـNCC biocomposites. From this figure, the highest retained value of tensile strength was achieved by NR/5NCC (85.2%) then NR/5 m-NCC (82.5%) and finally NR (79.5%). While the highest retained value of elongation at break was achieved by NR/5 m-NCC (87.9%) then NR/5NCC (85.2%) and finally NR (81.2%). Overall, it can be state that the addition of both NCC and mـNCC to natural rubber enhance the thermal stability of the composites which will be convenient to the life of the end product.
Thermogravimetic analysis of NR biocomposites
The thermogravimetric curves of the NR, NR/5NCC and NR/5 m-NCC composites are shown in Fig. 6. All composites show same degradation behavior. TGA curve of NR biocomposites clarifies the thermal degradation of the composites in three steps. Firstly, the initial weight loss (up to 200 °C) attributed to removal of moisture and other volatile matter. Secondly, fast decomposition took place when temperature was within the range of 279–371 °C due to cellulose degradation and formation char residual. Finally, last weight loss happened around 371–519 °C and this is may be attributed to degradation natural rubber [32, 33].
Dielectric properties of NR biocomposites
Permittivity ε′ as a function of frequency at room temperature ~25 °C for NR/NCC and NR/m-NCC composites with different filler content is shown in Fig. 7. In both cases it is seen that the permittivity ε′ declines with increasing frequency. It is also seen from this figure that the decline in ε′ is very prominent at low frequencies. In most dielectric materials, the value of ε′ decreases with increasing applied frequency due to the phenomenon of anomalous dispersion.
From point of view, the dielectric relaxation includes the orientation polarization which influenced by molecular arrangement of dielectric material. Consequently, at high frequency, the polar molecules of dielectric move in a rotational motion but are not fast enough to achieve the balance with the field, accordingly dielectric constant appears to decline with increasing frequency because of the existence of polar groups in the natural filler. It was also observed that the increase in the filler content was accompanied by a decrease in the density of the system as well as a delay in the orientation of the dipoles. The modification of NCC with cationic surfactant (CTAB) led to increase in ε′ values of the composite. This increase is due the further addition of polar groups to the network by such modification.
The dielectric loss ε″ variant versus the applied frequency at room temperature ~ 25 °C for NR/NCC and NR/m-NCC composites with different filler content were depicted in Fig. 8. These curves are so complicated reflecting more than one process in addition to the high values of ε″ at low frequency range which may be due to the dc conductivity and the Maxwell Wagner which is due to the difference in permittivities and conductivities of the ingredients of the composites [34, 35]. The values of ε″ are found to be higher for composites containing modified NCC when compared with those for unmodified ones.
To understand the behavior of both ε′ and ε″ with NCC and m-NCC content, both values are illustrated graphically versus filler content at fixed frequency and shown in Fig. 9. From this figure, it is seen that both ε′ and ε″ values increase by increasing the filler content in the composite. Also it is seen that both values are pronouncedly high for composites contain m-NCC.
The dc electrical conductivity σ were calculated from the measured ac conductivity and the obtained data were illustrated graphically in Fig. 10. The electrical conductivity values were found to be in the order of 10–11 S/cm−1. This finding highly recommend such composites to be used in antistatic applications as the needed range for such application is 10–9–10–14 S/cm−1 [36].
Morphology of NR biocomposites
SEM was employed to clarify the surface morphology of NR, NR/5NCC, and NR/5 m-NCC (Fig. 11). Figure 11a shows the uniform and smooth surface of the unfilled NR composite while Fig. 11b, c show the nonuniform dispersion of cellulosic filler in the composites. Also, it is clear that the amorphous structure increase in case of m-NCC than NCC due to penetration of CTAB as cationic surfactant through the successive lamina. This observation is further confirmed by the resultant mechanical properties and XRD.
Conclusion
Nanocrystalline and modified nanocrystalline cellulose were successfully prepared and characterized by FT-IR and X-ray diffraction. Also, NCC and m-NCC were incorporated in natural rubber biocomposites with different content. The XRD results illustrated that the crystallinity increased from microcrystalline to nanocrystalline cellulose due to acid hydrolysis which could remove amorphous region such as hemicellulose or lignin. Rheometric properties also idicated that the m-NCC decreased the optimum cure time for the composites more than NCC. In addition to mechanical properties stated that NR/5NCC exhibited the highest tensile strength when compared to composite containing same ratio from m-NCC and NR respectively. Finally mechanical and electrical measurements recommended the composites to be used in antistatic application.
References
Rippel MM, Galembeck F (2009) Nanostructures and adhesion in natural rubber: new era for a classic. J Braz chem Soc 20:1024–1030
Mariano M, El Kissi N, Dufresne A (2016) Cellulose nanocrystal reinforced oxidized natural rubber nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 137:174–183
Katzenberg F, Tiller JC (2016) Shape memory natural rubber. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phy 54(14):1381–1388
Correia CA, Valera TS (2019) Cellulose nanocrystals and jute fiber-reinforced natural rubber composites: cure characteristics and mechanical properties. Mater Res 22:e20190192
Phomrak S, Phisalaphong M (2017) Reinforcement of natural rubber with bacterial cellulose via a latex aqueous microdispersion process. J Nanomater 2017:1–9
Tabsan N, Wirasate S, Suchiva K (2010) Abrasion behavior of layered silicate reinforced natural rubber. Wear 269:394–404
Shafik ES, Rozik NN, Abd El-Messieh SL, Younan AF (2020) Novel plasticizer for acrylonitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) and its effect on physico-mechanicaland electrical properties of the composites. Bull Mater sci 43(222):1–8
Zhang C, Dan Y, Peng J, Turng LS, Sabo R, Clemons C (2014) Thermal and mechanical properties of natural rubber composites reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals from Southern Pine. Adv Polym Technol 33:1–7
Jiang W, Gu J (2020) Nanocrystalline cellulose isolated from different renewable sources to fabricate natural rubber composites with outstanding mechanical properties. Cellulose 27:5801–5813
Zhou Y, Fan M, Chen L, Zhuang J (2015) Lignocellulosic fibre mediated rubber composites: an overview. Compos B Eng 76:180–191
Wang J, Chen D (2013) Mechanical properties of natural rubber nanocomposites filled with thermally treated attapulgite. J Nanomater 2013:1–13
Abdul Rashid ES, Julkapli NBM, Yehya WAH (2018) Reinforcement effect of nanocellulose on thermal stability of nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) composites. J Appl Polym Sci 46594:1–9
Wang YX, Tian HF, Zhang LN (2010) Role of starch nanocrystals and cellulose whiskers in synergistic reinforcement of waterborne polyurethane. Carbohydr Polym 80:665–671
Elena T, Joel T, David B, Long J, Michael W (2010) Thermal and mechanical properties of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)/cellulose nanowhiskers composites. Polymer 51:2652–2660
Thambiraj S, Shankaran DR (2017) Preparation and physicochemical characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from industrial waste cotton. Appl Surf Sci 412:405–416
Wardhono EY, Kanani N, Alfirano A (2019) A simple process of isolation microcrystalline cellulose using ultrasonic irradiation. J Dispers Sci Technol 41:1–10
Suhua X, Ju G, Yuanfang L, Demin J, Lin Y (2014) Influence of nanocrystalline cellulose on structure and properties of natural rubber/silica composites. Polym Compos 36:861–868
Yi J, Xu QX, Zhang XF, Zhang HL (2008) Chiral-nematic self-ordering of rodlike cellulose nanocrystals grafted with poly(styrene) in both thermotropic and lyotropic states. Polymer 49:4406–4412
Tu CW, Tsai FC, Chen JK, Wang HP, Lee RH, Zhang J, Chen T, Wang CC, Huang CF (2020) Preparations of tough and conductive PAMPS/PAA double network hydrogels containing cellulose nanofibers and polypyrroles. Polymers 12(2835):1–16
Tu CW, Tsai FC, Chang CJ, Yang CH, Kuo SW, Zhang J, Chen T, Huang CF (2019) Surface-initiated initiators for continuous activator regeneration (SI ICAR) ATRP of MMA from 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine–1–oxy (TEMPO) oxidized cellulose nanofibers for the preparations of PMMA nanocomposites. Polymers 11(1631):1–20
Huang CF, Tu CW, Lee RH, Yang CH, Hung WC, Lin KY (2019) Study of various diameter and functionality of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers on paraquat adsorptions. Polym Degrad Stab 161:206–212
Chen RD, Huang CF, Hsu S (2019) Composites of waterborne polyurethane and cellulose nanofibers for 3D printing and bioapplications. Carbohydr Polym 212:75–88
Huang CF, Chen JK, Tsai TY, Hsieh YA, Lin KY (2015) Dual-functionalized cellulose nanofibrils prepared through TEMPO mediated oxidation and surface-initiated ATRP*. Polymer 72:395–405
Cheng KC, Huang CF, Wei Y, Hsu S (2019) Novel chitosan–cellulose nanofiber selfhealing hydrogels to correlate self-healing properties of hydrogels with neural regeneration effects. NPG Asia Mater 11(25):1–17
Mandal A, Chakrabarty D (2011) Isolation of nanocellulose from waste sugarcane bagasse (SCB) and its characterization. Carbohydr Polym 86:1291–1299
Kaboorani A, Riedl B (2015) Surface modification of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) by a cationic surfactant. Ind Crop Prod 65:45–55
French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21:885–896
Visakh PM, Thomas S, Oksman K, Mathew AP (2012) Crosslinked natural rubber nanocomposites reinforced with cellulose whiskers isolated from bamboo waste: processing and mechanical/ thermal properties. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 43:735–741
Datta J, Wloch M (2017) Preparation, morphology and properties of natural rubber composites filled with untreated short jute fibres. Polym Bull 74:763–782
Lopattananon N, Panawarangkul K, Sahakaro K, Ellis B (2006) Performance of pineapple leaf fiber-natural rubber composites: the effect of fiber surface treatments. Appl Polym Sci 102:1974–1984
Kato H, Nakatsubo F, Abe K, Yano H (2015) Crosslinking via sulfur vulcanization of natural rubber and cellulose nanofibers incorporating unsaturated fatty acids. RSC Adv 5:29814–29819
Kumar A, Negi YS, Choudhary V, Bhardwaj NK (2014) Characterization of cellulose nanocrystals produced by acid-hydrolysis from sugarcane bagasse as agro-waste. J Mater Phys Chem 2:1–8
Kulshrestha U, Gupta T, Kumawat P, Jaiswal H, Ghosh SB, Sharma NN (2020) Cellulose nanofibre enabled natural rubber composites: Microstructure, curing behaviour and dynamic mechanical properties. Polym Test 90:106676
Abd El-Messieh SL, Younan AF, Shafik ES, Rabia AM, Rozik NN (2018) Ionic conductivity and mechanical properties of ionic liquids incorporated PMMA based polymer electrolytes. KGK 71(3):26–31
Rozik NN, Younan AF, Shafik ES, Abd El-Messieh SL, Rabia AM (2018) Mechanical and electrical properties of SBR composite filled with modified magnesium hydroxide by functionalized ionic liquid. KGK 71(5):49–55
Huang JC (2002) Carbon black filled conducting polymers and polymers blends. Adv Polym Technol 21:299–313
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shafik, E.S. Natural rubber biocomposites based on nanocrystalline and modified nanocrystalline cellulose: curing, mechanical, thermal and electrical properties. J Polym Res 28, 390 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-021-02750-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-021-02750-4