Abstract
The tumor necrosis factor receptors (TNFRs) play essential roles in innate and adaptive immunity. Depending on conditions, TNFR induces multiple cell fates including cell survival, cell apoptosis, and cell programmed necrosis. Here, we review recent progress in structural studies of the TNFR signaling pathway. The structural basis for the high order signal complexes, including the DISC, ripoptosome, necrosome, and RIP3/MLKL complex, may provide novel insights for understanding the biophysical principles of cell signaling cascades.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) plays critical roles in diverse cellular processes and many pathological conditions by binding and activating its receptor TNFR [1]. The TNFR superfamily contains 29 members, which are transmembrane receptors composed of an extracellular domain and an intracellular domain. There are two groups of TNFRs, one is activating receptors that trigger multiple signaling pathways, such as nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways [2, 3]. The other is death receptors (DRs), like TNFR1 and Fas, which have a specific death domain (DD) that mediates cell apoptosis and necrosis. Among TNFR superfamily members, TNFR1 and CD40 can activate the NF-κB signaling pathway. Upon binding TNFα, the trimeric TNFR associates with the intracellular effector TNF receptor associated DD protein (TRADD), forms a large complex (complex I) by recruiting other factors including receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIP1), cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein 1 and 2 (cIAP1/2), and TNFR associated factors 2 (TRAF2) (Fig. 1). In complex I, the E3 ligases TRAF2/cIAP in addition with LUBAC (linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex) form K63 or K11 polyubiquitin chains on RIP1 [4]. The polyubiquitinated RIP1 engages downstream adaptors such as TGFβ activating kinase 1 (TAK1) and NEMO to activate the IKK complex, which in turn activating NF-κB transcription, promoting cell survival, proliferation and differentiation [5, 6]. Similar to the TNFR1 pathway, the trimeric TRAF6 directly interacts with the intracellular region of CD40, acting as the ubiquitin ligase to induced K63-linked polyubiquitination [7]. The polyubiquitin chains recruit downstream proteins, activating NF-κB translocation and transcription [8]. In addition to NF-κB activation, TNFR can also induce cell apoptosis and cell programmed necrosis upon binding with TNFα [9]. In this review, we will focus on and illustrates the structural basis for cell apoptosis and necrosis induced by TNFR signaling.
Cell apoptosis induced by TNFR1 and Fas
In complex I, if the K63-linked polyubiquitin chain of RIP1 is removed by the deubiquitinases CYLD or A20, or blocked by knocking out of E3 ligases cIAPs, RIP1 and the related protein RIP3, together with FADD, TRADD, and caspase-8, form a second complex (complex II). When caspase-8 is activated, it can cleave RIP1 or RIP3 at residues D324 or D328 respectively, and in turn inducing cell apoptosis [10, 11]. RIP1, FADD, and caspase-8 are the key components of this complex, and collectively referred to as the ripoptosome [12].
Structural basis of the ripoptosome
FADD consists of a DD and a death effector domain (DED) (Fig. 2a). DD, DED, in addition with CARD and PYRIN (PYD) belong to the DD superfamily, which can form oligomeric complexes involved in immunity and the inflammasome [13–15]. FADD interacts with RIP1 via the DD interaction, whereas recruits caspase-8 and -10 via the interactions with the tandem DEDs in the prodomain of the caspases [16, 17]. The typical DD is composed of a six alpha helices bundle [18]. The DD, DED, and full-length FADD structures have been determined by NMR and X-ray crystallography (Fig. 2b) [16, 19–21]. Although no high resolution structures are available for RIP1 DD or the DD complex between RIP1 and FADD, the MALS, electron microscopy (EM) average study and mutation analysis reveal that RIP1 and FADD form a large complex, probably in a 5:5 ratio [22]. This complex is very similar to the previous reported DD oligomers in the PIDDosome and Myddosome [18, 23]. Mutations on the interface between RIP1 and FADD affect complex formation [22]. The catalytic domain of caspase-8 forms a dimeric structure shared by all caspases [24, 25]. As the tandem DED of caspase-8 is prone to form large aggregates or filaments in vitro and in cells [26], obtaining a high resolution structure by X-crystallography is difficult. However, the tandem DED domain of a viral caspase-8/-10 and FLICE/caspase-8 inhibitory protein (FLIP) from poxvirus shows a dumb bell shaped structure common to all tandem DEDs (Fig. 2c) [27, 28]. Analysis by mass spectrometry, quantitative western blots, and modeling, has shown that the amount of procaspase-8/10 and c-FLIP in cells exceeds that of FADD by seven to nine folds [29, 30]. Considering that some DD superfamily domains form helical filaments, the DED chain assembly may drive caspase-8 dimerization and activation, leading to cell apoptosis [15, 31, 32].
Structural basis of the DISC
Similar to TNFR1, the transmembrane protein Fas induces cell apoptotic death. When ligand FasL binds to the extracellular domain of Fas, the cytosolic region of Fas recruits FADD via the DD interaction, forming a large complex [21]. FADD in turn engages with caspase-8/10 via the DED interactions. Fas, FADD, and caspase-8/10 form a ternary complex, traditionally named the death inducing signaling complex (DISC), which is essential for Fas-mediated apoptosis [33].
The Fas DD structure reveals an antiparallel six helices bundle, whereas the Fas DD: FADD DD complex shows an oligomeric architecture (Fig. 2d) [21, 33]. Similar to the structures of the DD/DD complexes in the PIDDosome and Myddosome, and the PYD/PYD complex in ALR [15, 18, 23], the class projection averages of EM study reveals that the Fas DD:FADD DD complex has an asymmetric oligomeric structure. Using nanoflow electrospray ionization and tandem mass spectrometry, the complex has been shown to be mostly a mixture of 5 FADD:5 Fas, 5 FADD:6 Fas, and 5 FADD:7 Fas complexes. Mutations associated with autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome in humans directly affected the formation of Fas/FADD complex [21]. As the ripoptosome core RIP1/FADD forms a large complex with high similarity to the DISC, a structural model was proposed for the RIP1/FADD complex (Fig. 2e) [22].
Cell programmed necrosis induced by TNFR1
Cell programmed necrosis, or necroptosis, is referred to the cell death induced by death receptor TNFR1 when both RIP1 dependent NF-kB activation and caspase-8 dependent cell apoptosis are inhibited or blocked. Cell necroptosis is involved in many human diseases, including lymphoproliferative diseases, Crohn’s disease, acute liver injury, ischemic brain injury, and myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury [34]. Cell necroptosis is initiated by the formation of the RIP1/RIP3 necrosome when the NF-kB activation and apoptosis pathways are blocked [35–37]. RIP1 and RIP3 play important roles in host defense against viral and bacteria infections [38–40]. The downstream effectors of cell necroptosis include the mixed lineage kinase like protein (MLKL) and the mitochondrial protein phosphatase PGAM5 [41, 42]. Upon phosphorylation by RIP3, MLKL trimerizes and in turn makes it able to bind phosphatidylinositol phosphates and cardiolipin. Oligomerized MLKL translocates to the plasma membrane and functions directly as a pore or indirectly as an ion channel regulator [43–45]. In contrast to apoptosis, necroptosis can proceed independently of mitochondria [46].
The RIP1/RIP3 necrosome
RIP1 and RIP3 have an N-terminal kinase domain (KD) and a RIP homotypic interaction motif (RHIM), whereas RIP1 has one DD at its C-terminal end (Fig. 3a). RIP1 and RIP3 form a necrotic signaling complex via the RHIM interaction [47, 48]. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that the RIP1/RIP3 necrosome forms an amyloid structure [49]. As the RHIM interaction and kinase activity of RIP1/RIP3 are required for TNF-induced programmed necrosis [35, 49], phosphorylation and necrosome formation may be mutually reinforcing. The amyloid scaffold functions as a crucial platform for recruiting other components, such as MLKL, and triggers the downstream execution of cell necroptosis (Fig. 3b) [49].
The KDs of RIP1 and RIP3 share 33 % sequence identity and 53 % similarity, whereas they have similar 3-D structures [50–52]. The KDs have a typical kinase domain architecture common to other kinases, which is composed of an N-lobe and a C-lobe. Necrostatin is the first identified inhibitor that can specifically inhibit the kinase activity of RIP1, in turn preventing the downstream RIP3 dependent cell necrosis and caspase-8 dependent cell apoptosis. Structures of RIP1 KD bound to necrostatin and its different analogs have revealed that the RIP1 KD is in inactive conformation. The inhibitors are caged in a hydrophobic pocket between the N- and C-lobes, interacting with the highly conserved amino acids in the active loop (Fig. 3c) [52].
As necrostatins have poor pharmacokinetic properties that render them suitable for therapeutic development, Harris et al. developed a series of new kinase inhibitors targeted to the inactive DFG (Asp-Phe-Gly) conformation [53, 54]. The crystal structure of RIP1 with 1-aminoisoquinoline 8 revealed a different inactive conformation with those bound with necrostatins [52, 53]. The 1-aminoisoquinoline heterocycle of 8 forms hydrogen bonds with residues Glu63, Met 95, and Asp156 in the DLG motif, whereas necrostatins bind with Val76, Met92, Asp156, and Ser161 [53].
The RIP3/MLKL kinase complex
MLKL consists of an N-terminal coiled-coil domain and a C-terminal pseudokinase domain [50]. Necrosulfonamide covalently links to Cys86 of MLKL and blocks necrosis downstream of RIP3 activation [41]. The KD of RIP3 and the KD-like domain of MLKL form a stable complex after MLKL is phosphorylated by RIP3 at Ser457 and Thr458.
The structures of RIP3 and MLKL KDs revealed that they adopt the canonical kinase fold (Fig. 3d, e) [51]. The RIP3 KD is an active conformation, whereas MLKL bound RIP3 is in inactive conformation stabilized primarily by nucleotide AMP-PNP located in a pocket close to the P-loop and catalytic loop of RIP3 [51]. Compared to free RIP3, the MLKL-bound RIP3 undergoes a drastic conformation change including shifting of the αC helix and rearrangement of the DFG motif in the activation loop [51]. The movement of the αC helix leads to disruption of the salt bridge between Lys51 and Glu61 in RIP3 (Fig. 3d). On the other hand, a structural comparison of free MLKL and RIP3-bound MLKL revealed dramatic conformational changes involving in the α1 and α4 helices, corresponding to the αC helix and the activation loop in RIP3 KD respectively. The rearrangement of α1/α4 helices and the following loop may facilitate the interaction between RIP3 and MLKL (Fig. 3e).
The full-length MLKL structure reveals that it is composed of a four-helical bundle tethered to the pseudokinase domain (Fig. 3f) [50]. Despite being able to binding ATP, MLKL is catalytically inactive [50]. The N-terminal helical bundle is important for oligomerization of MLKL [43–45]. The C-terminal KD of MLKL adopts a typical kinase-like fold, comprised of a five antiparallel beta strands at the N-lobe, the brace αC helix, and the C-lobe α-helices. Different from canonical kinases, MLKL lacks the typical Asp in the HRD motif of the catalytic loop and the Asp in the DFG motif that is responsible for Mg2+ coordination, which explains the structural basis for the pseudokinase family.
Conclusions
The signal transduction pathway triggered by TNF induces different cell fates. Structural studies on cell apoptosis and programmed necrosis have greatly helped us understand the elaborate mechanism involved in cell signal transduction in innate immunity. The recent progress in studying the DISC, ripoptosome, and necrosome reveals that the high-order signaling machines are involved in many intracellular processes [31]. In addition, the DD superfamily can form helical filaments to execute signal transduction and signal amplification [15, 55]. These higher order structures may open up new avenues for understanding cell signal transduction in innate and adaptive immunity.
References
Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M (2010) Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell 140(6):883–899
Aggarwal BB (2003) Signalling pathways of the TNF superfamily: a double-edged sword. Nat Rev Immunol 3(9):745–756
Bodmer JL, Schneider P, Tschopp J (2002) The molecular architecture of the TNF superfamily. Trends Biochem Sci 27(1):19–26
Haas TL et al (2009) Recruitment of the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex stabilizes the TNF-R1 signaling complex and is required for TNF-mediated gene induction. Mol Cell 36(5):831–844
Walczak H (2011) TNF and ubiquitin at the crossroads of gene activation, cell death, inflammation, and cancer. Immunol Rev 244(1):9–28
Ofengeim D, Yuan J (2013) Regulation of RIP1 kinase signalling at the crossroads of inflammation and cell death. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14(11):727–736
Deng L et al (2000) Activation of the IkappaB kinase complex by TRAF6 requires a dimeric ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme complex and a unique polyubiquitin chain. Cell 103(2):351–361
Hayden MS, Ghosh S (2014) Regulation of NF-kappaB by TNF family cytokines. Semin Immunol 26(3):253–266
Moquin D, Chan FK (2010) The molecular regulation of programmed necrotic cell injury. Trends Biochem Sci 35(8):434–441
Bertrand MJ et al (2008) cIAP1 and cIAP2 facilitate cancer cell survival by functioning as E3 ligases that promote RIP1 ubiquitination. Mol Cell 30(6):689–700
Wang L, Du F, Wang X (2008) TNF-alpha induces two distinct caspase-8 activation pathways. Cell 133(4):693–703
Tenev T et al (2011) The ripoptosome, a signaling platform that assembles in response to genotoxic stress and loss of IAPs. Mol Cell 43(3):432–448
Ferrao R et al (2012) Structural insights into the assembly of large oligomeric signalosomes in the toll-like receptor-interleukin-1 receptor superfamily. Sci Signal 5(226):re3
Ferrao R, Wu H (2012) Helical assembly in the death domain (DD) superfamily. Curr Opin Struct Biol 22(2):241–247
Lu A et al (2014) Unified polymerization mechanism for the assembly of ASC-dependent inflammasomes. Cell 156(6):1193–1206
Carrington PE et al (2006) The structure of FADD and its mode of interaction with procaspase-8. Mol Cell 22(5):599–610
Strasser A, Jost PJ, Nagata S (2009) The many roles of FAS receptor signaling in the immune system. Immunity 30(2):180–192
Park HH et al (2007) Death domain assembly mechanism revealed by crystal structure of the oligomeric PIDDosome core complex. Cell 128(3):533–546
Eberstadt M et al (1998) NMR structure and mutagenesis of the FADD (Mort1) death-effector domain. Nature 392(6679):941–945
Jeong EJ et al (1999) The solution structure of FADD death domain. Structural basis of death domain interactions of Fas and FADD. J Biol Chem 274(23):16337–16342
Wang L et al (2010) The Fas-FADD death domain complex structure reveals the basis of DISC assembly and disease mutations. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17(11):1324–1329
Jang TH et al (2014) Structural Study of the RIPoptosome core reveals a helical assembly for kinase recruitment. Biochemistry 53(33):5424–5431
Lin SC, Lo YC, Wu H (2010) Helical assembly in the MyD88-IRAK4-IRAK2 complex in TLR/IL-1R signalling. Nature 465(7300):885–890
Blanchard H et al (1999) The three-dimensional structure of caspase-8: an initiator enzyme in apoptosis. Structure 7(9):1125–1133
Watt W et al (1999) The atomic-resolution structure of human caspase-8, a key activator of apoptosis. Structure 7(9):1135–1143
Siegel RM et al (1998) Death-effector filaments: novel cytoplasmic structures that recruit caspases and trigger apoptosis. J Cell Biol 141(5):1243–1253
Li FY et al (2006) Crystal structure of a viral FLIP: insights into FLIP-mediated inhibition of death receptor signaling. J Biol Chem 281(5):2960–2968
Yang JK et al (2005) Crystal structure of MC159 reveals molecular mechanism of DISC assembly and FLIP inhibition. Mol Cell 20(6):939–949
Dickens LS et al (2012) A death effector domain chain DISC model reveals a crucial role for caspase-8 chain assembly in mediating apoptotic cell death. Mol Cell 47(2):291–305
Schleich K et al (2012) Stoichiometry of the CD95 death-inducing signaling complex: experimental and modeling evidence for a death effector domain chain model. Mol Cell 47(2):306–319
Wu H (2013) Higher-order assemblies in a new paradigm of signal transduction. Cell 153(2):287–292
Qiao Q et al (2013) Structural architecture of the CARMA1/Bcl10/MALT1 signalosome: nucleation-induced filamentous assembly. Mol Cell 51(6):766–779
Kischkel FC et al (1995) Cytotoxicity-dependent APO-1 (Fas/CD95)-associated proteins form a death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) with the receptor. EMBO J 14(22):5579–5588
Li J, Yin Q, Wu H (2013) Structural basis of signal transduction in the TNF receptor superfamily. Adv Immunol 119:135–153
Cho YS et al (2009) Phosphorylation-driven assembly of the RIP1-RIP3 complex regulates programmed necrosis and virus-induced inflammation. Cell 137(6):1112–1123
He S et al (2009) Receptor interacting protein kinase-3 determines cellular necrotic response to TNF-alpha. Cell 137(6):1100–1111
Zhang DW et al (2009) RIP3, an energy metabolism regulator that switches TNF-induced cell death from apoptosis to necrosis. Science 325(5938):332–336
Robinson N et al (2012) Type I interferon induces necroptosis in macrophages during infection with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Nat Immunol 13(10):954–962
Upton JW, Kaiser WJ, Mocarski ES (2010) Virus inhibition of RIP3-dependent necrosis. Cell Host Microbe 7(4):302–313
Upton JW, Kaiser WJ, Mocarski ES (2012) DAI/ZBP1/DLM-1 complexes with RIP3 to mediate virus-induced programmed necrosis that is targeted by murine cytomegalovirus vIRA. Cell Host Microbe 11(3):290–297
Sun L et al (2012) Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein mediates necrosis signaling downstream of RIP3 kinase. Cell 148(1–2):213–227
Zhao J et al (2012) Mixed lineage kinase domain-like is a key receptor interacting protein 3 downstream component of TNF-induced necrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(14):5322–5327
Cai Z et al (2014) Plasma membrane translocation of trimerized MLKL protein is required for TNF-induced necroptosis. Nat Cell Biol 16(1):55–65
Wang H et al (2014) Mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein MLKL causes necrotic membrane disruption upon phosphorylation by RIP3. Mol Cell 54(1):133–146
Chen X et al (2014) Translocation of mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein to plasma membrane leads to necrotic cell death. Cell Res 24(1):105–121
Blander JM (2014) A long-awaited merger of the pathways mediating host defence and programmed cell death. Nat Rev Immunol 14(9):601–618
Sun X et al (1999) RIP3, a novel apoptosis-inducing kinase. J Biol Chem 274(24):16871–16875
Sun X et al (2002) Identification of a novel homotypic interaction motif required for the phosphorylation of receptor-interacting protein (RIP) by RIP3. J Biol Chem 277(11):9505–9511
Li J et al (2012) The RIP1/RIP3 necrosome forms a functional amyloid signaling complex required for programmed necrosis. Cell 150(2):339–350
Murphy JM et al (2013) The pseudokinase MLKL mediates necroptosis via a molecular switch mechanism. Immunity 39(3):443–453
Xie T et al (2013) Structural insights into RIP3-mediated necroptotic signaling. Cell Rep 5(1):70–78
Xie T et al (2013) Structural basis of RIP1 inhibition by necrostatins. Structure 21(3):493–499
Harris PA et al (2013) Discovery of small molecule RIP1 kinase inhibitors for the treatment of pathologies associated with necroptosis. ACS Med Chem Lett 4(12):1238–1243
Kufareva I, Abagyan R (2008) Type-II kinase inhibitor docking, screening, and profiling using modified structures of active kinase states. J Med Chem 51(24):7921–7932
Wu B et al (2013) Structural basis for dsRNA recognition, filament formation, and antiviral signal activation by MDA5. Cell 152(1–2):276–289
Acknowledgments
We apologize for incomplete citations due to space limitations. The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31470724 to J.L.) and the National Basic Research Program of China (2015CB943300 to J.L.).