Introduction

In marine aquaculture, microalgae are used as feed for larvae and benthic stages of filter feeders (Tremblay et al. 2007; Fernández-Reiriz et al. 2015) as well as for pelagic live feed organisms such as copepods, rotifers, and brine shrimp (McKinnon et al. 2003; Srivastava et al. 2006; Seixas et al. 2009). The microalgal cryptophyte Rhodomonas improves the survival, growth, lipid content, and reproduction of brine shrimp, copepods, and scallop larvae (McKinnon et al. 2003; Knuckey et al. 2005; Tremblay et al. 2007; Seixas et al. 2009; Ohs et al. 2010; Zhang et al. 2013), and contain the essential polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5ω3), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6ω3), and arachidonic acid (ARA, 20:4ω6) in ratios optimal for aquaculture organisms (Guevara et al. 2016; Vu et al. 2016; Jakobsen et al. 2018). These PUFAs are essential for the survival and development of fish larvae (Bell and Sargent 2003; Sargent et al. 1997; Sargent et al. 1999) and are transferred to the fish larvae through the live feed.

The existing literature on Rhodomonas primarily discuss the nutritional value of the microalga as a diet for live feed organisms in aquaculture based on its biochemical composition with the majority focusing on copepods (e.g., Støttrup et al. 1999; McKinnon et al. 2003; Knuckey et al. 2005; Drillet et al. 2006; Seixas et al. 2009; Ohs et al. 2010; de Lima et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2013, Arndt and Summer 2014; Jakobsen et al. 2018). The biochemical composition of Rhodomonas has also been studied at different temperatures (Renaud et al. 2002), irradiances, and nutrient levels (Guevara et al. 2016; Vu et al. 2016), at different growth phases (Boelen et al. 2017), and when cultivated in various growth media (Valenzuela-Espinoza et al. 2005; Huerlimann et al. 2010). In addition, the content of the pigment phycoerythrin has been studied at different temperatures (Chaloub et al. 2015), irradiances (Bartual et al. 2002; Chaloub et al. 2015; Vu et al. 2016), and nutrient levels (Eriksen and Iversen 1995; Chaloub et al. 2015; Vu et al. 2016). A recent small-scale study by Jepsen et al. (2018) evaluated the effect of salinity and different commercial salts on Rhodomonas salina and the copepod Acartia tonsa with positive outcomes for large-scale cultivation located without access to seawater. Aside from Jepsen et al. (2018), studies specifically regarding a meso- or large-scale production of R. salina, or optimization hereof, are not found in the literature. The aim was therefore to study factors acting as barriers for large-scale production of Rhodomonas as a microalgal diet for live feed organisms in aquaculture. This motivated us to focus on (1) the necessity of CoCl2 (cobalt(II) chloride) in the f/2 growth medium, (2) the content of PUFAs in five strains of Rhodomonas to identify the most suitable strain, (3) the temporal sedimentation of the five strains of Rhodomonas to identify the one with the lowest sedimentation rate which could potentially reduce biofouling of the PBR, (4) the effect on growth rate by adding nitrogen as different sources to the growth medium, (5) the effect of different types of seawater treatment on the growth rate, and finally (6) the growth rate of different initial inoculum densities.

Large-scale cultivation of microalgae in PBRs is extremely time and labor consuming to conduct and therefore small-scale experiments were conducted to study the various factors and obtain useful results within a short period. It can be problematic to transfer certain results from small- to large-scale systems as there is a dimensional factor hindering an exact scale-up. Nonetheless, factors such as nutrient requirement, commercial salts, and treatment of seawater are restricted to the organism and results regarding these factors can therefore be transferred directly from small to large scale. Contrary, the specific growth rate of initial cell densities will most likely be affected between scales but it still provides a guidance to estimate the size and density of the inoculum for a desired production. In the following sections, each studied factor is introduced to clarify why these factors are important to study when pursuing an ambition of optimizing the large-scale production of Rhodomonas.

Successful meso- and large-scale cultivation of R. salina in tubular and vertical PBRs has taken place the last 4 years at Roskilde University and its project partners. One of the limiting factors for cultivation is the need for cleaning of the PBR at a regular frequency due to biofouling. During cleaning, the PBR is shut down which is an economic loss for the production. The period for cultivation could potentially be prolonged by substituting with a Rhodomonas strain with a lower rate of cell sedimentation (i.e., high motility) and thereby reduce the tendency of biofouling. Furthermore, since closely related species and strains of a given microalga are known to have deviating biochemical compositions, it is important to compare the PUFA content between strains of Rhodomonas to identify the most suitable strain as a microalgal diet for the aquaculture (Lang et al. 2011; Guevara et al. 2016).

The cultivation of microalgae necessitates growth media, and numerous recipes are available and generally target a broad range of species (Harrison et al. 1980; Keller et al. 1987). The growth medium is therefore likely to contain unnecessary or excessive amounts of certain components for cultivation of specific species. To our knowledge, there is no growth medium specifically defined according to the nutrient requirements for Rhodomonas. The nitrogen source can be added as ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3), or urea and the preferred source is species-specific (e.g., Giordano 1997; Lourenço et al. 2002). The increased growth rate of some microalgal species obtained when cultivated on NH4+ (Giordano 1997) is assumed to be coupled to the lower demand of reductants for assimilation (Dortch 1990). Growth media also contain different trace metals but the requirement of various trace metals is species-specific and some microalgal species can substitute a given trace metal with another (e.g., Timmermans et al. 2001; Xu et al. 2007). The compound CoCl2 in growth media is problematic for a large-scale production as it is widely recognized as a toxic substance. Exposure limits, as well as limits for tolerated daily intake (TDI), have been established by both the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) in the European Union as well as by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in the United States of America. In particular, the European Union guidelines involve producing elaborated and detailed documentation for the use of CoCl2. Producing this necessary documentation is both manpower requiring and time consuming and since some microalgal species are able to substitute cobalt (Co) with another trace metal, or simply does not require Co, it is relevant to study if CoCl2 can be excluded from the large-scale production of Rhodomonas with no consequences for the yield.

During cultivation of microalgae, it is essential that unwanted organisms are not introduced to the culture. The treatments applied to eliminate unwanted organisms at small-scale (≤ 20 L) are filtration and autoclaving (e.g., Lourenço et al. 2002; Knuckey et al. 2005; de Lima et al. 2013; Arndt and Sommer 2014; Vu et al. 2016) while larger volumes generally are treated by filtration and UV radiation (e.g., Summerfelt 2003; Bamba et al. 2014). Common for these types of treatments is no addition of chemicals or production of toxic residues that may negatively affect the microalgae (Rhodes et al. 2008). However, filtration does not sterilize as small bacteria and certainly viruses can pass through depending on the pore size of the filter material. Autoclaving is an effective sterilization method although it can raise pH of seawater and cause precipitation of nutrients (Jones 1967; Filip and Middlebrooks 1975). This, however, can easily be overcome by controlling pH during cultivation and adding sterilized nutrients post autoclaving. Nevertheless, autoclavation is unrealistic in large-scale productions and UV radiation is widely used in, e.g., the aquaculture, where pre-filtration is crucial for optimal effectiveness (Summerfelt 2003). The small-scale experiments in the present study use autoclaved seawater to define the optimal cultivation conditions of Rhodomonas and a comparison of the seawater treatments used at the different scales is therefore necessary for detecting possible effects of a given treatment of the seawater used for cultivation of Rhodomonas.

The size and density of inocula used to initiate microalgae cultures are important, especially for a large-scale production. A common rule of thumb is that the inoculum for a new culture should be minimum 10% (v/v) of the original culture. However, there are, to our knowledge, no studies explaining or confirming the validity of this rule, and it most likely depends on the species and the purpose of the cultivation. Contrary, the cell density of a culture affects the growth rate as, e.g., self-shading may reduce growth at higher densities. For a large-scale cultivation, it is relevant to study the growth rate of inocula at various initial cell densities to estimate when a given biomass for production is reached. Furthermore, it is time consuming to maintain a large volume of inocula cultures for a large-scale production and this can be reduced by merely maintaining the specific volume of inoculum necessary for the production.

Materials and methods

Algal strains and general culture conditions

Five species/strains of Rhodomonas were obtained from culture collections and are referred to their respective strain identity (Table 1). The strains were cultivated in natural seawater (NSW) with a salinity of 30–35 collected from > 30 m depth in the Kattegat (DK) and filtered through a series of filters (terminal pore size of 0.2 μm). Equipment, NSW, and growth medium stock solutions were autoclaved (15 min at 125 °C) prior to use. Irradiance was continuous (24:0 light/dark cycle) and measured with a Hansatech Instruments LTD Quantitherm light meter QRT1 (see below for specific irradiance in the separate experiments). The f/2 growth medium (without addition of silicate) was used for cultivation (Guillard and Ryther 1962; Guillard 1975), except in experiment 5 “Seawater treatment.” Cell concentration was enumerated on a Coulter Counter (Beckman) using the computer program Multisizer 3, except experiment 4 “Nitrogen source” and experiment 6 “Initial density” (see the respective experimental sections below). Growth rates were calculated by fit of exponential growth functions on either cell concentration or optical density (OD) over time.

Table 1 The studied strains of Rhodomonas obtained from various culture collections

Experiment 1: CoCl2

Strain K-1487 was cultivated in two versions of f/2 growth medium: a regular version and a version without addition of CoCl2 (this strain is referred to as K-1487*). Cultivation took place in a small-scale PBR (Multi-Cultivator MC1000, Photon System Instruments, Czech Republic) with eight test tubes (each 85 mL) and aeration at 20 °C and irradiance of 85 μmol photons m−2 s−1 (n = 4). The experimental period was 5 days with a start concentration of 64,460 ± 3234 cells mL−1. Samples for fatty acids were taken on day 6 and analyzed as described in “Experiment 2: Fatty acids” section. Nutrients were added daily.

Experiment 2: fatty acids

Samples for comparing the fatty acid composition between the Rhodomonas strains were taken from exponentially growing semi-batch cultures in 1 L round-bottom flasks with aeration at 17 °C and irradiance of approximately 13 μmol photons m−2 s−1 (n = 3). The low irradiance was chosen to maintain reduced, but still exponential, growth rates in these cultures. The cells were filtered onto 0.2 μm glass microfiber filters (Whatman GF/C) and stored at − 80 °C until analyzed according to Drillet et al. (2006) with minor adjustments: addition of 20 μL internal standard (C23-methylester, 1000 μg mL−1) and no sonication.

Experiment 3: temporal sedimentation

Each Rhodomonas strain was transferred to individual 250 mL beakers (n = 5) at a cell concentration of 418,423 ± 28,400 cells mL−1, except CCAP 995/5 at 99,500 ± 3536 cells mL−1. Replicates were left undisturbed at room temperature in the stagnant water and samples for cell enumeration were withdrawn 1 cm below the water surface after intervals of 1 and 6 h.

Experiment 4: nitrogen source

The nitrogen source in the f/2 growth medium was changed from NO3 (nitrate) to NH4+ (ammonium) and CO(NH2)2 (urea), and combinations of these with an equimolar amount of N in all treatments (Table 2). Cultivation of strain K-1487* took place in the small-scale PBR (described in “Experiment 1: CoCl2” section) at 20 °C and irradiance of 100 μmol photons m−2 s−1 (n = 4). Start concentration was 141,500 ± 18,742 cells mL−1 and determined by a build-in OD measuring device measuring automatically every 30 min for 30 h. An equation between cell concentration (Coulter Counter - Beckman) and absorbance (Spectrophotometer - Genesys 6, Thermo Scientific) was obtained by linear regression to estimate the cell concentration by OD:

$$ Cell\ concentration\ \left({mL}^{-1}\right)=\left(\frac{abs_{550\ nm}-0.0026}{0.0002}\right)\ast 100 $$
(1)

where abs550 nm is the absorbance of the sample at 550 nm.

Table 2 The concentration (g L−1) of the specific nitrogen sources in the modified f/2 stock solutions and the volume (mL L−1) of each stock solution added to 1 L seawater for cultivation of K-1487. All N-sources had an equimolar amount of N

Experiment 5: seawater treatment

Strain K-1487 was cultivated in filtered (0.2 μm) NSW exposed to autoclavation or UV radiation. For comparison, the growth rate of K-1487 in filtered NSW without further treatment was included. Cultivation took place in aerated 2 L round-bottom flasks with B1 growth medium added at experimental start and irradiance of 67 ± 7 μmol photons m−2 s−1 at 20 °C (n = 4). The experimental period was 4 days with a start concentration of 169,500 ± 2500 cells mL−1. Cell concentrations were determined by OD as described in “Experiment 4: Nitrogen source” section.

Experiment 6: initial density

Strain K-1487 was inoculated at increasing initial densities from 2000 to 200,000 cells mL−1 in aerated 1 L round-bottom flasks at 18.5 ± 0.7 °C and irradiance of 103 μmol photons m−2 s−1 (n = 3). The specific initial densities were 2000 ± 0, 7000 ± 0, 9500 ± 4183, 43,667 ± 2582, 104,500 ± 7583 and 196,167 ± 4916 cells mL−1. Nutrients were added at experimental start. Cell concentration during the exponential growth phase was determined daily by OD as described in “Experiment 4: Nitrogen source” section. The cell concentration (N) over time was plotted as ln(N/N0) where N0 is the cell concentration at the experimental start. Data were fitted to the modified Gompertz equation described in Zwietering et al. (1990):

$$ y= Aexp\left(-\mathit{\exp}\left(\frac{\mu_me}{A}\left(\uplambda -t\right)+1\right)\right) $$
(2)

The maximum specific growth rate (μm) and lag time (λ) can be calculated from the parameters (a, b, c) obtained from the fit:

$$ {\mu}_m=\frac{a\ast c}{e} $$
(3)
$$ \uplambda =\frac{b-1}{c} $$
(4)

Statistical analysis

Data on the cell content of fatty acids, growth rate on nitrogen sources, different seawater treatments, and of different initial cell densities were subjected to one-way ANOVAs. Significant results were followed by a Holm-Sidak post hoc test to compare individual means across significantly different levels.

Data on temporal sedimentation was recorded as percentage of cells remaining in the upper 1 cm of the water column after 1 and 6 h and logit-transformed (Sokal and Rohlf 1995) prior to analysis with one-way ANOVA followed by a Holm-Sidak post hoc test to compare individual means across significantly different levels.

Data on the growth rate in f/2 growth medium with and without CoCl2 was subjected to a two-tailed t test.

Prior to ANOVAs and t tests, data were tested for constant variance (Spearman’s rank correlation) and normality (Shapiro-Wilk test). All tests were carried out using SigmaPlot 12.0 (Systat Software) with α = 0.05.

Results

CoCl2

The growth rate of strain K-1487 in the two treatments (with and without CoCl2 added to the f/2 growth medium) was not statistically significant at an average of 0.69 ± 0.04 day−1 (p = 0.765) (Fig. 1). Likewise, the cell content of the PUFAs DHA, EPA, and ARA was not statistically significant different between the two treatments with averages of 2.6 ± 0.1, 3.9 ± 0.4, and 0.2 ± 0.1 pg cell−1, respectively (one-way ANOVA, p ≤ 0.453).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The growth rate (day−1, striped bars) and cell content (pg) of the PUFAs DHA (black bars), EPA (light gray bars), and ARA (dark gray bars) of K-1487 cultivated with and without CoCl2 added to the f/2 growth medium. Mean values ± S.D. (n = 4)

Fatty acids

The cell content of the PUFAs DHA, EPA, and ARA was compared in the five strains of Rhodomonas (Fig. 2). The content of EPA and ARA was not statistically different between strains ranging from 1.9 ± 0.3 to 3.1 ± 0.1 pg EPA cell−1 and 0.07 ± 0.05 to 0.22 ± 0.05 pg ARA cell−1 (one-way ANOVA, EPA; p = 0.267 ARA; p = 0.156). However, ARA was either not present or below detection limit in CCAP 995/5. The content of DHA was statistically significant higher in CCAP 995/5 with 4.0 ± 0.1 pg cell−1 (one-way ANOVA, p ≤ 0.018). The cell content of EPA was higher than DHA in all strains, except CCAP 995/5 where the opposite was observed.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The cell content (pg) of DHA (black bars), EPA (light gray bars), and ARA (dark gray bars) in the Rhodomonas strains. Symbol (#) indicates a statistical difference. ARA was not present or below detection limit in CCAP 995/5. Mean values ± S.D. (n = 3)

The highest ratios of DHA/EPA were 1.3 and 1.0 for CCAP 995/5 and K-1487*, respectively (Table 3). The remaining strains had similar DHA/EPA ratios of 0.7 and 0.8. For EPA/ARA, the highest ratios were 5.1 and 4.4 for K-1487 and K-0435, respectively.

Table 3 The cell content of DHA, EPA and ARA in the Rhodomonas strains expressed as % of TFA, and the ratios of DHA/EPA and EPA/ARA. ARA was not present or below detection limit in CCAP 995/5. Mean values ± S.D. (n = 3)

Temporal sedimentation

The cell sedimentation of the Rhodomonas strains was measured after 1 and 6 h to identify the strain with the lowest sedimentation. The cell density (%) in the upper 1 cm water column of undisturbed seawater was significantly different between the Rhodomonas strains at the given time intervals (Fig. 3). After 1 h, the cell density of K-1487, K-1487*, and K-0435 was statistically highest with > 80% of the cells remaining in the water column. After 6 h, the cell density was still highest for K-1487 and K-1487* with 54 ± 2 and 63 ± 3%, respectively (one-way ANOVA, 1 h; p < 0.001, 6 h; p < 0.001). Merely the two significantly highest groups (A, a and B, b) at each given time interval are considered here.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The cell density (%) of the Rhodomonas strains in the upper 1 cm water column after 1 (black bars) and 6 h (white bars) in undisturbed water. Letters A and B indicate the two statistically significant groups at each given time interval with the highest percentage of cells remaining (1 h, uppercase; 6 h, lowercase). Statistically significant differences at lower densities are not indicated. Mean values ± S.D. (n = 5)

Nitrogen source

The effect of the nitrogen source on the growth rate of strain K-1487* was studied by adding NO3, NH4+, urea, or combinations of these (Fig. 4). Cultivation with NH4+ as the nitrogen source yielded a significantly higher growth rate of 1.3 ± 0.07 day−1 compared to the growth rate for NO3 of 1.0 ± 0.08 day−1 (one-way ANOVA, p = 0.046). Contrary, urea and combinations of the nitrogen sources gave no statistically significant difference in growth rate compared to both NO3 and NH4+.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The growth rate (day−1) of K-1487* cultivated with the nitrogen sources NO3−, NH4+, urea, and combinations of these (1:1). Letters (A, B) indicate statistically significant groups. Mean values ± S.D. (n = 4)

Seawater treatment

The growth rate of K-1487 cultivated in NSW treated with (1) filtration (0.2 μm) + autoclaving, (2) filtration (0.2 μm) + UV radiation, and (3) filtration (0.2 μm) was compared. The results show that there were no significant differences on growth rates in the treatments with an average of 0.7 ± 0.1 day−1 (one-way ANOVA, p = 0.833). However, cultivation in simply filtered NSW became contaminated after ~ 1 week of cultivation with an unidentified nanoflagellate (personal observations) limiting the period of cultivation.

Initial density

The temporal cell concentration of initial densities of K-1487* in the range of 2000 to 200,000 cells mL−1 was fitted to the modified Gompertz equation (Zwietering et al. 1990) to calculate the exponential growth rate (Figs. 5 and 6). The initial density of 2000 and 7000 cells mL−1 obtained the highest growth rates at 1.4 day−1. A trend was observed with the growth rate gradually decreasing with increasing initial density to 0.7 day−1 at 200,000 cells mL−1. The lag time was calculated to be shorter than the sampling interval for cell enumeration and was therefore not considered further.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The temporal cell concentration (ln(N/N0)) of different initial densities (cells mL−1) of K-1487* fitted to the modified Gompertz equation. Mean values ± S.D. (n = 3)

Fig. 6
figure 6

The growth rates (day−1, ●) of different initial densities of K-1487* calculated with parameters from the fit to the modified Gompertz equation

The time required for the initial densities to reach a biomass of 106 cells mL−1 successively decreased with increasing initial density; 6.8 days for 2000 cells mL−1 and 2.8 days for 200,000 cells mL−1 (Table 4). However, initial densities of 40,000 and 100,000 cells mL−1 both reached 106 cells mL−1 after just 3.8 days.

Table 4 The time (day) for the different initial densities of K-1487* to reach a density of 106 cells mL−1

Discussion

The findings in this study represent a step toward a broader implementation of Rhodomonas as a microalgal diet for live feed organisms in aquaculture as relevant practicalities for large-scale production are sought clarified.

Various growth media recipes are available but, e.g., the specific trace metal requirement of phytoplankton varies and it depends on the species if a specific trace metal can be substituted with another trace metal. Examples on Co from the literature showing this species specificity are the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi substitute Co and Zn (zinc) with each other (Xu et al. 2007), the diatoms Thalassiosira pseudonana and T. ocenica largely substitute Zn with Co (Sunda and Huntsman 1995; Yee and Morel 1996), the prymnesiophyte Phaeocystis antarctica substitute Zn with Co although Zn is preferred (Saito and Goepfert 2008), the diatom Chaetoceros calcitrans lack a substitution of Zn with Co (Timmermans et al. 2001), and the cyanobacteria Synechococcus bacillaris and Prochlorococcus require Co for growth (Sunda and Huntsman 1995; Saito et al. 2002). Studies on the trace metal requirements of Rhodomonas are lacking and our study did not seek to clarify the requirement of all the trace metals in the f/2 growth medium. Nevertheless, it is a key finding for a large-scale production of Rhodomonas that exclusion of CoCl2 from the growth medium does not affect neither the growth rate nor the cell content of DHA, EPA, and ARA as these parameters are essential for aquaculture. Large quantities of growth medium are prepared during a large-scale production of microalgae and exclusion of CoCl2 will ease production by bypassing the required elaborated and detailed documentation required by, e.g., ECHA and NIOSH. However, it must be highlighted that NSW contain small amounts of Co (0.00005 μm kg−1 according to Atkinson and Bingman 1997). Thus, either strain K-1487* can substitute Co with another trace metal, or there is an adequate amount of Co present in NSW.

A further modification of the f/2 growth medium was the addition of various nitrogen sources. The highest growth rate of strain K-1487* was obtained with NH4+ as the nitrogen source and similar to the results reported by Lewitus and Caron (1990) for Pyrenomonas (now Rhodomonas) salina with a growth rate at 1.2 day−1 (135 μmol, 21 °C). However, Lourenço et al. (1997) reported that the cryptophyte Hillea sp. could not grow on NH4+ unless reduced to a concentration equal to half of that used in the present study. The lower demand of reductants for assimilation of NH4+ is a plausible explanation for the increase in growth rate observed in the present experiment (Dortch 1990). However, studies have shown that the biochemical content of microalgae may be altered when supplied with different nitrogen sources and future studies must clarify if NH4+ alters the biochemical profile (in particular the PUFAs) of Rhodomonas (Fidalgo et al. 1998; Lourenço et al. 2002). Providing the nitrogen source in the form of NH4+ may cause an acidification of the culture as NH4+ is taken up by the microalgae in the form of NH3, leaving a proton in the medium. However, when the cell concentration of microalgae increases during cultivation, the photosynthetic activity raises pH. In this experiment, pH was not controlled or adjusted but the effect of acidification is assumed to be minor, as seawater is generally well buffered due to its high content of carbonates (Goldman et al. 1982), and the cells in our experiment grew exponentially during the experimental period indicating no negative effect of pH. It must be stressed that the positive effect on growth rate of providing NH4+ as the nitrogen source obviously is larger than any negative effects of growth medium acidification on growth rate. In many plant and algal growth media (but not in the f/2 growth medium), the nitrogen source is provided as both NH4+ and NO3 because the acidifying effect of NH4+ uptake counters the alkalizing effect of NO3 uptake (Asher and Edwards 1983). In the present study, however, providing NH4+ as the only nitrogen source evidently gave the highest growth rate despite any effects of NH4+-uptake on pH or of pH on the NH3/NH4+ equilibrium. When producing microalgae at large scale, pH is usually controlled in a feedback system by CO2 addition as pH in the photobioreactor will increase during microalgal growth due to the photosynthetic uptake of CO2 and HCO3.

The microalgal diet has been shown to affect the composition of fatty acids in copepods (Støttrup et al. 1999; Caramujo et al. 2008; de Lima et al. 2013) and particularly Rhodomonas is praised as an excellent diet for the copepod Acartia by improving the nauplii survival, development rate, and reproduction (Knuckey et al. 2005; Zhang et al. 2013; Arndt and Sommer 2014). While a DHA/EPA/ARA ratio of 10:5:1 is considered optimal for some marine fish larvae (Sargent et al. 1999), studies on the specific nutritional requirement of PUFAs in copepods are limited (see references in Camus and Zeng 2010), and some species, e.g., Pseudodiaptomus annandalei, Tisbe furcata, and Nitokra lacustris, may de novo synthesize certain fatty acids (Parrish et al. 2012; Raynar et al. 2015). A short-term study (96 h) by Jakobsen et al. (2018) indicates that ARA is less important for Acartia tonsa (Dana) as similar reproductive rates were obtained on a diet of R. salina (K-1487) compared to a diet of the heterotrophic dinoflagellate Crypthecodinium cohnii with cell contents of ARA at 0.19 and 0.01% TFA, respectively. However, it is most likely not the case in long-term growth studies with the copepod. All of our studied Rhodomonas strains, except CCAP 995/5, are suitable as a microalgal diet for A. tonsa but to supply fish larvae with the essential ARA through the live feed (i.e., A. tonsa) a Rhodomonas strain with high ARA content must be offered as the microalgal diet. This excludes strain CCAP 995/5 unless ARA is supplied from another source. However, this would include another factor in the production line which is undesirable. The cell content of PUFAs in the strains in the present study can likely be increased and result in an improved nutritional value of Rhodomonas as a microalgal diet for live feed organisms as studies have reported an effect on the content of PUFAs in Rhodomonas when changing the temperature, light intensity, and nutrient level (Renaud et al. 2002; Guevara et al. 2016; Vu et al. 2016).

The strains exhibited different temporal sedimentation and strains K-1487 and K-1487* were identified as most suitable for cultivation in PBRs due to a low sedimentation. However, this study did not find an explanation for the low sedimentation in these two strains compared to the other strains. Data analysis on cell length (data not presented), total fatty acid content (data not presented), and bio volume (data not presented) showed no correlation with temporal sedimentation. The cultivation of a strain with a low sedimentation is expected to reduce the inevitable biofouling and necessary cleaning frequency of large-scale PBRs resulting in an increase of production.

The seawater for large-scale cultivation of microalgae used as a diet for live feed organisms in aquaculture requires a treatment without addition of chemicals and antibiotics as some organisms may otherwise be negatively affected (Rhodes et al. 2008). Large volumes of water in PBRs should be provided easy, cheap, and effective to meet all practical requirements. Furthermore, the end-product of the food chain, the fish, is intended for human consumption and must live up to high production standards. Studies comparing the growth rate of microalgae in seawater treated by autoclaving, filtration, and UV radiation are few. In the present study, the growth rate of Rhodomonas was not affected by any of these treatments. This indicates that our results obtained from small-scale experiments with Rhodomonas (using autoclaved seawater) can be directly implemented to a large-scale production (typically using UV-radiated seawater). Contrary to our results, Jorquera et al. (2002) obtained a lower growth rate of the prymnesiophyte Isochrysis galbana in UV-radiated seawater compared to autoclaved seawater which may be due to differences in the sensitivity of microalgal species to the toxic residues that can be produced during UV radiation. It is therefore optimal to combine filtration with UV radiation as filtration improves the efficiency of UV by removing particles shading the radiation (Liltved and Cripps 1999). Other examples from the literature on treatments used in aquaculture include, e.g., electrolytic treatment (Jorquera et al. 2002) and ozone (Summerfelt 2003).

To start the cultivation of microalgae in a PBR, an inoculum of a given volume and density is required to obtain the desired production within a given time frame. The initial density was shown to negatively affect the growth rate of strain K-1487* with increasing density. The growth rate was measured during the exponential phase; thus, limitation of nutrients is unlikely the cause for the observed decreased growth rate with increasing initial density. Also, a density of 200,000 cells mL−1 is by far a dense Rhodomonas culture and improbable to cause significant self-shading.

Generally, it is required to reach a desired cell density as fast as possible to produce sufficient microalgal feed for the live feed organisms. An example based on the present findings; a cell density of 106 cells mL−1 is desired after approximately 3 days in a 500-L PBR. The PBR must then be inoculated with an inoculum of 200 L with a density of 500,000 cells mL−1 which will result in an initial density of 200,000 cell mL−1 in the PBR. Contrary, if the PBR is inoculated with 10 L of the same inoculum as above, the initial density in PBR is 10,000 cells mL−1 and the desired cell density is not reached until approximately 5 days after inoculation. Thus, the production efficiency must be adjusted depending on the facility’s capacity for maintaining inoculum cultures of a given volume and the time allowed before cultivation at a desired cell density is reached. Knowledge on these parameters is valuable tools when planning a large-scale production of any given microalgae.

Recommendations

All of the studied strains of Rhodomonas are suitable for use in aquaculture when considering their content of PUFAs, except CCAP 995/5 which did not contain a traceable amount of ARA. However, we recommend the strain K-1487 for a large-scale production in PBRs due to its low sedimentation which potentially could decrease excessive biofouling of the PBR system. We also recommend that the f/2 growth medium is optimized by modifying the components according to the nutritional demand of K-1487. Our results clearly show that CoCl2 can be excluded without affecting the growth rate and content of PUFAs, and that the nitrogen source can be added as NH4+ in order to increase the growth rate. However, future studies must clarify if the cell content of PUFAs is altered compared to when adding the nitrogen source as NO3. The water should be UV-radiated to avoid contamination and prolong the period of cultivation. A time-consuming step in large-scale production is the maintenance of inoculum. Our results on growth rates for different initial densities of the inoculum are a guideline and should be measured for the specific PBR system used for cultivation. By adjusting the volume and density of the inoculum, the labor cost used for maintenance hereof can be minimized. With the present findings, several barriers for effective cultivation are solved and future large-scale production has become a great step closer.