1 Introduction

Ce3+/Tb3+ doped phosphors have been extensively studied in recent years for their potential applications in three-base color white light-emitting diodes (w-LEDs), cathodoluminescence (CL) phosphors for field emission display (FED) applications, high energy laser technology, cathode-ray tubes (CRT), biological imaging, and so on [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Especially, in CL bio-imaging application of the phosphors, the size of an electron beam spot is on the order of nanometers, so by using suitable imaging probes, CL microscopy enables multicolor biological imaging with nanoscale spatial resolution [8]. Tb3+ ion is an important activator with 4f → 4f emission peak in the green spectrum region with high color purity centered at 543 nm, corresponding to 5D4 → 7F5 transition. However, due to the absolutely forbidden 4f → 4f electric dipole transition, the absorption transition of Tb3+ ion is very weak. Ce3+ ion possesses a strong broadband excitation in the near-ultraviolet (NUV) band due to the characteristics of optically allowed 4f → 5d transition from the ground state 2F5/2 to 5d level. Using Ce3+ ion as a sensitizer in Tb3+-doped phosphors, an efficient energy transfer (ET) is possible between Ce3+ and Tb3+ ions and the photoluminescence intensity of the phosphors can be increased. Therefore, Ce3+ and Tb3+ co-doped phosphors have been widely investigated as the green-emitting phosphors because of the high luminescent efficiency upon the electron beam or ultraviolet (UV) light excitation [9,10,11,12].

Different types of host materials for Ce3+/Tb3+ doped phosphors have been studied. For example, fluoride hosts, including Ln3+:CeF3 (Ln = Nd, Tb) used as bimodal probes for fluorescence and X-ray computed tomography (CT) [13], Sr2ScF7: Ce/Tb nanocrystals for lighting, photonic and biological imaging applications [14], β-Na(Gd, Lu)F4:Ln3+ (Ln = Ce, Eu, Tb) nanoparticles for radio-luminescent materials [15]; Borate hosts, for example Ba3Y2B6O15:Ce3+/Tb3+ [16], Sr3Lu2(BO3)4: Ce3+/Tb3+ [17] phosphors for NUV-excited white LEDs, Dy3+/Ce3+/Tb3+-activated MgB4O7 phosphor for dosimetry application [18]; Aluminosilicate phosphor CaAl2Si2O8: Ce/Tb/Yb for applications in Si-based solar cells as an efficient NUV to near-infrared (NIR) converters [19]; Phosphate phosphor SrMg2(PO4)2: Ce3+, Tb3+ with tunable luminescence for LEDs devices [20]; And gadolinium oxysulfide phosphor Gd2O2S: Tb, which is used as an efficient X-ray-to-light converter in many medical imaging modalities [21].

Until now, there have been few reports about the photoluminescence (PL) and CL properties of Ce3+/Tb3+ co-doped phosphors using Lu2O3–Gd2O3 solid solution as host materials. Lutetium oxide (Lu2O3) has cubic crystalline structure, and is an attractive sesquioxide host for optical applications, including high-performance scintillation detector and laser gain media. Lu2O3 is photo-thermally and photo-chemically stable and has a wide range of optical transparency from visible to NIR regions. The remarkable advantage of Lu2O3 is its high density (9.43 g/cm3) along with high atomic number (Z = 71 for Lu), which gives Lu2O3 with high stopping power for ionizing radiation detection [22, 23]. Similar to Lu2O3, gadolinium oxide (Gd2O3) also possesses high density (7.407 g/cm3) and high Z-numbers (Z = 64 for Gd) and favorable physical properties, including high melting point, low thermal expansion, and lower phonon energy, and has been widely studied as the host of luminescent lanthanide (Ln3+) ions for optical application. The similar bixbyite cubic crystal structure of Lu2O3 and Gd2O3 and the close ionic radii of Lu3+ and Gd3+ ion make Lu2O3–Gd2O3 solid solution a promising phosphor host material with a wide range of applications. The large band gaps (5.4–5.5 eV) of Lu2O3 and Gd2O3 allow them to accommodate the energy levels of different luminescent activators, especially rare-earth ions [24,25,26]. Rétot et al. reported the investigation of the scintillation properties of Lu2O3: Eu3+ and (Lu0.5Gd0.5)2O3: Eu3+ sesquioxide ceramics. They found that compared with Lu2O3: Eu3+ ceramics, (Lu0.5Gd0.5)2O3: Eu3+ presented a faster intrinsic decay time for Eu3+ and showed a reduced afterglow over the hundreds of milliseconds time range and a reduced thermally stimulated luminescence (TSL) intensity over the 10–650 K temperature range, which can be applied as a potential new scintillator with improved time response characteristics [23]. Lu et al. demonstrated that Gd2O3: Eu phosphor showed stronger photoluminescence intensity compared with Lu2O3: Eu phosphor due to the low electronegativity of Gd3+, and Gd3+-doping in Lu2O3: Eu can enhance the PL efficiency of the phosphors [27]. Thus, studies of the preparation and luminescent properties of Ce3+/Tb3+ co-doped (Lu, Gd)2O3 phosphors are meaningful for expanding the applications of Ce3+/Tb3+ phosphors in the relevant fields. In this work, a series of Ce3+/Tb3+ co-doped (Lu, Gd)2O3 phosphors with were prepared by sol–gel method using citric acid as the chelating agent. The crystal structures and compositional effects of Ce3+/Tb3+ doping on the PL and CL properties of the phosphors were studied. The ET mechanism between Ce3+ and Tb3+ ions in the phosphors is also discussed.

2 Experimental procedures

In this work, two groups of (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphor samples were prepared according to the following chemical formulas, i.e., (Lu0.8−xGd0.15CexTb0.05)2O3 (x = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6 mol%) and (Lu0.847−yGd0.15Ce0.003Tby)2O3 (y = 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 mol%). Taking the sample of one chemical composition as an example, the experimental procedure is as follows: Stoichiometric amounts of Lu2O3, Gd2O3, CeO2 and Tb4O7 were weighed according to the above chemical formulas and put in a beaker, then the nitric acid (HNO3) solution (6 mol/L in concentration) was added into the beaker, which was then put on a magnetic stirrer and stirred at 80 °C for 4 h to form the transparent rare-earth (RE) nitrate solution. Citric acid (C6H8O7), which acted as a chelating agent with amount of RE2O3: citric acid = 1:1.667 in molar ratio was added into the nitrate solution while the solution was stirred continuously until the homogeneous solution was formed. The beaker with the obtained solution was then put in a thermostat water bath and heated at 70 °C for 4 h to form the wet-gel precursor, which was then dried at 160 °C for 2 h to form the dry-gel. The obtained dry-gel was crushed in an agate mortar, and then calcined at 1000 °C for 2 h in reduction atmosphere to obtain the (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphor sample. The corresponding schematic representation of the experimental procedure is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of the experimental procedure

Phase identification of the phosphor samples was conducted by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis on a Rigaku Ultima IV diffractometer with CuKα radiation source to evaluate the crystalline structure of the samples. The morphology and element distribution of the phosphors were measured with a TESCAN scanning electron microscope (SEM) attached with an Energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS, Oxford Instruments). PL and photoluminescence excitation (PLE) spectra of the phosphor samples were measured on a Hitachi F-7000 spectrophotometer with a 150 W xenon lamp as the excitation source. CL spectral of the phosphor samples were measured on a Hitachi F-7000 spectrophotometer coupled with an Optic-Zenith electron-beam-ray system as the excitation source. All the characterizations were conducted at room temperature.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 XRD patterns and morphology of the (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphor samples

Figure 2a shows the XRD patterns of the as-prepared (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphor samples with different Tb3+ doping concentrations. The patterns display that all the diffraction peaks of the phosphors are consistent with that of pure Lu2O3 phase (JCPDS No. 12-0728), no secondary phases or impurities are detected, indicating that Gd2O3 can incorporate well into Lu2O3 matrix to form the (Lu, Gd)2O3 solid solution host. Taking the diffraction peak of (222) crystallographic plane as a reference, it can be seen from the enlarged patterns of Fig. 2b that with the increase of Tb3+ doping concentration, the diffraction peaks of the samples shift slightly toward the lower diffraction angle. The ionic radii of the Lu3+, Gd3+, Ce3+ and Tb3+ ions are 0.848 Å, 0.938 Å, 1.034 Å and 0.923 Å, respectively. Partial substitution of Lu3+ ions by Gd3+, Ce3+ and Tb3+ ions in the Lu2O3 matrix can result in the expansion of unit cell and so the increase of interplanar spacing d. According to the Bragg's law 2dsinθ = λ, where d is the interplanar spacing, θ is the Bragg angle, λ is the incoming X-ray wavelength, the increase of d results in the decrease of θ. So, with the increase of Tb3+ doping concentrations, the diffraction peaks of the samples shift to the lower angles, which further verifies the successful consolidation of Gd3+, Ce3+ and Tb3+ ions into the Lu2O3 matrix. From the XRD analysis results in Fig. 2, the crystallite sizes of the (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphor samples with different Tb3+ doping contents are estimated by the Scherrer equation, D = 0.89λ/βcosθ, where D is the average crystallite size, λ is the x-ray wavelength, θ is the Bragg angle, β is the corrected full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the x-ray peak on the 2θ axis [28, 29]. The estimated crystallite sizes of the phosphors with different Tb3+ doping contents are between 70 and 82 nm. Figure 2c shows the SEM image of the phosphor sample with 10 mol% Tb3+ doping content, the particles of the phosphor show approximately spherical morphology and uniform particle size distribution, and the particle size is at nanoscale. Figure 3 displays the corresponding EDS mapping images of the RE elements in the sample, which indicates the uniform doping of Lu, Gd, Ce and Tb in the sample.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a XRD patterns of the (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphors with different Tb3+ doping concentrations; b enlarged XRD pattern between 29.3 and 29.8 degree; c SEM image of the phosphor

Fig. 3
figure 3

EDS mapping images of the (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphors

3.2 PL and CL spectral properties of the (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphors

Figure 4 shows the PLE spectra of the (Lu0.8−xGd0.15CexTb0.05)2O3 (x = 0.1–0.6 mol%) phosphors by monitoring the 5D4 → 7F5 emission of Tb3+ (λem = 543 nm). As shown in Fig. 4, there are strong excitation bands ranging from 240 to 350 nm with the highest intensity centered at 278 nm, which can be attributed to the 4f1–4f05d1 transitions of Ce3+ ions. In addition, several very small peaks can be seen in the range of 350–400 nm, which could be attributed to the f-f transitions of Tb3+ ions. Due to the forbidden nature of these transitions, their oscillator strengths are much weaker than that of the spin-allowed 4f1–4f05d1 transitions of Ce3+ ions, which reveals that Tb3+ ions are essentially excited by Ce3+ [30, 31]. The PL spectra of the (Lu0.8−xGd0.15CexTb0.05)2O3 (x = 0.1–0.6 mol%) phosphors (λex = 278 nm) are presented in Fig. 5a. All the samples show obvious PL emission peaks in the range of 450–650 nm, four emission peaks centered at 491, 543, 583 and 623 nm can be assigned to the 5D4 → 7FJ (J = 6, 5, 4, and 3) transitions of Tb3+ ions, respectively [2, 11, 32]. Among the four emission bands, the green light emission at 543 nm, which corresponds to the 5D4 → 7F5 transition of Tb3+ ions, has the strongest PL emission intensity. The positions and shapes of the PL emission peaks remain constant with the increase of Ce3+ ion doping concentration. Taking the PL intensity of 543 nm as a reference, Fig. 5b shows the PL intensities of the (Lu0.8−xGd0.15CexTb0.05)2O3 (x = 0.1–0.6 mol%) phosphors at 543 nm as a function of Ce3+ doping concentration. The PL intensities of the phosphors increase firstly with the increase of Ce3+ concentrations, and reach the maximal value when the Ce3+ content is at 0.3 mol%, then decrease with the continuous increase of Ce3+ concentration, which may be attributed to the concentration quenching effect. Figure 5c displays the corresponding CIE chromaticity coordinate diagram of the samples. The CIE chromaticity coordinates of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6 mol% Ce3+-doped phosphors are (0.2587, 0.5819), (0.2554, 0.5776), (0.2573, 0.5801), (0.2595, 0.5826), (0.2657, 0.5848), and (0.2691, 0.5862), respectively. It can be seen that the variation of Ce3+ doping content has minor effect on the luminous color of the phosphors, the chromaticity coordinates of the phosphors are close to each other, all in the pure green light region, indicating the color-stability of the phosphors.

Fig. 4
figure 4

PLE spectra of the (Lu0.8−xGd0.15CexTb0.05)2O3 (x = 0.1–0.6 mol%) phosphors

Fig. 5
figure 5

a PL spectra of the (Lu0.8−xGd0.15CexTb0.05)2O3 (x = 0.1–0.6 mol%) phosphors (λex = 278 nm); b PL intensity of Tb3+ (543 nm) as a function of Ce3+ doping concentration; c CIE chromaticity coordinate diagram

Figure 6 shows the PLE spectra of the (Lu0.847-yGd0.15Ce0.003Tby)2O3 (y = 7–13 mol%) phosphors by monitoring the 5D4 → 7F5 emission of Tb3+ (λem = 543 nm). It can be seen from Fig. 6 that by monitoring 543 nm emission of Tb3+ ion, the PLE spectra exhibit three excitation bands, the band centered at 243 nm belongs to the 4f-5d transition of Tb3+, the wide band in the range of 260–330 nm can be attributed to the excitation transition of Ce3+, and the weak excitation band in the range of 340–400 nm belongs to the intra 4f8 excitation transition of Tb3+ [2, 10, 33]. Figure 7a displays the PL spectra of the (Lu0.847-yGd0.15Ce0.003Tby)2O3 (y = 7–13 mol%) phosphors upon 243 nm excitation. The emission peaks at 468 nm can be assigned to the 5D3 → 7F4 transition of Tb3+ ion., and the peaks at 491, 543, 583 and 623 nm are due to transitions of 5D4 → 7FJ (J = 6, 5, 4, and 3) transitions of Tb3+ ions, respectively [2, 9, 11, 32, 34]. Among the five emission peaks, the green emission at 543 nm (5D4 → 7F5) is predominant. Taking the PL intensity of 543 nm as a reference, it can be seen from Fig. 7b that with the increase of Tb3+ doping concentration, the PL intensities of the phosphors increase firstly and reach the maximal value when the doping concentration of Tb3+ is at 10 mol%, then decrease with the continuous increase of Tb3+ concentration. Figure 7c shows the corresponding CIE chromaticity coordinate diagram of the phosphors. The CIE chromaticity coordinates of 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 mol% Tb3+-doped phosphors are (0.2467, 0.5408), (0.2516, 0.5509), (0.2406, 0.5374), (0.256, 0.5607), (0.255, 0.5605), (0.2505, 0.5352), and (0.2566, 0.5374), respectively. The phosphors also display a color-stability property upon the variation of Tb3+-doping concentration, the luminous color of the phosphors is all in the pure green light region, which is very important for the application of the synthesized samples as a green phosphor in the related fields.

Fig. 6
figure 6

PLE spectra of the (Lu0.847−yGd0.15Ce0.003Tby)2O3 (y = 7–13 mol%) phosphors

Fig. 7
figure 7

a PL spectra of the (Lu0.847−yGd0.15Ce0.003Tby)2O3 (y = 7–13 mol%) phosphors (λex = 243 nm); b PL intensity of Tb3+ (543 nm) as a function of Tb3+ doping concentration; c CIE chromaticity coordinate diagram

The PL properties of (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphors upon UV excitation are determined by transitions between f-electron and d-electron states of Ce3+ and between different f-electron states of Tb3+, which is schematically shown in Fig. 8. Upon UV excitation, electrons of Ce3+ in the 4f ground state are populated to the higher 5d excited state, and then relax to the lowest splitting 5d state non-radiatively. Some of the excited electrons come back to 2F7/2/2F5/2 levels and generate 5d-4f emission of Ce3+, other electrons relax non-radiatively to the 4f ground state and transfer the energy to Tb3+ by ET process to populate 5D3 and 5D4 levels of Tb3+. Subsequent radiative transitions between the excited 5D4 state and the 7FJ (J = 0–6) ground states of Tb3+ generate strong green luminescence, and the emission 5D4 → 7F5 centered at 543 nm is predominant [1, 2, 11, 32]. Figure 9a shows the PL spectra of the (Lu0.747Gd0.15Ce0.003Tb0.1)2O3 phosphor sample upon 243 nm, 278 nm and 305 nm excitation. It is noted that the excitation wavelength does not change the location and shape of the emission bands, which means the energy level transitions of the PL emission processes are the same. Meanwhile, excitation wavelength has obvious influence on the PL emission intensity of the phosphor samples, the sample with 243 nm excitation has the strongest PL intensity. Figure 9b shows the corresponding CIE chromaticity coordinate diagram of the sample, the CIE chromaticity coordinates of 243 nm, 278 nm and 305 nm-excited sample are (0.256, 0.5607), (0.2512, 0.5295), and (0.2552, 0.5399), respectively. It can be seen that the change of excitation wavelength can slightly affect the luminous color of the phosphor, which generally shifts from green to green–blue region with the increase of excitation wavelength from 243 to 305 nm.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Schematic diagram of energy transfer between Ce3+ and Tb3+

Fig. 9
figure 9

a PL spectra of the (Lu0.747Gd0.15Ce0.003Tb0.1)2O3 phosphor upon excitation of different wavelength; b CIE chromaticity coordinate diagram

In addition to being excited by UV light, the as-prepared (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphors can also be excited by cathode ray. Figure 10a illustrates the CL spectra of the synthesized (Lu0.8-xGd0.15CexTb0.05)2O3 (x = 0.1–0.6 mol%) phosphors upon the excitation of cathode ray (accelerating voltage = 12 kV). Upon the excitation of cathode ray, the (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphors exhibit a strong green emission, the CL emission bands of the phosphors are similar to that of the PL emission bands, indicating the similarity of the emission mechanism of the two luminescence modes [4, 35, 36]. The CL spectra of (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphors consist of four emission bands, corresponding to the 5D4 → 7FJ (J = 6, 5, 4, and 3) transitions of Tb3+, respectively, the 5D4 → 7F5 transition at 543 nm has the strongest emission intensity. Figure 10b shows the CL intensities of the (Lu0.8−xGd0.15CexTb0.05)2O3 (x = 0.1–0.6 mol%) phosphors at 543 nm as a function of Ce3+ doping concentration. The CL intensities of the phosphors increase firstly with the increase of Ce3+ concentrations, and reach the maximal value when the Ce3+ content is at 0.4 mol%, then decrease with the continuous increase of Ce3+ concentration. The corresponding CIE chromaticity coordinate diagram of the phosphors is shown in Fig. 10c, the CIE chromaticity coordinates of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6 mol% Ce3+-doped phosphors are (0.3654, 0.5465), (0.356, 0.5535), (0.3305, 0.571), (0.3308, 0.571), (0.3299, 0.576), and (0.3704, 0.5425), respectively. It can be seen from Fig. 10c that upon the excitation of cathode ray, the (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphors demonstrate a color-tunable luminescence property. With the increase of Ce3+-doping concentration, the luminous color of the phosphors can be generally adjusted from yellow-green to pure green region, which is different from that of the UV-excited samples. The color-tunable CL property of the (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphors reveals that the synthesized phosphors may be a promising material for the application in the relevant fields, for example in biological imaging and FED device applications [2, 4, 8].

Fig. 10
figure 10

a CL spectra of the (Lu0.8−xGd0.15CexTb0.05)2O3 (x = 0.1–0.6 mol%) phosphors; b CL intensity of Tb3+ (543 nm) as a function of Ce3+ doping concentration; c CIE chromaticity coordinate diagram

4 Conclusions

A series of (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphors were prepared by sol–gel method using citric acid as a chelating agent. The synthesized phosphors are well-crystallized and display a pure Lu2O3 phase, indicating the successful formation of (Lu, Gd)2O3 solid solution host. The SEM analysis indicate that the phosphors show approximately spherical morphology and uniform particle size distribution, and the particle size is at nanoscale. The EDS analysis indicates that the elements of Lu, Gd, Ce and Tb are doped uniformly into the phosphors. Upon the excitation of UV light, the PL spectra of the (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphors with different Ce3+ doping contents consist of four emission peaks centered at 491, 543, 583 and 623 nm, which correspond to the 5D4 → 7FJ (J = 6, 5, 4, and 3) transition of Tb3+ ions, respectively. The green light emission originating from the 5D4 → 7F5 transition (543 nm) has the strongest PL intensity. Taking the PL intensity of 5D4 → 7F5 transition as a reference, with the increase of Ce3+ concentration, the PL intensities of the phosphors increase firstly and reach the maximal value when the Ce3+ content is at 0.3 mol%, then decrease with the continuous increase of Ce3+ concentration. The PL spectra of the (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphors with different Tb3+ doping contents consist of five emission peaks, the emission peaks at 468 nm can be assigned to the 5D3 → 7F4 transition of Tb3+ ion., and the peaks at 491, 543, 583 and 623 nm are due to transitions of 5D4 → 7FJ (J = 6, 5, 4, and 3) transition of Tb3+ ions, respectively. Among the five emission peaks, the green emission at 543 nm (5D4 → 7F5) is predominant. With the increase of Tb3+ doping concentration, the PL intensities of the samples at 543 nm increase firstly and reach the maximal value when the doping content of Tb3+ is at 10 mol%, then decrease with the continuous increase of Tb3+ concentration. The (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphors excited by cathode ray show luminescence spectra similar to that of the samples excited by UV light and a color-tunable luminescence property. The research results of the work indicate that the synthesized (Lu, Gd)2O3: Ce3+, Tb3+ phosphors have potential applications in the fields of three-base color w-LEDs, CL phosphors, FED devices, biological imaging, and so on..