Abstract
As PCR methods have improved over the last 15 years, there has been an upsurge in the number of new DNA marker tools, which has allowed the generation of high-density molecular maps for all the key Brassica crop types. Biotechnology and molecular plant breeding have emerged as a significant tool for molecular understanding that led to a significant crop improvement in the Brassica napus species. Brassica napus possess a very complicated polyploidy-based genomics. The quantitative trait locus (QTL) is not sufficient to develop effective markers for trait introgression. In the coming years, the molecular marker techniques will be more effective to determine the whole genome impairing desired traits. Available genetic markers using the single-nucleotide sequence (SNP) technique and high-throughput sequencing are effective in determining the maps and genome polymorphisms amongst candidate genes and allele interactions. High-throughput sequencing and gene mapping techniques are involved in discovering new alleles and gene pairs, serving as a bridge between the gene map and genome evaluation. The decreasing cost for DNA sequencing will help in discovering full genome sequences with less resources and time. This review describes (1) the current use of integrated approaches, such as molecular marker technologies, to determine genome arrangements and interspecific outcomes combined with cost-effective genomes to increase the efficiency in prognostic breeding efforts. (2) It also focused on functional genomics, proteomics and field-based breeding practices to achieve insight into the genetics underlying both simple and complex traits in canola.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Canola is the second most important crop and source of vegetable oil in the world (Starner et al. 1999). Therefore, it plays a considerable role in global food security from the prospective of growing populations (Shahin and Valiollah 2009). Brassica has approximately 100 species, including B. napus, spp. oleifera, commonly known as rapeseed, canola and oilseed rape (Rieger et al. 2001). Canola refers to those varieties of B. napus that meet a specific limit of erucic acid (< 2% in oil) and glucosinolates (30 μmol/g in toasted oil-free meal).
The canola crop gives more output and returns in the farming community compared to pulses (Norton et al. 1999). With the introduction of hybrid varieties in the farming community, canola production has been enhanced under normal and poor soil conditions, and net returns and share in the GDP have increased (Brandt et al. 2007). In the hybrid development of Brassica, the primary obstacle is to determine the best combination from different cultivars for heterosis, good seed yield and genetic variation. Thus, genetic variation does not always linearly correlate with heterosis. There was a considerable improvement in total additive and non-additive genetic value when seed yield and oil contents were considered in pedigree selection with GE (Genetics × Environments) (Beeck et al. 2010).
In a B. napus breeding programme, numerous molecular markers are directly linked with agro-morphological traits, and some of them have been successfully assimilated for marker-assisted selection (MAS), but for quantitative traits, the programme has not yielded satisfactory results. QTL population mapping is not necessarily transferable by molecular markers because flanking distance between the markers is very large. Therefore, integrated approaches are inevitable for canola improvement to collect field trial data along with QTL mapping and constructing a linkage map to find good allele and gene pairs involved for high yield within existing genetic resources. Application of molecular markers for Brassica development has an enormous challenge to figure out the gene of interest and allied lines used for sustainable agricultural programmes. To implement all the breeding and molecular tools for genomic selection in Brassica oilseed crops, a possible approach is using genome by single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers under a next-generation sequencing platform for effective screening. The present review discusses integrated approaches, such as molecular markers technologies, used to determine genome arrangements and interspecific outcomes crossed with cost-effective genomes in order to increase the efficiency in prognostic breeding efforts. We also discuss modern breeding with an updated synthetic view of how functional genomics, proteomics and field-based breeding practices can effectively improve canola productivity for global needs as well as for sustainable agriculture.
Yield restrictions
In the early 1990s, different legislation was enacted by authorities to regulate Brassica production in the world. The purpose of this legislation was to minimize the cross-pollination conflicts amongst vegetable seed growers, while seed companies producing these important crops (Gulden et al. 2009) acquired increased fuel prices and excellent adaptations of canola amongst growers. The seed yield of any crop is an important but complex characteristic of studies controlled by different alleles, making it possible to identify the right allelic interaction between crop plants (Rehman 2013). Over the last few decades, there has been a dramatic increase in the biology and chemistry of nucleic acids. It is now possible to isolate the genes of interest and determine their structures by breeding, DNA extraction techniques, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), molecular markers and genetic analysers to determine the desired gene available for canola production (Warwick 2000).
Breeding
The development of genetic diversity-focused crop breeding is a good technique for improving yield and developing resistant varieties against biotic (pest and disease) and abiotic stresses. Their success will depend upon the combined used of genetic engineering and traditional breeding goals (Fahad et al. 2014; Noman et al. 2017). Previously, several millennium crops have been improved regarding quality, resistance against pests and diseases, and higher yield traits. Breeding involved hybridization by selection of the segregated progeny for particular traits of interest. Several modifications have been made in agricultural practices, for instance, increased fertilizer dose for better growth as well as development and introduction of selective herbicides, fungicides and pesticides. Crop composition can be modified by crops grown with high output value (Brandt et al. 2007).
Traditional breeding practices
Ever since the beginnings of the domestication of plants some 10,000 years ago, plant breeding has been particularly effective in developing crops and varieties that have contributed to the development of modern societies. Plant breeding technology has developed from genetics, but crop improvement depends on identification of particular traits required for achieving high-profile features, especially on oil quality, yield and resistance against pests and diseases. Moreover, success in breeding also depends on an understanding of plant physiology, pathology and biochemistry of the specific crop. A number of genes or alleles, present at a specific locus, have different interactions with their function in plants. Traditional plant breeding is concerned mainly with the directed re-assortment of the allelic variants to produce allele combinations suitable for genotypes assumed to be the best in specific environmental conditions. Embryo rupture and ovule culture methods have been employed to enhance the species value by transferring the disease resistance that could be sexually hybridized with oilseed rape. The black leg (Phoma lingam) disease resistance was introduced to B. juncea and B. napus using embryo culture to increase the survival of the hybrid with backcross, along with reducing the generation time. The hybrids developed, however, gave important information about DNA behaviour and pairing between weak homologous genomes and loci with various allelic interactions that are relatively easy to manipulate by crossing and selecting for a specific condition (Nelson et al. 2004). Molecular marker technology is used to compute the traits and allelic interactions for genetic diversity (Gupta 2006). It could also be helpful in determining the loci number involved in yield, seed weight, seed colour and their shape that could differ from other species. Likewise, the recent integration of advances in biotechnology, such as genomic study, and molecular marker applications with conventional plant breeding practices has opened the basis for molecular plant breeding, a multidisciplinary science that is reforming twenty-first century crop improvement.
The methods of molecular plant breeding are of great interest amongst plant breeders and crop scientists (Varshney et al. 2007). Figure 1 depicts a framework for crossing with different allelic interactions. Brassica lines were produced from substitutes of three different genomes, A, B and C (A = natural Brassica; B = Brassica napa; C = Brassica carinata). Approximately 16% of self-pollinated offsprings carry 38 chromosomes, whilst the rest of progenies lack the B genome sequence. It has also been reported that B genome chromosomes were easily eliminated during self-pollination (Xiao et al. 2010).
Many elite varieties contain different detrimental alleles. A rigorous and frequent breeding cycle is required to remove the hazardous effects and ultimately discover a new variety adapted to a new environment. To achieve finding elite lines with good characteristics, many constraints associated with interspecific crosses must be overcome. Several comparative studies, to test combinations from different lines, have demonstrated that crosses of canola lines with interspecific hybrids of canola and B. rapa species increased the seed yield of canola by almost 90% (Xiao et al. 2010).
Breeding improvements and genetic potential
Several breeding modifications for enhancing the yield and oil qualities of the canola crop have been documented by numerous researchers and scientists. Amongst the Brassica relatives, Sinapis arvensis (wild mustard) is the most common weedy plant in the world. The interspecific crossing between B. juncea × S. arvensis backcrossed with B. Juncea × S. arvensis (Bing et al. 1991) resulted in weak and sterile plants that had no seed production. This cross would not be the result of a natural transfer where the inserted traits into the species are stable. Weed species from the Brassicaceae family, such as Raphanus raphanistrum (wild radish) and Erucastrum gallicum (dog mustard), are locally quite abundant and were hybridized with canola as a female parent (Gupta 2006). B. napus × R. raphanistrum cross results showed that F1 hybrids have fertile pollen (0–65.4%) with a low number of F2 progeny (Rieger et al. 2001), while hybrids resulting from the D. muralis × B. napus and D. erucoides × B. napus crosses have sterile males (Ringdahl et al. 1987).
Improvements in breeding technology can be considered under several categories such as (1) alien genotypes, (2) high precision and speed of selection, (3) breeding system modification, (4) reduced generation time, and (5) an improved and more precise definition of breeding objectives.
Alien genotypes
Alien variation is a sexual hybridization method introduced in crop plants. Different procedures are being used to overcome the natural hybridization, as some species of Vicia faba cannot be related to the hybrid species production. The desired traits could be transferred by selection and a repeated backcross. The repeated backcross method is successful only when detectable gene(s) or allele(s) are easy to transfer and there is a presence of a limited number of genes in the species that can be irradiated or transferred by pollen grain in random order (Warwick 2005). The quantitative characteristics cannot be easily recognized in genomic segments. Two-parent families derived from cross-genetic mapping of candidate genes combine with the family and population genetic analysis for disequilibrium, which strengthen the power of the top QTL to discover more gene(s) in the future for canola improvement (Yu et al. 2008) (Fig. 2). QTL mapping simplifies the analysis value involved for the growth of population exchange with genetic causality established in a single gene (Harjes et al. 2008). In plant breeding technologies, double haploid or F2 populations were derived from a cross of two inbred lines. An F1 single-genotype individual contains segregating materials; so that association between loci can be predicted based on the mapping distance. In this way, we can generally get a low resolution of QTL localization. The accuracy of the QTL localization can be improved when larger numbers of meiotic events are measured. The value of the recombination frequency will be greatly undervalued between any QTL and its surrounding regions, as the inbred lines are more active for fine mapping of the QTL(s) (Snowdon and Friedt 2004).
Molecular markers are used to scan the genomes for the selection of individuals containing favourable alleles and transgenes by recurrent selection. Genomics, plant biotechnology and molecular marker application established new ideas, analyses and genetic variations for the development of improved varieties (Collard and Mackill, 2008). QTL history mapping related to agronomy and nutritional characteristics are reported in oilseed crops to evaluate various SNPs sequences, particularly QTL target genomes (Basunanda et al. 2010). Meta-QTL trait genomes are highly interesting for determining the specific target regions important for diversity. Hybridization-based sequence techniques were derived to determine the target genomes by resequencing (Albert et al. 2007) and discover SNPs in canola (Pichon and colleagues conference presentation: http://www.intl-pag.org/18/abstracts/W92_PAGXVIII_643.html). Sequence-captured technologies for polyploidy crops such as canola, in which homologous target loci exhibit imprisonment, can be fixed by inter-locus polymorphism later on (Albert et al. 2007).
High precision and selection speed
Plant phenotypic growth characteristics depend on the choice of traditional historical background. In some cases, visual interest is removed to reveal the nature of the organ. Plant phenotypic characteristics are affected by (G × E) interactions by measuring the error difference and allowing the breeder to find characteristics for crop improvement (Warwick 2005). In the future, it may be possible to identify individual alleles by a DNA product and antibodies probe. Integrated plant breeding approaches decrease the costs of selection and time. The process involved physiological and biochemical characteristics to determine the phenotypic efficiency through strong genetic correlation and high genetic diversity amongst the cultivars. Sequence DNA tags and molecular marker genomic approaches are considered for the selection of phenotypic characteristics, especially for environment indices (Jansen and siesta 2001). Marker-assisted selection strategies are used to accelerate the spread of transgenes in commercial cultivars, which was obtained by backcrossing (Tuberosa et al. 2007). However, in the future, drought tolerance or nutrients might be the main limiting factors for the canola crop. Biotechnological tools provide genetic background information for gene expression to optimize genetic potential for crop improvement. Transgenic modification may alter the phenotype of the individual selected through environment selection.
Breeding systems modification
Breeders adopt various strategies from plant reproductive systems to develop new varieties (Collard and Mackill 2008). These strategies include self-compatibility (movement of pollen amongst flowers of the same plant), where insects facilitate pollination within the flower, and in herkogamous species, where insects move pollen between distanced flower parts, making it more vulnerable to differentiate from autonomous self-pollination (automatically a flower without a pollinator). The selection of a particular strategy largely depends upon good genetic architecture, a self-compatible habitat and homozygous compatibility achieved by the self-pollination process (Howlett 2004).
Gene transfer by self-pollination means more of the genes associated with the desired traits will be transferred. Some traits are not identified by molecular biology, and these are directly involved with self- or cross-pollination. Incompatibility at the molecular basis is not well understood, and more research must be done on the system to determine the desired traits. Literature has reported that self-incompatibility blocks self-pollination at specific stages such as pollination, fertilization and the seed maturation stage. Therefore, self-incompatibility not only aids in finding the genetic information for specific traits, but also enables the gene(s) to transfer at a specific level in the crop (Sivasithamparam et al. 2005).
Reduced generation time
The maximum potential for genetic gain is proportional to the phenotypic variation present in the original source, and subsequent cycles of selection remain proportional to the environmental factors. Phenotypic variation is positively associated with genetic diversity, but at the same time, environmental factors and interactions between genotype and environment also mainly depend on the phenotyping. Alien substances that do not adapt to the environment between the natural crosses or induced mutation lead to the introduction of transgenic events, or combinations of these sources can be derived from the crosses of segregated progeny. In many crops, such as wheat or canola, farmers might be able to reduce the life cycle of the plants.
Figure 3 reveals the generation cycle related to genetic gain, phenotypic variability and length of the generation for a variety. Large genetic correlation and genotypic selection, instead of phenotypic selection during the life cycle, make it possible to reduce the cycle times, while the bad use of phenotyping selection can achieve additional savings in nurseries by combining the scores of phenotypic data and molecular markers. GE interaction has positive effects on oil contents in diploid species. Oil contents of the rape species are controlled by the embryo and cytoplasm, while GE controls the maternal genetic effect, whereas the embryo and cytoplasm play the main role behind the scenes (Wu et al. 2006). Plant yield is dependent on yield components.
Improved and precise breeding goals
Improved and precise breeding goals are more important for canola crop improvement because otherwise it is more difficult to obtain the desired goals. Molecular biology is involved in controlling the growth and development of any studied crop. Some yield traits are directly involved with molecular biology and can be explored by some application processes. Qualitative and quantitative effects are important when numbers of genes are known, but financial issues hinder the process to adopt a programme in order to recognize those gene pairs controlling the traits. In general, the commercial adoption of new techniques depends on economic conditions. For conventional plant breeding, selection based on phenotype alone has been effective historically.
Molecular biology and canola improvement
Yield and crop quality
Brassica is a member of the intermediate C3–C4 photosynthetic carbon metabolism, and the presence of chloroplasts and mitochondria in its leaf sheath cell tissue indicates the presence of phosphoenol pyruvate (PEP) carboxylase activity. C3 and C4 species have an intermediate carbon dioxide compensation point (Yu et al. 2008). This feature can be useful for rape improvement because of photorespiration, which causes a reduction in net photosynthesis, and thus the crop can withstand low light availability and harsh environmental conditions. In rape, the recipient’s homologous genes are turned off or eliminated compared to wheat crops, where they are more affected.
It is more important for genes to disappear in the host cell at the right time, and particularly in the exact cell in the correct amount, they play a significant role if proven effective but are expensive (Nelson et al. 2007). A gene’s resistance against herbicides would also helpful for a breeding programme. Herbicide weed control was successful in cereals, so it is possible to identify their desirable genes and transfer them into canola crop for resistance against herbicides. Microorganisms are an alternative source of resistance, which might offer possible utilization for transfer to the genes. Many desirable genes and alleles are available for scientists and researchers with an opportunity to exploit the hybrid. If we find the specific gene or gene sequence, then there is a possibility that a desired gene could be transformed for improving yield and oil quality in canola.
Marker-assisted selection (molecular markers) techniques for B. napus
It is a general consensus amongst breeders and researchers that genetic diversity exists in spring canola for a breeding programme. Amongst the canola gene pool, genetic diversity determined by molecular marker techniques (used for clearly distinct canola species) has also been preserved for future use, and these gene pools could be used for canola genome improvement. Unadopted canola germplasm in spring canola breeding could be challenged by the introduction of negative traits/alleles from exotic germplasms in spring canola and would require repeated breeding cycles for crop improvement. The elite species needed for a breeding programme have more problems associated with interspecific hybrid production and introduction of unwanted allele’s linkage drag and hybrid sterility. Allelic interactions amongst improved canola with exotic varieties for the improvement of seed yield and other traits are being investigated in open-pollinated and hybrid cultivars with encouraging results (Rehman 2013).
Molecular markers, used for genome sequencing and characterizing the genetic material from the gene pool, are present in all crops. Some efforts have been made to increase the knowledge about genetic diversity and their future uses for a crop improvement programme. The alleles and nucleotide sequence confirmed by molecular markers provide basic information about genetic diversity from wild ancestors and elite varieties geographically distributed over a wide range that have had their germplasm materials conserved in the gene bank for future use (Buckler et al. 2006). Parental mating detection is used to identify the traits that are involved in QTL, while genomic selection has been proposed to identify these deficiencies so breeding lines are used to determine the phenotypes by molecular marker scores in the population. Some selected important traits are described in Table 1, where genetic markers are used for mapping loci in canola. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), simple sequence repeat (SSR), and RAPD primers are used to determine the genetic diversity present in the canola crop (Jesske et al. 2011). High allelic diversity is present amongst winter fodder and vegetable types of the Brassica species (Hasan et al. 2006). Chinese spring canola has showed greater genetic diversity from Swedish spring canola when SSR markers were applied. Thus, improvements can be made with the use of non-oil seed with oil seed types of canola (Zhou et al. 2006). More than 80 spring and winter canola varieties from 18 breeders showed grouping towards cultivars from the same breeder using the AFLP marker system. Hence, genetic variation determined by molecular markers will deliver pedigree information towards a gene pool in the breeding system (Hu et al. 2007). Genetic diversity for B. napus grown in specific environmental conditions cannot be passable for permanent improvement for the long term (Hasan et al. 2006).
Molecular biology and disease resistance
Understanding the molecular mechanism against gene resistance is associated with (a) the need for research and (b) research to improve disease resistance in crop plants. There are some necessary things that could be identified; (i) disease-resistant sources (ii) the transfer of resistant genes and (iii) monitoring and evaluation of their activity in the presence of resistant genes. In general, current breeding methods and their selection can be achieved with regular screening for these traits but with varying degrees of success and often only after prolonged effort (Fahad et al. 2014). The chemical fungicides used to control diseases have negative effects on human health and the environment. Therefore, to manage this problem, new strategies were adopted. The constant use of fungicides has developed resistance to pathogens strains. Bio-control is an alternate viable way to suppress diseases using microorganisms in order to improve plant health and growth and thus increase the canola yield and its oil quality.
Sequence-based techniques for Brassica improvement
Brassica species have greater competition in commercial breeding and consumer demands due to NGS (Next-generation sequencing)-based technology. There is a constantly increasing demand for new varieties from breeders to seek low input for target regions that are directly linked with agronomical and nutritional traits (Collard and Mackill 2008). In 2003, Brassica genomes were sequenced for the first time at a smaller scale with less intricate genomes with two diploid progenitor genomes of canola (Snowdown et al. 2012). Applications of peak next-generation DNA sequencing methodologies have a greater impact on a massive platform in genetics. New DNA-based technologies mainly focus on genome analysis at a greater scale with fine-tuned resolution to obtain single-base accuracy. In modern times, RNA sequences with full-length cDNA analysis, as well as non-coding RNA technologies, are now being developed.
Next-generation sequencing would also help with basic fundamental biological work for a full canola genome sequencing as well as with future concerns of the breeder (Margulies et al. 2005). It will also help in identifying novel genes derived from pre-historic DNA sequences as well as significantly increase the scope of Meta-genomic analysis derived from the environment. Integrated approaches of these technologies have a dramatic change in genetic and biological research. High-throughput screening needs discoveries in SNP (single-nucleotide polymorphism) for all major and minor crops. This technique has been tested in many crops with more or less complex genomes, i.e. canola. Data regarding whole genomes have been financially feasible for reading sequencing of ESTs (expressed sequenced tags) (Parkin et al. 2010), 454 amplicon sequences (Gholami et al. 2012), transcriptome profiling (Bancroft et al. 2011), or array-based techniques, which have been established for mid- to large-scale SNP discoveries for canola lines. Polymorphism and chromosome re-arrangement will help offer a comprehensive description of early and ancient species of B. napus.
Sequential differentiation and transcriptome abundance allow the scientist to construct a genetic map of twin single-nucleotide polymorphisms against canola and B. napus genomes with its ancestors. There is a dire need to develop a mechanism for tracking the rearrangements and inheritance for completely genomic segments. This technique is cost-effective for a canola breeding crop improvement programme to determine the crop genomes by a transcriptome sequence, consequently increasing the predictive efficiency of the breeding programmes (Bancroft et al. 2011). Expression analysis techniques are being used to determine the redundant transcriptome in allo-tetrapoloid genomes of canola, preserving multiple copies of the genes. Canola genomes are closely related to the main diploid Brassica species evolved from a hexaploid. Expressed sequenced tags were used to determine the differentiated sets of the transcriptome and the efficacy of identifying the distinguished transcriptome in canola using microarray hybridization. Microarrays did not identify the distinguished transcript that was closely homologous related while expressed differentially towards unique transcripts. Gene expression in polyploidy canola species should be transformed to next-generation sequencing, which is cost-effective in obtaining millions of sequenced tags for whole canola genomes. Triplicate genome segments of B. oleracea spp. are paralogous with each other and segmentally duplicated with Arabidopsis thaliana genomes. Synonymous analysis-based substitution predicted that the triplicate Brassica segments diverged from a common ancestor after divergence with Arabidopsis and Brassica lineage.
Genome triplication inferred 35% of the gene occurred in Brassica lineage by loss or deletion of the mechanism. Gene encoding in a single transduction or transcriptase was not found to significantly retain those encoding proteins classified with other functions (Town et al. 2006). Sanger sequenced-based technologies with NGS data were assembled, and a press release occurred in August 2011. The data regarding complete, ongoing planned projects for sequencing and resequencing in B. napus are presented in Table 2. The countries involved during this consortium for assembling sequenced data genomes for B. Oleracea and B. napus are China, North America, Australia and Europe. The whole genome of canola was already publicly released in 2009 by Bayer Crop Science (http://tinyurl.com/28cbe6v) (Snowdown et al. 2012). Research reported on the cost per basis of genomes revealed that cost per base genomes was reduced by one-ninth compared to conventional sequence methods.
A linear decrease in the cost of conventional Sanger sequenced analysis techniques compared with commercialization of NGS for per base sequencing prices for the last few years is shown in Fig. 4. It is evident from Fig. 4 that the cost for sequencing continuously decreases every 2 years, indicating that a clear picture would predict canola chromosome structure variation and DNA sequence variation emerging for a single run of only a few thousand dollars per genomes. By this, we can imagine that we can also judge the polyploidy nature of the canola genome origin and novel features of the crop plant and make it beneficial for breeding purposes (Snowdown et al. 2012).
Proteomics analysis
Ultrastructural protein analysis (proteomic and genomic) revealed that the matured seed of canola had wide ranges of oil contents (36.49–55.19%). The results further predicted that oil bodies are closer in high range rather than in the low oil content line, and these differences depend upon the thickness of the cell wall and cell size. In all, 119 and 32 differentially expressed proteins from total and oil body protein were determined, respectively. QTL mapping analysis for oil contents confirmed that some genes were involved in differentially expressed protein profiles. The function of genes that were involved in coded storage expressed proteins that were examined by analysing full-length cDNA from canola seeds (Gan et al. 2013).
Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis was also used to determine the seed protein structure in Brassica genomes. Developmental expression protein spots (794) were found, and hierarchal clustering analysis was used to find 12 expression trends that were based on Arabidopsis functional schemes. Energy- and metabolism-related proteins were more represented in developing seed, accounting for 24.3 and 16.8%, respectively, of the total proteins (Hajduch et al. 2006).
A biosynthetic pathway was responsible for the accumulation and storage of protein in canola seed (Goffman et al. 2005). Canola embryos revealed that rubisco acts without a Calvin cycle to increase the carbon efficiency during triacylglycerol production (Schwender et al. 2004). Until now, limited information has been available for protein regulation during seed development, i.e. translation and posttranslational pathways for protein regulation. Many gene-encoding enzymes are involved in controlling the seed-filling process for respective pathways (Goffman et al. 2005). cDNA sequencing techniques provide relevant information about the canola genomes for high-throughput genomic technologies, i.e. proteomics expression gene profiling at the mRNA and gene level. Arabidopsis presents an opportunity for this type of genome profiling for seed development programmes (Aebersold and Mann 2003).
Functional genomics
Functional genomics is an important part of the plant genome that plays a great role in the research leading to crop improvement. Mutant function is a good source that provides valuable information for gene regulation metabolic activity development and chemical that can be used in reference plants, i.e. Arabidopsis thaliana (Long et al. 1993). Targeting induced local lesions in genomes (TILLING) is a more efficient genetic approach in the modern era and is being applied in a reference plant (Arabidopsis). TILLING is a screening type of analysis technique, in which the plant population is treated with mutated reference plants, causing point mutation followed by desired gene discovery from the population. This screening collects a series of allelic mutants with varying function. DNA samples that are used during mutational screening from self-fertilization are further used for downstream screening (Henikoff et al. 2004) based on an enzyme with a singleton DNA. Chemical mutants are used to induce the genome cut randomly easy to make larger mutant populations at all gene loci. This technique is also helpful for inducing mutation in all desired genes for all crop plants. It was also reported that duplicate genomes are easier to induce mutation checked by paralogue sets of genes. The canola genome is more complex, with the ability to induce mutants easier than others (Town et al. 2006).
Plant mapping is a powerful tool to determine the processes of genome evolution and genetic resource materials transfer between the species. In the last few decades, comparative mapping has been used against some grasses, i.e. monocot rice (Lukens et al. 2004). The canola genome was mapped with 1000 genetically linked loci at homologous positions with similar sequences. Chromosome conservation at the centromere position occurs within two species, representing that the Brassica diploid species was eluted from hexaploid species. Endosperm is the main part of the seed that transfers nutrients from parental plants to the embryo. Endosperm has a greater impression of the seed phenotype and genetic variation, while maternal testa affects the zygotic endosperm (Penfield et al. 2004). Gene mapping and microarray datasets determine the basic genomes by dissecting the endosperm and collecting EST for canola improvement. Endosperm analysis with gene expression and metabolic processes provide new gates of research for further improvements in the canola genome.
Summary and future prospects
Recent advances and development in molecular plant breeding provide pivotal assistance in current efforts to find gene pairs that lead to significant crop improvements in canola. Genetic variations in canola species for winter and spring must be extended to enhance the productivity as well as biodiversity of crop plants. The Brassica gene pool might be extendable for unadopted as well as allied species for a long-term perspective, where multiple gene pair allelic interactions with right combinations are involved to obtain maximum productivity. From this prospective, molecular marker techniques are powerful tools in molecular biology to determine variations at the polyploidy level. Moreover, we can obtain the sequence of the whole Brassica genome and help to identify the novel genes that are involved for contributing or controlling the seed yield through agronomic and seed quality traits in advanced breeding technologies. Brassica EST development, along with sequencing techniques for Brassica genomes, is helpful for constructing physical maps to assist in determining the SNPs for a large number of agronomical QTL(s) and candidate genes in the future. High-throughput sequence technology with cost-effective molecular marker techniques is expected to create a new impetus for new canola variety development. The advancement of new technologies and discoveries in molecular biology techniques will benefit all communities. Integrated approaches, such as DNA chip and high-throughput sequencing genotyping studies, provide enough information for the molecular genetics of the Brassica crop. Arabidopsis is a closely related relative and model plant, which can be used to obtain new information and breeding technologies for plant improvement in the Brassica genome. Integrated advanced breeding approaches provide much information; however, a huge gap still exists regarding drought and gene action for canola improvement.
References
Aebersold R, Mann M (2003) Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422:198–207
Akibode S, Maredia M (2011) Global and regional trends in production trade and consumption of food legume crops. Department of Agricultural Food and Resource Economics Michigan State University: 87
Albert TJ, Molla MN, Muzny DM, Nazareth L, Wheeler D, Song X, Richmond TA, Middle CM, Rodesch MJ, Charles J, Packard CJ, Weinstock GM, Gibbs RA (2007) Direct selection of human genomic loci by microarray hybridization. Nat Methods 4:903–905
Allender CJ, King GJ (2010) Origins of the amphiploid species Brassica napus L. investigated by chloroplast and nuclear molecular markers. BMC Plant Biol 10:54
Austin RB, Flavell RB, Henson IE, Lowe HJB (1986) Molecular biology and crop improvement: a case study of wheat oilseed rape and faba beans. Aus Ann Bot 96:363–377
Bancroft IC, Morgan F, Fraser J, Higgins R, Wells L, Clissold D, Baker Y, Long J, Meng X, Wang S, Trick LM (2011) Dissecting the genome of the polyploidy crop oilseed rape by transcriptome sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 29:762–766
Barret P, Delourme R, Foisset N, Renard M (1998) Development of a SCAR (sequence characterised amplified region) marker for molecular tagging of the dwarf breizh (Bzh) gene in Brassica napus L. Theor Appl Genet 97:828–833
Basunanda PM, Radoev W, Ecke W, Friedt H, Becker C, Snowdon RJ (2010) Comparative mapping of quantitative trait loci involved in heterosis for seedling and yield traits in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Theor Appl Genet 120:271–281
Beeck C, Cowling W, Smith A, Cullis BR (2010) Analysis of yield and oil from a series of canola breeding trials. Part I. Fitting factor analytic mixed models with pedigree information This article is one of a selection of papers from the conference “Exploiting Genome-wide Association in Oilseed Brassicas: a model for genetic improvement of major OECD crops for sustainable farming”. Genome 53:992–1001
Berger J, Milroy S, Turner N, Siddique K, Imtiaz M, Malhotra R (2011) Chickpea evolution has selected for contrasting phonological mechanisms among different habitats. Euphytica 180:1–15
Bing DJ, Downey RK, Rakow GFW (1991) Potential of gene transfer among oilseed Brassica and their weedy relatives. GCIRC Congress: 1022–1027
Brandt S, Malhi S, Ulrich D, Lafond G, Kutcher H, Johnston A (2007) Seeding rate, fertilizer level and disease management effects on hybrid versus open pollinated canola (Brassica napus L.). Can J Plant Sci 87:255–266
Brown GG, Formanová N, Wargachuk JH, Dendy RC, Patil P, Laforest M, Zhang J, Cheung WY, Landry BS (2003) The radish Rfo restorer gene of Ogura cytoplasmic male sterility encodes a protein with multiple pentatricopeptide repeats. Plant J 35:262–272
Buckler ES, Gaut BS, McMullen MD (2006) Molecular and functional diversity of maize. Curr Opini Plant Biol 9:172–176
Collard BC, Mackill DJ (2008) Marker-assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century. Philos Trans Royal Soc B 363:557–572
Collier MJ, Mullins E (2012) Assessing the Impact of Pollen-mediated Gene Flow from GM Herbicide Tolerant Brassica Napus into Common Wild Relatives in Ireland Biology & Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. The Royal Irish Academy, pp. 257–266
Das S, Roscoe T, Delseny M, Srivastava P, Lakshmikumaran M (2002) Cloning and molecular characterization of the Fatty Acid Elongase 1 (FAE 1) gene from high and low erucic acid lines of Brassica campestris and Brassica oleracea. Plant Sci 162:245–250
Fahad S, Nie L, Khan FA, Chen Y, Hussain S, Wu C et al (2014) Disease resistance in rice and the role of molecular breeding in protecting rice crops against diseases. Biotechnol Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-014-1510-9
Ferreira M, Williams P, Osborn T (1995) Mapping of a locus controlling resistance to Albugo candida in Brassica napus using molecular markers. Phytopathol 85:218–220
Fray M, Puangsomlee P, Goodrich J, Coupland G, Evans E, Arthur A, Lydiate D (1997) The genetics of stamenoid petal production in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and equivalent variation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Theor Appl Genet 94:731–736
Gan L, Zhang CY, Wang XD, Wang H, Long Y, Yin Y, Li DR, Tian J, Li ZHY, Lin ZW (2013) Proteomic and comparative genomic analysis of two Brassica napus lines differing in oil content. J Proteome Res 12:4965–4978
Gholami M, Bekele WA, Schondelmaier J, Snowdon RJ (2012) A tailed PCR procedure for cost-effective two-order multiplex sequencing of candidate genes in polyploid plants. J Plant Biotechnol 10:635–645
Goffman FD, Alonso AP, Schwender J, Shachar-Hill Y, Ohlrogge JB (2005) Light enables a very high efficiency of carbon storage in developing embryos of rapeseed. Plant Physiol 138:2269–2279
Gulden RH, Shirtliffe SJ, Thomas AG (2009) Harvest losses of canola (Brassica napus) cause large seedbank inputs. Weed Sci 51:83–86
Gupta K, Prem D, Nashaat N, Agnihotri A (2006) Response of interspecific Brassica juncea/Brassica rapa hybrids and their advanced progenies to Albugo candida (white blister). Plant Pathol J 55:679–689
Hajduch M, Casteel JE, Hurrelmeyer KE, Song Z, Agrawal GK, Thelen JJ (2006) Proteomic analysis of seed filling in Brassica napus. Developmental characterization of metabolic isozymes using high-resolution two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Plant Physiol 141:32–46
Harjes CE, Rocheford TR, Bai L, Brutnell TP, Kandianis CB, Sowinski SG, Stapleton AE, Vallabhaneni R, Williams M, Wurtzel ET (2008) Natural genetic variation in lycopene epsilon cyclase tapped for maize bio fortification. Science 319:330–333
Hasan M, Seyis F, Badani A, Pons-Kühnemann J, Friedt W, Lühs W, Snowdon R (2006) Analysis of genetic diversity in the Brassica napus L. gene pool using SSR markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:793–802
Heffner EL, Sorrells ME, Jannink JL (2009) Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci 49:1–12
Heidarvand L, Amiri RM, Naghavi MR, Farayedi Y, Sadeghzadeh B, Alizadeh K (2011) Physiological and morphological characteristics of chickpea accessions under low temperature stress. Russian J Plant Physiol 58:157–163
Henikoff S, Furuyama T, Ahmad K (2004) Histone variants, nucleosome assembly and epigenetic inheritance. Trends Genet 20:320–326
Horst L, Wenzel G (2007) Molecular marker systems in plant breeding and crop improvement 55. Springer
Howell P, Sharpe A, Lydiate D (2003) Homoeologous loci control the accumulation of seed glucosinolates in oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Genome 46:454–460
Howlett BJ (2004) Current knowledge of the interaction between Brassica napus and Leptosphaeria maculans. Canad J Plant Pathol 26:245–252
Hu J, Quiros C, Arus P, Strass D, Robbelen G (1995) Mapping of a gene determining linolenic acid concentration in rapeseed with DNA-based markers. Theor Appl Genet 90:258–262
Hu J, Li G, Struss D, Quiros C (1999) SCAR and RAPD markers associated with 18-carbon fatty acids in rapeseed Brassica napus. Plant Breed J 118:145–150
Hu S, Yu C, Zhao H, Sun G, Zhao S, Vyvadilova M, Kucera V (2007) Genetic diversity of Brassica napus L. Germplasm from China and Europe assessed by some agronomically important characters. Euphytica 154:9–16
Jansen RC, Nap JP (2001) Genetical genomics: the added value from segregation. Trends Genet 17:388–391
Jean M, Brown G, Landry B (1998) Targeted mapping approaches to identify DNA markers linked to the Rfp1 restorer gene for the ‘Polima’ CMS of canola (Brassica napus L.). Theor Appl Genet 97:431–438
Jesske T, Olberg B, Becker H (2011) Resynthesized rapeseed with wild Brassica species as new genetic resource for breeding Proc. 13th International Rapeseed Congress, pp. 816–819
Kirkegaard J, Gardner P, Angus J, Koetz E (1994) Effect of Brassica break crops on the growth and yield of wheat. Crop Pasture Sci 45:529–545
Kole C, Thormann C, Karlsson B, Palta J, Gaffney P, Yandell B, Osborn T (2002a) Comparative mapping of loci controlling winter survival and related traits in oilseed Brassica rapa and B. napus. Mol breed 9:201–210
Kole C, Williams P, Rimmer S, Osborn T (2002b) Linkage mapping of genes controlling resistance to white rust (Albugo candida) in Brassica rapa (syn. campestris) and comparative mapping to Brassica napus and Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome 45:22–27
Long D, Martin M, Sundberg E, Swinburne J, Puangsomlee P, Coupland G (1993) The maize transposable element system Ac/Ds as a mutagen in Arabidopsis: identification of an albino mutation induced by Ds insertion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:10370–10374
Lukens LN, Quijada PA, Udall J, Pires JC, Schranz M, Osborn TC (2004) Genome redundancy and plasticity within ancient and recent Brassica crop species. Biol J Linnean Soc 82:665–674
Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen YJ, Chen Z (2005) Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nat 437:376–380
Mbarek KB, Boubaker M (2013) Evaluation of kabuli chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.) collection under tunisian semi-arid conditions. Albanian J Agri Sci 12(2), 191-201
Mekonnen F, Mekbib F, Kumar S, Ahmed S, Sharma T (2014) Phenotypic variability and characteristics of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) germplasm of Ethiopia by multivariate analysis. J Agri Crop Res 2:104–116
Moose SP, Mumm RH (2008) Molecular plant breeding as the foundation for 21st century crop improvement. Plant Physiol 147:969–977
Nelson RJ, Naylor RL, Jahn MM (2004) The role of genomics research in improvement of “orphan” crops. Crop Sci 44:1901–1904
Nelson DE, Repetti PP, Adams TR, Creelman RA, Wu J, Warner DC, Anstrom DC, Bensen RJ, Castiglioni PP, Donnarummo MG (2007) Plant nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) B subunits confer drought tolerance and lead to improved corn yields on water-limited acres. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:16450–16455
Noman A, Fahad S, Aqeel M, Ali U, Amanullah Anwar S, Baloch SK, Zainab M (2017) miRNAs: major modulators for crop growth and development under abiotic stresses. Biotechnol Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-017-2302-9
Norton R, Kirkegaard J, Angus J, Potter T (1999) Canola in rotations Canola in Australia: the first thirty years’(Eds P Salisbury, T Potter, G McDonald, A Green) pp:23–28
Parkin IA, Clarke WE, Sidebottom C, Zhang W, Robinson SJ, Links MG, Karcz S, Higgins EE, Fobert P, Sharpe AG (2010) Towards unambiguous transcript mapping in the allotetraploid Brassica napus. Genome 53:929–938
Penfield S, Rylott EL, Gilday AD, Graham S, Larson TR, Graham IA (2004) Reserve mobilization in the Arabidopsis endosperm fuels hypocotyl elongation in the dark is independent of abscisic acid and requires phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase1. Plant Cell Online 16:2705–2718
Plieske J, Struss D (2001) STS markers linked to Phoma resistance genes of the Brassica B-genome revealed sequence homology between Brassica nigra and Brassica napus. Theor Appl Genet 102:483–488
Radoev M, Becker HC, Ecke W (2008) Genetic analysis of heterosis for yield and yield components in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) by quantitative trait locus mapping. Genetics 179: 1547–1558
Raffel SJ, Stabb EV, Milner JL, Handelsman J (1996) Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of zwittermicin A-producing strains of Bacillus cereus. Microbiol 142:3425–3436
Rehman H, Iqbal Q, Farooq M, Wahid A, Afzal I, Basra SM (2013) Sulphur application improves the growth, seed yield and oil quality of canola. Acta Physiol Plant 35:2999–3006
Rieger M, Potter T, Preston C, Powles S (2001) Hybridisation between Brassica napus L. and Raphanus raphanistrum L. under agronomic field conditions. Theor Appl Genet 103:555–560
Rieger MA, Lamond M, Preston C, Powles SB, Roush RT (2002) Pollen-mediated movement of herbicide resistance between commercial canola fields. Science 296:2386–2388
Ringdahl E, McVetty P, Sernyk J (1987) Intergeneric hybridization of Diplotaxis spp. with Brassica napus: a source of new CMS systems? CanJ Plant Sci 67:239–243
Scheffler JA, Dale PJ (1994) Opportunities for gene transfer from transgenic oilseed rape (Brassica napus) to related species. Transgenic Res 3:263–278
Schwender J, Goffman F, Ohlrogge JB, Shachar-Hill Y (2004) A novel role for Rubisco in the carbon economy of developing seeds. Nat 432:779–782
Shahin Y, Valiollah R (2009) Effects of row spacing and seeding rates on some agronomical traits of spring canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. J Cent Eur Agr 10:115–121
Sivasithamparam K, Barbetti MJ, Li H (2005) Recurring challenges from a necrotrophic fungal plant pathogen: a case study with Leptosphaeria maculans (causal agent of blackleg disease in Brassicas) in Western Australia. Ann Bot 96:363–377
Snowdon RJ, Friedt W (2004) Molecular markers in Brassica oilseed breeding: current status and future possibilities. Plant Breed 123:1–8
Snowdon RJ, Iniguez LFL (2012) Potential to improve oilseed rape and canola breeding in the genomics era. Plant Breed 131:351–360
Somers DJ, Rakow G, Prabhu VK, Friesen KR (2001) Identification of a major gene and RAPD markers for yellow seed coat colour in Brassica napus. Genome 44:1077–1082
Starner DE, Hamama AA, Bhardwaj L (1999) Canola oil yield and quality as affected by production practices in Virginia. Perspectives on new crops and new uses. ASHS Press Alexandria, VA, pp 254–256
Town CD, Cheung F, Maiti R, Crabtree J, Haas BJ, Wortman JR, Hine EE, Althoff R, Arbogast TS, Tallon LJ (2006) Comparative genomics of Brassica oleracea and Arabidopsis thaliana reveal gene loss fragmentation and dispersal after polyploidy. Plant Cell Online 18:1348–1359
Tuberosa R, Salvi S, Giuliani S, Sanguineti MC, Bellotti M, Conti S, Landi P (2007) Genome-wide approaches to investigate and improve maize response to drought. Crop Sci 47: S-120-S-141
Uzunova M, Ecke W, Weissleder K, Röbbelen G (1995) Mapping the genome of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). I. Construction of an RFLP linkage map and localization of QTLs for seed glucosinolate content. Theor Appl Genet 90:194–204
Varshney R, Horres R, Molina C, Nayak S, Jungmann R, Swamy P, Winter P, Jayashree B, Kahl G, Hoisington D (2007) Extending the repertoire of microsatellite markers for genetic linkage mapping and germplasm screening in chickpea. Journal of SAT Agri Res 5:1–3
Warwick, S (2005) Potential gene flow from Brassica juncea (imidazolinone-tolerant PNT) into Sinapis arvensis - characterization of F2, F3, F4 and backcross hybrid generations. Final Report to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency
Warwick SI, Beckie HJ, Thomas AG, McDonald T (2000) The biology of Canadian weeds. 8. Sinapis arvensis. L. (updated). Can J Plant Sci 80:939–961
Wu JG, Shi CH, Zhang HZ (2006) Partitioning genetic effects due to embryo cytoplasm and maternal parent for oil content in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Genet Mol Biol 29:533–538
Xiao Y, Chen L, Zou J, Tian E, Xia W, Meng J (2010) Development of a population for substantial new type Brassica napus diversified at both A/C genomes. T Theor Appl Genet 121:1141–1150
Joshi N, Sharma S, Subramanian R, Rao K. Genetic Fingerprinting of Chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.) Germplasm Using Morphological and Molecular Markers
Yu J, Buckler ES (2006) Genetic association mapping and genome organization of maize. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17:155–160
Yu J, Holland JB, McMullen MD, Buckler ES (2008) Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize. Genetics 178:539–551
Zhou W, Zhang G, Tuvesson S, Dayteg C, Gertsson B (2006) Genetic survey of Chinese and Swedish oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) by simple sequence repeats (SSRs). Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:443–447
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the Deanship of Scientific Research, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia for support and cooperation in the completion of the present research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Afzal, M., Alghamdi, S.S., Habib ur Rahman, M. et al. Current status and future possibilities of molecular genetics techniques in Brassica napus. Biotechnol Lett 40, 479–492 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-018-2510-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-018-2510-y