Abstract
This study has reviewed 66 long-term experimental comparisons on Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) and tillage systems in Mediterranean arable crops (from 15 sites located in Greece, Italy, Morocco and Spain), with the aim to identify the biophysical and agronomic variables most associated with C sequestration rate. Data were organized in a dataset containing basic environmental descriptors (elevation, temperature, rainfall), information on soil tillage system (conventional, minimum, no-tillage), soil attributes (pH, particle size distribution and texture), crop rotation, fertilization, time length of the experiment, initial and final SOC stocks. The collected information were analyzed using a data mining approach including Spearman non-parametric correlations, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), hierarchical clustering and step-wise multiple regression. Tillage, crop rotation, and fertilization were the most significant factors affecting C sequestration rate. Non-parametric correlations reported negative coefficients for initial SOC stock, length of the experiment, mineral fertilization, tillage and production system. C sequestration rate increased significantly under no-tillage. Hierarchical clustering indicates that geographical proximity reflects similarity in biophysical conditions and agronomic practices. PCA outlined a positive correlation of SOC with soil depth, elevation and sites located in Spain and a negative correlation with mean air temperature, mineral fertilization, irrigation, experiment’s length and sites located in Greece. C sequestration rate was positively associated with mean air temperature. Finally, a step-wise multiple regression indicated that C sequestration rate increased in sites exposed to colder climate conditions and under no-tillage.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Soil is the key component of the Earth System and interacts with other environmental compartments such as air and water. It regulates the hydrological and erosive processes, supports the biotic activity within the terrestrial ecosystems and influences the biological and geochemical cycles (MEA 2005). Moreover the soil system contributes with many others provisioning and supporting services to the humankind (Bennett et al. 2010; Keesstra et al. 2012; Berendse et al. 2015; Brevik et al. 2015; Decock et al. 2015; Smith et al. 2015). Ecosystem services are included in the recently adopted United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The importance of soils and soil science in issues such as food security, water scarcity, climate change, biodiversity loss and health threats has been stressed largely (Keesstra et al. 2016). In addition, soil science can be used to expand investigation into a more holistic and therefore richer approach to soil research (Brevik et al. 2015).
Soil carbon sequestration is of special interest in the Mediterranean region, where rainfed cropping systems are prevalent, inputs of organic matter to soils are low and mostly rely on crop residues, while losses are high due to the joint impact of biophysical and anthropogenic factors such as intensive and non-conservative farming practices (Farina et al. 2011). The adoption of reduced or no-tillage systems, characterized by a lower soil disturbance in comparison with conventional tillage, has proved to impact positively Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) and other physical and chemical processes and functions, e.g. erosion (Novara et al. 2011; Lieskovský and Kenderessy 2014; Novara et al. 2015; García-Díaz et al. 2016), compaction (Brevik et al. 2002), ion retention, exchange and buffering capacity (Keesstra et al. 2012), water balance and retention (Cerdá et al. 2014; Walraevens et al. 2015), and aggregate stability (Six et al. 2002). Moreover, a reduced tillage intensity usually improves soil biological and biochemical processes (Laudicina et al. 2011; Balota et al. 2014; Laudicina et al. 2015). SOC varies among environments and management systems, and increases with higher precipitation levels (Burke et al. 1989), lower temperatures (Jenny 1980), and higher clay content (Nichols 1984), crop residue inputs (Franzluebbers et al. 1998), and cropping intensity (Grandy and Robertson 2007). SOC is definitely higher in sites with native vegetation compared with cultivated management (Francaviglia et al. 2014), and with no tillage compared with conventional tillage (Farina et al. 2011). Soil type and management (Muñoz-Rojas et al. 2012; Lozano-García and Parras-Alcántara 2014a), landscape (Salvati et al. 2015), and position and slope (Lozano-García and Parras-Alcántara 2014b; Parras-Alcántara et al. 2015) are additional factors shaping the local-scale spatial distribution of SOC.
Tillage management together with other recommended management practices (RMPs) in Mediterranean cropping systems were relatively poorly studied. Aguilera et al. (2013) did not address arable crops specifically, considering indeed orchards and horticulture together, organic farming, cover crops, and the use of external inputs from organic amendments. Most RMPs significantly increased SOC when compared to conventional management. Apart from Aguilera et al. (2013), meta-analyses in Europe were proposed for arable and permanent crops, grasslands, pasture and forests in France (Arrouays et al. 2002; Chenu et al. 2014), arable crops in Spain (González-Sánchez et al. 2012), and RMPs for woody crops in Mediterranean countries (Vicente–Vicente et al. 2016). Virto et al. (2012) found that the effect of carbon input differences was the only factor explaining the changes of SOC in relation to tillage types, mainly due to the variability of crop production response; unfortunately, the number of field studies in Mediterranean countries was very limited in this study. Additional global meta-analyses of different factors affecting C sequestration rates include references from West and Post (2002), Luo et al. (2010), McDaniel et al. (2014), and Poeplau and Don (2015).
Based on an extensive analysis of recent literature reporting comparisons among tillage systems in typical Mediterranean arable crops, this study proposes an exploratory analysis of latent spatial relationships between C sequestration rate and a number of agronomic, environmental and topographic indicators for 66 field comparisons in the Mediterranean Basin. The present approach may substantially improve understanding of soil C dynamics under traditional and intensive agricultural practices and will contribute to a comprehensive monitoring of soil quality, possibly informing local-scale policies of soil conservation in agricultural-specialized areas.
Materials and methods
Literature review and data selection
We reviewed published articles until July 2016 reporting comparisons among tillage systems in typical Mediterranean arable crops, both as monoculture and rotation: barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), corn (Zea mays L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.), forages, legumes, sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), soybean (Glycine max L.). All studies considered here were carried out in areas under a Mediterranean climate type with low summer rainfall; a total of 66 comparisons from 15 studies were available from long-term field experiments in Greece (1), Italy (5), Morocco (1), and Spain (8). Sampling sites were located between 33°00′ and 43°32′ latitude N, 2-860 m a.s.l., with mean annual temperature and rainfall in the range 10.9–19.6 °C and 355–948 mm respectively. The main details of field experiments are shown in Table 1. Based on an aridity index (De Martonne 1926), sites presented the following climate regimes: arid (1), semi-arid (6), sub-humid (6), and humid (3). Data were organized in a dataset containing the main environmental parameters (altitude, temperature, rainfall), soil tillage system information (conventional, minimum and no-tillage), soil parameters (pH, particle size distribution and texture), crop type, rotation, fertilization management, length of the experiment (years), initial and final soil organic carbon stocks (SOCi and SOCf).
SOC data, expressed in Mg C ha−1, have been evaluated in terms of Carbon Sequestration Rate, given by (SOCf-SOCi)/experiment’s length. The increase or decrease of C sequestration is complex and site specific and is influenced by climate conditions, soil characteristics and agronomic management. So, to compare C sequestration rate, the difference in raw data given by the increase over conventional tillage (NT–CT and MT–CT) was evaluated as a measure of the effect size (González-Sánchez et al. 2012; Aguilera et al. 2013). Many studies did not report the bulk density (BD) required to calculate SOC stocks. Missing BD values were calculated with the equation proposed by Aguilera et al. (2013), modified from Howard et al. (1995) and standardized using data from Mediterranean soils:
If soil organic matter concentration SOM was reported, SOC was calculated using the relationship (SOC = 0.58 × SOM). When only concentration data were provided, SOC stock was calculated with the equation:
Since the IPCC (2006) carbon accounting method estimates the change in SOC storage for the top 30 cm of a soil profile, SOCstock was calculated for all the soil layers up to the maximum depth reported (15, 20, 30 and 40 cm).
Statistical analysis
A preliminary exploratory data analysis was performed to evaluate the significance of the different parameters on C sequestration rates with the Kruskal–Wallis test. Results were grouped by environmental and agricultural management according to Table 2, and represented by Box-Whisker plots (central point means, and 95% confidence interval). Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 7.0 (Statsoft, Tulsa, USA).
A data mining approach incorporating Spearman non-parametric correlations, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), hierarchical clustering and step-wise multiple regression was developed using the full sample size composed of 22 quantitative variables including C sequestration rate (Table 2) measured in the 66 comparisons. The analysis’ strategy is aimed at assessing the variety of local biophysical conditions (climate, soil, topography, cropping systems and agricultural practices), and identifying the most associated variables with C sequestration rate, intended as the dependent variable. Spearman non-parametric rank tests were run to assess significant pair-wise correlations (p < 0.05) between C sequestration rate and 21 candidate predictors. A PCA was run on the data matrix constituted by the 22 variables listed above at each of the 66 comparisons. The PCA investigated latent relationships between variables identifying biophysical factors and agronomic practices associated with high or low C sequestration rate at the field spatial scale. Relevant components were selected according to the eigenvalue extracted by the PCA: components with absolute eigenvalue >2 were extracted and analyzed. The linkage between variables and principal components were studied considering loadings >|0.5|. A hierarchical clustering (Euclidean distances, Ward’s agglomeration rule) was run on the same data matrix to identify homogeneous groups of experimental sites based on common biophysical factors. A multiple linear regression model was finally developed to identify factors influencing C sequestration rate (dependent variable) in the 66 comparisons using 21 independent variables as predictors. Predictors were included in the model when the p-level associated to the respective Fisher–Snedecor test was below 0.01. Results of the regression model were illustrated using standardized coefficients and tests of significance for each variable (an overall Fisher–Snedecor’s F-statistic testing for the null-hypothesis of non-significant model and a Student’s t-statistic testing for the null hypothesis of non-significant regression coefficient). A Durbin–Watson statistic testing for the null hypothesis of serially uncorrelated errors was applied separately to regression residuals.
Results and discussion
C sequestration rate (Fig. 1) was influenced significantly by the different tillage systems (p = 0.003), crop rotation (p = 0.05), and fertilization type (p = 0.02). Average values for conventional tillage CT, no-tillage NT and minimum tillage MT were respectively −0.17, 0.30 and −0.12 Mg C ha−1 year−1. The negative value found for MT indicates that this type of tillage in some sites induced a high soil disturbance associated to the deep tillage depth (up to 30 cm, as in Eleftheriadis and Turrión 2014, Table 1), so that in the present dataset, MT was similar to CT as average. As a consequence, to avoid SOC depletion MT depth should be limited to 10–15 cm as a maximum (see Hernanz et al. 2009; Sombrero and de Benito 2010, Table 1). The average differences between C sequestration rates were 0.47 and 0.05 Mg C ha−1 year−1 for NT–CT and MT–CT respectively. The lower C sequestration rate observed under CT may be associated to the higher soil organic matter mineralization than under NT. As a consequence C sequestration rate under NT can be higher even with lower yield and crop residue production. No-till can perform best under rainfed conditions in dry climates (Pittelkow et al. 2015), or in temperate climates when rainfall is a limiting factor during the grain filling period, matching conventional tillage yields on average (Mazzoncini et al. 2008).
Luo et al. (2010) found that conversion from tillage to no-tillage resulted in significant topsoil SOC enrichment, but did not increase the total SOC stock in the whole soil profile. A difference in the distribution of SOC, with higher concentrations near the surface in conservation tillage and higher concentrations in deeper layers under conventional tillage was shown also by Baker et al. (2007).
Crop rotation effect on C sequestration rate was weakly significant being negatively affected by monoculture (–0.28 Mg C ha−1 year−1), and positively by 2-year and mixed (i.e. >2-year) crop rotations (0.11 and 0.63 Mg C ha−1 year−1 respectively). The high value of mixed crop rotation was probably due to the limited number of comparisons available (n = 7). As average, NT–CT and MT–CT differences in Mg C ha−1 year−1 were 0.48 and 0.02 with monoculture, 0.38 and 0.04 with 2-year rotations, and 0.72 and 1.06 in mixed rotations (>2-year).
The average effect of fertilization type was negative under mineral fertilization (−0.17 Mg C ha−1 year−1), positive with the application of mixed fertilization (mineral + crop residues, or mineral + cover crop adoption) and organic fertilization with external inputs (0.17 and 0.72 Mg C ha−1 year−1 respectively). As average, NT–CT and MT–CT differences in Mg C ha−1 year−1 were 0.73 and 0.23 with mineral fertilization, −0.11 and −0.16 with mixed fertilization, and 0.80 with organic fertilization (NT–CT). The negative values observed in NT and MT with mixed fertilization may be related firstly to the presence of bare-fallow in rotation with cereals (see Blanco-Moure et al. 2013) in four sites (−0.88 Mg C ha−1 year−1 as average), and secondly to the recent land use change from the native vegetation in one site of the same study (−3.18 Mg C ha−1 year−1). This finding is supported by Gregory et al. (2016) showing that the land use change from native vegetation to arable crops and bare fallow may result in a SOC loss by 65–78% in the topsoil.
Climate effect on the increase of C sequestration rate when CT is converted to NT was higher in sub-humid and humid conditions (0.49 Mg C ha−1 year−1) and lower in semi-arid and arid climates (0.39 Mg C ha−1 year−1). These results are in agreement with some literature reviews. Six et al. (2004) reported SOC sequestration rates under humid and dry climates of 0.22 and 0.10 Mg C ha−1 year−1, respectively. Franzluebbers (2010), showed a lower C sequestration rate for NT in drier climate in Texas (0.36 Mg C ha−1 year−1) than in the wetter climates in Alabama or Georgia (0.62 Mg C ha−1 year−1 as average). No significant differences in CO2 emissions and SOC changes between untilled and tilled soils were found in arid and humid climates, but with slightly greater differences in arid conditions (Abdalla et al. 2016).
Concerning data mining, non-parametric correlations between C sequestration rate and selected independent variables were illustrated in Fig. 2. Negative coefficients were reported for soil organic C content at the beginning of the study period (SOCi), number of survey years, mineral fertilization, tillage (CT), production system, and a dummy variable indicating Greek experimental sites. C sequestration rate increased significantly in sites where no tillage (NT) was adopted, and in Spanish sites. The PCA extracted four components explaining 61.8% of total variance (Table 3). Component 1 (22.8%) was negatively associated to soil organic C at the end of the study period and to soil depth, elevation and geographical location of experimental sites in Spain. Positive loadings to component 1 were attributed to mean air temperature, mineral fertilization, irrigation, number of survey years and geographical location in Greece. C sequestration rate received a negative loading to component 2 (14.8%) together with mean air temperature. By contrast, soil organic C at the beginning of the study period received a positive loading to that component. Component 3 (13.2%) was positively associated with annual rainfall, mixed fertilization, soil pH and soil organic C at the end of the study period, showing a negative loading with sandy soils. Component 4 (11.0%) was positively correlated to both conservative production system and CT tillage. Hierarchical clustering (Fig. 3) clearly identified the spatial location of the experimental sites considered in this study on the base of biophysical attributes and selected agronomic practices observed at the local scale. Sites in the same area clustered together. The analysis identified four homogeneous groups of sites with specific biophysical attributes, agronomic practices and responses in terms of C sequestration rate. The first group of comparisons is located in Northern-central Spain (ES: ART, BUR, UDL, ADH), the second in the South of Spain, Italy and Greece (ES: COR; IT: FOG, SSQ; EL: FIL), the third uniquely in Central Italy (IT: SPG, AGU), the fourth in Spain and Morocco (ES: TDA, LAN, SOL, MAD, PEN, AGR; MA: SEA).
Results of a step-wise multiple regression with C sequestration rate as the dependent variable and the biophysical/agronomic indicators as predictors are illustrated in Table 4. The best regression model incorporates six predictors (SOCi, SOCf, Temp, pH, Tillage) with adjusted R2 = 0.90 and a significant Fisher–Snedecor F test. The model’s outcomes are in agreement with the findings collected from the non-parametric Spearman analysis (see above). C sequestration rate increased especially in sites with colder climate conditions and under no-tillage. Soil pH and experiment’s length are additional factors influencing C sequestration rate.
Our evidences are in partial agreement with the scientific literature. Aguilera et al. (2013) compared the RMPs with the conventional management, but did not discriminate between arable and woody crops. In detail, NT (n = 33) and reduced tillage (n = 17) showed an increase in C sequestration rate of 0.44 and 0.32 Mg C ha−1 year−1, respectively. González-Sánchez et al. (2012) found increased C sequestration rates of 0.29 Mg C ha−1 year−1 under NT and 0.43 Mg C ha−1 year−1 under MT in maritime Mediterranean areas of Spain. Increase of SOC storage induced worldwide by NT implementation was 0.57 ± 0.14 Mg C ha−1 year−1 (West and Post 2002), and in France 0.20 ± 0.13 Mg C ha−1 year−1 (Arrouays et al. 2002). The potential rates of SOC sequestration by conservation tillage under European temperate climates were 0.5–1.0 and 0.25–0.5 Mg C ha−1 year−1 in humid and dry climates respectively (Lal 2008). The application of organic amendments increased C sequestration rate by 1.31 Mg C ha−1 year−1 and with cover crops by 0.27 Mg C ha−1 year−1 (Aguilera et al. 2013). Crop rotations and cover crops in temperate Europe showed SOC sequestration rates equal to 0.2–0.5 and 0.1–0.2 Mg C ha−1 year−1 in humid and dry climates respectively (Lal 2008). In Spain, González-Sánchez et al. (2012) found C sequestration rates of 1.59 Mg C ha−1 year−1 with the adoption of cover crops, while in Italy Mazzoncini et al. (2011) found an average increase of 0.25 Mg C ha−1 year−1. In a worldwide meta-analysis, Poeplau and Don (2015) found that cover crops had a significant influence on the SOC stock change with a mean annual C sequestration rate of 0.32 ± 0.08 Mg ha−1 year−1. Luo et al. (2010) showed that neither mean annual temperature and rainfall nor nitrogen fertilization and duration of adopting NT affected the response of soil C stock after the conversion from CT, but only the C distribution in the soil profile was changed. Virto et al. (2012) found no effect of soil texture, mean annual temperature and rainfall, and aridity index on C sequestration rates, but showed that C input differences can explain 30% of the variability of SOC stocks differences under NT and CT management; they found also a C sequestration rate comparable with the data from West and Post (2002). McDaniel et al. (2014) studied the effect of crop rotations and cover crops on soil C concentrations with a worldwide meta-analysis. They found that the number of crops in the rotations increased soil C by 1.9 to 7.5%, and with the inclusion of a cover crop the increase was 7.8%. Both mean annual temperature and rainfall were positively correlated with soil C at p = 0.045 and p = 0.008 respectively. Ogle et al. (2005) studied the change in SOC storage in terms of response ratios (RR; given by the ratio of SOC in MT or NT relative to CT). Grouping the studies by climate regime (temperate moist, temperate dry, tropical moist, and tropical dry), they found RR values of 1.09, 1.03, 1.16 and 1.10 respectively in MT treatments, 1.16, 1.10, 1.23 and 1.17 respectively in NT treatments, showing that in temperate dry climates the effect of MT and NT on SOC storage is lower.
Conclusions
The assessment framework proposed in the present study was suitable to evaluate the multifaceted characteristics of soils under different environmental conditions and agronomic practices in Mediterranean landscapes. The intimate relationship between topography, climate, soil C and agronomic practices has been explored using a data mining approach integrating different multivariate statistical techniques. Conservation policies of soils with different quality and C sequestration efficiency may benefit from comprehensive metadata analyses. Reduced soil tillage, improved management of crop residues and application of agro-industry by-products, proved to be the most suitable interventions to enhance organic C stocks in Mediterranean agricultural soils. The adoption of the proposed agricultural practices are part of the “4 per 1000” initiative to reach a 4‰ annual growth rate of the soil carbon stock (http://4p1000.org) and must be encouraged by implementing training and outreach programs for farmers and agricultural development advisers, and supported by:
-
study of the mechanisms and assessment of the potential for carbon storage in soils across regions and systems;
-
evaluation of the performance offered by beneficial farming practices and their consequences for CO2 sequestration and other regulation and production services;
-
facilitating communication between scientists and the stakeholders in agricultural policies and international development.
Future studies are required to better link knowledge from a larger set of contextual variables associated with differential levels of C sequestration efficiency with a comparative analysis of landscapes experiencing anthropogenic and natural disturbances, considering e.g. various processes of land and soil degradation at wide geographical scales.
References
Abdalla K, Chivenge P, Ciais P, Chaplot V (2016) No-tillage lessens soil CO2 emissions the most under arid and sandy soil conditions: results from a meta-analysis. Biogeosciences 13:3619–3633
Aguilera E, Lassaletta L, Gattinger A, Gimeno BS (2013) Managing soil carbon for climate change mitigation and adaptation in Mediterranean cropping systems: a meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 168:25–36
Álvaro-Fuentes J, Plaza-Bonilla D, Arrúe JL, Lampurlanés J, Cantero-Martínez C (2014) Soil organic carbon storage in a no-tillage chronosequence under Mediterranean conditions. Plant Soil 376:31–41
Arrouays D, Balesdent J, Germon GC, Jayet PA, Soussana JF, Stengel P (2002) Contribution à la lutte contre l’effet de serre. Stocker du carbone dans les sols agricoles de France? Expertise Scientifique Collective, Synthèse du rapport. INRA, Paris
Baker JM, Ochsner TE, Venterea RT, Griffis TJ (2007) Tillage and soil carbon sequestration—What do we really know? Agric Ecosyst Environ 118(1):1–5
Balota EL, Machineski O, Honda C, Yada IFU, Barbosa GMC, Nakatani AS, Coyne MS (2014) Response of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in different soil tillage systems to long-term swine slurry application. Land Degrad Dev 27:1141–1150
Barbera V, Poma I, Gristina L, Novara A, Egli M (2012) Long-term cropping systems and tillage management effects on soil organic carbon stock and steady state level of C sequestration rates in a semiarid environment. Land Degrad Dev 23:82–91
Bennett LT, Mele PM, Annett S, Kasel S (2010) Examining links between soil management, soil health, and public benefits in agricultural landscapes: an Australian perspective. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:1–12
Berendse F, van Ruijven J, Jongejans E, Keesstra S (2015) Loss of plant species diversity reduces soil erosion resistance. Ecosystems 18:881–888
Bessam F, Mrabet R (2003) Long-term changes in soil organic matter under conventional tillage and no-tillage systems in semiarid Morocco. Soil Use Manage 19:139–143
Blanco-Moure N, Gracia R, Bielsa AC, Lopez MV (2013) Long-term no-tillage effects on particulate and mineral-associated soil organic matter under rainfed Mediterranean conditions. Soil Use Manage 29:250–259
Brevik EC, Fenton T, Moran L (2002) Effect of soil compaction on organic carbon amounts and distribution, South-Central Iowa. Environ Pollut 116:137–141
Brevik EC, Cerdà A, Mataix-Solera J, Pereg L, Quinton JN, Six J, Van Oost K (2015) The interdisciplinary nature of soil. Soil 1:117–129
Burke IC, Yonker CM, Parton WJ, Cole CV, Flach K, Schimel DS (1989) Texture, climate, and cultivation effects on soil organic matter content in US grassland soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:800–805
Cerdá A, Giménez Morera A, García Orenes F, Morugán A, González Pelayo O, Pereira P, Novara A, Brevik EC (2014) The impact of abandonment of traditional flood irrigated citrus orchards on soil infiltration and organic matter. In: Arnáez J, González-Sampériz P, Lasanta T, Valero-Garcés BL (eds) Geoecología, Cambio Ambiental Y Paisaje. Homenaje Al Profesor José María García Ruiz, Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología, Zaragoza, pp 267–276
Chenu C, Klumpp K, Bispo A, Angers D, Colnenne C, Metay A (2014) Stocker du carbone dans les sols agricoles: évaluation de leviers d’action pour la France. Innov Agron 37:23–37
De Martonne E (1926) Une nouvelle fonction climatologique: l’indice d’aridite. Meteorologie 2:449–458
Decock C, Lee J, Necpalova M, Pereira EIP, Tendall DM, Six J (2015) Mitigating N2O emissions from soil: from patching leaks to transformative action. Soil 1:687–694
Eleftheriadis A, Turrión MB (2014) Soil microbiological properties affected by land use, management, and time since deforestations and crop establishment. Eur J Soil Biol 62:138–144
Farina R, Seddaiu G, Orsini R, Steglich E, Roggero PP, Francaviglia R (2011) Soil carbon dynamics and crop productivity as influenced by climate change in a rain-fed cereal system under contrasting tillage using EPIC. Soil Tillage Res 112:236–248
Francaviglia R, Benedetti A, Doro L, Madrau S, Ledda L (2014) Influence of land use on soil quality and stratification ratios under agro-silvo-pastoral Mediterranean management systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 183:86–92
Franzluebbers AJ (2010) Achieving soil organic carbon sequestration with conservation agricultural systems in the Southeastern United States. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:347–357
Franzluebbers AJ, Hons FM, Zuberer DA (1998) In situ and potential CO2 evolution from a Fluventic Ustochrept in southcentral Texas as affected by tillage and cropping intensity. Soil Tillage Res 47:303–308
García-Díaz A, Allas RB, Gristina L, Cerdà A, Pereira P, Novara A (2016) Carbon input threshold for soil carbon budget optimization in eroding vineyards. Geoderma 271:144–149
González-Sánchez EJ, Ordóñez-Fernández R, Carbonell-Bojollo R, Veroz-Gonzalez O, Gil-Ribes JA (2012) Meta-analysis on atmospheric carbon capture in Spain through the use of conservation agriculture. Soil Tillage Res 122:52–60
Grandy AS, Robertson GP (2007) Land-use intensity effects on soil organic carbon accumulation rates and mechanisms. Ecosystems 10(1):59–74
Gregory AS, Dungait JAJ, Watts CW, Bol R, Dixon ER, White RP, Whitmore AP (2016) Long-term management changes topsoil and subsoil organic carbon and nitrogen dynamics in a temperate agricultural system. Eur J Soil Sci 67(4):421–430
Hernanz JL, López R, Navarrete L, Sánchez-Girón V (2005) Long-term effects of tillage systems and rotations on soil structural stability and organic carbon stratification in semiarid central Spain. Soil Tillage Res 66:129–141
Hernanz JL, Sánchez-Girón V, Navarrete L (2009) Soil carbon sequestration and stratification in a cereal/leguminous crop rotation with three tillage systems in semiarid conditions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 133:114–122
Howard PJA, Loveland PJ, Bradley RI, Dry FT, Howard DM, Howard DC (1995) The carbon content of soil and its geographical-distribution in Great-Britain. Soil Use Manage 11:9–15
IPCC (2006) Guidance for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. In: Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) Agriculture, Forestry and other Land Use, vol 4. IGES, Japan
Jenny H (1980) The soil resource: origin and behavior. Ecological studies, vol Vol. 37. Springer, New York, p 377
Keesstra SD, Geissen V, van Schaik L, Mosse K, Piiranen S (2012) Soil as a filter for groundwater quality. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4:507–516
Keesstra SD, Bouma J, Wallinga J, Tittonell P, Smith P, Cerdà A, Montanarella L, Quinton JN, Pachepsky Y, van der Putten WH, Bardgett RD, Moolenaar S, Mol G, Jansen B, Fresco LO (2016) The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Soil 2:111–128
Lal R (2008) Soil carbon stocks under present and future climate with specific reference to European ecoregions. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 81:113–127
Laudicina VA, Badalucco L, Palazzolo E (2011) Effects of compost input and tillage intensity on soil microbial biomass and activity under Mediterranean conditions. Biol Fertil Soils 47:63–70
Laudicina VA, Novara A, Barbera V, Egli M, Badalucco L (2015) Long-term tillage and cropping system effects on chemical and biochemical characteristics of soil organic matter in a Mediterranean semiarid environment. Land Degrad Dev 26:45–53
Lieskovský J, Kenderessy P (2014) Modelling the effect of vegetation cover and different tillage practices on soil erosion in vineyards: a case study in Vráble (Slovakia) using WATEM/SEDEM. Land Degrad Dev 25:288–296
López-Bellido RJ, Fontán JM, López-Bellido FJ, López-Bellido LL (2010) Carbon sequestration by tillage, rotation, and nitrogen fertilization in a Mediterranean Vertisol. Agron J 102:310–318
López-Fando C, Pardo MT (2009) Changes in soil chemical characteristics with different tillage practices in a semi-arid environment. Soil Tillage Res 104:278–284
López-Fando C, Pardo MT (2011) Soil carbon storage and stratification under different tillage systems in a semi-arid region. Soil Tillage Res 111:224–230
Lozano-García B, Parras-Alcántara L (2014a) Land use and management effects on carbon and nitrogen in Mediterranean cambisols. Agric Ecosyst Environ 179:208–214
Lozano-García B, Parras-Alcántara L (2014b) Variation in soil organic carbon and nitrogen stocks along a toposequence in a traditional Mediterranean olive grove. Land Degrad Dev 25:297–304
Luo Z, Wang E, Sun OJ (2010) Can no-tillage stimulate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils? A meta-analysis of paired experiments. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:224–231
Mazzoncini M, Di Bene C, Coli A, Antichi D, Petri M, Bonari E (2008) Rainfed wheat and soybean productivity in a long-term tillage experiment in central Italy. Agron J 100(5):1418–1429
Mazzoncini M, Sapkota TB, Bàrberi P, Antichi D, Risaliti R (2011) Long-term effect of tillage, nitrogen fertilization and cover crops on soil organic carbon and total nitrogen content. Soil Tillage Res 114:165–174
Mazzoncini M, Antichi D, Di Bene C, Risaliti R, Petri M, Bonari E (2016) Soil carbon and nitrogen changes after 28 years of no-tillage management under Mediterranean conditions. Eur J Agron 77:156–165
McDaniel MD, Tiemann LK, Grandy AS (2014) Does agricultural crop diversity enhance soil microbial biomass and organic matter dynamics? A meta-analysis. Ecol Appl 24:560–570
MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington, p 137
Muñoz-Rojas M, Jordán A, Zavala L, De la Rosa D, Abd-Elmabod SK, Anaya- Romero M (2012) Organic carbon stocks in Mediterranean soil types under different land uses (Southern Spain). Solid Earth 3:375–386
Nichols JD (1984) Relation of organic carbon to soil properties and climate in the southern Great Plains. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:1382–1384
Novara A, Gristina L, Saladino SS, Santoro A, Cerdà A (2011) Soil erosion assessment on tillage and alternative soil managements in a Sicilian vineyard. Soil Tillage Res 117:140–147
Novara A, Cerdá A, Dazzi C, Lo Papa G, Santoro A, Gristina L (2015) Effectiveness of carbon isotopic signature for estimating soil erosion and deposition rates in Sicilian vineyards. Soil Tillage Res 152:1–7
Ogle SM, Breidt FJ, Paustian K (2005) Agricultural management impacts on soil organic carbon storage under moist and dry climatic conditions of temperate and tropical regions. Biogeochemistry 72:87–121
Parras-Alcántara L, Lozano-García B, Galán-Espejo A (2015) Soil organic carbon along an altitudinal gradient in the Despeñaperros Natural Park, southern Spain. Solid Earth 6:125–134
Pittelkow CM, Linquist BA, Lundy ME, Liang X, van Groenigen KJ, Lee J, van Gestel N, Six J, Venterea R, van Kessel C (2015) When does no-till yield more? A global meta-analysis. Field Crop Res 183:156–168
Poeplau C, Don A (2015) Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils via cultivation of cover crops–A meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 200:33–41
Salvati L, Ferrara C, Barone PM (2015) Exploring the multiplicity of soil-human interactions: organic carbon content, agro-forest landscapes and the Italian Local Communities. Environ Monit Assess 187(5):1–14
Six J, Conant RT, Paul EA, Paustian K (2002) Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturation of soils. Plant Soil 241:155–176
Six J, Ogle SM, Breidt FJ, Conant RT, Mosier AR, Paustian K (2004) The potential to mitigate global warming with no-tillage management is only realized when practiced in the long term. Global Change Biol 10:155–160
Smith P, Cotrufo MF, Rumpel C, Paustian K, Kuikman PJ, Elliott JA, McDowell R, Griffiths RI, Asakawa S, Bustamante M, House JI, Sobocká J, Harper R, Pan G, West PC, Gerber JS, Clark JM, Adhya T, Scholes RJ, Scholes MC (2015) Biogeochemical cycles and biodiversity as key drivers of ecosystem services provided by soils. Soil 1:665–685
Soil Survey Staff (2011) Soil Survey Laboratory Information Manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 45, Version 2.0. Burt R (ed). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Sombrero A, de Benito A (2010) Carbon accumulation in soil. Ten-year study of conservation tillage and crop rotation in a semi-arid area of Castile-Leon, Spain. Soil Tillage Res 107:64–70
Troccoli A, Maddaluno C, Mucci M, Russo M, Rinaldi M (2015) Is it appropriate to support the farmers for adopting conservation agriculture? Economic and environmental impact assessment. Ital J Agron 10:169–177
Vicente-Vicente JL, García-Ruiz R, Francaviglia R, Aguilera E, Smith P (2016) Soil carbon sequestration rates under Mediterranean woody crops using recommended management practices: a meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 235:204–214
Virto I, Barré P, Burlot A, Chenu C (2012) Carbon input differences as the main factor explaining the variability in soil organic C storage in no-tilled compared to inversion tilled agrosystems. Biogeochemistry 108:17–26
Walraevens K, Gebreyohannes Tewolde T, Amare K, Hussein A, Berhane G, Baert R, Ronsse S, Kebede S, Van Hulle L, Deckers J, Martens K, Van Camp M (2015) Water balance components for sustainability assessment of groundwater-dependent agriculture: example of the Mendae Plain (Tigray, Ethiopia). Land Degrad Dev 26:725–736
West TO, Post WM (2002) Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by tillage and crop rotation: a global data analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:1930–1946
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Francaviglia, R., Di Bene, C., Farina, R. et al. Soil organic carbon sequestration and tillage systems in the Mediterranean Basin: a data mining approach. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 107, 125–137 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-016-9820-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-016-9820-z