Abstract
Purpose
Fertility at advanced age has become increasingly common, but the aging of parents may adversely affect the maturation of gametes and the development of embryos, and therefore the effects of aging are likely to be transmitted to the next generation. This article reviewed the studies in this field in recent years.
Methods
We searched the relevant literature in recent years with the keywords of “advanced maternal/paternal age” combined with “adverse pregnancy outcome” or “birth defect” in the PubMed database and classified the effects of parental advanced age on pregnancy outcomes and birth defects. Related studies on the effect of advanced age on birth defects were classified as chromosomal abnormalities, neurological and psychiatric disorders, and other systemic diseases. The effect of assisted reproduction technology (ART) on fertility in advanced age was also discussed.
Results
Differences in the definition of the range of advanced age and other confounding factors among studies were excluded, most studies believed that advanced parental age would affect pregnancy outcomes and birth defects in offspring.
Conclusion
To some extent, advanced parental age caused adverse pregnancy outcomes and birth defects. The occurrence of these results was related to the molecular genetic changes caused by aging, such as gene mutations, epigenetic variations, etc. Any etiology of adverse pregnancy outcomes and birth defects related to aging might be more than one. The detrimental effect of advanced age can be corrected to some extent by ART.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In modern society, due to the demand of the labor market, the progress of contraceptive methods, the extension of life expectancy, and the promotion of assisted reproductive technology, it has become increasingly common for humans to postpone childbearing. However, fertility is often lower at advanced age. According to the data from The National Bureau of Statistics of China (data.stats.gov.cn/), between 2003 and 2015 (except 2010), the fertility rate dropped significantly for pregnant women ≥35 years old (Fig. 1). Simultaneously, people were paying attention to the impact of late motherhood on the health of their children. A retrospective study found that from 2001 to 2010, the proportion of older women receiving prenatal diagnosis increased from 20% to 46% in China [1]. This trend will inevitably lead to a sharp increase in the number of fathers with advanced age.
In most countries, the generally accepted definition of advanced maternal age was ≥ 35 years. Although some studies pointed out that the father’s age (≥ 50 years old) might be related to the increased incidence of some specific deformities in offspring, there was no unified standard to define the critical advanced age for men to receive genetic counseling [2, 3].
Many studies have shown the relationship between advanced parental age and many adverse pregnancy outcomes and offspring health [4,5,6]. However, it was necessary to sort out the effects of advanced age on different types of adverse pregnancy outcomes and offspring health, as well as explore the causes of these risks induced by advanced age in combination with the current mechanistic studies on pregnancy at advanced age. Finally, whether the problems encountered in pregnancy at advanced age can be solved with the help of ART was still not outlined. In this review, we would summarize the key issues above.
The influence of parents’ advanced age on pregnancy outcome
Pregnancy outcome was the final result of a fertilization event. The good type of pregnancy outcome was full term live birth, and the adverse pregnancy outcomes were stillbirth, spontaneous abortion, abortion, preterm birth, low birth weight, macrosomia, and other congenital abnormalities.
Male
Although the average age of men who are first time fathers is increasing, there are still few studies on the influence of paternal age on pregnancy outcomes, and the definition of paternal aging is not the same in each study. The research of Zhu JL et al. [2] showed that the age factor might be related to the incidence of preterm delivery after 25 years old. Other studies, however, took 35 [7,8,9], 40 [10,11,12,13,14,15], 45 [16,17,18,19,20,21], and 50 [22,23,24] years old as the age threshold, respectively. Some studies revealed that male age was the influential factor for spontaneous abortion [7, 8, 10, 11, 17, 22], stillbirth [12, 14], preterm birth [2, 15, 18, 20, 21], low birth weight [9, 20, 21], late fetal death [16], and low Apgar score [19, 20]. While several other studies showed that age may not contribute to preterm delivery [13, 23,24,25,26], low birth weight [13, 23, 25, 27], small-for-gestational-age births [13], low Apgar score [13], neonatal or post-neonatal mortality [13], fetal growth restriction [26], and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission [26]. Three studies did not specify a clear definition of advanced paternal age, but they also believed that age did not lead to a high incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes [25,26,27]. Slama et al. [7] discovered when the mother’s age is less than 30 years, the effect of the father’s age on pregnancy outcome was positive. Tough et al. [23] showed that for women with low fertility risk, male age did not have an adverse effect on pregnancy outcome, but male age increased the adverse pregnancy outcome of multiparous women (Table 1). In summary, the definition of advanced paternal age remains unclear at present, and it was also controversial whether advanced paternal age was definitely related to the occurrence of various types of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, it was necessary to determine the relationship between advanced paternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes through large-scale epidemiological studies. At the same time, most studies of advanced paternal age failed to pay attention to maternal pregnancy age, which might be a confounding factor on pregnancy outcomes.
The reason for these adverse pregnancy outcomes might be related to reduced semen quality [28]. The main reasons why advanced age affects sperm quality are as follows. First, the sperm development microenvironment would change with aging. For example, Leydig and Sertoli cells, which have important functions for spermatogenesis, would be affected by environmental alterations and reduced in number. Second, advanced age influences the male hormone levels dramatically, such as an increase in the serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels [29] and a decrease in the concentration of androgen and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) [30], which also led to the problems of sperm quality. Third, abdominal obesity, erectile dysfunction [31], as well as gonad infection [32] also increase in men with advanced age, all these factors might lead to the occurrence of poor sperm quality. As is well known, the genetic and epigenetic messages in gametes are transmitted into offspring after fertilization [33, 34]. Sperm quality problems continue in embryos and eventually cause many adverse pregnancy outcomes such as spontaneous abortion, premature delivery, and stillbirth due to abnormal embryo quality during pregnancy.
Female
The female reproductive system not only produces gametes but also host fertilization, implantation, and development of the fetus in fallopian tubes and uterus during pregnancy. In the past decade, most of the studies about older women and pregnancy outcomes revealed that maternal age was often associated with miscarriage [35,36,37,38], preterm birth [36, 39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64], stillbirth [45, 51, 52, 55, 56, 60, 65,66,67,68,69,70], low birth weight [42, 43, 47, 49,50,51,52,53, 56, 60, 71,72,73], neonatal death [40, 51, 52, 60, 65, 68], perinatal neonatal death [40, 52], low Apgar score [43, 60, 65, 74], small for gestational age [35, 37, 40, 42, 57, 67, 75], large for gestational age [55, 75], macrosomia [43, 51, 55, 76], intrauterine growth restriction [43, 73, 76], NICU admission [43, 52, 61, 65], and post-term birth [50]. It was generally recognized that advanced maternal age referred to women over the age of 35, but the age threshold can be raised to 40, 45, or even 50 years to consider age as a risk factor for pregnancy, and that the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes were positively related with age [46]. However, other studies have also shown that a maternal age ≥30 was closely related to adverse pregnancy outcomes [40, 43, 51, 68]. In the meantime, the researchers also noted that maternal age was not an independent risk factor for poor pregnancy outcomes, other factors, such as education level, singleton or twin, number of pregnancies, paternal age, and previous health status should be excluded from the analysis [41, 47, 50, 68, 73]. After excluding these confounding factors, Ankarcrona et al. [77] concluded that the women with advanced age were not associated with the occurrence of low Apgar score. Kanmaz et al. [78] showed that advanced age did not increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome, but instead increased the probability of having pregnancy complication. Some studies suggested that advanced age was not necessarily associated with all adverse pregnancy outcomes. As Zhu et al. [46] stated in a retrospective study on twin births, women ≥ 35 years were associated with preterm birth, but not with neonatal adverse outcomes and stillbirth. Frederiksen et al. [36] suggested that advanced age was associated with miscarriage and preterm birth, but not increased risk of stillbirth. Khalil et al. [37] showed that women ≥40 years were associated with miscarriage, low gestational age, but not with stillbirth, spontaneous preterm birth, and large gestational age neonates. In addition, the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes was also different at different age stages. Hsieh et al. [60] considered women ≥35 years to be related with early preterm delivery (before 34 weeks of gestation), a birth weight <1500 g, low Apgar scores, fetal demise, and neonatal death. When women are ≥40 years, preterm delivery (before 37 weeks of gestation) becomes a new risk factor (Table 2). In summary, there were more studies on the correlation between advanced age and pregnancy outcomes in women than that in men. Although different studies had different results in some types of adverse pregnancy outcomes, the relationship between advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes was more definite overall.
On the one hand, advanced maternal age led to oocytes quality problems. There were many causes of decreased oocyte quality in advanced age. For example, problematic meiotic spindles occurred more frequently in aged oocytes, resulting in embryos with abnormal chromosome segregation. As a result, the embryo could not be implanted or it will be aborted naturally [79, 80]. On the other hand, the adverse pregnancy outcomes of older women such as miscarriage and stillbirth, might be related to placental dysfunction. Vascular dysfunction in older women led to insufficient perfusion of uterus and placenta [81]. In addition, other metabolic dysfunctions that were caused by abnormal pancreas islet function at an advanced maternal age could induce chronic diseases such as gestational diabetes, eclampsia, and aggravate placental problems during pregnancy [62, 82]. Even if the fetus could continue to grow in the uterus, there might be intrauterine growth restriction, adverse neonatal or perinatal neonatal outcome [83]. In addition to the uterine hemodynamics, the aging of the myometrium in older women also led to impaired myometrium contractile, prolonging the process of labor. Abnormal uterine action not only increased the incidence of cesarean delivery (CS), but also led to adverse neonatal outcomes such as low Apgar score, NICU admission, and even neonatal or perinatal death [84].
Parents’ advanced age leads to birth defects of their offspring
The concept of birth defects was usually difficult to define, as it included a variety of different diseases, such as neonatal chromosome ploidy abnormalities, monogenic genetic diseases, some congenital diseases, behavioral characteristics, and mental disorders. The correlation between advanced age and the risk of birth defects remains controversial, but the incidence of many well-defined syndromes did increase with age [85].
Chromosome aneuploidy in offspring
Aneuploidy was mainly caused by non-disjunction of chromosomes of the gametes during meiosis, and it was often fatal. Trisomy was the most common type of chromosome aneuploidy.
Male
The effect of paternal age on chromosome aneuploidy was still controversial [86, 87]. A study had shown that there was no significant correlation between paternal age and multiple aneuploid forms (haploid, triploid, partial deletion/duplication) in donor oocyte cycle [88]. Another study showed that when the female partner was older than 35 years old, the paternal age would have significant effects on the incidence of Down syndrome [89]. With regard to Klinefelter syndrome (47, XXY chromosome karyotype of offspring), studies have shown that 50% of the causes were attributed to a male factor [90], but whether it was related to the age of the male partner was unknown [91,92,93]. Another study of Klinefelter syndrome found that older men were more likely to produce XY sperm [94]. The chromosome abnormality in men with advanced age might be related to the mitotic activity of spermatogonia. Unlike the oocyte, the formation of spermatozoa in men would not be interrupted and lasts a lifetime. In adults, the process of spermatogenesis had 23 mitoses per year, spermatogonia in a 35-year-old man might have undergone 540 mitoses, and the number of mitoses at high frequencies led to an increased risk of transcriptional errors in DNA with age [95, 96]. DNA replication occurred before each cell division, and mutations were usually caused by uncorrected errors in DNA replication. The frequency of these mutations continually accumulated in the offspring, that is, as the paternal age of next generation increases, so did the frequency of XY mutations [97]. Due to a large number of cell divisions during spermatogenesis, it could be speculated that advanced paternal age could increase the frequency of ab initio mutation [98].
Female
Advanced maternal age was an important risk factor for fetal chromosome abnormalities [99]. Among the common types of chromosome abnormalities, the incidence of trisomy 18, trisomy 21, and XXY were closely related to advanced maternal age at the time of pregnancy [100,101,102]. By synthesizing several meta-analyses and large population data studies on the relationship between gestational age and the incidence of trisomy 21, a review concluded that with increasing age, the incidence of Down syndrome doubled at age 30 and again at age 35 [103]. Another large-scale epidemiological survey of 46,258 pregnant women over 35 years old in China found that the proportion of fetal 21 trisomy syndrome increased significantly in women over 39 years [1]. Additionally, advanced paternal age might increase the incidence risk of trisomy 21 in older women [104]. The main cause of chromosome abnormality in offspring of older women was related to oocyte quality. With advanced maternal age, there was an increase in frequency of chromosome abnormality in oocytes. This was primarily due to reduced centromere cohesion, weakened homologous recombination, failed spindle assembly checkpoint, chromatin epigenetic changes, and oocyte extracellular factors also played a role in chromosome errors [105] (Table 3). The imbalance of multiple regulatory mechanisms against normal chromosome ploidy within oocyte as a result of age might ultimately lead to chromosomal abnormalities in old oocytes and this abnormality is inherited by the offspring.
Neurological and psychiatric disorders of offspring
Male
By referring to previous studies, we found that there was an important correlation between parental age and the nervous system development of offspring. Kazaura et al. retrospectively analyzed 1,869,388 newborns from Norway and found that the risk assessment of nervous system malformations of paternal age 45–49 was 2.5 and 1.3 times higher than that of paternal age 25–29, respectively [106]. Advanced paternal age might also affect the neuropsychiatric system of the offspring after birth. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) was a kind of widespread developmental disorder that often occurs in children. It was mainly manifested by abnormal language ability, communication disability, narrow interest, and stubborn behavior pattern. Older fathers increased the risk of ASD in offspring compared with younger fathers [107], and the father’s age was an independent risk factor for ASD in offspring [108, 109]. Kong et al. confirmed that there was a correlation between the paternal age and ab initio mutation by sequencing the whole genome of parents and their offspring from 78 Icelandic families, and this relationship was more pronounced in genes with ASD [98]. Another study compared the level of gene expression in lymphocytes between children diagnosed with ASD and healthy children. It was found that the decreased distribution of genes related to transcriptional regulation in lymphocytes was associated with ASD and the increased age of fathers. This suggested that the different ASD gene expression profile might attribute to advanced paternal age [110]. Excluding sociology and other factors, a study showed that advanced paternal age was also associated with schizophrenia [111,112,113]. A meta-analysis showed that the offspring of older fathers were 1.66 times more likely to develop schizophrenia than the offspring of younger fathers [114]. Schizophrenia patients related to advanced paternal age showed differences in language and behavior ability with other schizophrenia patients, and female offspring had early onset [115]. An increase in ab initio mutations in the germ cells of older fathers [116], allele length variations, and an increased risk of chromosome breakage [117], might eventually lead to an increased risk of schizophrenia in offspring. Other studies have shown that male offspring from paternal age>55 were 1.37 times more likely to be diagnosed with bipolar disorder than those of men aged from 20 to 24 [118]. However, a prospective cohort study based on part of the Israeli population showed that, when the age of the father at the time of the birth of first offspring was controlled, older fathers did not mean an increased risk of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. The association between the offspring of older fathers and these two diseases was more likely to come from psychosocial factors [119]. Another study using twins as a model also showed that as paternal age increased, the influence of genetic factors on the incidence of mental disorders decreased while that of environmental factors increased [120]. Moreover, the father’s age might also be related to the neurocognitive index score of the offspring. When the neurocognitive index was evaluated at different age stages of the offspring, it could be found that older fathers’ age was related to lower score [121]. Another study pointed out that there was a U-shaped relationship between the father’s age and the IQ score of the offspring [122]. In a cohort study of 96,654 children, the researchers found that offspring of fathers aged 35 or older were more likely to be diagnosed with epilepsy [123]. In an animal study, researchers also verified the influence of older fathers on ASD and abnormal behavior of the offspring [124,125,126,127]. At the same time, it should be noted that different studies employed different definitions of what “advanced paternal age” should be, so studies investigating the impact of fathers in the mental health of their children should properly defined the age threshold. One study analyzed the patient population by dividing them into three different age groups: 35, 45, and 55, and they found that only age 55 yielded a statistically significant different [128]. However, the specific determination of the age threshold needed to be supported by further research. Nevertheless, the epidemiological association between the father’s age and adverse neuropsychiatric outcomes of offspring was still very reliable. Using neuroimaging, Gale-Grant et al. found that the increase in age-related germline mutations might affect the development of white matter in offspring [129].
As previously described, male germ cells underwent hundreds of cell divisions before fertilization, and DNA repair mechanisms maintained the fidelity of DNA replication. However, overall number of point mutations in male spermatogonia accumulated over time. A study found that genetic mutations in older fathers mainly affect the function of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, and the occurrence of mental illnesses such as schizophrenia and ASD was usually associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, which can partially explain the association between mental illness and older fathers [130]. Moreover, animal studies have also found extensive changes in the transcriptome of medial posterior frontal cortex in offspring of older men, and most of these differentially expressed genes were associated with the etiology of ASD [131], and these ASD risks might last for generations [132]. In recent years, the theory that epigenetic changes caused abnormalities in the nervous system of offspring with older fathers had been paid more attention. Epigenetics refers to the changes in gene expression levels based on non-gene sequence changes, including DNA methylation, histone modification, chromosome remodeling, and non-coding RNA regulation, which mainly affect the genomic function and characteristics through the regulation of gene transcription or translation processes. Among these types of epigenetics, aberrant DNA methylation damage during spermatogenesis could be transmitted to offspring [133, 134]. In addition, it was supported that the epigenetic changes caused by the aging of fathers were associated with the susceptibility to schizophrenia in offspring [135]. In summary, the mechanism by which old fathers led to neurological and psychiatric disorders in offspring might be associated with accumulated DNA site mutations and aberrant epigenetic changes in the spermatogenic cells.
Female
In a population-based cohort research, the effect of maternal aging on the neurocognitive and emotional development of offspring remained controversial [136]. However, some epidemiological studies have shown that the advanced age of women was related to schizophrenia [137, 138], epilepsy [139], ASD [140,141,142], and the cognitive ability of offspring [143]. In a case-control study, in addition to the association between advanced paternal age and schizophrenia, maternal age was also an independent risk factor for this mental disorder [144]. Lopez-Castroman et al. reviewed follow-up data from 30,965 patients from 1980 to 2007 and showed that the risk of mental illness increased linearly with the mother’s age [145]. More often, mother’s age had the same effect as father’s age, which was independently associated with high risk of ASD in the offspring [146, 147].
As for the reasons why the mother’s age affected the cognition and mental condition of their offspring, a study found that advanced maternal age can lead to dysregulation of DNA methylation patterns in homologous ectodermal cells of offspring with ASD, and its regulated expressed protein had an interaction relationship with known ASD-related causative genes, and epigenetic dysregulation in ASD patients of offspring from mothers with advanced maternal age may in turn be related to parental gamete aging and environmental effects during embryogenesis [148]. Aoulad Fares et al. showed that genomic instability caused by telomere shortening potentially increased the risk of neural tube defects [149]. In addition to previously mentioned genetic mechanisms, a study pointed out that the brain cortical volume of offspring increased with parents’ age and the influence of father and mother on the brain cortex of offspring was different. Older fathers had more influence on the cortex surface area of the offspring, while older mothers had more influence on the cortex thickness. The effects of maternal age on cortical thickness might lead to differential neurocognition among offspring [150]. Subtle behavioral changes and cortical morphological changes in offspring have also been demonstrated in a mouse model [151]. The change of internal and external environment might had influenced the brain development before the offspring born to parents of advanced age [152]. There was a mutually regulated signal pathway between the fetal brain and the maternal skeletal system, and osteocalcin secreted by osteoblasts could combine with fetal neurons across the placental barrier to participate in the regulation of anxiety, depression, learning, and memory function. Older pregnant women might affect the cognitive function of their offspring through osteocalcin and thus contributed to the maternal influence on fetal brain development [153]. Pregnancy was a special immune process, and the inflammatory pathway that caused bad neurobehavior of offspring was intrauterine inflammation [154]. For example, intrauterine IL-6 levels during pregnancy affect the ASD phenotype [155], white matter, cognitive ability [156, 157], and the development of amygdala in offspring [155, 158]. The abnormal inflammatory state in the uterus of an older woman could also lead to brain damage in the newborns [159]. Prenatal mental state of pregnant women (tension, anxiety, and depression) also affected fetal brain development [160]. How advanced maternal age might bring changes in the immune environment of the uterus to affect fetal nervous system still needed further investigation. Similarly, gestational complications caused by advanced age, such as gestational diabetes, increased the risk of different schizophrenia phenotypes in offspring [161]. Sunwoo et al. also showed that maternal immune activation changed the expression profile of miRNA in the midbrain of mouse offspring, which was associated with an increased risk of ASD in offspring [154] (Table 3). In summary, the effect of advanced maternal age on neuropsychiatric disorders in offspring was not only affected by gene-level factors in gametes, but also because mothers are involved in the gestation process of embryos, and the effects of internal and external environmental factors throughout pregnancy might have an impact on the occurrence of neuropsychiatric disorders in offspring, which requires our attention in future studies.
The influence of the parents’ advanced age on other diseases of their offspring
Male
Many epidemiological studies have demonstrated the effects of advanced age on other systems of offspring. As the father ages, the risk of congenital musculoskeletal abnormalities in offspring increases [162]. Aging might lead to an increase in the frequency of mutations at specific gene loci that affected cartilage development in offspring, resulting in an increase in the incidence of chondrodysplasia [163]. Advanced paternal age was also related to some autosomal dominant diseases, such as Crouzon syndrome, Apert syndrome, Pfeiffer syndrome, myositis ossificans, and Marfan syndrome [164]. The effect of paternal age on the high incidence of these diseases was attributed to accumulated spermatogonia replication errors, FGFR3 and FGFR2 gene mutations in the sperm of older fathers, for example, were associated with some bone dysplasia diseases [165,166,167]. A retrospective study analysis showed that the risk of multiple sclerosis increased steadily with paternal age, regardless of the maternal age, and the risk was twice as high at the age of 55 as that of the father at the age of 25 [168]. The advanced paternal age might also be associated with the occurrence of malignant diseases in offspring, such as an increased risk of leukemia [169], acute lymphoblastic leukemia [170], nervous system cancer [171], and premenopausal breast cancer in offspring [172]. In addition, endocrine tumors, type I neurofibroma and retinoblastoma were also significantly related to paternal age, but the results were not consistent across different studies [173]. The offspring of older fathers aged over 40 years might have an increased risk of death before the age of 5 due to congenital malformations, malignant tumors, and external factors caused by age-specific point mutations [174]. Advanced paternal age was also associated with offspring reproductive health. An epidemiological survey from the United States found that older fathers led to a decreased mating rate in the offspring [175]. In mouse experiments, it was also found that advanced paternal age affected sperm concentration, sperm motility, and anogenital distance of offspring, indicating the effect of paternal age on the reproductive health of the next generation [176].
In summary, advanced paternal age was associated with not only the risk of neuropsychiatric diseases in offspring, but also musculoskeletal diseases, malignant diseases, and reproductive health in offspring, and the causes of these diseases were also associated with genetic changes due to increasing age.
Female
The impacts on offspring of advanced maternal age were more negatively affected because of high complication rate during pregnancy. It was convinced that advanced maternal age can have a negative impact on the blood pressure of offspring [177, 178], and an increased incidence of congenital heart disease was also observed in the offspring of older mothers [179]. Women’s cardiovascular system was no longer adapted to pregnancy in the process of aging, and damage to the structure and function of uterus and placenta would increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome [5]. Gestational complications such as gestational diabetes mellitus could also lead to a high incidence of cardiovascular disease in the early stages of fetal development [180]. In addition, a population follow-up study from Germany showed that advanced age affected the carotid intima-media thickness of female offspring in adulthood [181]. Maternal age at delivery was also associated with allergic diseases such as asthma, food allergy, and allergic rhinitis in offspring [182]. In a case-controlled study from Iran, Saremi et al found that older women increased the risk of retinoblastoma in their offspring [183]. Women who delayed childbearing age might also increase the risk of hypospadias in their offspring [184, 185]. Finally, aging in women might negatively affect the fertility of offspring [186, 187].
The molecular mechanism of various subsequent health risks faced by the offspring of older mothers remains elusive. Therefore, relevant conclusions on such subject and common definition of advanced maternal age still need to be supported by further large sample studies with multicenter data. Kaytor et al. have shown that intergenerational CAG nucleotide instability increased with aging in pregnant women, and nucleotide repeat instability was associated with cancers and nervous system diseases [188]. Moore et al. used high-throughput sequencing technology to analyze the blood DNA methylation of 2740 adult women and their mothers. It was found that the mother’s age affected the epigenetic changes of disease-related gene loci in the female offspring [189] (Table 3). In addition to the above factors of abnormal inheritance of gamete abnormalities caused by advanced age to offspring, it should be noted that advanced age easily affected the pregnancy environment of the mother, which can also adversely affect offspring health.
The intervention of ART and fertility in the older
The emergence of ART brought hope to older couples who wanted to have healthy offspring. ART could effectively help solve the aforementioned problems of decreased gamete quality caused by advanced age, select high-quality gametes by morphological or biological criteria, and detect the quality of early embryos after fertilization by the same ways, such as time lapse imaging [190] and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) [191], which had a great degree of guarantee for the safety of advanced-aged parental embryos before implantation.
For men, some studies found that ART could rescue the adverse effects of advanced paternal age on offspring. In a multicenter retrospective study from 2016 to 2018, after analyzing the association between paternal age and embryonic aneuploidy in 1202 IVF/ICSI cycles, the study found that paternal age was not significantly associated with multiple aneuploidy forms (haploid, trisomy, partial deletion/repetition) [88]. Although the decline of sperm concentration and motility in older men might affect the fertilization rate and blastocyst formation rate, it did not affect the quality of blastocyst or the pregnancy rate of ICSI cycle [192]. Other studies found that old father and young father showed no significant difference of aneuploidy rate, fertilization rate, implantation rate, pregnancy rate, abortion rate and live birth rate after accepting IVF treatment [88, 192,193,194]. However, some studies still confirmed that the advanced paternal age had a negative effect on treatment outcome. Sperm from older men showed lower fertilization potential and blastocyst formation rate after receiving IUI or IVF treatment [195]. It also increased the relative risk of neurocognitive impairment, some cancers and aneuploidy-related syndrome in the offspring [194]. Another increased risk was the sperm DNA fragments (SDF). Studies have shown that the proportion of SDF was positively correlated with age. Among men between the ages of 60 and 80, the percentage of SDF was 88% [165]. In laboratory studies, more than 30% of DNA fragments were considered to be abnormal and are associated with poor ART outcomes [196]. It was therefore necessary to screen out high-quality sperm by effective laboratory methods.
Considering the relationship between older men and semen quality, ART could also help prevent damage to sperm by advanced age by freezing sperm at a young age. However, there were no studies to compare the efficacy and safety of using young frozen sperm and older fresh sperm for IVF, and it should be noted that the process of freezing sperm was not risk-free [197].
The fertility requirements of older women were reflected in the increasing number of women receiving ART every year. First, whether ART improved pregnancy rates in women of advanced age was uncertain. For example, according to the data in the past decade, for women over 40 years, ART had almost no significant improvement on the pregnancy rate [198]. When young women were treated with assisted fertility therapy such as controlled induced ovulation and IUI, the probability of conception would increase, women with advanced maternal age, however, had a decreased rate of pregnancy after medical intervention. Even if normal-looking blastocysts were obtained, trophoblast biopsies often found a high proportion of aneuploidy [199, 200]. Second, ART did not reduce the risk of pregnancy outcomes in women with advanced age [201]. A multicenter retrospective cohort study from Northern Europe showed that while older women who received ART were still at great risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, the effect was greater in women with natural conception [202].
For preventive measures, through publicity and education, more women could recognize the risk of giving birth at an advanced age and complete giving birth at the best reproductive age as much as possible. Fertility preservation could also be performed by vitrifying oocytes or blastocysts at a young age. With the help of PGT, it could effectively screen aneuploid blastocysts resulting from meiotic errors and improve the cumulative pregnancy rate in older women. In addition, older women faced more problems after receiving ART treatment than older men, which might be due to that in addition to gametes, endometrial factors, placental factors, pregnancy complications, hormone levels, and inflammatory status would also affect the growth and development process after implantation. Therefore, ART for older women should be accompanied by adjustment of their physical status through drugs or other treatment modalities.
Considering that ART might also interfere with the health of offspring, necessary evaluation was needed to explain the role of ART in older patients. Therefore, when considering the use of ART for older couples, doctors should consider the intervention effect at ART in addition to the uncertainty of gamete quality caused by advanced age, so as to provide more reliable genetic counseling for the patients [203].
Conclusion
For a long time, large-scale epidemiological investigations have shown that advanced age in fathers or mothers posed a great risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes and offspring health. However until now, the exact risks that were brought by advanced parental age had not yet reached the unified standard. This review summarized the effects of older fathers and mothers on pregnancy outcomes, birth defects of offspring, possible mechanisms, and ART on older parents. Giving birth at an advanced age would still be the trend of social development now and in the future. On the basis of the existing investigation and research data based on human beings, we need more non-human primate experiments (the basic experiments of advanced age were mainly carried out in rodents, but the effects of some environmental factors could not be modeled in rodents [204]) to thoroughly explore the mechanism behind the declined reproductive function in human. With the help of ART, we could apply more research findings to clinical practice to cope with the reproductive challenges.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program (no. 2017YFA0103800), the National Science Foundation of China (nos.81730038), and the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2019-I2M-5-001).
We thank all the staffs in the Center for Reproductive Medicine of Peking University Third hospital.
References
Zhu Y, et al. A multicenter study of fetal chromosomal abnormalities in Chinese women of advanced maternal age. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;55(3):379–84.
Zhu JL, et al. Paternal age and congenital malformations. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(11):3173–7.
Ramasamy R, et al. Male biological clock: a critical analysis of advanced paternal age. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(6):1402–6.
Pinheiro RL, et al. Advanced maternal age: adverse outcomes of pregnancy, a meta-analysis. Acta Medica Port. 2019;32(3):219–26.
Cooke CM, Davidge ST. Advanced maternal age and the impact on maternal and offspring cardiovascular health. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2019;317(2):H387–94.
Nybo Andersen AM, Urhoj SK. Is advanced paternal age a health risk for the offspring? Fertil Steril. 2017;107(2):312–8.
Slama R, et al. Does male age affect the risk of spontaneous abortion? An approach using semiparametric regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(9):815–24.
Slama R, et al. Influence of paternal age on the risk of spontaneous abortion. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(9):816–23.
Reichman NE, Teitler JO. Paternal age as a risk factor for low birthweight. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(5):862–6.
de la Rochebrochard E, Thonneau P. Paternal age and maternal age are risk factors for miscarriage; results of a multicentre European study. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(6):1649–56.
Kleinhaus K, et al. Paternal age and spontaneous abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(2):369–77.
Urhoj SK, et al. Advanced paternal age and stillbirth rate: a nationwide register-based cohort study of 944,031 pregnancies in Denmark. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017;32(3):227–34.
Chen XK, et al. Paternal age and adverse birth outcomes: teenager or 40+, who is at risk? Hum Reprod. 2008;23(6):1290–6.
Astolfi P, De Pasquale A, Zonta LA. Late paternity and stillbirth risk. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(11):2497–501.
Astolfi P, De Pasquale A, Zonta L. Late childbearing and its impact on adverse pregnancy outcome: stillbirth, preterm delivery and low birth weight. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2005;53 Spec No 2:2S97-105.
Nybo Andersen AM, et al. Advanced paternal age and risk of fetal death: a cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160(12):1214–22.
Maconochie N, et al. Risk factors for first trimester miscarriage--results from a UK-population-based case-control study. BJOG. 2007;114(2):170–86.
Astolfi P, De Pasquale A, Zonta LA. Paternal age and preterm birth in Italy, 1990 to 1998. Epidemiology. 2006;17(2):218–21.
Sun Y, et al. Paternal age and Apgar scores of newborn infants. Epidemiology. 2006;17(4):473–4.
Khandwala YS, et al. Association of paternal age with perinatal outcomes between 2007 and 2016 in the United States: population based cohort study. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2018;363:k4372.
Alio AP, et al. The effect of paternal age on fetal birth outcomes. Am J Mens Health. 2012;6(5):427–35.
Nguyen BT, Chang EJ, Bendikson KA. Advanced paternal age and the risk of spontaneous abortion: an analysis of the combined 2011-2013 and 2013-2015 National Survey of family growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019:221(5):476 e1-476 e7.
Tough SC, et al. Is paternal age associated with an increased risk of low birthweight, preterm delivery, and multiple birth? Canadian J Publ Health. 2003;94(2):88–92.
Basso O, Wilcox AJ. Paternal age and delivery before 32 weeks. Epidemiology. 2006;17(4):475–8.
Abel EL, Kruger M, Burd L. Effects of maternal and paternal age on Caucasian and native American preterm births and birth weights. Am J Perinatol. 2002;19(1):49–54.
Hurley EG, DeFranco EA. Influence of paternal age on perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(5):566 e1–6.
Nahum GG, Stanislaw H. Relationship of paternal factors to birth weight. J Reprod Med. 2003;48(12):963–8.
Kidd SA, Eskenazi B, Wyrobek AJ. Effects of male age on semen quality and fertility: a review of the literature. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(2):237–48.
Sampson N, et al. The ageing male reproductive tract. J Pathol. 2007;211(2):206–18.
Harman SM, et al. Longitudinal effects of aging on serum total and free testosterone levels in healthy men. Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(2):724–31.
Amaral S, Ramalho-Santos J. Aging, mitochondria and male reproductive function. Curr Aging Sci. 2009;2(3):165–73.
Rolf C, Kenkel S, Nieschlag E. Age-related disease pattern in infertile men: increasing incidence of infections in older patients. Andrologia. 2002;34(4):209–17.
Wei Y, et al. Paternally induced transgenerational inheritance of susceptibility to diabetes in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(5):1873–8.
Zhang Y, et al. Sperm RNA code programmes the metabolic health of offspring. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15(8):489–98.
Kahveci B, et al. The effect of advanced maternal age on perinatal outcomes in nulliparous singleton pregnancies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):343.
Frederiksen LE, et al. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes at advanced maternal age. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(3):457–63.
Khalil A, et al. Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(6):634–43.
Casteleiro A, et al. Association between advanced maternal age and maternal and neonatal morbidity: a cross-sectional study on a Spanish population. PLoS One. 2019;14(11).
Londero AP, et al. Maternal age and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):261.
Schummers L, et al. Variation in relationships between maternal age at first birth and pregnancy outcomes by maternal race: a population-based cohort study in the United States. BMJ Open. 2019;9(12):e033697.
Schildberger B, et al. Influence of maternal age on selected obstetric parameters. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2019;79(11):1208–15.
Koshida S, et al. Impact of advanced maternal age on adverse infant outcomes: a Japanese population-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;242:178–81.
Shan D, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women of advanced maternal age: a retrospective cohort study from China. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):12239.
Fitzpatrick KE, et al. Pregnancy at very advanced maternal age: a UK population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2017;124(7):1097–106.
Khatibi A, et al. Obstetric and neonatal outcome in women aged 50 years and up: a collaborative, Nordic population-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;224:17–20.
Zhu CX, et al. Obstetric outcomes of twin pregnancies at advanced maternal age: a retrospective study. Taiwanese J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;57(1):64–7.
Goisis A, et al. Advanced maternal age and the risk of low birth weight and preterm delivery: a within-family analysis using Finnish population registers. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;186(11):1219–26.
Ogawa K, et al. Association between very advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a cross sectional Japanese study. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2017;17(1):349.
Haslinger C, et al. Postponed pregnancies and risks of very advanced maternal age. Swiss Med Wkly. 2016;146:w14330.
Almeida NK, Almeida RM, Pedreira CE. Adverse perinatal outcomes for advanced maternal age: a cross-sectional study of Brazilian births. J Pediatr. 2015;91(5):493–8.
Weng YH, Yang CY, Chiu YW. Risk assessment of adverse birth outcomes in relation to maternal age. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e114843.
Laopaiboon M, et al. Advanced maternal age and pregnancy outcomes: a multicountry assessment. BJOG. 2014;121 Suppl 1(s1):49–56.
Barton JR, et al. Spontaneously conceived pregnancy after 40: influence of age and obesity on outcome. Am J Perinatol. 2014;31(9):795–8.
Mehta S, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women greater than 45 years: a cohort control study in a multi-ethnic inner city population. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(5):1125–8.
Kenny LC, et al. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: evidence from a large contemporary cohort. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56583.
Carolan MC, et al. Very advanced maternal age and morbidity in Victoria, Australia: a population based study. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2013;13:80.
Ludford I, et al. Pregnancy outcomes for nulliparous women of advanced maternal age in South Australia, 1998-2008. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52(3):235–41.
Laskov I, et al. Outcome of twin pregnancy in women ≥45 years old: a retrospective cohort study. J Matern-Fetal Neo M. 2013;26(7):669–72.
Kathiresan ASQ, et al. The influence of maternal age on pregnancy outcome in nulliparous women with twin gestation. Am J Perinatol. 2011;28(5):355–9.
Hsieh TT, et al. Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcomes in an Asian population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;148(1):21–6.
Yogev Y, et al. Pregnancy outcome at extremely advanced maternal age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010:203(6):558 e1-7.
Fuchs F, et al. Effect of maternal age on the risk of preterm birth: a large cohort study. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0191002.
Claramonte Nieto M, et al. Impact of aging on obstetric outcomes: defining advanced maternal age in Barcelona. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2019;19(1):342.
Fall CH, et al. Association between maternal age at childbirth and child and adult outcomes in the offspring: a prospective study in five low-income and middle-income countries (COHORTS collaboration). Lancet Global Health. 2015;3(7):e366–77.
Kortekaas JC, et al. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes of late- and postterm pregnancies in advanced maternal age: a national cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(8):1022–30.
Lean SC, et al. Placental dysfunction underlies increased risk of fetal growth restriction and stillbirth in advanced maternal age women. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):9677.
Arya S, Mulla ZD, Plavsic SK. Outcomes of women delivering at very advanced maternal age. J Womens Health. 2018;27(11):1378–84.
McLennan AS, et al. The role of maternal age in twin pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(1):80 e1–8.
Walker KF, et al. Randomized trial of labor induction in women 35 years of age or older. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(9):813–22.
Ohana O, et al. Risk factors for intrauterine fetal death (1988-2009). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(9):1079–83.
Yin O, et al. Central hemodynamics are associated with fetal outcomes in pregnancies of advanced maternal age. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2020;19:67–73.
Marozio L, et al. Maternal age over 40 years and pregnancy outcome: a hospital-based survey. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(10):1602–8.
Salem Yaniv S, et al. A significant linear association exists between advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;283(4):755–9.
Cakmak Celik F, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in advanced maternal age: a retrospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(20):2452–6.
Schimmel MS, et al. The effects of maternal age and parity on maternal and neonatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291(4):793–8.
Zapata-Masias Y, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in women ≥40years of age: associations with fetal growth disorders. Early Hum Dev. 2016;100:17–20.
Ankarcrona V, et al. Delivery outcome after trial of labor in nulliparous women 40 years or older-a nationwide population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(9):1195–203.
Kanmaz AG, et al. Effect of advanced maternal age on pregnancy outcomes: a single-Centre data from a tertiary healthcare hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;39(8):1104–11.
Fragouli E, et al. The origin and impact of embryonic aneuploidy. Hum Genet. 2013;132(9):1001–13.
Warburton D. Biological aging and the etiology of aneuploidy. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;111(3-4):266–72.
Morton JS, et al. Advanced maternal age worsens postpartum vascular function. Front Physiol. 2017;8:465.
Dong B, et al. The effect of pre-pregnancy body mass index and excessive gestational weight gain on the risk of gestational diabetes in advanced maternal age. Oncotarget. 2017;8(35):58364–71.
Roustaei Z, et al. The effect of advanced maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes of placenta previa: a register-based cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;227:1–7.
Sweeney EM, et al. Stereology of human myometrium in pregnancy: influence of maternal body mass index and age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013:208(4):324 e1-6.
Yang Q, et al. Paternal age and birth defects: how strong is the association? Hum Reprod. 2007;22(3):696–701.
Tempest HG. Meiotic recombination errors, the origin of sperm aneuploidy and clinical recommendations. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2011;57(1-2):93–101.
Sloter E, et al. Effects of male age on the frequencies of germinal and heritable chromosomal abnormalities in humans and rodents. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(4):925–43.
Carrasquillo RJ, et al. Advanced paternal age does not affect embryo aneuploidy following blastocyst biopsy in egg donor cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(10):2039–45.
Fisch H, et al. The influence of paternal age on down syndrome. J Urol. 2003;169(6):2275–8.
Spano M, et al. Sperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility. The Danish first pregnancy planner study team. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(1):43–50.
Lanfranco F, et al. Klinefelter's syndrome. Lancet. 2004;364(9430):273–83.
Werler S, et al. Germ cell loss is associated with fading Lin28a expression in a mouse model for Klinefelter's syndrome. Reproduction. 2014;147(3):253–64.
Sciurano RB, et al. Focal spermatogenesis originates in euploid germ cells in classical Klinefelter patients. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(9):2353–60.
Lowe X, et al. Frequency of XY sperm increases with age in fathers of boys with Klinefelter syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69(5):1046–54.
Bordson BL, Leonardo VS. The appropriate upper age limit for semen donors: a review of the genetic effects of paternal age. Fertil Steril. 1991;56(3):397–401.
Plas E, et al. Effects of aging on male fertility? Exp Gerontol. 2000;35(5):543–51.
Arnedo N, et al. Sperm aneuploidy in fathers of Klinefelter's syndrome offspring assessed by multicolour fluorescent in situ hybridization using probes for chromosomes 6, 13, 18, 21, 22. X and Y Human Reproduction. 2006;21(2):524–8.
Kong A, et al. Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father's age to disease risk. Nature. 2012;488(7412):471–5.
Heffner, L.J., Advanced maternal age--how old is too old? N Engl J Med, 2004. 351(19):1927-1929.
Driscoll DA, Gross S. Clinical practice. Prenatal screening for aneuploidy. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(24):2556–62.
Forabosco A, Percesepe A, Santucci S. Incidence of non-age-dependent chromosomal abnormalities: a population-based study on 88965 amniocenteses. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17(7):897–903.
Xiao H, et al. Karyotype analysis with amniotic fluid in 12365 pregnant women with indications for genetic amniocentesis and strategies of prenatal diagnosis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;36(3):293–6.
Cuckle H, Morris J. Maternal age in the epidemiology of common autosomal trisomies. Prenat Diagn. 2021;41(5):573–83.
Agopian AJ, Marengo LK, Mitchell LE. Predictors of trisomy 21 in the offspring of older and younger women. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2012;94(1):31–5.
Wang ZB, Schatten H, Sun QY. Why is chromosome segregation error in oocytes increased with maternal aging? Physiology (Bethesda). 2011;26(5):314–25.
Kazaura M, Lie RT, Skjaerven R. Paternal age and the risk of birth defects in Norway. Ann Epidemiol. 2004;14(8):566–70.
Reichenberg A, et al. Advancing paternal age and autism. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(9):1026–32.
Anagnostou E, Taylor MJ. Review of neuroimaging in autism spectrum disorders: what have we learned and where we go from here. Molecular Autism. 2011;2(1):4.
Buizer-Voskamp JE, et al. Paternal age and psychiatric disorders: findings from a Dutch population registry. Schizophr Res. 2011;129(2-3):128–32.
Alter MD, et al. Autism and increased paternal age related changes in global levels of gene expression regulation. PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e16715.
Sipos A, et al. Paternal age and schizophrenia: a population based cohort study. BMJ. 2004;329(7474):1070.
Wu Y, et al. Advanced paternal age increases the risk of schizophrenia and obsessive–compulsive disorder in a Chinese Han population. Psychiatry Res. 2012;198(3):353–9.
Wang SH, et al. Advanced paternal age and early onset of schizophrenia in sporadic cases: not confounded by parental polygenic risk for schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2019;86(1):56–64.
Miller B, et al. Meta-analysis of paternal age and schizophrenia risk in male versus female offspring. Schizophr Bull. 2011;37(5):1039–47.
Lee, H., et al., Paternal age related schizophrenia (PARS): latent subgroups detected by k-means clustering analysis. Schizophr Res, 2011. 128(1-3):143-9.
Andreassen R, Lundsted J, Olaisen B. Mutation at minisatellite locus DYF155S1: allele length mutation rate is affected by age of progenitor. Electrophoresis. 2002;23(15):2377–83.
Singh NP, Muller CH, Berger RE. Effects of age on DNA double-strand breaks and apoptosis in human sperm. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(6):1420–30.
Frans EM, et al. Advancing paternal age and bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(9):1034–40.
Weiser M, et al. Understanding the association between advanced paternal age and schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Psychol Med. 2020;50(3):431–7.
Racine SE, et al. Advanced paternal age at birth: phenotypic and etiologic associations with eating pathology in offspring. Psychol Med. 2014;44(5):1029–41.
Saha S, et al. Advanced paternal age is associated with impaired neurocognitive outcomes during infancy and childhood. PLoS Med. 2009;6(3):e40.
Malaspina D, et al. Paternal age and intelligence: implications for age-related genomic changes in male germ cells. Psychiatr Genet. 2005;15(2):117–25.
Vestergaard M, et al. Paternal age and epilepsy in the offspring. Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20(12):1003–5.
Janecka M, et al. Effects of advanced paternal age on trajectories of social behavior in offspring. Genes Brain Behav. 2015;14(6):443–53.
Foldi CJ, et al. Increasing paternal age alters anxiety-related behaviour in adult mice. Genes Brain Behav. 2019;18(2):e12522.
Smith RG, et al. Advancing paternal age is associated with deficits in social and exploratory behaviors in the offspring: a mouse model. PLoS One. 2009;4(12):e8456.
Garcia-Palomares S, et al. Long-term effects of delayed fatherhood in mice on postnatal development and behavioral traits of offspring. Biol Reprod. 2009;80(2):337–42.
Rosenfield PJ, et al. Later paternal age and sex differences in schizophrenia symptoms. Schizophr Res. 2010;116(2-3):191–5.
Gale-Grant O, et al. Parental age effects on neonatal white matter development. Neuroimage Clin. 2020;27(2213-1582 (Electronic)):102283.
Nevalainen T, et al. Increased paternal age at conception is associated with transcriptomic changes involved in mitochondrial function in elderly individuals. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0167028.
Smith RG, et al. Transcriptomic changes in the frontal cortex associated with paternal age. Molecular autism. 2014;5(1):24.
Sampino S, et al. Grand-paternal age and the development of autism-like symptoms in mice progeny. Transl Psychiatry. 2014;4(4):e386.
Milekic MH, et al. Age-related sperm DNA methylation changes are transmitted to offspring and associated with abnormal behavior and dysregulated gene expression. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;20(8):995–1001.
Denomme MM, et al. The inherited methylome landscape is directly altered with paternal aging and associated with offspring neurodevelopmental disorders. Aging Cell. 2020;19(8).
Perrin M, et al. Critical periods and the developmental origins of disease: an epigenetic perspective of schizophrenia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1204 Suppl(s1):E8-13.
Chudal R, et al. Parental age and the risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a nationwide, population-based cohort study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015;54(6):487–94 e1.
Kollias C, et al. Evidence of advanced parental age linked to sporadic schizophrenia. Psychiatriki. 2019;30(1):24–31.
Kleinhaus K, et al. Catatonic schizophrenia: a cohort prospective study. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38(2):331–7.
Dreier JW, et al. Parental age and risk of epilepsy: a nationwide register-based study. Epilepsia. 2018;59(7):1334–43.
Idring S, et al. Parental age and the risk of autism spectrum disorders: findings from a Swedish population-based cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(1):107–15.
Maramara LA, He W, Ming X. Pre- and perinatal risk factors for autism spectrum disorder in a New Jersey cohort. J Child Neurol. 2014;29(12):1645–51.
Lampi KM, et al. Parental age and risk of autism spectrum disorders in a Finnish national birth cohort. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013;43(11):2526–35.
Myrskyla M, et al. Is later better or worse? Association of Advanced Parental age with Offspring Cognitive Ability among Half a million young Swedish men. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;177(7):649–55.
Fountoulakis KN, et al. Paternal and maternal age as risk factors for schizophrenia: a case-control study. Int J Psych Clin Pract. 2018;22(3):170–6.
Lopez-Castroman J, et al. Differences in maternal and paternal age between schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders. Schizophr Res. 2010;116(2-3):184–90.
Croen LA, et al. Maternal and paternal age and risk of autism spectrum disorders. Arch Pediat Adoles Med. 2007;161(4):334–40.
Merikangas AK, et al. Parental age and offspring psychopathology in the Philadelphia neurodevelopmental cohort. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56(5):391–400.
Berko ER, et al. Mosaic epigenetic dysregulation of ectodermal cells in autism spectrum disorder. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(5):e1004402.
Aoulad Fares D, et al. Preconception telomere length as a novel maternal biomarker to assess the risk of spina bifida in the offspring. Birth Defects Res. 2020;112(9):645–51.
Shaw P, et al. Parental age effects on cortical morphology in offspring. Cereb Cortex. 2012;22(6):1256–62.
Foldi CJ, et al. Advanced paternal age is associated with alterations in discrete behavioural domains and cortical neuroanatomy of C57BL/6J mice. Eur J Neurosci. 2010;31(3):556–64.
Sampino S, et al. Pregnancy at advanced maternal age affects behavior and hippocampal gene expression in mouse offspring. J Gerontol. 2017;72(11):1465–73.
Oury F, et al. Maternal and offspring pools of osteocalcin influence brain development and functions. Cell. 2013;155(1):228–41.
Sunwoo JS, et al. Maternal immune activation alters brain microRNA expression in mouse offspring. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018;5(10):1264–76.
Graham AM, et al. Maternal systemic interleukin-6 during pregnancy is associated with newborn amygdala phenotypes and subsequent behavior at 2 years of age. Biol Psych. 2018;83(2):109–19.
Rasmussen JM, et al. Maternal Interleukin-6 concentration during pregnancy is associated with variation in frontolimbic white matter and cognitive development in early life. Neuroimage. 2018;185:825–35.
Rudolph MD, et al. Maternal IL-6 during pregnancy can be estimated from newborn brain connectivity and predicts future working memory in offspring. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21(5):765–72.
Ramirez JSB, et al. Maternal interleukin-6 is associated with macaque offspring amygdala development and behavior. Cereb Cortex. 2020;30(3):1573–85.
Elovitz MA, et al. Intrauterine inflammation, insufficient to induce parturition, still evokes fetal and neonatal brain injury. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2011;29(6):663–71.
Wu Y, et al. Association of prenatal maternal psychological distress with fetal brain growth, metabolism, and cortical maturation. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(1):e1919940.
Yamasaki S, et al. Maternal diabetes in early pregnancy, and psychotic experiences and depressive symptoms in 10-year-old offspring: a population-based birth cohort study. Schizophr Res. 2019;206:52–7.
Urhoj SK, Mortensen LH, Nybo Andersen AM. Advanced paternal age and risk of musculoskeletal congenital anomalies in offspring. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2015;104(6):273–80.
Dakouane Giudicelli M, et al. Increased achondroplasia mutation frequency with advanced age and evidence for G1138A mosaicism in human testis biopsies. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(6):1651–6.
Wiener-Megnazi Z, Auslender R, Dirnfeld M. Advanced paternal age and reproductive outcome. Asian J Androl. 2012;14(1):69–76.
Wyrobek AJ, et al. Advancing age has differential effects on DNA damage, chromatin integrity, gene mutations, and aneuploidies in sperm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(25):9601–6.
Choi SK, et al. A germ-line-selective advantage rather than an increased mutation rate can explain some unexpectedly common human disease mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(29):10143–8.
Goriely A, et al. Gain-of-function amino acid substitutions drive positive selection of FGFR2 mutations in human spermatogonia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(17):6051–6.
Montgomery SM, et al. Parental age, family size, and risk of multiple sclerosis. Epidemiology. 2004;15(6):717–23.
Murray L, et al. Association of early life factors and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in childhood: historical cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2002;86(3):356–61.
Petridou ET, et al. Advanced parental age as risk factor for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from studies of the childhood leukemia international consortium. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(10):965–76.
Yip BH, Pawitan Y, Czene K. Parental age and risk of childhood cancers: a population-based cohort study from Sweden. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(6):1495–503.
Choi JY, et al. Association of paternal age at birth and the risk of breast cancer in offspring: a case control study. BMC Cancer. 2005;5:143.
Toriello HV, et al. Statement on guidance for genetic counseling in advanced paternal age. Genet Med. 2008;10(6):457–60.
Urhoj SK, et al. Advanced paternal age and mortality of offspring under 5 years of age: a register-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(2):343–50.
Fieder M, Huber S. Paternal age predicts offspring chances of marriage and reproduction. Am J Hum Biol. 2015;27(3):339–43.
Caballero-Campo P, et al. Advanced paternal age affects sperm count and anogenital distance in mouse offspring. Reprod Sci. 2018;25(4):515–22.
Whincup PH, Cook DG, Shaper AG. Early influences on blood pressure: a study of children aged 5-7 years. BMJ. 1989;299(6699):587–91.
Gillman MW, et al. Maternal age and other predictors of newborn blood pressure. J Pediatr. 2004;144(2):240–5.
Wijnands KP, et al. Periconceptional parental conditions and perimembranous ventricular septal defects in the offspring. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2014;100(12):944–50.
Yu Y, et al. Maternal diabetes during pregnancy and early onset of cardiovascular disease in offspring: population based cohort study with 40 years of follow-up. BMJ. 2019:367(1756-1833 (Electronic)):l6398.
Nyasordzi J, et al. Early life factors and their relevance to intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery in early adulthood. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0233227.
Lu HY, et al. Association between maternal age at delivery and allergic rhinitis in schoolchildren: a population-based study. World Allergy Org J. 2020;13(6):100127.
Saremi L, et al. Parental age-related risk of retinoblastoma in Iranian children. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(6):2847–50.
Fisch H, et al. Maternal age as a risk factor for hypospadias. J Urol. 2001;165(3):934–6.
Porter MP, et al. Hypospadias in Washington state: maternal risk factors and prevalence trends. Pediatrics. 2005;115(4):e495–9.
Tarin JJ, et al. Delayed motherhood increases the probability of sons to be infertile. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001;18(12):650–4.
Basso O, et al. Maternal age at birth and daughters' subsequent childlessness. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(2):311–9.
Kaytor MD, et al. Increased trinucleotide repeat instability with advanced maternal age. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6(12):2135–9.
Moore AM, et al. Persistent epigenetic changes in adult daughters of older mothers. Epigenetics. 2019;14(5):467–76.
Del Carmen Nogales M, et al. Type of chromosome abnormality affects embryo morphology dynamics. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(1):229–235 e2.
Jennings MO, et al. Management and counseling of the male with advanced paternal age. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(2):324–8.
Bartolacci A, et al. Abnormal sperm concentration and motility as well as advanced paternal age compromise early embryonic development but not pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective study of 1266 ICSI cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(10):1897–903.
Bellver J, et al. Influence of paternal age on assisted reproduction outcome. Reprod BioMed Online. 2008;17(5):595–604.
Frattarelli JL, et al. Male age negatively impacts embryo development and reproductive outcome in donor oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(1):97–103.
Dain L, Auslander R, Dirnfeld M. The effect of paternal age on assisted reproduction outcome. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):1–8.
Lopez G, et al. Diagnostic value of sperm DNA fragmentation and sperm high-magnification for predicting outcome of assisted reproduction treatment. Asian J Androl. 2013;15(6):790–4.
Zollner U, Dietl J. Perinatal risks after IVF and ICSI. J Perinat Med. 2013;41(1):17–22.
Sauer MV. Reproduction at an advanced maternal age and maternal health. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(5):1136–43.
Reindollar RH, et al. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate optimal treatment for unexplained infertility: the fast track and standard treatment (FASTT) trial. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(3):888–99.
Klipstein S, et al. One last chance for pregnancy: a review of 2,705 in vitro fertilization cycles initiated in women age 40 years and above. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(2):435–45.
Moaddab A, et al. Effect of advanced maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;216:178–83.
Wennberg AL, et al. Effect of maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(5):1142–1149 e14.
Brandt JS, et al. Advanced paternal age, infertility, and reproductive risks: a review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39(2):81–7.
Janecka M, et al. Advanced paternal age effects in neurodevelopmental disorders-review of potential underlying mechanisms. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7(1):e1019.
Availability of data and material
The data and material in this article are available.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Funding
This work was supported by National Science Foundation of China (nos.81730038) and CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2019-I2M-5-001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.Q. and L.Y. conceived the project. J.Q., L.Y. and C.Z. wrote the manuscript with help from all of the authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest/competing interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest and competing interests.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, C., Yan, L. & Qiao, J. Effect of advanced parental age on pregnancy outcome and offspring health. J Assist Reprod Genet 39, 1969–1986 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02533-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02533-w