Abstract
This paper reports on an action research-based professional learning programme (PLP) in which early career teachers volunteered to identify and then research an aspect of their science teaching practice. The PLP was facilitated by academics from the School of Education and the Barbara Hardy Institute at the University of South Australia. The teachers, who worked in low socio-economic areas of Adelaide’s northern suburbs, participated in the programme in order to enhance their pedagogical content knowledge about science. They also shared an interest in connecting their students to the natural world through citizen science. The PLP utilised collaborative practices and engagement within a socio-constructivist pedagogical framework. As a result of their participation, the teachers reported increased confidence to plan and teach units of work that moved away from textbook-orientated approaches to science. Teachers were interviewed at key points during the PLP, and transcripts were analysed against Tytler’s (Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER Press, 2007) proposed curriculum framework for science. This case study identified teacher learning, and the strengths and limitations of the PLP, thus enabling the facilitators to reflect on the programme.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Australian Academy of Science (2010) Primary Connections, Canberra, A.C.T. Australian Capital Territory:Author
Australian Curriculum and Assessment Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2013) Retrieved 8 August 2013 from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/
Berkowitz, A. R. (1997). A simple framework for considering the benefits of SSPs. In K. C. Cohen (Ed.), National Conference on Student and Scientist Partnerships (pp. 38–41). Cambridge, MA: TERC and Concord Consortium.
Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J. & Wilderman, C.C. (2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. Washington DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).
Bowers, C. A. (2001). Education for eco-justice and community. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia.
Bowers, C. A. (2006). Revitalizing the commons: Culture and educational sites of resistance and affirmation. Oxford, UK: Lexington.
Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practical action. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.
Bybee, R.W. (2006). Enhancing science teaching and student learning: A BSCS perspective. Retrieved 28 September 2006 from http://www.acer.edu.au/workshops/conferences.html
Clark, I. & Zeegers, Y. P. (2012). Education for sustainable development: Improving curriculum design in higher education. In C. Daniels & P. Roetman (Eds.), Creating sustainable communities in a changing world (pp. 225–232). Adelaide: Crawford House Publishing, Adelaide, Australia
Cobern, W. W. (1993). Contextual constructivism: The impact of culture on the learning and teaching of science. In K. G. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 51–69). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Cobern, W. W. (1994). World view, culture, and science education. Science Education International, 5(4), 5–8.
Coertjens, L., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Maeyer, D. & Petegem, V. (2010). Do schools make a difference in their students’ environmental attitudes and awareness? Evidence from Pisa 2006 International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 497–522.
Cornish, L. & Jenkins, K. (2012). Encouraging teacher development through embedding reflective practice in assessment. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 159–170.
Department of Education and Children’s Services (2010). South Australian teaching for effective learning (TEFL): South Australian Teaching for Effective Learning Framework Guide: A resource for developing quality teaching and learning in South Australia. Retrieved 28 August 2013 from http://www.learningtolearn.sa.edu.au/tfel/files/links/SA_TfEL_Framework_horizont.pdf
Dickinson, J. & Bonney, R. (Eds.). (2012). Citizen science: Public participation in environmental research. London: Comstock, London, United Kingdom.
Faire, J. & Cosgrove, M. (1993). Teaching primary science. Hamilton, New Zealand: Waikato Education Centre.
Fensham, P. J. (2003). What do the “All” need in science education? In D. Fisher & T. Marsh (Eds.), Third Conference on Science, Mathematics and Technology Education (pp. 1–20). Rhodes University, South Africa: Key Centre for School Science and Mathematics, Curtin University of Technology.
Hayes, D., Mills, M., Christie, P. & Lingard, B. (2006). Teachers and schooling making a difference: Productive pedagogies, assessment and performance. Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Hodson, D. (1993). In search of a rationale for multicultural science education. Science Education, 77(6), 685–711.
Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.
Kim, M., Yoon, H., Ji, Y. & Song, J. (2012). The dynamics of learning science in everyday contexts: A case study of everyday science class in Korea. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 71–97.
Kinna, D. & Paige, K. (2010). Connecting year 9 mathematics to the community: An action research project. In B. Prosser, B. Lucas & A. Reid (Eds.), Connecting lives and learning: Renewing pedagogy in the Middle Years (pp. 60–72). Adelaide: Wakefield Press, Adelaide, Australia.
Mamlok-Naaman, R. & Eilks, I. (2012). Different types of action research to promote chemistry teachers’ professional development—A joined theoretical reflection on two cases from. Israel and Germany International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(3), 581–610.
Matthews, M. (1992). History, philosophy and science teaching: The present rapprochement. Science & Education, 1(1), 11–47.
Matthews, M. (Ed.). (2009). Science, worldviews and education. Springer. Science & Business Media. http://springerlink.bibliotecabuap.elogim.com/book/10.1007/978-90-481-2779-5
Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D. & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes to classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D. & Kull, J. A. (1998). Can we be scientists too? Secondary students’ perceptions of scientific research from a project-based classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7, 149–161.
Murray, J., Cawthorne, G., Dey, C. & Angrew, C. (Eds.). (2012). Enough for all forever: A handbook for learning about sustainability. Champagne, Illinois: Common Ground, Illinois, IL.
Osborne, J. (2006). Towards a science education for all: The role of ideas, evidence and argument. Paper presented at the ACER Research Conference: Boosting Science Learning- What will it take? Canberra, Australia. http://www.acer.edu.au/workshops/conferences.html
Paige, K., Lawes, H., Matejcic, P., Taylor, C., Stewart, V., Lloyd, D. & Daniels, C. et al. (2010). ‘It felt like real science!’: How Operation Magpie enriched my classroom. Teaching Science, 56(4), 25–33.
Paige, K. & Lloyd, D. (2011). Educating for sustainability: A vehicle for engaging primary/middle education students in science. In P. E. J. Roetman & C. B. Daniels (Eds.), Creating sustainable communities in a changing world (pp. 239–247). Adelaide: Barbara Hardy Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Paige, K. & Lloyd, D. (2012). Pedagogical practices and science learning with a focus on sustainability for pre-service primary and middle years educators: Directions and challenges. In M. Daniel & S. W. Hwang (Eds.), Moving forward: Issues and challenges in science education research (pp. 191–208). Singapore: Springer.
Paige, K., Lloyd, D., Zeegers, Y., Roetman, P., Daniels, C., Hoekman, B., Linnell, L., George, L. & Szilassy, D. (2012). Connecting teachers and students to the natural world through Operation Spider: An Aspirations Citizen Science Project. Teaching Science, 58(1), 13–21.
Pedretti, E. (1997). Septic tank crisis: A case study of science, technology and society in an elementary school. International Journal of Science Education, 19(10), 1211–1230.
Prosser, B., Reid, A. & Lucas, B. (Eds.). (2010). Connecting lives and learning: Renewing pedagogy in the middle years. Adelaide: Wakefield Press, Adelaide, Australia.
Rennie, L. (2006). The community’s contribution to science learning: Making it count. Retrieved 23 September 2006 from http://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=research_conference_2006
Riddle, E. M. (1999). Lev Vygotsky’s social development theory. Retrieved 3 March 2007 from http://tonymcarthur.edublogs.org/files/2007/03/vygotsky1.htm
Ritchie, J. & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 173–194). London: Routledge, United Kingdom.
Roetman, P. E. J. (2013). The ‘citizen’ in citizen science: The research, education and engagement of a program based on local wildlife species in South Australia. University of South Australia, Unpublished doctoral thesis, Adelaide.
Roetman, P. E. J. & Daniels, C. B. (2011). The benefits of citizen science in research, education and community engagement. In P. E. J. Roetman & C. B. Daniels (Eds.), Creating sustainable communities in a changing world (pp. 249–260). Adelaide: Crawford House Publishing, Adelaide, Australia.
Rogers, M., Abell, S., Lannin, J., Wang, C., Musikul, K., Barker, D. & Dingman, S. (2007). Effective Professional Development in Science and Mathematics Education: Teachers’ and Facilitators’ Views. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(3), 507–532.
Roth, W.-M. & Désautels, J. (Eds.). (2002). Science education as/for sociopolitical action. New York: Peter Lang, New York, NY.
Solomon, J. & Aikenhead, G. (Eds.). (1994). STS education: International perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press, New York, NY.
Tinker, R. F. (1997). Student scientist partnerships: Shrewd maneuvers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6, 111–117.
Trautmann, N. M., Shirk, J. L., Fee, J. & Krasny, M. E. (2012). Who poses the questions? Using citizen science to help K-12 teachers meet the mandate for inquiry. In J. L. Dickinson & R. Bonney (Eds.), Citizen science: Public participation in environmental research (pp. 179–190). Ithaca, NY: Comstock.
Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER Press.
Tytler, R., Symington, D. & Smith, C. (2011). A curriculum innovation framework for science, technology and mathematics education. Research in Science Education, 41(1), 19–38.
Waldrip, B., Prain, V. & Carolan, J. (2010). Using multimodal representations to improve learning in junior secondary science. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 65–80.
Wilson, J. & Lloyd, D. (2010). Connecting lives and learning: Super size me with science. In B. Prosser, A. Reid & B. Lucas (Eds.), Connecting lives and learning: Action research in the Middle Years of schooling (pp. 73–93). Adelaide: Wakefield Press, Adelaide, Australia.
Zeegers, Y. & McKinnon, H. (2012). ‘Does a spider have fur’? Blending primary science and English language learning for ESL students. Teaching Science, 58(3), 7–13.
Zeegers, Y., Paige, K., Lloyd, D. & Roetman, P. (2012). Operation Magpie: Inspiring primary school teachers through science-focused professional learning experiences. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 28, 27–41.
Zoellick, B., Nelson, S. J. & Schauffler, M. (2012). Participatory science and education: Bringing both views into focus. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 310–313.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paige, K., Zeegers, Y., Lloyd, D. et al. RESEARCHING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A SCIENCE PROFESSIONAL LEARNING PROGRAMME USING A PROPOSED CURRICULUM FRAMEWORK FOR SCHOOLS: A CASE STUDY. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 14, 149–175 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9569-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9569-2