Abstract
This study examined the impact of acculturative stress and social support (family and friend) on psychological distress among Asian American immigrants and three Asian sub-groups (Vietnamese, Filipino and Chinese) immigrants. The National Latino and Asian American Study 2002–2003 dataset was used. The study findings were: (1) among all Asian American immigrants high language barrier and discrimination stress were associated with increased level of psychological distress, but similar association was not present for legal stress; (2) among all Asian American immigrants high family social support decreased the levels of psychological distress, and in addition, friend social support buffered the relationship of discrimination and psychological distress; and (3) among Vietnamese, Filipino, and Chinese, differential association of social support and acculturative stress to psychological distress were observed. These findings highlight the importance of social support among Asian American immigrants, while also paying attention to the variation that may exist between different sub-groups.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Background
Asian Americans are the fastest growing racial group in the United States, with reported population growth of 46 % compared to the total US population growth of about 10 % in the last decade [1]. About 70 % of Asian Americans reported being foreign-born, and constituted around one-fourth of the nation’s total foreign-born population [1]. The process of immigrating to a new country with the subsequent exposure to a new culture and environment can be a challenge to immigrants. During their acculturative process immigrants’ risk for mental health problems increase as a result of exposure to acculturative stress and loss of culturally mediated and protective social resources, such as, strong family relations, cultural values, and social networks [2–5]. The relationship of stress and mental health is well established in literature, but, the unique stressors experienced by immigrants need to be investigated. Awareness of these unique stressors and social support are crucial factors in understanding the needs of this immigrant population.
Limited studies assessing the mental health indicators of Asian Americans, report lower prevalence rates of mental disorder among Asian Americans in comparison to other racial/ethnic populations [6]. These low reports have been explained by the protective effect of cultural buffering, i.e. cultural values that endorse emotional restraint and fear of losing face [7–9]. Additional disaggregation of the heterogeneous Asian American population in research aids in clarifying these mixed reports on their prevalence and incidence of mental disorder [6, 10, 11]. This research seeks to investigate whether social support, as measured by family and friend support, buffers against the negative effects of acculturative stress on mental health, thus acting as a protective element against psychological distress. This research study not only highlights the heterogeneity that exists among Asian immigrant populations, but provides further insight into understanding differential patterns of mental health status among Asian immigrant populations.
Conceptual Framework
The concept of acculturative stress is rooted in the stress and coping theory, which examines adaptation to stressful life events and engagement in various coping strategies among people [12–14]. According to this theoretical perspective, acculturation can be advantageous (e.g. providing work or education opportunities) or harmful (e.g. exposure to stressful events) that may lead to acculturative stress, which is an indicator of the insufficiency of adaptive resources to support adjustment to a new culture [15–17]. Major acculturative stress for immigrants includes, legal fear, discrimination and language barrier. Impact of legal fear on mental health among Asian immigrants has not been investigated. Limited research on discrimination specific to immigrant’s experience has been done among immigrant populations and demonstration a negative effect on their physical and mental health [18–22]. Recent studies on poor English language comprehension and proficiency have shown a negative relationship with mental health [23–25].
Social support is a powerful resource for individuals experiencing stressful life changes, particularly the stress of adjusting to a new culture [26, 27]. According to the social support and network theory, there are direct and indirect pathways through which social support impacts health. Social support has a direct main effect on health by enhancing sense of belonging, companionship and reassurance of self worth regardless of stress levels [28]. Social support also indirectly impacts health by buffering the relationship of stress and health [29–31]. Social epidemiological studies suggest that there are beneficial effects of support from friends and family [32], where strong family and community support [33–36] among immigrant populations is associated with better mental health. Friends and family members may provide important resources, such as, assistance in finding employment, help accessing legal and economic support, and may influence individual’s engagement with health protective behaviors (e.g. vaccinations or preventive screening) that impacts overall health [37, 38]. However, not all social connections are beneficial. Research shows that negative interactions, such as family conflict, competition for limited resources can adversely affect psychological well-being [38]. Since many Asian immigrants posses a collective cultural orientation, social support may have a unique influence on their mental health [39, 40].
The specific aims of the study were to: (1) examine if acculturative stress including legal stress, language barriers, and discrimination, had a direct and independent effect on psychological distress among Asian American immigrants; (2) examine the buffering action of family and friend social support on the relationship of acculturative stress and psychological distress among Asian American immigrants; (3) examine if acculturative stress including legal stress, language barriers, and discrimination, had a direct and independent effect on psychological distress among three Asian American immigrant sub-groups, Vietnamese Filipinos, and Chinese.
Method
Participants
Data from the National Latino and Asian American Study (NLAAS) 2002–2003 was analyzed. The NLAAS is a nationally representative community household survey that estimates the prevalence of mental disorders and rates of mental health service utilization by Latinos and Asian Americans in the United States [41, 42]. The NLAAS Asian sample comprised of the NLAAS Core sample, designed with 63 PSU nationally representing the entire US. Asian American adult population and the NLAAS High-Density (HD) supplemental sample, which consisted of geographic areas with greater than 5 % residential density for three individual Asian national origins groups of interest, Vietnamese, Filipino, and Chinese. When the NLAAS HD samples of targeted national origin groups were properly weighted for sample inclusion probabilities and pooled together with the NLAAS core sample, it provided a representative sample of the entire national Asian American adult population [43].
Data Collection
The NLAAS has a total sample size of 2095 Asian American adults, with four ethnic groups-Vietnamese, Filipinos, Chinese, and individuals of “Other” Asian Ancestry. The instrument was translated into three Asian languages, Chinese, Tagalog, and Vietnamese, and interviews were conducted in the preferred language of the respondent [44]. This study includes only those respondents who are foreign-born and defined as immigrants. The total sample size in this research was 1639 Asian American immigrants, with 502 Vietnamese, 349 Filipinos, 473 Chinese, and 315 Other Asians. Weighted response rates were 69.3 % for primary respondents and 73.6 % for secondary respondents [45].
Psychological Distress
The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) was used to measure psychological distress [46]. This scale measured the amount of distress experienced by responds during the last 30 days. This scale was created from 10 questions and coded as a continuous variable, where scores ranged from 0 (being the least distressed) and 50 (being the most distressed) with Cronbach’s α = 0.90. Cronbach’s α for K10 scale was 0.87 for Vietnamese, 0.84 for Filipino and 0.84 for Chinese sub-groups.
Acculturative Stress
The Acculturative Stress scale, adapted from the Mexican–American Prevalence and Services Survey (MAPSS) [33] and the Occupational/Emotional Stress subscale of the Hispanic Stress Inventory (HSI) was used [47]. This scale assessed legal stress, discrimination, and language barrier. Questions to measure legal stress were: have you been questioned about your legal status; do you think you will be deported if you go to a social or government agency; and do you avoid seeking health services due to fear of immigration officials. Questions to measure discrimination stress were: do you find it difficult to find the work you want because you are of Asian descent; do you feel that in the United States you have the respect you had in your country of origin; and do people treat you badly because they think you do not speak English well or speak with an accent. Questions for measuring language barrier were: do you find it hard to interact with others because of difficulties you have with English language. Individual item responses were dichotomous (yes/no), with score ranged from 0 to 3 for legal stress (Cronbach’s α is 0.65 for total sample, 0.67 for Vietnamese, 0.57 for Filipino, and 0.80 for Chinese), 0–3 for discrimination (Cronbach’s α = is 0.63 for total sample, 0.65 for Vietnamese, 0.59 for Filipino, and 0.60 for Chinese), and 0–1 for language barrier. Response scores were further dichotomized as any versus none level of acculturative stress for each of the three factors.
Social Support
Similar parallel question were asked to measure family and friend social support. As has been recommended in the literature [36] we normalized these indexes to zero mean and standard deviation of one. This variable was coded as continuous where scores ranged from 0 to 20, with Cronbach’s α = 0.59 for family social support and Cronbach’s α = 0.71 for friend social support.
Socio-demographic Variables
Socio-demographic variables included in analyses were: age, gender, education, marital status, household income, work status, and immigration-related factors (reason to immigrate, age at immigration and years spent since immigrating to the US).
Analysis
Descriptive statistics to analyze the demographic characteristics of the study sample was done. This was followed by bivariate analysis to examine the association between all the independent variables in the study. Finally, a series of logistic regressions models were estimated for the total Asian American immigrant population to test the effects of acculturative stress, social support and covariates on psychological distress. The first model estimated the effects of all the acculturative stressors on psychological distress controlling for socio-demographics. The second model tested estimated the effect of social support (family and friend) and immigration related factors on psychological distress. Next, the full model along with interaction testing between acculturative stress and social support (family and friend) on psychological distress was done. In addition, regression models were also run for the Asian American immigrant sub-groups (Vietnamese, Filipinos, and Chinese) to test the effects of acculturative stress and family and friend social support, on psychological distress. The “Other” group that included multiple Asian subgroups was not included in the analysis as no conclusive understanding was possible from the results. Survey design effects (stratum, cluster, and individual weights) were taken into account throughout the analyses to make the weighted sample represent the target national population and the estimation of confidence intervals in the presence of stratification and clustering. All analyses were conducted using STATA 10.
Results
Table 1 summarizes descriptive statistics for key demographics and independent variables for Asian American immigrants and each specific sub-group. Respondents reported that increased language barriers and higher levels of discrimination were important sources of acculturative stress. Filipinos were less likely than other groups to report that language barriers were a substantial source of acculturative stress. The majority of participants reported immigrating for better job opportunities and/or to join family members. Vietnamese respondents also reported that seeking refugee status was a major reason for immigration. Two-thirds of the total Asian immigrants came to US after the age of 18 years, and more than 65 % had lived longer than 10 years in the US.
Table 2 reports mean values of family and friend support indexes by categories of acculturative stress, immigration related factors and SES. Acculturative stress related to language barrier and discrimination both had a strong, negative association with family and friend social support. Legal stress showed a significant negative correlation with friend social support but not with family social support. For immigration related factors, refugee status was the only variable that showed significant negative correlation with both family and friend social support. Joining family members had significant negative relation to only friend social support. Age at immigration was significantly associated with only friend social support, and no significant associations were seen for the years spent in the US and indexes of social support.
Table 3 presents results of the multiple regression models for psychological distress of the total Asian American immigrant sample. In model 1, language barriers and discrimination were significantly associated with psychological distress after controlling for demographics and SES. In model 2, there was a strong significant negative association of family social support and psychological distress. Acculturative stress of discrimination remained significantly related to psychological distress. Model 3 showed a significant buffering effect for friend social support on the relationship between discrimination and psychological distress.
Table 4 illustrates the full model for each of the Asian American immigrant sub-groups. Results for Vietnamese group showed a significant positive association of legal stress and language barriers in association to psychological distress. There was also a significant negative association between family social support and psychological distress. Seeking refugee status as the reason for immigration was significantly associated with psychological distress among Vietnamese respondents. Results for the Filipino group showed a significant positive association between acculturative stresses related to discrimination and psychological distress. No significant association was noted for family and friend social support and psychological distress among Filipino immigrants. Results for the Chinese group showed a significant association between legal stress and psychological distress. There is a significant positive association between seeking refugee status as a reason to immigrate and psychological distress. There was a significant positive association between seeking refugee status as a reason to immigrate, age at immigration and years spent in the US to psychological distress. There is also a significant negative association between family social support and psychological distress.
Discussion
The study findings indicate a relationship of language barriers and discrimination stress to psychological distress among Asian American immigrants. The results are consistent with previous studies on racial and ethnic discrimination that are associated with a poorer physical and mental health outcomes [48–50]. The relationship between these stressors and impaired mental health is likely complex. Experiencing discrimination can lead to feelings of lost respect and might contribute to difficulties finding employment, which could cause psychological distress. Therefore, observed higher levels of psychological distress among immigrant populations may be, at least, partially attributable to the presence of acculturative stress associated with immigration rather than a reflection of some fundamental difference in psychological functioning.
This study adds to the existing literature on language skills proficiency in research conducted in Asian American populations. The inability to communicate effectively because of a lack of familiarity with the American accent and/or idioms can create language barriers for immigrants who are not proficient in the English language. The positive association between language barriers and increased psychological distress suggests that language skills are salient factors that can affect mental health. Because the underutilization of health services among Asian Americans has been largely attributed to language difficulties and lower language proficiency [51], interventions aimed at reducing language barriers are needed.
The findings also indicate that there are important differences in psychological distress among subgroups of the Asian population, suggesting that heterogeneity of the population should be considered in research and practice. Among Vietnamese, psychological distress was strongly associated with higher levels of legal stress and greater language barriers despite facilitation of their immigration process as a refugee. The findings from this study are consistent with previous research that has shown that Vietnamese immigrants report poorer physical and mental health in comparisons to other Asian ethnic groups due to their refugee experience and decreased personal resources [52, 53]. Among Filipino respondents, psychological distress was most strongly correlated with discrimination. As a group, Filipinos tend to be highly educated and come to the US with better job opportunities and resources that may assist in their settlement and immigration process [48]. However, higher job placements may expose them to glass ceiling effect that may explain their reporting of discrimination as a significant source of psychological distress. The results from Chinese respondents indicated that psychological distress was significantly associated with legal stress. Failing to find a significant association between discrimination and psychological distress in this group may be partially explained by the large numbers of Chinese ethnic enclaves that provide increased opportunities to live and work. These self-sustained communities can limit the need to interact with others in English, thus mitigating concerns related to language proficiency. When taken as a whole, these findings emphasize the diversity of Asian immigrant experiences, including differences in the factors that affect psychological health. Recognizing that heterogeneity is important to understanding the mental health outcomes of Asian immigrants will be important to creating effective interventions to improve mental health status.
The study also highlights the significant and independent role of family social support in decreasing psychological distress among Asian American immigrants, especially among Vietnamese and Chinese immigrants. Collectively, these findings indicate that family support is essential for all Asian American immigrants, but it may have a stronger support role for specific Asian populations. Surprisingly, only friend support significantly buffered the association of discrimination stress and psychological distress counter to our assumptions on the buffering impact of social support. This may be explained by shared limited resources among family members that prevent them from buffering the impact of acculturative stress on mental health. However, social support from friends may help in buffering and coping with discrimination stress and moderating its impact on psychological distress.
Limitations
The results of this study are intriguing but bear some caveats. This study was a cross-sectional survey and therefore does not allow us to make any causal inferences. Secondly, limited factors were examined as a part of acculturative stress and these reduced questions may be responsible for a lower Cronbach’s alpha in the study. An important factor to consider would be goal striving stress and social mobility that is experienced by immigrants. Most immigrants come to the US in search of better opportunities for themselves and their future generations, therefore it is important to study the impact of pre-immigration expectations and post immigration achievements as reported by immigrants on mental health outcomes. Finally, only three main sub-groups in this study were identified, Vietnamese, Filipinos, and Chinese. Other major sub-groups like Korean, Asian Indian, and Japanese were grouped together in the ‘Others’ group, that made it difficult to perform a more detailed analysis of the ‘Others’ Asian group.
New Contribution to Literature
This study contributes to the literature by examining understudied aspects of acculturative stress and social support among a nationally representative sample of Asian American immigrants. It was found that these relationships are significant and different for the various sup-groups, as patterns of association vary due to different immigration related factors and social support. Asian immigrants are a heterogeneous group, with varied resources before and after their migration that expose them to different stressors. These personal, social and economic resources may impact access and utilization of health care services, and influence patient-provider interaction. For example, highly educated immigrants may have better skills to negotiate the health care system when compared to refugee migrants. Awareness of these stressors can assist policy makers in developing and supporting the needs of the immigrant community. For example, federal programs to support refugees in their initial settlement phase may expand their support resources to include English language training, and actively connecting the new immigrants with local ethnic support groups. In addition, providing services such as, translation services at health care settings and legal aid to immigrants are an essential. Thus, it is necessary to understand the diverse stressors and social resources and their relationship to mental health among different Asian American sub-groups. Increased understanding will allow for the development of more effective and culturally appropriate interventions and will contribute to policy-making.
References
Hoeffel EM, et al. The Asian Population: 2010. US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau; 2012.
Escobar J, Vega W. Mental health and immigration’s AAAs: where are we and where do we go from here? J Nerv Ment Dis. 2000;188(11):736.
Berry JW. Acculturation: living successfully in two cultures. Int J Intercul Relat. 2005;29(6):697–712.
Hwang W, et al. Age of first onset major depression in Chinese Americans. Cult Divers Ethn Minority Psychol. 2005;11(1):16.
Hwang W, Myers H. Major depression in Chinese Americans. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007;42(3):189–97.
Chu JP, Sue S. Asian American mental health: what we know and what we don’t know. Online Read Psychol Cult. 2011;3(1):4.
Okazaki S. Asian American and White American differences on affective distress symptoms: Do symptom reports differ across reporting methods? J Cross Cult Psychol. 2000;31(5):603–25.
Ibrahim F, Ohnishi H, Sandhu DS. Asian American identity development: a culture specific model for South Asian Americans. J Multicult Couns Dev. 1997;25(1):34–50.
Sue S, Chu JY. The mental health of ethnic minority groups: challenges posed by the supplement to the Surgeon General’s report on mental health. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2003;27(4):447–65.
Frisbie WP, Cho Y, Hummer RA. Immigration and the health of Asian and Pacific Islander adults in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153(4):372.
Takeuchi DT, Alegria M, Jackson JS. Immigration and mental health: diverse findings in Asian, Black, and Latino Populations. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(1):11–2.
Crockett LJ, et al. Acculturative stress, social support, and coping: relations to psychological adjustment among Mexican American college students. Cult Divers Ethn Minority Psychol. 2007;13(4):347–55.
Lazarus R, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer; 1984.
Lee J-S, Koeske GF, Sales E. Social support buffering of acculturative stress: a study of mental health symptoms among Korean international students. Int J Intercul Relat. 2004;28(5):399–414.
Beckerman NL, Corbett L. Immigration and families: treating acculturative stress from a systemic framework. Fam Ther. 2008;35(2):63–81.
Walker RL, et al. An empirical investigation of acculturative stress and ethnic identity as moderators for depression and suicidal ideation in college students. Cult Divers Ethn Minority Psychol. 2008;14(1):75–82.
Williams CL, Berry JW. Primary prevention of acculturative stress among refugees: application of psychological theory and practice. Am Psychol. 1991;46(6):632–41.
Chae DS, et al. Unfair treatment, racial/ethnic discrimination, ethnic identification, and smoking among Asian Americans in the National Latino and Asian American Study. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(3):485.
Finch BK, et al. The role of discrimination and acculturative stress in the physical health of Mexican-origin adults. Hisp J Behav Sci. 2001;23(4):399–429.
Gee GC, et al. The association between self-reported racial discrimination and 12-month DSM-IV mental disorders among Asian Americans nationwide. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(10):1984–96.
Noh S, Kasper V. Perceived discrimination and depression: moderating effects of coping, acculturation, and ethnic support. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(2):232–9.
Samuel N, Violet K, Wickrama KAS. Overt and subtle racial discrimination and mental health: preliminary findings for Korean immigrants. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(7):1269.
Christine JY, Mayuko I. International students’ reported English fluency, social support satisfaction, and social connectedness as predictors of acculturative stress. Couns Psychol Q. 2003;16(1):15.
Diwan S. Limited english proficiency, social network characteristics, and depressive symptoms among older immigrants. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2008;36B(3):S184–91.
Salant T, Lauderdale DS. Measuring culture: a critical review of acculturation and health in Asian immigrant populations. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(1):71–90.
Mirsky J. Mental health implications of migration: a review of mental health community studies on Russian-speaking immigrants in Israel. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009;44(3):179–87.
Mallinckrodt B, Leong F. International graduate students, stress, and social support. J Coll Stud Dev. 1992;33(1):71–8.
Heaney CA, et al. Social networks and social support, in health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. In: Anonymous, editor. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco; 2002. p. 185–209.
Barrera M, Social support research in community psychology. Handbook of community psychology, 2000. p. 215‚ Äì245.
Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98(2):310–57.
Cohen SL Underwood, and B. Gottlieb, social support measurement and intervention: a guide for health and social scientists. In: Anonymous, editor. Oxford University Press: USA; 2000.
Kawachi I, Berkman L. Social ties and mental health. J Urban Health. 2001;78(3):458–67.
Vega WA, et al. Lifetime prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders among urban and rural Mexican Americans in California. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55:771–8.
Yoshikawa H, et al. Do family and friendship networks protect against the influence of discrimination on mental health and HIV risk among Asian and Pacific Islander Gay Men? AIDS Educ Prev. 2004;16(1):84–100.
Zhang W, Ta V. Social connections, immigration-related factors, and self-rated physical and mental health among Asian Americans. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68(12):2104.
Mulvaney-Day NE, Alegria M, Sribney W. Social cohesion, social support, and health among Latinos in the United States. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(2):477–95.
Takizawa T, et al. ‘Stress buffering effects of social support on depressive symptoms in middle age: reciprocity and community mental health’: corrigendum. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007;61(3):336–7.
Kim H, McKenry P. Social networks and support: a comparison of African Americans, Asian Americans, Caucasians, and Hispanics. J Comp Fam Stud. 1998;29(2):313–334.
Kramer EJ, et al. Cultural factors influencing the mental health of Asian Americans. West J Med. 2002;176(4):227.
Yeung A, Kung WW. How culture impacts on the treatment of mental illnesses among Asian-Americans. Psychiatric Times. 2004;21(1):34–6.
Alegria M, et al. Considering context, place and culture: the National Latino and Asian American Study. Int J Methods Psychiatric Res. 2004;13(4):208–20.
Heeringa S, et al. Sample designs and sampling methods for the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Studies (CPES). Int J Methods Psychiatric Res. 2004;13(4):221–40.
Heeringa S. Technical Sample Design Documentation 2002–2003 National Latino and Asian American Study (NLAAS). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2004.
Pennell BE, et al. The development and implementation of the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, the National Survey of American Life, and the National Latino and Asian American Survey. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2004;13(4):241–69.
Takeuchi DT, Zane N, Hong S. Immigration-related factors and mental disorders among Asian Americans. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(1):84–90.
Kessler RC, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. 2002;32(6):959–76.
Cervantes R, Padilla A, de Snyder N. The hispanic stress inventory: a culturally relevant approach to psychosocial assessment. Psychol Assess. 1991;3(3):438–47.
Gee GC, et al. Social support as a buffer for perceived unfair treatment among Filipino Americans: differences between San Francisco and Honolulu. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(4):677.
Krieger N. Embodying inequality: a review of concepts, measures, and methods for studying health consequences of discrimination. Int J Health Serv. 1999;29(2):295–352.
Williams DR, Neighbors HW, Jackson JS. Racial/ethnic discrimination and health: findings from community studies. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:200–8.
USDHHS. Mental Health: Culture, Race, and Ethnicity-A Supplement to Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General-Executive Summary, US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General; 2001.
Cho Y, et al. Nativity, duration of residence, and the health of Hispanic adults in the United States. Int Migrat Rev. 2004;38(1):184–211.
Gellis ZD. Kin and Nonkin social supports in a community sample of Vietnamese immigrants. Soc Work. 2003;48(2):248–58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, S., McBride, K. & Kak, V. Role of Social Support in Examining Acculturative Stress and Psychological Distress Among Asian American Immigrants and Three Sub-groups: Results from NLAAS. J Immigrant Minority Health 17, 1597–1606 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-015-0213-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-015-0213-1