Abstract
A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to identify if there is a subset of patients with POI who are more likely to show follicular growth after ovarian fragmentation for follicular activation (OFFA) or in vitro activation (IVA). Five studies met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis with a total of 164 patients. Forty-three patients showed follicle development (26.21%). Of those, the pregnancy rate was 35.58% (11/43) and the live birth rate was 20.93% (9/43). Our meta-analysis showed that age was not associated with follicle growth. However, lower baseline FSH, lower duration of amenorrhea/diagnosis, and presence of follicles remaining in biopsy were statistically significant for follicle development. Patients with basal characteristics mentioned before may have more chances to show follicle growth after OFFA or IVA. Taking into account that approximately 20% of patients with follicle growth had live birth, these results are very promising. Given the overall certainty of evidence, future studies are needed to confirm said results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Premature ovarian Insufficiency (POI) is defined as loss of ovarian function before 40 years of age. This challenging disorder affects approximately 1% of reproductive-age women [1]. Diagnosis criteria proposed by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) include < 40 years of age, oligo/amenorrhea of at least 4 months, and FSH > 25 IU/L on two occasions [2]. Currently, the only therapeutic option for POI patients who wish to conceive is in vitro fertilization with donor eggs.
It is estimated that three out of four patients with POI still have a dormant pool of primordial follicles [3]. Recent research has offered insight into the molecular pathways in developing primordial follicles into primary and secondary follicles, which would respond to gonadotropins, thus offering a therapeutic option for POI [4, 5].
In 2013, Kawamura et al. published a promising technique called in vitro activation (IVA) [6]. This technique involves a two-step procedure, beginning with ovarian cortex cryopreservation followed by fragmentation, activation, and autotransplantation. In short, a laparoscopic oophorectomy is performed, where the ovarian medulla is removed ex vivo, leaving only the ovarian cortex. Subsequently, the cortex is cut and vitrified. After the patient recovers from the first surgery, the ovarian cortex strips are warmed and further fragmented into 1–2 mm3 cubes. Then, the cubes are treated in vitro with a PTEN inhibitor and a PI3K activator for 24 h. Finally, they are transplanted back into the patient [6]. The authors suggested that disruption of the ovarian cortex could lead to the deactivation of the Hippo pathway, and Akt pathways could be stimulated in vitro. Clinical applications of these theories led to two live births.
Since then, several series of cases have reported the application of the original technique [7, 8]. Additionally, other authors have published a more straightforward drug-free IVA technique called ovarian fragmentation for follicular activation (OFFA) [9, 10]. In OFFA, after the ovarian cortex strips are dissected, they are cut into 1–2 mm3 cubes and immediately transplanted back into the patient.
Although the technique has shown promising results, it is still considered experimental [11]. There are many questions regarding OFFA and IVA, including which patients are appropriate candidates.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to identify basal characteristics of patients who responded to OFFA or IVA and identify if there is a subset of patients with POI who would benefit more than others. Also, the current cumulative results of OFFA and IVA in patients with POI will be shown.
Materials and methods
Search strategy
The protocol for this study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42023435664). Following the Preferred Instrument for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), a systematic database search was performed in May 2023 (Fig. 1) [12]. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrial.gov databases. Studies reporting OFFA or IVA performed in patients with POI were identified using the following key terms included in the title/abstract: “follicle,” “follicular,” and “Activation” or “IVA”; and “Premature ovarian failure,” “premature ovarian insufficiency,” or “POI.” All publication years were included. Results were exported to Rayyan [13]. The automatic duplicate finder was applied, and the rest of studies were screened. Additional studies were identified by reviewing references of studies included.
Study selection criteria
Studies that evaluated OFFA or IVA performed in patients with POI were included in the systematic review. Only studies using ESHRE criteria for POI were included. Due to limited published data, type of OFFA or IVA performed and etiology of POI were not restricted, nor language, study design, length of follow-up, and year of publication. To be included in meta-analysis, studies were required to compare basal characteristics of patients who developed antral follicles and those who did not. Studies that reported only one case were excluded. For duplicated cohorts, the latest report was included. The primary outcome was resumption of ovarian function, defined by either development of follicles on ultrasound with increase in estradiol, FSH lower than 20 IU/L, or presence of at least three consecutive menstrual cycles. The secondary outcomes were basal characteristics, number of patients with oocyte retrieval, embryo transfer, pregnancy, and pregnancy outcome.
Study selection and data extraction
Two authors (JAEB, MRD) independently reviewed titles, abstracts, and citations. After screening for studies which met inclusion criteria, both authors evaluated the full reports for data extraction. Population characteristics, such as age, etiology of POI, baseline FSH, baseline AMH, duration of amenorrhea, or diagnosis, were extracted. Type of OFFA or IVA (traditional IVA, drug-free IVA, OFFA, only scratch) was also collected. As well as the number of patients with follicles remaining in the biopsy, follicle growth, oocyte retrieval, embryo transfer, pregnancy, and pregnancy outcome. Any discrepancies were discussed.
Statistical analysis
The basal characteristics were analyzed using Review Manager ver 5.3. Heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins I2 [14]. Studies with heterogeneity over 40% I2 were considered heterogeneous and were analyzed using random effects models. Studies with less than 40% I2 were not regarded as heterogeneous and were analyzed using a fixed effects model [15]. Continuous data was analyzed using the inverse-variance method with results expressed in mean difference and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Dichotomous data was analyzed using the Mantel-Haenszel method, and outcomes were reported with odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI. If not reported, mean and standard deviation were estimated from sample size, median, range, and/or interquartile range [16]. Resulting values with associated p values < 0.05 were considered significant. Furthermore, each variable was divided into subgroups for each of the different procedures (OFFA, traditional IVA, and cortex scratch).
The risk of bias in individual studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) [17]. The overall certainty of the study was graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group guidelines [18].
Results
Systematic review
As shown in Fig. 1, our search through databases and registers resulted in a total of 390 articles, 375 from databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library) and fifteen from registers (ClinicalTrials.gov). The records were exported to Rayyan, and ten were excluded by an automatic duplicate finder [13]. A total of 380 records were screened by name and abstract. Fourteen articles were sought for retrieval and closely reviewed. Four were excluded as they corresponded to duplicated cohorts, and the most recent publications were included [6, 19,20,21]. One study reported only one case [22]. Two studies were still recruiting [23, 24]. Two studies used different POI diagnostic criteria [25, 26]. One study reported only three patients in the group without follicle growth [27]. One additional record was obtained through the study references list [8]. Thus, five studies were included to review the cumulative results and meta-analysis [7,8,9,10, 28].
The risk of bias in all studies was determined to be serious due to unmeasured confounders according to the ROBINS-I assessment (Fig. 2). The GRADE analysis suggested low evidence of certainty (Table 1).
Meta-analysis
Five studies, reporting 164 patients, were included to review the current cumulative results [7,8,9,10, 28]. Patients’ characteristics are shown in Table 2, and the type of procedure and complications can be found in Table 3.
From the 164 patients analyzed, 26.21% showed follicle growth on ultrasound (43/164). Of patients with follicle growth, pregnancy rate is 25.58% (11/43), and the live birth rate is 20.93% (9/43) (Table 4).
Basal characteristics of patients who showed follicle growth and those who did not were analyzed. The With Follicle Development group included 43 patients, and the Without Follicle Development group 121.
Age
Age was described in five studies with a total of 43 patients in the with follicle development group and 121 patients in the without follicle development group. The weighted average for age was 32.33 years in the with follicle development group and 31.67 years in the without follicle development group. A meta-analysis of these data revealed a mean difference of 0.95 [−0.51, 2.40], p = 0.20, showing similar ages in the included cohorts allocated to each group.
Regarding the subgroups of each of the procedures included (OFFA, traditional IVA, and cortex scratch), traditional IVA showed a significant difference, but not OFFA and cortex scratch. These findings are displayed in Fig. 3a.
Baseline FSH
Baseline FSH was described in four studies, with a total of 34 patients in the with follicle development group and 93 patients in the without follicle development group. The weighted average for baseline FSH was 52.87 IU/L in the with follicle development group and 68.82 IU/L in the without follicle development group. A meta-analysis of these data revealed a mean difference of −16.41 [−30.77, −2.05], p = 0.03, suggesting a lower baseline FSH in the with follicle development group. None of the subgroups showed a significant statistical difference. These findings are displayed in Fig. 3b.
Duration of diagnosis or amenorrhea
The duration of amenorrhea or diagnosis was described in five studies, with a total of 43 patients in the with follicle development group and 121 patients in the without follicle development group. The weighted average for duration of diagnosis or amenorrhea was 4.39 years in the with follicle development group and 6.33 years in the without follicle development group. A meta-analysis of these data revealed a mean difference of −1.44 [−2.63, −0.26], p = 0.02, suggesting a shorter amenorrhea or diagnosis duration in the with follicle development group. None of the subgroups showed a significant statistical difference. These findings are displayed in Fig. 4a.
Patients with follicles remaining in biopsy
The number of patients with follicles remaining in biopsy was described in five studies, with 43 patients in the with follicle development group and 121 patients in the without follicle development group. The weighted average of patients with follicles remaining in biopsy was 52.86% for patients in the with follicle development group and 21.86% for patients in the without follicle development group. A meta-analysis of these data revealed a risk ratio of 5.52 [2.14, 14.19], p = 0.0004, suggesting the increased likelihood of residual follicles in patients in the with follicle development group. From the different subgroups, the OFFA subgroup did not show a significant difference. In contrast, traditional IVA and cortex scratch subgroups showed a significant difference. These findings are displayed in Fig. 4b.
Discussion
POI does not indicate early menopause but a different condition altogether. This is illustrated by studies showing spontaneous ovarian function in patients with POI. Bachelot et al. reported a resumption of ovarian function in 23% of patients who were followed for up to 29 years [29]. A similar study in patients treated with ovarian stimulation, followed for 7 years, reported a follicle growth rate of 48.3% but only a 5.8% live birth rate [30]. This data demonstrates the remaining follicle pool potential and, thus, a therapeutic target in selected patients, as discussed below.
As mentioned before, from 164 patients treated, 43 patients (26.21%) showed follicle growth on ultrasound. Compared to the cohorts discussed before, where patients were followed for up to 29 years and 7 years, respectively, patients in the studies included were followed from 6 to 12 months [7,8,9,10, 28]. As patients with POI may have intermittent ovarian function, it is expected to find follicular growth the longer patients are followed.
After the procedure, each study had a different ovarian stimulation protocol (OS). However, most studies initiated OS when patients showed a resumption of ovarian function, either by FSH value lower than 20 or follicle development on ultrasound with increased estradiol [7, 8, 28]. Two studies initiated OS 2 days after surgery, followed by a second OS spaced by 2 months, and then patients were followed monthly with serum estradiol and ultrasound [9, 10]. The percentage of patients with oocytes retrieved ranged from 27.77 to 71.42%, with a weighted average of 54.54%. At the moment, it is unknown the reason for the difference between protocols.
During the follow-up, patients with follicle growth showed one to five waves of follicular development. These patients’ pregnancy rate was 25.58% (11/43), and the live birth rate was 20.93% (9/43). All pregnancies were achieved by OS.
Our meta-analysis showed that age was not associated with follicle growth; this was expected as the population was homogeneous. However, lower FSH, lower duration of amenorrhea or diagnosis, and follicles remaining in biopsy were statistically significant for follicle growth. The weighted average of baseline FSH and duration of amenorrhea or diagnosis in patients who responded were 52.87 IU/L and 4.39 years, respectively. In contrast, patients who did not respond had a weighted average of 68.82 IU/L and 6.07 years, respectively. Regarding the inconsistencies between the overall effect and subgroups effect among variables, we hypothesize that the low number of studies per subgroup reduced the statistical power and therefore were not statistically significant.
These findings highlight a subset of patients who have severely decreased ovarian function, as they were diagnosed with POI, but enough remaining dormant follicles to respond to OFFA or IVA. These findings may be explained by current understanding of these procedures. Lower baseline FSH, shorter duration of amenorrhea, or diagnosis and presence of follicles in biopsy are consistent with higher follicular reserve of primordial follicles, which may be activated with IVA protocol, and higher number of secondary follicles, which may be rescued by inhibition of Hippo signaling by fragmentation of the ovarian cortex in OFFA [5].
Baseline FSH and duration of amenorrhea or diagnosis can be used without delay as possible clinical criteria to identify patients who will likely respond to OFFA or IVA. Nevertheless, FSH has the disadvantage of being variable with each cycle. Although patients with follicles remaining in biopsy were the strongest predictor, it has the disadvantage of needing prior biopsy and may be performed in an area without follicles. Therefore, with the information available, shorter duration of amenorrhea or diagnosis, specially before 6 years, may be the most important factor for predicting a follicular response.
Antral follicle count (AFC) and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) are normally used as ovarian reserve markers. However, they are of no utility in patients with POI. First, they are not considered diagnostic in POI. Second, most patients do not present antral follicles on ultrasound, making AFC impossible. Third, a great proportion of patients had undetectable AMH levels and when AMH was detectable, it was not associated with follicle development.
This therapeutic option is still considered experimental, and to be used in clinical practice, the benefit must outweigh any risk. As with any other medical procedure, there are risks associated with laparoscopic surgery, such as bleeding, infection, and trauma to adjacent organs, to name a few [31,32,33]. However, based on the cumulative results, none of the trials reported any short-term or long-term complications (Table 3).
This systematic review and meta-analysis included patients subjected to either OFFA or IBA. IVA is a more complete procedure where, in addition to inhibiting Hippo signaling by ovarian cortex fragmentation, the follicles are activated in vitro using PTEN inhibitor and other Akt activators. However, it has the disadvantage of needing two surgical times. Moreover, in a recent systematic review and meta-analysis, Wang et al. concluded that the OFFA approach may be more efficient [34]. Future studies are needed to answer which protocol yields better results.
Strengths of our study include the adherence to the Preferred Instrument for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). This is the first study to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing basal characteristics of patients treated with OFFA or IVA. This procedure has been described in patients with POI and poor responders or with low ovarian reserve; however we only included patients who met ESHRE criteria for POI. Having a more homogenous population gives strength to our findings. In addition, we have shown the cumulative results of this procedure.
As with any meta-analysis, this article is inherently limited by the quality and the quantity of the available data. No randomized trials were found in our systematic review. All studies were single-arm studies, which are at risk of serious bias. Thus, the certainty of evidence using the GRADE assessment was graded as low. Although a statistically significant difference was found between basal characteristics of patients who responded to OFFA/IVA, at the moment, it is not possible to determine a threshold for baseline FSH and duration of amenorrhea as clinical criteria.
In conclusion, patients with basal characteristics mentioned before may have more chances to show follicle growth after OFFA or IVA. Considering that approximately 20% of patients with follicle growth had a live birth, these results are promising. Given the overall certainty of evidence, future studies are needed to confirm said results.
Data Availability
The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.
References
Coulam CB, Adamson SC, Annegers JF. Incidence of premature ovarian failure. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67:604–6.
European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Guideline Group on POI, Webber L, Davies M, et al. ESHRE Guideline: management of women with premature ovarian insufficiency. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(5):926–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew027.
Devenutto L, Quintana R, Quintana T. In vitro activation of ovarian cortex and autologous transplantation: a novel approach to primary ovarian insufficiency and diminished ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020:hoaa046.
Pellicer N, Cozzolino M, Diaz-García C, Galliano D, Cobo A, Pellicer A, et al. Ovarian rescue in women with premature ovarian insufficiency: facts and fiction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023;46:543–65.
Hsueh AJW, Kawamura K. Hippo signaling disruption and ovarian follicle activation in infertile patients. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:458–64.
Kawamura K, Cheng Y, Suzuki N, Deguchi M, Sato Y, Takae S, et al. Hippo signaling disruption and Akt stimulation of ovarian follicles for infertility treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110:17474–9.
Suzuki N, Yoshioka N, Takae S, Sugishita Y, Tamura M, Hashimoto S, et al. Successful fertility preservation following ovarian tissue vitrification in patients with primary ovarian insufficiency. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:608–15.
Zhai J, Yao G, Dong F, Bu Z, Cheng Y, Sato Y, et al. In vitro activation of follicles and fresh tissue auto-transplantation in primary ovarian insufficiency patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101:4405–12.
Ferreri J, Fàbregues F, Calafell JM, Solernou R, Borrás A, Saco A, et al. Drug-free in-vitro activation of follicles and fresh tissue autotransplantation as a therapeutic option in patients with primary ovarian insufficiency. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;40:254–60.
Méndez M, Fabregues F, Ferreri J, Calafell JM, Villarino A, Otero J, et al. Biomechanical characteristics of the ovarian cortex in POI patients and functional outcomes after drug-free IVA. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39:1759–67.
Steiner AZ. Evidence that biopsying, fragmentation and auto-transplantation of ovarian tissue should be abandoned as a treatment of diminished ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:1853–4.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535–b2535.
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:210.
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–58.
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd ed. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:135.
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355: i4919.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–6.
Fabregues F, Ferreri J, Calafell JM, Moreno V, Borrás A, Manau D, et al. Pregnancy after drug-free in vitro activation of follicles and fresh tissue autotransplantation in primary ovarian insufficiency patient: a case report and literature review. J Ovarian Res. 2018;11:76.
Ferreri J, Méndez M, Calafell JM, Fábregues F. Long-term outcome of ovarian function after drug-free in vitro activation (IVA) in primary ovarian insufficiency patient. JBRA Assist Reprod [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 May 13];25. Available from: https://www.jbra.com.br/trab/pub/download_trabalho.php?fileSource=/var/www/vhosts/jbra.com.br/media/trab/arq_2665&fileName=24%20-%201644-Long-term.pdf&id_trabalho=926.
Kawamura K, Kawamura N, Hsueh AJW. Activation of dormant follicles: a new treatment for premature ovarian failure? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28:217–22.
Patel N, Bhadarka H, Patel N, Patel M. Drug-free in vitro activation for primary ovarian insufficiency. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2021;14:443.
Jprn-Umin000029807. Cryopreservation and autografting of ovarian tissues for infertility treatment in patients with primary ovarian in sufficiency (POI). Httpwwwwhointtrialsearchtrial2aspx Trialidjprn-Umin000029807. 2017.
Melado L. Is there a role for mechanical stimulation in ovarian follicular activation? A randomized control trial. [Internet]. clinicaltrials.gov; 2022 Jul. Report No.: NCT04390308. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04390308.
Mahmoud K, Elloumi H, Khrouf M, Habib Ben Aribia M, Terras K, Mnallah S, et al. Interest of the use auto-transplantation of the ovarian cortex after dormant follicles in vitro activation in patients with premature ovarian insufficiency. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:e386.
Tanaka Y, Hsueh AJ, Kawamura K. Surgical approaches of drug-free in vitro activation and laparoscopic ovarian incision to treat patients with ovarian infertility. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:1355–7.
Zhang L, Zhang J, Zhai J, Liu X, Deng W, Wang H, et al. Autotransplantation of the ovarian cortex after in-vitro activation for infertility treatment: a shortened procedure. Hum Reprod. 2021;36:2134–47.
Zhang X, Han T, Yan L, Jiao X, Qin Y, Chen Z-J. Resumption of ovarian function after ovarian biopsy/scratch in patients with premature ovarian insufficiency. Reprod Sci. 2019;26:207–13.
Bachelot A, Nicolas C, Bidet M, Dulon J, Leban M, Golmard JL, et al. Long-term outcome of ovarian function in women with intermittent premature ovarian insufficiency. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2017;86:223–8.
Ishizuka B, Furuya M, Kimura M, Kamioka E, Kawamura K. Live birth rate in patients with premature ovarian insufficiency during long-term follow-up under hormone replacement with or without ovarian stimulation. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12: 795724.
Harkki-Sirén P, Kurki T. A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:108–12.
Jansen FW, Kapiteyn K, Trimbos-Kemper T, Hermans J, Trimbos JB. Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:595–600.
Magrina JF. Complications of laparoscopic surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;45:469.
Wang W, Todorov P, Isachenko E, Rahimi G, Mallmann P, Wang M, et al. In vitro activation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue: a single-arm meta-analysis and systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;258:258–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.A.E.B. conceived the idea of the study. All authors contributed to the study design and protocol development. J.A.E.B. and M.R.D. performed the search. J.A.E.B. and M.R.D. extracted the data. M.T.M and D.E.H.G performed the analysis. J.A.E.B., M.T.M., F.C., and F.F. drafted the manuscript. All authors interpreted the data, critically revised the article, and approved the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Escarcega-Bordagaray, J.A., Torres-Martinez, M., Hinojosa-Gonzalez, D.E. et al. Basal characteristics of patients who responded to Ovarian Fragmentation for Follicular Activation (OFFA) or In Vitro Activation (IVA): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 41, 989–998 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03046-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03046-4