Abstract
Southern corn leaf blight (SCLB), caused by the pathogen Bipolaris maydis, can cause significant damage to popcorn production. However, genetic resistance in maize germplasm offers a viable strategy for disease control. This work investigated the performance of popcorn lines for SCLB resistance and their potential for producing hybrids. Thirty-five lines were evaluated in two environments using a randomized block design with four replicates. Measurements of Bipolaris incidence (BI) and severity (BS) were taken 30 days after the beginning of flowering. Grain yield (GY) and popping expansion (PE) were evaluated at grain maturity. The data were analyzed using joint analysis of variance and the Scott-Knott test at a 5% significance level. Significant variation in all four parameters were observed for BI, BS, GY and PE, and the lines were grouped accordingly. Two lines with high levels of resistance to SCLB (L623 and L624) were identified. Five lines (L509, L204, L683, L292, L70) stand out as having high potential for breeding based on their levels of both popping expansion and SCLB resistance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Popcorn (Z. mays L.) is widely consumed among Brazilians, particularly as a snack. It influences many sectors of the country’s economy and is advantageous for growers because of its profit potential (Freitas Jesus et al., 2013; Paraginski et al., 2016). Although popcorn is economically advantageous compared with other corn types, technological improvements are still necessary to increase yield and meet growing demand (Amaral Júnior et al., 2013).
Difficulties related to low yield are present in national varieties, including susceptibility to lodging, a low capacity for grain expansion, and limitations of a phytopathological nature. Research investments are therefore needed to ameliorate these problems (Arnhold, 2008; Sawazaki, 2001). Of these, phytopathological problems, especially leaf diseases, can lead to large losses. Such diseases cause leaf tissue death, reducing the active photosynthetic area and negatively impacting productivity (Nihei & Ferreira, 2012).
Among the leaf diseases, Southern corn leaf blight (SCLB), caused by the fungus Bipolaris maydis (Y. Nisikado & C. Miyake) Shoemaker [Basionym: Helminthosporium maydis Y. Nisik. & C. Miyake; Obligate synonyms: Drechslera maydis (Y. Nisik. & C. Miyake) Subram. & B.L. Jain; Taxon synonyms: Ophiobolus heterostrophus Drechsler and Cochliobolus heterostrophus (Drechsler) Drechsler], has been the target of research due to its high incidence. Crop infection in the initial stages of cultivation, along with favorable environmental conditions, can lead to yield losses of up to 70% (Huang et al., 2010; Hussain et al., 2016; Kurosawa et al., 2017).
In Brazil, there have been no reports of major epidemics caused by B. maydis, such as that observed in the United States in 1970 (Ullstrup, 1972). However, high disease severity has been found in monitored corn crops throughout the country, particularly in states with high grain production, such as Rondônia, Mato Grosso, Goiás and Tocantins (Costa et al., 2014). In corn, three physiological races of the fungus can occur, specifically the races ‘C’, ‘T’, and ‘O’. Globally, the ‘O’ race has the widest distribution, and as the popcorn crop is particularly susceptible to diseases, the spread of this pathogen in crops can reduce production.
SCLB control has been carried out by two main methods, chemical control with the use of pesticides, and genetic control using resistant hybrids (Ye et al., 2012). Genetic control is more frequently studied, since the fungus has acquired resistance to the main fungicide mode of action groups (Raid, 1991; Montesinos, 2003; Ye et al., 2012).
Genetic resistance is one of the most efficient ways to control diseases in plants. The widespread use of resistant varieties is possible in almost all crops and has a low environmental impact compared with chemical control (Camargo, 2018). The development and evaluation of genotypes with resistance to B. maydis has been reported in research groups in Brazil (Arnhold, 2008; Kurosawa et al., 2017; Santos et al., 2019; Amaral Júnior et al., 2019), and worldwide (Belcher et al., 2012; Hussain et al., 2016 Mubeen et al., 2017). However constant monitoring is necessary, as is the continuous search for new genotypes, since variability in the pathogen can result in the breakdown of genetic resistance.
To develop resistant cultivars, one of the first steps is to identify sources of resistance. Once resistance has been identified in popcorn inbred lines, it is possible to use them as parents to develop resistant hybrids from one or just a few crosses. Identification of resistant lines with good agronomic performance and their use as hybrid genitors is therefore extremely useful for popcorn cultivation. This is especially clear when dealing with the resistance to Bipolaris maydis due to the additive genetic effects associated with resistance (Hallauer et al., 2010; Kumar et al., 2016; Li et al., 2018; Santos et al., 2019).
The process of selecting the parents is one of the main stages in a plant breeding program (Oliboni et al., 2012). Several methods can be used for this selection, but diallel analysis is the most common genetic design used. However, this method can be impractical when there are many lines to be tested due to the high quantity of resultant crosses (Pena et al., 2016; de Souza Neto et al., 2015).
Other methods, such as top-cross and circulant diallel crosses, can also be used to reduce the total number of crosses (Mafra et al., 2018; Pena et al., 2016; Vivas et al., 2014). However, to obtain results with these methods, pre-breeding is a commonly practiced alternative to increase the success rate in the selection of a small number of promising parent lines. The evaluation of genotypes from different genealogies comprises a pre-breeding strategy that will ideally result in 1) identification of sources of resistance to SCLB; 2) identification of groups of lines with contrasting resistance mechanisms; and 3) identification of promising groups for the development of superior popcorn hybrids.
This research therefore aims to investigate the performance of inbred lines in stage S7, with regard to their resistance to SCLB, grain yield potential, and popping expansion.
Materials and methods
Thirty-five lines of popcorn in stage S7 (lines in the seventh generation of self-pollination) obtained from 13 different genealogies (Table 1) were evaluated for resistance to SCLB. A randomized block design with four replicates was used. The experiment was carried out at two sites. At the first evaluation site, the experiment was carried out in November 2017, in the Federal Institute of Espírito Santo (Instituto Federal do Espirito Santo) – Alegre Campus, in Alegre, in the southern region of the state of Espírito Santo, latitude 20°45′, longitude 41°27′, at an altitude of 134 m. The overall mean temperature in the region was 23.1 °C, and the average annual precipitation was 1341 mm (Lima et al., 2008). At the second evaluation site, the experiment was carried out in December 2018, at the State Technical School of Agriculture Antônio Sarlo (Colégio Estadual Agrícola Antônio Sarlo), in Campos dos Goytacazes, in the northern region of the state of Rio de Janeiro, latitude 21° 45′, longitude 41° 20′, at an altitude of 11 m. The overall mean temperature in the region was 24.4 °C, and the average annual precipitation was 1007.5 mm (INMET, 2020).
The field was prepared with harrowing and furrowing, with fertilization in the sowing furrow in both sites. Each experimental unit consisted of 30 plants arranged in three rows of 2 m in length, with 0.90 m between the rows and 0.2 m between the plants. A plant density of five plants per meter was established. Agricultural practices, such as fertilization (sowing and top-dressing), irrigation, pest, and weed control, followed standard popcorn cultivation requirements.
Each lines’ disease resistance was analyzed by estimating the incidence and severity of symptoms in each experimental unit from the five central plants. The evaluation was conducted on the thirtieth day after the start of flowering, under natural infection conditions. The incidence of Bipolaris blight in the plant (BI) was evaluated by counting the number of leaves with symptoms relative to the total number of leaves; the results were expressed as a percentage. The severity of Bipolaris blight on the leaf (SB) was evaluated visually according to the diagrammatic scale proposed by James (1971). The scale expresses disease severity between 0%, 1%, 5%, 25%, and 50% of the leaf area damaged. Disease severity was evaluated on the leaf attached to the first ear of each plant.
Besides the evaluation of incidence and severity, after harvest other agronomic traits were evaluated. Grain yield in kg.ha−1 (GY) was estimated based on the mass of all plants’ harvested grains from all plants within each experimental unit, standardized to 13% humidity. Popping expansion in mL.g−1 (PE) was obtained after popping the grains. To pop the grains, two samples of 30 g of grain were collected from each experimental unit. Each sample was stored separately in paper bags, which were then heated in a microwave oven at 1000 watts for two minutes. The resulting volume obtained was measured in a volumetric cylinder of 1000 mL. The popping expansion was calculated by dividing the expansion volume by the initial grain mass (30 g).
The data were subjected to individual analysis of variance (for each environment). When a significant difference and homogeneity of variance was verified between environments (Hartley’s F max test), a joint analysis of variance was conducted following the randomized block design model in multiple environments (Cruz et al., 2012), according to the statistical model:
Yijk is the value observed in the plot corresponding to the i-th genotype allocated in the j-th environment in the k-th block. μ is the general constant, B/Ek(j) is the effect of the k-th block in the j-th environment, Gi is the effect of the i-th genotype, Ej the effect of the j-th environment, GEij is the interactional effect between the i-th genotype with the j-th environment and eijk is the random error associated with the observation of Yijk. Anscombe and Tukey’s test for the homogeneity of variance and Shapiro-Wilk test for the normality of residuals were used to investigate the assumptions underlying the analysis. The variable BS was transformed with the Box-Cox methodology (Box & Cox, 1964) using an adaptation expressed in the following equation:
When a significant difference was found with the F-test, the Scott-Knott test for group means was applied at a p value of 0.05. Additionally, boxplots were made for the BI and BS variables, grouping the values estimated in each experimental unit of lines from the same genealogy to demonstrate the genealogy’s potential by their performance.
The following genetic parameters were estimated according to Cruz et al. (2012). CVg was obtained through the following equation:
In this expression: CVg is the coefficient of genetic variation, and ɸg is the genotype square component obtained through the following equation:
where MSG is the mean square of genotype, MSR is the mean square of error, e is the number of environments, and r the number of replicates.
The following equation was used to estimate the coefficient of genotypic determination:
The relative variation coefficient was obtained by the relation between the coefficient of genetic variation and the coefficient of experimental variation. All analyses were performed using the R software (R Core Team, 2019).
Results
The individual analyses showed differences between the lines in all variables analyzed. Homogeneity of variance between environments permitted the joint analysis of the data from the two sites. The genotype x environment interaction was significant, indicating different responses of the lines in each environment (Table 2).
It was possible to visualize each genealogy’s resistance to Southern corn leaf blight through boxplot analysis. For BI, the mean for each experimental unit varied between 16.07 and 97.14%, with an overall mean of 50.99% in environment 1 (Alegre-ES), and between 0 and 88.10%, with an overall mean of 39.23% in environment 2 (Campos dos Goytacazes-RJ). These values grouped by genealogy (Fig. 1). The populations Viçosa, Sul-americanas, SE-013, PR-023, PA-170-Roxo, PA-091, CMS-42, and Beija-flor contain more than 50% of the lines with means below the overall mean in environment 1. For environment 2, the same was observed for UENF-14, Sul-americanas, SE-013, PR-023, Para-172, CMS-42, BRS-Angela, Beija-flor (Fig. 1). Five genealogies stood out in both environments: Sul-americanas, SE-013, PR-023, CMS-42, and Beija-flor.
BS levels ranged between 0 and 8.5% in environment 1, with a mean of 0.68%, and between 0 and 5.16% in environment 2, with an overall mean of 0.27% (Fig. 2). Sul-americanas, PA-170-Roxo, and PA-091 stood out, having a lower BS level than the overall mean in both environments (Fig. 2).
The joint analysis for each variable demonstrated a significant genotype x environment interaction. Thus, the groups of lines evaluated had a different response in each environment. This is confirmed by observing the group means (Figs. 3, 4, and 5). The results of BI and BS indicate that it is possible to identify groups with contrasting resistance to Southern corn leaf blight, and similarly for GY and PE.
The estimated genetic parameters H2, CVg and CVr, were high for all variables. The values larger than 1 for the relative coefficient of variation (CVr) reflects the possibility of reaching gains with genetic breeding (Vencovsky & Barriga, 1992). Additionally, values close to 1 for H2 demonstrate greater genetic variability. This fact implies higher reliability to distinguish contrasting genotypes due to the low environmental influence perceived in the experiments, as the variance found was mainly caused by genetic factors (Table 2).
Based on the BI means, the Scott-Knott test showed that four groups could be distinguished in both environments (Fig. 3). Lines L623, L624 and L55 (mean of 28.40%) had lower incidences in environment 1, while L623, L624, L262, L263, L265 and L270 (mean of 14.40%) had lower incidences in environment 2 (Fig. 3).
Comparing the two environments, line L693 was present in the group with the highest incidence, while L624 and L623 were in the group with the lowest incidence. The correlation between environments for BI was 0.65.
For BS, the clustering of means by the Scott-Knott test resulted in four groups for each environment (Fig. 4). In environment 1, lines L685, L624 and L623 showed lower disease severity (average of 0.48%), whereas in environment 2 (Fig. 4), lines P4, L624, L623, L270, L265, and L204 had the lowest severity (mean of 0.013%). Lines L693 and L51 had higher severity in both environments, and L624 and L623 had lower severity. The correlation between environments for BS was 0.62.
For both traits, the clustering of means by the Scott-Knott statistical test separated the 35 lines into five groups for GY and seven groups for PE respectively in environment 1. The minimum and maximum values observed were of 176.85 kg.ha−1 and 3933.69 kg.ha−1 with a mean of 1395.76 kg.ha−1 for GY, and 4 ml.g−1 and 33 ml.g−1 with a mean of 15 ml.g−1 for PE, respectively (Fig. 5 a).
Six lines had the highest PE: L294, L688, L71, L689, L204 and L686 (mean of 23.86 ml.g−1). For GY, only line L261 had a high average value. Line P3 had the second highest grain yield. The lines with the greatest potential for SCLB resistance are those in the two groups with low BI and BS in each environment (Figs. 3 and 4). Three of these lines were present in the group with the highest PE performance; they are L688, L689 and L204 (mean of 24.5 ml.g−1 for PE; 48.2 for BI and 0.27 for BS). Seven lines were in the group with the second highest PE: L685, L509, L76, L683, L55, L292 and L70 (mean of 24.5 ml.g−1 for PE; 48.2 for BI and 0.27 for BS) (Fig. 5 a). None of the lines with the potential for resistance were present in the GY group wth the highest value (Fig. 5 a).
In Environment 2, the 35 lines were classified in four groups for PE and five groups for GY by the Scott-Knott statistic test. The minimum and maximum values were 34.46 kg.ha−1 and 2863.93 kg.ha−1 with an average of 627.85 kg.ha−1 for GY, and 5 ml.g−1 and 26 ml.g−1 with a mean value of 15 ml.g−1 for PE, respectively (Fig. 5 b). The lines with the highest PE were L689, L70, L71, L509, L688, L292, L683, and L204 (mean of 23.11 g.mL-1). For GY, only the P4 line formed the group with the highest grain yield. The groups with the lowest GY included the highest number of genotypes. Thirteen lines of the total with resistance potential were in both groups with high PE potential. The lines L204, L292, L509, L683, and L70 (mean 22.7 ml.g−1 for PE; 29.4 for BI and 0.06 for BS) were in the group with the highest PE value, and the lines L263, L270, P3, L691, L266, P4, L477, and P2 (mean 18 ml.g−1 for PE; 26.6 for BI and 0.05 for BS) had in the second highest PE value(Fig. 5 b).
Discussion
Based on the results, it was possible to identify lines that are possible candidate sources of resistance for Southern corn leaf blight. It was also possible to identify lines with higher and lower levels of resistance. This identification may help future research in plant breeding, such as genetic inheritance studies and a pre-selection of promising genotypes for hybrids development.
In all variables with significant F-test effects, distinct groups were observed when comparing group means. This indicated variability between the lines for BI, BS, PE and GY (Table 2), allowing the selection of desirable lines. The different responses between the lines for BI and BS likely reflect genetic variability in resistance. The high values also reinforce the genetic response for CVg and H2 as does the value above one for CVr, which expresses higher variation due to genetic effects (Vencovsky, 1987).
Genetic variability for SCLB and other leaf diseases has also been detected in popcorn germplasm (Arnhold, 2008), most recently in a group of lines of the germplasm bank of the State University of Northern Rio de Janeiro (Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense – UENF) (Amaral Júnior et al., 2019; Kurosawa et al., 2018). It is worth noting that some of the lines evaluated in this research were obtained from populations evaluated and identified with resistance to Southern corn leaf blight by Kurosawa et al. (2018). Additionally, in this research, the lines were evaluated in two distinct geographic regions, a different approach from previous studies.
The natural occurrence level of the disease in both of the two environments did not affect the detection of promising material, because SCLB was observed in all treatments, indicating its occurrence in all experimental areas. Also, research carried out by Kurosawa et al. (2018), Santos et al. (2019) and Amaral Júnior et al. (2019) has previously demonstrated the natural occurrence of SCLB in these experimental areas.
Srivastava et al. (2017) stated that screening sources of resistance could be done with a high number of genotypes in field conditions with a disease’s natural occurrence. Following this procedure should eliminate more susceptible material and uncover the small number of genotypes with high resistance potential.
Considering both environments, the following lines were in the two groups with higher resistance: P4, P2; L70; L685; L683; L624; L623; L509; L477; L363; L292; L270; L265; L263; L262; and L204. These 16 lines represented 45.72% of the total evaluated.
Considering the results, we highlight lines L624 and L623 which have high potential as gene donors for resistance to Southern corn leaf blight. These lines descend from the population PA – 091, formed from advanced generations of a commercial North-American hybrid. Since it originated in commercial material, it is believed that these lines may have inherited genetic resistance to Southern corn leaf blight, as this disease occurs yearly in corn crops of North America (Bruns, 2017).
The remaining lines selected with resistance potential were from: Sul Americanas (P4); CMS-42 (P2), a population that was selected for its resistance to leaf diseases (Pacheco et al., 1998); BRS-Angela (L70), an enhanced and registered variety selected for resistance to leaf diseases (Pacheco et al., 2005); UENF-14 (L685 and L683), an enhanced and registered variety submitted to recurrent selection cycles (Amaral Júnior et al., 2013); PA-170-Roxo (L509); SE013 (L447); PR-023 (L363); URUG-298 (L292); PARA-172 (L270, L265, L263, L262, and L204). This last genealogy was identified by Kurosawa et al. (2018) for its resistance to B. maydis. More recently, Saluci et al. (2020) also showed its resistance in a group of partially endogamic lines from this genealogy. Finally, the genealogy IAC-125 (L204) is a population obtained from the commercial hybrid IAC-125.
Studies identifying resistance genes in corn generally use material from germplasm banks. For instance, some studies aiming to identify resistant sources to canker on corn culm (Nicoli et al., 2016), Southern corn rust (Kurosawa et al., 2016), white spot, and Southern corn rust (Teixeira et al., 2017), ear rot (Kurosawa et al., 2017), Southern and turcicum leaf blights (Kurosawa et al., 2018) use such germplasm bank material.
The results show contrasting levels of disease in the lines L624 and L623 (Resistant) and L693 (Susceptible). From our findings, we suggest the crosses L624 x L693 and L623 x L693 for future research there crosses can also be used as positive and negative controls for disease occurrence in experimental sites. This permits a better characterization and evaluation of genotypes regarding disease occurrence.
Among the most important agronomic traits for the popcorn crop are GY and PE. Other important traits such as plant height, ear height, ear weight, and 100-grain weight are positively related to GY and thus can be selected indirectly (Nardino et al., 2016). A major complexity when selecting genotypes for breeding is the negative correlation between GY and PE (Cabral et al., 2016; Nardino et al., 2016).
Figure 5 presents the cartesian coordinates of each line for each environment concerning GY and PE. In these graphs, we see that some genotypes in the group with a high PE were also present in the group with high resistance to Southern corn leaf blight. Based on Fig. 5, we indicate 18 lines as the most promising for combining PE and resistance: L204 (IAC 125); L263, L266, L270, L292 (PARA 172); L477 (SE 013); L509 (PA-170-Roxo); L55 (Beija-flor); L691, L683, L688, L689, L685 (UENF-14); L76 (Viçosa); L70 (BRS-Angela); P2, P3 (Compound CMS-42), and P4 (Raças Sul Americanas). This group contains representatives from ten of the studied genealogies. The performance of its lines can be traced to the history of their genealogies. For instance, IAC 125, Beija-flor, UENF-14, Viçosa, BRS-Angela, Compound CMS-42, and Sul Americanas are genealogies with a history of selection and enhancement (Amaral Júnior et al., 2013; Miranda et al., 2003; Pacheco et al., 1998; Pacheco et al., 2005). Such history influences the high number of favorable genes for the main traits of popcorn cultivation, which leads to a good performance of these lines in our research.
Within this group, we identify a group composed of five lines, all with a desirable phenotype in both environments, lines L509, L204, L683, L292, and L70. This group of genotypes contains lines with good performance for PE as well as resistance, that are distributed in different groups of GY.
Popping expansion has a predominantly additive genetic control (Dofing et al., 1991; Pereira & Amaral Júnior, 2001). Thus, it is in the interest of breeders to test crosses for this trait. Some studies have demonstrated that the hybrid resistance performance depends on progenitor lines’ resistance. The results of Kumar et al. (2016) suggest that hybrids from crosses of lines that are susceptible to Southern corn leaf blight are also susceptible. Crosses with lines that contrast in their resistance are usually moderately resistant. These results are associated with predominantly additive effects in the genetic control of resistance to Southern corn leaf blight (Kumar et al., 2016; Li et al., 2018; Santos et al., 2019). Conversely, GY normally presents high gain in crosses due to heterosis (Barreto et al., 2012; Pereira & Amaral Júnior, 2001).
Conclusions
In this study we demonstrated that pre-selection of lines from different genealogies made it possible to identify L623 and L624 as a promising source of resistance to SCLB. Lines L623 and L624 (R) and L693 (S) were identified as contrasting in terms of their reaction to SCLB, and could be used in studies exploring the inheritance of SCLB resistance. Lines L509, L204, L683, L292 and L70 formed a group with greater potential to obtain hybrids, having superior performance for both popping expansion and resistance to SCLB.
References
Amaral Júnior, A. T., Gonçalves, L. S. A., Freitas Júnior, S. P., Candido, L. S., Vittorazzi, C., Pena, G. F., Ribeiro, R. M., Silva, T. R. C., Pereira, M. G., Scapim, C. A., Viana, A. P., & Carvalho, G. F. (2013). UENF-14: A new popcorn cultivar. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 13, 218–220. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-70332013000300013
Amaral Júnior, A. T., Poltronieri, T. P. S., Santos, P. H. D., Vivas, M., Gerhardt, I. F. S., Carvalho, B., & M., F., Silva, C., & Silveira, S. F. (2019). Reaction of popcorn lines (s7) cultivated in distinct phosphorus levels to Bipolaris maydis infection. Summa Phytopathologica, 45(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-5405/176851
Arnhold, E. (2008). Seleção para resistência a doenças foliares em famílias S1 de milho pipoca. Revista Ceres, 55, 89–93 http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=305226700004
Barreto, R. R., Scapim, C. A., Amaral Júnior, A. T., Rodovalho, M. A., Vieira, R. A., & Schuelter, A. R. (2012). Avaliação da capacidade de combinação de famílias S2 de milho-pipoca por meio de diferentes testadores. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 33(3), 873–890. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n3p873
Belcher, A. R., Zwonitzer, J. C., Cruz, J. S., Krakowsky, M. D., Chung, C., Nelson, R., Arellano, C. & Balint-Kurti, P. J. (2012). Analysis of quantitative disease resistance to southern leaf blight and of multiple disease resistance in maize, using near-isogenic lines. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 124, 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-011-1718-1
Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Society, 26, 211–252 http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0035-9246%281964%2926%3A2%3C211%3AAAOT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-6
Bruns, H. A. (2017). Southern corn leaf blight: A story worth retelling. Agronomy Journal, 109(4), 1218–1224. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.01.0006
Cabral, P. D. S., Amaral Júnior, A. T., Feitas, I. L. J., Ribeiro, R. M., & Silva, T. R. C. (2016). Relação de causa e efeito de caracteres quantitativos sobre a capacidade de expansão do grão em milho-pipoca. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 47(1), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20160013
Camargo, L. E. A. (2018). Controle genético. In L. Amorim, J. A. M. Rezende, & A. Bergamin Filho (Eds.), manual de Fitopatologia (5ª ed., 573p).
Costa, R. V., da, Silva, D. D. & da, Cota, L. V. (2014). Mancha de bipolaris do milho. Sete Lagoas: Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. (Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. Circular Técnica, 207). http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/handle/doc/1012083
Cruz, C. D., Regazzi, A. J., & Carneiro, P. C. S. (2012). Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. 4.ed. 514p.
de Souza Neto, I. L., Pinto, R. J. B., Scapim, C. A., Jobim, C. C., Figueiredo, A. S. T., & Bignotto, L. S. (2015). Análise dialélica e depressão endogâmica de híbridos forrageiros de milho para características agronômicas e de qualidade bromatológica. Bragantia, 74(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.0315
Dofing, S. M., D'Croz-Mason, N., & Thomas-Compton, M. A. (1991). Inheritance of expansion volume and yield in two popcorn x dent corn crosses. Crop Science, 31, 715–718. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100030035x
Freitas Jesus, I. L., Amaral Junior, A. T., Viana, A. P., Pena, G. F., Cabral, P. S., Vittorazzi, C., & Silva, T. R. C. (2013). Ganho genético avaliado com índices de seleção e com REML/Blup em milho pipoca. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 48, 1464–1471. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2013001100007
Hallauer, A. R., & Carena, M. J. Miranda Filho, J. B. (2010). Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Springer.
Huang, C. J., Yang, K. H., Liu, Y. H., Lin, Y. J., & Chen, C. Y. (2010). Suppression of southern corn leaf blight by a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus cereus C1L. Annals Applied Biology, 157, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2010.00408.x
Hussain, H., Raziq, F., Khan, I., Shah, B., Altaf, M., Attaullah, Ullah, W., Naeem, A., Adnan, M., Junaid, K., Shah, S. R. A., & Iqbal, M. (2016). Effect of Bipolaris maydis (Y. Nisik & C. Miyake) shoemaker at various growth stages of different maize cultivars. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 4, 439–444.
INMET (2020). Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia. Normais climatolόgicas – Período de 1981–2010. Disponível em: https://portal.inmet.gov.br/normais
James, W. C. (1971). A manual of assessment keys for plant diseases. The American Phytopathologycal Society, 1458, 66p.
Kumar, B., Hooda, K. S., Gogoi, R., Kumar, V., Kumar, S., Abhishek, A., Bhati, P., Sekhar, J. C., Yathish, K. R., Singh, V., Das, A., Mukri, G., Varghese, E., Kaur, H., Malik, V., & Yadav, O. P. (2016). Inheritance study and stable sources of maydis leaf blight (Cochliobolus heterostrophus) resistance in tropical maize germplasm. Cereal Research Communications, 44(3), 424–434. https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.44.2016.004
Kurosawa, R. N. F., Vivas, M., Júnior, A. T. A., Santos, A., Mafra, G. S., Guimarães, A. G., & Schwantes, I. A. (2016). Reaction of popcorn germplasm to polysora rust under field conditions and natural inoculation. Tropical Plant Pathology, 41, 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-016-0112-6
Kurosawa, R. N. F., Amaral Junior, A. T., Vivas, J. M. S., Guimarães, A. G., Miranda, S. B., Dias, V. M., & Scapim, C. A. (2017). Potential of popcorn germplasm as a source of resistance to ear rot. Bragantia, 76(3), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.178
Kurosawa, R. N. F., Vivas, M., Amaral Junior, A. T., Ribeiro, R. M., Miranda, S. B., Pena, G. F., Leite, J. T., & Mora, F. (2018). Popcorn germplasm resistance to fungal diseases caused by Exserohilum turcicum and Bipolaris maydis. Bragantia. 77(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.2017035
Li, Y. X., Chen, L., Li, C., Bradbury, P. J., Shi, Y. S., Song, Y., Zhang, D., Zhang, Z., Buckler, E. S., Li, Y., & Wang, T. (2018). Increased experimental conditions and marker densities identified more genetic loci associated with southern and northern leaf blight resistance in maize. Scientific Reports, 8(6848), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25304-z
Lima, J. S. S., Silva, S. A., Oliveira, R. B., Cecílio, R. A., & Xavier, A. C. (2008). Variabilidade temporal da precipitação mensal em Alegre-ES. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 39(2), 327–332.
Mafra, G. S., Amaral Júnior, A. T., do Vivas, M., Santos, J. S., Silva, F. H. L., Guimarães, A. G., & Pena, G. F. (2018). The combining ability of popcorn S7 lines for Puccinia polysora resistance purposes. Bragantia, 77(4), 519–526. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.2017249
Miranda, G. V., Coimbra, R. R., Godoy, C. L., Souza, L. V., Guimarães, L. J. M., & Melo, A. V. (2003). Potencial de melhoramento e divergência genética de cultivares de milho pipoca. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 38, 681–688. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2003000600003
Montesinos, E. (2003). Development, registration and commercialization of microbial pesticides for plant protection. International Microbiology, 6, 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-003-0144-x
Mubeen, S., Rafique, M., Munis, M. F. H. & Chaudhary, H. J. (2017). Study of southern corn leaf blight (SCLB) on maize genotypes and its effect on yield. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 16, 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2015.06.006
Nardino, M., Baretta, D., Carvalho, I. R., Follmann, D. N., Konflanz, V. A., Souza, V. Q., Oliveira, A. C., & Maia, L. C. (2016). Correlações fenotípica, genética e de ambiente entre caracteres de milho híbrido da região sul do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Biometria, 34(3), 379–394.
Nicoli, A., Zambolim, L., Costa, R. V., Guimarães, L. J. M., Lanza, F. E., Silva, D. D., & Cota, L. V. (2016). Identification of sources of resistance to anthracnose stalk rot in maize. Ciência Rural, 46(11), 1885–1890. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20151052
Nihei, T. H., & Ferreira, J. M. (2012). Análise dialélica de linhagens de milho com ênfase na resistência a doenças foliares. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 47(3), 369–377.
Oliboni, R., Faria, M. V., Neumann, M., Battistelli, G. M., Tegoni, R. G., & Resende, J. T. V. (2012). Genetic divergence among maize hybrids and correlations with heterosis and combining ability. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy, 34(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-86212012000100006
Pacheco, C. A. P., Gama, E. E. G., Guimarães, P. E. O., Santos, M. X., & Ferreira, A. S. (1998). Estimativas de parâmetros genéticos nas populações CMS-42 e CMS-43 de milho pipoca. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 33, 1995–2001.
Pacheco, C. A. P., Gama, E. E. G., Parentoni, S. N., Santos, M. X., & Guimarães, P. E. O. (2005). Avanços no processo seletivo da variedade de milho pipoca BRS Ângela. Revista Brasileira de Milho Sorgo, 4, 436–444. https://doi.org/10.18512/1980-6477/rbms.v4n3p436-444
Paraginski, R. T., Souza, N. L., Alves, G. H., Ziegler, V., Oliveira, M., & Elias, M. C. (2016). Sensory and nutritional evaluation of popcorn kernels with yellow, white and red pericarps expanded in different ways. Journal of Cereal Science, 69, 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2016.05.013
Pena, G. F., Amaral Júnior, A. T. D., Gonçalves, L. S. A., Vivas, M., Ribeiro, R. M., Mafra, G. S., Dos Santos, A., & Scapim, C. A. (2016). Comparison of testers in the selection of S3 families obtained from the UENF-14 variety of popcorn. Bragantia, 75(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.215
Pereira, M. G., & Amaral Júnior, A. T. (2001). Estimation of genetic components in popcorn based on nested design. Crop breeding and applied biotechnology, 1(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.13082/1984-7033.v01n01a01.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In R Foundation for statistical computing. Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
Raid, R. N. (1991). Fungicidal control of foliar sweet corn diseases in the presence of high inoculum levels. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society., 104, 267–270.
Saluci, J. C. G., Vivas, M., Almeida, R. N. de, Dutra, I. P., Carlos, M. C., Amaral Junior, A. T. do., & Scapim, C. A. (2020). Potential of popcorn S4 lines for resistance to southern corn leaf blight. Functional Plant Breeding Jounal, 02(02), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.35418/2526-4117/v2n2a6
Santos, J. S., Vivas, M. Amaral Júnior, A. T. do, Ribeiro, R. M., Mafra, G. S., & Pena, G. F. (2019). Efeitos gênicos da incidência e severidade de Bipolaris maydis em milho-pipoca. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, 14 (4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v14i4a5677.
Sawazaki, E. (2001). A cultura do milho pipoca. O Agronômico, Campinas, 53, 11–13.
Srivastava, A., Mangal, M., Saritha, R. K., & Kalia, P. (2017). Screening of chilli pepper (Capsicum spp.) lines for resistance to the begomoviruses causing chilli leaf curl disease in India. Crop Protection, 100, 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.06.015
Teixeira, F. F., PortugaL, A. F., Oliveira, M. S., Silva, D. D. da, Guimaraes, L. J. M., Guimaraes, P. E. de O., & Parentoni, S. N. (2017). Pré-melhoramento de milho para resistência à mancha-branca e à ferrugem-polissora. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo, 16(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.06.015.
Ullstrup, A. J. (1972). The Impacts of the Southern Corn Leaf Blight Epidemics of 1970-1971. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 10, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.10.090172.000345
Vencovsky, R. (1987). Herança quantitativa. In E. Paterniani (Eds.), Melhoramento e produção de milho no Brasil (2ª ed., 409p).
Vencovsky, R., & Barriga, P. (1992). Genética biométrica no fitomelhoramento. Sociedade Brasileira de Genética.
Vivas, M., Silveira, S. F., Viana, A. P., Amaral Júnior, A. T., Cardoso, D. L., & Pereira, M. G. (2014). Efficiency of circulant diallels via mixed models in the selection of papaya genotypes resistant to foliar fungal diseases. Genetics and Molecular Research, 13, 4797–4804. https://doi.org/10.4238/2014.July.2.9
Ye, Y. F., Li, Q. Q., Fu, G., Yuan, G. Q., Miao, J. H., & Lin, W. (2012). Identification of antifungal substance (Iturin A2) produced by Bacillus subtilis B47 and its effect on southern corn leaf blight. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 11, 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1671-2927(12)60786-X
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense (UENF), the Instituto Federal do Espírito Santo Campus de Alegre (IFES), the Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for financial support.
Funding
This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001. Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense (UENF), the Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
The authors agree to participate.
Consent for publication
All authors have approved the manuscript and agreed on its submission to the European Journal of Plant Pathology.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Saluci, J.C.G., Vivas, M., Dutra, Í.P. et al. Sources of resistance to Bipolaris maydis in popcorn lines under field conditions. Eur J Plant Pathol 165, 545–557 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-022-02626-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-022-02626-3