Abstract
Towards further enhancing the conceptual unification of the literature on risk and inequality, we demonstrate that a number of existing inequality indices arise naturally from a Harsanyi-inspired model of choice under risk, whereby individuals act as expected (reference-dependent) utility maximizers in the face of an income quantile lottery. Among other things, our reformulation gives rise to a novel reinterpretation of these classical indices as measures of the desirability of redistribution in society.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atkinson, A.B.: On the measurement of inequality. J. Econ. Theory 2, 244–263 (1970)
Bennett, C.J., Hatzimasoura, C.: Poverty measurement with ordinal data. The George Washington University Institute for International Economic Policy. Working Paper No. 2011-14 (2011)
Chakravarty, S.R.: Extended Gini indices of inequality. Int. Econ. Rev. 29, 147–156 (1988)
Chew, S.H.: A generalization of the quasilinear mean with applications to the measurement of income inequality and decision theory resolving the Allais paradox. Econometrica 51, 1065–1092 (1983)
Donaldson, D., Weymark, J.A.: A single-parameter generalization of the Gini indices of inequality. J. Econ. Theory 22, 67–86 (1980)
Foster, J., Greer, J., Thorbecke, E.: A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica 52(3), 761–765 (1984)
Furman, E., Zitikis, R.: Weighted premium calculation principles. Insur.: Math. Econ. 42, 459–465 (2008)
Furman, E., Zitikis, R.: Weighted risk capital allocations. Insur.: Math. Econ. 43, 263–269 (2008)
Gajdos, T., Kandil, F.: The ignorant observer. Soc. Choice Welf. 31, 193–232 (2008)
Gajdos, T., Weymark, J.A.: Introduction to inequality and risk. J. Econ. Theory 147, 1313–1330 (2012)
Gastwirth, J. L.: A general definition of the Lorenz curve. Econometrica 39, 1037–1039 (1971)
Giorgi, G.-M.: Bibliographic portrait of the Gini concentration ratio. Metron 48, 183–221 (1990)
Giorgi, G.-M.: A fresh look at the topical interest of the Gini concentration ratio. Metron 51, 83–98 (1993)
Harsanyi, J.C.: Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk-taking. J. Polit. Econ. 61, 434–435 (1953)
Harsanyi, J.C.: Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality? A critique of John Rawls’s theory. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 69, 594–606 (1975)
Koszegi, B., Rabin, M.: A model of reference-dependent preferences. Q. J. Econ. 121, 1133–1165 (2006)
Kumaraswamy, P.: A generalized probability density function for double-bounded random processes. J. Hydrol. 46, 79–88 (1980)
Machina, M.: Nonexpected utility theory. In: Teugels, J.L., Sundt, B. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Actuarial Science, pp. 1173–1179. Wiley, New York (2004)
Machina, M.: Non-expected utility theory. In: Durlauf, S.N., Blume, L.E. (eds.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Second Edition, pp. 74–84. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2008)
Mehran, F.: Linear measures of income inequality. Econometrica 44, 805–809 (1976)
Puppe, C.: Distorted probabilities and choice under risk. Springer, Berlin (1991)
Rawls, J.: A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1971)
Rothschild, M., Stiglitz, J.E.: Increasing risk: I. A definition. J. Econ. Theory 2, 225–243 (1970)
Weymark, J.A.: Generalized Gini inequality indices. Math. Soc. Sci. 1, 409–430 (1981)
Weymark, J.A.: John Harsanyi’s contributions to social choice and welfare economics. Soc. Choice Welf. 12, 313–318 (1995)
Weymark, J.A.: John C. H. In: Crimmins, J.E. (ed.) The Bloomsbury Encyclopedia of Utilitarianism, pp. 213–216. Bloomsbury Academic, London and New York (2013)
Yitzhaki, S., Schechtman, E.: The Gini methodology: A primer on a statistical methodology. Springer, New York (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Bates White, or its employees and affiliates.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bennett, C.J., Zitikis, R. Ignorance, lotteries, and measures of economic inequality. J Econ Inequal 13, 309–316 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-015-9302-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-015-9302-6