Abstract
The efficacy of stem-cell therapy depends on the ability of the transplanted cells to escape early immunological reactions and to be retained at the site of transplantation. The use of tissue engineering scaffolds or injectable biomaterials as carriers has been proposed, but they still present limitations linked to a reliable manufacturing process, surgical practice and clinical outcomes. Alginate microbeads are potential candidates for the encapsulation of mesenchymal stromal cells with the aim of providing a delivery carrier suitable for minimally-invasive and scaffold-free transplantation, tissue-adhesive properties and protection from the immune response. However, the formation of stable microbeads relies on the cross-linking of alginate with divalent calcium ions at concentrations that are toxic for the cells, making control over the beads’ size and a single-cell encapsulation unreliable. The present work demonstrates the efficiency of an innovative, high throughput, and reproducible microfluidic system to produce single-cell, calcium-free alginate coatings of human mesenchymal stromal cells. Among the various conditions tested, visible light and confocal microscopy following staining of the cell nuclei by DAPI showed that the microfluidic system yielded an optimal single-cell encapsulation of 2000 cells/min in 2% w/v alginate microcapsules of reproducible morphology and an average size of 28.2 ± 3.7 µm. The adhesive properties of the alginate microcapsules, the viability of the encapsulated cells and their ability to escape the alginate microcapsule were demonstrated by the relatively rapid adherence of the beads onto tissue culture plastic and the cells’ ability to gradually disrupt the microcapsule shell after 24 h and proliferate. To mimic the early inflammatory response upon transplantation, the encapsulated cells were exposed to proliferating macrophages at different cell seeding densities for up to 2 days and the protection effect of the microcapsule on the cells assessed by time-lapse microscopy showing a shielding effect for up to 48 h. This work underscores the potential of microfluidic systems to precisely encapsulate cells by good manufacturing practice standards while favouring cell retention on substrates, viability and proliferation upon transplantation.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been used in clinics for cartilage repair in osteoarthritic conditions and have more recently been proposed as a promising therapeutic intervention for myocardial infarction [1,2,3]. In the case of the treatment of knee osteoarthritis, a total of 23 non-case report studies have been reported. Thirteen of them were designed as randomized controlled studies, although with heterogeneity in source cells, preparation methods, and dosage of MSCs [1]. The single injection dosage ranged from 1.56 × 104 to 1 × 108 cells, and the most wildly proved dosage was 5 × 107 cells [1]. Repeated injections or high dosage showed superiority over single injection or low dosage [4], with mild adverse events being transient arthralgia, swelling of joints after local injection and low back pain which spontaneously relieved within 7 days suggesting an early inflammatory response to the transplanted cells [5, 6].
Myocardial infarction often results in irreversible loss of cardiomyocytes, leading to impaired cardiac function and potentially life-threatening consequences. It has been shown that MScs contribute to myocardial repair through paracrine mechanisms, immunomodulation and anti-inflammatory effects [7]. These unique properties make MSCs an attractive candidate for cell-based therapies aimed at restoring cardiac structure and function post-myocardial infarction.
However, the use of MSCs in clinics is limited by the availability of carriers that are compatible with a minimally-invasive procedure (i.e., injection) and that can enable the cells to be retained at the site of treatment while being protected from the inflammatory environment dominating osteoarthritis and acute myocardial infarcted areas.
In this respect, cell encapsulation within microgels, as opposed to biomaterial scaffolds which are not suitable for injection procedures, has emerged as a transformative approach in various fields, including pharmaceutical research, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine [8,9,10,11,12]. These microgels are suitable for precise manufacturing and serve as discrete 3D microenvironments to preserve the phenotype of the cells and their controlled delivery to the site of transplantation. In particular, the encapsulation of living cells in micrometer-sized alginate particles has gained significant attention due to its potential applications in studying cell behavior, tissue repair, and the development of tissue-mimicking structures [13, 14]. However, to fulfill the therapeutic potential of cell encapsulation within microgels, several challenges must be addressed. These challenges include achieving homogenous network structures within the microgels, controlling particle size and size distribution, and ensuring efficient oxygen and nutrient exchange for encapsulated cells [15,16,17].
Alginate microgel particles are typically produced by emulsification in an aqueous solution of alginate in an oil phase and the consequent crosslinking through ionic bonding with divalent ions like Ca+2. This ionic crosslinking process initiates promptly upon contact between alginate chains and calcium ions. This rapid reaction often leads to uncontrolled gelation which, when applied to advanced manufacturing methods such as microfluidic devices, can result in issues such as channel clogging and nonuniform droplet formation [15, 18]. Previous research tried to address these challenges by separating the droplet formation process and the calcium-driven crosslinking to prevent unintended gelation before droplet formation [19]. This technique is also hindered by two key challenges: (i) the necessary drop in pH for alginate gelation and (ii) the subsequent removal of the oil phase and unreacted calcium ions. These hurdles significantly prolong the process, jeopardizing cell viability and operational efficiencies. To address these issues, the present work aimed at developing a microfluidic system for the single-cell encapsulation of MSCs where aqueous alginate solutions of varying concentrations were integrated with flowing MSC suspensions; the system relying on the ability of the alginate hydroxyl groups to establish immediate hydrogen bonds with the cell glycocalyx upon contact of the two fluids thus eliminating the need for the use of cell-incompatible oil phase and calcium crosslinking.
The properties of the encapsulated cells to adhere on solid surfaces and to be protected from the attack of proliferating monocytes/macrophages within 48 h were studied alongside their ability to escape the capsule and proliferate over time.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 MSCs’ culture
Human bone marrow MSCs (2 donors, male and female, 18- and 25-year-old Lonza, UK) were cultured in a chemically-defined medium (Lonza’s TheraPEAKTM MSCGMTM Mesenchymal Stem Cell Growth Medium). To preserve MSCs stemness, cells were subjected to no more than 2 passages prior to their encapsulation.
2.2 MSCs’ microfluidic encapsulation
An Elveflow (France) microfluidic system was used with precise pressure control to inject fluids in microchannels. The system consisted of a microfluidic controller that generates controlled air pressure applied to the system fluid reservoirs and inlets. All the components of the microfluidic system (i.e., tubing and the microfluidic chip) were disinfected by a 70% v/v ethanol/water flow for 1 h. Air was also filter-sterilized applying 0.2 μm filters sterile at both the alginate and cell suspension tubing inlets. Cells were suspended in the same chemically-defined, serum-free medium used for their culturing at different densities (from 1 x 105 to 1 x 106 cells/ml). Alginate (Alginic acid sodium salt, Mw: 120K–190K Daltons, Sigma Aldrich, UK) water solutions at 1%, 2% and 3% w/v were prepared in sterile conditions. The tube containing the cells was connected to the Darwin Microfluidics DG-DM-60/1.2 mm Droplet Generator (Fig. 1a) and cells in the tube were kept in suspension by gentle stirring with an orbital shaker. Upon application of a constant air pressure of 300mbar, the MSCs were injected from the tube into the microfluidic reservoir that avoids cells aggregation and enables the introduction of single separated cells into the central channel (Fig. 1b, green arrow) where they were exposed to the flow of the alginate aqueous solution injected through the perpendicular channel at a pressure of 400 mbar (Fig. 1b, yellow arrow). The microbead-encapsulated MSCs were collected from the microfluidic chip outlet into a sterile Eppendorf tube and kept in suspension until used for characterization or biological experiments within 30 min.
2.3 Encapsulated MSCs characterization
Single-cell MSCs’ encapsulation was assessed by DAPI staining of the nuclei of the cells immediately after their transfer to a 24-well plate (200 μl of cell suspension/well). The percentages of free and encapsulated cells were quantified by cell counting from 3 different wells and expressed as a percentage of encapsulation.
The diameters of the MSCs encapsulated at different concentrations of alginate were measured and compared to those of control MSCs. The average size of microbeads was determined by measuring the diameter of 30 microparticles by the Image J software. To obtain accurate size measurement, the images were properly calibrated by converting pixels to microns based on the known image scale bar. Data were expressed as mean diameter (μm) standard deviation from n = 30 different samples.
2.4 Microcapsule adhesion to tissue culture plastic and MSC viability
The adhesive properties of the encapsulated cells as well as the MSC’s ability to escape the capsule and maintain their own adhesive properties, viability and proliferation were tested by their seeding at a density of 2 x 105 cells/ml on adherent tissue culture plastic (Falcon, USA) and incubation in the same chemically-defined medium at 37 oC, 95% air 5% CO2, static conditions, over 3 days. The process of cell liberation from microcapsules was monitored by a Lux time-lapse light microscopy (Axion Biosystems, UK) and later by higher magnification light microscopy.
2.5 In vitro model of encapsulated MSCs protection from proliferating inflammatory cells activity
The ability of alginate-encapsulated single MSCs (1 × 105 cells/ml) to preserve their integrity upon an insult by inflammatory cells was assessed by their co-culturing with U937 monocytes/macrophages cell lines (ECACC general cell collection, Cat number 85011440) seeded at different concentration (2 × 105 to 5 × 105 U937/mL) over 2 days. The morphological integrity of the encapsulated cells upon monocytes/macrophages proliferation and activation was qualitatively analysed by time-lapse microscopy.
3 Results
3.1 Optimization of the experimental process
The microfluidic system was optimized considering a range of parameters including chip geometry, applied air pressure, cell number and the concentration of the alginate solution.
The serpentine design of the chip central channel used in this study showed to be particularly advantageous for cell suspension flow as the extended channel length allows for a more gradual change in the flow direction, reducing pressure drop and minimizing the risk of channel blockages by cell aggregation. Likewise, the injection of high cell numbers into the system tend to accumulate cells in the microfluidic reservoir causing its clogging as well as the irregular injection of cells through the central channel thus impacting on the reproducibility of the encapsulation process (Fig. 2a, b). This was not the case when the cell number was reduced (data not shown). To this end, the minimum cell density found to yield a reliable process was 1 × 105 cells/ml. Likewise, among a range of air pressure conditions tested, the ideal channel pressure was determined to be 400 mbar in the alginate channel and 300 mbar in the cell suspension channel.
The optimal alginate concentration was identified as 2% w/v. While 1% w/v alginate solution showed a reduced percentage of encapsulated cells (46%, Fig. 3a), MSC encapsulation in 2% w/v alginate yielded a percentage of encapsulated cells of 63% (Fig. 3b) in 30 min with the most reproducible microcapsule morphology. Experiments performed using 3% w/v alginate resulted in non-reproducible alginate beads probably caused by the more viscous properties of the biopolymer solution (data not shown).
3.2 Size measurements and alginate film thickness
The average size of MSCs encapsulated in 2% w/v alginate was found to be 28.2 µm ± 3.7 whereas the average size of uncoated MSCs was 9.3 µm ± 1.8 (Fig. 4a, b). Thus, in the case of the MSCs encapsulated with 2% w/v alginate the indirect estimate of the coating average thickness was 18.9 µm, while in the case of cells encapsulated with 1% w/v alginate the estimated coating thickness was 5 µm raising concerns about the potentially limited adhesive and immune-protective potential of the coating.
3.3 Encapsulated MSCs adhesive and proliferative properties
When seeded on adherent polystyrene tissue culture plastic, MSCs encapsulated in 2% w/v alginate resulted deposited at the bottom of the well within a few minutes when compared to uncoated cells that remained floating for hours and showed to be static over the incubation time (Fig. 4a, b). The adhesive property of the alginate capsule was confirmed by light microscopy analysis at higher magnification over 3 days of incubation where encapsulated cells were shown to initiate a process of evasion from their alginate microcapsules with the protrusion of filopodia (Fig. 5a, b, arrows) and more established lamellipodia (Fig. 5a, b, arrowhead, Supplementary Material Video 1). Noticeably, the encapsulated MSCs showed to have maintained their proliferative potential as mitotic processes leading to cell division appear to take place from day 3 (Fig. 5a, black arrows, Supplementary Material Video 1).
3.4 Encapsulated MScs interaction with immune cells
Time-lapse microscopy analysis (Fig. 6a–f, Supplementary Material, Video 2) showed the protective effect of the 2% w/v alginate on MSCs when co-cultured with U937 monocyte/macrophage cell lines at different cell seeding densities. Irrespective of their seeding density, the immune cells initiated to attack the encapsulated MSCs approximately 7–8 h after exposure while showing signs of adhesion onto the tissue culture plastic and relatively rapid proliferation (Fig. 6d–f, black arrowheads; Supplementary Material, Video 2, dark large expanding areas observed at the video later stage). These immune cells encircled the encapsulated MSCs that remained structurally stable and intact even after 48 h of exposure and regardless of the initial U937 seeding density. While aiming at mimicking the inflammatory conditions of osteoarthritis or acute myocardial infarction it is important to note that, in terms of inflammatory cell numbers, the in vivo conditions are likely to be milder than those adopted in this in vitro model. Indeed, the normal synovial fluid contains less than 200 leukocytes/ml, whereas in acute phases of inflammatory arthropathies, the leukocyte count significantly increases to 50,000/ml or more [20], which is ten times lower that the cell density used in this study.
4 Discussion
Cell therapy has been advocated as the future alternative to the treatment of tissues damaged by trauma or diseases [21]. Among the various cell phenotype studied as therapeutics, MSC are widely advocated for their multipotency making them able to differentiate in different types of tissue cells as well as to contribute to tissue regeneration by releasing key paracrine factors (e.g. the vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGF) to the tissue cells [22, 23]. However, the translation of this widely accepted therapeutic potential from concepts and pre-clinical studies to clinical applications is restrained by a range of limitations that so far have prevented their approval by the regulatory bodies [23]. From a regenerative point of view, human bone marrow MSC are known to be able to differentiate into three main lineages, adipocytes, chondrocytes and osteoblasts, but their ability to differentiate into nerve cells, glioma cells and skeletal muscle cells has been demonstrated in vitro upon specific culturing conditions [23]. However, those favorable differentiation conditions are not available in the complex microenvironment of a damaged tissue limiting, alongside their well ascertained slow rate of proliferation, their therapeutic potential [21, 23]. To this end, MSC-based therapy has been mainly pursued through strategies that are based either on their genetic manipulation or combination with biomaterial carriers [21, 24]. Among them, alginate, a polysaccharide made of glucuronic and mannuronic acid and found in the cell walls and intracellular spaces of brown seaweed, has been widely studied because of its overall biocompatibility that includes non-toxicity, non-immunity, extracellular matrix biomimetic features and biodegradability [25]. This relatively inexpensive biomaterial also offers relatively low costs of sourcing and suitability for engineering into hydrogels, microspheres, microcapsules, sponges, foams and fibers [26]. These properties make the use of this biomaterial as a carrier for MSC attractive, particularly in those clinical applications where minimally-invasive procedures, the control of cell phenotype and protection in highly inflamed tissue are needed. These include, among others, the treatment of mild/moderate osteoarthritis conditions and myocardial infarction acute phase where a transplantation by localized injection is desirable [27, 28]. MSC therapy for the treatment of osteoarthritic joints based on intra-articular administration as well as for acute myocardial infarction have been studied in several clinical trials showing different outcomes that suggest that the procedure is still far from its optimization and that repeated doses of cells may be required over time [4, 27, 28]. Such an approach rules out the administration of the cells in combination with biomaterial scaffolds unless injectable self-setting formulations are used. While having the potential of providing the cells with a microenvironment adequate for their retention at the site of implantation, viability and phenotype preservation (or differentiation) and protection from inflammatory insults, it is argued that the reproducibility of these procedures may be affected by phase separation upon injections, gelation kinetics, uneven distribution of cells within the construct and lack of control over oxygen, nutrients and catabolites diffusion [29]. Encapsulation of cells in beads such as alginate beads is also prone to drawbacks hindering their use in clinics [30]. These drawbacks include immunogenicity caused by lipopolysaccharide contaminants not efficiently removed during the alginate purification, crosslinking agents that can be toxic to the cell or immunogenic, and the thickness of the capsule that may limit the diffusion or the protection of the cells in the bead core [30]. To this end, the present work has focussed on the ability of producing a highly reproducible, high throughput method of alginate thin-coating deposition at the surface of MSC by the accurate control of a microfluidic device. The data obtained confirmed the research hypothesis that the highly hydrophilic nature of both the alginate and the cell glycocalyx could led to the formation of a thin and stable coating that could limit the size of the beads to a diameter feasible for injection through endoscopy while increasing the cell rapid attachment to surfaces. The use of a microfluidic system with a T-junction and flow-focusing geometry to achieve MSC encapsulation has previously been pursued demonstrating that T-junction coaxial capillary, micro-nozzle cross-flow system, the size of the orifice of the T-junction and biomaterial viscosity all affect the size of the droplets formed [31, 32]. These studies have been focussing on the encapsulation of multiple, not single, MSC in protein-based microcapsule including poly-L-Lysine and methacrylated gelatine that do not have the desired characteristics in terms of specific clinical applications and immunogenic potential [33,34,35]. The choice of a serpentine geometry of the microfluidic chip, the testing of different cell suspension densities and alginate concentrations considered in this study offer a significant step forward to the development of MSC encapsulation protocols that fulfills most of the parameters required for both manufacturing and clinical requirements. Furthermore, the demonstration of the cells to maintain their viability, adhesive properties and proliferation, alongside their protection upon an inflammatory insult, provides further evidence about the potential of this method to be applied to future in vivo and clinical studies.
5 Conclusion
The present study demonstrates the significant potential of employing microfluidic technology for precise MSCs’ single-cell encapsulation process in alginate thin coating that fulfills the standard requirement for advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP). Together with the FDA approval of alginate for medical applications available since the 70 s and the data emerging from clinical studies where this hydrogel has been tested for cardiac applications [36], the present study shows that the speed, scaled and reproducibility of the preparation obtained by a compact microfluidic system, easy to accommodate in a confined space of a clean room or even in a surgery theater, may pave the way towards an alternative, cost- and clinical effective way to apply MSC therapy in the treatment of clinical conditions where minimally-invasive and rapid procedures are advocated.
References
Xiang XN, Zhu SY, He HC, Yu X, Xu Y, He CQ. Mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapy for cartilage regeneration in knee osteoarthritis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022;13:14.
Poomani MS, Mariappan I, Perumal R, Regurajan R, Muthan K, Subramanian V. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) therapy for ischemic heart disease: a promising frontier. Glob Heart. 2022;17:19.
Neybecker P, Henrionnet C, Pape E, Mainard D, Galois L, Loeuille D, et al. In vitro and in vivo potentialities for cartilage repair from human advanced knee osteoarthritis synovial fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9:329.
Matas J, Orrego M, Amenabar D, Infante C, Tapia-Limonchi R, Cadiz MI, et al. Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for knee osteoarthritis: repeated MSC dosing is superior to a single MSC Dose and to hyaluronic acid in a controlled randomized phase I/II trial. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2019;8:215–24.
Pers YM, Rackwitz L, Ferreira R, Pullig O, Delfour C, Barry F, et al. Adipose mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapy for severe osteoarthritis of the knee: a phase I dose-escalation trial. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2016;5:847–56.
Soler R, Orozco L, Munar A, Huguet M, López R, Vives J, et al. Final results of a phase I-II trial using ex vivo expanded autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee confirming safety and suggesting cartilage regeneration. Knee. 2016;23:647–54.
Miao C, Lei M, Hu W, Han S, Wang Q. A brief review: the therapeutic potential of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in myocardial infarction. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8:242.
Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37:106–26.
Tan WH, Takeuchi S. Monodisperse alginate hydrogel microbeads for cell encapsulation. Adv Mater. 2007;19:2696–701.
Martinez CJ, Kim JW, Ye C, Ortiz I, Rowat AC, Marquez M, et al. A microfluidic approach to encapsulate living cells in uniform alginate hydrogel microparticles. Macromol Biosci. 2012;12:946–51.
Sugiura S, Oda T, Izumida Y, Aoyagi Y, Satake M, Ochiai A, et al. Size control of calcium alginate beads containing living cells using micro-nozzle array. Biomaterials. 2005;26:3327–31.
Tumarkin E, Kumacheva E. Microfluidic generation of microgels from synthetic and natural polymers. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38:2161–8.
Wang H, Leeuwenburgh SC, Li Y, Jansen JA. The use of micro-and nanospheres as functional components for bone tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2012;18:24–39.
Rowley JA, Madlambayan G, Mooney DJ. Alginate hydrogels as synthetic extracellular matrix materials. Biomaterials. 1999;20:45–53.
Velasco D, Tumarkin E, Kumacheva E. Microfluidic encapsulation of cells in polymer microgels. Small. 2012;8:1633–42.
Wan J. Microfluidic-based synthesis of hydrogel particles for cell microencapsulation and cell-based drug delivery. Polymers. 2012;4:1084–108.
Huang KS, Lai TH, Lin YC. Using a microfluidic chip and internal gelation reaction for monodisperse calcium alginate microparticles generation. Front Biosci-Landmark. 2007;12:3061–7.
Orive G, Hernández RM, Gascón AR, Calafiore R, Chang TM, Vos PD, et al. Cell encapsulation: promise and progress. Nat Med. 2003;9:104–7.
Utech S, Prodanovic R, Mao AS, Ostafe R, Mooney DJ, Weitz DA. Microfluidic generation of monodisperse, structurally homogeneous alginate microgels for cell encapsulation and 3D cell culture. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015;4:1628–33.
Pascual E, Jovaní V. Synovial fluid analysis. Best Pr Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005;19:371–86.
Bashor CJ, Hilton IB, Bandukwala H, Smith DM, Veiseh O. Engineering the next generation of cell-based therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;21:655–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-022-00476-6.
Duc M, Hoang DM, Phuong T, Pham PT, Trung Q, Bach TQ, et al. Stem cell-based therapy for human diseases. Sign Transduct Targ Ther. 2022; 272, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-01134-4.
Mousaei Ghasroldasht M, Seok J, Park HS, Liakath Ali FB, Al-Hendy A. Stem cell therapy: from idea to clinical practice. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:2850 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052850.
Zhang Y, Wu D, Zhao X, Pakvasa M, Tucker AB, Luo H, et al. Stem cell-friendly scaffold biomaterials: applications for bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:598607 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.598607.
Venkatesan J, Nithya R, Sudha PN, Kim SK. Role of alginate in bone tissue engineering. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2014;73:45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800268-1.00004-4.
Sharmila G, Muthukumaran C, Kirthika S, Keerthana S, Kumar NM, Jeyanthi J. Fabrication and characterization of Spinacia oleracea extract incorporated alginate/carboxymethyl cellulose microporous scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;156:430–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.059.
Carneiro D, Araújo LT, Santos GC, Damasceno PKF, Vieira JL, Santos RR, et al. Clinical trials with mesenchymal stem cell therapies for osteoarthritis: challenges in the regeneration of articular cartilage. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:9939 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24129939.
Carbone RG, Monselise A, Bottino G, Negrini S, Puppo F. Stem cells therapy in acute myocardial infarction: a new era? Clin Exp Med. 2021;21:231–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-021-00682-3.
Almawash S, Osman SK, Mustafa G, El Hamd MA. Current and future prospective of injectable hydrogels—design challenges and limitations. Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15:371 https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15030371.
Ashimova A, Yegorov S, Negmetzhanov B, Hortelano G. Cell encapsulation within alginate microcapsules: immunological challenges and outlook. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:380 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00380.
Mazutis L, Gilbert J, Ung WL, Weitz DA, Griffiths AD, Heyman JA. Single-cell analysis and sorting using droplet-based microfluidics. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:870–91.
Collins DJ, Neild A, deMello A, Liu AQ, Ai Y. The Poisson distribution and beyond: methods for microfluidic droplet production and single cell encapsulation. Lab Chip. 2015;15:3439–59.
Teh SY, Lin R, Hung LH, Lee AP. Droplet microfluidics. Lab Chip. 2008;8:198–220.
Li FY, Truong VX, Thissen H, Frith JE, Forsythe JS. Microfluidic encapsulation of human mesenchymal stem cells for articular cartilage tissue regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:8589–601.
Zhao X, Liu S, Yildirimer L, Zhao H, Ding RH, Wang HN, et al. Injectable stem cell-laden photocrosslinkable microspheres fabricated using microfluidics for rapid generation of osteogenic tissue constructs. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26:2809–19.
Cattelan G, Guerrero Gerbolés A, Foresti R, Pramstaller PP, Rossini A, Miragoli M, et al. Alginate formulations: current developments in the race for hydrogel-based cardiac regeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:414 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00414.
Acknowledgements
The work has been supported by the i3 Research England grant ‘3DMed - Anglo Canadian Collaboration on Interface Science for Medical Innovation’, contract n. 131918.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rashidi, N., Slater, A., Peregrino, G. et al. A novel, microfluidic high-throughput single-cell encapsulation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 35, 19 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-024-06785-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-024-06785-z