Introduction

With the rapid industrial development of textile, paper, food, leather and cosmetic industries, dyes are consumed in terrific amounts. These dyes are a serious source of pollution in water masses when discharged above a certain concentration in wastewater. Most dye agents have high toxic, teratogenic, mutagenic and cancerogenic effects [1, 2]. At the same time, many dyes are difficult to degrade biologically and are more resistant to environmental conditions. For this reason, they form a significant threat to human health and ecology [3]. One of these dyes, malachite green (MG) belongs to the triphenylmethane category. It is a green crystal powder and is a water-soluble cationic dye [4]. Adsorption is chosen more often compared to all other wastewater treatment processes (coagulation-flocculation, photodegradation, membrane filtration, biological degradation, electrolysis, ion exchange, etc.) for water reusability, due to its reasonable costs, efficiency, simple design, ease of use, being insensitive to toxic pollutant materials and not causing harmful agent formation [1, 3, 5,6,7,8].

Hydrogels are three-dimensional insoluble hydrophilic polymer networks that can absorb large amounts of water. Linked to their design, hydrogels can serve in comprehensive and countless applications in a variety of areas from biomedical applications to wastewater treatment applications due to both adjustable features and multifaceted production methods [9,10,11]. In recent years, due to the need for multifaceted materials, nanocomposite hydrogels with a variety of properties have been developed with the inclusion of different types of metallic (gold, silver and iron oxides), carbon-based (carbon nanotubes, graphene, nanodiamonds) and inorganic/ceramic (hydroxyapatite, silicates and calcium phosphate) nanoparticles or nanostructures within the hydrogel network to improve various properties of hydrogel and its disadvantages [12, 13].

Graphene, one of these nanomaterials researched to date, has attracted the great attention of researchers. Graphene oxide (GO) is a hydrophilic carbonaceous nanomaterial with many functional groups rich in oxygen on the surface (like COOH, –O– and –OH). It is easily dissolved in water and organic solvents. Due to unrivaled features like uncomplicated synthesis process, non-toxic structure, perfect chemical stability, good mechanical features and environmental friendliness, it has received great interest from researchers for applications in a variety of areas [14, 15]. GO has low cost and provides maximum surface area as an adsorbent for effective removal of pollutants from wastewater [15]. GO nanoparticles suspended in aqueous media have efficient pollutant removal activity at low dosage; however, the efficiency in removing these nanoparticles from the water for reuse is low [16]. To overcome this limitation, GO nanoparticles can be included in a polymer network to provide a composite material that has both broad surface area and ensures reuse of the material. Starch is a common polysaccharide comprised of D-glycose units found in abundant amounts in plants and represents a material with multifaceted and economic potential use in areas like the food industry, agriculture, medication and pharmaceuticals, environment and textile industries. The most interesting features of starch-based hydrogels are their cheapness, easy preparation with reactive, hydrophilic and non-toxic nature, biological compatibility and biological degradability [17]. HES polymers require crosslinking to improve features like stability and sturdiness. In the literature in recent times, there are very few studies about GO-starch-based composites and some of these examined applications as membrane filtering [18], drug delivery system [19] and adsorption [20, 21]. Another study reported a nanocomposite comprising starch, polyacrylamide and poly(2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonic acid) including GO layers for methylene blue adsorption [22].

This study presents a direct single-pot synthesis approach for a graphene oxide-starch nanocomposite (GO-HES) for the first time, for use as an effective, easily prepared and cheap new bio-adsorbent for removal of dye from waste. The importance of this study is the inclusion of HES as an intermediate part in suspension to prevent the clustering and precipitation problems of GO, providing a larger pore volume and ensuring reusability. In addition to swelling behavior of the prepared materials, morphology, chemical structure, and crystal features were analyzed with SEM, TEM, FTIR, XRD, BET and TGA, respectively. The synthesized composite hydrogel was researched for potential adsorption of the toxic basic dye-malachite green. The effect of a variety of experimental parameters like solution pH, initial dye concentration, equilibrium contact time, amount of adsorbent and temperature on the process using the synthesized composite hydrogels were examined. Additionally, the process kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamic analysis were performed to explain the adsorption mechanism for data obtained from adsorption studies. Finally, sequential adsorption–desorption cycles were completed to determine the reusability of GO-HES reported in this study.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Hydroxyethyl starch (HES, medium MW), divinyl sulfone (DVS, ≥ 96%) and graphite (≥ 99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich chemical company. Malachite green (C.I. 42,000, ≥ 99%) was purchased from Isolab chemicals.

Instruments

A scanning electron microscope (SEM, FEI-QUANTA FEG 250) was used to observe the microstructure of hydrogels. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging of hydrogels was accomplished using a JEOL TEM-1400-EDX. X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies were carried out with a PANalytical Empyrean device, operating parameters were λ = 1.54056 Å at 45 kV and 40 mA. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer 100 spectrometer device with ATR in the range of 650 cm−1–4000 cm−1. A Perkin Elmer TGA 8000 device (TGA) was employed to analyze thermal degradation of samples, which were heated from 30 to 900 °C under nitrogen flow at heating rate of 10 °C/min. The surface areas of the hydrogels were determined by multipoint BET (Quantachrome QuadraSorb SI). UV–VIS absorption spectra were recorded on a T80 + UV/VIS Spectrometer, PG Ins. Ltd.

Preparations of HES Hydrogel

A HES solution was prepared by dispersing HES in 0.2 mol/L NaOH at a concentration of 50 mg/L, stirred at 600 rpm at room temperature for 120 min. The preparation of the HES hydrogel was completed in a single main step. For this, 2 mL HES solution had 240 µL DVS added as a cross-linker and mixed homogeneously and then transferred to a straw with 5 mm diameter with the aid of an injector. A few minutes later, gelation occurred. Later, gels were cut to 3 mm in length. After washing several times during one day in distilled water, they were dried at room temperature and stored for experimental studies.

Preparations of GO-HES Nanocomposite Hydrogel

Graphene oxide was synthesized from graphite using Hummer’s method [23]. The preparation of GO-HES hydrogel was completed in a single main step. For the preparation of the GO-HES composites, firstly, GO powder (1.29; 3.78; 6.14; 8.39; 10.54, w%) was distributed ultrasonically in 2 mL HES solution for 10 min. Later, after 240 µL DVS was added, it was mixed homogeneously and transferred to a straw with 5 mm diameter with the aid of an injector. A few minutes later, gelation occurred. Later gels were cut to 3 mm in length. After washing several times during one day in distilled water, they were dried at room temperature and stored for experimental studies.

Swelling Studies

According to previous reports, the swelling behavior (S) of hydrogels was tested in distilled water [24, 25].

$$S\%={(M}_{t}-{M}_{0})/{M}_{0} \times 100$$
(1)

M0 and Mt are the dry weight of the hydrogel initially and the weight of the swollen hydrogel at regular time intervals or after equilibrium swelling is reached.

Batch Adsorption Experiments

To determine the batch adsorption features for MG adsorption affected by different experimental factors, adsorption experiments were completed with defined durations, definite volume (10 mL) of MG solution in 50 mL centrifuge tubes. Various adsorption conditions of initial feed concentration of dye solution (25; 50; 75; 125; 250 mg/L), pH of dye solution (2.0; 3.0; 4.5; 5.5; 6.5; 7.5; 8.5; 10.0), dosage of composite hydrogel (1; 2; 4; 6.5 mg/ml), and temperature of dye solution (21; 37; 50 °C) were investigated. After adsorption, the MG amount remaining in solution was measured with a UV–Vis spectrophotometer at 616 nm maximum wavelength. The MG adsorption capacity Q (mg/g) and MG removal percentage ratio (R%) were calculated using Eqs. (2) and (3), respectively [25].

$${Q}_{ads} (\frac{mg}{g})={(C}_{0}-{C}_{t})V/M$$
(2)
$$R \%={(C}_{0}-{C}_{t})/{C}_{0}\times 100$$
(3)

Here, C0 (mg/L) and Ct (mg/L) are the MG concentration before the adsorption process and after the adsorption process, respectively. V (mL) is the MG solution volume and M (mg) is the mass of the adsorbent.

Desorption and Reusability

The adsorbent was first saturated in an MG solution (25 mg/L) for 24 h duration for desorption and reuse studies. The adsorbent dosage was 20 mg in 10 mL dye solution and the solution pH was 8.5. For the desorption studies, the adsorbent was dipped in 0.1 M HCl (aq) for 24 h and release of all dye was ensured. Then it was rinsed with distilled water. After the hydrogels were dried, they were used again. The same adsorbent was used for adsorption and desorption three times repeatedly. The MG desorption capacity Q (mg/g) and desorption efficiency percentage were calculated using Eqs. (4) and (5), respectively [26].

$${Q}_{des} (\frac{mg}{g})={(C}_{f})V/M$$
(4)
$$Desorption \%={(Q}_{des}/{Q}_{ads})\times 100$$
(5)

Here, Cf (mg/L) is the MG concentration in solvent. V (mL) is the MG solvent volume and M (mg) is the mass of the adsorbent.

Results and Discussion

During the preparation of hydrogels, the double vinyl group of DVS, a hydrophobic molecule with low water affinity, was reacted with the hydroxyl groups of HES to form a three-dimensional network and cross-linker points formed through covalent bonding. This reaction occurs in basic media where the main hydroxyl groups are ionized and the alkoxide groups provided the formation of ether bonds after attack by the DVS pair [27]. During the synthesis of the GO-HES composite hydrogel, GO was firstly homogeneously distributed between the dissolved HES macromolecular chains. Due to the large specific surface area of GO and functional groups containing significant oxygen, HES macromolecular chains can easily hold the GO surface through hydrogen bonding and prevent the precipitation of GO within the solution [28]. The reaction mechanisms proposed for the GO-HES hydrogel and HES hydrogel are given in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic synthesis mechanism of a HES hydrogel and b GO-HES nanocomposite hydrogel

Full size image

Characterization of Hydrogel

The surface morphology of the HES hydrogel and GO-HES composite hydrogel was measured using an SEM and images are shown in Fig. 2. The images in Fig. 2 show the hydrogel has a crosslinked three-dimensional network structure. GO appears to be homogeneously distributed within the hydrogel matrix in Fig. 1. Due to the interaction of GO with HES active chains, agglomeration and cluster formation due to GO were not observed in the GO-HES composite hydrogel; thus, the stabilized network structures were preserved. Additionally, to further examine the GO-HES composite hydrogel morphology, TEM images were obtained. Figure 3 shows the surface with pore cavities in TEM micrographs. The layered structure formed by GO nano-leaves located within the network can be observed.

Fig. 2
figure 2

SEM images of the a, b HES hydrogel and c, d GO-HES nanocomposite hydrogel for different magnifications a, b × 5000 c, d × 10,000

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

TEM images of the a GO particle and b GO-HES nanocomposite hydrogel

Full size image

TGA measurements were completed to provide additional proof of the presence of GO in the GO-HES structure and to investigate thermal stability behavior and results are shown in Fig. 4. The results show that the hydrogels have two degradation stages. For the HES hydrogel, the main degradation occurs with 90% mass loss in the temperature interval 200–400 °C. For the GO-HES hydrogel, the main degradation occurs from 300–350 °C with nearly 70% mass loss. Here, the degradation may be due to the breakage of the polymer chains and the separation of the crosslinked network. Additionally, the HES hydrogel undergoes a second degradation from 400 to 750 °C with nearly 10% mass loss. For the GO-HES hydrogel, the second degradation occurs from 400 to 850 °C with nearly 25% mass loss. The composite hydrogel obtained by the inclusion of GO particles within the HES hydrogel network was increased thermal stability. This may be associated with the improved physical interactions in the hydrogel network.

Fig. 4
figure 4

TGA curve of the a HES hydrogel and b GO-HES nanocomposite hydrogel

Full size image

The XRD models for HES and GO-HES hydrogels are shown in Fig. 5. The XRD peaks for GO-HES composite hydrogels display larger differences than HES hydrogels. On the XRD patterns, the HES hydrogel has a range of strong characteristic reflection peaks showing a definite crystal structure, while the GO-HES only has a broad refractive peak at 2θ = 18.5°, indicating low crystalline and amorphous structure, as seen in Fig. 2. There are fewer reflection peaks due to the GO content significantly reducing the intensity of reflection peaks of HES hydrogels in the GO-HES composite hydrogels. Thus, the regularity of the polymer macromolecular chains is destroyed by the addition of GO [29, 30].

Fig. 5
figure 5

XRD spectra of a HES hydrogel and b GO-HES nanocomposite hydrogel

Full size image

The FTIR spectra for the (a) unmodified pure HES, (b) cross-linker DVS, (c) GO particles, (d) HES hydrogel crosslinked with DVS and (e) GO-HES composite hydrogel are shown in Fig. 6. The distinctive peaks at 1284 and 1105 cm−1 belonging to crosslinked HES hydrogel are attributed to strong asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of the sulfone (O=S=O) group [31]. In the GO-HES composite hydrogel, the characteristic peaks at 3483, 1387 and 1017 cm−1 indicate the presence of stretching of O–H, C–H (ring) and C–O–C groups [32]. Due to the overlapping of these peaks belonging to GO and HES, the peak signals are essentially increased. The results show that the hydrogel and composite hydrogel were successfully obtained.

Fig. 6
figure 6

FTIR spectrum of the a HES, DVS and GO particle; b HES hydrogel and GO-HES nanocomposite hydrogel

Full size image

The pore volume distributions for the HES hydrogel and GO-HES composite hydrogel were determined using Brunauer-Emmett Teller (BET) analysis. According to the analysis results, when GO is added, the surface area rose from 1.843 to 2.094 m2/g; additionally, the mean pore size for HES and GO-HES was 4.23 and 6.54 nm. The addition of the GO nanolayer during hydrogel formation transformed it into a nanolayer structure with great intersecting pores; thus, there was an increase in the hydrogel porosity and surface area of the composite hydrogels.

Figure 7a shows the effect of the amount of GO particles in the composite hydrogel network on equilibrium swelling values. The swelling ratio of the hydrogel increased as the GO amount increased. The reason for this is that the increase in oxygen functional groups from GO in the network structure developed the hydrophilic nature of the hydrogel and allowed the hydrogel to absorb more water [33]. Figure 7b shows the swelling curves against time for the hydrogel and composite hydrogel. The swelling ratio for the hydrogels rapidly increased in the first 5 min and 1 h later, equilibrium was reached. Due to the presence of other functional groups provided by GO, the GO-HES composite hydrogels had a higher swelling ratio than the HES hydrogel. Figure 7c shows the equilibrium swelling values under different pH conditions. In neutral and basic pH media, an increase in ionized carboxyl groups on GO particles within the composite hydrogel network and the anion-anion repulsive forces cause an increase in osmotic pressure in the composite hydrogels [34]. For this reason, swelling values increase with the increase in pH values.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Swelling curve of a GO-HES composite hydrogel with different ratios of GO content in distilled water, b GO-HES (GO w%, 8.39) composite hydrogel in various pH solutions, c HES hydrogel, GO-HES (GO w%, 8.39) composite hydrogel versus time in distilled water

Full size image

Adsorption Studies of Composite Hydrogel

For MG dye adsorption, the HES hydrogel and the effect of different proportions of GO content within the GO-HES composite hydrogel were researched and the results obtained are given in Fig. 8a. The experiments were completed at the original pH (4.5) of the solution (no pH adjustment) in 10 mL MG solution (25 mg/L) at room temperature (21 °C) with 24 h contact time and 2 mg/mL adsorbent dosage. In the Figure, with the increase in GO content of composite hydrogels, the removal of MG dye increased significantly compared with HES hydrogel. The dye removal percentage for the HES hydrogel was 13.2%, while the removal percentage for the composite hydrogel containing 10.54% GO was 57.6%. These results may be linked to the increase in the number of functional groups in the network structure with the inclusion of GO particles which contain many carboxylic groups in the HES hydrogel. When the GO content of the composite hydrogel rises above 8.39%, there is no severe change observed in the adsorption efficiency. This may be due to less usability of the active sites in the network structure for binding to MG dye molecules. For this reason, adsorption studies continued with HES hydrogels containing 8.39% GO. Similar results were obtained by Eltaweil using carboxymethyl cellulose/carboxylated graphene oxide composite microbeads for methylene blue adsorption [35].

Fig. 8
figure 8

Effect of a different ratios of GO content in the hydrogel, b GO-HES (GO w%, 8.39) composite hydrogel dosage, c pH of the MG solution on adsorption capacity of the GO-HES composite hydrogel (GO w%, 8.39)

Full size image

The effect of GO-HES composite hydrogel dosage on MG dye adsorption was researched using adsorbent dosages from 10 to 65 mg and the results are plotted in Fig. 8b. Experiments were completed at the original pH (4.5) of the solution (no pH adjustment) with 10 mL MG solution (25 mg/L) at room temperature with 24 h contact duration. With the increasing adsorbent dosage, the removal percentage of MG increased in stages and then reduced slightly and remained constant. This result may be due to the increase in active sites on the adsorbent due to the increase in adsorbent amount while dye concentration remained fixed. Similar results were reported in previous studies [36, 37].

Solution pH is accepted as an important adsorption parameter affecting the surface charge of the adsorbent. For this reason, the effect of pH on removal % for adsorption of MG dye is shown in Fig. 8c. Experiments were completed with pH varying from 2 to 10, in MG solution (25 mg/L) at room temperature with 24 h contact duration and 2 mg/mL adsorbent. As shown in Figure, as solution pH increased in stages from 2 to 10, the adsorption removal % increased from 34 to 90%. The adsorption efficiency significantly increased with pH and later reached equilibrium at pH 8.5. This phenomenon is due to reduced electrostatic attraction affinity for cationic MG dye with the fall in pH values linked to protonation of the carboxylate groups in the composite hydrogels. This causes a fall in adsorption capacity. With the increase in pH values, the carboxylate groups on the adsorbent were deprotonated and the number of groups with strong negative charge increased. Thus, the electrostatic attraction affinity for cationic MG dye of composite hydrogels may increase and high removal efficiency may be obtained. For MG adsorption studies, the solution pH was chosen as 8.5. Other new studies reported that the increase in negative charges obtained on the adsorbent surface linked to solution pH similarly increased adsorption capacity [16, 38, 39].

The interaction between the MG molecules and GO-HES composite hydrogel surface is shown in Fig. 9. Essentially, the positive charge (= N+) groups on the cationic dye of MG may interact with the functional groups (COO–) on GO-HES with a negative charge in an alkali medium through electrostatic attraction. Functional groups containing oxygen in the HES structure form a hydrogen bond with amine groups on MG. Additionally, aromatic rings in the MG structure may interact through π-π interaction with aromatic rings on GO [40].

Fig. 9
figure 9

Schematic illustration of the adsorption mechanism between GO-HES composite hydrogel and MG-dye

Full size image

Investigation of adsorption kinetics is very important to understand the adsorption equilibrium duration and adsorption rate. To assess the effect of contact duration on adsorption of MG dye on GO-HES composite hydrogel, adsorption experiments were performed in a variety of time intervals from 1 to 30 h with 2 mg/mL adsorbent dose, solution pH 8.5, and 125 mg/L MG at room temperature. Figure 10a shows the removal of MG by the GO-HES composite hydrogel as a function of contact duration. As shown in the Figure, the adsorption of MG by the adsorbent increases rapidly within the first 10 h due to the empty active sites on the adsorbent at the start of adsorption. Later, adsorption progressed toward equilibrium slowly and in stages according to the reduction in adsorption sites. As can be seen, the maximum adsorption capacity of 57.5 mg/g was reached in 30 h.

Fig. 10
figure 10

a Effect of adsorption time on adsorption capacity of the composite hydrogel, b Pseudo-first-order and c Pseudo-second-order model plots for MG-dye adsorption by composite hydrogel

Full size image

Data obtained in this way were tested for fit to the Lagergren pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models [20, 27]. The equations, kinetic constants and regression coefficients (R2) for both models are shown in Table 1. At the same time, the graph for each model is shown in Fig. 10b and c. The calculated experimental adsorption capacity was 57.5 mg/g was found to have a good fit to the theoretical adsorption capacity 59.9 mg/g in the pseudo-second-order model. Additionally, the pseudo-second-order model showed a higher R2 value compared to other models (0.985). Thus, adsorption of MG dye on the GO-HES composite hydrogel surface was concluded to abide by the pseudo-second-order model.

Table 1 Isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic parameters for MG adsorption onto composite hydrogel at 294 K
Full size table

Measurements were performed with solutions containing different initial dye concentrations to research the effect of initial dye concentration on adsorption capacity. Adsorption experiments were completed with varying initial feed concentrations using 2 mg/mL adsorbent dose and solution pH 8.5. At a fixed temperature, the correlation between MG dye initial concentration with GO-HES composite hydrogel equilibrium adsorption capacity is shown in Fig. 11a. As seen in Figure, with the increase in initial dye concentration from 25.0 to 250.0 mg/L, the adsorption capacity continuously increased from 12.4 to 85.0 mg/g. This is because, at higher dye concentrations, a more attractive force is needed to overcome the mass transfer resistance between the dye solution and adsorbent [22, 41].

Fig. 11
figure 11

a Effect of initial feed concentration of the solution on adsorption capacity of the composite hydrogel, b Langmuir isotherm and c Freundlich isotherm model plots for MG-dye adsorption by composite hydrogel

Full size image

Isotherm analysis of adsorption provides valuable information about the behavior and interactions between adsorption molecules and adsorbent efficiency. Experimental data were tested with the two classic isotherm models of Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models (Fig. 11b, c). Equations, kinetic constants and regression coefficients (R2) for both models are shown in Table 1. The Langmuir isotherm model is based on the assumption that adsorption occurs in a single layer on a homogeneous surface, while the Freundlich isotherm model is based on the assumption that adsorption occurs on a multilayered and heterogeneous surface [20, 27]. The results show the Langmuir model is compatible with the experimental isotherm data compared to the Freundlich model (R2 = 0.995 vs. 0.979). Additionally, the calculated experimental adsorption capacity of 85.0 mg/g fits better with the theoretical adsorption capacity calculated with the Langmuir model of 89.3 mg/g. Thus, it may be assumed that the adsorption mechanism for MG on GO-HES occurs on a homogeneous surface in a single layer.

Experiments were completed at various temperatures, with 125 mg/L MG solution (pH 8.5) at room temperature with 24 h contact duration and 2 mg/mL adsorbent used. The results obtained from adsorption studies completed at 21, 37 and 50 °C are shown in Fig. 12a. In parallel with the increase in temperature, there was an increase in interactions at the active adsorption sites and the removal percentage rose from 91.1% (20 °C) to 97.8% (50 °C). This result revealed the endothermic nature of the process.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Effect of a temperature on adsorption capacity of the composite hydrogel, b adsorption/desorption cycle of composite hydrogel

Full size image

Adsorption thermodynamics provide beneficial information about energy exchange during the adsorption process. Experimental data were fitted to the Van’t Hoff equation. The equations, constants and regression coefficients (R2) related to this are shown in Table 1. Considering the ΔG0 values in Table 1, the adsorption of MG on GO-HES can be said to be spontaneous and dominated by physical interactions [42]. Additionally, the positive ΔH0 value confirms the endothermic nature of the adsorption process, supporting the increase in MG adsorption with the increase in temperature.

In recent times, many different adsorbents with varying structures and compositions containing GO were prepared and used for the removal of a variety of dyes from wastewater. For this reason, the adsorption of MG dye on the GO-HES composite hydrogel prepared in this study was compared with some adsorbents in the literature (Table 2). Some of those, the calculated maximum adsorption capacity values of starch-graft-poly(acrylamide)/graphene oxide/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite hydrogel, Fe3O4@SiO2–graphene oxides core–shell magnetic microspheres, magnetic carboxymethyl functionalized chitosan-graphene oxide composite, graphene oxide/aminated lignin aerogels were 297, 265.87, 289.1 and 113.5 mg/g, respectively [43,44,45,46]. The results show that the GO-HES composite hydrogel (Qmax,cal = 89.3 mg/g) may compete with other adsorbents and has efficient dye removal activity.

Table 2 Comparison of some adsorbents discussed in the literature for MG adsorption capacity
Full size table

In order to be an effective and potential adsorbent for the removal of dyes, the reuse of the adsorbent is as important as the efficient removal of dyes in both environmental and industrial terms. After five consecutive cycles, the removal efficiency for MG remained above 90% (Fig. 12b). Results revealed that the composite hydrogel is a suitable reusable adsorbent to remove MG from aqueous solutions.

Conclusion

Hydroxyethyl starch hydrogel and hydroxyethyl starch-graphene oxide (HES-GO) nanocomposite hydrogel were prepared in one step in a simple process using divinyl sulfone as a cross-linker. The properties of the developed hydrogels were characterized in detail and their effectiveness in removing malachite green from aqueous solution was investigated. SEM and TEM analyzes showed that the hydrogels have a porous and crosslinked 3-D network structure. The low swelling capacity showed the benefit of using it as an adsorbent. Experimental adsorption studies have shown that dye adsorption at a dosage of 2 mg/mL adsorbent at 24 h and basic pH has a maximum adsorption capacity of 85.0 mg/g at 25 °C. In addition, the adsorption kinetics is compatible with the pseudo-second-order kinetic model and the adsorption mechanism is compatible with the Langmuir isotherm model. The desorption experiment with 0.1 (M) hydrochloric acid revealed that the effect of repeated use is high, and the adsorbents used can be fully recovered. Hence, HES-GO hydrogel is an easily prepared, environmentally friendly and economical adsorbent that can efficiently remove dyes from aqueous solutions.