Abstract
In this paper we provide evidence on the empirical relevance of two notions of inequality aversion that have been explored in the literature: self-centered and non-self-centered inequality aversion. We used a flexible model and designed an experimental survey that allowed us to address jointly both of these notions of inequality aversion and to distinguish their relevance. The survey was administered to a sample of first-year University students in Uruguay. The findings confirm the empirical relevance of both notions of aversion to inequality in a developing country. Most study participants exhibited non-self-centered inequality aversion, while a minority of the individuals in our sample appeared to favor inequality. In general the magnitude of aversion to inequality varied as a function of individuals’ position in the income distribution. self-centered income aversion is influenced by many factors, which is manifested in the fact that the magnitude of its parameters is more heterogeneous in compression to non-self centered aversion. In a minority of individuals, self-centered aversion has zero effect, and they are more willing to pay to reduce non-self-centered inequality. Finally, considering both notions together may help prevent bias in the measurement of inequality aversion.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Amiel, Y., Cowell, F., Gaertner, W.: To be or not to be involved: a questionnaire-experimental view on Harsanyi’s utilitarian ethics. Soc. Choice Welf. 32(2), 253–74 (2009)
Amiel, Y., Bernasconi, M., Cowell, F., Dardanoni, V.: Do we value mobility?. Soc. Choice Welf. 44, 231–255 (2015)
Alesina, A., Giuliano, P: Preferences for redistribution. In: Benhabib, E.J., Jackson, M.O., Bisin, A. (eds.) Handbook of Social Economics, vol. 1A, pp 93–132, The Netherlands, North-Holland (2011)
Alesina, A., Rodrik, D.: Distributive politics and economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109(2), 465–490 (1994)
Alesina, A., Teso, E., Stancheva, S.: Intergenerational mobility and preferences for redistribtion. National bureau of economic research. Working Paper 23027 (2017)
Amiel, Y., Creedy, J., Hurn, S.: Measuring attitudes towards inequality. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics. Vol. 101, Issue 1, Version of Record online:, 17 DEC 2002 (1999)
Aronsson, T., Johansson-Stenman, Olof: Inequality aversion and marginal income taxation. University of Gothenburg Working Paper No. 673 (2016)
Atkinson, A.B.: On the measurement of inequality. J. Econ. Theory 2, 244–63 (1970)
Beshears, J., Choi, J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B.: How Are preferences reveled? national bureau of economic research. Working Paper 13976 (2008)
Bolton, G. E., Ockenfels, A.: A theory of equity, reciprocity and competition. Am. Econ. Rev. 90, 166–193 (2000)
Breza, E., Kaur, S., Shamdasani, Y.: The morale effects of pay inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics 133, 611–663 (2018)
Camerer, C., Fehr, E.: When does “Economic man” dominate social behavior?. Science 311, 47–52 (2006)
Carlsson, F., Daruvala, D., Johansson-Stenman, O.: Are people inequality averse, or just Risk-Averse?. Economica 72(287), 375–396 (2005)
Charness, G., Rabin, M.: Understanding social preferences with simple test. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(3), 817–869 (2002)
Clark, A., D’Ambrosio, C.: Attitudes to income inequality: experimental and survey evidence. IZA Discussion Paper No. 8136 (2014)
Cohn, A., Fehr, E., Maréchal, M.: Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry. Nature, Vol. 516 (2014)
Cruces, G., Perez-Truglia, R., Tetaz, M.: Biased perceptions of income distribution y preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment. J. Public Econ. 98, 100–112 (2013)
Cullen, Z., Perez-Truglia, R.: How Much does your boss make? the effects of salary comparisons. National bureau of economic research. Working Paper Series No 24841 (2018)
Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D., Loayza, N.: What causes violent crime?. Eur. Econ. Rev. 46, 1323–1357 (2002)
Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.M.: A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3), 817–868 (1999)
Fehr, E., Gächter, S.: Fairness and retaliation: the economics of reciprocity. J. Econ. Perspect. 14(3), 159–181 (2000)
Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.M.: Theories of fairness and Reciprocity-Evidence and economic applications. Advances in Economics and Econometrics, Econometric Society Monographs, Eighth World Congress 1, 208–257 (2003)
Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.M.: The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism – experimental evidence and new theories. In: Kolm, S.-C., Ythier, J.M. (eds.) Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, pp 615–691, vol. 1. Elsevier (2006)
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A.: Income and well-being: An empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. J. Public Econ. 89(5-6), 997–1019 (2005)
Gaertner, W., Schokkaert, E.: Empirical social choice: Questionnaire-Experimental studies on distributive justice. Cambridge University Press 28(3), 443–450 (2012)
Harsanyi, John: Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J. Polit. Econ. 63, 309–321 (1955)
Heffetz, O., Frank, R.: Preferences For status: Evidence And Economic Implications. In: Benhabib, A.J., Jackson, M.O., Bisin, A. (eds.) Handbook of Social Economics, Vol. 1A, The Netherlands, North-Holland, pp. 69–91 (2011)
Hirschman, A., Rothschild, M.: The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 87(4), 544–566 (1973)
Hopkins, E.: Inequality, happiness and relative concerns: what actually is their relationship?. J. Econ. Inequal. 6, 351–372 (2008)
Johansson-Stenman, O., Carlsson, F., Daruvala, D.: Measuring future grandparents’ preferences for equality and relative standing. Econ. J. 112 (479), 362–383 (2002)
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263–291 (1979)
Kahneman, D.: Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. In: Frangsmyr, T. [Nobel Foundation] (ed.) Les Prix Nobel: The Nobel Prizes 2002, pp 449–489. The Nobel Foundation, Stockholm (2003)
Kleven, H.J.: How can the Scandinavian tax so much?. J. Econ. Perspect. 28(4), 77–98 (2014)
Kuziemko, I., Norton, M.I., Saez, E., Stantcheva, S.: How elastic are preferences for redistribution? evidence from randomized survey experiments. Am. Econ. Rev. 105(4), 1478–1508 (2015)
Laffont, J.: Regulation and development. Cambridge University Press, 052184018X (2005)
Luttmer, E., Singhal, M.: Tax morale. Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association 28(4), 149–68 (2014)
Pirttilä, J., Uusitalo, R.: Leaky bucket in the real world: estimating inequality aversion using survey data. CESIFO Working Paper No. 2026 (2007)
Ray, D: Development Economics, p 848. Princeton University Press, Hardcover (1998). ISBN:0691017069
Sen, A.: Commodities And Capabilities”. Amsterdam: North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.2307/135247 (1985)
Schildberg-Hörisch, H.: Is the veil of ignorance only a concept about risk? An experiment. J. Public Econ. 94(11-12), 1062–1066 (2010). ISSN 0047-2727
Traub, S., Seidl, C., Schmidt, U.: An experimental study on individual choice, social welfare, and social preferences. Eur. Econ. Rev. 53, 385–400 (2009)
Traub, S., Seidl, C., Schmidt, U., Levati, M.: Friedman, Harsanyi, Rawls, Boulding-or somebody else? An experimental investigation of distributive justice. Social Choice and Welfare 24(2), 283–309 (2005)
Acknowledgements
This document was supported by the Fondo Clemente Estable of Agencia Nacional de Innovación e Investigación (ANII). The design of the experimental questionnaire benefited from valuable comments from Marcelo Bérgolo, Gabriel Burdin, Matías Giaccobasso and Mauricio De Rosa. Previous versions of the document received valuable comments from Robert Frank, Ori Heffetz, Verónica Amarante, Patricio Dalton and Gonzalo Salas. In addition, the authors gratefully acknowledge the suggestions made in the Inequality and Poverty Network Seminar (NIP2017), Las Jornadas Académicas de la FCEA (2018) and in the seminars of the inequality and poverty group of the IECON. Errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burone, S., Leites, M. Self-centered and non-self-centered inequality aversion matter: Evidence from Uruguay based on an experimental survey. J Econ Inequal 19, 265–291 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-021-09479-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-021-09479-6