1 Introduction

The technology currently available derives from the unique physical properties of materials, such as abrasive surfaces, semiconductors, and magnets [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Many of these materials exist in bulk, but reducing the material dimensions like thin films will lead to additional physical properties [7, 8]. Organic compounds are a recent field of electronic materials considered low-cost organic electronics prospects [9, 10]. At present, an expanding and dynamic field of research is the study of organic semiconducting materials. Mainly for their physical properties (optical, electrical, etc.), a variety of applications can be envisaged, such as Schottky diodes [11], photovoltaic devices [12], transistors for field effects [13], light-emitting diodes [14], and gas sensors [15].

Porphyrin dyes play a significant role in many biological processes, from the transport of oxygen to photosynthesis, from catalysts to improvements in pigmentation and optoelectronics and laser processing to electronics [15,16,17,18] and have received significant attention in the research community [15,16,17,18,19,20]. One of the Porphyrin family is 2,7,12,17-Tetra-tert-butyl-5,10,15,20-tetraaza-21H,23H-porphine (TTBTP), which is a molecular organic semiconductor grown in very ordered thin films, and currently under investigation as the principal thin film candidate [21].

In the previous work on TTBTP thin films, TTBTP films were found to have band gaps of 1.75 eV, making these films appropriate for optoelectronic applications [21]. Therefore, this work deals with investigating the structural and electrical properties of TTBTP films and calculating the essential parameters that give the possibility of applying it in manufacturing heterojunction devices. One particular aspect is film thickness, and it affects the electrical and magnetic properties and requires a precise characterization.

2 Experimental

The organic compound, TTBTP, was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (see Scheme 1). TTBTP has the empirical formula, C32H42N8, and a molecular weight of 538.73 g/mol. TTBTP films of varying thicknesses (50, 95, 133, and 177 nm) were obtained by employing the efficient thermal vacuum evaporation technique. Using a coating unit (HHV Auto 306), the vacuum chamber was evacuated for 4 h. The thermal evaporation procedure is shown in Scheme 2. The pressure was 1.32 × 10− 4 Pa to avoid the evaporated powder’s interaction with the remaining impure gases. The TTBTP vapor subsequently was deposited into a cleaned glass substrate. The layer’s deposition rate was 1.25 nm/s, while a quartz crystal monitor controlled the film thickness. Then, the thickness of the film was analyzed using an interferometric method. The films were prepared in a planar configuration for the measurement of electrical conductivity. While a sandwich configuration Au/TTBTP/Au for JV measurements. Au electrodes were evaporated over the prepared films via a mask.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

The molecular structure of the TTBTP compound

Scheme 2
scheme 2

The schematic diagram of the thermal evaporation process

In this study, the structure of TTBTP in powder and thin film form has been investigated and characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD). This test was achieved by a modern automated and computer-based (Philips X’pert) diffractometer with CuKα Ni-filtered radiation (λ = 0.1542 nm), operated at 35 kV and 30 mA. In surface morphology, an electron microscope platform SEM-Joel has been used to scanning electron microscope (SEM) images for TTBTP films. Using a digital electrometer (Keithley model 610), the electrical resistance (R) was calculated. The electrical conductivity (σ) was calculated using the equation σ = L/RA, where L refers to the length, and A refers to the area. For JV measurements, a sandwich configuration of the Au/TTBTP/Au was accomplished. As a source of current and a meter, a Keithley Model 617 with a high impedance electrometer was used to test current at different voltages. The sample temperature was evaluated by A Cr–Al thermocouple, monitored by a micro-voltmeter.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Structural investigation

The structure of TTBTP material was measured by X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns at room temperature. Figure 1 displays TTBTP powder XRD patterns in a polycrystalline structure. For all diffraction lines, the lattice parameters were determined using the CRYSFIRE program [22]. The results obtained showed that the TTBTP crystal system is tetragonal with group space P42. The lattice parameters were given as a = b = 6.507 nm, c = 24.832 nm, and α = β = γ = 90°. The CHECKCELL program was used to calculate the Miller indices (hkl) for each diffraction peak [23]. Table 1 shows the values of the Miller indices (hkl) and the interplanar spacing (dhkl) for each diffraction peak.

Fig. 1
figure 1

XRD pattern of TTBTP compound in the powder form

Table 1 The interplanar spacing (dhkl) and the values of Miller indices h k l for TTBTP powder

Figure 2 displays the XRD pattern for TTBTP films at different film thicknesses. This figure reveals that the rise in film thickness is affecting rising film crystallography. There is only one significant peak in the (3 0 5) direction indicating preferential orientation. Also, the increase in the crystallinity of films can be deduced by the increase in thickness due to the rise of aggregation particles as the deposited layers of the TTBTP material increase [24].

Fig. 2
figure 2

XRD of TTBTP films with different thicknesses

Commonly, film nanostructure can be examined by evaluating the mean size of crystallite (D). Based on Scherrer’s equation, the following expression can be used to test the D values [25]:

$$D=\frac{K\lambda }{\beta \cos\theta },$$
(1)

where K is the Scherrer’s constant, λ is the X-ray wavelength (λ = 0.154 nm), and β is the peak width (in radians) at the half-maximum. The values of D were calculated and increased in these values from 24 to 56 nm with the accretion of film thickness from 50 to 177 nm, respectively, as shown in Table 2. It can, therefore, be inferred that TTBTP films exhibit nanostructure-based properties. Moreover, the enhancement of crystallography was observed with an increase in the film thickness.

Table 2 Crystalline parameters of TTBTP with different thicknesses

It is also convenient to measure some useful crystalline parameters such as the density of dislocation, which indicates the length of dislocation lines per unit volume, the number of crystallites per unit surface area (Nc), and the density of dislocation (εs). Those parameters could be assessed from the following terms [26]:

$$\delta=\frac1{D^2},$$
(2)
$$N_{\rm c}=\frac d{D^3},$$
(3)
$$\epsilon_{\rm s}=\frac{\beta \cos\theta}4,$$
(4)

where d refers to the film thickness. The corresponding values of δ, Nc, and εs for various film thicknesses were presented in Table 2. Contrary to the rise in D value as the film increases, it was found that the values of δ, Nc, and εs decrease. This decrease provides evidence of the defects and imperfections reduction as the film thickness increases.

SEM can provide good surface renditions, but specimens need to be vacuum-coated with gold to avoid charging. SEM was used to study the TTBTP film morphologies. Figure 3 exhibits the morphologies of 177 nm thick TTBTP films. The topography of the surface, as shown, is distinguished by significant spherical granules. The particle diameter analysis histogram is shown in Fig. 4, accomplished with the well-known online software IMAGE J. The value of the mean diameter of the spherical granules was estimated to be about 250 nm, which was taken from the histogram.

Fig. 3
figure 3

SEM of TTBTP films with thicknesses of 177 nm

Fig. 4
figure 4

Distributional histogram of TTBTP particle size deduced from the SEM image

3.2 Electrical conductivity investigation

The electrical conductivity (σ) in the material gives an insight into the carrier-charging mechanism. One of the notable points in the conduction analysis is the measured thermal activation energy of the materials. Figure 5 depicts the relation between lnσ and 1000/T for TTBTP film with different thicknesses. This figure shows the increase in conductivity with the film’s thickness because the structural crystalline is improved, and the grain size’s productivity within the material increases [27] (Table 3).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The relation between lnσ and 1000/T for TTBTP films with different thicknesses

Figure 5 indicates that the TTBTP film is a semiconductor with two thermally activated conduction mechanisms. This behavior implies that ln(σ) has direct proportional to 1000/T, according to Arrhenius [28]:

$$\sigma=\sigma_{o1}\text{exp}\left(\frac{-\Delta E_1}{k_{\rm B}T}\right)+\sigma_{o2}\text{exp}\left(\frac{-\Delta E_2}{k_{\rm B}T}\right),$$
(5)

where kB is the Boltzmann constant. The pre-exponential factors are σo1 as well asσo2. In regions (I) and (II), the electrical activation energy is ΔE1 and ΔE2, respectively. These parameters were calculated and listed in Table 4. The ΔE values of TTBTP films were found to be in the same order as other related organic semiconductors [28, 29]. Therefore, the conductivity mechanism is extrinsic conduct in the region (I), while the mechanism is intrinsic in the region (II). Further, Table 4 demonstrates the decrease in ΔE and σo values with rising film thickness. Therefore, the activation energy indicates the charges’ energy to move between the localized states’ two locations. Thus, the growth of the deposited layers has a distinct impact on the recovery process, decreasing both the degree of disorder and the defects caused within the sample. These observations align with the XRD study.

Table 3 Electrical parameters of TTBTP with different thicknesses
Table 4 SCLC parameters of TTBTP with different thicknesses

3.3 Current–density–voltage investigation

The space charge limited conductivity (SCLC) and the Ohmic electrical investigation are further illuminating the charging mechanism and the trapping of carriers in the material. The current–density–voltage (JV) characteristics for the structure for sandwiches of TTBTP film at different film thicknesses are shown in Fig. 6, which clarifies two various conducting fields, each with a threshold voltage and two different slopes. The slope was determined to be 1.04 ± 0.02 in the first region. The calculated slope was found to be about 2.02 ± 0.05 concerning the second region. In low voltage, particularly the disappearance of charge traps into the forbidden gap is characterized by the disappearance, and it is known as the Ohmic drives. In contrast, the SCLC drive mechanism is familiar in the high voltage region [30].

Fig. 6
figure 6

JV characteristics Al/TTBTP/Al sandwich structures of different thicknesses

Figure 7 shows the variation of ln J versus 1000/T for TTBTP at different film thicknesses in Ohmic areas. The interpretation of J to V for p-type material in the Ohmic domain can be explained in the following equation [31].

Fig. 7
figure 7

The relation between lnJ and 1000/T for TTBTP films in the Ohmic region

$$J=N_{\rm oq}\mu\left(V/d\right)\text{exp}\left(-E_{\rm F}/kT\right),$$
(6)

where No is the effective density of states in the valence band, which is found to be 1021 cm3 [32], q is the charge of the carriers, µ is the carrier’s mobility, and EF is the Fermi-energy level. In the Ohmic region; therefore, EF values can be determined to employ the slope of the fitting line, whereas the µ values can be evaluated from the crossroads between the line and the lnJ axis of different film thicknesses, the values of EF and µ of TTBTP films are given in Table 4. The values of µ reveal that the carrier’s mobility of this material is relatively the same order as other organic molecules. For example, the µ value of N,N-dimethyl-3,4,9,10-perylene-dicarboximide films, at the room temperature, was found to be 7.21 × 10− 9 cm2 V− 1 s− 1 [33], whereas it was recorded to be 1.56 × 10− 10 cm2 V− 1 s− 1 for films of 2,9-Bis [2-(4-2chlorophenyl)ethyl] anthrax [2,1,9-def:6,5,10-def’] diisoquinoline-1,3,8,10 (2H,9H) tetrone [34].

However, the relation lnJ versus 1000/T in the SCLC region, which is shown in Fig. 8, can be evaluated by the following equation [31]

$$J=\frac98\left(\frac{V^2}{d^3}\right)\left(\frac{N_{\rm o}}{N_{\rm t}}\right)\epsilon_{\rm o}\epsilon\mu\text{exp}\left(\frac{-E_{\rm t}}{k_{\rm B}T}\right)\text{,}$$
(7)

where Nt is the trap concentration and Et refers to the trap energy level above the valence band’s edge. The permittivity for free space is εo, and the dielectric constant of the film TTBTP is ε, which is given in the previous research for different thicknesses [21]. The parameters Nt and Et were calculated and listed in Table 4. It was concluded that the Nt value of the present sample is compatible with the other organic molecules. On the other hand, the trap concentration decreases with raising the film thickens due to reducing both the degree of disorder and the defects.

Fig. 8
figure 8

The relation between lnJ and 1000/T for TTBTP films in the SCLC region

4 Conclusions

X-ray powder diffraction TTBTP powder showed its polycrystallinity with a tetragonal orientation. Thermal evaporation of TTBTP led to nanocrystalline films oriented preferentially to the (3 0 5) plane with an amorphous background. The crystalline size increased by film thickens. However, the SEM of TTBTP film shows the film’s uniform formation and indicates nanocrystalline structure formation. The mean diameter value of the spherical granules was estimated to be about 250 nm. In TTBTP films, the electrical conductance temperature reliance suggests that the conduction is activated by a thermal cycle. The calculated values for both ΔE and σo show that electric conduct is extrinsic conduct followed by intrinsic. Measurements of current density as a function of temperature allowed the estimation of mean mobility values and trap concentration from SCLC data. The mobility values increase as the film increases, and it was comparable with other organic molecules. This result makes the TTBTP compounds promising materials for use in a wide variety of optoelectronic applications.