Abstract
This paper presents the most comprehensive datasets of ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) for the UAE from 1980 to 2016. The long-term distributions of PM2.5 showed the annual average PM2.5 concentrations constantly exceeded the EPA and WHO guidelines. They varied from 77 to 49 μg/m3 with an overall average of 61.25 μg/m3. While the inter-annual variability in PM2.5 concentrations showed relatively a cyclic pattern, with successive ups and downs, it broadly exhibited an increasing trend, particularly, over the last 14 years. PM2.5 concentrations displayed a strong seasonal pattern, with greatest values observed during warm summer season, a period of high demand of electricity and dust events. The lowest values found in autumn are attributable to reduced demand of energy. Decreased atmospheric temperatures and high relative humidity coinciding with this period are likely to reduce the secondary formation of PM2.5. The spatial changes in PM2.5 concentrations exhibited gradual downward trends to the north and northeast directions. Airborne PM2.5 is prevalent in the southern and western regions, where the majority of oil and gas fields are located. PM2.5/PM10 ratio indicated that ambient aerosols are principally associated with anthropogenic sources. Peaks in PM2.5/CO ratio were frequently observed during June, July, and August, although few were concurrent with March. This indicates that secondary formation plays an important role in PM2.5 levels measured in these months, especially as the photochemical activities become relatively strong in these periods. The lowest PM2.5/CO ratios were found during September, October, and November (autumn) suggesting a considerable contribution of primary combustion emissions, especially vehicular emissions, to PM2.5 concentration. PM2.5 concentrations are positively correlated with sulfate levels. In addition to sea and dust aerosols, sulfate concentration in the coastal region is also related to fossil fuel burning from power plants, oil and gas fields, and oil industries. The population-weighted average of PM2.5 in UAE was 63.9 μg/m3, which is more than three times greater than the global population-weighted mean of 20 μg/m3.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Air quality issues in United Arab Emirates (UAE) are of growing public and environmental concerns. Over the last decades, the UAE has observed a rapid economic development, expansion in transportation sector, and a significant increase in industrial activities transforming the country into regional and global centers for commerce and industry. These changes have placed substantial burden on air quality and posed potential threat to public health. Despite significant improvements in public health, air pollution still presents a potentially environmental threat and is considered a priority health issue by the country’s national strategic plan (Al Jaberi et al. 2010; Reid et al. 2004).
Among others, elevated levels of ambient air particulate matter (PM) remain in the forefront of the UAE efforts to provide mitigation measures and ensure compliance with national ambient air quality standards. The adverse health impacts associated with exposure to PM aerosols are well documented (Goldberg et al. 2001; Analitis et al. 2006; Ostro et al. 2006;Zanobetti and Schwartz 2009; Silbajoris et al. 2011; Agay-Shay et al. 2013; Li et al. 2013; Burnett et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 2014) including reduction in life expectancy (Keuken et al. 2011; Pascal et al. 2014).
Li et al. (2010) estimated that during 2017, about 545 excess deaths in the UAE have been attributed to ambient air PM accounting for about 7% of the total deaths occurred in that year. In addition, they concluded that anthropogenic ambient air pollution, especially PM, has considerably contributed to premature deaths in the UAE.
PM can also affect ecosystems, reduce visibility, decreased photosynthesis, alter the soil physicochemical properties, and affect meteorological processes (Grantz et al. 2003; Lin et al. 2012; Von Schneidemesser et al. 2015). PM can be of natural or anthropogenic origins. Natural sources include crustal dust, biological materials, and sea spray, whereas anthropogenic PM is directly emitted into the atmosphere or formed as secondary pollutants (including sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, and organic matter) when primary air pollutants undergo chemical transformations to form fine particles (EPA 2003).
Reducing particulate matter levels in the UAE and improving ambient air quality are difficult tasks because there are many sources both inside and outside the country’s borders. In addition to sea salt aerosols, the heavy traffic volumes, combustion process, construction sites, power plants, and the ever-present desert sand (within or surrounding the country) all work simultaneously to elevate ambient PM levels.
The prevailing arid to hyper-arid climatic conditions in the UAE with high temperatures and relative humidity (> 90%) are important contributors to PM concentrations. The formation of secondary aerosols (by gas to particle conversion) is a temperature-driven process. Variations in the relative humidity can influence the hygroscopic aerosol particle, where absorption of water increases the particle size and affects its lifetime in the atmosphere (Nilsson 1994).
Airborne PM of greatest health concern is PM2.5 (with aerodynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 μm), where epidemiological studies have found association between exposure to PM2.5 and increased rates of mortality and morbidity (Samet et al. 2000; Pope III et al. 1995).
This paper presents the most comprehensive datasets of ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) for the UAE from 1980 to 2016. These datasets are used to investigate the spatiotemporal distribution and the potential sources of PM2.5. This assessment is likely to enhance our understanding of the general behavior of PM2.5 in the UAE air and unveil the long-term trends. Also, it can inform whether effective measures should be implemented to mitigate health and environmental outcomes, and ensures compliance with ambient air quality guidelines.
Methodology
Description of study area
The UAE is an arid country, with more than 80% of the country’s total area is classified as a desert. It lies between 22° 29′ and 26° 4′ north latitude and between 51° 5′ and 56° 23′ east longitude. The Tropic of Cancer passes through the southern part of UAE causing substantially higher temperatures throughout the year, particularly from June through August (Table 1). The annual average temperature in the UAE is 35 °C, where it decreases to 18 °C in December through February (winter). It receives occasional wintertime rainfall from December to February, though it may extend from November through March, during which temperatures rarely drop below 6 °C. The annual average precipitation is about 120 mm (Farahat et al. 2015) with higher rainfall and lower temperatures occurring in the northeastern part compared to the southern and western regions (Farahat 2016). The wintertime monsoon accounts for the majority of rainfall precipitation in the lower elevations of the UAE (UAE Science Plan 2004). Summer season, extending from June through August, is very hot and humid with temperatures rising to about 48 °C and humidity of greater than 90%. Winds are predominantly from the north and northwest directions, though the southerly winds are also common (Fig. 5).
Data acquisition
The number of existing air quality monitoring sites in the UAE is relatively small and often located to monitor known pollution sources or capture background air quality levels. We used satellite-derived PM2.5 estimates as they offer sources for long-term PM2.5 concentrations and can allow for temporal and spatial distribution analyses compared to limited ground-based PM2.5 observations. These datasets, obtained from MERRA-2 (the second Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications), provide daily and monthly mean PM2.5 concentrations for the period 1980 to 2016 (https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/daac-bin/FTPSubset2.pl?LOOKUPID_List=M2TMNXAER). Summary of data sources utilized is tabulated in Table 2.
MERRA-2 is a NASA atmospheric reanalysis that begins in 1980 (GMAO 2015). An overview of the MERRA-2 modeling system is found in Gelaro et al. (2017) and Randles et al. (2017). MERRA-2 uses the Goddard Earth Observing System version 5 (GEOS-5) atmospheric model and data assimilation system (DAS) (Rienecker et al. 2008; Molod et al. 2015). The dataset offers two-dimensional diagnostics of surface fluxes, single-level meteorology, vertical integrals, and land states, generated at 1 hourly, 3 hourly, daily, and monthly intervals. This paper utilizes the Dust Column Mass Density - PM2.5 (M2TMNXAER) from the single-level diagnostic tavgM_2d_rad_Nx data product averaged over a monthly interval (GMAO 2015).
Table 2 presents a summary of the key parameters of the data sources analyzed in this study. More detailed information from each of the data sources are presented in the following paragraphs.
The MERRA-2 data product and system
The MERRA-2 reanalysis is produced by the NASA Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO) using the GEOS-5.12.4 system (Bosilovich et al. 2015, 2016; http://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/reanalysis/MERRA-2). It replaces and extends the original MERRA reanalysis (Rienecker et al. 2011) and includes updates to the AGCM (Molod et al. 2012, 2015) and to the global statistical interpolation (GSI) atmospheric analysis scheme of Wu et al. (2002). In addition to the atmospheric in situ and remote sensing observations assimilated in MERRA, the MERRA-2 system also ingests observations from newer microwave sounders and hyperspectral infrared radiance instruments, as well as other new data types. One notable change is the assimilation of aerosol observations, including black and organic carbon, sulfate, and dust. The MERRA-2 meteorological observing system includes numerous additions that are detailed in McCarty et al. (2016). Bosilovich et al. (2016) presents the validation of the MERRA-2 meteorological, radiation, ozone, and cryospheric fields.
Data obtained from MERRA-2 did not require special software. The spatial distribution maps and figures were created using the software Arc GIS 9.
Results and discussion
Temporal variations
The long-term distributions of annual average concentrations of PM2.5 in UAE from 1980 to 2016 are presented in Fig. 1 and Table 3. The annual average PM2.5 concentrations constantly exceeded the EPA and WHO guidelines for ambient air quality of 35 μg/m3 (EPA 2015) and 10 μg/m3 (WHO 2005), respectively. The mean long-term concentration of ambient PM2.5 during the survey period was 61.25 μg/m3 with annual average maximum and minimum values of about 77 μg/m3 (occurring in 2008, 2009, and 2012) and 49 μg/m3 (recorded in 1989), respectively.
The annual average concentrations of PM2.5 broadly showed an overall increasing trend, particularly, over the last 14 years (Fig. 1). High economic growth rates, low energy costs (subsidized by the federal government), and a growing population number have placed the UAE among the countries with highest rates of energy consumption (Farahat 2016). The expansion in power generation industry to meet the growing demands contributes substantially to ambient PM2.5 levels. In the UAE, power plants rely primarily on natural gas, but heavy oil and diesel are occasionally used (EAD 2008). Particle emissions from natural gas-fired generating units, driven by combustion turbines, showed elevated emissions at rates of orders of magnitude higher than background particle concentrations (Brewer et al. 2016).
MERRA data is point data, where every point contains the information on the climate variables at this location. Fig. 2 shows the distribution of the 20 selected MERRA points over UAE.
In addition to the expansion in transportation sector, infrastructure development and increasing industrial activities, the climate change is likely to contribute to increased levels of ambient PM2.5, due to decreased rainfall precipitation and enhanced secondary photo-formation of PM2.5 (Racherla and Adams 2006).
The inter-annual variability in PM2.5 concentrations showed relatively a cyclic pattern, with successive ups and downs (Fig. 1 and Table 3). This is clearly demonstrated when the ambient PM2.5 levels were averaged and plotted in 5-year intervals (Fig. 3). The results showed apparent fluctuations with a repetitive increase–decrease pattern in the levels of PM2.5 and a tendency for higher PM2.5 concentrations over the course of study period, where the concentrations showed slightly continuous but unequal increases both in the lower and the higher values.
PM2.5 levels showed a remarkable monthly variability, with the greatest value found in July (89.6 μg/m3) (Fig. 4). This is coinciding with periods of the driest conditions (Table 1), high demand of electricity, and dust events. The concentrations are declining steadily from July through to a minimum in November (37.9 μg/m3), before rising again in March. A slight decrease in PM2.5 is then observed through to May before increasing considerably to approach the maximum concentrations in July. A similar pattern is likely to be recorded every year and is linked to greater emissions of both primary (related to fossil fuel burning) and secondary PM precursors.
The lowest values found in November are corresponding to the end period of autumn season with decreased atmospheric temperatures (Table 1). Lower temperatures and high relative humidity are likely to reduce the secondary formation of PM2.5 in November. Also, the decline in PM2.5 concentrations during November is probably attributable to reduced demand of energy, which marks the end of extremely hot episodes.
Seasonal fluctuations in PM2.5 are evident (Table 4). Peak in PM2.5 was observed in the hot dry summer (June–August) with an average concentration of 81.2 μg/m3. The summertime values ranged between 40.3 and 142.2 μg/m3. However, the lowest average PM2.5 was found in autumn (September–November) with a mean concentration of about 44.3 μg/m3 (varying from 129.6 to 36.9 μg/m3).
Dust storms are an important source of PM2.5 (Shen et al. 2011). van Donkelaar et al. (2010) argued that dust and sea salt components of PM2.5 account for about half the population-weighted mean PM2.5 concentrations in the Middle East, including the UAE. While summer season experiences frequent dust storms, the frequency of occurrence of dust events is higher in springtime (Basha et al. 2015). Another contributing factor to summertime PM2.5 peaks is emissions from electricity-generating power plants. Energy consumption in the UAE increases considerably during summer. Residential buildings account for about 90% of the total annual electricity consumption in the UAE, mostly in Dubai and Abu Dhabi (Dubey and Krarti 2017). Air conditioning, among others, is responsible for a large proportion of the country’s energy consumption, representing 79% of the total annual domestic electricity consumption in Abu Dhabi (Dubey and Krarti 2017). Similar consumption rates were observed for Dubai, where the increase in energy demand is likely to rise the primary emissions of ambient PM2.5 through fossil fuel burning for power generation (Hamdan et al. 2016).
In addition to increased anthropogenic emissions from fossil fuel burning (for air conditioning, power generation, industries, vehicles, etc.), the summer PM2.5 maximum may also be related to weather conditions (Table 1). It has been reported that PM concentration is influenced by various factors such as land use, population density, and meteorology condition (Xu et al. 2016). The dry and hot summer season with higher atmospheric UV radiation (Table 1) may enhance the formation of secondary PM2.5, through the photochemical reaction of precursors (VOCs and NOx), during which fine particulate matters are formed, among others (Hamdan et al. 2016).
Airborne PM2.5 concentrations decreased in the winter season (December–February), compared to summertime values, ranging between 20.8 and 119.6 μg/m3 with an average value of 55.0 μg/m3. Intermittent and low rainfall is received in wintertime with an amount totaling of about 120 mm. The occurrence of precipitation and mixing of relatively clean air mass may result in a deposition, dispersion, and dilution of PM2.5 in winter (Table 1). The decreased temperatures during winter season are likely to reduce the secondary formation of PM2.5. The industrial and domestic demand of energy for cooling is at low levels during winter, where the overall energy consumption decreases considerably with subsequent reduction in PM2.5.
In spring time, however, elevated levels of PM2.5 have been observed with values varying from 36.9 to 129.6 μg/m3 and a mean concentration of 70.9 μg/m3. Dust storm events peak during the premonsoon season (March–May) when dust aerosols are transported by southwesterly winds (Middleton 1986; Basha et al. 2015). Dust storms are originated from the Arabian Gulf and Rub’ al Khali “Empty Quarter” (which is the largest sand desert in the world, comprising most of the southern part of the Arabian Peninsula). In general, the UAE, and the majority of the Middle East region, is affected by dust storm events for almost 30% of the time during various season (Al-Taani et al. 2015; Furman 2003). They can also originate from the southeastern Iraq, where dusts are transported by the northerly and north-westerly winds (Fig. 5) towards the UAE (Ministry of Presidential Affairs 2011).
These dust clouds effect the vertical distribution of temperature and create thermal inversion, with a cooling effect at the surface and warming in the atmosphere (Basha et al. 2015). During the storm, dust particles absorb the incident solar radiation resulting in increased atmospheric temperatures at higher altitudes, where the temperature of dust cloud changes with variations in dust particle size (Vinkovic 2006). The temperature inversion is likely to trap PM2.5 near the surface and increases the PM2.5 concentrations (Liu et al. 2016).
Shen et al. (2011) observed higher mean concentration of 528.0 μg/m3 for PM2.5 during dust storms in a semi-arid area of Tongyu, China, whereas during non-dust storm periods, the value decreased to 111.7 μg/m3. Many others have reported similar observations (Chung et al. 2003; Cao et al. 2005; Shen et al. 2007).
The Arabian Peninsula hosts the largest oil reserve in the world and is a home to leading oil and petrochemical industries (Batayneh et al. 2014, 2015; Al-Taani et al. 2013), especially on the western coast of the Arabian Gulf. For example, the eastern Saudi Arabia hosts SABIC (one of the largest petrochemical industries in the world) and ARAMCO (a leading crude oil exporter with largest oil refineries). These industries are located in the north and northwest directions of the UAE and are likely to contribute substantially to ambient PM2.5 through primary emissions or secondary precursors, where airborne emissions are transported by the northerly winds towards the UAE.
In addition to local oil, petrochemical and other various industries in the UAE, the Iranian onshore oil ports with various petrochemical industries (situated on the other side, facing the eastern coast of UAE), are also potential sources of ambient PM2.5 as well.
Spatial variations
Figure 6 shows the spatial changes of annual average of PM2.5 concentrations across the UAE since 1980–2016. Airborne PM2.5 is prevalent in the southern and western UAE, where the majority of oil and gas fields are located. While the annual mean PM2.5 levels exceeded the EPA and WHO air quality standards in all emirates, the spatial distribution exhibited gradual downward trends to the north and northeast directions, reaching the minimum values in Ras Al-Khaimah. The lower levels of airborne PM2.5 observed in the far northeastern regions are related to multiple factors. Meteorological conditions of higher rainfall and lower temperatures in the northeastern part (compared to the southern and western regions; Farahat 2016), may result in deposition of PM2.5 and reduce the secondary formation processes.
Abu Dhabi is a highly populated emirate which occupies the western and southern UAE and accounts for about 85% of the country’s total area. It hosts most of oil and gas fields as well as other large industries. The population number deceases in the northeastern part, except in Dubai. Dubai is the second largest emirates in terms of population number, and a home to a variety of heavy and medium-sized industries. Higher population number in Abu Dhabi and Dubai is associated with high PM2.5 emissions (from motor vehicles and various industrial activities) (Xu et al. 2016). However, air masses traversing from north (northerly winds) (Fig. 5) tend to disperse airborne PM and may result in relatively high PM2.5 concentrations over the western and southern UAE.
The coastal regions demonstrated similar spatial patterns, with higher levels observed in the northwestern coast decreasing towards the northeastern coast, though PM2.5 averages in the northwestern coast tend to show lower values than that in the inland regions. Of significant importance is the emission from power plants. Most power plants are located on the UAE coastal area, but the dispersion effect (due to northerly winds; Fig. 5) pushes PM further south and southwest, where elevated concentrations were observed.
The plots of 5-year average levels of PM2.5 (1980–1985, 1986–1990, 1991–1995, 1996–2000, 2001–2005, 2006–2010, and 2011–2016) (Fig. 7) demonstrated similar spatial patterns across much of the UAE, though the intensity and magnitude of ambient PM2.5 emissions have been consistently rising over the survey period (Fig. 9).
Comparison of the plots indicates where and by how much concentrations have increased across the UAE from 1980 to 2016. The lowest PM2.5 concentrations were observed in Ras Al-Khaimah and the northeastern UAE. This is probably related both to lower anthropogenic emissions and favorable meteorological conditions for atmospheric dispersion and dilution.
As explained earlier, the enhanced PM2.5 pollution in the UAE is not only due to the primary emissions from local sources (such as industrial and traffic emissions) but may also be related to the regional transported contributions (Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, and Iran). In addition, the climatic conditions of high UV radiations lead to favorable atmospheric conditions for aerosols formation.
Seasonal and monthly variations
The monthly average PM2.5 concentrations for November (minimum average) and July (maximum average) were spatially plotted to examine trend variability (Fig. 8). Spatial pattern showed slight variations in PM2.5 with generally steady downward trends in the north and northeastern directions. In July, PM2.5 peaks were observed in the southeastern regions, whereas in November, the greatest concentrations were recorded in the southwestern part.
The gradual increase from south (southwest) to north suggests dispersion of PM2.5 due to wind direction (Fig. 5). Airborne PM2.5 is probably transported in July by the southward winds to reach its maximum value in the far southeastern region, whereas in November, the wind direction is slightly diverted to the west, where elevated levels of PM2.5 are accumulated in the far south-southwestern border of the UAE. It is noteworthy to mention that there are a number of oil and gas fields at the Saudi border adjacent to the UAE (western, southwestern, and southern areas) which are potentially contributing sources to PM2.5 levels in this region.
More homogenous and better ambient air quality was observed in November compared to that in July. The prevailing meteorological conditions in November (Table 1) will likely to improve the atmospheric air quality with less fine particulates. Power plants are operating at high capacities in summer (including July) to cope with increased demand of energy, especially for cooling. These power plants will probably contribute to PM2.5 emissions.
Potential sources of PM2.5
The monthly average concentrations of ambient PM10 (for daily dataset from 18 September 2014 to 15 October 2017) demonstrated higher levels during dust season, particularly in July (Fig. 9). They varied from 74.4 to 216.7 μg/m3 with a long-term monthly average value of 128.2 μg/m3.
The UAE is located in an extremely arid region with negligible rainfall (Table 1). It is surrounded by desert regions, except for the north and northwest. Its location amid desert regions makes it subject to intense and frequent dust storms, where a large fraction of the aerosols delivered to UAE is principally derived from adjacent arid lands. Also, the UAE receives long-range atmospheric dust from distant deserts (e.g., Iraq, Iran, Pakistan (Ministry of Presidential Affairs 2011)). Dust storm episodes in the UAE extend from March to July. The source of windblown dust is dependent on the wind direction, where the UAE is subject to two winds directions, the northerly winds, and the extremely hot southerly-southeasterly winds (Fig. 5 and Table 1). The northerly winds (blown over the Arabian Gulf with mild and humid air) transport relatively lower quantities of fine particles.
Basha et al. (2015) identified the prevailing sources of air masses flowing towards the UAE as Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the Arabian Gulf (40% in winter by the southwesterly winds and 71% in summer by the prevailing northerly winds), in addition to Africa (in winter) and Pakistan, Iraq, and Afghanistan (in the summer).
Fine and coarse particles come from diverse sources. The PM2.5/PM10 ratio can provide crucial information about the particle origin, formation process, and effects on human health (Speranza et al. 2014; Blanco-Becerra et al. 2015). Higher ratios of PM2.5/PM10 are attributed to anthropogenic sources, whereas smaller ratios indicate considerable contribution of coarse particles, which may be related to natural sources, e.g., dust storm (Sugimoto et al. 2016; Xu et al. 2017). PM2.5/PM10 ratio for the period 18 September 2014–15 October 2017 varied from 0.52 to 0.80 with a mean value of 0.72. These ratios indicate that ambient aerosols are probably associated with anthropogenic sources. The PM2.5/PM10 ratio remains relatively unchanged from September 2014 to December 2016, before it declined over the last year. This suggests that the relative contribution of PM2.5 from anthropogenic emissions has slightly deceased in 2017.
The monthly PM2.5/CO ratios were plotted to assess the relative significance of secondary formation to ambient PM2.5 throughout the period 1980–2016 (Fig. 10). Peaks in PM2.5/CO ratio were frequently observed during June, July, and August, though few were found in March. This suggests that secondary formation plays an important role in PM2.5 concentrations in these months, especially as the photochemical activities become relatively strong. Prolonged sunlight radiation (with abundant UV light; Table 1) associated with increasing O3 concentrations will likely to enhance photochemical formation of secondary aerosol particles, and rise PM2.5 levels (Zang and Cao 2015). Secondary organic aerosol formation is also possible, where high VOCs emissions in the UAE (Al-Taani et al. 2018) along with high temperature (Table 1) result in increasing ambient PM2.5. The plausible explanation for higher ratios in March is that the secondary PM2.5 may have been transported with air masses flowing towards the UAE.
The lowest PM2.5/CO ratios were found during September, October, and November (autumn) suggesting a considerable contribution of primary combustion emissions, especially vehicular emissions, to PM2.5 concentrations.
The average concentrations of sulfate varied annually, but their variations showed generally an increasing pattern throughout the period 1980–2016 (Fig. 1). Figure 11 shows that airborne sulfate declined slightly in the northeastern and southeastern UAE.
Sea salts are potentially important sources to ambient PM2.5 levels. It has been estimated that dust and sea salt components of PM2.5 account for about half the population-weighted mean of PM2.5 concentrations calculated for the Middle East, including the UAE (van Donkelaar et al. 2010). In addition to sea spray, ambient sulfate concentration is influenced by direct emissions of sulfur dioxide from excessive use of fossil fuel and its conversion to ammonium sulfate in the fine and ultra fine PM (Hamdan et al. 2015; Hamdan et al. 2016). Engelbrecht et al. (2009) have measured high concentrations of sulfate, partly as secondary ammonium sulfate and also as gypsum, in PM2.5 in UAE. Sulfate as secondary ammonium sulfate has been attributed to sulfur dioxide emissions from petrochemical and other industries in the Middle East region (Engelbrecht et al. 2009).
A large number of power plants, oil and gas fields, and oil industries is located in the coastal region of the UAE and may contribute to sulfate levels through photochemical transformation of sulfur. The heavily polluted air mass is often transported from Northern Arabian Gulf as oil refineries, petrochemical industries, power plants, and desalination plants (fueled with natural gas and heavy oil) are located on the Arabian Gulf coast. These are likely to affect the regional air quality, especially sulfur.
Ambient air PM2.5 concentrations are positively correlated with sulfate levels (r = 0.51), suggesting that sulfate aerosols constitute an important portion of PM2.5. This is consistent with results of van Donkelaar et al. (2010), Hamdan et al. (2016), and Engelbrecht et al. (2009). Hamdan et al. (2015) found that sulfur was the major element in ambient PM2.5 (with a weight ratio of about 75%, whereas Si composed 10% only). They also observed strong correlations between S, N, and O for the same particle aggregates, indicating the existence of ammonium sulfate. They concluded that the natural sources of PM originating from dust storms, sea salts and crustal materials, interacting with anthropogenic emissions (SO2) and (NOx) to form secondary PM2.5. The PM10 was composed of Si (40% weight ratio), Ca, Al, Mg, Cl, K, Fe, and Ti indicating natural sources of aerosols (dust storms, building and crustal materials, and sea salts) (Hamdan et al. 2015).
Population-weighted mean of PM2.5
Assessment of population-weighted exposure to PM2.5 is of vital importance to delineate vulnerable areas where the population is exposed to higher concentrations of PM2.5. Based on the long-term annual average concentrations of PM2.5 and population data, the population-weighted average of PM2.5 in the UAE is 63.9 μg/m3, which is more than three times greater than the global population-weighted mean of 20 μg/m3 (van Donkelaar et al. 2010). van Donkelaar et al. (2010) also argued that about half the population-weighted decadal mean of PM2.5 concentrations in the Middle East, including the UAE, are related to dust and sea salts of PM2.5, with increasing annual trends of about 0.38 ± 0.21 μg/m3 (1.5 ± 0.8% per year) driven by mineral dust (Chin et al. 2014).
The cumulative population distribution in UAE shows that all the population live in areas with annual average PM2.5 concentrations of higher than the WHO and EPA air quality guidelines (Fig. 12).
The UAE population is approximately 9 million, of which about 3% live in a relatively clean area with annual PM2.5 levels of 38.44 μg/m3, especially in the northeastern part. 35.6% of the UAE’s populations are exposed to the highest concentrations with an annual average of 67.8 μg/m3, where they reside in the western and southern regions. Residents of Abu Dhabi (occupying the western and southern regions of the UAE) constitute about 35.6% of the total population, and are exposed to the highest levels of PM2.5. People living in Dubai in the northern UAE, with about 31.3% of the country’s total population, are exposed to long-term ambient PM2.5 of 48.3 μg/m3. These values highlight the importance of fine particulate matter as a contributing factor to the adverse public health. It has been estimated that a 6.2% increase in mortality is expected with 10 μg/m3 increase in long-term PM2.5 exposure (Hoek et al. 2013).
Conclusions
Airborne particles are a significant health and environmental problem in the UAE. This work attempted to investigate the spatiotemporal distribution and the potential sources of PM2.5 in the UAE from 1980 to 2016. The annual average PM2.5 levels (ranging between 77 and 49 μg/m3) were in excess of the EPA and WHO guidelines for ambient PM2.5, with an increasing trend, especially, over the last 14 years. Strong seasonal trends were evident, where greatest values have been observed in summertime and the lowest during autumn. Seasonal changes of PM2.5 levels were primarily related to variations in energy demands, dust events, and weather conditions (which enhance/ reduce the secondary formation of PM2.5). Higher values of PM2.5 concentrations were found in the southern and western regions, concurrent with abundant oil and gas fields. Evaluation of PM2.5/PM10 ratio suggested that ambient aerosols are principally associated with anthropogenic sources. PM2.5/CO ratio showed higher values during summertime, indicating that secondary formation plays an important role in PM2.5 (due to stronger photochemical activities in this period). The lowest PM2.5/CO ratios found during autumn suggested a considerable contribution from primary emissions (especially vehicular emissions). PM2.5 concentrations in the UAE coastal region were linked to sea spray, fossil fuel burning from power plants, oil and gas fields, and oil industries. About 3% of the UAE populations live in a relatively clean (especially in the northeastern part), whereas 35.6% are exposed to the highest concentrations (with an annual average of 67.8 μg/m3) and are resided in the western and southern regions. These values highlight the importance of fine particulate as a contributing factor matter to the adverse public health.
References
Agay-Shay, K., Friger, M., Linn, S., Peled, A., Amitai, Y., & Peretz, C. (2013). Air pollution and congenital heart defects. Environmental Research, 124, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2013.03.005.
Al Jaberi, J., Thomsen, J., Al Hashimi, M., Al Bagham, S. H., Al Yousuf, M. H. S., & Jamil, K. M., et al. (2010). The national strategy and action plan for environmental health for the UAE, Abu Dhabi.
Al-Taani, A. A., Batayneh, A., Mogren, S., Nazzal, N., Ghrefat, H., Zaman, H., et al. (2013). Groundwater quality of coastal aquifer Systems in the Eastern Coast of the Gulf of Aqaba, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Applied Science and Agriculture, 8(6), 768–778.
Al-Taani, A. A., Rashdan, M., & Khashashneh, S. (2015). Atmospheric dry deposition of mineral dust to the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea: Rate and trace elements. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 92(1–2), 252–258.
Al-Taani, A. A., Howari, F. M., Nazzal, N., & Yousef, A. (2018). Seasonal impact to air qualities in industrial areas of the Arabian gulf region. Environmental Engineering Research, 23(2), 143–149.
Analitis, A., Katsouyanni, K., Dimakopoulou, K., Samoli, E., Nikoloulopoulos, A. K., Petasakis, Y., Touloumi, G., Schwartz, J., Anderson, H. R., Cambra, K., Forastiere, F., Zmirou, D., Vonk, J. M., Clancy, L., Kriz, B., Bobvos, J., & Pekkanen, J. (2006). Short-term effects of ambient particles on cardiovascular and respiratory mortality. Epidemiology, 17(2), 230–233.
Basha, G., Phanikumar, D. V., Kumar, K. N., Ouarda, T. B. M. J., & Marpua, P. R. (2015). Investigation of aerosol optical, physical, and radiative characteristics of a severe dust storm observed over UAE. Remote Sensing of Environment, 169, 404–417.
Batayneh, A., Elawadi, E., Zaman, H., Al-Taani, A. A., Nazzal, Y., & Ghrefat, H. (2014). Environmental assessment of the Gulf of Aqaba coastal surface waters, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Coastal Research, 30(2), 283–290.
Batayneh, A., Ghrefat, H., Zumlot, T., Elawadi, E., Mogren, S., Zaman, Z., et al. (2015). Assessing of metals and metalloids in surface sediments along the Gulf of Aqaba coast, northwestern Saudi Arabia. Journal of Coastal Research, 31(1), 163–176.
Blanco-Becerra, L. C., Gáfaro-Rojas, A. I., & Rojas-Roa, N. Y. (2015). Influence of precipitation scavenging on the PM2.5/PM10 ratio at the kennedy locality of Bogotá, Colombia. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia, 76, 58–65.
Bosilovich, M. G., Akella, S., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., & Gelaro, R., et al. (2015). MERRA-2: Initial evaluation of the climate. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center, Vol. 43, NASA Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, pp. 139.
Bosilovich, M. G., Lucchesi, R., & Suarez, M., (2016). MERRA-2: File specification. NASA GMAO Office Note 9, 75 pp.
Brewer, E., Li, Y., Finken, B., Quartucy, G., Muzio, L., Baez, A., Garibay, M., & Jung, H. S. (2016). PM2.5 and ultrafine particulate matter emissions from natural gas-fired turbine for power generation. Atmospheric Environment, 131, 141–149.
Burnett, R. T., Pope, C. A., III, Ezzati, M., Olives, C., Lim, S. S., Mehta, S., Shin, H. H., Singh, G., Hubbell, B., Brauer, M., Anderson, H. R., Smith, K. R., Balmes, J. R., Bruce, N. G., Kan, H., Laden, F., Prüss-Ustün, A., Turner, M. C., Gapstur, S. M., Diver, W. R., & Cohen, A. (2014). An integrated risk function for estimating the global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122(4), 397–403.
Cao, J. J., Lee, S. C., Zhang, X. Y., Chow, J. C., An, Z. S., Ho, K. F., et al. (2005). Characterization of Airbone carbonate over a site near Asian dust source regions during spring 2002 and its climatic and environmental significance. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, D03203. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005244.
Chin, M., Diehl, T., Tan, Q., Prospero, J. M., Kahn, R. A., Remer, L. A., Yu, H., Sayer, A. M., Bian, H., Geogdzhayev, I. V., Holben, B. N., Howell, S. G., Huebert, B. J., Hsu, N. C., Kim, D., Kucsera, T. L., Levy, R. C., Mishchenko, M. I., Pan, X., Quinn, P. K., Schuster, G. L., Streets, D. G., Strode, S. A., Torres, O., & Zhao, X. P. (2014). Multi-decadal variations of atmospheric aerosol from 1980-2009: Sources and regional trends. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14, 3657–3690.
Chung, Y. S., Kim, H. S., Dulama, J., & Harris, J. (2003). On heavy dustfall observed with explosive sandstorms in Chongwon-Chongju, Korea in 2002. Atmospheric Environment, 37, 3425–3433.
Dubey, K., & Krarti, M. (2017). Economic and environmental benefits of improving UAE building stock energy efficiency Kankana Dubey and Moncef Krarti. The king Abdullah Petroleum studies and research center, KS-2017--DP13.
EAD (Environment Agency of Abu Dhabi) (2008). Waste and pollution sources of Abu Dhabi Emirate, State of Environment, Abu Dhabi, UAE, pp. 71–91.
Engelbrecht, J. P., McDonald, E. V., Gillies, J. A., Jayanty, R. K. M., Casuccio, G., & Gertler, A. W. (2009). Characterizing mineral dusts and other aerosols from the Middle East-part 1: Ambient sampling. Inhalation Toxicology, 21(4), 297–326.
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (2015). National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants/naaqs-table.
EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2003). Guidelines for developing an air quality (ozone and PM2.5) forecasting program, EPA-456/R-03-002, pp. 1–2.
Farahat, A. (2016). Air pollution in the Arabian Peninsula (Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, and Oman): Causes, effects, and aerosol categorization. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 9, 196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2203-y.
Farahat, A., El-Askary, H., & Al-Shaibani, A. (2015). Study of aerosols characteristics and dynamics over the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia using a multi sensor approach combined with ground observations. Advances In Meteorology, Article ID 247531, 12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/247531
Furman, H. K. H. (2003). Dust storms in the Middle East: Sources of origin and their temporal characteristics. Indoor and Built Environment, 12(6), 419–426.
Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs, L., et al. (2017). The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1.
GMAO (Global Modeling and Assimilation Office). (2015). MERRA-2 tavgM_2d_aer_Nx: 2d, monthly mean, time-averaged, single-level, assimilation, aerosol diagnostics V5.12.4, Greenbelt, MD, USA, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC), Accessed: [October 2017]. https://doi.org/10.5067/FH9A0MLJPC7N.
Goldberg, M. S., Burnett, R. T., Bailar, J. C. I. I. I., Brook, J., Bonvalot, Y., Tamblyn, R., et al. (2001). The association between daily mortality and ambient air particle pollution in Montreal, Quebec. 2. Cause-specific mortality. Environmental Research, 86(1), 26–36.
Grantz, D. A., Garner, J. H. B., & Johnson, D. W. (2003). Ecological effects of particulate matter. Environment International, 29, 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00181-2.
Hamdan, N. M., Alawadhi, H., & Jisrawi, N. (2015). Elemental and chemical analysis of PM10 and PM2.5 indoor and outdoor pollutants in the UAE. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 6(8), 566–570.
Hamdan, N. M., Alawadhi, H., & Jisrawi, N. (2016). Particulate matter pollution in the United Arab Emirates: Elemental analysis and phase identification of fine particulate pollutants. Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on New Technologies (NewTech'16) Budapest, Hungary – August 18–19, 2016 Paper No. ICEPR 158. https://doi.org/10.11159/icepr16.158 ICEPR 158-1.
Hoek, G., Krishnan, R. M., Beelen, R., Peters, A., Ostro, B., Brunekreef, B., & Kaufman, J. D. (2013). Long-term air pollution exposure and cardio-respiratory mortality: A review. Environmental Health, 12(1), 43.
Keuken, M., Zandveld, P., van den Elshout, S., Janssen, N. H. H., & Hoek, G. (2011). Air quality and health impact of PM10 and EC in the city of Rotterdam, the Netherlands in 1985–2008. Atmospheric Environment, 45, 5294–5301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.06.058.
Li, Y., Gibson, J. M., Jat, P., Puggioni, G., Hasan, M., West, J. J., Vizuete, W., Sexton, K., & Serre, M. (2010). Burden of disease attributed to anthropogenic air pollution in the United Arab Emirates: Estimates based on observed air quality data. Science of the Total Environment, 408(23), 5784–5793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.017.
Li, P., Xin, J., Wang, Y., Wang, S., Shang, K., Liu, Z., Li, G., Pan, X., Wei, L., & Wang, M. (2013). Time-series analysis of mortality effects from airborne particulate matter size fractions in Beijing. Atmospheric Environment, 81, 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.004.
Lin, M., Tao, J., Chan, C. Y., Cao, J. J., Zhang, Z. S., Zhu, L. H., et al. (2012). Regression analyses between recent air quality and visibility changes in megacities at four haze regions in China. Aerosol Air Qual Res, 12, 1049–1061. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2011.11.0220.
Liu, J., Li, J., & Li, W. (2016). Temporal patterns in fine particulate matter time series in Beijing: A calendar view. Scientific Reports, 6, 32221. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32221.
McCarty, W., Coy, L., Gelaro, R., Huang, A., Merkova, D., Smith, E. B., et al. (2016). MERRA-2 input observations: Summary and assessment. NASA Tech. Rep. Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, NASA/TM-2016-104606, 46, NASA Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, pp. 64.
Middleton, N. (1986). Dust storms in the Middle East. Journal of Arid Environments, 10, 83–96.
Ministry of Presidential Affairs. (2011). Dust sources affecting the United Arab Emirates National Center of Meteorology and Seismology. UAE: Ministry of Presidential Affairs.
Molod, A., Takacs, L., Suarez, M., Bacmeister, J., Song, I.-S., & Eichmann, A. (2012). The GEOS-5 atmospheric general circulation model: Mean climate and development from MERRA to Fortuna. NASA Tech. Memo. NASA/TM-2012-104606, Vol. 28, 117 pp.
Molod, A. M., Takacs, L. L., Suarez, M. J., & Bacmeister, J. (2015). Development of the GEOS-5 atmospheric general circulation model: Evolution from MERRA to MERRA2. Geoscientific Model Development, 8, 1339–1356.
National Center of Meteorology. (2017). Climate yearly report. Ministry of Presidential Affairs. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Nilsson, B. A. (1994). Model of the relation between aerosol extinction and meteorological parameters. Atmospheric Environment, 28(5), 815–825.
Ostro, B., Broadwin, R., Green, S., Feng, W. Y., & Lipsett, M. (2006). Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in nine California counties: Results from CALFINE. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114(1), 29–33.
Pascal, M., Falq, G., Wagner, V., Chatignoux, E., Corso, M., Blanchard, M., Host, S., Pascal, L., & Larrieu, S. (2014). Short-term impacts of particulate matter (PM10, PM10–2.5, PM2.5) on mortality in nine French cities. Atmospheric Environment, 95, 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.06.030.
Pope, C. A., III, Thun, M. J., & Namboodiri, M. M. (1995). Particulate air-pollution as a predictor of mortality in a prospective-study of us adults. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 151, 669–674.
Racherla, P. N., & Adams, P. J. (2006). Sensitivity of global tropospheric ozone and fine particulate matter concentrations to climate change. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, D24103. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006939.
Randles, C. A., da Silva, A. M., Buchard, V., Colarco, P. R., Darmenov, A., Govindaraju, R., et al. (2017). The MERRA-2 aerosol reanalysis, 1980 onward. Part I: System Description and Data Assimilation Evaluation. Journal of Climate, 30, 6823–6850.
Reid, J. S., Gatebe, C., & Holben, B. N. (2004). Science Plan, United Arab Emirates unified aerosol experiment (UAE), DWRS, NASA, NRL, ONR.
Rienecker, M. M., Suarez, M. J., Todling, R., Bacmeister, J., Takacs, L., Liu, H.-C., et al. (2008). The GEOS-5 Data Assimilation System – Documentation of Versions 5.0.1 and 5.1.0. NASA GSFC Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, NASA/TM-2007-104606, Vol. 27., pp. 92.
Rienecker, M. M., Suarez, M. J., Gelaro, R., Todling, R., Bacmeister, J., Liu, E., Bosilovich, M. G., Schubert, S. D., Takacs, L., Kim, G. K., Bloom, S., Chen, J., Collins, D., Conaty, A., da Silva, A., Gu, W., Joiner, J., Koster, R. D., Lucchesi, R., Molod, A., Owens, T., Pawson, S., Pegion, P., Redder, C. R., Reichle, R., Robertson, F. R., Ruddick, A. G., Sienkiewicz, M., & Woollen, J. (2011). MERRA: NASA’s modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications. Journal of Climate, 24, 3624–3648.
Samet, J. M., Dominici, F., Curriero, F. C., Coursac, I., & Zeger, S. L. (2000). Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 US cities, 1987–1994. The New England Journal of Medicine, 343, 1742–1749.
Shen, Z. X., Cao, J. J., & Arimoto, R. (2007). Chemical composition and source characterization of spring aerosol over Horqin sand land in northeastern China. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, D14315. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007991.
Shen, Z., Wang, X., Zhang, R., Ho, K., Cao, J., & Zhang, M. (2011). Chemical composition of water soluble ions and carbonate estimation in spring aerosol at a semi-arid site of Tongyu, China. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 10, 360–368.
Silbajoris, R., Osornio-Vargas, A. R., Simmons, S. O., Reed, W., Bromberg, P. A., Dailey, L. A., & Samet, J. M. (2011). Ambient particulate matter induces interleukin-8 expression through an alternative NF-jB (nuclear factor-kappa B) mechanism in human airway epithelial cells. Environmental Health Perspectives, 119, 1379–1383. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103594.
Speranza, A., Caggiano, R., Margiotta, S., & Trippetta, S. (2014). A novel approach to comparing simultaneous size-segregated particulate matter (PM) concentration ratios by means of a dedicated triangular diagram using the agri valley pm measurements as an example. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 14, 2727–2733.
Sugimoto, N., Shimizu, A., Matsui, I. & Nishikawa, M. (2016). A method for estimating the fraction of mineral dust in particulate matter using PM2.5-to- PM10 ratios. Particuology, 28, 114–120.
UAE Science Plan. (2004). Unified aerosol experiment (UAE), prepared for DWRS, NASA, NRL, and ONR, version 1.0, September 15, 2004. Compiled and edited by Jeffrey S. Reid, Brent N. Holben, Charles Gatebe, Stuart Piketh, and Douglas L. Westphal.
van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Brauer, M., Kahn, R., Levy, R., Verduzco, C., & Villeneuve, P. J. (2010). Global estimates of ambient fine particulate matter concentrations from satellite-based aerosol optical depth: Development and application. Environmental Health Perspectives, 118, 847–855.
Vinkovic, V. (2006). Temperature inversion on the surface of externally heated optically thick multigrain dust clouds. The Astrophysical Journal, 651, 906–913.
Von Schneidemesser, E., Monks, P. S., Allan, J. D., Bruhwiler, L., Forster, P., Fowler, D., et al. (2015). Chemistry and the linkages between air quality and climate change. Chemical Reviews, 115, 3856–3897. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00089.
WHO. (2005). Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide: Global update 2005, Summary of Risk Assessment, WHO.
Wu, W. S., Purser, R. J., & Parrish, D. F. (2002). Three-dimensional variational analysis with spatially inhomogeneous covariances. Monthly Weather Review, 130(12), 2905–2916.
Xu, G., Jiao, L., Zhao, S., Yuan, M., Li, X., Han, Y., et al. (2016). Examining the impacts of land use on air quality from a spatio-temporal perspective in Wuhan, China. Atmosphere, 7, 62.
Xu, G., Jiao, L., Zhang, B., Zhao, S., Yuan, M., Gu, Y., Liu, J., & Tang, X. (2017). Spatial and temporal variability of the PM2. 5/PM10 ratio in Wuhan, Central China. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 17, 741–751.
Zanobetti, A., & Schwartz, J. (2009). The effect of fine and coarse particulate air pollution on mortality: A national analysis. Environmental Health Perspectives, 117(6), 898.
Zhang, Y. L., & Cao, F. (2015). Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in China at a city level. Scientific Reports, 5, 14884. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14884.
Zhang, L. W., Chen, X., Xue, X. D., Sun, M., Han, B., Li, C. P., Ma, J., Yu, H., Sun, Z. R., Zhao, L. J., Zhao, B. X., Liu, Y. M., Chen, J., Wang, P. P., Bai, Z. P., & Tang, N. J. (2014). Long-term exposure to high particulate matter pollution and cardiovascular mortality: A 12-year cohort study in four cities in northern China. Environment International, 62, 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2013.09.012.
Funding
This project was funded by the Research Office, Zayed University in United Arab Emirates (Project No. R 17081).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Taani, A.A., Nazzal, Y., Howari, F.M. et al. Long-term trends in ambient fine particulate matter from 1980 to 2016 in United Arab Emirates. Environ Monit Assess 191, 143 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7259-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7259-9