Abstract
Soil carbon and nitrogen levels are key indicators of soil fertility and are used to assess ecological value and safeguard the environment. Previous studies have focused on the contributions of vegetation, topography, physical and chemical qualities, and meteorology to soil carbon and nitrogen change, but there has been little consideration of landscape and ecological environment types as potential driving forces. The study investigated the horizontal and vertical distribution and influencing factors of total carbon and total nitrogen in soil at 0–20 and 20–50 cm depths in the source region of the Heihe River. A total of 16 influencing factors related to soil, vegetation, landscape, and ecological environment were selected, and their individual and synergistic effects on the distributions of total carbon and total nitrogen in soil were assessed. The results show gradually decreasing average values of soil total carbon and total nitrogen from the surface layer to the bottom layer, with larger values in the southeast part of the sampling region and smaller values in the northwest. Larger values of soil total carbon and total nitrogen at sampling points are distributed in areas with higher clay and silt and lower soil bulk density, pH, and sand. For environmental factors, larger values of soil total carbon and total nitrogen are distributed in areas with higher annual rainfall, net primary productivity, vegetation index, and urban building index, and lower surface moisture, maximum patch index, boundary density, and bare soil index. Among soil factors, soil bulk density and silt are most closely associated with soil total carbon and total nitrogen. Among surface factors, vegetation index, soil erosion, and urban building index have the greatest influence on vertical distribution, and maximum patch index, surface moisture, and net primary productivity have the greatest influence on horizontal distribution. In conclusion, vegetation, landscape, and soil physical properties all have a significant impact on the distribution of soil carbon and nitrogen, suggesting better strategies to improve soil fertility.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Soil carbon and nitrogen are key parameters involving soil quality, nutrient supply, biogeochemical cycles, and global climate change (Bai et al., 2017; Galloway et al., 2008). Nitrogen content in soil is a significant factor affecting vegetation growth. Plants primarily absorb nitrogen from the soil in the form of nitrate nitrogen to synthesize essential substances (Geng et al., 2011). The soil carbon pool plays a vital role in the research on carbon cycling and carbon balance in terrestrial ecosystems (Yu et al., 2005). The soil carbon pool reflects the trend of the global carbon cycle, including carbon storage and greenhouse gas emissions (Tong, 2020). Given growing concerns about global climate change, there is significant interest in understanding the variation characteristics of soil carbon content and its influencing factors (Huang et al., 2020).
The source region of the Heihe River is in a frigid zone with an extremely fragile ecological environment and a low natural recovery ability (Diao, 2019). Most (87.5%) of the source region of the Heihe River is in Qilian County (Tian et al., 2014). This vital water supply area is part of the Qilian Mountains National Park, and changes in this region can affect the environmental quality of the Heihe River. Soil is a multi-phase complex system, and changes in soil carbon and nitrogen involve many interrelated biochemical processes, such as vegetation type, climate change, soil physical and chemical properties, and natural disasters, such as floods and soil erosion (Andriamananjara et al., 2016; Feng et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2009a, b). There have been a series of ecological construction and protection projects in this region, including the natural forest protection project, the control of waters, forests, farmland, lakes, and grassland project, and the grain for green project. Previous studies on the influencing factors of soil total carbon and nitrogen mainly focused on vegetation (Yu, 2020; Tong et al., 2022), topography (Hu et al., 2006; Wu et al., 2022; Zhai et al., 2019), physical and chemical properties (Qu, 2019; Huang et al., 2020; Diao, 2019; Bian et al., 2018), and meteorology (Han et al., 2013; Yuan et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2009a, b), but the potential contributions of the landscape and ecological environment indicators have not been explored. Additionally, few comprehensive studies have been conducted, so the main influencing factors of soil quality in this important region have not been determined.
In this study, field sampling, indoor experiments, and remote sensing data analyses are conducted to assess the total carbon and total nitrogen content in soil and physicochemical property indicators at different soil depths. The horizontal and vertical distributions of TC and TN in soil were determined at 0–20 and 20–50 cm depths. Finally, the individual and synergistic effects of multiple influencing factors on the spatial pattern of soil TC and TN for a comprehensive study of this critical region.
Overview of research area
Qilian County is in northeastern Qinghai Province and northwest Haibei Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, in the middle of the Qilian Mountains (Fig. 1). The county includes 14,000 km2 and ranges in altitude from 2646 to 5264 m, with an average of 3500 m (Tian et al., 2014). Qilian is a key ecological security barrier in China, connected to the Hexi Corridor in the north and the Qinghai Lake’s transit channel in the south. Qilian is in the “north line” of the province’s “one circle and three lines” tourism strategy layout and serves as a transportation hub and gateway to the outside world (Zhang et al., 2021). The region is considered an important “gene bank” for cold-zone species (Ma et al., 2021). The plateau continental climate region has an annual average temperature of 1 °C and annual precipitation of 420 mm (Ma et al., 2021). There are several rivers in Qilian County: the Heihe River, China’s second largest inland river; the Datong River, a Yellow River tributary; and the Tuole River, Jiayuguan, Gansu Province’s mother river. These many rivers make this region an important water source conservation area and a valuable ecological barrier in western Gansu, with irreplaceable ecological functions (Yuan, 2019).
Data sources and methods
Data sources
Soil data
The root systems of plants in the frigid grassland in the Qilian Mountains are primarily concentrated in the surface layer. Some shrub root systems start to grow vertically downward at the surface layer but switch to grow horizontally after a certain depth (Yang et al., 2007). Therefore, the nutrient pool of surface soil is the main supply of plant mineral nutrients (Yang et al., 2008). According to the stratification by physical properties of soil in the Qilian Mountains and the Three-River-Source region, Liu et al. (2021), He et al. (2006), and Yang et al. (2008) classified the soil layer at 0–20 cm as the surface soil and the soil layer at 20–50 cm as the deep soil. The woodlands on the southern slope of the Qilian Mountains are dominated by spruce and juniper; the shrubs are dominated by Potentilla fruticosa (Shrubby Cinquefoil), Dasiphora davurica, and thorns; and the grasslands are dominated by Achnatherum splendens. In the study area, grassland accounts for 54.57% of the total area, bushwood accounts for 12.07%, forest accounts for 3.31%, and wetland accounts for 9.31%. Sampling was carried out based on traffic accessibility and the need to sample different altitudes and ecosystems in the study area. For each type of plot, 20 m × 20 m quadrats were set up. In each plot, three quadrats sized 1 × 1 m were randomly arranged, and soil samples at 0–50 cm were drilled with a soil drill with a diameter of 5 cm. We carried out the sample according to the national standards (technical specification for soil environmental monitoring, HJ/T 166–2004; guidelines for the design of soil sampling procedures for soil quality, GB/T 36199–2018). The sampling time, location, vegetation coverage, and orientation were recorded. In each sample plot, holes with a diameter of 5 cm were drilled, and soil samples from 0–10, 10–20, 20–30, 30–40, and 40–50 cm soil layers were collected. After the removal of gravel and grassroots, samples were mixed and air-dried before nutrient testing. The latitude and longitude, vegetation coverage, altitude, and ecosystem type of each sampling point were recorded. A total of 705 samples from 141 sampling points were collected in August 2018, including 92 grassland samples, six woodland samples, five cultivated land samples, 21 bushwood samples, and 17 wetland samples (Fig. 2).
Image data
Landsat8 data, with a spatial resolution of 30 × 30 m, were obtained from http://www.gscloud.cn/. For the images from August 2018, Fragstats v4.2.1 was used to calculate landscape indicators. For NDVI data, vegetation remote sensing data MOD13Q1, MOD09A1, and MOD17A3HGF were selected from the NASA website (https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/). The spatial resolution was 250 × 250 m or 500 × 500 m, and the temporal resolution was 16 or 8 d. DEM data (ASTER GDEM) were sourced from the Geospatial Data Cloud Platform (http://www.gscloud.cn), with a spatial resolution of 90 × 90 m.
Research methods
Soil physicochemical property indicators and surface factors
Soil physicochemical property indicators include soil bulk density (BD), soil pH, soil clay (clay), silt (silt), and sand (sand), and were obtained from experimental data. Surface factors consist of 11 factors describing vegetation, atmosphere, landscape, and ecological environment: vegetation index (NDVI), net primary productivity (NPP), surface moisture (WET), soil salinity index (SSI), urban building index (IBI), bare soil index (BSI), boundary density (ED), maximum patch index (LPI), annual rainfall (Pre), annual mean temperature (Tem), and soil erosion (RUSLE).
Determination of soil factors
Soil data
The samples were divided into two layers (0–20 and 20–50 cm). Soil TN and TC were measured by a VaroELШ elemental analyzer (He, 2017); soil particle size was measured by a Mastersize 2000 laser particle sizer (Li, 2018); soil bulk density was measured by the cutting-ring method (He, 2017); soil pH was measured by a pH meter (Feng et al., 2011).
Calculation of ecological indicators
Soil moisture calculation (Guo et al., 2021):
Urban building index calculation:
Bare soil index calculation:
Soil salinity index calculation (Yang et al., 2021):
where ρred, ρnir1, ρblue, ρgreen, ρnir2, ρswir1, and ρswir2 represent the ground object reflectivities of the red band, near-infrared band 1, blue band, green band, near-infrared band 2, mid-infrared band 1, and mid-infrared band 2 of Landsat and MODIS satellite data, respectively.
Soil erosion calculation
The RUSLE soil loss equation was used to quantitatively evaluate the soil erosion in the study area in 2018. The calculation formula is as follows (Wei et al., 2021):
where A is the soil erosion modulus (t/(hm2·a)); R is the rainfall erosivity factor ((MJ·mm)/(hm2·a)); K is the soil erodibility factor (t·hm2·h)/(hm2·hm2); LS is the slope length and slope factor, dimensionless; C is the vegetation cover management factor, dimensionless, and value range of 0–1; the water and soil conservation measure factor P is related to the land use type, dimensionless, and the value range is 0–1. R reflects the impact of rainfall on soil erosion. The rainfall observation data of meteorological stations distributed in Qinghai Province was sorted to obtain the monthly average rainfall and annual average rainfall in the study area, and the rainfall at each station was calculated. The rainfall erosivity factor of the whole study area was obtained by random forest interpolation, and the interpolation accuracy was above 0.8.
Calculation of soil TC and TN changes
The measured soil TN and TC data were used to assess horizontal and vertical distribution characteristics. △ TC and △ TN represent the changes in soil TC and TN in different soil layers, respectively, and were calculated using the following equations (Dahai & Yuan, 2020):
where TCy, TCx, TNy, and TNx represent the carbon and nitrogen values of the soil layers at 0–20 cm (y) and 20–50 cm (x), respectively, and △TC and △TN represent the difference between soil TN and TC in the two soil layers, respectively.
Analysis methods
Correlation analysis was used in SPSS to analyze the single influencing factors of soil TC and TN, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for significance analysis. The factors were divided into quantiles of [0–20], [20–40], [40–60], [60–80], and [80–100], and then the RDA in CANOCO 5 software was used to perform synergy analysis on the influencing factors.
Results
Distribution characteristics of soil carbon and nitrogen content
Statistical analysis of soil TC and TN
As shown in Table 1, the average soil carbon and nitrogen values in the surface layer were greater than those in the deep layer, indicating that the soil carbon and nitrogen values show a decreasing trend. The coefficients of variation were all lower than 48–60%, so they belonged to medium-intensity variation. The skewness and kurtosis of soil carbon and nitrogen were both greater than 0, indicating that the kurtosis is biased towards smaller values and the distribution is relatively sharp.
Characteristics of soil TC and TN in different community types
The average values of TC and TN in soil at 0–20 cm in the study area were 86.55 and 6.7 g/kg, respectively; at 20–50 cm, the average values were 57.58 and 4.34 g/kg, respectively. TC and TN decrease from the surface layer to the deep layer. Wetlands had the highest TC and TN among different communities, followed by woodland, shrubland, grassland, and cultivated land. The average values of TC and TN were all greater than 0, 48.89%, 55.92%, and 6.46%, respectively. The TN of cultivated land was less than 0, but TN values were all greater than 0 for the other samples. The ordering of TC and TN by size in various communities was consistent with that of TC and TN (Fig. 3).
Spatial distribution characteristics of soil carbon and nitrogen
As shown in Fig. 4, the spatial differences in soil TC and TN in the whole study area were relatively significant. The high-value areas were clustered in the southeast of Qilian County, and the low-value areas were clustered in the northwest of Qilian County, and △TN exhibited the opposite trend (Fig. 5). These differences were due to the large difference in nitrogen content between the surface layer and the deep layer.
As shown in Table 2, soil TC and TN in wetland at 0–20 cm were significantly higher than in other land use types, and soil TC and TN at 0–20 cm were significantly different and were in the order from highest to lowest of wetland, woodland, shrubland, and cultivated land. The soil TC and TN at 20–50 cm in the wetland and woodland were significantly different from those of shrubs, cultivated land, and grassland, but there was no significant difference in soil TC and TN between shrubland, cultivated land, and grassland. △TC and △TN decreased from top to bottom, without any significant difference.
Analysis of correlation between soil carbon and nitrogen and soil factors and environmental factors
Analysis of correlation between soil carbon and nitrogen and soil factors
Table 3 shows the correlation coefficients of different physical and chemical properties of soil in different soil layers. The correlation coefficients of BD and clay progressively decreased from the surface layer to the deep layer, while the correlation coefficients of silt, sand, and pH increased progressively. The order of the correlation coefficients was BD > silt > clay > sand > pH. Soil TC and TN were strongly negatively correlated with BD. Clay was significantly positively correlated with TC and TN in soil at 0–20 cm but not at 20–50 cm. Silt was significantly correlated with soil TC and TN. Sand and pH were significantly negatively correlated with soil TC and TN.
Analysis of correlation between soil carbon and nitrogen and environmental factors
As shown in Table 4, TC and TN of soil at 0–20 cm were significantly correlated with WET, Pre, NPP, SSI, NDVI, BI, LPI, and ED. WET, SSI, LPI, and ED were negatively correlated with soil carbon and nitrogen, and the other factors were positively correlated with soil carbon and nitrogen. WET, LPI, and ED were more closely correlated with soil TC, and WET, Pre, and NDVI were more closely correlated with soil TN. TC and TN in soil at 20–50 cm were more correlated with Tem than in the 0–20 cm soil layer, and WET, Pre, and ED were more closely correlated with TN. There was no significant correlation of △TC with Tem, IBI, RUSLE, and ED, but the other factors showed a significant correlation. There was little correlation of △TN had no significant correlation with any factors.
Correlation between influencing factors and sorting axis
The RDA analysis of soil carbon and nitrogen from 0 to 20 cm is presented in Table 5. BD had the closest relationship with the first ranking axis, with a correlation coefficient of 0.73, and also had a close correlation with WET, LPI, ED, and silt, with all correlation coefficients above 0.4. This indicates that soil TC and TN mainly reflect the gradient changes in BD, WET, LPI, ED, and silt on the first axis. With the decrease in BD, soil carbon and nitrogen increase. The correlation between pH and NPP and the second-ranking axis was the highest, 0.17 and − 0.17, indicating that the second axis reflects the gradient change in pH and NPP with soil TC and TN. In the RDA analysis of TC and TN in soil at 20–50 cm, BD had the closest relationship with the first ranking axis, with a correlation coefficient up to − 0.66, and had a high correlation with LPI, silt, and sand, with all correlation coefficients above 0.4. This indicates that soil TC and TN primarily reflect the gradient changes in BD, LPI, silt, and sand on the first axis. Soil TC and TN increased with the decrease in BD. NDVI had the highest correlation with the second sorting axis, at 0.23, suggesting that this axis basically reflects the gradient change in NDVI with soil TC and TN.
Synergistic effects of soil physical properties and environmental factors
Synergistic effect of soil factors
According to the RDA ranking analysis (Fig. 6), all standard axes were found to be statistically significant. This figure shows the impact of soil properties on soil total carbon and nitrogen. The positions of TN and TC in the two layers of soil were close, indicating a strong positive correlation. In soil layers at 0–20 and 20–50 cm, high soil TN and TC were correlated with high clay and silt and low BD, but less sensitive to sand and pH. This is consistent with the previous analysis of the factors affecting carbon and nitrogen in the Qilian Mountains: the correlation between clay particles and soil C and N gradually decreased with the increase of soil depth, and soil BD had a significant negative correlation with soil C and N (Yu, 2020; Yuan, 2019).
Figure 7 depicts the RDA ranking of soil factor sampling points in different soil layers. This figure shows the impact of soil properties on different soil carbon and nitrogen value ranges. The high values of TC and TN in soil at 0–20 cm are generally shown on the left side of the diagram, while the low values of TC and TN in soil are shown on the right side. High soil TC and TN sampling points are found in areas with higher clay and silt and lower BD, pH, and sand. The high values of soil TC and TN sampling points appear on the right side of the diagram at 20–50 cm, and the low values of soil TC and TN appear on the left side of the diagram. High soil TC and TN sampling points are distributed in areas with higher silt and lower clay, BD, pH, and sand.
Synergistic effect of environmental factors
According to the ranking diagram of soil TC, TN, and environmental factors (Fig. 8), the high values of sampling points of TN and TC in soil at 0–20 and 20–50 cm correlate with higher Pre, NPP, NDVI and lower WET, LPI, ED, and SSI. The diagram on the right shows the RDA ranking of △TC and △TN and environmental factors, revealing that △TC and △TN are relatively close to each other and are located at positions with higher WET, LPI, ED, and SSI and lower values for other environmental factors.
As shown in Fig. 9, the spatial trends of △TC and △TN to the right were significant. This figure shows the impact of environmental factors on the range of carbon and nitrogen differences in different soils. The sampling points with high △TC and △TN were chiefly distributed in areas with higher WET, LPI, ED, and SSI, with a low correlation with the spatial position of RUSLE, IBI, and Tem.
At 0–20 cm, the soil TC and TN were significantly inclined to the left in Fig. 10. This figure shows the impact of environmental factors on different soil carbon and nitrogen value ranges. The high values of soil TC and TN at the sampling points were correlated with higher TEM, IBI, Pre, NDVI, and NPP. However, at 20–50 cm, soil TC and TN space were significantly inclined to the right, and the high values of soil TC and TN at the sampling points correlated with higher BSI, IBI, TEM, NDVI, and NPP.
Discussion
Differences in soil TC and TN distribution in different communities
Soil nutrients exhibit spatial heterogeneity due to variation in factors such as topography, climate, landscape, and human activities. In this study, the horizontal distribution of soil TC and TN exhibited obvious variations in spatial distribution, with higher values in the southeast compared to those in the northwest. This is because the southeastern zone is dominated by forest land and shrubs, and the northwestern zone is dominated by grassland and unused land. The soil samples in areas of wetlands, woodlands, and shrubs had the largest TC and TN values. These high values are explained by the soil moisture status and temperature significantly affecting the nitrogen mineralization process by altering the microbial community and activities (Wang et al., 2006). Wilson and Tiley (1998) studied soil nitrogen mineralization in wetland ecosystems and showed that soil moisture and temperature have a significant impact on the rate of soil nitrogen mineralization, with high temperature and drought promoting soil mineralization. In this study, samples were taken in August, a time with abundant rain and highest soil moisture content. There is a significant positive correlation between soil carbon and nitrogen and rainfall (Table 3), and wetland areas have the largest annual rainfall (Table 6). Therefore, wetlands have the largest soil carbon and nitrogen among the different areas tested. Forest land and shrubs are highly covered with vegetation, generally at high altitudes, with little human disturbance and well-developed root systems in the soil. Dead trees, fallen leaves, roots, and microbial activities can increase the soil’s organic carbon content (Hou et al., 2021). When the soil water content is high, the anaerobic decomposition of organic matter is inhibited, resulting in the accumulation of organic carbon (Hu et al., 2018). This can also limit the activities of soil microorganisms and inhibit the mineralization and decomposition of organic nitrogen (Bai et al., 2006; Zhao et al., 2016). The low content of carbon and nitrogen in the grassland and cultivated land soil samples may be because the cultivated land is mostly dry land. In dry areas, mineralization of the soil is promoted, impeding the accumulation of carbon. The study area is used for grazing, and the grassland can be easily disturbed and easily damaged.
There were higher TC and TN values in the 0–20 cm soil samples compared to those at 20–50 cm. This is because the surface layer contains more animal and plant residues and more humus, while the deep soil has more roots that impede the decomposition of organic carbon. The distribution of ΔTC and ΔTN is similar to that of soil TC and TN.
Based on RDA analysis from different perspectives, this study explored the contribution rates of factors. As shown in Table 7, the three most influential factors of surface layer soil at 0–20 cm are BD, pH, and clay, and the three most influential factors at 20–50 cm are BD, silt, and pH. LPI, WET, and SSI are the environmental factors that make the highest contribution to the vertical distribution of soil carbon and nitrogen. The three most influential factors for the vertical distribution are NDVI, RUSLE, and IBI, and the most influential factors for the horizontal distribution are LPI, WET, and NPP.
Influencing factors of soil TC and TN changes
For the physical and chemical properties of soil, the correlation coefficients of BD and clay decreased from the surface layer to the deep layer, and those of silt, sand, and pH increased. This may be because the surface soil has higher bulk density and a higher proportion of clay particles and is more easily disturbed by human factors, giving rise to a progressive decrease. The high values of soil TC and TN are distributed in areas with higher clay and silt and lower BD, pH, and sand. BD is negatively correlated with soil carbon and nitrogen because the soil organic matter has important effects on soil aggregates and mineral structure and composition (Zhang et al., 2022). Low soil bulk density, large pores, fine texture, and enhanced water infiltration capacity lead to reduced surface runoff and high soil water content, contributing to the accumulation of soil nutrients (Qu, 2019). Soil pH affects the capacity to fix and accumulate carbon and nitrogen by affecting the activities of soil microorganisms (Bai et al., 2003). In an alkaline environment, the activities of microorganisms are inhibited, resulting in a decrease in carbon and nitrogen content.
The correlation analysis results are consistent with the RDA analysis results. For the environmental factors, the highest values of soil TN and TC sampling points in soil layers at 0–20 cm and 20–50 cm correlate with higher Pre, NPP, NDVI, and IBI values and lower WET, LPI, ED, and BSI values. Under natural conditions, vegetation is an important source of soil organic carbon, and different vegetation types will affect the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen. Different vegetation types have different biomass and can differ in the degrees of decay of litter and residues, resulting in differences in soil input and output organic matter. Fang (2010) proposed that soil organic carbon in frigid grassland was significantly and positively correlated with precipitation, which is consistent with the results of this study. Increased precipitation contributes to plant growth and promotes the accumulation of surface biomass and the return of organic matter, thus elevating soil carbon and nitrogen content (Zhang et al., 2021). Smaller LPI indicates a higher degree of landscape fragmentation, reduced biodiversity, and soil fertility. However, as shown in Table 8, although the largest LPI in the study area occurs in grassland, the soil TC and TN contents of grassland are relatively low in this area due to the comprehensive influence of other ecological environments and physicochemical properties (Fig. 3). As a result, there is a negative correlation between the LPI and TC or TN. Lower ED correlated with a lower degree of landscape fragmentation, higher biodiversity, and higher relative soil carbon and nitrogen content. Lower BSI indicates a smaller area of bare soil and larger area of vegetation coverage, promoting the storage of soil carbon and nitrogen. The surface temperature is generally higher than the air temperature. For frigid vegetation, low temperature is suitable, and high temperature may impede the growth of vegetation. As a result, there is a negative correlation between BSI and TC or TN.
Prospects
In this study, the spatial distribution and influencing factors of soil TC and TN were analyzed. The uneven distribution of sample points and limited collection of sample points in different ecosystems due to accessibility impacted the research results. The study of influencing factors included few soil physical and chemical properties due to insufficient data for available phosphorus, available potassium, and microorganisms, but future work should investigate the contributions of these factors to more fully understand the influencing factors of soil TC and TN. Strengthening the study of soil physical and chemical properties can not only provide more specific and detailed basic data for the implementation of ecological engineering in the study area, but it can also promote the smooth development of the project and provide a theoretical foundation for future research.
Conclusions
This study determined the variation law of TC and TN contents in soil in the horizontal and vertical directions and analyzed the soil TC and TN in different types of communities. The individual and synergistic effects of soil TC and TN spatial patterns were assessed using correlation analyses and RDA ranking methods for 16 factors in four categories: soil, vegetation, landscape, and ecological environment. The results showed variation in the characteristics of soil TC and TN in the source region of Heihe River for different types of communities and at different soil depths. The soil TC and TN values were in the order of wetland > forest > shrub > grassland > arable land. The surface soil layer and deep soil layer analysis results were consistent across ecosystems. In terms of soil factors, areas with higher clay and silt and lower BD, pH, and sand have higher soil TC and TN values. The correlation analysis results match the RDA analysis results. Higher soil TN and TC values were associated with higher Pre, NPP, NDVI, and IBI values and lower WET, LPI, ED, and BSI values. Among soil factors, BD and silt are most closely correlated with TC and TN in each layer; NDVI, RUSLE, and IBI surface factors influence vertical distribution; and LPI, WET, and NPP surface factors influence horizontal distribution.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Andriamananjara, A., Hewson, J., Razalamanarivo, H., Andrisoa, R. H., & Razafimbelo, T. (2016). Landcover impacts on aboveground and, soil carbon stocks in Malagasy rainforest. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 233, 1–15.
Bai, J., Jia, J., Huang, C., Wang, Q., Wang, W., Zhang, G., Cui, B., & Liu, X. (2017). Selective uptake of nitrogen by Suaeda salsa, under drought and sand stresses and nitrogen fertilization using 15N. Ecological Engineering, 102, 542–545.
Bai, J. H., Deng, W., Zhu, Y. M., & Wang, Q. G. (2006). Spatial variability of nitrogen in soils from land/inland water ecotones. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 35(5–6), 735–749.
Bai, J. H., Deng, W., Zhu, Y. M., Luan, Z. Q., & Zhang, Y. X. (2003). Spatial distribution characteristics and ecological effects of carbon and nitrogen of soil in Huolin River catchment wetland. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 14(9), 1494–1498.
Bian, H. Q., Wang, X. M., & Mao, D. L. (2018). Spatial variability of tillage layer soil nutrients and its affecting factors in Weigan-Kuqa River delta oasis. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 31(4), 759–764.
Dahai, L., & Yuan, C. (2020). Horizontal and vertical distributions of estuarine soil total organic carbon and total nitrogen under complex land surface characteristics. Global Ecology and Conservation, 24, e01268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01268
Diao, E. L. (2019). Study on influence factors and spatial variability of soil physical and chemical properties in upper reaches of Heihe River Basin on southern slope of Qilian Mountains. Cao Guangchao. Qinghai Normal University.
Fang, J. Y., Yang, Y. H., Ma, W. H., Mohammat, A., & Shen, H. H. (2010). Ecosystem carbon stocks and their changes in China’s grasslands. Science China Life Sciences, 40(7), 566–576.
Feng, W., Guo, R. C., Gong, Q. Y., Gao, Y., & Ying-Bin, M. (2011). Research on comparison between soil physical and chemical properties both from reddening and normal needles of Pinus tabulae formis in Baotou. Northern Horticulture, 19, 139–142.
Feng, X., Fu, B., Lu, N., & Wu, B. (2013). How ecological restoration alters ecosystem services: An analysis of carbon sequestration in China’s Loess Plateau. Scientific Reports, 32846.
Galloway, J. N., Townsend, A. R., Erisman, J. W., Bekunda, M., Cai, Z., Freney, J. R., Martinelli, L. A., Seitzinger, S. P., & Sutton, M. A. (2008). Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science, 320, 889–892.
Geng, Z. C., Jiang, L., Li, S. S., Bekunda, M., Cai, Z., Freney, J. R., Martinelli, L., Seitzinger, S. P., & Sutton, M. (2011). Profile distribution of soil organic carbon and nitrogen in the middle Qilian Mountains. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 22(3), 665–672.
Guo, C., Chen, Y. B., Zheng, Z. H., Lin, M. P., & Ruan, J. E. (2021). Applicability analysis of RSEI considering spatio-temporal background : A case study of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao greater bay area. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 37(5), 23–30.
Han, Xi., & Y., Jing, Y. S., & Li G. (2013). Relationships between soil moisture variability and meteorological factors on low hill red soil slope: A redundancy analysis. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 32(9), 2368–2374.
He, L. H. (2017). Mapping soil properties in complex terrain regions: A case study of soil total carbon in Yushu City. Qinghai Normal University.
He, Z. B., Zhao, W. Z., Liu, H., & Zhong, S. U. (2006). Characteristic of Picea crassifolia forest soil organic carbon and relationship with environment factors in the Qilian Mountain. Acta Ecologica Sinict, 8, 2572–2577.
Hou, Z., Chen, W. Z., Zhang, Y., & Xiang, J. W. (2021). The vertical distribution characteristics of C and N in soil and influence factor of north Chuxiong area. Yunnan Geology, 40(4), 393–399.
Hu, C., Li, F., Xie, Y. H., & Chen, X. S. (2018). Soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry of three dominant plant communities distributed along a small-scale elevation gradient in the East Dongting Lake. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 103(1), 28–34.
Hu, Q. W., Ou, Y. H., & Liu, X. D. (2006). Distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen along the altitudinal belt in the northern slope of Qilian Mountains. Journal of Mountain Science, 24(6), 654–661.
Huang, Z. C., Zhang, X. P., Bian, F. Y., Yang, Y. Y., & Tang, Y. Q. (2020). Time variation characteristics of soil carbon content and its influencing factors in the coastal reclamation area of eastern Zhejiang Province. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 51(6), 1409–1415.
Li, Y. X. (2018). Analysis of soil physicochemical characteristics of land utilization types in the south slope of Qilian Mountains. Qinghai Normal University.
Liu, G. D., Dai, H. M., Yang, Z., Xu, J., & Zhang, Y. H. (2021). Temporal and spatial changes of soil carbon pool and its influencing factors in the Sanjiang Plain. Geoscience, 35(2), 443–454.
Ma, Y. J., Liu, D. M., Wang, Q., Jiang, G., & Zhang, M. Y. (2021). Survey on ecological protection awareness of Qilian Mountain National Park: Taking Qilian County as an example. Journal of Agronomy, 11(6), 59–62.
Qu, C. C. (2019). Fractal characteristics of soil particles and their influencing factors on different land cover types in the southern slope of Qilian Mountains. Cao Guangchao. Qinghai Normal University.
Tian, C. M., Chen, Z., & Gao, X. H. (2014). Study of evapotranspiration in Qilian Mountains based on Landsat —5 TM—A case of Qilian County Qinghai Province. Journal of Qinghai Normal University (natural Science), 30(2), 49–56.
Tong, S. (2020). Comparative study on modeling methods of total carbon and total nitrogen based on SVM and RF algorithm — Take Heihe source area as an example. Qinghai Normal University.
Tong, S., Cao, G. C., Diao, E. L., & Yan, X. (2022). Analysis of spatial heterogeneity and influencing factors of soil total carbon and nitrogen — Take the upper reaches of Heihe River on southern slope of Qilian Mountain as an example. Soils, 1–9.
Wang, G. X., Qiang, J., Cheng, G. D., & Yuan, M. L. (2002). Soil organic carbon pool of grassland soils on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and its global implication. Science of the Total Environment, 291(1–3), 207–217.
Wang, Y., Liu, J. S., Sun, Z. G., Wang, J. D., & Zhang, X. L. (2006). A review on nitrogen biogeochemistry study in wetland systems. Wetland Science, 4, 311–320. https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/shidkx200604013
Wei, J. M., Li, C. B., Wu, L., Xie, X. U., & Lu, J. N. (2021). Study on soil erosion in northwestern Sichuan and southern Gansu (NSSG) based on USLE. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 35(2), 31–37.
Wilson, E. J., & Tiley, C. (1998). Foliar up take of wet-deposited nitrogen by Norway spruce: An experiment using 15N. Amospheric Environment, 32(3), 513–518.
Wu, L. H., Kang, S. H., Che, A., & l., Yang, Q. J., Cao, G.Q. (2022). Effects of terrain on soil phenolic acids content and microbial community in Cunninghamia lanceolata forest. Journal of Mountain Science, 2, 205–219.
Yang, C. D., Long, R. J., Chen, X. R., Chang-Lin, X. U., & Wang, J. M. (2008). Characteristics of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus density in top soil under different alpine grasslands on the eastern Qilian Mountains. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 1, 1–5.
Yang, C. D., Long, R. J., Chen, X. R., Man, Y. R., & Xu, C. L. (2007). Study on microbial biomass and its correlation with the soil physical properties under the alpine grassland of the east of Qilian Mountains. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 4, 62–68.
Yang, X. H., Luo, Y. Q., Yang, H. C., Man, Y. R., Chang-Lin, X. U., & Hui, J. J. (2021). Soil salinity retrieval and spatial distribution of oasis farmland in Manasi River Basin. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 35(2), 156–161.
Yu, D. S., Shi, X. Z., & Sun, W. X. (2005). Research on soil organic carbon density and storage in China based on a 1:1 million soil database. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 16(12), 2279–2283.
Yu, M. (2020). Study on soil carbon and nitrogen storage characteristics and influencing factors in the south slope of Qilian Mountain. Qinghai Normal University.
Yuan, J. (2019). Study on the capacity and potential of soil carbon storage and soil water storage in Heihe River source area of Qilian Mountain. Qinghai Normal University.
Yuan, S. J., He, X. T., Gu, X. P., Pan, T., & Yu, F. (2018). Response of declining soil moisture on meteorological factors over Karst area of Guizhou Province Chinese. Journal of Soil Science, 49(2), 320–328.
Zhai, Z. Y., Qiu, J., Si, H. Z., Yang, X. F., & Liu, L. Q. (2019). Effects of microtopography on germination layer soil factors in Armeniaca vulgaris Lam, Daxigou. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(6), 2168–2179.
Zhang, J. H., Zhu, L. Q., Li, G. D., Zhao, F., & Qin, J. T. (2021). Spatial patterns of SOC/TN content and their significance for identifying the boundary between warm temperate and subtropical zones in China’s north-south transitional zone. Acta Geographica Sinica, 76(9), 2269–2282.
Zhang, L., Liu, Y. X., Peng, H. W., Zhang, Y. H., & Zhuang, S. Y. (2022). Spatial characteristics of bulk density and related influencing factors of Bijie tobacco-planting soil. Soils, 54(1), 145–151.
Zhang, P., Zhang, T., & Chen, L. (2009a). Vertical distribution patterns of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen and related affecting factors along northern of Qilian Mountains. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 20(3), 518–524.
Zhao, Q. Q., Bai, J. H., Liu, Q., Lu, Q., Gao, Z., & Wang, J. (2016). Spatial and seasonal variations of soil carbon and nitrogen content and stock in a tidal sand marsh with Tamarix chinensis, China. Wetlands, 36(1), 145–152.
Zhang, P., Zhang, T., & Chen, N. L. (2009b). Vertical distribution patterns of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen and related affecting factors along northern slope of Qilian Mountains. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 20(3), 518–524.
Funding
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Qinghai Province (2020-ZJ-725). Qilian Mountains eco-hydrological effects of Qinghai spruce surface layer on the southern slope (2020-ZJ-725).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Tong Shan: experiments; data curation; writing—original draft and review. Cao Guangchao: conceptualization; revision of manuscript. Zhang Zhuo: data analysis; plotting. Zhang Jinhu: revision of manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All authors have read, understood, and have complied, as applicable, with the statement on the “ethical responsibilities of authors”.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tong, S., Cao, G., Zhang, Z. et al. The spatial variation and driving factors of soil total carbon and nitrogen in the Heihe River source region. Environ Monit Assess 195, 724 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11251-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11251-4