1 Introduction

Last decade and so, the nanomaterials make our life easier, comfortable, and well-appointed due to their high surface to volume ratio. They are extensively used in different fields such as bio-sensing, storage devices, and chromatic imaging. [1, 2]. Recently, the researchers are interested in spinel ferrites especially metal-substituted manganese ferrites since they exhibit novel properties and would have potential use in various fields such as electronics, ferrofluids, and magnetic storage technology [3]. In addition, these materials have applications in dispersion and storage of energy, catalysis, biotechnology, gas sensing, and particularly in carrier fluid due to surface dispersion [4,5,6]. Owing to compositional, morphological, and topographical behaviors, these materials are being widely used in biomedicine [7]. Firstly, their quantum size is comparable to those of cells ranging from 10 to 100 nm, proteins ranging from 5 to 50 nm, viruses ranging from 20 to 450 nm, or DNA ranging from 10 to 100 nm in length and 2 nm in width. Secondly, these spinel ferrites have intrinsic ability to penetrate in human body due to their magnetic anisotropy. Thirdly, spinel ferrite NPs can be designed to perform specific functionalities [8]. Therefore, NPs have been used as catalyst in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or as delivery of anticancer drug or gene delivery [9]. The quantum sized particles (< 10 nm) are utilized in angiography and tumor permeability.

In spinel ferrites, AB2O4, unit cell has 32 oxygen atoms that are closely packed. There are 64 tetrahedral A sites and 32 octahedral B sites present in a unit cell consisting of 32 oxygen ions [10]. The structure of spinel ferrite is not electrically neutral because + 2 or + 3 valence metals ions occupy all these sites. Due to this reason, positive charge is dominant in the ferrites. Thus, 8 tetrahedral A sites are occupied instead of 64 tetrahedral A sites. Similarly, 16 octahedral B sites occupied instead of 32 octahedral B sites. Manganese spinel ferrite having 8 formula units MnOFe2O3 and Oh7 (Fd3m) group space [11] with 227 group number. The spinel ferrite’s feature is the face-centered cubic (FCC) phase in which oxygen anions are attempted to adjust their position called oxygen parameter [12, 13]. The physical properties such as magnetic and dielectric properties purely depend upon the cation’s distribution, i.e., divalent metal cations. These properties will alter without disturbing the lattice structure since they rely on the precursor metal ions and the dopant material [14].

Seculic and Milutinovic [15] prepared manganese spinel ferrite via soft mechanochemical route and have noticed dielectric characteristics of the manganese spinel ferrite depend on interaction of grains and grain boundaries. Furthermore, the sintered temperature inversely affects the relaxation time. Zakaullah et al. [16] have fabricated ferrites by using sol–gel auto-combustion route and observed the variation in lattice and dielectric parameters as a function of sintering temperature and frequency. Farooq et al. [17] have synthesized manganese ferrites by using coprecipitation method and investigated the structural and dielectric properties of these materials. The effect of Mn–Fe ratio, sintered time, and temperature on the dielectric properties of Mn-ferrites have been reported.

At the quantum level, spinel ferrite nanomaterials can control electrical transport properties and can be fabricated via various techniques such as sol–gel route [18], solid-state reaction method [19, 20], hydrothermal technique [21], chemical coprecipitation method [22], citrate precursor route [23], combustion method [24], freeze drying technique [25], and reverse micelle method [26]. Among all routes, sol–gel auto-combustion route has been widely used since it is simple, easy, effective, eco-friendly method with low-sintered temperature.

In this research work, the copper-substituted manganese NPs (Mn1-xCuxFe2O4) with 0.0 ≤ × ≤ 0.5 have been synthesized by sol–gel auto-combustion method. The structural, dielectric, and electrical characteristics have been investigated by using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) method, and impedance analyzer, respectively.

2 Experimental procedure

The copper-substituted manganese ferrites nanoparticles (Mn1-xCuxFe2O4) with 0.0 ≤ × ≤ 0.5 were synthesized through sol–gel auto-combustion method. The precursors, manganese (II) nitrate [Mn(NO3)2].6H2O, copper (II) nitrate [Cu(NO3)2].6H2O, and iron (III) nitrate [Fe(NO3)2].6H2O purchased from Sigma Aldrich with 98% purity were weighed precisely with digital balance with 0.5, 0.5 and 1 molar ratio and dissolved in de-ionized water separately. Citric acid as fuel mediator with 0.5–1 molar ratio between metal nitrate and citric acid have also been used. The mixed solutions were placed at hotplate with magnetic stirrer under continuous vigorous stirring at temperature 100 °C for 45 min, until it converted into dense solution called sol. The sol was then further transformed into 3D network called gel. After the gel formation, magnetic stirrer was removed and the temperature of the hotplate was enhanced to 250 °C and maintained till the solution burnt due to self-propagating exothermic reaction. The gel became dry amorphous powder, which was further grinded with mortar pestle. The fine powder was sintered at 600 °C for 3 h to achieve required cubic phase. The sintered powder was quenched with hydraulic presser and converted into pellets. These pellets were investigated for structural, electric, and dielectric parameters. The flow chart of synthesis methodology is given in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart for sol–gel process of Mn1-xCuxFe2O4 samples

The powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique was employed to analyze the phase structure of the samples. XRD patterns revealed growth of single-phase crystalline structure of ferrites and α-ferrites. The average size of crystallites was estimated with help of Scherrer’s relation for (311) diffraction plane [27]. The electrical and dielectric characteristics of ferrite nanoparticles were analyzed with impedance analyzer; Wayne Kerr 6520P LCR meter, which is an imperative technique to understand the electrical and dielectric behavior of the samples.

3 Results and Discussion

The copper-substituted manganese spinel ferrite nanoparticles were synthesized through sol–gel auto-combustion technique and characterized to study the structural and dielectric properties [28]. The spinel structure of the ferrite was determined through XRD patterns, whereas dielectric properties were extracted from tangent loss and dielectric constant [29]. The properties like crystalline structure, surface layer, crystalline boundaries, and relative dielectric constant are observed to rely on cations distribution.

3.1 Structural analysis

X-ray diffractometer was used to draw powder diffraction patterns of Mn1-xCuxFe2O4 spinel ferrites nanoparticles as shown in Fig. 2. The samples were scanned through 2θ range from 20 to 80° using Cu–Kα radiation source with \(\lambda = 1.5405{\AA}\). The observed diffraction peaks correspond to (220), (311), (400), (422), (333), and (440) planes which are well matched with JCPD No. 03-0875 [30]. The XRD data revealed that prepared samples exhibit single-phase crystalline structure with α-ferrite. The most intense diffraction peak corresponding to (311) plane depicted the preferential growth of material along that plane.

Fig. 2
figure 2

XRD patterns of prepared Mn1-xCuxFe2O4 samples with x = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5

The crystallite size was estimated with the help of Scherrer’s relation [30].

$$d = \frac{{k\lambda }}{{\beta \cos \theta }}$$
(1)

Here d represents the particle size, β represents the full width at half maximum, θ represents the diffraction angle, λ represents the wavelength of X-rays, and k is the shape factor whose value is taken as 0.89. The average size of the crystallites was observed to be 17.7 nm. However, large crystallite size will decrease the magnetic properties of ferrite materials since it leads to a low signal to noise ratio [31]. The lattice constant was calculated using the following relation [32]:

$$a = d\sqrt {h^{2} + k^{2} + l^{2} }$$
(2)

Here a represents the lattice parameter and (hkl) represents the Miller indices. The dislocation density was estimated using the following expression:

$$\varepsilon = \frac{\beta }{{4\pi \tan \theta }}$$
(3)

Here ε represents the lattice dislocation, β represents the full width at half maximum, and θ represents the angle of diffraction. The dislocation density of the samples can be extracted using the following expression:

$$\delta = \frac{1}{{d^{2} }}$$
(4)

Here δ represents the dislocation density and d is crystallite size of ferrite nanoparticles. The structural parameters of the copper-substituted manganese ferrite nanoparticles are listed in Table 1. The variation in lattice constant and crystallite size as a function of copper substitution is shown in Fig. 3.

Table 1 Structural parameters such as lattice parameters, volume density, crystalline size, dislocation density, lattice strain, microstrain and stacking fault, bulk density, X-ray density, surface area of copper-substituted manganese (Mn1-xCuxFe2O4) spinel ferrites nanoparticles
Fig. 3
figure 3

Variation in crystalline size and lattice constant as function of Cu content

The microstrain of the ferrite samples was determined by using the following expression:

$$\varepsilon _{{{\text{micro}}}} = \frac{{\beta \cos \theta }}{4}$$
(5)

Here εmicro represents the microstrain, β represents the full width at half maximum, and θ represents the angle of diffraction. The stacking fault of the ferrite samples was calculated by using following relation:

$${\text{SF = }}\frac{{2\pi ^{2} }}{{45\sqrt {3\tan \theta } }}$$
(6)

Here SF is the stacking fault and θ is the diffraction angle.

The X-ray density was calculated by using the relation [33];

$$\rho _{x} = \frac{{8M}}{{N_{A} a^{3} }}$$
(7)

Here ρx represents the X-ray density, M represents the molecular mass, NA is the Avogadro’s number (6.023 × 1023 molecules), and a represents the lattice parameter. The bulk density was calculated as [34];

$$\rho _{m} = \frac{m}{{\pi r^{2} h}}$$
(8)

Here ρm represents the bulk density, m represents the mass of pellets, r represents the radius of pellets, and h represents the thickness of pellets. The surface area of pellets was determined by using following expression:

$${\text{S}} = \frac{x}{{\rho _{x} d}}$$
(9)

Here x is the constant whose value is 6000, ρx is the X-ray density, and d is the size of particles. The porosity of the ferrite samples was calculated as follows:

$$P = 1 - \frac{{\rho _{x} }}{{\rho _{m} }}$$
(10)

Here P is the porosity of pellets, ρx is the X-ray density, and ρm is the bulk density of pellets. The variation in X-ray density and bulk density as function of Cu contents in CuxMn1-xFe2O4 spinel ferrites is shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Variation in X-ray density and bulk density as function of Cu content

3.2 FTIR analysis

FTIR spectra of copper-substituted manganese ferrite samples were recorded in the rage from 400 to 1000 cm−1 as depicted in Fig. 5. The spectra reveled the existence of a vibration band at around 550 cm−1 due to the stretching vibration at A sites, whereas a vibration band at around 400 cm−1 due to stretching vibration at B sites [35]. These frequency bands υ1 and υ2 correspond to tetrahedral and octahedral sites as summarized in Table 2. It has been observed that absorption bands significantly shift as a function of Cu2+ concentration in the ferrites. The bond length between metal and oxygen ions and change of absorption band frequency that related to the A sites and B sites is linearly influenced by force constant. Furthermore, force constant at tetrahedral sites, FT and force constant, FO at octahedral sites were estimated as [36];

Fig. 5
figure 5

FTIR spectra of Cu-substituted CuxMn1-xFe2O4 where x = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5

Table 2 FTIR absorption band and force constant of octahedral and tetrahedral sites
$$F = 4 {\pi}^{2}{c}^{2}{v}^{2}{\mu}$$
(11)

Here F indicates the force constant, c indicates the speed of light, c = 2.99 × 108 ms−1, ν indicates the vibration frequency range of tetrahedral and octahedral sites, and µ indicates the reduced mass of Fe3+ ions and O2- ions (~2.065 × 10−26 kg mol−1). Force constant for tetrahedral site lies in the range from 2.02 × 10−2 to 1.98 × 10−2 Nm−1, whereas for octahedral site it is lies at 1.22 × 10−2 Nm−1. The substitution of Cu2+ affects the force constant as mentioned in Table 2 that resulted from cations redistribution between A sites [37].

3.3 Dielectric properties

The impedance spectroscopy is a suitable technique to investigate the electrical properties and time relaxation characteristics. It can be used to study the impedance behavior of substance and can analyze the ideal circuit model with discrete electrical component. The effect of dielectric parameters like tangent loss, relative dielectric constant, complex dielectric constant; impedance factors; real and imaginary, modulus; real and imaginary as a function of copper substitution was observed for all the samples in the frequency range from 20 Hz to 20 MHz. Generally, the dielectric properties depend upon the strength of electromagnetic interactions between phases, their structure, and phase dominance. The dielectric loss (tanδ) was determined as a function of frequency by the following relation [38]:

$$\tan \delta = \frac{1}{{2\pi fR_{p} C_{p} }},$$
(12)

where tanδ represents the dielectric loss, f represents frequency of applied electric field, Rp represents the parallel resistance, and Cp represents the capacitance of pellets. The dielectric has important role in the conduction mechanism of any material. The stoichiometric ratios Fe2+ ion’s variation and feature’s homogeneity have been influenced by dielectric loss in ferrites. However, it extensively depends on morphological features and fabrication techniques. Figure 6 shows the strong dispersion in dielectric loss at hoping frequency and synchronization point. This happens due to the conduction phenomenon and dielectric mechanism in the ferrites. The dielectric loss was firstly observed to increase and decreases at low frequency with Cu2+ substitution in the ferrites whereas saturated at high frequencies.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Dielectric tangent loss vs log of frequency for Mn1-xCuxFe2O4 nanoparticles

The relative dielectric constant was obtained from the following expression:

$$\varepsilon _{r} = \frac{{C_{p} t}}{{A\varepsilon _{0} }},$$
(13)

where εr is relative dielectric constant of the medium, Cp is parallel capacitance, t is the thickness of pellets, A and εo are area and permittivity in free space, respectively. The relative dielectric constant indicated the capacitive behavior of spinel ferrite nanoparticles as shown in Fig. 7. The variations in trend of relative dielectric constant in the copper-substituted manganese ferrite samples were observed due to space charge polarization. According to Maxwell–Wagner two-layer model, space charge polarization induced due to the inhomogeneous morphology of material. For a range of frequency, the dielectric constant initially decreases exponentially at lower frequency and saturated at higher frequencies. This variation is due to space charge polarization that arises from higher conductivity phase in the grain boundaries and localized due to gathering of charges due to applied electric field. The changing electric field will gather the charge carriers in the same axis, which takes finite time but at the particular frequency this phenomenon does not happen and this results in decrement of dielectric constant [39, 40].

Fig. 7
figure 7

Relative dielectric constant vs frequency for Mn1-xCuxFe2O4 nanoparticles

Imaginary part of dielectric (complex dielectric constant) can be expressed as:

$$\varepsilon ^{\prime\prime} = \varepsilon _{{\text{r}}} \tan \delta,$$
(14)

where ″ε represents the imaginary part of relative dielectric constant and tanδ represents the dielectric or tangent loss. The imaginary part of relative dielectric constant (complex dielectric constant) deals with resistance of the ferrites. Frequency-dependent complex dielectric constant of copper-doped MFO as depicted in Fig. 8. It can be observed that complex dielectric constant (resistive behavior) of ferrites linearly decreases with increasing frequency and Cu2+ concentration. Space charge polarization affected this behavior and can be understood with assistance of Maxwell–Wagner Model [41] due to inhomogeneous morphological features.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Complex dielectric constant vs frequency for Mn1-xCuxFe2O4 nanoparticles

The impedance loss and complex impedance of the ferrites express the contribution of grains and grain boundaries in the samples. The impedance loss (Z′) of the Mn1-xCuxFe2O4 nanoparticles is similar to the resistance applied in series as expressed below:

$$Z^{\prime} = R_{{\text{s}}}$$
(15)

Figure 9 shows the variation in impedance loss with increasing frequency and revealed the conduction mechanism due to the hopping of electrons that is directly proportional to the frequency of applied electric field [42]. It has also been observed that the real part of impedance loss (Z') increases with Cu2+ concentration. This behavior explained the space charge polarization in the samples. The merger of impedance loss at higher frequencies is due to the release of space charges.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Impedance loss vs frequency for Mn1-xCuxFe2O4 nanoparticles

The complex impedance loss can be determined by following equations:

$$Z^{\prime\prime} = \frac{1}{{2\pi fC_{p} }},$$
(16)

where Z" is the complex impedance loss, f is the frequency of the applied electric field, and Cp is the parallel capacitance of the pellets.

The complex impedance loss of the ferrite samples as plotted in Fig. 10 shows revealed that the complex impedance loss (Z") is arrived at the higher frequencies due to major contribution of the grains and grain boundary resistances. The observed peak corresponds to the dominating behavior of grain boundary resistivity over conductivity; however, the conductivity would be ignored at grain boundaries [43, 44].

Fig. 10
figure 10

Complex impedance loss vs frequency for Mn1-xCuxFe2O4 nanoparticles

3.3.1 Nyquist plot

The electrical behavior of Mn1-xCuxFe2O4 nanoparticles depends on contribution of grains and grain boundaries. The Nyquist plot (complex impedance and real impedance) has been drawn over wide range frequency and Cu2+ concentration to reveal the contribution of grains and grain boundaries as shown in Fig. 11. The existence of semicircle arc whose diameter increases with Cu2+ concentration is the result of contribution as DC conduction from grain boundaries [45]. This reinforces the idea of electrical mechanism that follows single relaxation characteristics [46]. The diameter of semicircles shows that the contribution of grain boundaries provides resistance in the sample, whereas capacitance depends over the estimation of maximum frequency of semicircle [47]. Cu2+ substitution increases the arc of semicircles and suggested a reduction in DC conductivity of ferrite nanoparticles. Therefore, resistive and capacitive characteristics of ferrites can be estimated through conduction and relaxation phenomenon associated with response of grain boundaries. Measured values of real (ε′) and imaginary (ε″) part of dielectric constant, tangent loss, real (z′) and imaginary (z″) part of impedance, real (M′) imaginary (M″) part of modulus and AC conductivity of CuxMn1-xFe2O4 nanoparticles are listed in Table 3.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Nyquist plots of CuxMn1-xFe2O4 spinel nanoparticles

Table 3 Measured values of real (ε′) and imaginary (ε″) part of dielectric constant, tangent loss, real (z′) and imaginary (z″) part of impedance, real (M′) imaginary (M″) part of modulus and AC conductivity of CuxMn1-xFe2O4 (x = 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4)

3.3.2 Electric modulus

The imaginary part of electric modulus (M″) can be calculated as [48]:

$$M^{\prime\prime} = 2\pi fC_{p} Z^{\prime},$$
(17)

where M″ represents the imaginary part (complex) modulus, f is applied electric field frequency, Z′ represents the real part of impedance loss, and Cp is the parallel capacitance of the pellets.

The complex electric modulus of the copper-substituted MFO ferrites in the range from 20 Hz to 20 MHz is plotted in Fig. 12. It can be observed that the real part of electric modulus of copper-substituted (Mn1-xCuxFe2O4) nanoparticles increases exponentially toward lower frequencies for all samples. The real part of electric modulus varies also with copper substitution.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Complex electric modulus vs frequency for Mn1-xCuxFe2O4 nanoparticles

The real part of electric modulus (M′) was determined by using following expression:

$$M^{\prime} = \frac{{M^{\prime\prime}}}{{\tan \sigma }},$$
(18)

where M′ represents the real part of electric modulus, M″ represents the complex electric modulus, and tanδ is the dielectric loss of pellet.

The real part of electric modulus shown in Fig. 13 revealed the variation in complex part of electric modulus of (Mn1-xCuxFe2O4) nanoparticles as a function of frequency up to 20 MHz due to contribution of insignificant electrode polarization, whereas conductivity relaxation process is obvious within the given frequency range. The conductivity relaxation shifted toward higher frequency range by the substitution of Cu2+ concentration. This behavior of the ferrites is non-Debye and occurred due to relaxation time distribution and the non-experimental approach of electrical functions. The maxima of the peak gives conductivity relaxation time with maxima because of the polarization mechanism [49].

Fig. 13
figure 13

Real part of electric modulus vs frequency for Mn1-xCuxFe2O4 nanoparticles

3.3.3 Cole–Cole plot

The Cole–Cole plots for all the samples revealed that grains and grain boundaries are influenced by Cu2+ concentration as sharp semicircles are depicted in Fig. 14. In general, for the ferrite samples, two semicircles appear, one corresponds to grain and the other corresponds to grain boundaries. The existence of only one semicircle in the present case depicted that the contribution of grain boundaries is dominant and resulted in reduction of DC conductivity of ferrites.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Cole–Cole (M′ versus M") plot for Mn1-xCuxFe2O4 spinel ferrite nanoparticles

In these plots, semicircle is depicted only at low frequencies which means impedance characteristics of ferrites follows Cole–Cole formula [50]. It can be seen that semicircles shifted away from origin confirming the increment in resistance and relaxation characteristics of ferrite samples [51].

3.4 AC conductivity

The AC conductivity of the ferrite is determined as

$$\sigma _{{{\text{ac}}}} = 2\pi f\varepsilon _{r} \tan \delta,$$
(19)

where σac represents the ac conductivity, f represents the applied electric field frequency, εr is the dielectric constant of the medium, and tanδ is the dielectric tangent loss of the medium. The dielectric tangent loss (tanδ), AC conductivity, and dielectric constant (′ε) were observed to decrease exponentially predicting the decrement in AC conductivity. Moreover, the higher dielectric dispersions observed at the low frequencies as plotted in Figs. 4, 5, and 6, respectively. The dielectric behavior of copper-substituted manganese (Mn1-xCuxFe2O4) spinel ferrites can be explained by Maxwell–Wagner two-layer model with assistance of Koop’s phenomenological theory [51].

The frequency of applied voltage and copper concentration in the ferrite samples can affect the conductivity. The frequency-dependent conductivity of Mn1-xCuxFe2O4 nanoparticles as shown in Fig. 15 revealed that conduction reduces linearly as a function of copper concentration; however, it is observed to improve at lower frequency. The variation observed at higher frequencies is due to dipole relaxation characteristics [52] of the samples validating their viability in sensors.

Fig. 15
figure 15

AC conductivity vs frequency for Mn1-xCuxFe2O4 nanoparticles

4 Conclusions

The copper-substituted manganese (Mn1-xCuxFe2O4) spinel ferrite nanoparticles have been synthesized successfully via simple, eco-friendly, and effective sol–gel auto-combustion method. XRD analysis revealed that the Mn1-xCuxFe2O4 exhibits cubic spinel structure with slight decrease in lattice constant as a function of Cu2+ substitution. The dielectric constant and dielectric loss observed to decrease as the frequency of applied electric field increases. These observations can be explained by space charge polarization in the light of Maxwell–Wagner two-layer model. The imaginary part of impedance, also called spectrum loss indicated only one semicircle, which shows the dominance of grains and the conduction through grain boundaries is negligible. The real part of impedance increases with Cu2+ concentration and frequency which suggested the reduction in conductivity of the samples. The prepared Mn1-xCuxFe2O4 spinel ferrite nanoparticles with good capacitance might have potential to be used in microwave applications.