Abstract
In this paper, I examine a phenomenon in Korean involving fragment answers and consider its implications. Taking as a point of departure the generalization that case markers on ellipsis remnants in fragment answers can be omitted only in string-final position, I argue that in these situations, PF deletion extends into the ellipsis remnant, deleting parts of it, such as a case marker, a postposition or, sometimes, even the head noun, up to recoverability and under adjacency to a string of elements that are deleted in PF for independent reasons. This parasitic deletion process, which I term “extra deletion,” sheds light on the nature of PF deletion, which I argue operates on strings of elements, similarly to the way that syntactic operations target constituents. The crucial idea is that, although it is mostly syntax that determines what is to be deleted (and, thus, elements that undergo ellipsis are usually syntactic constituents), PF deletion also has its own guidelines when it applies—namely that elements that are elided should form an unbroken, continuous string. What is interesting is that in contexts of extra deletion, the string of deleted elements is extended beyond what is initially marked for deletion by syntax, an important consequence of which is that PF deletion can ignore syntactic constituents. Furthermore, I make the novel observation that there exists a significant parallelism between fragment answers and right node raising, which has not been noted in the literature due to the sheer differences in their structure, surface form, and use. I argue that postulating extra deletion allows us to capture the parallelism straightforwardly, which in turn provides an additional argument for the PF deletion analysis of the latter construction, for which there have been several alternatives.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abels, Klaus. 2003. Right node raising: Ellipsis or across the board movement? In Proceedings of NELS 34, ed. Keir Moulton, and Matthew Wolf, 45–59. Amherst: GLSA.
Ahn, Hee-Don. 1999. Notes on case deletion. In Linguistic investigations: In honor of Professor In-Seok Yang, ed. Young-Wha Kim, Il-Kon Kim, and Jeong-Woon Park, 1–16. Seoul: Hankuk Publishing.
Ahn, Hee-Don. 2012. A study of fragments: Focusing on English and Korean. Seoul: Hankuk Munhwa.
Ahn, Hee-Don, and Sungeun Cho. 2007. Non-case-marked wh-phrases and left-dislocation. In University of Maryland working papers in linguistics, edited by Akira Omaki, Ivan Ortega-Santos, Jon Sprouse, and Matt Wagers, 111–141. College Park, MD: UMWPiL.
Ahn, Hee-Don, and Sungeun Cho. 2011. Notes on two types of fragments. Linguistic Research 28: 19–35.
Ahn, Hee-Don, and Sungeun Cho. 2013. Notes on right dislocation in Korean. Paper presented at the 2013 Ellipsis Workshop, Dongguk University, Seoul. December 7.
An, Duk-Ho. 2007a. Clauses in noncanonical positions at the syntax-phonology interface. Syntax 10: 38–79.
An, Duk-Ho. 2007b. Syntax at the PF interface: Prosodic mapping, linear order, and deletion. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
An, Duk-Ho. 2009. A note on genitive drop in Korean. Nanzan Linguistics 5: 1–16.
An, Duk-Ho. 2013. What is not NP-ellipsis in Korean. In Deep insights, broad perspectives, ed. Yoichi Miyamoto, et al., 22–41. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
An, Duk-Ho. 2014. Genitive case in Korean and its implications for noun phrase structure. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 23: 361–392.
Bak, Jeong-Sup. 2006. On the optionality of the genitive case marker uy. Studies in Generative Grammar 16: 3–18.
Bošković, Željko. 2004. Two notes on right node raising. In University of Connecticut working papers in linguistics 12, edited by Miguel Rodriguez Mondonedo, and Emma Ticio, 13–24. Storrs, CT: Department of Linguistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Bošković, Željko, and Howard Lasnik. 2003. On the distribution of null complementizers. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 527–546.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen, and Rint Sybesma. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 509–542.
Choi, Ki-Yong. 2009. Hankwuke kyekkwa cosauy sayngsengthongsalon. (A generative grammatical analysis of case and nominal suffixes in Korean). Seoul: Hankwuk Mwunhwasa.
Choi, Kiyong. 2011. On the nature of the dependency between a numeral and a classifier. Linguistic Research 28: 517–542.
Fox, Danny, and Howard Lasnik. 2003. Successive cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between sluicing and VP ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 143–154.
Fukaya, Teruhiko, and Hajime Hoji. 1999. Stripping and sluicing in Japanese. WCCFL 18: 145–158.
Hong, Yong-Tcheol. 1994. Ywunghap ilonkwa kyekcosa pwunpho (Incorporation theory and the distribution of case markers). Studies in Generative Grammar 4: 1–43.
Hong, Yong-Tcheol. 2004. Hankwukeuy kyekcosa thallakkwa pwucay (Omission and absence of case Markers in Korean). Phulangsu emwun kyoywuk (French Language Education) 18: 295–314.
Kang, Beom-Mo. 2002. Categories and meanings of Korean floating quantifiers—With some reference to Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11: 375–398.
Kim, Yong-Ha. 1998. Overt case and covert case in Korean. Studies in Generative Grammar 8: 177–237.
Ku, Nahyun, and Sae-Youn Cho. 2014. Markers, index, and multiple fragment answers in Korean. Studies in Generative Grammar 24: 591–612.
Lasnik, Howard. 1981. Restricting the theory of transformation. In Explanation in linguistics, ed. Norbert Hornstein, and David Lightfoot, 152–173. London: Longmans.
Lasnik, Howard. 2001. When can you save a structure by destroying it? In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 31, ed. Min-joo Kim, and Uri Strauss, 301–320. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Lasnik, Howard. 2014. Multiple sluicing in English? Syntax 17: 1–20.
Lee, Wooseung. 2010. The architecture of right dislocation constructions. Studies in Generative Grammar 20: 521–543.
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 661–738.
Mukai, Emi. 2003. On verbless conjunction in Japanese. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 33, edited Makoto Kadowaki and Shigeto Kawahara, 205–224. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Park, Bum-Sik. 2005a. Identity and locality in ellipsis. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Park, Bum-Sik. 2005b. Island-insensitive fragment answers in Korean. In Proceedings of the 24th west coast conference on formal linguistics, ed. John Alderete, Chung-hye Han, and Alexei Kochetov, 317–325. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
Park, Bum-Sik. 2013. Multiple fragment answers in Korean. Linguistic Research 30: 453–472.
Park, Bum-Sik, and Oh Sei-Rang. 2014. Multiple fragments do not mean multiple clauses. Studies in Generative Grammar 24: 307–323.
Park, Myung-Kwan, and Ui-Jong Shin. 2014. On the syntax of multiple fragments in Korean. Studies in Modern Grammar 80: 1–22.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, ed. Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Saito, Mamoru, and Duk-Ho An. 2014. A comparative syntax of ellipsis in Japanese and Korean. In Japanese syntax in comparative perspective, ed. Mamoru Saito, 117–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saito, Mamoru, T.-H. Jonah Lin, and Keiko Murasugi. 2008. N’-ellipsis and the structure of noun phrases in Chinese and Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17: 247–271.
Simpson, Andrew. 2005. Classifiers and DP structure in Southeast Asia. In Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, ed. Guglielmo Cinque, and Richard S. Kayne, 806–838. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stainton, Robert. 2006. Words and thoughts: Subsentences, ellipsis and the philosophy of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Takita, Kensuke. 2014. Pseudo-right dislocation, the bare-topic construction, and hanging topic constructions. Lingua 140: 137–157.
Yanofsky, Nancy. 1978. NP utterances. In CLS, ed. Donka Farkas, Wesley Jacobson, and Karol Todrys, 491–502. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
Acknowledgments
I thank the following people for their helpful comments and discussion: Jun Abe, Hyeyoung Kim, Heejeong Ko, Masao Ochi, Toshiko Oda, Bum-Sik Park, Daiko Takahashi, Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria, and especially, Hideaki Yamashita. I am also grateful to the anonymous reviewers and the editors of JEAL for their insightful comments that greatly helped improve this paper. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the 11th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (University of York, England. June 5, 2015), the 10th International Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics (Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, Japan. June 14, 2015), and the 1st International Workshop on Basque-Japanese and Neighboring Languages (University of the Basque Country, Spain. December 15, 2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
An, DH. Extra deletion in fragment answers and its implications. J East Asian Linguist 25, 313–350 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-016-9144-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-016-9144-7