Introduction

In recent years, fluorescent molecular sensors for the detection of various metal ions have been an extensive area of research due to several advantages over other techniques [1,2,3]. A large portion of the metal ions assuming a significant role in an assortment of industrial tasks like food, drug, paper, material, water treatment, assembling of batteries, and electronic field [4,5,6]. Fluorescence technology was broadly improved from the year 1960s and there has been sensational development in the utilization of fluorescence for cell and atomic imaging that can be seen today in various disciplines. In particular, Schiff bases have excellent coordination environment, which makes them more convenient to be used as a fluorescent probe for the detection of metal ions [7,8,9]. Schiff base subsidiaries containing nitrogen–oxygen-rich coordination as a receptor site pave an effective medium for fluorescent detection with observable color change [10,11,12].

Zinc is perhaps the most flexible and essential metal with diverse biological functions like cistron transcription, brain performance, pathology, immune perform, and cell replica [13,14,15]. Thus, hereditary irregularities prompting the misregulation in the activities of zinc metal may cause various sicknesses like cerebral ischemia, amyotrophic sidelong sclerosis (ALS), Parkinson's illness, and epilepsy [16]. Because of the absence of spectroscopic marks of Zn2+, it involves incredible significance to create productive recognizing and observing techniques for Zn2+ [17]. Fluorescence based recognition is an amazing asset to identify Zn2+ due to its high affectability and quick reaction. To date, the number of chemosensors for Zn2+ has been developed, but a few of them actually experience issues in distinctive Zn2+ from other metals. Therefore, it is desirable to develop a method for monitoring and detecting Zn2+, which would offer a promising approach to study its actions in biological, medical, and environmental circumstances [18].

Cobalt is an essential trace element that is actively involved in the development of vitamin B12 which is also found in specific minerals of the earth's crust [19, 20]. Although a variety of methods, such as atomic absorption spectroscopy [21, 22] chemiluminescence [23, 24], and ICP mass spectrometry [25,26,27], are widely used to detect cobalt ions, they have disadvantages because of high-cost technic. Hence, the interest for techniques that are straightforward and particular to distinguish cobalt particles is persistently expanding. Among these recognition strategies, a colorimetric technique for the location of metal particles is very much needful. With recent development in technology, the invention of a new small molecular systems as a probe in different forms are developing as an important colorimetric receptors for metal ions [28, 29]. Also, the visual sensing of Co2+ over a wide range of transition metal ions using imidazole cored Schiff base is an important method of detection which allows a direct analysis of the substrate [30].

At hand, for these reasons, we report the design, synthesis and spectroscopic characterizations of a novel imidazole bound Schiff base based chemosensor, IMP for selective fluorometric and colorimetric detection of Zn2+ and Co2+ respectively. The unique combination of imidazole and aromatic phenolic moiety with imine as a bridge results in the excellent coordination to metal ions by providing the dual property of the sensor. Until now, there are no reports on imidazole bound Schiff base sensor can successfully distinguish Zn2+ and Co2+ by turn-on fluorescence and visual effect. Moreover, it would quantify Zn2+ in the water sample appreciated the efficacy of the probe.

Experimental

Reagents and Equipment’s

All the solvents (analytical and spectroscopic grade) were retrieved commercially. All the needed chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The stock solutions of various metal ions were prepared from Zn(OAc)2·H2O, NaCl, KCl, SrCl2.6H2O, InCl3, MnCl2, Cu(OAc)2, Co(OAc)2·H2O, Hg(OAc)2, NiCl2·6H2O, Pb(OAc)2·H2O, FeCl2.4H2O, FeCl3, Mg(OAc)2·4H2O and Cd(OAc)2·H2O. The melting point of the synthesized probe was analyzed by an electrical heating method using capillary tubes.

Absorption spectra were recorded at room temperature using Thermo Scientific™ Evolution 201 UV–visible Spectrophotometer. FT-IR spectrum was worked on JASCO-8000 FT-IR spectrophotometer using KBr pellets in the range of 400–4000 cm−1. Elemental analysis of probe was done using an ElementarVario EL III CHN analyzer at Sophisticated Test and Instrumentation Centre (SAIF), Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, India. 1H (400 MHz) and 13C NMR (100 MHz) spectra were recorded in DMSO-d6 as the solvent on a Burker Advance DRX 300 FT-NMR spectrometer with TMS as the internal standard. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) was worked on a Waters 3100 Mass Detector using ESI–MS technique at Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, India. Fluorescence measurements were performed on a Horiba Fluorolog3 FL-1057 model fluorescence spectrometer.

Synthesis of IMP

(2-[(1H-imidazole-2-ylmethylene)-amino]-4-methyl-phenol)

A solution of Imidazole-2-carboxaldehyde (0.20 g, 2 mmol) in methanol was added slowly to a solution of 2-amino-p-cresol (0.25 g, 2 mmol) in methanol. The reaction mixture was blended for 8 h at 60 °C. The resulting light yellow colored solution was allowed to evaporate at room temperature. Anhydrous ether was added to deposit a yellowish precipitate. The precipitate obtained was washed several times with methanol which was then recrystallized from DMF and then dried in vacuo over anhydrous CaCl2. The purity of the compound was tested with TLC (Hexane:Methanol 10:1). The yield: 0.29 g (81%), m.p. 115 °C (Scheme 1). UV–vis: λmax 294, 362 nm. FT-IR: 3300 cm−1OH), 3020 cm−1NH), 1624 cm−1C=N of imine), 1589 cm−1C=N of imidazole). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C): δ = 12.62 (s, 1H), 9.78 (s, 1H), 7.80, 7.72 (dd, 2H), 7.26 (s, 1H), 6.84, 6.75 (d, 1H), 6.51, 6.49 (d, 1H), 2.50 (s, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 25 °C); δ = 162.88, 148.20, 138.25, 136.46, 131.80, 128.38, 124.51, 122.48, 122.10, 117.81, 20.98 ppm. LC–MS: m/z calcd for C11H11N3O—H+: 200.40; found 200.04. CHN analysis calcd (%) for C11H11N3O (201.09): C, 64.98; H, 5.01; N, 21.23; O, 7.35; found: C, 64.78; H, 5 0.12; N, 20.98; O, 7.15.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Synthesis of IMP

Analytical Procedure

Fluorescence Titration of IMP with Zn2+

Probe IMP (96 mg, 1 mmol) was dissolved in 1:9, v/v 0.01 M H2O-DMF, pH 7 (5 ml). Zn(OAc)2·H2O (1 mmol) was dissolved in 1:9, v/v 0.01 M H2O-DMF, pH 7 (5 mL). Taking 2 mL from each solution and mixing them for a few seconds, fluorescence spectra were taken at room temperature.

UV–visible Titration of IMP with Zn2+

Probe IMP (96 mg, 1 mmol) and Zn(OAc)2·H2O (1 mmol) were dissolved in DMF solution (5 mL). 0.5–5 µL of the prepared solution was carried for took UV–vis absorption spectra at room temperature.

Job’s Plot Measurement of Zn2+

Probe IMP (1 mmol) was dissolved in 1:9, v/v 0.01 M H2O-DMF, pH 7 (5 mL).PreparedZn(OAc)2·H2O (1 mmol) solution in 1:9, v/v 0.01 M H2O-DMF, pH 7 (5 mL). 30–170 µL of the analyte solutions were taken and added probe solutions were until it contains 200 µL in each vial. Each vial was then diluted with DMF to make a total volume of 3 mL. Shaken well the solutions for a few minutes, fluorescence spectra were taken at room temperature.

Detection of Zn2+ with IMP—Competition Experiment.

Stock solutions for various metal ions (Cu2+, Fe2+, Fe3+, Ni2+, Co2+, Mg2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Na+, K+, In3+, Sr2+, Mn2+, Hg2+ and Pb2+ were prepared with a 1.0 × 10−3 M concentration using metal anions in deionized water, and the pH was 6.45. The solution of the probe IMP was prepared with a concentration of 1.0 × 10−3 M in DMF, and the pH of the solution was nearly 7.

Quantum Yield Measurement

Quantum yield (QY) is defined as the efficiency of converting absorbed light into emitted light, which can be in the form of fluorescence. The QY of IMP and IMP-Zn2+ was measured by a comparative fluorescence method using Rhodamine B in 1 × 10–3 M DMF as the standard (std) solution (QYstd = 0.97 at an excitation wavelength of 414 nm, nstd = 1.36). The QY of probe and complex were calculated by Eq. (1).

$$QY Sample=QYreference\times \frac{ms}{mr}\times \left[\frac{\eta s}{\eta r}\right]2$$
(1)

Where \(ms\), \(mr\), \(\eta s\), and \(\eta r\) represent slope and refractive index of the solvent of sample and reference which is measured by fluorescence spectrophotometer, respectively.

Calculation of the Binding Association Constant for IMP-Zn2+ Complex

The association constant (Ka) was calculated using the Benesi-Hildebrand plot (or a double-reciprocal plot) as shown in Eq. (2).

$$\frac{1}{I-I0}=\frac{1}{Ka}x \left(Imax-I0\right) x [Zn2+]+\frac{1}{Imax-I0}$$
(2)

where; I is the experimentally measured fluorescence intensity, I0 is the fluorescence intensity of probe IMP alone, and Imax is the saturated fluorescence intensity of the IMP- Zn2+ complex.

Quantification of Zn2+ in Real Samples

The application study of probe IMP has been done in two different kinds of water samples collected from our home. The fluorescent analysis was carried out by adding 50 µL (1 mmol) of probe IMP to a 3 mL real sample solution having Zn2+. Solutions were blended for about 10 min at 25 °C. Their fluorescence spectra were obtained.

Colorimetric Chemosensor

Naked Eye and UV–vis Detection of Co2+

Receptor IMP (96 mg, 1 mmol) was dissolved in a set of polar and non-polar solvents (2 mL) and 20 µL of the receptor IMP was mixed with 20 µL of Co(OAc)2·H2O solution in DMF. After few seconds, UV–visible absorption spectra were taken at room temperature.

Job’s Plot Measurement of Co2+

Receptor IMP (96 mg, 1 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (2 mL). Added 30–170 µL of the analyte solutions into receptor solutions taken in each cuvet by made up to a total of 200 µL volume. DMF was poured to mark up to 3 mL volume of the total solution. After shaking the solutions, UV–visible absorption spectra were recorded at room temperature.

Detection of Co2+ with IMP—Competition Experiment.

For the color change analysis, UV–visible spectra were recorded. The colorimetric detection of various metal ions was carried out at room temperature using 1 mL volume of each metal ion solution of a 1.0 × 10−3 M concentration and 1 mL of the Schiff base ligand (1.0 × 10−3 M), and the solution mixture was diluted to 10 mL by adding the DMF solvent. The pH of the solution mixture was 7.25. After mixing properly, the UV–visible spectra of the mixtures were recorded.

Calculation of the binding association constant for IMP-Co2+ complex

The association constant (Ka) was calculated using the Benesi-Hildebrand plot (or a double-reciprocal plot) as shown in Eq. (3).

$$\frac{1}{A-A0}=\frac{1}{Ka}x \left(Amax-A0\right) x [Co2+]+\frac{1}{Amax-A0}$$
(3)

Where; A is the experimentally measured absorbance intensity, A0 is the absorbance intensity of probe IMP alone, and Amax is the saturated absorbance intensity of the IMP- Co2+ complex.

Results and Discussion

We synthesized the new imidazole bound system as a sensor molecule IMP by following the general route of bonding a hetero aromatic aldehyde to an aromatic cresol and characterized by CHN analysis, UV–visible, FT-IR, elemental analysis, LC–MS and 1H and 13C NMR techniques.

Spectral Characterizations

The elemental concentrations of carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen in the synthesized ligand were determined using CHN analysis. The results indicate that the synthesized compound is analytically pure and is in good agreement with the proposed chemical formula. The electronic spectral investigations were carried out in 1.0 × 10–5 M DMF solution of ligand in the range of 200–800 nm. The spectral assignments for electronic transitions in ligand and peaks attributed to starting materials lying in the region of 200–260 nm and 200–300 nm for aldehyde and amine respectively. As per the spectra, a new peak is formed in the region of 350–370 nm indicated the presence of the imine group. The two absorption maxima corresponding to two intra ligand transitions: a weak peak and a strong peak at 294 nm and 362 nm. Low energy band is due to n → π* on -HC = N- group which is characteristic of the Schiff base [31]. The high energy band can be attributed to the π → π* transitions on imidazole and phenol aromatic rings [32]. The important bands observed in the IR spectrum of the ligand along with their functional group assignments as per the literature data of similar compounds and the four characteristic peaks around 3300 cm−1, 3020 cm−1, 1624 cm−1and 1589 cm−1 were registered as vibrational modes of O–H stretching, N–H stretching, C = N of newly formed imine and C = N of aromatic imidazole ring [33, 34]. Mass spectrometry was performed on the IMP ligand to determine its molecular weight and fragmentation pattern. The molecular ion peak [M-1]+ was observed at m/e 200.4, confirming the formula weight (F.W.) which is the same as the calculated M+ value. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectrum of the IMP indicated the proof for ligand formation. Singlet in the region of 2.50 ppm is due to the presence of methyl protons. The presence of singlet at 9.78 ppm is caused due to the presence of imine H. Another downfield singlet discernible at around δ 12.63 was allotted to NH proton. The fairly higher downfield effect on NH proton owed to strong intramolecular H bonding. The remaining protons of aromatic moieties were present in the form of singlet and doublets at δ 6.49–7.80 ppm [35]. The proton decoupled 13C NMR spectrum provides direct information about the carbon skeleton of the molecule. Signals around 122 and 136 ppm corresponds to carbons of the imidazole ring. Aromatic carbons of phenol ring resonate between 117–140 ppm. A high value near 162 ppm is due to the presence of imine carbon. Carbon attached to OH resonates at 148 ppm. The methyl group in phenol resonates at 20 ppm [36].

Optical Response of IMP Towards Zn2+

The ligand IMP contains imidazole moiety is frequently found as an indispensable piece of a fluorophore which gives oxygen to metal coordination and an acidic proton which could be lost open metal chelation to frame a monoanionic compound. Also, the lone pairs on imine nitrogen and solitary sets on imidazole nitrogen have been adding to develop a steady metal complex by clung to the empty d orbital of metals. The underlying visibility and substance properties are anticipated to prompt metal particle holding qualities not quite the same as the noticed for the beginning materials. Then, we inspected the UV–visible titration for IMP by adding traces of Zn2+ metal solution in DMF. At the point when the sensor IMP was titrated with Zn2+, there seen a bathochromic shift in the frequency range, 410–430 nm with higher absorption maxima even at lower concentrations of the analyte. Additionally, the peaks at 294 nm and 364 nm for the IMP ligand were dense together to form a new peak in the area of 340–350 nm for the metal complex (Fig. 1). The new peak formed thus confirmed the clean conversion of IMP to IMP-Zn2+ complex.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A comparative UV–visible spectra of IMP and IMP-Zn2+

The photophysical properties and sensing behavior of the ligand IMP were investigated using UV absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy. First, the UV–vis spectrum of the ligand IMP (1 × 10–3 M) was recorded in DMF. IMP exhibited two absorbance peaks at 294 and 364 nm corresponding to the π – π * and n – π * transitions, respectively. Also, the fluorescence emission spectra of IMP were measured in DMF (1 × 10–3 M) and the emission peak was observed at 474 nm for IMP. The ligand exhibited excellent absorption and fluorescent characteristics are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Combined spectra of IMP, a UV–visible spectrum of IMP, b Fluorescence spectrum of IMP

Upon the addition of Zn2+ ions to IMP in DMF, attractive change has been noticed (Fig. 3), where the fluorescent intensity peaks for ligand would disappear and a new peak with enormous fluorescent enhancement is observed at 612 nm. Since the ligand is non-fluorescent showed a fluorescent intensive peak around the region 474 nm. The complete disappearance of peak obtained for IMP alone in IMP-Zn2+ complex confirmed the chelation power of metal towards the active site of the ligand.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Combined fluorescence spectra of ligand IMP and IMP + Zn2+

We have investigated the concentration of ligand IMP to attain sensitivity. A graph was plotted on the concentration of IMP with a difference in fluorescence intensity, (I-I0)/I0, where I0 is the fluorescence intensity of probe alone and I is the fluorescence intensity of probe with an analyte. In Fig. 4, there was a sharp increase in intensity on increasing the concentration of probe but reached a maximum value at 5 × 10–8 M and becomes constant. Hence we used the same for further studies.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of concentration of IMP on fluorescence change of the system

The QY graphs are plotted against absorbance versus fluorescence intensity for IMP alone (Fig. 5) and IMP-Zn2+ (Fig. 6). From the QY calculations (Eq. 1), the fluorescence quantum yields of probe IMP in the free and Zn2+ bound state were found to be 0.0093 and 0.7873 respectively. However, probe with Zn2+ with quantum yields higher than 0.1 is still considered quite fluorescent and IMP with quantum yield lesser than 0.1 is considered as non-fluorescent [37].

Fig. 5
figure 5

QY graph of ligand IMP

Fig. 6
figure 6

QY graph of IMP + Zn2+

A job’s plot was drawn by taking the concentration of analytes on x-axis and fluorescence intensity corresponds to the analyte in y-axis showed the 1:2 binding between analyte Zn2+ and the probe IMP (Fig. 7). Further characterization of IMP-Zn2+ complex was done by CHN analysis. calcd (%): C, 57.89; H, 5.67; N, 16.88; O, 6.43. This might be a piece of evidence for the 1:2 molar complexation of the probe with an analyte.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Job’s plot of IMP and Zn2+

Change in fluorescence intensity with time was studied by illuminating the probe solution in the absence and presence of Zn2+ respectively. The IMP solution gave a stable fluorescence signal up to 21 min. Upon addition of Zn2+, the fluorescence intensity of the probe enhanced with much more photostability which eliminates the time -consuming incubation step disposes by many of the existing methods for real samples (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Effect of time on IMP and IMP-Zn2+

Execution of the Sensor

Effect of Concentration

On expanding the centralization of Zn2+, a consistent expansion in the intensity just as an adjustment of the shape of the fluorescence signal was noticed (Fig. 9). A calibration graph was plotted with a concentration of Zn2+ against I/I0, and it was found to be linear in the range 5 × 10−8 to 5 × 10−7 M (inset of Fig. 9). The limit of detection and limit of quantification was calculated using equations ‘3S/ m’ and ‘10S/ m’, where ‘S' was the standard deviation and ‘m’ was the slope of the calibration graph. The limit of detection and limit of quantification was found to be 6.78 × 10–9 M and 2.26 × 10–8 M respectively. In the presence of Zn2+, the probe IMP shows selective chelation enhanced fluorescence (CHEF) [38, 39]. The upgrade in fluorescence spectra in this manner force inflexibility and consequently decline the nonradiative decay of the energized state. In out range focus, the intensity of IMP isn't change due to the zinc particle uncomplexed.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Effect of concentration of Zn2+ on the fluorescence intensity of IMP and inset represents linear calibration graph between the ratio of fluorescence intensities and concentrations of Zn2+

The binding association constant (Ka) was graphically evaluated by plotting 1/(I-I0) versus 1/[Zn2+], as shown in Fig. 10. From the linear relationship graph, the Ka value calculated from Eq. (2) was 3.96 × 106 M−1.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Linear representation of binding constant for IMP-Zn2+ complex

Effect of pH

To find out whether the probe IMP is stable at acidic or basic pH conditions, we need to take the fluorescence spectra in the pH range 1–10 (Fig. 11). From which, we have remarked that the highest fluorescent intensity was observed at pH 7 indicated the stability of probe in basis buffer. Hence, we did further experiments in the same buffer solution.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Effect of pH on IMP

Mechanism of Zn2+ Detection

The probe, IMP alone could act as a non-fluorescent system and becomes highly fluorescent upon binding with Zn2+ ions due to the formation of a rigid system. We have been attempted to be rationalized on the basis of PET mechanism, which is a commonly used strategy for metal sensing fluorosensors showing intensity enhancement in the presence of suitable metal ions. The enhanced fluorescence in our system is a consequence of combined effects of chelation-enhanced fluorescence (CHEF), C = N isomerization, and inhibition of photo-induced electron transfer (PET). In order to substantiate it, the quantum yield values for IMP before and after binding have been undertaken [40].Scheme 2 Proposed binding mechanism of IMP with Zn2+Scheme 2 Proposed binding mechanism of IMP with Zn2+Scheme 2 Proposed binding mechanism of IMP with Zn2+

Scheme 2
scheme 2

Proposed binding mechanism of IMP with Zn2+

Selectivity and Interference Studies

Perhaps the main property of a sensor are its selectivity. To contemplate the selectivity of the test, various species (1 × 10−5 M) that are either primarily comparable or coinciding or the same grouped metal ions were taken and their effect on fluorescence intensity of IMP was noticed. The fluorescent enhancement in the spectra is not seen for other metal ions such as Cu2+, Fe2+, Fe3+, Ni2+, Co2+, Mg2+, Cd2+, Na+, K+, In3+, Sr2+, Mn2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+. The selectivity of the probe towards Zn2+ is shown in Fig. 12. Hence the sensor should be an ideal probe for zinc-containing samples while the sample has metals of a similar group. Noting the selective fluorescence enhancement due to Zn2+, metal ions were tested for their ability to inhibit the fluorescence of the IMP-Zn2+ complex. The metal ions selected for interference studies were Cu2+, Fe2+, Fe3+, Ni2+, Co2+, Mg2+, Cd2+, Na+, K+, In3+, Sr2+, Mn2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+. The intensity of the peak of IMP with Zn2+ had no effect upon addition with metal ions except for Fe3+, Hg2+, Cu2+, and Cd2+ (Fig. 13). The later metal ions might interfere with the peak intensity with a signal change of 5%. Meanwhile, upon adding more equivalents of metal ions (1:5, 1:10, etc.), the fluorescent intensity peaks get lowered with significant interference.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Fluorescent intensity of IMP in DMF due to 1 equi. of metal ion. The fluorescence due to Zn2+ is shown as a new peak and fluorescence due to other metal ions and IMP are the baseline curves

Fig. 13
figure 13

Interference fluorescence of IMP-Zn2+ complex in the presence of various metal ions

It was found that the probe IMP exhibits an off–on-type mode with high selectivity in the presence of Zn2+ ions. The fluorescence spectra results revealed that the fluorescence emission intensity of probe IMP decreased dramatically on complex formation and the Zn2+ complexes showed high emission maxima. In addition, the examination of the characteristics of the IMP sensor with those of the recently announced Zn2+ sensor is organized in Table 1.

Table 1 Comparison of the characteristics of the IMP sensor with those of the previously reported Zn2+ sensor

Colorimetric Chemosensor

During the fluorescence investigation of detecting Zn2+ in DMF, we noticed the color changes of IMP within the sight of Co2+ ion instead of some other metals. Consequently, we inspected the chromogenic detecting capacity of IMP within the sight of an assortment of metal particles like Cu2+, Fe2+, Ni2+, Co2+, Mg2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Na+, K+, In3+, Sr2+, Mn2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ in DMF. The receptor IMP showed prompt color changes from dull to pink in the presence of Co2+ and a very low yellow intense in presence of Zn2+ which was purposefully omitted. While different metals caused no adjustment of color (Fig. 14).

Fig. 14
figure 14

Color of IMP upon addition of various metal ions

However, the receptor IMP was miscible completely in DMF and other organic solvents. Even there seen partial miscibility in presence of highly polar water solvent with low-intensity peak assigned for n → π* transition which was inferred from the UV–visible spectrum (Fig. 15). All other solvents do not cause any change in the absorption spectrum of IMP since it has two peaks in the region of 312 nm and 358 nm as weak and strong peaks respectively. So the need for solvent effect in the UV–visible spectra of IMP with Co2+is mandatory. Upon adding Co2+, a new peak was formed at 474 nm indicated the transfer of free ligand into the metal complex. Even though, DMF is the best solvent for the complexation of receptor IMP with Co2+ ion with an enhancement in the absorption intensity at 460 nm was cleared from Fig. 16. Hence we continued the studies in DMF and not with buffer solutions. The UV–visible spectra changes of IMP and IMP-Co2+ was shown in Fig. 17.

Fig. 15
figure 15

UV–visible spectrum of IMP in various solvents

Fig. 16
figure 16

UV–visible spectrum of IMP-Co2+ in various solvents

Fig. 17
figure 17

A comparative UV–visible spectra of IMP and IMP + Co2+

The sensitivity of receptor IMP towards Co2+ was determined. The concentration of receptor IMP was obtained by plotting [IMP] against (A-A0)/A0 (Fig. 18) and it was found to be 5 × 10–8 M where A0 is 0.051 nm. The selectivity of receptor IMP towards various metal ions (Fig. 19) suggested the future scope of the sensor with rapid determination and efficacy. No other metals shown any color change and characteristic peak in the region of 450–475 nm. The new peaks formed in the IMP-Co2+ complex might be attributed to metal to ligand charge transfer (MLCT), which is responsible for the pink color of the solution. Moreover, it is qualified to specify that the receptor IMP could be utilized as a test for the separation of Co2+ from Zn2+ by the naked eye.

Fig. 18
figure 18

Effect of concentration of IMP on absorbance change of the system

Fig. 19
figure 19

UV–visible absorption spectra of IMP in the presence of different metal ions (1:1)

To examine the interference of IMP-Co2+ complex in presence of other competing metal ions such as like Cu2+, Fe2+, Ni2+, Mg2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Na+, K+, In3+, Sr2+, Mn2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+, the UV–visible competitive studies were graphically implemented (Fig. 20). Background of most competing metal ions did not interfere with the naked-eye detection of Co2+ even in one equivalences (1:1) and multiple equivalence (1:10 and 1:50) of other metal ion solutions.

Fig. 20
figure 20

UV–visible absorption spectra of IMP-Co2+ in the presence of different metal ions (1:1)

Next, we need to investigate the time stability of receptor IMP alone and IMP-Co2+ complex in a period of 0–21 min at room temperature (Fig. 21). From the spectra, there should be no change in the characteristic peaks for IMP and IMP-Co2+ as time consumes. Thus it was kept for a long period of time without any reduction in the intensity of spectra, which will lead to the application studies in biological samples in future.

Fig. 21
figure 21

Relative effect of time on IMP and IMP-Co2+

On comparing the incorporation of Co2+, a gradual expansion in the intensity of absorption spectra with some sort of the change in the peaks maxima was identified (Fig. 22). A linear calibration graph was plotted with a concentration of Co2+ against A/A0, where A & A0 are the absorptions of analyte and probe respectively. It was found to be linear in the range 5 × 10–8 to 5 × 10−7 M (inset of Fig. 22). The limit of detection and limit of quantification was found to be 6.74 × 10–9 M and 2.22 × 10–8 M respectively. Imidazole bound sensor system is still unaware for the researchers and our proposed sensor with better detection limit value would definitely detect the Co2+ at the commercial level.

Fig. 22
figure 22

Effect of concentration of Co2+ on the UV–visible absorption spectra of IMP. 10 to 100 µL of (10–5 M) Co2+ solutions were added to receptor IMP and inset represents linear calibration graph between the ratio of UV–visible absorptions and concentrations of Co2+

The binding association constant (Ka) for IMP-Co2+ was graphically evaluated by plotting 1/(A-A0) versus 1/[Co2+], as shown in Fig. 23. From the linear relationship graph, the Ka value calculated from Eq. (3) was 3.50 × 106 M−1.

Fig. 23
figure 23

Linear representation of binding constant for IMP-Co2+ complex

Stoichiometry of the IMP-Co2+ complex was determined by Job’s plot which revealed 1:2 ratio (Fig. 24) might be in good agreement with the analyte Zn2+ discussed above. There is a smooth transformation of receptor IMP into the cobalt complex by effective binding with possible donor atoms in the IMP or supported by the PET mechanism. In short, the comparison of IMP and other reported sensors with analyte Co2+ is presented in Table 2.

Fig. 24
figure 24

Job’s plot of IMP and Co2+ in DMF. Total concentrations of IMP and Co2+ were 200 µL

Table 2 Comparison of the characteristics of the IMP sensor with those of the previously reported Co2+ sensor

We took the absorbance spectra of receptor IMP at various pH conditions (Fig. 25). It is highly stable at alkaline pH conditions and thus, we did further experiments in the same buffer condition.

Fig. 25
figure 25

Effect of pH of IMP on absorbance spectra

Analytical Application of Detection of Zn2+ in Water Samples

To get clear knowledge on the selectivity conduct, its higher selectivity for zinc discovery in this technique, displayed by the mentioned sensor, makes it fantastic for observing zinc particles at following fixations in various water samples. Drinking water and tap water were taken and diluted with a buffered solution in a 25.0 mL volumetric flask. Various measures of Zn2+ ions were added to water tests. The proposed sensor was utilized in request to decide the Zn2+ content thus the calibration technique was applied. The results obtained with the sensor are mentioned in Table 3. It was also found that the accuracy of Zn2+ detection in different water samples gives out way to biological sample quantification [41].

Table 3 Determination of Zn2+ ion in water samples with probe IMP

Conclusion

A new versatile, simple, selective, and efficient imidazole bound Schiff base has been synthesized and characterized. It exhibited a remarkable selectivity and sensitivity towards Zn2+ by fluorescence spectra and for Co2+ by UV–visible spectra over competing for other relevant metal ions. The detection limit of the probe with Zn2+ and Co2+ are far below as compared with other reported sensors. The binding ratios of the probe to M2+ (M2+ = Zn2+, Co2+) are 2:1 and the metal association constants are in the 106 M−1 range. The probe binds to Zn2+ through four nitrogen atoms and does so through the phenolic oxygen. Thus the results reported here provide a novel approach for the simultaneous selective identification of Zn2+ and Co2+ among various metal ions. The attractive properties of this method such as selectivity and rapidness would help us to extend its applications for the determination of Zn2+ ions in water samples.