1 Introduction

Energy crisis and global warming have raised worldwide interest in developing environment-friendly energy sources [1,2,3]. Alternatives to fossil fuels are significant to help reduce green-house effect and air pollution [3, 4]. Hydrogen, which is recognized as a clean and renewable energy source, possesses great potential to become the next generation energy source [2, 3]. Hydrogen production through methane or coal in industry involves enormous carbon dioxide emission [5]. While mass production of hydrogen by electrolysis with high efficiency remains laborious due to the sluggish kinetics of oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in water splitting [5, 6]. Superb catalyst which can promote the oxygen evolution is crucial to the production of hydrogen through water splitting. The state-of-art catalysts RuO2 and IrO2 suffer from high cost and low abundance [7]. Catalyst fabricated with earth-abundant elements is therefore needed to surmount the reaction obstacles and increase the efficiency.

Recent years have seen huge efforts focused on the synthesis of transition metal-based materials [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15], such as transition metal oxides and transition metal (oxy)hydroxides (CoOOH [16], NiCoFe layered triple hydroxide [17], FeCoW oxyhydroxide [9]), transition metal phosphides (CoP [18], NiP [19]), metal–organic frameworks (NiCo bimetal–organic framework [20]) and composites (NiFe layered double hydroxide–graphene oxide [8]). Some OER catalysts derived from Co3O4 have been reported, such as Au@Co3O4 core–shell nanocrystals [21] and graphene–Co3O4 nanocomposite [22]. However, the synthesis of Au@Co3O4 core–shell nanocrystals involves noble metal, which is adverse to industry application. The synthesis method of graphene–Co3O4 nanocomposite is complicated and high temperature calcination is also required. In addition, binder such as Nafion is needed for the fabrication of electrodes using powdered catalysts [20, 23]. Therefore, the fabrication of free-standing electrode with highly-efficient OER catalysts that consist of earth-abundant elements is attractive and challenging.

There are two general approaches to the development of an effective catalyst: improving the intrinsic property of each site or increasing the amount of effective sites. Intrinsic property can be enhanced by tuning binding energies of reaction intermediates. Morphology design contributes to the number of effective active sites [15]. A recent study predicted the superior intrinsic catalytic performance of FeCoW oxyhydroxide by calculating the corresponding binding energies of the intermediates using density functional theory (DFT+U) [9]. Non-3d high-valency metals such as tungsten can modulate 3d metal oxides to provide optimized adsorption energies and electronic structure for highly efficient OER. Cobalt-based composites supported on carbon fiber substrate are shown to be highly-efficient electrochemical catalysts, which may result from high electric conductivity and synergistic effect between cobalt oxide/cobalt and carbon substrate [24, 25]. It is reported that PPy/carbon structure can increase the metal availability for electrode reaction [26]. Meanwhile, PPy and cobalt can form Co–N active sites with enhanced electrochemical property [27, 28]. Therefore, a highly-efficient OER catalytic electrode is expected through the fabrication of FeCoW catalyst supported by PPy/CFC substrate.

Herein, FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC free-standing electrode was synthesized through a simple electrodeposition method and showed efficient OER catalytic performance. The FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC electrodes achieved a higher current density (36.2 mA cm−2) than FeWCo3O4/CFC (30.7 mA cm−2) at an overpotential of 400 mV. The PPy was demonstrated to improve the contact between active material and substrate, which enables better OER electrocatalytic performance of FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC electrode than that of FeWCo3O4/CFC electrode.

2 Experimental section

Carbon fiber clothes (CFC) were firstly washed with deionized water (DI water) and acetone several times, then immersed into dilute nitric acid for 24 h to remove the surface impurities. Thereafter, the CFC were washed with DI water and dried at 60 °C in oven for 2 h before use.

2.1 PPy grown on CFC (PPy/CFC)

Pyrrole (1 mL) was firstly dissolved into DI water (50 mL). Then ammonium persulfate (1 g) and sodium p-toluenesulfonate (1 g) were added into the above solution. Thereafter the solution was placed into ice bath and stirred for 10 min. CFC were put into the solution for 2 h polymerization to obtain PPy/CFC, which was then washed with DI water several times and dried in oven at 60 °C for 2 h.

2.2 Fe, W co-doped Co3O4 grown on PPy/CFC (FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC)

Trisodium citrate dehydrate (14.75 g), boric acid (2.56 g), sodium tungstate (19.5 g), iron(II) chloride tetrahydrate (0.49 g) and cobalt chloride hexahydrate (0.59 g) were dissolved into DI water (250 mL). Phosphoric acid (1.9 mL, 85 wt%) was added into the above solution. Then the solution was put under ultrasonic condition for 1 h. After that, the solution was stirred for 12 h to become homogenous. The above solution was added into an electrochemical cell with PPy/CFC as anode, Pt plate as cathode. Electrodeposition was conducted under a constant current density of 40 mA cm−2 for 2 h under 60 °C water bath condition. The deposited FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC was washed with DI water and ethanol for several times. Scheme 1 shows the synthesis of FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC schematically.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Schematic illustration of synthesis of FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC

2.3 Fe, W co-doped Co3O4 grown on CFC (FeWCo3O4/CFC)

The method used was similar to that of the deposition of FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC with CFC being the anode instead of PPy/CFC.

2.4 Characterizations

Scanning electron microscope (SEM, TM 3000, Hetachi, Janpan) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JOEL JEM-2010, Janpan) were used for microstructure and morphology characterizations. X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku D/max IIIA, Cu Kα, λ = 0.15418 nm, Japan) was used for crystalline structure analysis. Raman spectrum was conducted on a HORIBA Raman spectrometer at 488 nm. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Microlab 350) was used to study the surface composition of FeWCo3O4 inside an ultrahigh vacuum system.

2.5 Electrochemical measurements

Linear sweep voltammetry, cyclic voltammetry (CV), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS, 0.01–1000 k Hz frequency) and chronopotentiometric tests were performed on an electrochemical workstation (Solartron Analytical 1470E). A classical three-electrode configuration was used with Pt plate as counter electrode and saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as reference electrode. The measurement was conducted in 1 mol L−1 KOH solution and the polarization curve was tested at a scan rate of 2 mV s−1.

3 Results and discussion

Figure 1a–c displays the SEM images of FeWCo3O4 on the CFC without PPy modification under different magnifications. It can be seen clearly that the deposited FeWCo3O4 layer has many cracks and is easy to be peeled off, leading to poor contact between FeWCo3O4 layer and CFC fiber and resulting in mechanical instability of the FeWCo3O4/CFC structure. In contrast, when the PPy modified CFC is used as substrate, the contact between FeWCo3O4 and substrate is significantly improved (Fig. 1d–f). No cracks can be identified at the surface of the FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC structure. The strong adhesion between FeWCo3O4 and substrate prevents the loss of effective active sites and leads to stable catalytic performance.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a–c SEM images of FeWCo3O4/CFC with different magnifications. df SEM images of FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC with different magnifications. gi TEM image, HRTEM image and corresponding SAED pattern of FeWCo3O4 layer stripped from FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC

The lack of distinct lattice fringes in TEM images (Fig. 1g, h) and the diffuse rings in the corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (Fig. 1i) reveal that the thin FeWCo3O4 nanosheets are amorphous.

Only diffraction peaks of the CFC substrate (JCPDS Card No. 41-1487) can be observed in the XRD pattern of the electrodeposited FeWCo3O4 (Fig. 2a), which further confirms the amorphous structure of the FeWCo3O4 layer. The Raman spectrum reveals the existence of Co3O4 as shown in Fig. 2b. The observed 188, 466, 509, 601, and 671 cm−1 peaks agree well with pure spinel structure of Co3O4 [29]. The two peaks at 1360 and 1590 cm−1 belong to the CFC substrate.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a XRD patterns and b Raman spectra of electrodeposited FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC and FeWCo3O4/CFC

XPS spectrum provides the detailed information of valence states. Co in Co3O4 is actually in a mixed oxidation state of Co2+ and Co3+. As shown in Fig. 3a, Co consists of + 2 and + 3 values which is consistent with Co3O4 composition indicated by Raman spectra. The peaks at 780.48 and 782.03 eV belong to Co 2p3/2 region of Co3+ and Co2+, respectively. The corresponding satellite peak of Co 2p3/2 is observed at 786.23 eV. Peaks of Co 2p1/2 are also observed at 795.48 eV for Co3+ and 797.23 eV for Co2+, accompanied with a satellite peak (denoted as Sat.) at 803.98 eV. Figure 3b shows the Fe2+ 2p3/2 peak at 710.43 eV, with a satellite peak at 715.03 eV. Peaks at 723.73 and 729.03 eV belong to Fe2+ 2p1/2 and the corresponding satellite peaks, respectively. The XPS results reveal that Fe exists only in the valence state of Fe2+. As shown in Fig. 3c, the peaks at 35.45 and 37.58 eV belong to W 4f7/2 and W 4f5/2 of W6+, respectively, indicating that only W6+ exists in the deposited FeWCo3O4. EDS measurement (Fig. S1, Supporting Information) shows that the sample contains the major metal element of Co, with only small amounts Fe and W.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Measurements of a Co 2p XPS, b Fe 2p XPS, c W 4f XPS of FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC

The OER electrocatalytic property was tested in 1.0 M KOH alkaline media at a scan rate of 2 mV s−1 with SCE as reference electrode and Pt plate as counter electrode. The potential measured with the SCE reference electrode can be converted into the potential with respect to the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) according to the following equation:

$$~{\text{E(RHE)}}={\text{E(SCE)}}+(0.059~{\text{pH}}+0.242)~{\text{V}}$$

The polarization curves of FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC and FeWCo3O4/CFC are shown in Fig. 4a. The peaks of the polarization curves near 1.25 V (vs. RHE) may be associated with the reaction: \({\text{C}}{{\text{o}}_3}{{\text{O}}_4}+{{\text{H}}_2}{\text{O}}+{\text{O}}{{\text{H}}^ - } \to 3{\text{CoOOH}}+{{\text{e}}^ - }\). The conductive CoOOH formed on the surface of the electrode is found to be active to the OER [30]. The current density of FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC is higher than FeWCo3O4/CFC beyond 1.55–1.65 V (vs. RHE). This can be explained by the function of PPy which can serve as a conductive binder to improve the conductivity. CV measurement indicates the existence of additional redox current from 1.25 to 1.50 V versus RHE (Figs. S3, S4 Supporting Information). To avoid the disturbance of this redox current, the current density at an overpotential of 400 mV (1.63 V) is used to compare the electrocatalytic performance of the two samples. It can be seen that the FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC free-standing electrode reaches a higher current density of 36.2 mA cm−2 than the FeWCo3O4/CFC (30.7 mA cm−2) does at an overpotential of 400 mV. The Tafel slope of FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC (163 mV dec−1) is slightly lower than that of FeWCo3O4/CFC (177 mV dec−1) (Fig. 4b), which can be ascribed to the enhanced electron transfer from PPy. EIS test indicates the lower resistance of FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC than that of FeWCo3O4/CFC (Fig. 4c). The stability of FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC and FeWCo3O4/CFC is tested by applying a constant current density of 10 mA cm−2 for 12 h (Fig. 4d). The catalytic performance is stable without obvious decay for 12 h. Electrodeposition time is an important factor to influence the catalytic performance of FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC. When the deposition time is 2 h, the sample shows the best electrocatalytic performance (Fig. S2, Supporting Information). The difference in the electrocatalytic performance of samples deposited with different deposition time periods may result from two factors: the number of active sites and electron transportation. The sample with too short deposition time (1 h) may suffer from fewer active sites. However, the sample with too long deposition time (3 h) has thick layers which impedes the electron transfer.

Fig. 4
figure 4

a Polarization curve, b Tafel plot, c EIS plot and d chronopotentiometric curve of FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC and FeWCo3O4/CFC

4 Conclusion

By using a simple anodic electrodeposition method, amorphous Co3O4 co-doped with Fe, W were grown on PPy/CFC substrate. The FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC electrode with additional PPy layer possesses better OER electrocatalytic activities than FeWCo3O4/CFC. PPy can serve as conductive binder to improve the surface contact between FeWCo3O4 active material and the substrate. CFC is flexible and highly conductive, which is also stable at anodic condition during the deposition of FeWCo3O4. The synthesized FeWCo3O4/PPy/CFC free-standing electrode exhibits high OER catalytic performance with a current density of 36.2 mA cm−2 at an overpotential of 400 mV, and a Tafel slope of 163 mV dec−1. This study provides new insight for design and synthesis of highly-efficient OER catalyst.