1 Introduction

Many researchers have found that heavy metal oxide glasses (HMOGs) containing basic glass former, such as B2O3 have applications in photonics and optoelectronics, such as optical lenses, colored TV tubes, and optical limiters, and can be used as laser materials, etc. [1,2,3]. Borate is one of the best glass former and flux materials used in all heavy metal oxide glasses because of its small cation size (B3+) and high bond strength [2]. Due to its high chemical durability and thermal stability, it can form glass easily at low temperatures [3,4,5]. It exhibits high photonic properties, i.e., good clearness, optimal bandwidths, better-infrared transmissions, and high mechanical stability [6]. The boron atom is commonly coordinated with three or four oxygen atoms and produces [BO3] or [BO4] structural units in borate glasses. These two fundamental parts can merge in any way and are also called superstructure [7, 8]. Each alkali oxide is related to a proportionate quantity of B2O3 in alkali borate glass systems. Therefore, the number of structural units is determined by the total concentration of additional modifiers [9, 10]. Lead oxide (PbO) plays a dual role of modifier and former. When Pb–O exhibits covalent bonds, they are used in IR transmitting devices, ultra-low loss waveguides, and optical grating. When PbO4 is mixed with bismuth borate glasses, it shows better stability in oxide glasses. Glasses made of lead borate oxide are transparent in the visible and near-infrared ranges and have excellent glass formation properties over a wide compositional range. Optical and electrical devices, thermal and mechanical sensors, and reflecting windows are the applications of PbO-containing glasses [11]. Lithium borate glasses systems have been intensively researched because of their significant role in solid electrolytes for thin-film batteries. The ionic radius of lithium ion is ≈0.76 Å [12]. The small atomic number, isotropic ion conductivity, lightweight, and highly electro-positive character of lithium ions make it possible to use it in high voltage and high energy density microbatteries [13]. Bismuth occurs in a monoclinic form and has an ionic radius of octahedral adjustment of six oxygen atoms, and they are placed at a distance from 2.14 to 2.29 Å, wherein three oxygen atoms are much closer, approximately 2.29 Å [14]. Bismuth ions exist in Bi+, Bi3+, Bi4+, and Bi5+ states. Bi3+ cation is more stable than other Bi cations and contributes more toward highly non-linear optical susceptibility [15, 16]. Borate glasses show different structural units, such as metaborate, di borate, pentaborate, orthoborate, and pyroborate [17,18,19]. Various properties of borate glasses with different constituents in ternary system Bi2O3–B2O3 [18], PbO-Bi2O3-B2O3 [17], ZnO–Bi2O3–B2O3 [3, 20], BaO–Bi2O3–B2O3 [20], PbO–Li2O–B2O3 [21], PbF2·Bi2O3·B2O3 [22], Li2O–MgO–Bi2O3–B2O3 [7], and Li2O·Bi2O3·WO3·B2O3 [23] are studied by many researchers. M. Subhadra et al. [24] reported the impact of V2O5 content on the optical and physical characteristics of lithium bismuth borate glasses. Their investigations revealed that the density, molar volume, and optical basicity of these glasses increase, whereas interionic separation, polaron radius, glass transition temperature, and bandgap energy decrease due to increasing concentrations NBOs with the addition of V2O5. Study of lithium zinc bismuth borate glasses revealed that Bi3+ cations are incorporated in the glass network as [BiO6] octahedral units at lower Bi2O3 content while it enters in the glass matrix both as [BiO6] octahedral units and [BiO3] pyramidal units at higher concentration. The variation in physical properties and structural changes occurring in the glasses was also correlated with the Bi2O3:B2O3 ratio [25]. E. M. Abou Hussein et al. prepared quaternary lithium bismuth silicate glass system with, PbO, BaO, or SrO and revealed that Pb2+ ions play an effective role in enhancing the electrical and optical properties of glass due to highly compact structure, low concentration of NBOs, defects or vacancies, and high polarizability [26]. Bhemarajan et al. [27] have presented a comparative study on bismuth borate lithium glasses with different modifier oxides and demonstrate the suitability of the glasses for various photonic applications. A number of researchers have worked to accurately incorporate the heavy metal oxide in the matrix of the glasses to improve their physical characteristics as radiation shielding materials [28,29,30]. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, there are only a limited number of thorough and exhaustive researches on the structural and optical studies of heavy metal oxide containing lithium borate glasses in the literature. In our previous work, we have prepared Li2O·PbO·Bi2O3·SiO2 glasses [31] with varying concentrations of Bi2O3 (0–50 mol%). The physical, structural, and optical features of such glasses were also evaluated. The authors conclude that the density of glasses is enhanced with increasing Bi2O3 content. FTIR structural analysis revealed the presence of Bi2O3 as network former with BiO3 and as modifier with BiO6 units.

The present study aims to prepare a new glass system having composition 30Li2O.20PbO.xBi2O3.(50-x)B2O3 (where x = 0–40 mol%) and investigate the influence of bismuth on the physical and structural characteristics of the prepared glass system. The above glasses have still not been synthesized to our knowledge, and also the FTIR and optical parameters have not been published to date. In addition, the optical properties of these glasses have been correlated with structural features by calculating the various optical parameters.

2 Experimental details

Glass samples having composition 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 (x ranging from 0 to 40 in steps of 10) were taken. Different compositions with codes

  • B0: 30Li2O·20PbO·50B2O3

  • B1: 30Li2O·20PbO·10Bi2O3·40B2O3

  • B2: 30Li2O·20PbO·20Bi2O3·30B2O3

  • B3: 30Li2O·20PbO·30Bi2O3·20B2O3

  • B4: 30Li2O·20PbO·40Bi2O3·10B2O3

were prepared by using AR grade chemicals (99.5%) purity. First, the appropriate amounts of these chemicals lithium carbonate (Li2CO3), lead oxide (PbO), bismuth oxide (Bi2O3), and boric acid (H3BO3) are mixed in an agate pestle mortar. Then the mixture was put in a porcelain crucible and heat it in a programmable electric muffle furnace at a temperature of 1100 °C, maintained for half an hour. After that mixture is placed onto a stainless-steel plate, and another plate is pressed immediately at room temperature. To confirm the amorphous nature of the prepared samples, X-ray patterns of the glass samples have been recorded by using a Rigaku Table-Top X-ray diffractometer with source Cu Kα radiation in the 2θ range 10°–80° at a scanning rate of 10°/min. The density (D) of glass samples has been measured using the weight displacement method (Archimedes principle), using xylene as an immersion fluid. The glass transition temperature (Tg) was measured using Differential Scanning Calorimeter (Model Mettler Toledo Q20) maintained at a temperature of 10 °C/min. FTIR spectra were recorded using a Perkin Elmer Spectrum BX II spectrophotometer in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 using powder samples mixed with KBr in the ratio of 1:20 in reference materials. The optical absorption spectra of glass samples were recorded using UV–Vis-NIR spectrophotometer model Shimadzu (UV 3600 plus) in the range of 190–3300 nm. Different types of fitting, like multiple peak fitting, linear, and non-linear fitting, have been fitted using origin pro 8.8 software.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 X-ray diffraction and physical properties

XRD results of the present glasses show the absence of any sharp peaks depicted in Fig. 1. The presence of broad haloes ~ 28° confirmed the lack of long-range order and ascertained the amorphous nature of the glass samples.

Fig. 1
figure 1

X-ray diffractogram for all the compositions of 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 glasses

Density is a very useful parameter to investigate the degree of structure compactness, changes or modification in the coordination or geometrical configurations, and variation of the dimensions of the glass network. Also, how tightly atomic groups and atoms in a glass network are placed together is mainly related to molar volume and density. The density of each glass sample was determined using the Archimedes principle according to the formula,

$$D = \left( {\frac{{W_{a} }}{{W_{a} - W_{x} }}} \right) \times D_{xy} ,$$
(1)

where Wa is the weight of the sample in air and Wx is the weight of the sample in xylene respectively, and \(D_{xy}\) is the density of xylene (= 0.8645 g/cm3). The measured values of density for all the samples (B0 to B4) are presented in Table 1 and variation with Bi2O3 concentration is shown in Fig. 2a. It is found that the density of glass samples increases from 3.63 to 4.96 g/cm3 with Bi2O3 content, which is ascribed to a lower molecular mass of B2O3 (69.62a.m.u) systematically replaced by a higher molecule mass of Bi2O3 (465.98a.m.u). Similar, trends in density values were also observed by Kaur et al. [32] in bismuth-containing lithium borate glasses and by Rani et al. [25] in 30Li2O·20ZnO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 glass system. It helps us to determine the compactness of the glass network. The molar volume (Vm) and crystalline volume (VC) are calculated by the following relations [33]:

$${\text{V}}_{{\text{m}}} = \sum \frac{{{\text{x}}_{{\text{i}}} {\text{M}}_{{\text{i}}} }}{{\text{D}}},$$
(2a)
Table 1 Density (D), molar volume (Vm), crystalline volume (VC), glass transition temperature (Tg), oxygen molar volume (Vo), oxygen packing density (OPD), ionic concentration (N), polaron radius (rp), inter ionic distance (ri), field strength (F), fraction of BO4 units (N4) of 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 glasses
Fig. 2
figure 2

a Compositional variation of density for all the compositions of 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 glasses. b Compositional variation of VC and Vm with bismuth content for 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 glasses

where xi and Mi are the molar fraction and molecular mass of the ith content.

$${\text{V}}_{{\text{C}}} = {\text{x}}_{{\text{i}}} {\text{V}}_{{\text{i}}} ,$$
(2b)

where Vi is the molar volume of an ith component in the crystalline phase. The values of molar volume for the crystalline phase were taken as Li2O (14.84 cm3), PbO (23.42 cm3), Bi2O3 (52.36 cm3), and B2O3 (27.30 cm3). Figure 2b shows the molar and crystalline volume increases with bismuth content, and their values are demonstrated in Table.1. It is also clear from Table 1 that not much change in Vm and VC values are observed for x ≤ 10 afterward, there is a significant difference in Vm and VC, which indicates excess structural volume increases with bismuth content. This is due to the increase of non-bridging oxygen ions in the glass matrix at the expense of Bi2O3 content. Further, It is concluded that bismuth ions have a large ionic radius than other constituents; expanding the glass structure and therefore, the molar volume of glass increases.

DSC thermograms of the synthesized glasses are presented in Fig. 3a. These thermograms provide the value of glass transition temperature as listed in Table 1, with the endotherm representing the rigidity and strength of the glass. Figure 3b reveals the compositional dependence of Tg. From the figure, it is observed that when the concentration of bismuth oxide is increased up to 20 mol%, the value of Tg increased and after that decreased (above 20 mol%). The decreasing behavior of these glass samples suggests the modifying role of bismuth oxide on the glass matrix. This result is supported by IR studies. As the borate oxide is replaced by bismuth oxide, [BO3] structural units are transformed into [BO4] structural units due to which the concentration of non-bridging oxygens increases in the glass matrix.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a DSC thermographs for different compositions of 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 glasses. b Compositional variation of glass transition temperature with bismuth content for 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3glasses

The oxygen molar volume (Vo) represented in Eq. (3) is defined as the volume of glass carrying one mole of oxygen and is determined by the molar volume [27]:

$${\text{V}}_{{\text{o}}} = \frac{{{\text{V}}_{{\text{m}}} }}{{\mathop \sum \nolimits_{{\text{i}}} {\text{x}}_{{\text{i}}} {\text{n}}_{{\text{i}}} }},$$
(3)

In which xi is the molar fraction and ni represents the number of oxygen atoms in each oxide, respectively. Using the standard formula in Eq. (4), the oxygen packing density (OPD) is evaluated based on the system density and composition. The values of oxygen molar volume and OPD for each glass sample are presented in Table 1 and variation with bismuth concentration is shown in Fig. 4.

$$OPD = 1000C\left( \frac{D}{M} \right),$$
(4)
Fig. 4
figure 4

Variation of oxygen molar volume and oxygen packing density with bismuth content for 30 Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3glasses

where C denotes the number of oxygens in the formula unit. We conclude that increasing bismuth concentration in all compositions increases the oxygen molar volume; however, the oxygen packing density decreases. The observed rise in oxygen molar volume and decrease in OPD implies an increase in non-bridging oxygen contribution with the addition of bismuth to the glass matrix. This kind of behavior has also been observed in Li2O.Bi2O3.B2O3.V2O5 glasses [24]. The concentrations of bismuth ions in prepared samples are calculated by using Eq. (5):

$$N \left( {\frac{ions}{{cm^{3} }}} \right) = \frac{{\left( {Avogadro^{\prime}s \, number} \right) \times \left( {glass \, denisty} \right) \times \left( {mol\% \, of \, ions} \right)}}{{\left( {Average \, molecular \, weight} \right)}}.$$
(5)

From Table 1, it was found that the ionic concentration of Bi3+ ions is increased in the order of 1021 cubic centimeters. The polaron radius (rp) and interionic radii (ri) were calculated by using the standard formula in Eqs. (6) and (7), in which N represents the ionic concentration [32]:

$$r_{p} = \frac{1}{2}\left[ {\frac{\pi }{6N}} \right]^{{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 3}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 3}}} ,$$
(6)
$$r_{i} = \left[ \frac{1}{N} \right]^{1/3} .$$
(7)

The increased concentration of Bi3+ ions in the glass matrix reduced the polaron and interionic radii due to decreasing the distorted lattice site. Similar orders in N, rp, and ri in have also been reported by Subhadra et al. [24] and Stalin et al. [23] in lithium bismuth borate glasses. The field strength (F) of the samples was calculated by the given equation [32]:

$$F = \left( {\frac{Z}{{r_{p}^{2} }}} \right).$$
(8)

With the addition of the Bi3+ ion attractive forces between ions and adjacent structural units increase, increasing the field strengths with a decrease in the interionic distance.

3.2 FTIR spectroscopy studies

Figure 5 depicts the active FTIR region for present glasses characterized by several broad peaks in the range 400–2000 cm−1, known as the fingerprint region. Deconvoluted spectra are shown in Fig. 6a–e and Table 2 lists the compilation of the data of deconvoluted spectra, providing peak position (XC), amplitude (A), and full width of half maxima (W) of the peaks. From past studies, it is well known that the FTIR spectrum of borate glasses is classified into three broad regions [34,35,36] that are shown in Fig. 5. The first region from 650–800 cm−1, is ascribed to bending of B-O-B linkages in BO3 triangles. Another region lies in the range of 800–1150 cm−1, representing the (BO4) sp3 tetrahedral unit in stretching vibration of borate. The last region ranging from 1150–1500 cm−1 shows the (BO3) sp2 planar unit in the B-O and B-O stretching vibration of BO3 and BO2O unit [37]. In the present samples, one more absorption region is observed in the range of 400–600 cm−1 associated with the different types of metallic vibration. The location near band 450 cm−1 may be due to the rattling motion of lithium ions in their local site [38]. A highly distorted BiO6 unit shows a band around ~ 472 cm−1 due to the Bi-O bonds vibration [39]. This region also shows the presence of symmetrical bending vibration of the PbO4 tetrahedral structural unit [40]. The low-intensity refined peak at 622 cm−1 in the pure sample (Fig. 5) is related to the symmetric oscillation of bending B-O-B bond in BO3 unit. The intensity of the peak is small due to the absence of bismuth in pure sample. As the growth of Bi2O3 content increase from 10 ≤ x ≤ 40 intensity and size of the peak increase. This is due to the Bi-O bonds vibration at the different wavelengths in distorted BiO6 polyhedral [27, 41]. For all compositions, the peak found in the band region from 650 to 800 cm−1 ascribed to the stretching of B-O-B bond in bending vibrations of BO3 pentaborate unit. Similar findings were observed by Moustafa et al. [42] and Ali et al. [43] in bismuth borate glass systems. Table 3 provides the assigned vibrational modes for observed infrared bands for all the present glasses. The deconvoluted data region, 800–1150 cm−1 (Table 2), exhibits various absorption peaks for different concentrations of bismuth. The band region in wavenumber range from 880–897 cm−1 may be attributed to the symmetrical stretching vibration of Bi-O bond in BiO3 pyramidal units [44, 45]. This band is not present in the pure sample due to the absence of Bi2O3. The analysis of peaks found from 922–1003 cm−1 shows the peaks at  ~ 922, ~ 968,  ~ 995, ~ 1000, ~ 1003 cm−1 and from 1038–1104 cm−1 shows the peaks at ~ 1038, ~ 1054, ~ 1102, ~ 1103, ~ 1104 cm−1, which may be attributed to the B-O bonds stretching vibration in BO4 unit from a varied-type borate group [46,47,48]. It can be predicted that bismuth may act as network modifier as well as network former in these compositions. However, the increasing concentration of bismuth oxide resulted in a change in the structure of the BO3 triangle to BO4 tetrahedra being near the energy required to break B-O-B bridges and form non-bridging oxygen and formed various types of the structural units [37]. In the same range of spectra, Abu-Khadra et al. [49] and Nagaraju et al. [22] have also found the similar structural variations for cobalt doped lead borate glasses. Observed band in the region 1150–1500 cm−1centered at 1290 cm−1 shows the peaks at ~ 1209, ~ 1210, ~ 1213, ~ 1214, ~ 1221, ~ 1278, ~ 1310, ~ 1315, ~ 1322, ~1354, ~ 1370, and  ~ 1391, ~ 1394, ~ 1402 cm−1. Peak found in the region 1209–1278 cm−1 may be related to the B-O stretching vibration of the BO3 trigonal unit. The peaks at ~ 1310, ~ 1315, and ~ 1322 cm−1 may be attributed to the B-O bond stretching vibration of various borate groups [50]. Also, peaks visible in the range 1354–1402 cm−1 ascribed to asymmetrical stretching vibration of borate triangle with BO3, BO2O and stretching vibration of borate triangle with (NBO) in various borate groups [51, 52]. Similar bands are observed by Ganguli et al. in the spectra of Li2O-PbO-B2O3 glasses [53]. The band intensity around 1350–1450 cm−1 decreased due to the non-bridging oxygen atoms in the glass network [53] which again reinforce the fact of production of BO4 structural unit at the expense of the BO3 structural unit. A similar type of behavior has been observed by Cheng et al. [39] and Stone et al. [54] in the binary glass system B2O3-Bi2O3. A keen observation of deconvoluted spectra shows that the peak intensities at 1150–1500 cm−1 progressively increase with an increase in bismuth concentration, indicating a population of NBOs. Intensity and width of the peak in pure sample found maximum at1038 cm−1. Furthermore, when the concentration of bismuth increases from 10 to 40 mol% the width and intensity of the peaks become small and shifted toward higher wavenumber, that indicating more randomness in the network. The distinctive band at 1630 cm−1 may be attributed to the bending vibration of H–O–H bond caused by the hygroscopicity of the analyzed glasses in all samples [52]. The deconvolution approach might be utilized to get N4 for various borate glasses [50] when various oxides have changed. The resulting values were found to be in good agreement (Table 1).

$$N_{4} = \frac{{A_{4} }}{{A_{4} + A_{3} }},$$
(9)

where A4 represents the peak area at 800–1150 cm−1 for the BO4 unit, and A3 denotes the peak area at 650–800 cm−1 and 1150–1500 cm−1 corresponding to the BO3 unit, respectively. It has been observed that the maximum fractional units of borate are present in pure samples which clearly confirmed the absence of bismuth. After that when the concentration of bismuth increases, borate units decrease as compared to pure sample.

Fig. 5
figure 5

FTIR spectra of different compositions of 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 glass system in the spectral range 400–2000 cm−1

Fig. 6
figure 6

a–e Deconvoluted FTIR spectra of each composition of 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 glass system in the spectral range 800–1500 cm−1

Table 2 Peak position (Xc), amplitude (A), and full width at half maxima (W) of deconvoluted peaks of FTIR spectra of different compositions of 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 glass system
Table 3 Infrared wavenumber and assignments of vibrational modes of 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 glass system

3.3 Optical properties

UV–Vis–NIR spectroscopy is the best technique for characterizing the optical properties of glass materials. Optical absorption coefficient (α) was estimated at various wavelengths by using the following relationship [55]:

$$\alpha \left( \nu \right) = \frac{1}{d} \ln \left( {\frac{{I_{0} }}{{I_{T} }}} \right),$$
(10)

where d is the thickness of the glass sample, I0 represents the intensity of the incident beam, and IT is the transmitted beam, respectively. Absorbance is represented by the factor ln (Io/IT).

Figure 7 describes the optical transmission spectra recorded for all compositions and forms a red shift in cutoff wavelength (λC) with the increase in Bi2O3 concentration. In terms of physical properties, an increase in non-bridging oxygen (NBO) atoms is most likely responsible for the increase in molar volume. In the present system, Bi2O3 works as a network modifier at moderate concentrations and dilutes into the matrix without breaking the B-O-B bonds. However, at higher concentrations of Bi2O3, B-O-B bonds are replaced by Bi-O-B and Bi-O-Bi bonds. This is attributed to the increase in NBO ions in the glass matrix. Also, from Fig. 7, it is clear that these samples have a large transmission region which makes them suitable for IR transmission window [25]. Optical band gap energy was calculated by the relation [55]

$${\upalpha }(\nu ) = \frac{{{\text{B }}({\text{h}{\nu}} - {\text{Eg }})^{n} }}{h\nu},$$
(11)
Fig. 7
figure 7

Optical transmission spectra of 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 glasses

where B is the band tailing parameter, Eg is the bandgap energy, and hν is the photon energy. The values of n are determined by the types of optical transitions as indirect allowed, direct allowed, indirect forbidden, and direct forbidden transitions and correspond to n = 2, 1/2, 3, 1/3, respectively. Indirect transitions were established in the prepared series. The absorption edge is divided into three regions. The first region is the high absorption region which is known as the “Tauc Region” as shown in Fig. 8.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Tauc’s plots for all the samples of 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 glass system for n = 2 (for x = 0 to 40 mol%)

From Tauc’s plot, the energy band gap is calculated by taking the linear area of the curves toward the energy axis at the \(\left( {\alpha h\nu} \right)^{1/2} = 0\) and the values are listed in Table 4. For the present transition band gap energy decreases with increased bismuth concentration, which attributed to the structural changes and increases in NBO ions which is also supported by IR spectra. As Bi3+ cation has large polarizing power, which affects the anion charge of O2− ions. The same type of behavior was observed by Mahmoud in lithium bismuth borate glasses [13], Sharma et al. in cadmium-containing sodium borate glasses [55], and Raut et al. in vanadium lithium bismuth borate glasses [56]. The second region appears due to structural disorientation of the materials, known as the “Urbach region”. Calculating the slope between ln(α) and hν from the Urbach energy curve (Fig. 9), values of ∆E may be computed by taking the reciprocal. Standard Eq. (12) can also be used to illustrate this relationship

$$\ln \alpha (\nu ) = \frac{h\nu}{\Delta E} + {\text{constant}}{.}$$
(12)
Table 4 Cutoff wavelength (λC), optical band gap (Eg), band tailing parameter (B), Urbachʼs energy (ΔE), refractive index (n), molar refractivity (Rm), reflection loss (RL), molar polarizability (αm), metallization criterion (M), oxide ion polarizability (αo2−), optical basicity (\({\Lambda }\)), electronegativity (χ), electronic susceptibility (\(_{{\text{e}}}\)), and theoretical optical basicity (\({\Lambda }\)th) of 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 glasses
Fig. 9
figure 9

Urbach’s plots for all the samples of 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 glass system a for x = 0 b x = 10 to 40 mol%

The minimum value of Urbach’s energy (Table 4) at a high concentration of bismuth indicates the possibility of long-range order and minimum defect concentration indicates optical stability is maximum. The decrease in band gap energy is consistent with Urbach’s energy which can be explained in terms of a fundamental transformation of present glass samples. By increasing the Bi2O3 concentration, the bond length of the BO3 structural unit rises in direct proportion to the molar volume, resulting in more non-bridging oxygen. These characteristics, together with the lesser bond strength of Bi–O (80.3 kcal/mol) compared to the bond lengths of B–O (192.7 kcal/mol) and Li–O (333.5 kcal/mol), would [13] reduce optical band gap energy and Urbach’s energy values. The third region arises due to weak absorption. The refractive index values can be calculated using the following equation [57]:

$$\left( {\frac{{n^{2} - 1}}{{n^{2} + 2}}} \right) = 1 - \sqrt {\frac{{E_{g} }}{20}} .$$
(13)

In Fig. 10, it is explicitly shown in the graph the value of the refractive index rises. By analyzing the refractive index, it was observed that non-bridged oxygen ions produce more ionic bond resulting polarization of glass system so that refractive index increases. Similarly, opposite variation observed for Eg is depicted in Fig. 10. This may also be attributed due to the quantum size effect that affects the structure of the band and reduces their energy.

$$R_{m} = \left( {\frac{{n^{2} - 1}}{{n^{2} + 2}}} \right)V_{m} ,$$
(14)
Fig. 10
figure 10

Variation of refractive index and band gap energy with Bi2O3 concentration for all the compositions of 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 glasses

where the Rm is known as the molar refractivity and the value of \(\left( {\frac{{V_{m} }}{{R_{m} }}} \right)\) is called reflection loss (RL) [58]. The value of Rm increases and reflection loss decreases with an increase in the concentration of bismuth oxide. The Lorentz–Lorentz notation shows that the molar refractivity of the glass specimen material follows a linearly proportionate relationship with the molar polarizability (\(\alpha_{m}\)) as shown in Eq. (15) [58]:

$$\alpha_{m} = \left( {\frac{3}{{4\pi N_{A} }}} \right)R_{m} ,$$
(15)

where \(N_{A}\) is Avogadro's number, which denotes the number of electrons associated with an applied electrical field. With varying bismuth concentrations, both molar refractivity as well as molar polarizability follow the same pattern, as shown in Table 4 and depicted in Fig. 11 graphically.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Dependence of molar refractivity values and electronic polarizability with Bi2O3 concentration for all the compositions of 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 glasses

As presented in Eq. (16), the Metallization criterion (M) can be applied to extract information about the material:

$$M = 1 - \frac{{R_{m} }}{{V_{m} }}.$$
(16)

Rm/Vm < 1 (non-metallic) and Rm/Vm ≥ 1 (metallic) are the criteria for identifying the nature of solids according to metallization theory of Herzfeld [59]. The addition of bismuth to the samples results in a significant decrease in the values of the metallization criterion. The expansion impact of both the valence and conduction bands, resulting in a narrow bandgap, is responsible for this pattern. These metallization criterion results are consistent with the reported optical band gap energy measurements. The oxide ion polarizability (\(\alpha_{{O^{{2^{ - } }} }}\)) established by band gap energy can be attributed from optical absorption data by using mathematical relation (17) [60, 61].

$$\alpha_{{O^{{2^{ - } }} }} = \left[ {\frac{{V_{m} }}{2.52}\left( {1 - \sqrt {\frac{{E_{g} }}{20}} } \right) - \mathop \sum \limits_{i} p\alpha_{i} } \right]q^{ - 1} ,$$
(17)

where \(\alpha_{i}\) is the cation polarizability, p signifies the number of cations, and q stand for number of oxide ion, respectively, in the chemical formula ApOq. The computed oxide ion polarizability is found to be increased with increase in the concentration of bismuth oxide (Table 4). Since Bi3+ ions have high polarizability, the lone pair bond pair repulsion is greater than bond pair bond pair repulsion. A similar pattern is observed in optical basicity (\({\Lambda }\)) calculated by the relations

$${\Lambda } = 1.67\left( {1 - \frac{1}{{\alpha_{{O^{{2^{ - } }} }} }}} \right),$$
(18)
$$\chi = \frac{{\Lambda }}{0.75} + 0.25,$$
(19)
$$\chi_{e} = \frac{{\left( {n^{2} - 1} \right)}}{4\pi}.$$
(20)

Electronegativity is a characteristic of oxide glasses that indicates how powerfully an ion can bind electrons. As result in the data given in Table 4, the value of electronegativity of the ions is greater, the ions will attract more strongly toward the associated oxide ions, resulting in strong bonding between ion networks. Dimitrov, Sakka [60, 62], and Komatsu [60] discovered advantageous relationships between oxide ions electronegativity, cation polarizability, and optical basicity. By considering those relations it has been discovered that glasses with enhanced bismuth oxide content may vary their electronegativity (as shown in Fig. 12).

Fig. 12
figure 12

Variation of electronegativity of 30Li2O·20 PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 glasses with Bi2O3 concentration

The covalent and ionic nature of bonding of Lewis acid–base gives results of optical basicity. Electronic polarizability and electronegativity are the parameters that are interlinked with this [63]. By assigning basicity values to certain oxides, it is feasible to establish a "theoretical" optical basicity value, \({\Lambda }\)th, for any oxide substance that has been computed using the following equation:

$${\Lambda }_{th} = {\Lambda }_{{Li_{2O} }} .X_{{Li_{2} O}} + {\Lambda }_{PbO} .X_{PbO} + {\Lambda }_{{Bi_{2} O_{3} }} .X_{{Bi_{2} O_{3} }} + {\Lambda }_{{B_{2} O_{3} }} .X_{{B_{2} O_{3} }} ,$$
(21)

where \(X_{{Li_{2} O}} , X_{PbO} , X_{{Bi_{2} O_{3} }} , X_{{B_{2} O_{3} }}\) denotes the molar percentage of oxides of glass samples and \({\Lambda }_{{Li_{2O} }} , {\Lambda }_{PbO} , {\Lambda }_{{Bi_{2} O_{3 } }} , {\Lambda }_{{B_{2} O_{3} }}\) denotes the optical basicity of oxides as calculated by References [60].

An increase in optical basicity specifies the higher ability of electron transfer between oxide ions and cation. It is also feasible to determine what kinds of bonds are present in the glass system. A high value of optical basicity indicates more significant ionic interaction, whereas a low value indicates covalent bonding [64]. The increase in Λ is presented in Fig. 13 suggest that the ionic character of the analyzed glass system increases with Bi2O3 content and is supported by FTIR and absorption spectra results.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Plots of oxide ion polarizability and optical basicity of 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3 glasses with Bi2O3 concentration

4 Conclusions

A new glass series having composition 30Li2O·20PbO·xBi2O3·(50-x)B2O3; (where x = 0 to 40 mol%) was synthesized by the conventional melt quenching method and their various structural properties were obtained to know the influence of conditional glass former Bi2O3 on the host glass structure. The presence of broad haloes ~ 28° confirms the short-range order ascertained amorphous nature of glass samples. Different physical parameters, such as density, molar volume, crystalline volume, and OPD values, were also observed. Density and molar volume of these samples found to be increased from 3.63 to 4.96 g/cm3 and from 24.35 to 49.78 cm3/mol, respectively, with concentration of bismuth. On increasing the bismuth oxide, the structural units BO3 transformed into BO4 structural units obtained from the FTIR analysis. The band 880–897 cm−1 in wavenumber region attributed to the symmetrical stretching vibration of Bi-O bond in BiO3 pyramidal units. Also, the band intensity around the band region 1350–1450 cm−1 decreased which reveals that NBO’s increased in the glass matrix at the expense of Bi2O3 content. From the optical analysis, the various parameters were also examined. The indirect allowed optical transition is feasible. Cutoff wavelength increases from 447 to 559 nm and bandgap energy decreases from 2.40 to 2.25 eV due to the influences of bismuth content that affect the NBO’s ion and reduce the bandgap energy. An overall analysis of these results suggest the suitability of the present glasses in the area of photonics, such as for infrared transmitting materials and non-linear optical systems.