The study proposes a stepwise scheme of the initial stage in the transition to a closed nuclear fuel cycle (NFC) two-component nuclear power engineering system comprising fast and thermal reactors. The closure of the NFC appears to be economically justified due to the envisaged construction of between six and nine BN-1200M fast neutron power units. Since no scarcity of plutonium is expected by 2031, the assumed year of commissioning the BN-1200M fast neutron reactor, it is expedient to defer the processing of spent plutonium fuel and instead store it into the middle of 2050s, reducing capital and fuel costs. However, it will be cost-effective to begin full-scale processing at centralized productions after 2050, since the expected quantity of spent fuel from fast reactors will by then be sufficient to achieve significant reductions in the specific cost of its processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
N. N. Ponomarev-Stepnoi (ed.), A Two-Component Nuclear Power System with Thermal and Fast Reactors in a Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycle, Tekhnosfera, Moscow (2016).
P. N. Alekseev, A. Yu. Gagarinskii, M. A. Kalugin, et al., “Revisiting the strategy of the nuclear power engineering development in the Russian Federation,” At. Energiya, 126, No. 4, 183–187 (2019).
E. O. Adamov (ed.), White Book of Nuclear Power Engineering. Closed NFC with Fast Reactors, NIKIET, Moscow (2020).
A. V. Gulevich, O. S. Gurskaya, V. M. Dekusar, and A. L. Moseev, Initial Stage of Closing the NFC in Two-Component Nuclear Power Engineering. Challenges and Possible Solutions, Preprint FEI-3297 (2022).
A. G. Kalashnikov, A. L. Moseev, V. M. Dekusar, et al., “Development of the CYCLE software package for the system analysis of the nuclear fuel cycle,” Izv. Vuzov. Yad. Energet., No. 1, 91–99 (2016).
INFCIRC/549/add.9/21, Communication Received from the Russian Federation Concerning Its Policies Regarding the Managemert of Plutonium, IAEA Inform. Cicrular, Nov. 5, 2019.
D. A. Klinov, A. V. Gulevich, V. A. Eliseev, et al., “Correction of the plutonium isotopic composition using fast reactors,” At. Energiya, 129, No. 5, 265–272 (2020).
V. Eliseev, D. Klinov, N. Camarcat, et al., “On the possibility to improve mixed uranium-plutonium fuel in fast reactors,” NUCET, 6, No. 2, 131–135 (2020).
D. Shropshire, K. Williams, W. Boore, et al., Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis, INL/EXT-07-1207, Rev.1 (2008).
B. Spencer, G. Cul, and E. Collins, “Effect of scale on capital cost of nuclear fuel reprocessing,” Int. Conf. GLOBAL 2003, pp. 2255–2259 (CD).
D. Shropshire, K. Williams, W. Boore, et al., Advanced Fuel Cycle Economic Analysis of Symbiotic Light-Water Reactor and Fast Burner Reactor Systems, INL/EXT-09-15254 (2009).
W. Stroll, Lessons Learned at the Karlsruhe and Hanau Plants for Future MOX Technology, IIU/MD-001 (2002).
A. V. Zrodnikov, V. M. Dekusar, and O. S. Gurskaya, “System fuel component in the cost of electricity production in a two-component nuclear power system with a closed uranium-plutonium NFC,” Izv. Vuzov. Yad. Energet., No. 3, 5–17 (2021).
G. Clark, “International safeguards: An industry perspective,” IAEA Bull., 38, No.4, 25–28 (1996).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 133, No. 2, pp. 71–76, August, 2022.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tuzov, A.A., Troyanov, V.M., Gulevich, A.V. et al. The Initial Stage of Closing the NFC of the Russian Two-Component Nuclear Power Engineering System. At Energy 133, 72–78 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-023-00975-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-023-00975-8