Abstract
Age-related decline in physical and cognitive functions are facts of life that do not affect everyone to the same extent. We had reported earlier that such cognitive decline is both sex- and context-dependent. Moreover, age-associated ultrastructural changes were observed in the hippocampus of male rats. In this study, we sought to determine potential differences in ultrastructural changes between male and female rats at various stages of life. We performed quantitative electron microscopic evaluation of hippocampal CA1 region, an area intimately involved in cognitive behavior, in both male and female adolescent, adult and old Wistar rats. Specifically, we measured the number of docking synaptic vesicles in axo-dendritic synapses, the length of active zone as well as the total number of synaptic vesicles. Distinct age- and sex-dependent effects were observed in several parameters. Thus, adult female rats had the lowest synaptic active zone compared to both adolescent and old female rats. Moreover, the same parameter was significantly lower in adult and old female rats compared to their male counterparts. On the other hand, old male rats had significantly lower number of total synaptic vesicles compared to both adolescent and adult male rats as well as compared to their female counterparts. Taken together, it may be suggested that age- and sex-dependent ultrastructural changes in the hippocampus may underlie at least some of the differences in cognitive functions among these groups.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Aging is a universal phenomenon characterized by progressive changes in all aspects of organism including decreases in general functionality of cells and increased risk of developing diseases including cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (da Costa et al. 2016; Fulop et al., 2016; Alexander et al. 2020; Azam et al. 2021; Saul and Kosinsky 2021). Understanding the changes at cellular level may help advance strategies to preserve and improve functional abilities in elderly population (Dumas 2017; Blanchet et al. 2018; Kafri et al. 2019).
Cognition is especially affected with aging as age-related mild cognitive decline may be manifested long before severe cognitive deteriorations that are observed in AD or other neurodegenerative diseases (Li et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2020; Lomidze et al. 2021; Pini and Wennberg 2021; Rizzolo et al. 2021; Fu et al. 2022). Cognitive declines are invariably associated with structural and functional alterations in brain regions and circuits regulating cognitive behavior (Reas et al. 2018; Liang et al., 2020; Lomidze et al. 2021). However, considerable sex-dependent variability may be observed in cognitive decline (Flatt and Partridge 2018; Lovden et al., 2020; Wilson et al. 2020). Thus, women and men differ in disease occurrence and progression. Hence, women have a greater prevalence of AD than men, and that this discrepancy can be at least partly due to differences in biological factors such as sex hormones (Carter et al. 2012; Rocca et al. 2014; Lin et al., 2015; Levine et al. 2021). Moreover, women might have greater cognitive reserve but faster cognitive decline than men, which could contribute to sex differences in late-life dementia (Levine et al. 2021). Preclinical studies have also verified sex-dependent differences in neurophysiology and behavior of various species. In this context, same sensory stimulus, may result in sex-specific neural activity underscored by differential neuroanatomical and molecular bases (van Eijk et al. 2020; Gegenhuber and Tollkuhn 2020; Hansell et al., 2022). In addition, estrous cycle may influence the response in females (Rock et al., 2022; Rock and Kundakovic, 2023).
Regarding aging, however, the influence of sex on cognitive decline and/or neurobiological substrates including ultrastructural changes in areas controlling cognition are far from clear (McCarrey et al. 2016, Zhvania et al. 2021). It is well-established that the hippocampus, one of key brain regions controlling cognition, is influenced by sex. Hence, sex-dependent differences in the size of hippocampal subregions, dendritic organization, microglial reaction or neurogenesis have been reported (Koss and Frick 2017; Nelson et al. 2017; Sharfman and MacLusky, 2017; van Eijk, 2020; Yagi anf Galea, 2019; Zhang et al. 2023). However, so far, there has been no report on the influence of sex on fine/ultrastructural anatomy of the hippocampus during aging.
Our previous findings indicated age-related alterations in hippocampal ultrastructure of male Wistar rats (Lomidze et al. 2021). We reported that in comparison with adolescent, old male rats had significantly lower number of synaptic vesicles and synaptic mitochondria (Lomidze et al. 2021). Moreover, we showed that age-related cognitive decline in rats is sex- and context-dependent (Zhvania et al. 2021). In this study, applying electron microscopic (EM) assessments, we sought to determine potential sex-dependent effects on synaptic morphology of the hippocampus in adolescent, adult, and old rats. Thus, by using both male and female rats, we intended not only to verify our previous findings with male rats but also to be able to make a direct comparison between the two sexes. Specifically, we focused on synaptic active zone (AZ), synaptic vesicles (SVs), and presynaptic and postsynaptic mitochondria in hippocampal CA1 region, an area intimately involved in cognitive regulation.
Materials and methods
Animals
The study included adolescent (P30-36), adult (P125-130) and older (P330-340) male and female Wistar rats. Each sex- and age- group consisted of six animals (total 36 animals). The animals were housed three per cage, in open, wire-top polypropylene cages (30 cm width × 30 cm length × 25 cm height). The room was maintained under 12 h light/dark cycle (light on 7 a.m.), temperature (20–22 °C) and humidity (55–60%). Food and water were supplied ad libitum.
Estrous cyclicity is an important aspect that must be taken into consideration when studying female animals as various stages of estrous may have differential effects on brain functions including hippocampal physiology (Rock et al., 2022; Rock and Kundakovic, 2023). While the middle-aged animals are usually in a transition phase where erratic estrous cyclicity and lengthening of cycle may be manifested, old animals have a consistent estrous cycle. Thus, adult, and adolescent females were studied during diestrus stage, a short period of sexual latency between two periods of estrous - in rats the length of this stage is 48–72 h. The diestrus stage was determined by the recommended visual assessment, which is non-invasive, fast, reliable, and less stressful compared to the vaginal smear in rats (Ajavi and Akhidbe, 2020).
The maintenance of animals and electron-microscopic procedures were conducted in accordance with European Union Directive on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (Directive 2010/63/EU) and were approved by The Committee of Animal Care at Ivane Beritashvili Center of Experimental Biomedicine.
Tissue preparation
The material for EM study was prepared according to conventional techniques used by our group (Lobzhanidze et al. 2019, 2020; Lomidze et al. 2020; Zhvania et al. 2021). Specifically, after an overdose of sodium pentobarbital (200 mg/ml dissolved in 10% ethanol), animals underwent transcardiac perfusion using ice cold heparinized 0.9% NaCl, followed by 500 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, at a perfusion pressure of 120 mm Hg. The brains were removed from skull and postfixed overnight in cold (4 °C) perfusion solution. The regions of the hippocampi between − 2.28 and − 3.48 mm from bregma were identified according to the atlas of Paxinos and Watson (Paxinos and Watson 2006). The tissue was osmicated (1% OsO4 in PB for 30 min), dehydrated in graded series of ethanol and acetone, then in a mixture of acetone and Durcupan resin and flat-embedded in Araldit 502 (Electron Microscopy Sciences, PA, USA). After polymerization, semi-thin Sect. (400 nm) were prepared with an ulltratome Leica EM UC7, stained with toluidine blue and examined under optical microscope Leica MM AF. This was done to facilitate selection of the same subarea of C1 in all animals. Serial ultra-thin Sect. (40-45 nm) were then prepared with an ulltratome Leica EM UC7. In order to avoid duplicate examination of the same presynaptic terminal, we selected every fifth section in each age- and sex group, yielding 7 similar hippocampal samples in each group. The sections were placed on 200-mesh copper grid (Electron Microscopy Sciences, PA, USA), double-stained with uranyl-acetate and lead citrate and examined with JEM 1400 electron microscope (JEOL, Japan).
Quantitative EM analysis
In this study, morphometrical analysis of asymmetric axo-spine synapses and synapses on thin dendrites of hippocampal CA1 area were carried out. In the hippocampus such kinds of synapses are mainly considered as the glutamatergic, excitatory types. Synapses were identified based on their pre-synaptic and post-synaptic densities, the presence of round vesicles, and the synaptic cleft between the pre-and post-synaptic membranes in 20,000-times magnified electron micrographs. In presynaptic terminals, the length of AZ, total number of SVs and the number of SVs in different synaptic pools were measured as detailed in our earlier studies (Lobzhanidze et al. 2019, 2020; Lomidze et al. 2020). AZ was identified by rigid opposing of presynaptic and postsynaptic membrane, clustering of SVs at the presynaptic membrane and asymmetric postsynaptic density (Sudhof, 2012). The total number of SVs in presynaptic compartment and number of docking SVs (in the readily releasable pool located at a distance of up to 50 nm from AZ) were quantified (Fig. 1). In total, 90 micrographs per group (15 from each animal) were analyzed. The measurements were carried out in blind manner, using the Image J software (Version 1.44, The National Institute of Mental Health). Quantification result of each parameter consisted of pooled samples from 6 animals. It is important to note that we have consistently applied these methodologies and here also adhered to them strictly so that inter-study comparison of results, especially concerning behavioral and ultrastructural data would be easily tenable.
Statistical analysis
Statistical Computation VassarStats (http://vassarstats.net) was used for quantitative data analysis. To determine the effects of “sex” (two levels - female and male) and “age” (three levels - adolescent, adult and old) on morphometric parameters, two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons post hoc test was used. The P-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The data is presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
Results
Length of active zone of synapses (nm)
Significant main effects of sex (F1448 = 21, p < 0.001), age (F2448 = 8.19, p = 0.003) as well as interaction of “sex×age” (F2448 = 8.09, p = 0.004) on the length of active zone were observed (Fig. 2). Thus, in female rats, adults had the lowest measure of synaptic active zone (163.8 ± 7.9 nm) compared to both adolescent (249.2 ± 9.4, p < 0.01) and old female (199.0 ± 14.1, p < 0.01) rats. Old female rats also had a lower measure compared to adolescents (249.2 ± 9, p < 0.01). Although no significant differences between various male groups were noted, both adult (241.1 ± 8.1) and old (258.6 ± 10.95) male rats had significantly higher levels compared to their female counterparts (p < 0.01) (Fig. 2b).
Total number of synaptic vesicles in the presynaptic terminals
Significant main effect of sex (F1395 = 4.08, p = 0.044), and interaction of “sex×age” (F2395 = 6.6, p = 0.0015) on the total number of vesicles in presynaptic terminals were observed. Thus, although female rats did not exhibit any age-dependent changes, old male rats had significantly lower number of synaptic vesicles (70.7 ± 3.3) compared to both adolescent (92.8 ± 5.5, p < 0.01) and adult rats (101.9 ± 5.3, p < 0.01). Moreover, adolescent and adult female rats had significantly lower number of synaptic vesicles compared to their male counterparts (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). On the other hand, old female rats had significantly higher levels of synaptic vesicles compared to their male counterpart (p < 0.01) (Fig. 2c).
Number of docking synaptic vesicles in the readily releasable pool (RRP)
Significant main effect of sex (F1395 = 11.79, p = 0.007), age (F2395 = 5.15, p = 0.006) and their interaction (F2395 = 5.76, p = 0.003) in the number of synaptic vesicles in readily releasable pool were observed (Fig. 2b). Thus, although female rats showed no significant differences between various groups, both adolescent (11.75 ± 0.8) and adult male animals (13.8 ± 0.8) had significantly higher levels of synaptic vesicles in RRP compared to the old group (8.06 ± 0.4) (p < 0.01). Moreover, both adolescent and adult female rats had lower synaptic vesicles in this pool compared to their male counterparts (p < 0.01) (Fig. 2d).
The area of presynaptic mitochondria (µm2)
As depicted in Fig. 3b, the presynaptic mitochondrial area was affected by both sex (F1515 = 13.19, p = 0.003) and age (F2515 = 10.5, p < 0.001). Thus, in female group, the old rats (0.075 ± 0.008) had significantly higher levels compared to adults only (0.059 ± 0.003 µm2, p < 0.01). In male group, however, the old rats (0.072 ± 0.006) had significantly higher levels compared to both adolescent (0.053 ± 0.003, p < 0.01) and adult rats (0.047 ± 0.003, p < 0.01). No significant difference between adolescent and adult rats was detected in either sex group. However, adolescent and adult female rats had significantly higher presynaptic mitochondrial area compared to their male counterparts (p < 0.01) (Fig. 3b).
The area of postsynaptic mitochondria (µm2)
As depicted in Fig. 3b, the postsynaptic mitochondrial area was also affected by both sex (F1852 = 7.49, p = 0.006) and age (F2852 = 9.75, p = 0.001). Thus, in female group, the adult rats (0.058 ± 0.003) had significantly lower level compared to both adolescent (0.068 ± 0.003, p < 0.05) and old rats (0.071 ± 0.003, p < 0.05). In male group, however, not only the adult rats had lower levels (0.051 ± 0.002) compared to both adolescent (0.062 ± 0.005, p < 0.05) and old (0.072 ± 0.008, p < 0.01) rats, but the old rats had also significantly higher levels than adolescent rats (p < 0.05). Here also, like presynaptic area (Fig. 3b), both adolescent and adult female rats had significantly higher postsynaptic mitochondrial area compared to their male counterparts (p < 0.01) (Fig. 3c).
Discussion
The results of this study indicate that aging-associated changes at ultrastructural level of synapses may be influenced by sex differences. It should be noted that although there is a distinction between the term “sex” and “gender”, they are often used interchangeably. Sex refers to the biological differences between males and females, such as the reproductive organs and genetic differences, whereas gender refers to the socially constructed identities and behavior of men, women, or gender-diverse people.
Previously, using a multi-branched maze (MBM) test and the Morris water maze (MWM) test, we had shown sex- and context dependent alterations in cognition during aging (Zhvania et al. 2021). MWM, designed to evaluate spatial memory by using spatial clues to locate the escape platform, and MBM, designed to evaluate short- and long- term memory by measuring escape latency, distance travelled, velocity and some other parameters to find the optimal trajectory, were differentially affected in female vs. male rats (Zhvania et al. 2021). Here also we report that hippocampal CA1 region, an area intimately involved in regulation of cognitive functions (Sakimoto et al. 2021) is differentially affected in different sexes. It may be suggested therefore, that the differences in cognitive behaviors at various stages of life between male and females may at least partially be due to the fine ultrastructural differences in key brain areas. Interestingly, sex-dependent differences were observed during adolescence, adulthood, and old age, confirming distinct sex-dependent effects at various stages of life (Zhvania et al. 2021).
Specifically, our findings indicate that the number of synaptic vesicles, including both presynaptic and postsynaptic, as well as mitochondrial morphology, may be affected by gender at all stages of life. Thus, adult female rats had the lowest synaptic active zone compared to both adolescent and old female rats. Moreover, the same parameter was significantly lower in adult and old female rats compared to their male counterparts. On the other hand, old male rats had significantly lower number of total synaptic vesicles compared to both adolescent and adult male rats as well as compared to their female counterparts. Since synaptic morphology is associated with synaptic strength and/or plasticity, our observation of age-related morphological decline mainly in male rats may suggest a central basis for age-related cognitive decline in this gender.
Various regions of hippocampus control various aspects of cognitive (memory) function. While CA3 area is important for encoding, storage and retrieval of memory; and dentate gyrus serves for pattern separation of the incoming inputs from entorhinal cortex (Balleza-Tapia et al. 2022; Grande et al. 2019; Senzai 2019), CA1 region is critical for acquisition of spatial and nonspatial memory (Asgeirsdottis et al., 2020; Cinalli et al. 2023; Geiller et al. 2023; Sakimoto et al. 2021). Indeed, CA1 “place cells” provide precise representations of specific locations in an environment and code for associations between objects and locations (Stevenson et al. 2018). Therefore, in MWM and MBM tests, CA1 area is actively involved. Moreover, in several neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders (cognitive declines, schizophrenia, major depressive and bipolar disorders) or hypoxic and ischemic damages, the CA1 region seems to be most vulnerable compared to other hippocampal areas (Han et al. 2019; Ota et al., 2016). It is also noteworthy that CA1 area manifests sex-dependent differences (van Eijk et al. 2020). This is likely due to expression of estrogen and progesterone (ovarian hormones) receptors in this area (McEwen et al. 2001; Tozzi et al.,2019; Wang et al. 2021). Additionally, because of commonalities in CA1 region of all mammals, these findings could have translational implications in humans as well. However, this aspect and potential role of other hippocampal regions have to be further explored.
Our data is also consistent with reports of sex-dependent differences in molecular architecture of brain regions involved in cognitive functions (Bundy et a., 2017; Ocañas et al. 2022). Sex-dependent differences in age-related neurodegenerative diseases and associated cognitive declines due to alterations in hippocampal function are amply documented (Gurvich et al. 2020; Kilpi et al. 2020; Guo et al.,2022). Although our quantitative measure of synaptic vesicles in presynaptic terminals cannot be considered a direct measure of neurotransmitter levels, these vesicles represent the storage of neurotransmitters and a decrease in their number may be considered an indirect indication of a decrease in neurotransmitter release (Kim et al. 2017, 2019; Kusick et al. 2020; Tran et al.,2022). It is noteworthy that after fusing with the plasma membrane and expelling the neurotransmitter, new vesicles supplied by the recycling and reserve pools replace the consumed vesicles. Thus, the observed decrease in the number of vesicles in old male rats might be indicative of a decrease in functional capacity of the CA1 region in this particular group.
In contrast to male rats, both adult and old female rats showed significant decrease in the length of the active zone of synapses, the main function of which is to convert presynaptic action potential into neurotransmitter signal (Watanabe et al. 2020). In addition, this specialized area participates in short- and long-term plasticity (Südhof 2012; Monday et al. 2018; Sigrist et al.,2018). Hence, a reduction in the length of the active zone in adult and old female rats may reflect decreased activities in specific hippocampal circuitries. However, whether estrogen fluctuations, particularly during menopause may contribute to these outcomes and whether these changes have a bearing on cognitive performance has yet to be determined.
Finally, a very similar pattern of changes was noted in pre- and post-synaptic mitochondria in both female and male rats across all ages. Presynaptic mitochondria provide the energy needed for neurotransmission and play an essential role in synaptic plasticity (Subramanian and Jonas 2021; Li and Sheng 2022). Postsynaptic mitochondria, on the other hand, generate the energy used to maintain downstream events associated with neuronal function (Mendelsohn et al. 2022). The intensity and the size of both mitochondrion types are directly related to their activity and the metabolic status of the neurons (Freeman et al. 2017; Thomas et al. 2019). The increase in volume of pre- and post-synaptic mitochondria is usually associated with higher firing rates (Justs et al. 2022; Li and Sheng 2022). Therefore, it may be suggested that the significant increase in synaptic mitochondria in old animals of both sexes may reflect a compensatory mechanism towards maintaining the energy requirement of the cell. However, further verification of this hypothesis is necessary.
In summary, our EM morphometric analyses of the hippocampal CA1 region in adolescent, adult and old male and female rats reveal sex-dependent ultrastructural changes at both pre-and post-synaptic levels. Although further verifications are required, such modifications may underlie differential cognitive changes between the two sexes at various stages of life including aging.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ajayi AF, Akhigbe RE (2020) Staging of the estrous cycle and induction of estrus in experimental rodents: an update. Fertil Res Pract March 14:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00074-3
Alexander GE, Lin L, Yoshimaru ES, Bharadwaj PK, Bergfield KL, Hoang LT, Chawla MK, Chen K, Moeller JR, Barnes CA, Trouard TP (2020) Age-related regional network covariance of magnetic resonance imaging gray matter in the rat. front. Aging Neurosci 12:267. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00267
Ásgeirsdóttir HN, Cohen SJ, Stackman RW Jr (2020) Object and place information processing by CA1 hippocampal neurons of C57BL/6J mice. J Neurophysiol 123(3):1247–1264. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00278.2019
Azam S, Haque ME, Balakrishnan R, Kim IS, Choi DK (2021) The ageing brain: molecular and cellular basis of neurodegeneration. Front Cell Dev Biol 9:683459. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.683459
Balleza-Tapia H, Arroyo-García LE, Isla AG, Loera-Valencia R, Fisahn A (2022) Functionally-distinct pyramidal cell subpopulations during gamma oscillations in mouse hippocampal area CA3. Prog Neurobiol 210:102213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102213
Blanchet S, Chikhi D, Maltais D (2018) The benefits of physical activities on cognitive and mental health in healthy and pathological aging. Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil 16:197–205. https://doi.org/10.1684/pnv.2018.0734
Bundy L, Vied C, Nowakowski RS (2017) Sex differences in the molecular signature of the developing mouse hippocampus. BMC Genomics 18(1):237. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3608-7
Carter CL, Resnick EM, Mallampalli M, Kalbarczyk A (2012) Sex and gender differences in Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations for future research. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 21:1018–1023. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2012.3789
Cinalli DA Jr, Cohen SJ, Calubag M, Oz G, Zhou L, Stackman RW Jr (2023) DREADD-inactivation of dorsal CA1 pyramidal neurons in mice impairs retrieval of object and spatial memories. Hippocampus 33(1):6–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.23484
da Costa JP, Vitorino R, Silva GM, Vogel C, Duarte AC, Rocha-Santos TA (2016) A synopsis on aging—theories, mechanisms and future prospects. Ageing Res Rev 29:90–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2016.06.005
Dumas JA (2017) Strategies for preventing cognitive decline in healthy older adults. Can J Psychiatry 62:754–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743717720691
Flatt T, Partridge L (2018) Horizons in the evolution of aging. BMC Biol 16(1):93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0562-z
Freeman DW, Petralia RS, Wang YX, Mattson MP, PJ Yao PJ (2017) Mitochondria in hippocampal presynaptic and postsynaptic compartments differ in size as well as intensity. Matters (Zur). https://doi.org/10.19185/matters.201711000009
Fu Z, Zhao M, He Y, Wang X, Li X, Kang G, Han YS, Li S (2022) Aberrant topological organization and age-related differences in the human connectome in subjective cognitive decline by using regional morphology from magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Struct Funct 227:2015–2033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-022-02488-9
Fülöp T, Larbi A, Witkowski JM (2016) Hum inflammaging. Gerontol 65:495–504. https://doi.org/10.1159/000497375
Gegenhuber B, Tollkuhn J (2020) Signatures of sex: sex differences in gene expression in the vertebrate brain. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 9(1):e348. https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.348
Geiller T, Priestley JB, Losonczy A (2023) A local circuit-basis for spatial navigation and memory processes in hippocampal area CA1. Curr Opin Neurobiol 79:102701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2023.102701
Grande X, Berron D, Horner AJ, Bisby JA, Düzel E, Burgess N (2019) Holistic recollection via pattern completion involves hippocampal subfield CA3. J Neurosci 39(41):8100–8111. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0722-19.2019
Guo L, Zhong MB, Zhang L, Zhang B, Cai D (2022) Sex differences in Alzheimer’s disease: insights from the multiomics landscape. Biol Psychiatry 91:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.02.968
Gurvich C, Thomas N, Kulkarni J (2020) Sex differences in cognition and aging and the influence of sex hormones. Handb Clin Neurol 175:103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64123-6.00008-4
Han KM, Kim A, Kang W, Kang Y, Kang J, Won E, Tae WS, Ham BJ (2019) Hippocampal subfield volumes in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. Eur Psychiatry 57:70–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.01.016
Hansell NK, Strike LT, van Eijk L, O’Callaghan V, Martin NG, de Zubicaray GI, Thompson PM, McMahon KL, Wright MJ (2022) Genetic specificity of hippocampal subfield volumes, relative to hippocampal formation, identified in 2148 young adult twins and siblings. Twin Res Hum Genet 25(3):129–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2022.20
Justs KA, Lu Z, Chouhan AK, Borycz JA, Lu Z, Meinertzhagen IA, Macleod GT (2022) Presynaptic mitochondrial volume and packing density scale with presynaptic power demand. J Neurosci 42:954–967. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1236-21.2021
Kafri M, Hutzler Y, Korsensky OY, Laufer Y (2019) Functional performance and balance in the oldest-old. J Geriatr Phys Ther 42:183–188. https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000133
Kilpi F, Soares ALG, Fraser A, Nelson SM, Sattar N, Fallon SJ, Tilling K, Lawlor DA (2020) Changes in six domains of cognitive function with reproductive and chronological ageing and sex hormones: a longitudinal study in 2411 UK mid-life women. BMC Womens Health 20(1):177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-01040-3
Kim JH, Huh YH (2019) Trafficking of synaptic vesicles is changed at the hypothalamus by exposure to an 835 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field. Gen Physiol Biophys 38:379–388. https://doi.org/10.4149/gpb_2019020
Kim JH, Kim HJ, Yu DH, Kweon HS, Huh YH, Kim HR (2017) Changes in numbers and size of synaptic vesicles of cortical neurons induced by exposure to 835 MHz radiofrequency-electromagnetic field. PLoS ONE 12(10):e0186416. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186416
Koss WA, Frick KM (2017) Sex differences in hippocampal function. J Neurosci Res 2:539–562. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23864
Kusick GF, Chin M, Raychaudhuri S, Lippmann K, Adula KP, Hujber EJ, Vu T, Davis MW, Jorgensen EM, Watanabe S (2020) Synaptic vesicles transiently dock to refill release sites. Nat Neurosci 23:1329–1338. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00716-1
Levine DA, Gross AL, Briceño EM, Tilton N, Giordani BJ, Sussman JB, Hayward R, Burke RA, Hingtgen JF, Elkind S et al (2021) Sex differences in cognitive decline among US adults. JAMA Netw Open 4(2):e210169. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0169
Li S, Sheng ZH (2022) Energy matters: presynaptic metabolism and the maintenance of synaptic transmission. Nat Rev Neurosci 23:4–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-021-00535-8
Li Y, Ning L, Yin Y, Wang R, Zhang Z, Hao L, Wang B, Zhao X, Yang X, Yin L, Wu L, Guo S, Zhang D (2020) Age-related shifts in gut microbiota contribute to cognitive decline in aged rats. Aging 12:7801–7817. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.103093
Liang KJ, Carlson ES (2020) Resistance, vulnerability and resilience: a review of the cognitive cerebellum in aging and neurodegenerative diseases. Neurobiol Learn Mem Apr 170:106981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2019.01.004
Lin KA, Choudhury KR, Rathakrishnan BG, Marks DM, Petrella JP, Doraiswamy PM (2015) Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative. Marked gender differences in progression of mild cognitive impairment over 8 years. Alzheimers Dement (NY) 1:103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2015.07.001
Lobzhanidze G, Lordkipanidze T, Zhvania M, Japaridze N, MacFabe DF, Pochkidze N, Gasimov E, Rzaev F (2019) Effect of propionic acid on the morphology of the amygdala in adolescent male rats and their behavior. Micron 125:102732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2019.102732
Lobzhanidze G, Japaridze N, Lordkipanidze T, Rzayev F, MacFabe D, Zhvania M (2020) Behavioral and brain ultrastructural changes following the systemic administration of propionic acid in adolescent male rats. Further development of a rodent model of autism. Int J Dev Neurosci 80:139–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdn.10011
Lomidze N, Zhvania MG, Tizabi Y, Japaridze N, Pochkhidze N, Rzayev F, Gasimov E (2020) Age-related behavioral and ultrastructural changes in the rat amygdala. Dev Neurobiol 80:433–442. https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.22788
Lomidze N, Zhvania MG, Tizabi Y, Japaridze N, Pochkhidze N, Rzayev F, Lordkipanidze T (2021) Aging affects cognition and hippocampal ultrastructure in male Wistar rats. Dev Neurobiol 81:833–846. https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.22839
Lövdén M, Fratiglioni L, Glymour MM, Lindenberger U, Tucker-Drob EM (2020) Education and cognitive functioning across the life span. Psychol Sci Public Interest 21:6–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620920576
McCarrey AC, An Y, Kitner-Triolo MH, Ferrucci L, Resnick SM (2016) Sex differences in cognitive trajectories in clinically normal older adults. Psychol Aging 31:166–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000070
McEwen B, Akama K, Alves S, Brake WG, Bulloch K, Lee S, Li C, Yuen G, Milner TA (2001) Tracking the estrogen receptor in neurons: implications for estrogen-induced synapse formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(13):7093–100. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.121146898
Mendelsohn R, Garcia GC, Bartol TM, Lee CT, Khandelwal P, Liu E, Spencer DJ, Husar A, Bushong EA, Phan S et al (2022) Morphological principles of neuronal mitochondria. J Comp Neurol 530:886–902. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.25254
Monday R, Younts TJ, Castillo PE (2018) Long-term plasticity of neurotransmitter release: emerging mechanisms and contributions to brain function and disease. Annu Rev Neurosci 41:299–322. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-062155
Nelson LH, Warden S, Lenz KM (2017) Sex differences in microglial phagocytosis in the neonatal hippocampus. Brain Behav Immun 64:11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2017.03.010
Ocañas SR, Ansere VA, Tooley KB, Hadad N, Chucair-Elliott AJ, Stanford DA, Rice S, Wronowski B, Pham KD, Hoffman M et al (2022) Differential regulation of mouse hippocampal gene expression sex differences by chromosomal content and gonadal sex. Mol Neurobiol 20:1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-022-02860-0
Ota M, Sato N, Hidese S, Teraishi T, Maikusa N, Matsuda H, Hattori K, Kunugi H (2017) Structural differences in hippocampal subfields among schizophrenia patients, major depressive disorder patients, and healthy subjects. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 30:54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2016.11.002
Paxinos G, Watson C (2006) The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, 6th edn. Elsevier, London
Pini L, Wennberg AM (2021) Structural imaging outcomes in subjective cognitive decline: community vs. clinical-based samples. Exp Gerontol Mar 145:111216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2020.111216
Reas ET, Hagler DJ, Ir, White NS, Kuperman JM, Bartsch H, Wierenga CE, Galasko D, Brewer JB, Dale AM, McEvoy LK (2018) Microstructural brain changes track cognitive decline in mild cognitive impairment. Neuroimage Clin 20:883–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.09.027
Rizzolo L, Leger M, Corvaisier S, Groussard M, Platel H, Bouet V, Schumann-Bard P, Frere T (2021) Long-term music exposure prevents age-related cognitive deficits in rats independently of hippocampal neurogenesis. Cereb Cortex 31:620–634. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa247
Rocca WA, Mielke MM, Vemuri P, Miller VM (2014) Sex and gender differences in the causes of dementia: a narrative review. Maturitas 79:196–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.05.008
Rocks D, Kundakovic M (2023) Hippocampus-based behavioral, structural, and molecular dynamics across the estrous cycle. J Neuroendocrinol 35(2):e13216. https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.13216
Rocks D, Cham H, Kundakovic M (2022) Why the estrous cycle matters for neuroscience. Biol Sex Differ Oct 28(1):62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-022-00466-8
Sakimoto Y, Oo PM, Goshima M, Kanehisa I, Tsukada Y, Mitsushima D (2021) Significance of GABAA receptor for cognitive function and hippocampal pathology. Int J Mol Sci 22(22):12456. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212456
Saul D, Kosinsky RL (2021) Epigenetics of aging and aging-associated diseases. Int J Mol Sci 22(1):401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010401
Scharfman HE, MacLusky NJ (2017) Sex differences in hippocampal area CA3 pyramidal cells. J Neurosci Res 95(1–2):563–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23927
Senzai Y (2019) Function of local circuits in the hippocampal dentate gyrus-CA3 system. Neurosci Res 140:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2018.11.003
Sigrist S, Ohtsuka T (2018) The presynaptic active zone: molecules, plasticity, and diseases. Neurosci Res 127:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2018.01.004
Stevenson RF, Zheng J, Mnatsakanyan L, Vadera S, Knight RT, Lin JJ, Yassa MA (2018) Hippocampal CA1 gamma power predicts the precision of spatial memory judgments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115(40):10148–10153. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805724115
Subramanian S, Jonas EA (2021) Mitochondria: powerhouses of presynaptic plasticity. J Physiol 599:1363–1364. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP281040
Südhof TC (2012) The presynaptic active zone. Neuron 75:11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012
Thomas CI, Keine C, Okayama S, Satterfield R, Musgrove M, Guerrero-Given D, Kamasawa N, Young Ir SM (2019) Presynaptic mitochondria volume and abundance increase during development of a high-fidelity synapse. J Neurosci 39:7994–8012. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0363-19.2019
Tozzi A, Durante V, Manca P, Di Mauro M, Blasi J, Grassi S, Calabresi P, Kawato S, Pettorossi VE (2019) Bidirectional synaptic plasticity is driven by sex neurosteroids targeting estrogen and androgen receptors in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Front Cell Neurosci 4:534. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2019.00534
Tran V, Miki TA, Marty A (2022) Three small vesicular pools in sequence govern synaptic response dynamics during action potential trains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 119(5):e2114469119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114469119
van Eijk L, Hansell NK, Strike LT, Couvy-Duchesne B, de Zubicaray GI, Thompson PM, McMahon KL, Zietsch BP, Wright MJ (2020) Region-specific sex differences in the hippocampus. Neuroimage 15:116781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116781
Wang X, Huang W, Su L, Xing Y, Jessen F, Sun Y, Shu N, Han Y (2020) Neuroimaging advances regarding subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener 15:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-020-00395-3
Wang Z, Xie R, Yang X, Yin H, Li X, Liu T, Ma Y, Gao J, Zang Z, Ruan R, Li Y, Huang K, Chen Q, Shen K, Lv S, Zhang C, Yang H, Warner M, Gustafsson JA, Liu S, Fan X (2021) Female mice lacking ERβ display excitatory/inhibitory synaptic imbalance to drive the pathogenesis of temporal lobe epilepsy. Theranostics 11(12):6074–6089. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.56331
Watanabe S, Davis MW, Kusick GF, Iwasa J, Jorgensen EM (2020) SynapsEM: computer-assisted synapse morphometry. Front Synaptic Neurosci 12:584549. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2020.584549
Wilson RS, Wang T, Yu L, Bennett DA, Boyle PA (2020) Normative cognitive decline in old age. Ann Neurol 87:816–829. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25711
Yagi S, Galea LAM (2019) Sex differences in hippocampal cognition and neurogenesis. Neuropsychopharmacology 44(1):200–213. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-018-0208-4
Zhang Q, Li M, Wang Z, Chen F (2023) Sex differences in learning and performing the Go/NoGo tasks. Biol Sex Differ May 14(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-023-00504-z
Zhvania MG, Japaridze N, Tizabi Y, Lomidze N, Pochkhidze N, Lordkipanidze T (2021) Age-related cognitive decline in rats is sex and context dependent. Neurosci Lett 20:136262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136262
Funding
This work was supported by Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation of Georgia. Grant number is DP2016_17. Author Mzia Zhvania has received this support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Data collection were performed by NP and NL electron microscopic imaging was performed by FR and EG statistical analysis of data was performed by NJ and YT The first draft of the manuscript was written by MZ, YT prepared the final version of manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval
This study was performed in line with the Declaration and recommendations of the National Institute of Health (NIH) Guide for the Care and the Use of Laboratory Animals and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Ivane Beritashvili Center of Experimental Biomedicine.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhvania, M., Japaridze, N., Tizabi, Y. et al. Differential effects of aging on hippocampal ultrastructure in male vs. female rats. Biogerontology 24, 925–935 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-023-10052-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-023-10052-z