Introduction

Converting inedible agricultural and forestry waste into profitable substances, fuels, as well as materials is a practical manner to solve environmental problems and promote the development of a circular economy. Pueraria edulis Pampan. is a dietary and curative plant (Guo et al. 2021), and after extracting its starch, a large amount of P. edulis Pampan. residue is left. Landfilling or incinerating this residue would cause environmental pollution and waste of resources. However, P. edulis Pampan. residue has a cellulose content of 59% (Peng et al. 2022), which can be hydrolyzed to produce glucose (Wu et al. 2020) and subsequently be transformed into a variety of platform chemicals, including fructose (Marianou et al. 2016; Chen et al. 2020), HMF (Wei et al. 2022), levulinic acid (Chen et al. 2022) and Lactic acid (LaA) (Ye et al. 2021), among others. Within these, LaA is the primary monomer used in the synthesis of the biodegradable polymer polylactic acid. Finding an effective and ecologically friendly chemical conversion pathway for the production of LaA using cellulose, native biomass from P. edulis Pampan. residue, as raw material, is a crucial and challenging task.

A multifunctional-hydroxy carboxylic acid, LaA (2-hydroxypropionic acid) has a number of applications in the chemical, medicinal, and food various industries. As a component for producing green solvents or other bio-based compounds like acrylic acid, 2,3-pentanedione, and acetaldehyde, LaA has garnered significant study interest (SerranoRuiz et al. 2011; Dusselier et al. 2013; Deng et al. 2018a, 2018b). Currently, the production of LaA is mainly based on a bio-fermentation process, which involves the pre-treatment of biomass with acid or alkali. In addition, biological enzymes are highly sensitive to the working environment during fermentation, and strict control of the reaction medium’s pH value is required, making the operation process complex (Dusselier et al. 2013; Castillo Martinez et al. 2013; Qureshi et al. 2017). Compared to traditional LaA production processes, designing a rational green and sustainable catalytic system for catalyzing the conversion of abundant biomass resources (such as cellulose biomass) into high value-added product LaA has important research significance (Wattanapaphawong et al. 2017).

Dihydroxyacetone (Dapsens et al. 2013; Feliczak-Guzik et al. 2018; Hossain et al. 2021; Rahaman et al. 2022), glycerol (Xu et al. 2013, 2022; Lu et al. 2016; Palacio et al. 2018), hexoses (glucose and fructose) (Zhao et al. 2018, 2021; Wang et al. 2021; Kupila et al. 2021), cellulose and biomass feedstock (Wang et al. 2013a, 2013b; Lei et al. 2014; Li et al. 2019; Dong et al. 2022a) are the raw materials for LaA synthesis. The conversion of cellulose to LaA is more difficult than that of monosaccharides because it needs the selective activation and breaking of certain C–O and C–C bonds (Li et al. 2019) (Scheme 1). Catalysts for cellulose to LaA conversion include homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts. Homogeneous catalysts often use metal salt catalysts (Al3+, VO2+, Pb2+, Zn2+ and Sn2+) (Zhang et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2013a, 2013b; Tang et al. 2014; Deng et al. 2018a, 2018b) and alkaline catalysts (NaOH, Ca (OH)2, Ba (OH)2) (Esposito and Antonietti 2013). However, due to the difficulties of separation and recovery, the strong corrosiveness of alkaline conditions, and the occurrence of side reactions with sugar compounds, their large-scale application is limited (Gezae Daful and Görgens 2017).

In comparison, heterogeneous catalysts are more attractive for industrial use. Currently, metal oxides, molecular sieves, metal-organic frameworks, aluminum-silicate oxide-supported metals and carbon-based solid acid catalysts have been used in the conversion of glyceraldehyde, glucose, and cellulose to LaA(Rahaman et al. 2022; Kupila et al. 2021; Huang et al. 2017; Shen et al. 2019; Xiao et al. 2022; Xu et al. 2022). The yield of LaA was 24% using LaCoO3 perovskite metal as a catalyst for cellulose conversion (Yang et al. 2016). Sn–KIT–6-Pr–SO3H was employed for cellulose conversion, yielding 16.2% LaA and 88.9% cellulose conversion (Cai et al. 2019). Efficient conversion of cellulose to LaA on yttrium-modified beta zeolite, achieving LaA yields of up to 49.2% (Ye et al. 2021). TSA/SiO2–Al2O3 was used as the catalyst to achieve LaA yield of 23.5%, selectivity of 38.4% and cellulose conversion of 61.2% (Marianou et al. 2019). In addition, a maximum LaA production of 42% was attained by using lignin-based activated carbon-supported metal oxides as catalysts to create LaA from glucose (Kupila et al. 2021). Many studies have shown that preparing supported catalysts is an effective way to reduce catalyst costs and improve catalytic performance (Yang et al. 2020). Compared with molecular sieves and metal-organic frameworks, lignin-based carbon materials are cheaper, simpler to prepare, and have more environmentally friendly chemical production processes. They can also be used as co-catalysts to improve catalytic activity, enhancing their chemical and physical properties by modifying their specific surface functional groups and pore structures (Pérez-Mayoral et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2022).

In this work, lignin-based carbonaceous support (LCSA) was prepared by one-step sulphonation and carbonization with chlorosulfonic acid and lignin-based solid acid catalysts were obtained by loading amphoteric metals Al and Zn on the support. The prepared catalysts were used to test the catalytic activity in the conversion of Pueraria cellulose to LaA. It was found that LCSA–Al could effectively convert Pueraria cellulose to LaA in an aqueous solution, and the substrate could be extended to biomass from other sources.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Reaction route of cellulose into LaA and main byproducts

Materials and methods

Materials

P. edulis Pampan. residue was obtained from Hunan Zhangjiajie Jiutian Biotechnology Co., Ltd; Lignin was bought from the Shandong Longlive Bio-technology Co., Ltd; dichloromethane (≥ 99.5%) was purchased from Shanghai Titan Scientific Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China; Chloro-sulfonic acid (99.0%) was purchased from Energy Chemical Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China; AlCl3·6H2O (AR) and ZnCl2 (AR) and 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF, 97%) were bought from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. LaA (99%) was purchased from Shanghai Nature Standard Technical Services Co., Ltd. All chemicals were used as supplied without any further purification. Deionized water used in this work was prepared using a water purification system (Heal Force, Shanghai Shengke Equipment Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

Extraction of Pueraria cellulose

Similar to our previous investigation, the Pueraria cellulose extraction technique was carried out (Peng et al. 2022). The specific extraction method is as follows: the washed P. edulis Pampan. residue was crushed and 5 g were placed in 250 mL of sodium chlorite solution with a concentration of 4%. The pH value was adjusted to 3–4 with concentrated hydrochloric acid, and the residue was treated at 100 °C for 2 h. The obtained residue was washed with deionized water until the aqueous solution was neutral. Dry at 100 °C to obtain P. edulis Pampan. residue after sodium chlorite treatment. The 5 g of the powder treated with sodium chlorite was put in 250 mL sodium hydroxide solution with 15% concentration and treated at 80 °C for 2 h. The residue was washed with deionized water until the aqueous solution was neutral. After drying at 100 °C, Pueraria cellulose with 94% purity was obtained.

Preparation of catalysts

Preparation of LCSA

The carbonaceous support was prepared from lignin by one-step carbonization and sulfonation with chlorosulfonic acid. The composition of used lignin is provided in Table S1 (Supplementary material). In an ice-water bath, 2 g of lignin was added to a round-bottom flask containing 30 mL of dichloromethane and stirred. Then 4.5 mL (15% dichloromethane) chlorosulfonic acid was added drop by drop to the mixed solution. The mixture was stirred in a nitrogen atmosphere for 6 h, and then anhydrous ethanol was cautiously added to the round-bottom flask until no bubbles were generated in the flask. Finally, centrifuged to remove dichloromethane and anhydrous ethanol. Eventually, the remaining solids were dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C  for 12 h. The support was named LCSA.

Preparation of the catalyst

The LCSA–AlxZny catalyst was prepared by the impregnation method. The specific operation is shown in Scheme 2. In a typical preparation method, 0.01 mol AlCl3·6H2O and 0.01 mol ZnCl2 were prepared as 0.2 mol/L solutions, respectively. LCSA and the solution configured above were mixed in a mass ratio of AlxZny: LCSA = 1:2 (x and y respectively represent the proportion of Al and Zn in the load solution calculated according to mass) and stirred for 24 h until evenly dispersed. Suction filtration and washing until the filtrate was close to neutral. The obtained suspension was dried in an oven at 105 °C for 12 h to remove water. The prepared catalysts are named LCSA–Al, LCSA–Zn, LCSA–AlZn, LCSA–Al2Zn, LCSA–AlZn2.

Scheme 2
scheme 2

Preparation of lignin-derived carbon-based solid acid catalysts

Catalyst characterization

The catalyst samples, Pueraria cellulose and P. edulis Pampan. residues were characterized and analyzed on a scanning electron microscope (SEM, QUANTA FEG 450). The morphology of samples was observed at 15 kV. Energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was performed using an X-Max instrument (Oxford Instruments). The prepared catalyst powder was characterized using a SmartLab9 X-ray diffractometer from RIKEN, Japan. The radiation source was Cu–Kα (λ = 0.15416 nm), and the device was used to record X-ray diffractograms at a sample voltage and current of 40 kV and 40 mA, respectively, and a scan rate of 10° min−1. The diffractograms were collected at 0.02o intervals in the 2θ range of 5o–90o. The specific surface area of the catalysts was determined on a TriStar II Plus 3030 physisorption instrument shipped from Mack, USA. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption measurements were performed at − 196 °C to obtain the specific surface area of the catalysts, and the average pore size and pore volume of the samples were calculated using the BJH method. Before measurement, the samples were heated in a vacuum at 140 °C for 3 h to eliminate moisture and volatile contaminants.

Infrared analysis of the catalysts was performed using a Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometer (Nicolet-iS10, Thermo Scientific, USA) with a wave number range of 400–4000 cm−1. To determine the total acidity of the catalyst, NH3–TPD (programmed ramp-up desorption) was performed in a BELCAT (Bayer, Japan) analyzer. The sample tubes were filled with 0.1 g of catalyst and pretreated at 350 °C for 30 min in a helium atmosphere. After cooling to 100 °C, the sample was placed in an NH3/He (5%) gas stream for 1 h. The physically adsorbed NH3 was then removed using a dry helium stream for 30 min. Finally, TPD was measured in the dry helium stream at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 from 100 to 800 °C.

Catalyst performance tests

All reactions were performed in a 25 mL batch-type Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave. In a typical catalytic experiment, 50 mg of Pueraria cellulose, 50 mg of catalyst, and 10 mL of water were charged into the reactor. The reaction mixture was heated to the necessary reaction temperature for a time with stirring at 600 rpm. Then the test reactor was taken out of the oil bath, then cooled quickly to room temperature with plenty of cold water. The liquid mixture was passed through a 0.45-µm filter and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) after the reaction.

The LaA yield was determined using an HPLC (Agilent-1260, USA) equipped with an ultraviolet-visible detector (λ = 210 nm). A C18 reversed-phase chromatographic column (Waters, 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) was used for chromatographic separation. A mobile phase of 0.1% phosphoric acid water and acetonitrile (95:5, v/v) was used for the isocratic elution. The column temperature was 30  °C. The flow rate and injection volume were maintained at 0.5 mL/min, and 20 µL, respectively. The conversion of Pueraria cellulose and the yields of the products (weight based) were calculated according to the follows:

$$Conversion_{{cellulose}} (\% ) = 100 \times \frac{{Pueraria\,{\text{cellulose}}\,{\text{reacted}}\,\left( g \right)}}{{Pueraria\,{\text{cellulose}}\,{\text{initial}}\,\left( g \right)}}$$
(1)
$$Yield_{{product}} (\% ) = 100 \times \frac{{{\text{product}}\,{\text{produced}}\,\left( g \right)}}{{Pueraria\,{\text{cellulose}}\,{\text{initial}}\,\left( g \right)}}$$
(2)

Results and discussion

P. edulis Pampan. Residue and Pueraria cellulose characterization

Figure 1 demonstrates the SEM results of P. edulis Pampan. residue and Pueraria cellulose. The surface of the P. edulis Pampan. residue was rough and stuck to one another, as can be seen in Fig. 1a. The diameter of P. edulis Pampan. residue is about 120 μm. After the two-step treatment with NaClO2 and NaOH, Fig. 1b shows that the Pueraria cellulose disintegrated into rods, and its diameter is about 18 μm, indicating that the non-cellulose components of the P. edulis Pampan. residue was successfully eliminated and high purity of Pueraria cellulose was produced.

Fig. 1
figure 1

SEM images of (a) P. edulis Pampan. residue and (b) Pueraria cellulose

There are various crystal forms of cellulose, and each crystal form has unique physicochemical features. As seen in Fig. S1, the diffraction peaks for P. edulis Pampan. residue and Pueraria cellulose appear at 2θ = 15.2°, 16.4°, 22.8°, and 34.9°, respectively. These peaks correspond to the cellulose (1_10), (110), (200), and (004) crystal planes, indicating that they belong to cellulose I (Tarchoun et al. 2019). The continuity of the diffraction peaks did not change after the chemical treatment implying that the chemical treatment had no impact at all on the cellulose crystal structure. According to the crystallinity index equation (Kian et al. 2017), the crystallinity of P. edulis Pampan. residue and Pueraria cellulose were 54.4% and 71.5%, respectively. The removal of the non-cellulose components from the P. edulis Pampan. residue may also be suggested by an increase in crystallinity.

FT-IR was used to determine the chemical compositions and functional groups of samples. According to Fig. 2, the O–H stretching vibration and the C–H asymmetric stretching vibration of the cellulose glucose unit, respectively, caused noticeable peaks in all samples at about 3333 and 2917 cm−1 (Fareez et al. 2018). In this wave number range, the peak shoulders of Pueraria cellulose widened. This is caused by the exposure of cellulose and the removal of non-cellulose P. edulis Pampan. residue components. All of the samples had a characteristic peak at 1622 cm−1, which was generated by the O–H bending vibration of the water absorption peak adsorbed on the sample surface. Other characteristic peaks included those at 1423 and 1316 cm−1, which were caused by the H–C–H bending and stretching vibrations of the cellulose glucose unit. 1157 cm−1, which was caused by the C–O–C asymmetric vibrations on the cellulose glucose ring. 1027 cm−1 by C–O stretching vibration, and the characteristic peak around 898 cm−1 was caused by C–O–C stretching vibration of β-1,4 glycosidic bond (Sun et al. 2005; Yue et al. 2019; Tanpichai et al. 2019). The difference is that the absorption peaks around 1730 and 1245 cm−1 of P. edulis Pampan. residue corresponds to C=O connecting hemicellulose to the acetyl or glyoxylate group of lignin (Sain and Panthapulakkal 2006) and C–O of lignin (Tarchoun et al. 2019), respectively, while the absorption peak of Pueraria cellulose disappears here. It indicates that the lignin and hemicellulose of P. edulis Pampan. residue was effectively removed after two steps of NaClO2 and NaOH treatment.

Fig. 2
figure 2

FT-IR analysis of P. edulis Pampan. residue and Pueraria cellulose

Catalyst characterization

As shown in Fig. 3, the image adopts SEM mode, and at the same time, combines EDS analysis and quantitative mapping to detect the elemental composition of the material. SEM image of LI (a) displayed an irregular shape formed by a large number of spherical particles. Lignin after one-step sulfonation carbonization LCSA (d) shows heterogeneous polylateral morphology (Balasubramanian and Venkatachalam. 2022). A large number of cracks on the outer surface of the carbon carrier, and this morphological feature facilitates the formation of outstanding catalytic properties and a stabilized carbon skeleton structure. This stable carbon skeleton structure can provide an effective reaction site, which can ensure the effective binding of sulfonic acid groups to the inner and outer surfaces of the carbon carrier, resulting in an increase in the total acidity of the catalyst and also promoting the subsequent hydrolysis reaction. More cellulose molecules enter the catalyst to undergo hydrolysis, isomerization, and other chemical reactions with hydrogen ions, thereby increasing the yield of LaA. The uniform distribution of aluminum and zinc on the surface of LCSA was observed in the SEM-EDS elemental mappings image of LCSA–Al (Fig. 3), LCSA–Zn (Fig.S2), LCSA–AlZn, LCSA–Al2Zn and LCSA–AlZn2, respectively, indicating the successful loading of Al and Zn onto the lignin carbon-based carrier. The homogeneous distribution of sulfur elements indicates the successful grafting of sulfonate onto the carrier.

Fig. 3
figure 3

SEM images of (a) LI–3 μm, (b) LCSA-3 μm, (c) LCSA–Al–3 μm and (d) LCSA-500 μm. SEM-EDS elemental mappings of LCSA–Al, with the coloring of the (e) aluminum (red) and (f) sulfur (green)

XRD patterns of lignin (LI)、after sulfonation carbonization (LCSA) and loading metal Al after sulfonation and carbonization (LCSA–Al) are presented in Fig. S3. As depicted in Fig. S3, there is no strong peak in the whole XRD spectrum, indicating that the material does not exist crystal structure. A broad peak at 2θ 20–25° and a weak characteristic peak at 40–50° signifies the C (002) and C (101) plane of graphite crystallites, respectively. These peaks accord with randomly permutation amorphous carbon with low crystalline graphite content (Balasubramanian and Venkatachalam. 2022). Therefore, lignin-based solid acid is a polycyclic aromatic compound with an amorphous carbon structure (Gan et al. 2017). Studies have shown that the amorphous carbon structure is conducive to the loading of SO3H groups to prepare solid acid catalysts (Wang et al. 2022). Compared with the diffraction pattern of lignin, the diffraction peak of sulfonated carbon shifted slightly to the right, which may be due to the strong oxidation characteristics of chlorosulfonic acid and carbon (Gan et al. 2017).

No clear peak was detected for Al, possibly due to small particle size or low concentration of the catalyst material. Overall, the diffraction pattern shows that the crystallinity of Al is not high, indicating the presence of an amorphous phase or very small particles on the surface of the support (Kupila et al. 2021), which can also be seen in the SEM-EDS elemental mappings image.

It can be seen from the nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm (Fig. 4) that the material exhibits typical characteristics of mesoporous material with type IV isotherm and H3 hysteresis loop (Tong et al. 2022). As shown in Table 1, Compared with lignin, the specific surface area, pore volume and pore diameter of the lignin carbon-based catalyst are all reduced, which is due to the metal is loaded on the surface of the lignin carbon-based support or enters its pore channels. The pore diameter of LCSA is larger than LCSA–Zn, LCSA–AlZn, LCSA–AlZn2 and LCSA–Al2Zn. The high catalytic activity of LCSA–Al may be attributed to its wide pore diameter, which enables the Pueraria cellulose to make more complete contact with the catalyst’s active site.

Fig. 4
figure 4

N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of the LI and LCSA, LCSA–Al, LCSA–Zn, LCSA–AlZn, LCSA–AlZn2 and LCSA–Al2Zn

Table 1 Specific surface areas and pore sizes and pore volume of LI and catalysts

The LI, LCSA and LCSA–Al chemical structures were characterized with FT-IR analysis (Fig. 5). All spectra show a wide transmittance band at 3200–3600 cm−1 with a maximum at roughly 3417–3430 cm−1. This band can be assigned to the O–H stretching mode of hydroxyl groups and adsorbed water (Kusuma et al. 2021). The C–H absorption peaks near 3000 cm−1 and 869 cm−1 are located in the aromatic skeleton, respectively (Li et al. 2018). It can be seen from the figure that after loading the metal Al, the C–H absorption peak of LCSA–Al is weakened, possibly because Al replaces H on the C–H bond. The peak at 1700 cm−1 was attributed to the C=O stretching vibration (Sangsiri et al. 2022); the stretching vibration peaks of S=O and C–S were at 1030 cm−1 and 645 cm−1, respectively. This means that –SO3H is successfully attached to the surface of the lignin-based carbon skeleton by replacing H on the carbon material skeleton and by forming covalent bonds with the skeleton (Suganuma et al. 2011).

Fig. 5
figure 5

FT-IR analysis of LI, LCSA and LCSA–Al catalysts

NH3–TPD analyses were used to detect the acid strength of catalyst surfaces. Desorption peak temperatures above 350 °C are considered to belong to strong acidic sites, 200–350 °C is medium-strong acidic sites, and below 200 °C is weak acidic sites (Xu et al. 2022). From the Fig. 6, it can be seen that LCSA exhibits a small desorption peak centered around 175 °C, followed by a relatively strong and broad NH3 desorption peak in the range of 450–600 °C, indicating that the surface of this sample has two different types of acidic sites: weak and strong. The sample has strong acidity because a large number of sulfonic acid groups were grafted on the carbonaceous support after the treatment of lignin with chlorosulfonic acid. The FT-IR (Fig. 5) characterization also proved that the sulfonic acid group was successfully grafted on the carbonaceous support. As can be seen from Table 2, when metal ions were loaded on the lignin-based carbon support, the surface acidity was significantly increased, and the surface acidity of LCSA–Al (1.54 mmol/g), LCSA–AlZn (2.32 mmol/g), LCSA–Al2Zn (1.97 mmol/g) and LCSA–AlZn2 (1.49 mmol/g) were significantly enhanced compared to LCSA (0.64 mmol/g). Additionally, compared to LCSA–Al (1.54 mmol/g), LCSA–AlZn (2.32 mmol/g) and LCSA–Al2Zn (1.97 mmol/g) had higher acid densities. It is concluded that the excellent catalytic performance of LCSA–Al may be due to its appropriate acid site density.

Fig. 6
figure 6

NH3–TPD profiles of LCSA, LCSA–Al, LCSA–Zn, LCSA–AlZn, LCSA–AlZn2 and LCSA–Al2Zn

Table 2 Total amount of acidity of catalysts determined by NH3–TPD.

Screening of catalysts

The catalytic performances of no catalyst, LCSA, and different Al/Zn ratios loaded on LCSA were investigated. The conversion rate of Pueraria cellulose and the yield of LaA are shown in Table 3. The blank experiment obtained a LaA yield of 2.4%, which was much lower than the LaA yield obtained with the participation of catalysts, indicating that the series of prepared lignin-based carbon solid acid catalysts have high activity. The catalytic performance of LCSA was relatively weak among all the prepared lignin-based carbon solid acid catalysts, indicating that Brønsted acid alone is not sufficient for cellulose conversion to LaA. The principal by-product of the process of converting Pueraria cellulose into LaA is HMF, along with a trace of formic acid, acetic acid, and levulinic acid (Lei et al. 2014). With the increase of the aluminum content in the catalyst, the yield of LaA increases, indicating that aluminum is more conducive to promoting the conversion of Pueraria cellulose to LaA than zinc. From the data in the Table 3, surprisingly, when the content of Zn in the catalyst increases, the conversion rate of Pueraria cellulose increases while the yield of LaA decreases. Suggesting that zinc can promote Pueraria cellulose to convert to other pathways. Based on the preliminary research results, LCSA–Al was determined as the catalyst with the best effect according to the yield of LaA. LCSA–Al was further analyzed for the production of LaA.

Table 3 Screening of catalysts

Effect of reaction time and reaction temperature on catalytic reaction

Using LCSA–Al as the catalyst based on the preliminary screening of the catalysts, the effects of reaction time (0.5–3.0 h) and temperature (140–200 °C) on the conversion rate of Pueraria cellulose (Fig. 7b) and LaA yield (Fig. 7a) were investigated. It can be observed that when the temperature rises, the rate of cellulose conversion also improves, indicating that high temperature is conducive to cellulose hydrolysis. At 200 °C, the conversion rate increased dramatically within 1 h and reached 100% in 3 h. At lower temperatures (140–160 °C), cellulose can also be hydrolyzed, and it was speculated that the strong Brønsted acidity exhibited by –SO3H in LCSA–Al promotes the cleavage of cellulose glycosidic bonds and its hydrolysis (Li et al. 2018). In Fig. 7a, it was found that before 1 h of reaction, the LaA yield raises as the reaction temperature goes up (140–180 °C), especially at 160 °C where the yield increase is most significant. After 1 h of reaction, the LaA yield at 180 °C shows a decreasing trend with increasing reaction time due to the production of by-products (such as humic acid and HMF). The LaA yield at 200 °C was very low, suggesting that side reactions occur under this temperature. At 160 °C, although the conversion rate of Pueraria cellulose was not as high as that at 180 °C and 200 °C, the LaA yield grows initially before declining over time, reaching the maximum value (24.7%) at 2 h. Therefore, 160 °C and 2 h were chosen as the optimal reaction temperature and time.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Effects of reaction time and temperature on the yield of LaA (a) and the conversion rate of Pueraria cellulose (b) were studied. Reaction conditions: Pueraria cellulose, 50 mg; catalyst, 50 mg; water, 10 mL; 600 rpm

Effect of catalyst dosage on catalytic performance

After determining the optimal reaction time and temperature, the effect of catalyst dosage on the hydrolysis products of Pueraria cellulose was investigated, as shown in Fig. 8. It can be observed that with increasing catalyst dosage, the LaA yield first increases and then decreases. When the catalyst dosage was less than 0.05 g, some soluble oligosaccharides in the reaction system were not completely converted during the cellulose depolymerization process, leading to a lower LaA yield. When the catalyst dosage was 0.05 g, the LaA yield reaches the highest value of 24.7%. A higher concentration of active sites may aid to promote additional polymerization of LaA and form soluble polymers, humus, and unwanted by-products, which causes a drop in LaA yield when the catalyst dosage is increased further (Dong et al. 2022a). Table 4 provides a summary of some of the heterogeneous catalysts used to convert cellulose into LaA. Despite having higher LaA outputs than other metals, rare earth metals are pricey and unsuitable for industrial use. In comparison to these results, our catalyst delivered acceptable LaA yields during cellulose conversion at lower temperatures and in less time.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Effect of catalyst dosage on the yield of LaA from Pueraria cellulose. Reaction conditions: Pueraria cellulose, 50 mg; water, 10 mL;160 °C; 2 h, 600 rpm

Table 4 Summary of heterogeneous catalysts for the conversion of biomass to LaA

Effect of reaction solvent on catalytic reaction

In exploring the effect of reaction solvent on LaA selectivity (Fig. 9), it was found that using wholesome and non-toxic water as the reaction solvent resulted in the highest yield. This is because using water as the reaction solvent allows more cellulose molecules to enter the catalyst to undergo hydrolysis with hydrogen ions, isomerization and other chemical reactions to increase the yield of LaA.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Effect of reaction solvent on the conversion of Pueraria cellulose to LaA. Reaction conditions: Pueraria cellulose, 50 mg; catalyst, 50 mg; 160 °C; 2 h, 600 rpm

Applied to the conversion of other carbohydrates

The catalyst was applied to the conversion of other carbohydrates (Fig. 10) and it was found that the conversion of fructose to LaA resulted in a higher yield than that of glucose to LaA. This is due to the fact that aldose glucose is first isomerized during the process to create ketose fructose (Kupila et al. 2021), which requires the consumption of some heat. Sucrose is formed by the condensation of one molecule of glucose and one molecule of fructose, and the yield of LaA prepared from sucrose as a raw material is between the two. The yield of starch to LaA (29%) was found to be higher than the yield of Pueraria cellulose to LaA. This is due to the β-1,4 glycosidic linkage connecting the glucose monomer in cellulose, which are more challenging to hydrolyze than the α-1,4 glycosidic linkage in starch. Xylose (C5 sugar) has a simpler structure than Pueraria cellulose and can be converted to LaA more easily. LaA was generated by xylose at a rate of 30.74%.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Applied to the conversion of other carbohydrates to LaA. Reaction conditions: carbohydrates, 50 mg; catalyst, 50 mg; water, 10 mL; 160 °C; 2 h, 600 rpm

Conclusions

In this study, lignin-based carbonaceous carriers (LCSA) were prepared by a one-step sulfonation-carbonization method using chlorosulfonic acid. The effect of aluminum or zinc-containing catalysts supported on the prepared LCSA on the conversion of Pueraria cellulose to LaA was investigated. The results showed that the prepared lignin carbon-based solid acids could effectively catalyze the conversion of Pueraria cellulose to LaA. The addition of aluminum was more favorable than zinc for obtaining a higher yield of LaA. LCSA–Al exhibited the best catalytic performance. LCSA–Al had Lewis acid and Brønsted acid sites, with fewer weak acid sites and more strong acid sites. At 160 °C, with 50 mg of Pueraria cellulose, 50 mg of catalyst and 10 mL of deionized water, the conversion rate of Pueraria cellulose was 53.7% and the yield of LaA was 24.7%. In addition to providing a chemical pathway for the transformation of related carbohydrates, this work develops a new approach for the future conversion of cellulose to LaA.