Abstract
This article discusses the contribution to evolutionary theory of Leonard Darwin (1850–1943), the eighth child of Charles Darwin. By analysing the correspondence Leonard Darwin maintained with Ronald Aylmer Fisher in conjunction with an assessment of his books and other written works between the 1910s and 1930s, this article argues for a more prominent role played by him than the previously recognised in the literature as an informal mentor of Fisher. The paper discusses Leonard’s efforts to amalgamate Mendelism with both Eugenics and Darwinism in order for the first to base their policies on new scientific developments and to help the second in finding a target for natural selection. Without a formal qualification in biological sciences and as such mistrusted by some “formal” scientists, Leonard Darwin engaged with key themes of Darwinism such as mimicry, the role of mutations on speciation and the process of genetic variability, arriving at important conclusions concerning the usefulness of Mendelian genetics for his father’s theory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allen, Garland E. 1969. “Hugo De Vries and the reception of the “Mutation Theory.” Journal of the History of Biology 2: 55–87.
Allen, Garland E. 1979. Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Man and his Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Allen, Garland E. 2011. “Eugenics and Modern Biology: Critiques of Eugenics, 1910–1945.” Annals of human genetics 75: 314–325.
A.M.C.S, Review of Leonard Darwin’s Organic Evolution (1921), 1921–1922, The Eugenics Review XIII: 540–543.
Bateson, William. 1913. Mendel’s Principles of Heredity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berg, Leo. S. 1926 (Original Russian version, 1922). Nomogenesis or Evolution Determined by Law. London. Constable & Co Ltd.
Bennett, John H. 1983. Natural Selection Heredity and Eugenics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Berra, Tim M. 2013. Darwin & His Children: His Other Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bowler, Peter J. 1978. “Hugo De Vries and Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Mutation Theory and the Spirit of Darwinism.” Annals of Science 35: 55–73.
Bowler, Peter J. 1983. The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades Around 1900. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bowler, Peter J. 1989a. The Mendelian Revolution: The Emergence of Hereditarian Concepts in Modern Science and Society. London: Athlone Press.
Bowler, Peter J. 1989b. The Invention of Progress: The Victorians and the Past. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Bowler, Peter J. 2003. Evolution: The History of an Idea. Los Angeles: University of California.
Burbridge, David. 1992. “Lacking a Solution?” Nature 335: 118.
Carlson, Elof A. 1981. Genes Radiation and Society: The Life and Work of H. J. Muller. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Carlson, Elof A. 2011. Mutation: The History of an Idea from Darwin to Genomics. New York and Cold Spring Harbour: Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press.
Castle, W. E. 1905. “The Mutation Theory of Organic Evolution, from the Standpoint of Animal Breeding.” Science 536: 521–535.
Chamberlain, Edward J. and Gilman, Sander L. (eds.). 1985. Degeneration the Dark Side of Progress. New York: Columbia University Press.
Chambers, Robert. 1844. Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. London: John Churchill.
Comfort, Nathaniel. 2012. The Science of Human Perfection: How Genes Became the Hearth of American Medicine. New Heaven and London: Yale University Press.
Corcos, Alan F. and Monaghan, Floyd V. 1985. “Role of de Vries in the Recovery of Mendel’s Work. Was de Vries Really an Independent Discoverer of Mendel?” Journal of Heredity 76: 187–190.
Crow, James F. 1988. “Eighty Years Ago: The Beginning of Population Genetics.” Genetics 119: 473–476.
Crow, James F. 1990. “R. A. Fischer a Centennial View.” Genetics 124: 207–211.
Darwin, Charles. 1859. The Origins of Species by Means of Natural Selection: Or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.
Darwin, Charles. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.
Darwin, Charles. 1872. The Expressions of Emotions in Man and Animals. London: John Murray.
Darwin, Leonard. 1897. Bimetallism: A Summary and Examination of the Arguments for and Against a Bimetallic System of Currency. London: John Murray.
Darwin, Leonard. 1912. “The First International Eugenics Congress.” Nature 89: 558–561.
Darwin, Leonard. 1913. “Heredity and Environment.” The Eugenics Review V: 152–153.
Darwin, Leonard. 1917–1918. The Study of Heredity (Preface). The Eugenics Review VIII: 137.
Darwin, Leonard. 1918. “Environment as a Factor in Evolution.” The Eugenics Review X: 63–70.
Darwin, Leonard. 1921. Organic Evolution: Outstanding Difficulties and Possible Explanations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darwin, Leonard. 1922–1923. Observations on Fecundity. The Eugenics Review XIV: 266–269.
Darwin, Leonard. 1924 (Reissued 1968). The Future of our Race Heredity and Social Progress. The Eugenics Review 60: 99–108.
Darwin, Leonard. 1926. The Need for Eugenic Reform. London: John Murray.
Darwin, Leonard. 1926–1927. Natural Selection. The Eugenics Review XVIII: 285–293.
Darwin, Leonard. 1928. Natural Selection – A correction. The Eugenics Review XX: 142–143.
Darwin, Leonard. 1929–1930. The Society’s Coming of Age: The Growth of the Eugenic Movement. The Eugenics Review XXI: 9–20.
Darwin, Leonard. 1930. “Evolution and Evidence.” Nature 25: 126–127.
Darwin, Leonard. 1931–1932. Biology and Eugenics: Being a Request to Certain Professional Biologists. The Eugenics Review XXIII: 21–23.
Darwin, Leonard, Shuster, A., and Maunder, Walter E. 1889. “On the Total Solar Eclipse of August 29, 1886.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 180: 291–350.
Desmond, Adrian and Moore, James. 1992. Darwin. London: Penguin.
De Vries, Hugo. 1901–1903. Die Mutationstheorie. Versuche und Beobachtungen uber die Entstehung von Arten im Planzenreich [hereafter Mutationtheorie], 2 Vols. Leipzig: Veit. English Translation: 1909–1910. The Mutation Theory: Experiments and Observations on the Origins of Species in the Vegetable Kingdom. Chicago. Chicago Open Court.
Dobzhansky, Theodosious. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.
Dobzhansky, Theodosious. 1973. “Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution.” American Biology Teacher 35: 125–129.
Dronamraju, Krishna. 2011. Haldane, Mayr and Beanbag Genetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
E.W.M. 1926. “Review of ‘The Need for Eugenic Reform’, by Leonard Darwin.” Nature 2958: 39–42.
Fisher Box, Joan. 1978. R.A. Fisher: The Life of a Scientist. New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto: Wiley.
Fisher, Ronald A. 1918. “The Correlation Between Relatives on the Supposition of Mendelian Inheritance.” Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 52: 399–433.
Fisher, Ronald A. 1930 (Reissued in 1999). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, A Complete Variorum Edition. J.H. Bennett (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Horder, 1943. The Eugenics Review XXXIV, Leonard Darwin 1850–1943 (Obituary), p. 111.
Huxley, Julian S. 1942/1963 (2nd edn.). Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
Johannsen, Wilhelm. 1915. “Experimentelle Grundlagen der deszendenzlehere: Variabilitat, Vervelung, Kreuzung, Mutation.” C. Chun and W. Johannsen (eds.), Die Kultur der Gegenvart. III. 4. Liepzig and Berlin: B. G. Teubener, pp. 597–660.
Keith, Arthur. 1943. “Major Leonard Darwin (obituary).” Nature 151: 442.
Kevles, Daniel. 1995 (2nd edn.). In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Use of Human Heredity. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
Largent, Mark A. 2009. “The So-called eclipse of Darwinism.” Joe Cain and Michael Ruse (eds.), Descent from Darwin: Insights into the History of Evolutionary Studies, 1900–1970, vol. 99, part I. Philadelphia: Philadelphia Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, pp. 3–21.
MacBride, Ernest W. 1916–1917. “The Study of Heredity.” The Eugenics Review VIII: 218–262.
MacBride, Ernest W. 1929–1930. “Major Leonard Darwin: His Contribution to Eugenics and the Society.” The Eugenics Review XXI, vol. 2 new series.
MacKenzie, Donald. 1976. “Eugenics in Britain.” Social Studies of Science 6: 499–532.
Magnus, David. 2000. “Down the Primrose Path: Competing Epistemologies in Early Twentieth Century Biology.” Richard Creath, Jane Mainschein (eds.), Biology and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–121.
Mayr, Ernst. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mayr, Ernst. 1992. One Long Argument. Charles Darwin and the Genesis of Modern Evolutionary Thought. London: The Penguin Press.
Mayr, Ernst. 2001. What Evolution is. London: Phoenix.
Mayr, Ernst and Provine, William B. 1980. The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives in the Unification of Biology. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
Mazumdar, Pauline MH. 1992. Eugenics, Human Genetics and Human Failings: The Eugenics Society, Its Sources and Its Critics in Britain. London: Routledge.
Monagham, Floyd, Corcos, Alain F. 1990. “The Real Objective of Mendel’s Paper.” Biology & Philosophy 5: 267–292.
Morgan, Thomas H. 1932. The Scientific Basis of Evolution. New York: WH Norton.
Norton, Bernard J. 1973. “The Biometric Defence of Darwinism.” Journal of the History of Biology 6: 283–316.
Olby, Robert C. 1988. “The Dimensions of the Scientific Controversy: The Biometric-Mendelian Debate.” British Journal for the History of Science 22: 299–320.
Olby, Robert C. 1992. “Huxley’s Place in Twentieth Century Biology.” Kenneth C Waters and Albert Van Helden (eds.), Julian Huxley, Biologist and Statesman of Science. Proceedings of a conference held at Rice University 25–27 September 1987. Houston, TX: Rice University Press.
Ortmann, AE. 1907. “Facts and Interpretations in the Mutation Theory.” Science 25: 185–190.
Pearl, Raymond. 1912. “The First International Eugenics Congress.” Science 36: 395–396.
Pearson, Karl. 1914. “On Certain Errors with Regard to Multiple Correlation Occasionally Made by Those who had not Adequately Studied This Subject.” Biometrika 10: 181–187.
Porter, Theodore M. 2004. Karl Pearson: The Scientific Life in a Statistical Age. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Punnett, Reginald C. 1915. Mimicry in Butterflies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richmond, Marshald L. 2006. “The 1909 Darwin Celebration: Reexamining Evolution in the Light of Mendel, Mutation and Meiosis.” Isis 97: 447–484.
Searle, Geoffrey R. 1976. Eugenics and Politics in Britain 1900–1914. Leiden: Noordohoff International Publishing.
Secord, James A. 2000. Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication Reception and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Simpson, George G. 1950. The Meaning of Evolution: A Study of the History of Life and of Its Significance for Man. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smocovities, Vassiliki Betty. 1996. Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Stepan, Nancy. 1982. The Idea of Race in Science: Great Britain 1800–1960. London: Macmillan.
Stepan, Nancy. 1991. The Hour of Eugenics: Race, Gender and Nation in Latin America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
The British Medical Journal 1912. First International Eugenics Congress 31: 253–255.
The Eugenics Review (1912–1913) vol. IV: 217.
The Eugenics Review. 1943. Leonard Darwin, 1850–1943 (Obituary), XXXIV: 109–116.
The Times. 1912. 25th and 26th July. “The First International Congress of Eugenics.”
Theunissen, Bert. 1994. “Closing the Door on Hugo de Vries’ Mendelism.” Annals of Science 51: 225–248.
Yu, Chong Ho. 2004. History of Science and Statistical Education: Examples from Fisherian and Pearsonian Schools. Found at: http://www.creative-wisdom.com/pub/ 2004ASA.pdf. Consulted February, 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The paper assesses the contribution for evolutionary theory of Leonard Darwin, (Charles Darwin’s son) during the first 30 years of the twentieth century.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Serpente, N. More than a Mentor: Leonard Darwin’s Contribution to the Assimilation of Mendelism into Eugenics and Darwinism. J Hist Biol 49, 461–494 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-015-9423-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-015-9423-6