Abstract
Attention to early childhood mathematics instructional strategies has sharpened due to the relatively poor mathematics performance of U.S. students in comparison to students from other countries and research evidence that early mathematics skills impact later achievement. Early Childhood counting skills form the foundation for subsequent mathematics learning. In this article, we discuss the milestones of counting development and examine preschool classroom mathematics observations through the lenses of two CLASS Dimensions, Concept Development and Instructional Learning Formats. Recommendations for effective instructional strategies around counting and suggestions for incorporating mathematics instruction into storybook reading are provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In recent years, interest from international researchers, teachers, and other education stakeholders in preschool mathematics instructional approaches has gained momentum. This increased interest is evidenced by comparisons of children’s mathematics performance between nationalities (Geary, Bow-Thomas, Fan, and Siegler, 1993; Kovalena, 2010; Miura, Okamoto, Kim, Chang, Steere, & Favol, 1994), and evidence that early mathematics skills form the foundation of later learning (Claessens, & Engel, 2013; Manfra, Dinehart, & Sembiante, 2014). Attention to mathematics instruction in preschool to 1st grade was further sharpened by professional position statements issued in the U.S., (Bredekamp & Copple, 2009; National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2013) and Australia (Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers & Early Childhood Australia, 2006), which highlighted the importance of research-based, high-quality, and challenging mathematics. An emphasis on kindergarten counting and cardinality skills is also apparent in national curricula such as the Common Core State Standards (National Governor’s Association, 2010) in the U. S., the Australian Curriculum (Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority, n.d.), and in the National Curriculum of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom Department for Education, 2013).
Instructional approaches that capture and sustain children’s interest are essential in changing the mathematics learning trajectories of preschool children. The purpose of this article is to discuss preschool mathematics instructional interactions and how they support the learning of counting skills. We will provide concrete examples of classroom interactions and research-based teaching prompts to enhance children’s counting skills using developmental milestones and book reading. Specifically, we will address when children typically achieve each milestone of counting development, what each counting skill involves, and how to implement effective instructional approaches around counting and book reading.
Background
Across the globe, policy makers and practitioners strive to improve mathematics education and learning to meet growing marketplace demands. According to Zhao (2005), there is no one approach that would be effective in all countries; rather, we must consider the contexts and out of school factors to determine appropriate approaches within each country. Despite continuing efforts to improve educational practices within an inquiry-based, constructivist approach, the mathematics performance of school-aged children in some countries, notably the U.S., remains lower than that of children in many other countries (National Center for Education Statistics TIMSS, 2011). Indeed, children of East Asian descent who often learn within a facts-based, systematic approach (Zhao, 2005) consistently outperform non-East Asian children, even when they reside in the U.S. (Lan, Legare, Ponitz, Li, & Morrison, 2011; Wang & Lin, 2009).
Differences in children’s mathematics performance begin before school entry (Siegler & Mu, 2008; Wang & Lin, 2009), thus emphasizing the need to examine preschool instructional approaches, reinforce practices that lead to strong counting skills, and implement research-based instructional improvements. Effective instructional approaches are of particular importance for children from low SES backgrounds as they demonstrate lower mathematics achievement at kindergarten entry and are thus at an early disadvantage (Denton & West, 2002). Children who enter kindergarten without the necessary foundational mathematics skills do not build subsequent mathematics knowledge at the same rate as their peers who entered with stronger mathematics skills, resulting in a widening performance gap as children progress through elementary grades (Bodovsky & Farkas, 2007; Jordan, Kaplan, Ramineni, & Locuniak, 2009; Manfra, Dinehart, & Sembiante, 2014; Morgan, Farkas, & Wu, 2009). Indeed, researchers report that kindergarten entry mathematics skill levels are predictive of much later performance, not only in mathematics but also in other academic content areas including eighth grade reading achievement (Duncan et al., 2007) as well as reading and science (Claessens and Engel, 2013).
Research offers insights into which preschool mathematics skills predict later achievement and can help teachers plan and implement effective instruction during the early years. In a study of low SES preschool counting skills, Manfra, Dinehart, and Sembiante (2014) sought to determine if reciting ability (i.e. chronologically reciting the number words to 20) was as predictive of first grade mathematics achievement as counting ability (i.e., can accurately count up to twenty objects). The preschool children who could count higher numbers of objects (e.g., 20 cubes) were at a greater advantage for later mathematics achievement than the children who were not able to count as many objects and those children who could accurately recite numbers beyond their ability to count objects had an additional advantage. Such findings support the notion that counting is the premier mathematics skill that forms the foundation of later mathematics achievement.
Clements and Sarama (2009) identified counting milestones, which describe a predictable progression of early mathematics learning. The counting milestones provide a map for instructional planning by helping teachers identify children’s current counting skill levels and attainable yet challenging learning goals. Movement from one milestone to the next forms each child’s learning trajectory. The milestones shown in Table 1 form the framework for the teaching strategies discussed in the current article.
While key, implementation of appropriate mathematics activities is only one aspect of how to build counting skills. The quality of instructional approaches during mathematics activities also plays a critical role in engaging children, building confidence and positive attitudes, and advancing children’s mathematics learning trajectories. In the following sections, we will discuss the elements of quality instruction, provide scenarios of actual classroom mathematics activities, and provide teaching prompts to enhance children’s conceptual development and active engagement.
Classroom Instructional Quality
At the heart of effective instruction is pedagogy – that is, the, materials, methods, and learning objectives that teachers implement to convey content knowledge (e.g., mathematics, science, literacy). The elements of pedagogy can be divided into two types: structural and process elements. Some of the structural elements of pedagogy are well known to early childhood educators and are frequently assessed (e.g., ECERS-R; Harms, Clifford, & Cryer, 2004) to improve classroom environments. Structural elements include the physical space, routines, and materials. However, attention to “process elements” is commanding stronger consideration as a marker of quality as these aspects of pedagogy are strongly related to children’s learning outcomes (Howes, Burchinal, Pianta, Bryant, Early, Clifford, & Barbarin, 2008; Mashburn, Pianta, Hamre, Downer, Barbarin, Bryant, Burchinal, Early, & Howes, 2008).
Process elements “refer to…. the ways teachers implement activities and lessons, the nature and qualities of interactions between adults and children…. and the availability of certain types of activities” (Pianta, Barnett, Burchinal, & Thornburg, 2009, p. 66). Through process elements, teachers support children’s mathematics conceptual development by encouraging analysis and reasoning rather than learning solely by rote and by actively engaging children using multiple modalities. Because process elements (e.g., teacher and child interactions) are more strongly related to children’s academic achievement than environmental elements (e.g., room arrangement) (Mashburn, Pianta, Hamre, Downer, Barbarin, Bryant, Burchinal, Early, & Howes, 2008), we focus on instructional approaches and those levels of mathematics conceptual development that are explored during teacher and child interactions.
Process elements can be difficult to assess as teaching styles vary widely from one teacher to another. One measure of process elements, the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS; Pianta, La Paro, & Hamre, 2007), provides rubrics that address a range of teaching styles and defines quality process elements. Unlike environmental rating tools, the CLASS maintains a focus on the teacher’s classroom interactions with children and on how those interactions are used to promote children’s learning. The focus of this article is on two CLASS dimensions, Concept Development and Instructional Learning Formats, which provide useful lenses for teachers to think about the “how” components of teaching during counting activities.
Concept Development has a focus on how teachers use instructional activities to engage children in higher level thinking skills, such as integrating concepts and connecting them to real world experiences, and engaging children in analysis and reasoning activities. Instructional Learning Formats focuses on ways teachers structure learning opportunities, including how they incorporate learning objectives and facilitation of student engagement and interest. In this article, we will highlight effective preschool mathematics instructional approaches by providing examples from classrooms, examining interactions with a CLASS lens, and making connections to research-based pedagogy to enhance learning around counting.
Preschool Classroom Scenarios
Counting learning is evident in common scenarios of preschool mathematics instruction. The observed scenarios described in the tables below are used to illustrate methods of determining children’s current milestone level and strategies used by teachers to enable children to progress to the next milestone. CLASS Concept Development and Instructional Learning Formats dimensions are used to highlight teachers’ instructional practices around counting.
Concept Development and Counting
The critical elements of Concept Development include: analysis and reasoning (questions, problem solving, predictions, classification), creating (planning, producing), integration (connecting concepts, links to prior experiences) and connections to the real world (applications and relation to student lives). Instructional goals include promoting higher level rather than rote thinking skills and using strategies to expand understanding. The scenario examples contrast the types interactions that can promote higher compared to lower levels of concept development related to the counting milestones, (e.g., Reciters to Producers).
High Concept Development Interactions
Higher Conceptual Development is facilitated when children are engaged in intentional, organized problem solving and teachers include activities and questions that support children’s reasoning and use of multiple skills as illustrated in Table 2.
Low Concept Development Interactions
In contrast, during lower level interactions teachers primarily address Reciter skills by having children rote count to 20 or mimic or recite the numerals on a calendar as illustrated in Table 3.
In the Concept Development and Counting section, we reviewed examples of mathematics events that take place in early childhood classrooms. The scenarios illustrated levels of children’s conceptual development and the role of the teacher in facilitating the progression to the next milestone. In the next section, we examine additional classroom mathematics events and relate the observed teaching strategies to the Instructional Learning Formats dimension of the CLASS.
Instructional Learning Formats and Counting
The second aspect of instructional quality is Instructional Learning Formats. The goals are to maximize “interest, engagement, and ability” to learn from instruction and activities. The scenario examples contrast the types interactions that can promote higher compared to lower levels of Instructional Learning Formats.
High Instructional Learning Format Interactions
Classroom activities with higher levels of Instructional Learning Formats are environments where the teacher facilitates child engagement, implements multiple modalities (e.g., visual aids, movement, and sound), provides clearly stated learning objectives, and works to maintain high levels of engagement in activities as illustrated in Table 4.
Low Instructional Learning Format Interactions
Interactions on the lower level of Instructional Learning Formats often focus on Reciter skills and less on using questions to elicit or scaffold Producer level responses as illustrated in Table 5.
The classroom scenarios illustrate highly effective and less effective Instructional Learning Formats to enhance counting skills. Teachers utilize different materials to capture students’ interests but do not always use effective questioning and maintain active student engagement in the activities. By using the CLASS Instructional Learning Formats lens, teachers can develop more effective interaction skills, make the best use of children’s interest, and engage children in mathematics lessons and activities.
Summary of the Scenarios
The provided scenarios are accompanied by suggested strategies to foster progression along the learning trajectories of counting. In the following section, we provide suggestions to maximize instructional time by incorporating quality mathematics instruction during shared storybook reading. We will discuss effective questioning during book reading to attain counting milestones and present teaching strategies to achieve higher level CLASS Concept Development and Instructional Learning Formats.
Purposeful Mathematics Activities through Literature
Literacy instruction, including book reading, is a typical part of preschool classroom daily routines and is often allotted more time than mathematics instruction when multiple curricular demands conflict (Ginsburg, Lee, & Boyd, 2008; Phillips, Gormley, & Lowenstein, 2009) yet literacy and mathematics instruction need not be mutually exclusive. Indeed, linguistic (Kleemans, Peeters, Segers & Verhoeven, 2012; Sarama, Lange, Clements, & Wolfe, 2011) and literacy (Purpura, Hume, Sims, & Lonigan, 2011) skills are related to numeracy conceptual development. The combination of book talks and instructional learning formats provides an effective forum for mathematics facilitation (Baroody & Seo, 2000), increasing the variation in modalities and materials, increasing student interest, and targeting clear learning objectives.
Counting concepts can be easily integrated into literacy activities through intentional selection of age appropriate and engaging books. Instructional practices that incorporate process elements, such as Concept Development and Instructional Learning Formats, into book reading can build higher level thinking skills and sustain children’s attention by engaging them in problem solving activities. These practices in turn can provide opportunities for children to practice Reciting, Corresponding, and Counting skills on the way to becoming Producers.
The key to effective use of any book starts with a book talk to provide advance organizers (Ausubel, 1960). Instruction begins by looking through the book with the children and encouraging them to talk about the pictures, make predictions of what will happen in the story, and to connect their own experiences to story elements. As part of Instructional Learning Formats, learning objectives can be clarified through advanced organizers (e.g., “We are going to read a book about a cat with four buttons on his shirt and count them each time one falls off.”) and summary statements, (e.g., “So, we just read about Pete’s buttons. Each time one fell off he had fewer buttons. We counted his buttons. Let’s count again.”) so that the whole group of children can attend to the mathematical language and the instructional purpose of the story. In Table 6, we provide a list of books and describe how they can be connected to core mathematics concepts.
During story activities, instructional strategies can be used to support children’s understanding of counting concepts. For example, Concept Development strategies include reasoning questions, such as, “Why are those numbers in the picture?” “What patterns did you see?” “Tell me why you think he had more?” Teachers can use the counting sequence, ask children for their ideas on how counting can solve the story’s dilemma, and use frequent pauses to engage children in conversations about their predictions (“How did it really happen?” “Why was our prediction right?”). Examples of how to support counting skills at each milestone are illustrated in Table 7.
During book reading, story characters and their dilemmas can be used to brainstorm solutions and for relating to personal experiences. Strategies involving Instructional Learning Formats can be used to intentionally include movement, language, and hands-on activities to engage children in applying their counting skills to the story. Focusing children’s attention by pointing out numbers embedded in pictures, having children use tokens to measure lengths or heights (e.g., Chicka, Chicka 1, 2, 3 math activities; Martin, 2004), and discussing the definitions of words used in a story (e.g., “How big is a gazillion?”) can provide opportunities for learning and connecting learning to mathematic objectives. Finally, teachers’ knowledge of the counting milestones can inform book selection that meets the children’s developmental needs.
Conclusion
Preschool children are quite capable of mathematics learning and, in fact, choose to engage in mathematical thinking during everyday activities (NAEYC & NCTM, 2010). Research supports that the mathematics knowledge children bring to kindergarten is related to their mathematics learning in later years (National Math Panel, 2008), and that children from lower-income backgrounds who are at risk of achievement gaps can learn mathematics skills when they engage in high-quality early childhood experiences. Mathematics events, such as determining how many short blocks equal the length of a longer block or counting friends in housekeeping, are developmentally appropriate, take place naturally in children’s play settings, and are connected to children’s own life experiences. Together, these events meet recommendations for high-quality early childhood practices (Copple & Bredekamp, 2009).
Ultimately, mathematics talk is key to children’s development (Klibanoff, Levine, Huttenlocher, Vasilyeva & Hedges, 2006). Teacher strategies of using why and how questions, problem solving in guided learning, and center play activities are vital teacher – student interactions that build children’s understanding of mathematics. Teachers who make connections to past learning, link concepts, and facilitate active engagement in classroom activities support higher levels of Conceptual Development as defined by the CLASS.
In the above sections, we provided suggestions for teacher questioning strategies that promote higher level counting skills. We also provided strategies for scaffolding counting skills during storybook reading with a list of age appropriate books to help children progress from Reciter to Producer and suggested the use of the CLASS as a tool for teachers to refine mathematics interactions. As illustrated in the classroom scenarios, instructional strategies to support counting skill development need not require major shifts in current practices. Simple changes in mathematics interactions that are already taking place can enable children to show their thinking skills around Counting and enable teachers to see how children are progressing from Reciter to Producer. Through use of the Counting Milestones, teachers can identify children’s current skill levels and determine appropriate learning goals to promote counting learning trajectories.
As nations work to develop and refine early learning guidelines or standards to ensure that all children enter school ready to succeed, attention to mathematics as a core area has increased. Early learning standards have clarified the mathematics concepts to be targeted by age or grade, the behavioral indicators reflecting children’s learning, and the activities with which teachers, parents, and other caregivers can engage children to increase mathematics learning. High-quality pre-service educational and in-service professional development opportunities to enhance instructional approaches around mathematics are key in the efforts to improve early mathematics learning outcomes.
Early childhood teachers have an invaluable opportunity to arm themselves with research-based instructional approaches to improve children’s mathematics outcomes. Teachers can make use of the knowledge gained through the mathematics milestones to enhance foundational counting skills through intentional instruction during everyday activities. These efforts guided by international professional organizations highlight the importance of key content and pedagogy that will prepare young children for the mathematics they will need for future academic success.
References
Aker, S. (1990). What comes in 2s, 3s & 4s?. New York, NY: Scholastic.
Arenson, R. (1998). One, two skip a few. New York, NY: Scholastic.
Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers & Early Childhood Australia (2006). Position paper on early childhood mathematics. Retrieved from www.aamt.edu.au
Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority. (n.d.). Australian Curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au
Ausubel, D. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 267–272.
Baroody, A., & Seo, K. H. (2000). Preschoolers’ mathematical reading. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7, 226–229.
Bodovski, K., & Farkas, G. (2007). Mathematics growth in early elementary school: The roles of beginning knowledge, student engagement, and instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 108, 115–130.
Bredekamp, S. & Copple, C. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practices in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Position Statement. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
Carle, E. (2007). 1, 2, 3 to the zoo. New York, NY: Grosset & Dunlap.
Claessens, A., & Engel, M. (2013). How important is where you start? Early mathematics knowledge and later school success. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–29.
Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and Teaching Early Math: The Learning Trajectories Approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
Crews, D. (1995). Ten black dots. New York, NY: Greenwillow.
Dean, J., & Litwin, E. (2012). Pete the cat and his four groovy buttons. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Denton, K., & West, J. (2002). Children’s reading and mathematics achievement in kindergarten and first grade. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Statistics.
Geary, D., Bow-Thomas, C., Fan, L., & Siegler, R. (1993). Even before formal instruction. Chinese children outperform American children in mental addition, Cognitive Development, 8, 517–529.
Giganti, P. (1988). How many snails? New York, NY: Greenwillow Books.
Giganti, P., & Crews, D. (1999). Each orange had eight slices. New York, NY: Greenwillow Books.
Ginsburg, H.P., Lee, J., and Boyd, S. (2008). Mathematics education for young children: What it is and how to promote it. In Social Policy Report 22 (Eds.). L. Sherrod & J Brooks-Gunn. (pp. 3-22). Society for Research in Child Development. Ann Arbor, MI
Harms, T., Clifford, R., & Cryer, D. (2004). Early childhood environment rating scale revised. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.
Hoban, T. (1997). More, fewer, less. New York, NY: Greenwillow.
Howes, C., Burchinal, M., Pianta, R., Bryant, D., Early, D., Clifford, R., et al. (2008). Ready to learn? Children’s pre-academic achievement in pre-kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 108–123.
Jordan, N., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45, 850–867.
Kleemans, T., Peeters, M., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2012). Child and home predictors of early numeracy skills in kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 471–477.
Klibanoff, R., Levine, S., Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., & Hedges, H. (2006). Preschool children’s mathematical knowledge: The effect of teacher ‘math talk’. Developmental Psychology, 43, 59–69.
Kovalena, G. (2010). The TIMSS study: The quality of education in mathematics and natural sciences in Russia exceeds average international indicators. Russian Education and Society, 52, 72–89.
Lan, X., Legare, C., Ponitz, C., Li, S., & Morrison, F. (2011). Investigating the links between the subcomponents of executive function and academic achievement: A cross-cultural analysis of Chinese and American preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 677–692.
Manfra, L., Dinehart, L., & Sembiante, S. (2014). Associations between counting ability in preschool and mathematic performance in first grade among a sample of ethnically diverse, low-income children. Journal of Research in Childhood Education International, 28, 101–114.
Martin, B. (2004). Chicka chicka 1, 2, 3. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Mashburn, A., Pianta, R., Hamre, B., Downer, J., Barbarin, O., Bryant, D., et al. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79, 732–749.
Merriam, E. (1996). 12 ways to get to 11. New York, NY: Aladdin.
Miura, I., Okamoto, Y., Kim, C., Chang, C., Steere, M., & Fayol, M. (1994). Comparisons of children’s cognitive representation of number: China, France, Japan, Korea, Sweden, and the United States. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17, 401–411.
Morgan, P., Farkas, G., & Wu, Q. (2009). Five-year growth trajectories of kindergarten children with learning difficulties in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 306–321.
Murphy, S. (1997). Elevator magic. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Murphy, S. (2000). Monster musical chairs. New York, NY: Scholastic.
Murphy, S., & Dunbar, F. (1997). Every buddy counts. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
National Association for the Education of Young Children & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2010). Early childhood mathematics: Promoting good beginnings a joint position statement. Washington DC: NAEYC.
National Center for Education Statistics (2011). Trends in international mathematics and sciences study. Retrieved from https://www.nces.ed.gov/TIMSS/
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2013). Mathematics in early childhood learning: A position statement of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Governor’s Association. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers.
National Math Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the national mathematics advisory panel. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Pfister, M. (2004). Rainbow fish counting. New York, NY: North-South Books.
Phillips, D., Gormley, W., & Lowenstein, A. (2009). Inside the pre-kindergarten door: Classroom climate and instructional time allocation in Tulsa’s pre-K programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24, 213–228.
Pianta, R., Barnett, W., Burchinal, M., & Thornburg, K. (2009). The effects of preschool education: What we know, how public policy is or is not aligned with the evidence base, and what we need to know. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10, 49–88.
Pianta, R., La Paro, K., & Hamre, B. (2007). Classroom assessment scoring system. Charlottesville, NC: Teachstone.
Purpura, D., Hume, L., Sims, D., & Lonigan, C. (2011). Literacy and early numeracy: The value of including literacy skills in the prediction of numeracy development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 647–658.
Root, P. (2003). One duck stuck. Cambridge, MA: Candlewick.
Sarama, J., Lange, A., Clements, D., & Wolfe, C. (2011). The impacts of an early mathematics curriculum on oral language and literacy. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 489–502.
Sayre, A., & Sayre, J. (2006). One is a snail, ten is a crab: A counting by feet book. Cambridge, MA: Candlewick.
Siegler, R., & Mu, Y. (2008). Chinese children excel on novel mathematics problems even before elementary school. Psychological Science, 19, 759–763.
United Kingdom Department for Education. (2013). Mathematics programmes of study: Key stages 1 and 2 national curriculum in England. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/239129/PRIMARY_national_curriculum_-_Mathematics.pdf
Wang, J., & Lin, E. (2009). A meta-analysis of comparative studies on Chinese and US students’ mathematics performance: Implications for mathematics education reform and research. Educational Research Review, 4, 177–195.
Wilson, K. (2007). A frog in the bog. New York, NY: Margaret K. McElderry Books.
Zhao, Y. (2005). Increasing math and science achievement: The best and worst of the East and West. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 219–222.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jacobi-Vessels, J.L., Todd Brown, E., Molfese, V.J. et al. Teaching Preschoolers to Count: Effective Strategies for Achieving Early Mathematics Milestones. Early Childhood Educ J 44, 1–9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-014-0671-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-014-0671-4