Abstract
The link between income inequality and progressive taxation has long been considered a fundamental normative foundation for income tax progressivity. This paper furnishes necessary and sufficient conditions on primitives, in terms of the elasticity of income with respect to ability, under which various subclasses of progressive taxes are inequality reducing. The distributional effects of progressive income taxation are decomposed into two conditions on the wage elasticity of income, the tax rate effect and the subsidy effect, each capturing different aspects of the transition between before-tax and after-tax income distributions. The results confer a degree of useful flexibility to the theory, in that they allow the analyst to expand the universe of consumer preferences by suitably restricting the set of marginal-rate progressive taxes. As an illustration of the results’ practical implications, we provide a precise characterization of the subclass of (progressive) taxes that are inequality reducing for the constant elasticity of substitution (CES) and the quasi-linear utility functions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abel, A.B.: Optimal taxation when consumers have endogenous benchmark levels of consumption. Rev. Econ. Stud. 72(1), 21–42 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00322
Alesina, A., Giuliano, P., Bisin, A., Benhabib, J.: Preferences for redistribution. Handbook of Social Economics, North Holland, pp. 93–132 (2011)
Allingham, M.: Inequality and progressive taxation: an example. J. Public Econ. 11(2), 273–274 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(79)90009-4
Alm, J., Sanchez, I., DE Juan, A.: Economic and Noneconomic Factors in Tax Compliance. Kyklos 48(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1995.tb02312.x (1995)
Aronsson, T., Johansson-Stenman, S., Wender, R.: Redistribution through charity and optimal taxation when people are concerned with social status, Umeå Economic Studies, No.919. Umea University (2016)
Auerbach, A.J., Kotlikoff, L.J.: Dynamic fiscal policy. Cambridge University Press, New York (1987)
Berliant, M., Gouveia, M.: Equal sacrifice and incentive compatible income taxation. J. Public Econ. 51(4), 219–240 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(93)90086-9
Blundell, R., French, E., Tetlow, G.: Retirement Incentives and Labor Supply. In: Piggot, J., Woodland, A. (eds.) Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging. 1st edn. chap 8, vol. 1A, pp 458–556. Elsevier (2016)
Bowles, S., Park, Y.: Emulation, inequality, and work hours: Was Thorsten Veblen right? Econ. J. 115(507), F397–F412 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01042.x
Carbonell-Nicolau, O., Llavador, H.: Inequality reducing properties of progressive income tax schedules: The case of endogenous income. Theor. Econ. 13 (1), 39–60 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3982/TE2533
Carbonell-Nicolau, O., Llavador, H.: Inequality, Bipolarization, and Tax Progressivity. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (forthcoming)
Cogan, J.F.: Fixed Costs and Labor Supply. Econometrica 49(4), 945. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912512 (1981)
D’Antoni, M.: Piecewise linear tax functions, progressivity, and the principle of equal sacrifice. Econ. Lett. 65(2), 191–197 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(99)00141-X
Ebert, U., Moyes, P.: Consistent income tax structures when households are heterogeneous. J. Econ. Theory 90(1), 116–150 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1999.2582
Ebert, U., Moyes, P.: The difficulty of income redistribution with labour supply. Econ. Bullet. 8(2), 1–9 (2003)
Ebert, U., Moyes, P.: Income taxation with labor responses. J. Publ. Econ. Theory 9(4), 653–682 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2007.00324.x
Eichhorn, W., Funke, H., Richter, W.: Tax progression and inequality of income distribution. J. Math. Econ. 13(2), 127–131 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4068(84)90012-0
Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.M.: Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity: Evidence and Economic Applications. In: Dewatripont, M., Hansen, L., Turnovsky, S. (eds.) Advances in Economics and Econometrics, Econometric Society Monographs, Eighth World Congress, vol. 1, pp 208–257. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Fellman, J.: The effect of transformations of Lorenz curves. Econometrica 44(4), 823–824 (1976). https://doi.org/10.2307/1913450
Formby, J., James Smith, W., Sykes, D.: Income redistribution and local tax progressivity: a reconsideration. Can. J. Econ. 19(4), 808–811 (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/135328
French, E.: The Effects of Health, Wealth, and Wages on Labour Supply and Retirement Behavior. Rev. Econ. Stud. 72(2), 395–427 (2005)
Greenwood, J., Hercowitz, Z., Huffman, J.: Investment, capacity utilization, and the real business cycle. Amer. Econ. Rev. 78(3), 402–417 (1988)
Heckman, J.J., MaCurdy, T.: Corrigendum on A Life Cycle Model of Female Labour Supply. Rev. Econ. Stud. 49(4), 659. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297295 (1982)
Hemming, R., Keen, M.: Single-crossing conditions in comparisons of tax progressivity. J. Publ. Econ. 20(3), 373–380 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(83)90032-4
Ireland, N.: Optimal income tax in the presence of status effects. J. Publ. Econ. 81(2), 193–212 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-2727(00)00108-0
Jakobsson, U.: On the measurement of the degree of progression. J. Publ. Econ. 5(1–2), 161–168 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(76)90066-9
Ju, B.G., Moreno-Ternero, J.: On the equivalence between progressive taxation and inequality reduction. Soc. Choice Welfare 30(4), 561–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-007-0254-z (2008)
Kakwani, N.: Applications of Lorenz curves in economic analysis. Econometrica 45(3), 719–728 (1977). https://doi.org/10.2307/1911684
Keane, M.P.: Labor Supply and Taxes: A Survey. J. Econ. Liter. 49(4), 961–1075. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.4.961 (2011)
Killingsworth, M.R., Heckman, J.J.: Female labor supply: A survey. In: Ashenfelter, O.C., Layard, R. (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 1, pp 103–204 (1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4463(86)01005-2)
Kleven, H.J.: How Can Scandinavians Tax So Much? J. Econ. Perspect. 28(4), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.4.77 (2014)
Latham, R.: Lorenz-dominating income tax functions. Int. Econ. Rev. 29(1), 185–198 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2307/2526818
Le Breton, M., Moyes, P., Trannoy, A.: Inequality reducing properties of composite taxation. J. Econ. Theory 69(1), 71–103 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1996.0038
Liu, P.W.: Lorenz domination and global tax progressivity. Can. J. Econ. 18(2), 395–399 (1985). https://doi.org/10.2307/135143
Luttmer, E.F.P., Singhal, M.: Tax Morale. J. Econ. Perspect. 28(4), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.4.149 (2014)
Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M.D., Green, J.R.: Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press (1995)
Mirrlees, J.: Exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation. Rev. Econ. Stud. 38, 175–208 (1971). https://doi.org/10.2307/2296779
Mitra, T., Ok, E.: Personal income taxation and the principle of equal sacrifice revisited. Int. Econ. Rev. 37(4), 925–948 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2307/2527317
Mitra, T., Ok, E.: On the equitability of progressive taxation. J. Econ. Theory 73(2), 316–334 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1996.2244
Moyes, P.: Inequality reducing and inequality preserving transformations of incomes: Symmetric and individualistic transformations. J. Econ. Theory 63(2), 271–298 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1994.1043
Moyes, P.: A note on minimally progressive taxation and absolute income inequality. Soc. Choice Welf. 5(2), 227–234 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00735763
Musgrave, R., Thin, T.: Income tax progression, 1929-48. J. Polit. Econ. 56(6), 498–514 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1086/256742
Myles, G.: Public economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139170949.006
Ok, E.: On the principle of equal sacrifice in income taxation. J. Public Econ. 58(3), 453–467 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(94)01481-3
Pencavel, J.: Labor supply of men: A survey. In: Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 1, chap 1, pp. 3–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4463(86)01004-0 (1986)
Saez, E., Slemrod, J., Giertz, S.H.: The elasticity of taxable income with respect to marginal tax rates: a critical review. J. Econ. Lit. 50(1), 3–50 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.1.3
Samuelson, P.: Foundations of Economic Analysis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1947)
Seade, J.: On the sign of the optimum marginal income tax. Rev. Econ. Stud. 49(4), 637–643 (1982). https://doi.org/10.2307/2297292
Slemrod, J.: Methodological issues in measuring and interpreting taxable income elasticities. Natl. Tax J. 51(4), 773–788 (1998)
Slemrod, J., Kopczuk, W.: The optimal elasticity of taxable income. J. Publ. Econ. 84 (1), 91–112 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00095-0
Stern, D.I.: Elasticities of substitution and complementarity. J. Prod. Anal. 36(1), 79–89 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0203-1
Thistle, P.: Uniform progressivity, residual progression, and single-crossing. J. Public Econ. 37 (1), 121–126 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(88)90009-6
Thon, D.: Redistributive properties of progressive taxation. Math. Soc. Sci. 14(2), 185–191 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(87)90021-7
Young, H.: Progressive taxation and equal sacrifice. Amer. Econ. Rev. 80(1), 253–266 (1990)
Acknowledgments
This paper benefited from valuable comments made by the anonymous referees. Llavador acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, through the Severo Ochoa Programme for Centres of Excellence in R&D (CEX2019-000915-S), the AEI/FEDER-UE (PGC2018-096370-B-100) and the AEI/FEDER-EU (ECO2017-89240-P).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carbonell-Nicolau, O., Llavador, H. Elasticity determinants of inequality-reducing income taxation. J Econ Inequal 19, 163–183 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-020-09461-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-020-09461-8