Abstract
The current study determined Tor putitora (Hamilton, 1822) fishery, growth, mortality, and population characteristics using length-frequency data assembled monthly from the Tehri dam reservoir in Uttarakhand from January to December 2022. The estimation data was separated into 40-mm class intervals, and population parameters were investigated and computed using the FiSAT-II software tool. W = 0.0101 L2.996, where a = 0.0101 and b = 2.99, were determined as the length-weight relationships, and the growth performance index (ϕ) was computed to be 5.40. Tor putitora commercial catches in the Tehri dam reservoir were dominated by length groups of 360–399 and 320–359 mm. Different growth parameters were estimated using length-frequency data as L∞ = 987.00 mm, K = 0.26 yr−1, and t0 = −0.0003 years. Z, M, and F mortality coefficients were estimated to be 1.01, 0.27, and 0.73, respectively. At the end of the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh years, the fish measured 226, 400, 535, 638, 718, and 780, and 827, respectively. The estimated value of the exploitation rate (E) was 0.73 using the length-converted catch curve approach, which was determined to be somewhat higher than the optimum value (0.50). Tor putitora recruitment patterns from the Tehri dam reservoir reveal that the species only has one recruitment pattern every year, and that solely occurs from June to September. The current exploitation level (0.73) has already exceeded the maximum fishing pressure (Emax = 0.508), indicating that there is a decline in the catch at the current fishing pressure, and a further increase in fishing efforts may lead to a decline in the stock, which may be detrimental to the sustainable fishery of Tor putitora in the Tehri dam reservoir, Uttarakhand, India.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
When compared to other Himalayan fishes, Tor putitora is one of the most attractive freshwater fish species, a favourably popular game fish, an “intangible and intelligent” fish species, a ‘flagship’ species, and an angler’s delight (Everard & Kataria, 2011; Gupta, Sivakumar, et al., 2014b). Species of the genus Tor, as well as those of the genera Naziritor and Neolissochilus, are commonly referred to as mahseer. There are 46 mahseer species worldwide, with 23 belonging to the genus Tor, 22 to the genus Neolissochilus, and one to the genus Naziritor (Eschmeyer et al., 2004; Pinder et al., 2019). T. putitora, often known as the golden or Himalayan mahseer, is the largest mahseer species in India, growing to 275 cm in length and weighing 54 kg (Everard & Kataria, 2011; Nautiyal et al., 2008; Talwar & Jhingran, 1991). Tor putitora can be found in the South Himalayan drainage rivers (namely the Brahmaputra, Ganges, and Indus) from India to Pakistan, Bhutan, Myanmar, and Nepal, with its range also extending into the Eastern Brahmaputra catchments, which include the north-eastern states of India and Bangladesh (Rahman, 1989a, b).
The fish is exploited due to its size, golden colour, stunning look, and deliciousness, becoming a significant fishery around the Himalayan foothills. Anglers view the endangered T. putitora as one of the finest sport fishes, and it serves entertainment to sportsmen both in India and overseas. Golden Mahseer has been recognized as a valuable fish variety by fishermen because of its larger size, firm texture, high trade value, and extended shelf life. Mahseers have been declining in number and size in various parts of India in recent years (Joshi, 1988; Joshi & Raina, 1997; Pathani, 1994; Sehgal, 1971; Sehgal, 1991) due to undiscriminating fishing of brood stock and juveniles, rapid environmental deprivation of aquatic ecosystems, and dam, barrage, and weir construction as part of river valley projects (Nautiyal, 1990, 1994). As a result, the mahseer stock is threatened by several factors, including overfishing and the decreasing yield from various fish sources.
The mathematical relationship between fish length and weight is a useful measure to evaluate overall health, growth, maturity, and reproduction (LeCren, 1951), and length-weight relationships are additional tools that fishery biologists can use to assess population health (Cone, 1989). The asymptotic length, which is based on the length-weight connection, is an important component of Beverton and Holt’s (1957) dynamic pool model. Estimating population factors aids in determining the most effective strategy to use and manage aquatic life resources such as fish and prawns (Sparre & Venema, 1998). It employs a variety of statistical and mathematical models to provide quantitative estimates of how different management approaches will affect fish populations (Sparre & Venema, 1998). It is required to examine how various environmental changes affect the biological and physical properties of a fish species, family, or group using various population parameter models (Beverton & Holt, 1957). Population dynamics in fin and shellfish are essential because they aid in understanding population production rates by estimating growth, mortality, and recruitment patterns (Bhakta et al., 2020; Chung & Woo, 1999). Because these characteristics influence population dynamics, they provide useful information on breeding regularity, individual and stock rejoinders to environmental changes, recruitment success, and stock structure, among other areas (Chirwatkar et al., 2021). Stock assessment demands providing objective scientific and quantitative studies for fisheries management (Hilborn & Walters, 1992). Due to the data requirements of classic or conventional stock assessment methodologies, only about half of the exploited fish species have been assessed globally (Ricard et al., 2012).
Dams were generally built to serve as water reservoirs, in addition to additional services such as flood control, irrigation, hydropower generation, water supply, fishery activities, and so on (Bid & Siddique, 2019b; Bid & Siddique, 2022). Every dam has an estimated volume of water holding capacity at the time of construction, but it gradually decreases due to siltation (Bid & Siddique, 2019a; Bid & Siddique, 2019b), which also applies to the Tehri dam reservoir. The construction of any dam offers various advantages as well as disadvantages for the local inhabitants (Bid & Siddique, 2019b). The Tehri Dam (261 m) on the Bhagirathi River near Tehri in Uttarakhand is India’s most recent dam (Bid, 2016). Tehri Dam is a rock and earth-fill embankment dam that creates a 3.54 cubic kilometre reservoir with a surface area of 52 km2. The massive multipurpose Tehri dam reservoir is located near the confluence of the Bhagirathi and Bhilangana rivers in old Tehri town, about 80 km upstream from Rishikesh in Uttarakhand’s Garhwal region. Both rivers originate in the higher Himalayan glaciers and flow through deep gorges, lush forests, and human settlements. The Gaumukh river is the source of the Bhagirathi, whereas the Khatling glacier is the source of the Bhilangana (Khadse et al., 2019).
Tor putitora, an important cold-water sport fish, is reported to be diminishing owing to overfishing and habitat loss. Data from many ecosystems is required for restoration to determine the causative causes responsible for its decrease (Nautiyal & Lal, 1984a, b). Golden Mahseer numbers have dropped dramatically because of overexploitation, and the fish is now listed as an ‘endangered’ species on the IUCN Red List Status (IUCN, 2022). Many researchers have documented an alarming decline in mahseer population size and quantity, notably in subcontinental mountain rivers (Dinesh et al., 2010; Gupta et al. 2014b, b; Nautiyal, 2014; Nautiyal et al. 2008).
The relevant works on biology of Tor putitora have been carried out by Mirza (1976), Das and Pathani (1978), Pathani (1981, 1983), Pathani and Das (1979a, b), Johal and Tandon (1981), Nautiyal and Lal (1982, 1984a, b, 1985, 1988), Nautiyal (1984a, b, 1994), Dasgupta (1991a, b), Bhatt et al. (1998, 2000), Kishor et al. (1998), Nautiyal et al. (1997, 2008), Joshi et al. (2018). Most of these documents have concentrated on the biology and ecology of the fish but not as much on its growth, mortality, and population stocks.
Materials and methods
Sampling sites and collection of samples
Between January and December 2022, length frequency data was obtained from the Tehri reservoir’s Dobra Chanti landing center (Fig. 1). The Tehri reservoir is India’s tallest dam, built near the confluence of the rivers Bhagirathi and Bhilangana in Uttrakhand. Before the dam, the Bhagirathi River flowed freely to Devprayag. The Bhagirathi’s 46-km route from Chinyalisaur to Koti Colony is currently being turned into a massive Tehri reservoir. The reservoir completely obstructed mahseer’s upstream and downstream migrations. The sampling sites (Dobra Chanti) are located at 30o 26′ 49.6” N and 78o 25′ 59.5″ E. The samples were collected at monthly intervals using gill nets with mesh sizes ranging from 40 to 90 mm and cast nets with mesh sizes ranging from 15 to 20 mm.
Total fish and T. putitora catch data were collected monthly from the Dobra Chanti landing center of the Tehri dam reservoir. The total length (TL) and weight of the fish specimens were measured to the nearest 0.01 g using a measuring board and an electronic balance. The TL was calculated by measuring the distance between the tip of the snout and the tip of the longest caudal fin rays. On the day of sampling, the total catch of the species was observed and recorded. For the growth parameter and other population parameter assessments, length-frequency data was acquired and divided into 40 mm class intervals.
Population parameters
By entering the pooled sample at 40 mm class intervals at the ELEFAN I module of FiSAT-II software version 1.2.2 (Gayanilo Jr et al., 1996), the von Bertalanffy growth parameters L∞ and K were determined. The age at zero length (t0) was calculated using Pauly’s (1979) empirical equation.
Where Lα is the asymptotic length, and K is the growth coefficient.
Utilizing the von Bertalanffy growth function, it was possible to estimate the growth and age:
Where Lt is the fish’s length at age t, e is the exponential growth coefficient, Lα is the asymptotic length, K is the growth coefficient, and t0 is the age at zero length (initial condition parameter).
The growth performance index (ϕ) for the T. putitora population in terms of length growth was determined using the index of Pauly and Munro (1984).
Mortality parameters
The total mortality (Z) was calculated using the FiSAT application utilizing the length converted catch curve technique (Pauly 1983), and the natural mortality was estimated using Pauly’s (1980) empirical formula:
Fishing mortality (F) was calculated as F = Z - M, where M is the instantaneous rate of natural mortality and Z is the instantaneous rate of total mortality. The F/Z equation was used to estimate the exploitation ratio (E).
Yield per recruit analysis
Through FiSAT II, the selection ogive approach was utilized to quantify relative yield per recruit (Y′/R) and biomass per recruit (B/R) as a function of exploitation level (E).
Virtual population analysis
Thompson and Bell’s (1984) and Gulland’s (1983) techniques (1969) were used to create relevant data for length-structured virtual population analysis (VPA). The species’ inputs for the VPA (exponent value) were the estimated values of L, K, M, F, a (the length-weight relationship constant), and b (the length-weight relationship constant).
Water parameters
Water quality measurements were taken bimonthly at the chosen sample sites using the APHA-recommended techniques. To reduce the standard error, samples from each location were taken in triplicate (Apha et al., 2012). Deepness, water temperature (°C), transparency, dissolved oxygen, pH, specific conductivity, total alkalinity, and other factors were among the parameters. Throughout the sampling periods, a precisely defined sample hour (between 9.00 and 10.00 am) was maintained to allow for cross-temporal and cross-spatial comparison of the obtained parameters.
Results and discussion
Fishery, length-frequency distribution, and length-weight relationships
The total fish catch at the Dobra Chanti landing site was 2079.9 kg from January to December 2022, with T. putitora accounting for 94.13% of the catch composition (1969.5 kg) (Fig. 2). T. putitora was primarily caught using drift gillnets and cast nets, with the maximum production occurring in April and the lowest in September. During the spawning season of mahseer in the Tehri dam reservoir area, which runs from June to August, no or very limited fishing was recorded.
For the stock assessment study, length-frequency information for 476 T. putitora specimens was gathered and analysed from January to December 2022. The specimens measured 13.10 to 93.10 cm and weighed 23.90 to 8095.70 g. The specimens’ average length was 37.52 ± 7.56 cm (mean ± SD), and the mean weight was calculated to be 617.41 ± 662.64 g. The length groups 360–399 and 320–359 mm dominated the commercial captures of T. putitora in the Tehri dam reservoir, according to length-frequency data analysis (Fig. 3). The length-weight relationships were determined to be W = 0.0101 L2.996, where a = 0.0101 and b = 2.996, with an adjusted r2 value of 0.999, suggesting that the examined species grew isometrically. Figure 4 illustrates both the LWR curve and the regression equation.
Mahseer is one of the most threatened species in natural ecosystems (both rivers and reservoirs), and its abundance is rapidly plummeting. Gobind Sagar reservoir, formerly known as the Mahseer Storehouse, contributed as much as 9.0% of total capture in 1984–1995 but dropped to 1.0% in 1999–2000. During the 2016–17 season in the Pong reservoir, mahseer contributed 28.34 t, accounting for 7.42% of the total catch. According to IUCN (2015) and Sharma et al. (2015), T. putitora has decreased by more than 50% in the past and may decline by 80% in the future, owing to river management. T. putitora is threatened by dams, barrages, and illicit sand/boulder mining, as well as poaching and indiscriminate brooder fishing (Gupta et al. 2014b, b, 2015; Lakra et al., 2010; Nautiyal, 2014; Pandit & Grumbine, 2012; Sharma et al., 2015).
The species’ highest length was 931 mm, and length groups of 360–399 and 320–359 mm dominated commercial catches of T. putitora at the Tehri dam reservoir in Uttarakhand, India. While Banarescu and Coad (1991) recorded the species’ largest length as 2750 mm and maximum published weight as 54.0 g (Rahman, 1989a, 1989b). While Singh et al. (2009) used non-linear statistical models to estimate the maximum size of T. putitora in different aquatic environments, they revealed that the species may attain a maximum length of approximately 3097 mm in Kumaun Lake and 2994 mm in Gobind Sagar, respectively. According to Nautiyal et al. (2008), the highest size of T. putitora from the Himalayan stretches of the Ganga River system was 137.7 and 135.9 cm in 1980–81 and 1994–95, respectively.
According to Bhatt et al. (2004), T. putitora from the mountain reaches to the Ganga dominated the catch composition of 250–320 mm length groups (27.9%), followed by the 340–370 mm length group with a 26.01% share. Singh and Nautiyal (2018) examined the length-frequency composition of the migratory population of putitora mahseer in the Alaknanda River near Srinagar, India, and determined that length groups of 300–400 mm dominated commercial catch compositions. While performing the study, we observed that the length groups of 360–399 mm dominated the length groups (39.08%), followed by 320–359 mm length groups (33.61%), which might be attributed to the adoption of higher mesh size nets.
We recognized an isometric growth pattern of T. putitora collected from the Tehri dam reservoir region of Uttarakhand in our study. Awas et al. (2020) reported a negative allometric growth pattern (b = 2.982) of T. putitora from the River Poonch in the Pir Panjal Himalaya, India; Sharma et al. (2015) from the Poonch region of Jammu and Kashmir, India (b = 2.940); Mir et al. (2015) from the Ganga River basin tributary in Uttarakhand, India (b = 2.972), among others. Naeem et al. (2011) found that cultivated and wild T. putitora specimens from Pakistan’s Attock District and River Korang had b values of 2.860 and 2.850, respectively, with no significant differences between farmed and wild stock. Pervaiz et al. (2012) observed an appealing allometric growth trend (b = 3.210, and 3.140) of T. putitora from the Attock region of Pakistan. Table 1 summarizes the comparative length-weight relationship of T. putitora performed by other researchers in different bodies of water.
According to Ali et al. (2014), T. putitora grows in an isometric pattern and grows more slowly than other fish in its environment (Pathani & Das, 1980). Unprecedented river management and water withdrawals through a succession of dams are expected to endanger the expansion of the fish population in Himalayan rivers because lotic waters are regarded as more favourable to growth than lentic waters (Gupta, Nautiyal, et al., 2014a; Pandit & Grumbine, 2012).
Age and population parameters
The growth parameters L∞ and K were estimated using the ELEFAN approach to be 987.00 mm and 0.26 yr−1, respectively (Fig. 5), and the value for t0 was calculated to be −0.0003 years. According to the asymptotic length value, T. putitora can grow to 987.00 mm in the Tehri Dam reservoir if not subjected to fishing activities. The estimated growth performance index φ′ was calculated as 5.40. The presence of 15 growth curves, suggesting the presence of 15 cohorts or size groups of T. putitora in the Tehri dam reservoir, was discovered by superimposing length-frequency growth curves. As a result, T. putitora achieved lengths of 226, 400, 535, 638, 718, 780, and 827 mm after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 years, respectively (Fig. 6). The largest size measured in this study was 93.10 cm, with an estimated age of 11.25 years.
For the management and evaluation of fisheries, estimating a fish population’s age and growth is essential. These projections, in general, aid in understanding the age distribution of the fluctuating catch, the maturity size at the time of capture, and the composition of the fish population. There have been few reports on the growth features of T. putitora from various water bodies in India and its bordering countries. Sparre and Venema (1998) determined that the growth coefficient k = 1.0 yr−1 for fast-growing fish, 0.5 yr−1 for moderate-growth fish, and 0.2 yr−1 for slow-growing fish. The current value of k = 0.26 shows that the species grows slowly. The current study also discovered a lower value of L∞ than Nautiyal et al. (2008), who both analysed Ganga River dimensions in the Himalayas. Nautiyal et al. (2008) estimated k = 0.035 yr−1 (1980–81) and 0.041 yr−1 (1994–95) of T. putitora from the Ganga River system in the Himalayas. Pathak (1991) found a low value of k = 0.070 for T. putitora specimens taken from the Sarju River in the Kamaun Himalaya. Changes in water parameters, food availability, metabolic activity, and pollution are just a few of the many factors that may trigger L∞ and K changes within the same species (Sparre & Venema, 1998).
In the current study, the ϕ’ value (5.40) was found to be slightly higher than that of Pathak’s (1991). They discovered a value of 3.19 in specimens obtained from the Sarju River in the Kamaun Himalaya. In general, phi-prime values vary between 2 and 4 and are stable across species, families, and taxonomic groups (Mazumdar et al. 2012; Bhakta et al., 2020). The variation between species is mostly due to changes in K values, environmental variability, and various fishing intensities (Mazumdar et al. 2012). Abowei (2010) attributes a high-performance index to fish survival tactics’ capacity to elude predators by growing swiftly and minimizing the risk of becoming prey.
Based on the scale ring count, T. putitora can grow to lengths of 190–220 mm, 250–231 mm, 340–370 mm, 430–460 mm, 520–550 mm, 580–610 mm, 580–670 mm, and 790–820 mm at the age groups of 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+, 5+, 6+, 7+, and 8+, according to Bhatt et al. (2004). They also saw a single specimen of 980 mm in length from the 9+ age group.
T. putitora were discovered by Johal et al. (1999) and Bhatt et al. (2004) in the Ganga River in Uttarakhand and the Gobind Sagar reservoir in Himachal Pradesh, respectively, at ages of 15+ and 17+. Bhatt et al. (2004) noted 5+ age classes in males and 9+ age classes in females in the Ganga foothills. We discovered that T. putitora can grow at 226, 400, 204, 535, 638, 718, 780, and 827 mm at the end of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 years in our study, which is almost identical to earlier work. Table 2 summarizes other researchers’ comparative population parameters (L∞, K, and t0) investigations of T. putitora from different water bodies.
Mortality and exploitation parameters
The total yearly mortality rate (Z) was determined using the length-converted catch curve approach by integrating the values of L∞ and K. Total mortality (Z) was estimated to be 1.01 using the average yearly surface temperature of the Tehri dam reservoir throughout the study period of 16.2 °C; natural mortality (M) was 0.27, and fishing mortality (F) was 0.74. Fishing mortality was discovered to be somewhat higher than natural mortality. The calculated exploitation level (E) was 0.73 (Fig. 7), which was determined to be more than the optimum exploitation rate (0.5). Table 3 displays the various population parameters of T. putitora estimated from the Tehri dam reservoir.
The current study estimated overall mortality (Z), natural mortality (M), and fishing mortality (F) to be 1.01, 0.27, and 0.73, respectively, based on length-converted catch curve analysis. According to Nautiyal et al. (2008), T. putitora specimens collected from the Himalayan stretch of the Ganga River System had a M value of 0.054. The amount of fishing, disease, pollution, predation, old age, and other factors all have an impact on fishing mortality (Bhakta et al., 2020; Johnson et al., 2020).
Probability of capture, recruitment pattern, and yield per recruit
The estimated length values for T. putitora capture probabilities of 25% (L25), 50% (L50), and 75% (L75) were 241.72 mm, 273.90 mm, and 307.12 mm, respectively (Fig. 8). T. putitora recruitment from the Tehri dam reservoir indicates that the species has a distinct recruitment period from June to September (Fig. 9). It is also possible that spawning of T. putitora from the Tehri dam reservoir begins in June and may continue until September.
The relative yield per recruit (Y′/R) and biomass per recruit (B/R) of T. putitora were calculated using the FiSAT-II selection ogive procedure (Fig. 10). The input data to estimate those were Lc/L∞ (0.278) and M/K value (1.04). The estimated Emax, E0.1, and E0.5 values from the relative yield per recruit (Y/R) analysis were 0.409, 0.314, and 0.508, respectively. The current estimation revealed that the maximum yield for T. putitora could be obtained at an E value of 0.508. Furthermore, when E = 0.314, 50% of the biomass could be obtained as a yield, as shown in red in Fig. 10.
The probability of capturing any stock at different length groups is a crucial management consideration for fisheries (Bhakta et al., 2022; Mustafa et al., 2021). T. putitora length at first capture (Lc) was 273.90 mm, which is much smaller than the 770.5 mm length regarded as the size at first maturity as reported by Nautiyal (1994). There are few opinions on T. putitora reproductive capacity in various water bodies in India. T. putitora spawns twice a year, according to Johal and Tandon (1981), around April–May, and Malik (2011), between July and October. Initially, Khan (1939) discovered that T. putitora had three spawning seasons, which is contradicted by Hora (1940). According to Nautiyal (1994), the spawning season of T. putitora from the Alaknanda and Nayar, two key tributaries of the river Ganga and regarded as an annual breeder in the Garhwal Himalayas, occurs between July and September. T. putitora, on the other hand, spawns all year in India’s Bhakra reservoir, according to Bhatnagar (1964). Snow trout, Schizothorax richardsonii spawn twice a year (July–October and January–February) in the river Gaula (Kumaon, Himalaya), according to Mohan (2011). Joshi et al. (2018) observed that T. putitora collected from the Kosi River in Ramnagar District of Uttarakhand spawns from July to September. The most accepted spawning seasons for T. putitora were during the monsoon season (Nautiyal, 1984a, b; Thomas, 1897), which agrees with the current findings. The comparative spawning season of T. putitora studied by other researchers is provided in Table 4. The knife-edge selection process yielded per-recruit values of 0.409, 0.314, and 0.508 at E10, E50, and Emax.
Virtual population analysis
The length at first capture (Lc = L50) of T. putitora was estimated to be 273.90 mm using the probability of capture analysis and the selection curves (Fig. 11). The results obtained from length-structured VPA are depicted in Fig. 11. The input parameters used for VPA were Lα = 987 mm, K = 0.26 yr−1, M = 0.27 yr−1, a = 0.0101, and b = 2.996 from the length-weight studies in gram and millimetre.
Fishing mortality for Tor putitora in the Tehri dam reservoir was considerably greater between length groups of 360–399 and 320–359 mm, according to the virtual population analysis. According to Bhatt et al. (2000), the age classes of T. putitora in the river Ganga that are most prevalent are those that are 2–4+ years old, and they made up about 73.0% of the species’ overall catch. According to Bhatt et al. (2004), golden mahseer was the dominant species in the Ganga River’s foothill section during 1993–1994, accounting for around 19% of the total annual catch. In addition, Tor putitora made a significant contribution to the commercial fishery in some lacustrine water bodies, including Gobindsagar reservoir, Pond reservoir, and Bhimtal (Johal et al., 1994; WWF, 2013).
Water parameters
Standard techniques were used to analyse the water quality attributes of the Tehri dam reservoir bimonthly, and the range and average data of selected parameters are shown in Table 5. During the monsoon season, there is a prevalent high-water capacity with a depth of 8.20–52.0 m. The water exhibited very high transparency and was somewhat less turbid (199.67 ± 87.86 cm). Low TDS (77.03 ± 13.12 mg/l) and conductivity (114.61 ± 23.73 S/cm) were induced by monsoon rain and dilution. The pH of the water was alkaline (8.44 ± 0.77), making it a good habitat for fish. The reservoir water’s dissolved oxygen concentration was found to be adequate (7.76 ± 0.37 mg/l). The fact that the total alkalinity was low (36.00 ± 5.31 mg/l) could be attributable to rainfall dilution.
The parameters of the Tehri dam reservoir’s water quality have been found to be suitable for fish growth, particularly for the endangered T. putitora, and it was further found that anthropogenic activities such as domestic, industrial, or agricultural discharge have no discernible impact on the reservoir’s water quality (Khadse et al., 2019). According to Khadse et al. (2019), the following water parameters were found in the Tehri dam reservoir: pH 7.3–7.7, specific conductivity 102–130 μS/cm, turbidity 3.0–6.0 NTU, TDS 61–78 mg/l, total alkalinity 38–54 mg/l, etc. While Ayoade and Agarwal (2012) studied the physical and chemical parameters of water in the Tehri dam reservoir during the post-impoundment period and certain parameters were obtained: water temperature 16.5–29.3 °C, transparency 55–158 cm, turbidity 1–12 NTU, pH 4–9.8, DO 6.9–11.75 mg/l, conductivity 59.6–93.5 mg/l, TDS 31.04–46.8 mg/l, alkalinity 40–78.2 mg/l, etc. The physicochemical parameters of the Tehri dam reservoir were reported by Agarwal and Rajwar (2010) as follows: water temperature 7.03–27.03 °C, pH 6.79–7.98, DO 6.56–8.96 mg/l, alkalinity 37.2–70.8, and so on. The current record of water parameters is within the range of previous studies in the same environment.
Conclusions
Tor putitora is a game and food fish that lives in mountainous rivers. It grows slowly and has a long-life span. Tor putitora is a widespread species that can flourish in both lentic and lotic waters. The current study evaluated the fisheries, growth, mortality, and population information of Tor putitora collected from the Tehri dam reservoir in Uttarakhand between January and December 2022. The exponent b value was reported to be 2.996 based on the length-weight relationships, indicating an isometric growth pattern of the species in the studied environment with a high r2 value of 0.999. According to the length-frequency distribution, length groups of 360–399 and 320–359 mm dominated commercial catches of T. putitora in the Tehri dam reservoir. This species’ estimated fishing mortality (0.73) is higher than its natural mortality (0.27), indicating that it is already excessively exploited, which means fishing pressure should be lowered immediately. Tor putitora can grow to 226 mm, 400 mm, 535 mm, 638 mm, 718 mm, and 780, and 827 mm at the end of the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh years, showing a moderate growth rate with a K value of 0.26 yr-1. The current study shows that T. putitora is over-exploited in the studied water bodies, with an exploitation rate of 0.73, which is substantially higher than the optimum value (0.50) for sustainable yield.
The results indicate that the growth and mortality parameters of T. putitora are nearly identical to those of other Tor species found in Indian waters. The findings of this study will be useful in determining the population parameters of an extremely commercially significant species in the Tehri dam reservoir. The information acquired from this study will be useful in assessing population dynamics as well as fishing gear selectivity. Furthermore, current research revealed that T. putitora is subjected to heavy fishing pressure, which must be reduced immediately in order to ensure a sustainable yield in the Tehri dam reservoir in the future.
Thus, protecting the imperilled and highly valuable golden mahseer in the rivers of the Himalayas is of utmost importance. It is crucial to make considerable efforts for the protection of this exquisite fish species, even though the majority of Mahseer’s important riverine habitats have been subjected to or are currently being regulated for irrigation and hydropower. Due to its ecological importance, the species has earned the nicknames “tiger of water” or “tiger of rivers,” and it has been suggested that it serve as a “flagship” species to increase awareness among the public, conservationists, and fishermen. Priority should be given to ecosystem-based conservation management for T. putitora, which involves locating and safeguarding appropriate breeding habitats as well as banning fishing during the monsoon season. Sustainable fishing may be allowed during non-monsoon months with restrictions on gear size and a fine for catching fingerlings and juvenile fish. A long-term conservation plan would be to conserve mahseer ex situ by building hatcheries.
Data availability
This article contains all the study’s data, which are also included in this article and are accessible upon proper request.
References
Abowei, J. F. N. (2010). Some population parameters of Distichodus rostratus (Gunther, 1864) from the fresh water reaches of lower Nun river, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2(2), 84–90.
Agarwal, A. K., & Rajwar, G. S. (2010). Physico-chemical and microbiological study of Tehri dam reservoir, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Journal of American Science, 6(6), 65–71.
Ali, S., Barat, A., Kumar, P., Sati, J., Kumar, R., & Haldar, R. S. (2014). Study of length–weight relationship and condition factor of the Golden mahseer, Tor putitora from Himalayan rivers of India. Journal of Environmental Biology, 35, 225–228.
Apha, A. W., Greenberg, W. I. A., Clesceri, L., & Eaton, A. (2012). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington DC American Public Health Association.
Awas, M., Ahmed, I., & Sheikh, Z. A. (2020). Length-weight relationship of six Coldwater food fish species of river Poonch, Pir Panjal Himalaya, India. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries, 24(2), 353–359. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejabf.2020.82230
Ayoade, A. A., & Agarwal, N. (2012). Preliminary analyses of physical and chemical parameters of Tehri dam reservoir, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Zoology and Ecology, 22(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/21658005.2012.674656
Banarescu, P., & Coad, B. W. (1991). Cyprinids of Eurasia. In I. J. Winfield & J. S. Nelson (Eds.), Cyprinid fishes: Systematics, biology, and exploitation. Fish and fish. Ser. 3, 667 p (pp. 127–155). Chapman and Hall.
Bashir, A., Sharma, N. K., Bisht, B. S., Singh, R., & Mir, J. I. (2015). Length-weight relationships of 10 fish species from two tributaries of Indus River Basin in Jammu and Kashmir, India. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 31, 1163–1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12844
Beverton, R. J. H., & Holt, S. J. (1957). On the dynamics of exploited fish populations, Fish. Invest Minist Agric Fish Food GB (2 Sea Fish), 19, 533.
Bhakta, D., Das, S. K., Das, B. K., Nagesh, T. S., & Behera, B. K. (2022). Fishery and population dynamics of Otolithoides pama (Hamilton, 1822) from Hooghly-Matlah estuary of West Bengal, India. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, 25(2), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.14321/aehm.025.02.36
Bhakta, D., Das, S. K., Das, B. K., Nagesh, T. S., & Samanta, R. (2020). Growth, mortality and exploitation status of Otolithoides pama (Hamilton, 1822) from Hooghly-Matlah estuary of West Bengal, India. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 39, 101451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2020.101451
Bhatnagar, G. K. (1964). Spawning and fecundity of Bhakra reservoir fishes. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 11, 485–502.
Bhatt, J. P., Nautiyal, P., & Singh, H. R. (1998). Comparative study of morphometric characters of Himalayan Mahseer, Tor putitora (Hamilton) between ganga and Gobindsagar reservoir. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 45, 85–87.
Bhatt, J. P., Nautiyal, P., & Singh, H. R. (2000). Population structure of Himalayan Mahseer, a large cyprinid fish in the regulated foothill section of the river ganga. Fisheries Research, 44, 267–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(99)00083-1
Bhatt, J. P., Nautiyal, P., & Singh, H. R. (2004). Status (1993-1994) of the endangered fish Himalayan mahseer Tor putitora (Hamilton) (Cyprinidae) in the mountain reaches of the river ganga. Asian Fisheries Science, 17, 341–355.
Bid, S. (2016). Change detection of vegetation cover by NDVI technique on catchment area of the Panchet Hill dam, India. International Journal of Research in Geography (IJRG), 2(3), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.20431/2454-8685.0203002
Bid, S., & Siddique, G. (2019a). Human risk assessment of Panchet dam in India using TOPSIS and WASPAS multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. Heliyon, 5(6), e01956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01956
Bid, S., & Siddique, G. (2019b). Identification of seasonal variation of water turbidity using NDTI method in Panchet Hill dam, India. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 5, 1179–1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00609-8
Bid, S., & Siddique, G. (2022). Water-level fluctuation (WLF) of Panchet dam in India and assessment of its human risk using AHP method. Geo Journal, 87(2), 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10266-5
Chirwatkar, B. B., Das, S. K., Bhakta, D., Nagesh, T. S., & Behera, S. (2021). Growth, mortality and stock assessment of Arius arius (Hamilton, 1822) from Hooghly-Matlah estuary, West Bengal. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences (IJMS), 50(04), 302–309. https://doi.org/10.56042/ijms.v50i04.66202
Chung, K. C., & Woo, N. Y. S. (1999). Age and growth by scale analysis of Pomacanthus imperator (Teleostei: Pomacanthidae) from Dongsha Islands, southern China. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 55, 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007571532648
Cone, R. S. (1989). The need to reconsider the use of condition indices in fishery science. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 118, 510–514.
Das, S. M., & Pathani, S. S. (1978). Studies on the biology of Kumaun Mahseer (Tor putitora). Adaptation of the alimentary tract to feeding habits and body weight. The Indian Journal of Fisheries, 48, 461–465.
Dasgupta, M. (1991a). Food and feeding habits of the mahseer, Tor putitora (Hamilton). The Indian Journal of Fisheries, 38(4), 212–217.
Dasgupta, M. (1991b). Length-weight relationship and condition factor (K-value) of Tor putitora (Hamilton) from Garo Hills, Meghalaya. The Indian Journal of Fisheries, 38(1), 35–38.
Desai VR (2003) Synopsis of biological data on the tor mahseer Tor tor (Hamilton, 1822). FAO Fisheries Synopsis. No. 158. Rome, FAO. pp. 36.
Dinesh, K., Nandeesha, M. C., Nautiyal, P., & Aiyappa, P. (2010). Mahseers in India: A review with focus on conservation. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 80(supplt 1), 26–38.
Dobriyal, A. K., Kumar, N., Bahuguna, A. K., & Singh, H. R. (2000). Breeding ecology of some cold water minor carps fromGarhwal Himalayas. In H. R. Singh & W. S. Lakra (Eds.), Coldwater fish and fisheries (p. 337). Narendra Publishing House 177–86.
Dunsford, H. S. (1911). The report on fish and fisheries of the Punjab (p. 23). Government Press.
Eschmeyer, W. N., Ferraries, Jr. C. J., Hoang, M. D., & Long, D. J. (2004). The catalogue of fishes, online, species of fishes, http://www.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/intro.html. Accessed 15 Dec 2004.
Everard, M., & Kataria, G. (2011). Recreational angling markets to advance the conservation of a reach of the Western Ramganga river, India. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 21, 101–108.
Gayanilo, F. C. Jr., Sparre, P., & Pauly, D. (1996). FAO-ICLARM Stock Assessment Tools (FiSAT) users guide, FAO Computerized Information Series (Fisheries) No.8. FAO, Rome, 3 diskettes and p. 124.
Gulland, J. A. (1983). Fish stock assessment: a manual of basic method. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley and Sons Inter-science, FAO/Wiley Series on Food and Agricultural; 1983. p. 233.
Gupta, N., Bower, S. D., Raghavan, R., Danylchuk, A. J., & Cooke, S. J. (2015). Status of recreational fisheries in India: Development, issues, and opportunities. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture, 23, 291–301.
Gupta, N., Nautiyal, P., Borgohain, A., Sivakumar, K., Mathur, V. B., & Chadwick, M. A. (2014a). Catch-and-release angling as a management tool for freshwater fish conservation in India. Oryx, 50(2), 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605314000787
Gupta, N., Sivakumar, K., Mathur, V. B., & Chadwick, M. A. (2014b). The ‘tiger of Indian rivers’: Stakeholders’ perspectives on the golden mahseer as a flagship fish species. Area, 46(4), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12124
Hilborn, R., & Walters, C. J. (1992). Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: Choice, dynamics, and uncertainty. Springer.
Hora, S. L. (1940). The game fishes of India i. the mahseers and large scaled barbels of India 2. The tor mahseer Barbus (Tor) tor (Hamilton). Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 41, 518–525.
IUCN (2015) IUCN red list of threatened species. ver. 2015.1. (http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/search). Accessed 30 Mar 2015.
IUCN (2022) IUCN red list of threatened species. ver. 2022.1. (http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/search). Accessed Dec 2020.
Johal, M. S., & Kingra, J. S.(1989). Harvestable size of golden mahseer Tor putitora (Hamilton) for its conservation In: R.D. Khulbe (Ed.), On Perspectives in Aquatic Biology. Proc. Nat. Semi. Papyrus Publishing House, New Delhi: 355–360.
Johal, M. S., & Tandon, K. K. (1981). Age, growth and length–weight relationship of Tor putitora from Gobindsagar, Himachal Pradesh India. In Fish bull, special publication on Coldwater fisheries seminar organized by CIFE (pp. 43–48). Chandigarh.
Johal, M. S., Tandon, K. K., & Sandhu, G. S. (1994). Morphometry of Tor putitora. In P. Nautiyal (Ed.), Mahseer the game fish (pp. B68–B75). Jagdamba Publication.
Johal, M. S., Tandon, K. K., & Sandhu, G. S. (1999). Age and growth of an endangered cold water fish golden mahseer Tor putitora (ham.) from Gobindsagar, Himachal Pradesh, India. In D. N. Saksena (Ed.), Recent research advances in ichthyology (pp. 59–73). Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.
Johnson, C., Sarkar, U. K., Koushlesh, S. K., Das, A. K., Das, B. K., & Naskar, B. K. (2020). Population structure of Nile tilapia and its impact on fisheries of a tropical impacted reservoir, Central India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 29091–29099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09234-w
Joshi, C. B. (1988). Mahseer fishery of some hill streams in Western Himalayas. The Indian Journal of Fisheries, 35, 327–329.
Joshi, C. B., & Raina, H. S. (1997). Impact of habitat changes on mahseer fishery in Indian uplands with special reference to Kumaon Himalayas. In K. K. Vass & M. Sinha (Eds.), Changing perspectives of inland fisheries (pp. 84–88). Inland Fisheries Society of India.
Joshi, K. D., Das, S. C. S., Pathak, R. K., Khan, A., Sarkar, U. K., & Roy, K. (2018). Pattern of reproductive biology of the endangered golden mahseer Tor putitora (Hamilton 1822) with special reference to regional climate change implications on breeding phenology from lesser Himalayan region, India. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46(1), 1289–1295.
Khadse, G. K., Meshram, D. B., Deshmukh, P., & Labhasetwar, P. K. (2019). Water quality of Tehri dam reservoir and contributing rivers in the Himalayan region, India. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 5, 1951–1961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-019-00348-9
Khan, H. (1939). Study of the sex organ of mahseer. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 41(1), 231–243.
Kishor, B., Bhatt, J. P., Rawat, V. S., Nautiyal, R., & Nautiyal, P. (1998). Variations in the food habits of the Himalayan Mahseer inhabiting the ganga river system in Garhwal region. The Indian Journal of Fisheries, 45(1), 113–118.
Lakra, W. S., Goswami, M., & Sarkar, U. K. (2010). Conservation biology of Indian mahseer. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 80, 98–108.
LeCren, E. D. (1951). The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). The Journal of Animal Ecology, 20, 201–219.
Malik, D. S. (2011). Population dynamics and conservation management of Himalayan mahseer (Tor species) in riverine aquatic ecosystem in Garhwal region of Uttarakhand (India). Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 3, 97–101.
Mazumdar, B., Nagesh, T. S., & Talwar, N. A. (2012). Growth and exploitation level of black Pomfret, Parastromateus niger (Bloch, 1795) off West Bengal coast. Fishery Technology, 49(1), 99–102.
Mir, J. I., Patiyal, R. S., & Sahoo, P. K. (2015). Length-weight relationships of 10 fish species from a Ganga River basin tributary, Uttarakhand, India. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 2015, 431–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12686
Mirza, M. R. (1976). Fish and fisheries of the northern montane and submontane regions of Pakistan. Biologia, 22, 107–120.
Mohan, M. (2000). Pre-impoundment bio-ecological characteristics of river Gaula in Kumaon Himalaya (Ph.D. thesis) (p. 207). Charan Singh University.
Mohan, M. (2011). Spawning biology of snow trout, Schizothorax richardsonii (gray) from river Gaula (Kumaon, Himalaya). Indian Journal of Fisheries, 52(4), 451–457.
Mustafa, M. G., Rajaee, A. H., Hamli, H. A., & Rahim, K. A. (2021). Biometric indices and population parameters of three polynemid fishes from Batang Lassa estuary of East Malaysia. Peer Journal, 9. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12183
Naeem, M., Salam, A., & Ishtiaq, A. (2011). Length-weight relationships of wild and farmed Tor putitora from Pakistan. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 27, 1133–1134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2010.01613.x
Nautiyal, P. (1984a). Natural history of the Garhwal Himalayan mahseer Tor putitora (Hamilton) II: Breeding biology. Proceedings: Animal Sciences, 93, 97–106.
Nautiyal, P. (1984b). Natural history of the garhwal himalayan mahseer Tor putitora. II. Breeding biology. Proceedings: Animal Sciences, 93, 97–106.
Nautiyal P (1990) Natural history of Garhwal Himalayan mahseer: growth rate and age composition in relation to fishery, feeding and breeding ecology, pp. 769–772. In: R. Hirano and I. Hanyu (eds.), Proceedings of 2nd Asian Fisheries Forum, Tokyo.
Nautiyal, P. (1994). The Himalayan or putitor mahseer Tor putitora (Hamilton). In P. Nautiyal (Ed.), Mahseer the game fish (pp. B4–B12). Jagdamba Publications.
Nautiyal, P. (2014). Review of the art and science of Indian mahseer (game fish) from nineteenth to twentieth century: Road to extinction or conservation? Proceedings-National Academy of Sciences India.
Nautiyal, P., Bhatt, J. P., Kishor, B., Rawat, V. S., Nautiyal, R., & Singh, H. R. (1997). Assessment of fish food resource in relation to the migratory habits of Tor putitora [ham.] found in the impounded sections of the river ganga between Rishikesh and Hardwar. Proceedings-National Academy of Sciences India, 67(B), 203–212.
Nautiyal, P., Dwivedi, A. C., Shivam, A., & Singh, K. R. (2007). Possibility of breeding grounds of Mahseer in the Paisuni R. (Chitrakoot Dham) its ecology, and status of Tor tor (Hamilton) in the north Vindhyan rivers. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 104(3), 355–357.
Nautiyal, P., & Lal, M. S. (1982). Recent records of Garhwal Mahseer (Tor putitora) with a note on its present status. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 79, 639–695.
Nautiyal, P., & Lal, M. S. (1984a). Preliminary observation on the migratory behavior of the Garhwal Himalayan Mahseer. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 81(I), 204–208.
Nautiyal, P., & Lal, M. S. (1984b). Preliminary observations on the migratory behavior of the Garhwal Himalayan mahseer. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 81, 204–208.
Nautiyal, P., & Lal, M. S. (1985). Food and feeding habits of Garhwal Himalayan mahseer in relation to certain abiotic factors. Matsya, 11, 31–35.
Nautiyal, P., & Lal, M. S. (1988). Natural history of the Garhwal Himalayan Mahseer Tor putitora: Racial composition. Proceedings: Animal Sciences, 58(2), 283–294.
Nautiyal, P., Rizvi, A. F., & Dhasmana, P. (2008). Life-history traits and decadal trends in the growth parameters of Golden mahseer Tor putitora (Hamilton 1822) from the Himalayan stretch of the ganga river system. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 8(1), 125–132.
Pandit, M. K., & Grumbine, R. E. (2012). Potential effects of ongoing and proposed, hydropower development on terrestrial biological diversity in the Indian Himalaya. Conservation Biology, 26, 1061–1071.
Pathak, J. K. (1991). Growth of Tor putitora (ham.) specimen caught from Sarju River (Kamaun Himalaya). Journal of Advanced Zoology, 12(1), 60–62.
Pathani, S. S. (1981). Fecundity of mahseer Tor putitora (Hamilton). Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy, 90, 253–260.
Pathani, S. S. (1983). Studies on the spawning ecology of Kumaun mahseer, Tor tor and Tor putitora. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 79, 525–530.
Pathani, S. S. (1994). Trends of mahseer, snow trout and cheetal abundance in Kumaon Himalayas. In P. V. Dehadrai, P. Das, & S. R. Verma (Eds.), Threatened fishes of India (pp. 115–181). Nature Conservators.
Pathani, S. S., & Das, S. M. (1979a). Induced spawning of mahseer Tor putitora (Hamilton) by mammalian and fish pituitary hormones injection. Science and Culture, 45, 209–210.
Pathani, S. S., & Das, S. M. (1979b). On induced spawning of mahseer Tor putitora (Hamilton) by mammalian and fish pituitary hormone injection. Science and Culture, 45, 209–211.
Pathani, S. S., & Das, S. M. (1980). A note on length–weight relationship and seasonal condition factor of mahseer Tor tor and T. Putitora (Hamilton). Journal of the Inland Fisheries Society of India, 12, 140–143.
Pauly D (1979) Theory and management of tropical multispecies stocks: A review with emphasis on the south-east Asian demersal fisheries. ICLARM Stud Rev (1): 35.
Pauly D (1980) A selection of simple methods for the assessment of tropical fish stocks. FAO Fish Circ No 729: 54.
Pauly, D. (1983). Some simple methods for the assessment of tropical fish stocks. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 234, 52.
Pauly, D., & Munro, J. L. (1984). Once more the comparison of growth in fish and invertebrates. ICLARM Fishbyte, 2, 21.
Pervaiz, K., Iqbal, Z., Mirza, M. R., Javed, M. N., Naeem, M., & Ishtiaq, A. (2012). Length-weight, length-length relationships and feeding habits of wild Indus Mahseer, Tor macrolepis, from Attock, Pakistan. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 28, 673–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2012.01953.x
Pinder, A. C., Britton, J. R., Harrison, A. J., Nautiyal, P., Bower, S. D., Cooke, S. J., & Raghavan, R. (2019). Mahseer (Tor spp.) fishes of the world: Status, challenges and opportunities for conservation. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 29, 417–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-019-09566-y
Rahman, A. A. (1989a). Freshwater fishes of Bangladesh. Zoological Society of Bangladesh.
Rahman, A. K. A. (1989b). Freshwater fishes of Bangladesh (p. 364). Zoological Society of Bangladesh. Department of Zoology, University of Dhaka.
Ricard, D., Minto, C., Jensen, O. P., & Baum, J. K. (2012). Evaluating the knowledge base and status of commercially exploited marine species with the RAM legacy stock assessment database. Fish and Fisheries, 13, 380–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00435.x
Sehgal, K. C. (1971). Fisheries survey of Himachal Pradesh and some adjacent areas with special reference to trout, mahseer and allied species. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 70, 458–474.
Sehgal, K. L. (1991). Artificial propagation of golden mahseer, Tor putitora in the Himalayas. NRCCWF Special Publication, 2, 1–16.
Sharma, N. K., Mir, J. I., Pandey, N. N., Singh, R., Bashir, A., & Akhtar, M. S. (2015). Length-weight relationships of six fish species from an Indus basin tributary in the Poonch region of Jammu and Kashmir, India. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 31(3), 585–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.12764
Singh, N. O., Joshi, C. B., & Paul, A. K. (2009). Non-linear statistical models on estimation of maximum size of Tor putitora (Hamilton) in different aquatic environments. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 56(2), 103–106.
Singh, R., & Shafiq, M. (2022). Length-weight relationship of Golden Mahseer: Tor putitora (Hamilton) from Ranjit Sagar reservoir. Journal of Inland Fisheries Society of India, 42(1), 65–67.
Singh, U., & Nautiyal, P. (2018). Assessing changes in length frequency composition of the migratory stock of putitor mahseer Tor putitora in the river Alaknanda at Srinagar, India. Journal of Aquatic Biology & Fisheries, 6, 176–179.
Sparre, P. J., & Venema, S. C. (1998). Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment part I: Manual FAO tech pap no 306/ rev 2 (p. 407). FAO.
Talwar, P. K., & Jhingran, A. G. (1991). Inland fishes (Vol. 1, p. 541). Oxford & IBH Publishing Co Pvt Ltd.
Thomas, H. S. (1897). The rod in India (3rd ed.). W. Thacker & Co.
Thompson, W. F., & Bell, F. H. (1984). Biological statistics of the Pacific halibut fishery. 2. Effect of changes in intensity upon total yield and yield per unit of gear. Reptile International Fish Community, 8, 49.
WWF. (2013). Mahseer conservation in India: Status, challenges and the way forward (pp. 1–36). Proceedings of the Workshop.
Acknowledgements
The Director of ICAR-CIFRI, Barrackpore, Kolkata, is to be thanked for giving the essential resources and supportive advice to the writers to finish the research findings. The fishermen that fish in the Tehri Dam reservoir generously shared their harvest with the authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this paper.
Code availability
“Not applicable” for that section.
Funding
The National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG), Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India funded the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Dibakar Bhakta (DB)- Data entry, analysis, and manuscript writing.
Basanta Kumar Das (BKD)- Conceptualization, and editing.
Upendra Singh (US)- Field data collection, data entry and analysis.
Archisman Ray (AR)- Data entry and analysis.
Canciyal Johnson (CJ)- Data entry and analysis.
Venkatesh Ramrao Thakur (VRT)- Manuscript editing.
Sandeep Kumar Mishra (SKM)- Field data collection.
Sushil Kumar Verma (SKV)- Field data collection.
Absar Alam (AA)- Manuscript editing.
Dharam Nath Jha (DNJ)- Manuscript editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
It is stated by the authors that they have no competing interests.
Ethical approval
The study was carried out in accordance with the ethical committee of the institute’s rules.
Consent to participate
The study’s authors received permission from them to take part.
Consent to publish
The study’s authors gave their approval for publication.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bhakta, D., Das, B.K., Singh, U. et al. Fishery, growth, mortality, and stock assessment of endangered Tor putitora from Tehri dam reservoir, Uttarakhand, Himalayan foothills of India in relation to environmental variables. Environ Monit Assess 195, 1377 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11936-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11936-w