Abstract
We investigated the effects of switching from conventional management to organic management on the abundance and community composition of soil-living oribatid mites in clover fields in an experimental agricultural station at Al-Fayoum, Egypt. The site had two adjacent fields with identical vegetation cover but different management. Fifteen random soil samples were collected monthly from each of three plots per field, from October to March. We characterized the soils with respect to various physicochemical variables as well as fungal community composition, and estimated mite densities through core sampling. Organic fields had a significantly more abundant oribatid community than did conventional fields. Also the abundance of soil fungi was greater in the organically managed field. Organic management promoted common oribatid mite species with a wide ecological amplitude that already had a high abundance where such common species are more responsive to changes in agricultural management. However, some species of mite responded indifferent or negative to the switch from conventional to organic management. Overall, the differences between the two ecological systems were mainly quantitative. Species diversities of both mite and fungal communities did not differ much between the two management systems. Diversity (H′) and equitability (E) of soil oribatid communities were higher in conventional plots than in the organic plots during the first 2 months but indistinguishable thereafter. Our study confirmed that organic management stimulates soil organic matter build-up, with positive effects on both fungal and oribatid mite abundance and possible long-term effects on soil function.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Compared to conventional farming, organic soil management can substantially improve soil structure, especially in terms of organic matter, soil aggregate stability and soil pore characteristics. The beneficial effects of organic farming are said to include better recycling of organic waste, reduced use of synthetic chemicals, reduced incidence of pests and diseases, improvement of plant and animal quality, reduced erosion and run-off, as well as ecological benefits, e.g. greater soil organism diversity (Hole et al. 2005; Papadopoulos et al. 2014). Under intensive conventional farming, soil physical properties can become severely degraded (Conacher and Conacher 1995). The benefits to soil physical properties of adding organic matter and applying good management practices are well documented (Russell and Isbell 1986; Hamblin and Kyneur 1993; Nesbitt and Adl 2014). Soil pH, C:N ratio, particle distribution, bulk density, and soil moisture are often used as indicators for such changes. For example, an enhancement in such soil physical properties was found in an 18-year biodynamic dairy farm in Victoria (Australia) compared to a conventional farm (Lytton-Hitchins et al. 1994). A study in New Zealand by Reganold et al. (1993) supported these findings. However, the improvements are conditional on soil type, climate, regional factors, past land use, types rates of soil amendments and/or practices (Papadopoulos et al. 2014).
In addition to effects on soil physical properties organic management may also support a higher abundance of soil microbes and soil animals. The abundance and diversity of soil animals is often adversely affected by conventional agricultural practices, such as clearing and cultivation (Abbott et al. 1979; Roper and Gupta 1995), and by the use of chemical fertilizers (Marshall 1977) and pesticides (Jackson 1983). Increases in soil biomass and biological abundance, diversity and activity are directly related to increased levels of organic matter and good management practices which, in turn, positively influence soil structure, nutrient cycling and availability, buffering capacity, and pest and disease control in conventional systems (Dick 1992; Pankhurst et al.1997). In semi-arid environments, the role of ants and termites (Lobry de Bruyn and Conacher 1990, 1995) and the importance of litter and organic matter (Spain and Huston 1983) should not be underestimated. Under organic or alternative systems, soil organism abundance and activity have often been found to be superior to those in their conventional counterparts (Fraser et al. 1988; Ryan et al. 1994). However, Daniel et al. (1994) and Penfold (1994) were not able to demonstrate any marked differences between the systems, possibly due to a short period of sampling as well as other factors.
The main goal of the present study was to test the expectation that conversion from conventional to organic farming has a positive effect on the abundance and community structure of soil oribatid mites. We pay particular attention to (1) the responses of the most dominant oribatid species, and (2) the relationships between soil microbial and physicochemical parameters versus oribatid mite abundance that would be valid over both managed cultivation systems.
Materials and methods
Sampling and site description
The experiment ran from October 2012 till March 2013. The experimental station was at Abshway village, Al-Fayoum Governorate, North of Cairo, Egypt. The experimental field (about 2.5 ha) had been cultivated with a variety of crops, including clover, wheat, maize, sunflower and cotton for more than 30 years, in a conventional cropping system. Since 2004, organic farming was established in half of the area (1.25 ha). The application of compost was performed manually every year since 2004 at day 15 before sowing. The added quantity was equivalent to 28.5 m3 per ha. In each field [organic managed system (OMS) and conventional managed system (CMS)], three independent plots (each 40 × 40 m) were laid out with 25 m between them. During sampling, the two fields (OMS and CMS) had uniform vegetation (clover, Trifolium alexandrinum). The experimental organic field was designated as Zafer, code number AO 16 and registered in the Egyptian Center of Organic Agriculture ECOA with international accreditation from EU DAKKAS. Minimum tillage was applied under organic management, however all conventional fields were ploughed. Weed control was performed mechanically in OMS; however, in CMS two herbicides were used: Basagran (active ingredient: bentazon, emulsifiable concentrate 48 %, from BASF), and Fusilade (a.i.: fluazifop-P-butyl, EC 12.5 %, from Syngenta). Herbicide treatments were applied 3× to each plot.
To assess abundance of soil microarthropods, 15 random soil subsamples were collected monthly from each plot (in total 90 samples a month from the two fields).The peripheral edges of the plots were excluded from the sampling scheme to minimize possible edge effects. Sampling was conducted by means of a rectangular metal sampler (10 × 10 cm, driven in the soil to a depth of 12 cm). Soil microarthropod fauna was extracted from the samples using modified Tullgren funnels as described elsewhere (Al-Assiuty et al. 1993). Under the microscope, oribatid mites were separated from other microarthropods, preserved and identified according to Ghilarov and Krivolutsky (1975), Balogh and Balogh (1992) and Subías and Arillo (2001).
Physicochemical and microbial analyses
The analyses of physicochemical and microbial parameters were carried out on ten fresh replicates of subsamples. Before mite extraction from soil samples of each treatment, 10 g fresh soil was taken from each of the field samples during full canopy closure (45 per three plots) then mixed well and we choose ten samples from soil mixture of each treatment to be analyzed.
Organic matter content (OM %) was determined using a muffle furnace at 600 °C for 4 h. The loss in soil sample weight represents the weight of the total organic content which was estimated as a percentage of the dry weight of soil sample. Soil moisture (SM %) was calculated as water loss/soil dry weight. Carbon (C %) and nitrogen (N %) in soil samples were analyzed on a Termo Finnigan Flash EA 1112 Series NC analyzer to determine total C and N. The pH values of the CaCl2-extracts were measured for all soil samples using a Consort p907 pH meter. Pore volume (PV) was calculated using Keen–Raczkowski Box methods used by Sankaram (1966).
The following microbial parameters were measured: microbial biomass (MB, using the fumigation-extraction method according to Joergensen, 1996), fungal density (FD, colony forming units, CFU per ml), relative contribution of fungal species (rc, % of total number of isolates), fungal species richness (FDI, number of species), number of dominant fungal species (FDS, species representing 5 % or more of the total number of isolates) and fungal species preferred by oribatid mites (PF, identified from other studies, e.g. Afifi, 2010). Fungi were isolated according to Malloch (1997), Warcup (1985), Paul and Clark (1988), and Swanson et al. (1992). One gram from each soil sample was transferred to a sterile test tube containing 10 ml of sterilized distilled water (1:10 dilution), using a flame-sterilized steel spatula. Subsequently, serial solutions were prepared. One ml of each dilution was spread on Petri dishes (9 cm diameter) containing well-dried potato-dextrose agar (PDA). The plates were incubated at 28 ± 2 °C for 3–5 days. Colonies of fungi that developed on the PDA plates were counted as CFU. Discrete fungal colonies were sub-cultured onto fresh medium containing PDA at 50 mg/L (Hansen 1926). Isolated fungi were identified and recorded according to Gilman (1957), Domsch et al. (1980) and Moubasher (1993).
Data analysis
Population densities of oribatid mites were expressed as numbers per m2. Dominance classification was evaluated according to Engelmann (1978). Concentration of dominance was assessed according to Odum (1971) using C′ = ∑(ni/N)2, where ni is the number of individuals per species and N is the total number of all species. Similarities between the treatments were assessed according to Magurran (2004) using Qs = 2 J/a + b as a qualitative measure (where J is the number of shared species in both fields, a is the number of species in field A and b is the number of species in field B) and CN = 2jN/(aN + bN) as a quantitative measure (aN is the number of individuals in field A, bN is the number of individuals in field B and jN is the sum of the lower of the two abundances of shared species in the two fields).
Species diversity values were evaluated using the Shannon–Wiener function (H′) using H = −∑PiInPi and E = H′/InS, where H′ is the diversity index, E is the equitability, Pi is the number of individuals in the i-th species and S is the total number of species. Statistical comparison of Shannon–Wiener function (H′) values in two communities could be made using the t test according to Jayaraman (1999) where t = (H′1–H′2)/S H′1 − H′2, where S H′1 − H′2 is the square root of variance \( \left( {{\text{S}}^{2}_{\text{H}} } \right) \) of the Shannon–Wiener index for each community. To express the linear relationships between OM content and PV, MB and C %, regression analysis was applied using the linear regression equation Y′ = a + bX where b indicates the average changes in dependent variables for each change of one unit in the independent variables.
A two–way repeated measures ANOVA was applied with management (two levels) as a fixed block factor, time (6 levels), as a repeat-measure fixed factor, and plot as random replicates (IBM SPSS v.19). To fulfill criteria of normal distribution and homogeneity of variances the abundance data were \( \sqrt {\left( {x + 1} \right)} \) transformed. T test was applied to compare the data of physicochemical and microbial analysis after testing the data for normality (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, software Min tab v.16).
Results
Physicochemical and microbial analysis
Table 1 shows that except for the C/N ratio, all physicochemical and microbial variables differed between the organic management system (OMS) and the conventional management system (CMS). Organic matter content and organic carbon varied considerably between OMS and CMS plots (4.7 and 1.7 % compared to 2.9 and 1.3 %, respectively.(Total nitrogen tended to be greater in OMS than in CMS. Soil pH was slightly alkaline (7.4) in OMS plots and was significantly higher in CMS plots where pH was around 7.7. Soil moisture content was low at the time of sampling, but there was still a statistically significant difference between CMS and OMS plots. Pore volume of the soil was significantly greater in the organic plots than in conventional plots (Fig. 1a), and there was a positive correlation between pore volume and organic matter content in OMS (r = 0.894, t = 5.631, p < 0.05); however, in CMS, this correlation was not significant (r = 0.598, t = 2.109, p > 0.05). Microbial biomass was significantly greater in OMS than in CMS (Table 1). The higher microbial biomass in OMS is consistent with its higher organic carbon content (Fig. 1b); there was a positive correlation between microbial biomass and organic carbon (r = 0.813, t = 3.950, p < 0.05) in OMS, but not in the case of CMS (r = 0.393, t = 1.212, p > 0.05). The ratio of microbial biomass over organic carbon was considerably higher in OMS (6.6) than in CMS (3.9).
Our survey of the fungal communities isolated from soil samples (Table 2) showed that the genus Aspergillus and the species Trichoderma viride dominated in both plots, whereas Rhizoctonia solani, Alterrnaria alternate and Cladosporium cladosporioides were found to be more abundant in OMS. Curvularia lunatus occurred with high frequency in CMS plots. Fungal density (CFU) was significantly higher in OMS than in CMS (Table 1). Likewise, the fungal species diversity of the two community systems was higher in OMS than in CMS (t = 11.119, p < 0.001).
The qualitative similarity (relative species composition, rsc) of the fungal community between the two managed systems (CMS and OMS) was high (79 %); however, the quantitative similarity between them was relatively low (38.2 %). Accordingly, the difference between the fungal communities resides in the general abundance of fungi rather than in species composition of the community.
Mite abundance and community structure
The total population density of soil oribatids varied widely (3080–7253 individuals per m2) between the two management systems (Fig. 2). A two-way repeated measures ANOVA indicated that land management had a highly significant effect on mite abundance (F1,17 = 58.60, p < 0.001). The analysis also revealed a significant effect of sampling time (F5,13 = 19.72, p < 0.001), and a significant interaction between management and sampling time (F5,13 = 14.23, p < 0.001). These significances are illustrated by Fig. 2, which shows that under both management systems the number of mites reached a peak in December, but the fluctuations in time did not follow the same pattern, explaining the significant interaction between time and management.
A total of 13 species were counted from the organically managed soils through all sampling dates, whereas 17 species were collected from the conventionally managed system. Scheloribates laevigatus was most frequently found (in 86 and 80 % of the samples) and was most abundant (constituting 30 and 61 % of the total number of individuals) in organically and conventionally managed systems, respectively. With respect to dominance classification (Table 3), the oribatid fauna from organic plots had one species, S. laevigatus, classified as eudominant (30.6 % of the total number of individuals) and three species classified as dominant, Lamellobates h. aegyptica (28.3 %), Aegyptogalumna mastigophora (17.7 %) and Tectocepheus v. velatus (16.5 %). In the conventionally managed system S. laevigatus was also eudominant, with a high contribution of individuals (54 %), whereas only one species, Zygoribatula exarata, was subdominant (9.6 %). Thus, the degree of dominance in CMS was higher than that in OMS (0.32 vs. 0.23). The qualitative similarity of community composition (pooled over all months) between the two managed systems (OMS and CMS) was 80 %. This contrasts with the quantitative resemblance between them being only 41.4 %.
The most commonly encountered oribatid species were Rhysotritia a. ardua, Epilohmannia c. cylindrica, Oppiella nova, T. v. velatus, L. h. aegyptica, S. laevigatus, Scheloribates pallidilus, Z. exarata and A. mastigophora. A substantial amount of variation was observed among the oribatid fauna within the plots, but the most important source of variation was between the two fields, i.e., between the organic and conventional managed systems.Three trends in the abundances of the most common oribatid species associated with management changes could be distinguished: (1) more abundant in CMS than in OMS: E. c. cylindrica, O. nova, Z. exarata and S. pallidilus; (2) more abundant in OMS than in CMS: T. v. velatus, L. h. aegyptica, S. laevigatus and A. mastigophora; and (3) with a time-dependent response, not consistent over the sampling times, overall indifferent to management: R. a. ardua and Xylobates capucinus.
In contrast to the absolute numbers, species diversity of the communities differed between the two management systems (t = 4.179, p < 0.001). Figure 3 shows that Shannon–Wiener diversity (H′) in conventional plots was higher than in organic plots only in the first 2 months, October and November; thereafter the diversities were more or less indistinguishable. The H′ values in CMS fluctuated more strongly over time than H′ in OMS, which indicated a rather steady value over all sampling times.
Discussion
Our experimental field design was not optimal because treatments were not replicated over several blocks. On the other hand we repeated the sampling 6 × and added information through analyzing physicochemical and microbial habitat characteristics. In comparing the two fields, it has to be assumed that the differences between them should be attributed to the differences in long-term agricultural practices (Holland et al. 1994). Indeed, large-scale experiments are difficult to replicate. Our study demonstrated that organic farming exerts a significant effect on various physicochemical soil variables, most notably an enhancement of soil organic matter and soil organic carbon content. Both mites and fungi profited from the greater abundance of resources available in organically managed soils. However, this positive effect was not observed for species diversity, or in mites and fungi. The differences between organically management systems and conventional systems were mainly quantitative, whereas the similarity of fungi and oribatid community structure remained large.
Microbial biomass, fungal density, soil moisture and pore volume seem to be the most important factors which promote a higher abundance of mites. Our results are consistent with those of Foissner (1992), Maraun et al. (1998), Coulis et al. (2013) and Al-Assiuty (2014) who found that soil moisture content and microbial biomass were the most important factors affecting the oribatid abundance.
The main difference between the organic and conventional regimes was that under OMS, tillage before planting was minimal and no herbicides were used, whereas CMS fields were ploughed and received two herbicides (Basagran and Fusilade). The lack of herbicide use in OMS led to an increase in weed cover which possibly created a favorable microclimate, e.g. by maintaining a higher humidity in the uppermost layer of soil (Moreby et al. 1994). The abundance and diversity of predatory arthropods within a field has been shown to be closely related to the nature of the surrounding vegetation (Wratten and Thomas 1990; Wratten and Van Emden 1995). Therefore, the frequent application of herbicides in conventional farming systems can reduce plant diversity within the whole agro-ecosystem, and this may reduce populations of beneficial arthropods.
The increase in oribatid mite abundance under organic farming was greatest for those species that already had a high abundance, e.g. T. v. velatus, A. mastigophora, L. h. aegyptica and S. laevigatus. These species are known for their wide ecological amplitude and apparently profit most from increased availability of resources. In contrasts to the main trend, three species of mite showed a lower abundance in the organically farmed field compared to conventional management, viz. E. c. cylindrica, O. nova and Z. exarata. This could be due to competitive pressure and inter-specific differences in sensitivity. Khalil et al. (2009) have indicated that sensitive oribatid species may be replaced by resistant ones without changing the total oribatid mites.
Various studies have reported effects of organic farming on soil-living communities. Several studies demonstrate a higher diversity of certain groups of invertebrates in organic than in conventionally managed fields, e.g. carabid beetles (Kromp 1999; Langmaack et al. 2001), spiders (Feber et al. 1998) and earthworms (Paoletti, 1999b). However, other studies indicate no difference in diversity under organic farming, e.g. Berry et al. (1996) and Blackburn and Arthur (2001) for centipede communities. Physical disturbance of soil, such as tillage, usually has a detrimental effect on the diversity of the soil fauna, especially earthworms (Altieri 1999). However, negative effects of intensive cultivation have also been reported for microarthropods. Alvarez et al. (2001) indicated that the pre-drilling differences in crop management had a significant effect on soil Collembola abundance under an integrated and conventional regime. Soil mite populations were reduced by deep ploughing and the use of heavy machinery (Osler et al. 2008).
Hole et al. (2005) reviewed ten studies that investigated arthropod taxa associated with organic farming, three focusing exclusively on arthropods. Overall the results of all ten studies suggested that organic farming promoted a greater abundance and diversity of arthropods than conventional systems. Minor and Norton (2004) found that compost had a greater effect on mite diversity than chemical fertilizer although both treatments reduced the diversity. Organic farming can lead to higher populations and species diversity of beneficial arthropods (Dritschilo and Wanner 1980; Hokkanen and Holopainen 1986; Kromp 1989; Booij and Noorlander 1992; Moreby et al. 1994).
The generally positive effects of organic farming on soil-living invertebrates are not always easily demonstrable in the studies reported in the literature. This may be due to the fact that population dynamics of soil organisms in agricultural systems depend on a range of factors, such as soil characteristics, climate, type of crop, etc. (Debeljak et al. 2007). Organic farming typically uses long rotations, low tillage, cover crops, and manure or compost amendments, whereas synthetic fertilizers and pesticides are not used. Ecological responses of soil fauna may depend on a combination of several such interacting factors rather than on a single aspect of the management.
A consistently higher abundance of soil animals may also have positive effects on soil functioning. For this reason, soil animals are frequently used as bioindicators for assessing the effect of landscape management and soil quality (Paoletti 1999a). Teuben and Roelofsma (1990) indicated that the functioning of microorganisms was influenced by abiotic factors, substrate quality and biotic components such as soil arthropods. Soil animals change the physical properties of detritus and the chemical quality by gut passage (Gunnarson and Tunlid 1986), selective grazing (Newell 1984) and dispersal of microbial propagules (Visser, 1985). Also, Maraun et al. (1998) demonstrated that oribatid mites accelerate the recovery of the microbial community and are of significant importance for the resilience of the decomposition subsystem. Azarbad et al. (2013) observed a pollution-induced decrease in microbial activity which resulted from both decreased microbial biomass and negative alterations in the metabolism of bacteria and fungi.
In conclusion, the two managed ecological systems showed a clear influence on the population dynamics of oribatid mite species; there was a significantly higher mean number of oribatid mites in the organic system than in the conventional system. This was accompanied by a general increase of soil microbial biomass and fungal abundance. Our study showed that a more sustainable use of agricultural soils may contribute to the protection of a healthy decomposer community, with long-term ecological benefits.
References
Abbott I, Parker CA, Sills ID (1979) Changes in the abundance of larger soil animals and physical properties of soil following cultivation. Aust J Soil Res 17:343–453
Afifi HMF (2010) Oribatid mite fungus interaction with special reference to the effect of metal contaminated fungi as food item on the oribatid mite population M Sc Thesis Fac. Sci. Tanta University Egypt, Egypt
Al-Assiuty BA (2014) New approaches to environmental assessment in biodynamic agriculture: mite-microorganism interaction as a biological control system. Ph D Thesis Fac. Sci. Tanta University, Egypt
Al-Assiuty AIM, Bayoumi BM, Khalil MA, Van Straalen NM (1993) The influence of vegetational type on seasonal abundance and species composition of soil fauna at different localities in Egypt. Pedobiologia 37:210–222
Altieri MA (1999) The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:9–31
Alvarez T, Frampton GK, Goulson D (2001) Epigeic Collembola in winter wheat under organic, integrated and conventional farm management regimes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 83:93–110
Azarbad H, Niklinska M, Van Gestel CAM, Van Straalen NM, Röling WFM, Laskowski R (2013) Microbial community structure and functioning along metal pollution gradients. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:1992–2002
Balogh J, Balogh P (1992) The Oribatid Mites Genera of the World. Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest Vol I263 pp, Vol. II
Berry NA, Wratten SD, McErlich A, Frampton C (1996) Abundance and diversity of beneficial arthropods in conventional and organic carrot crops in New Zealand. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci 24:307–313
Blackburn J, Arthur W (2001) Comparative abundance of centipedes on organic and conventional farms, and its possible relation to declines in farmland bird populations. Basic Appl Ecol 2:373–381
Booij CJH, Noorlander J (1992) Farming systems and insect predators. Agric Ecosyst Environ 40:125–135
Conacher A, Conacher J (1995) Rural land degradation in Australia. Oxford University Press, Melbourne
Coulis M, Hattenschwiler N, Fromin N, David JF (2013) Microarthropod-microorganism interactions during the decomposition of Mediterranean shrub litter at different moisture levels. Soil Biol Biochem 64:114–121
Daniel A, Small D, Saffigna P (1994) Comparison of microbial biomass levels on irrigated dairy farms as influenced by biodynamic and conventional farming systems. Paper presented at unternational symposium on Environmental agriculture towards 2000, Gold Coast, Queensland, June, 1994, p 73
Debeljak M, Cortet J, Demsar D, Krogh PH, Dzeroski S (2007) Hierarchical classification of environmental factors and agricultural practices affecting soil fauna under cropping systems using Bt maize. Pedobiologia 51:229–238
Dick RP (1992) A review: long-term effects of agricultural systems on soils biochemical and microbial parameters. Agric Ecosyst Environ 40:25–36
Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson TH (1980) Compendium of Soil Fungi, vol 1. Academic Press, London, 859 pp
Dritschilo W, Wanner D (1980) Ground beetle abundance in organic and conventional corn fields. Environ Entomol 9:629–631
Engelmann HD (1978) Zur Dominanzklassifizierung von Bodenarthropoden. Pedobiologia 18:378–380
Feber RE, Bell J, Johnson PJ, Firbank LG, Macdonald DW (1998) The effects of organic farming on surface-active spider (Araneae) assemblages in wheat in southern England, UK. J Arachnol 26:190–202
Foissner W (1992) Comparative studies on the soil life in ecofarmed and conventionally farmed fields and grasslands of Austria. Agric Ecosyst Environ 40:207–218
Fraser DG, Doran JW, Sahs WW, Lesoing GW (1988) Soil microbial-populations and activities under conventional and organic management. J Environ Qual 17:585–590
Ghilarov MS, Krivolutsky DA (1975) Identification of Soil Mites, Sarcoptiformes. Moscow, IzdNauka (in Russian)
Gilman JC (1957) A manual of soil fungi. The Iowa State College Press, Iowa, 450 pp
Gunnarson T, Tunlid A (1986) Recycling of fecal pellets in isopods: microorganisms and nitrogen compounds as potential food for Oniscus asellus L. Soil Biol Biochem 18:595–600
Hamblin A, Kyneur G (1993) Trends in wheat yields and soil fertility in Australia Bureau of Resource Sciences. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra
Hansen HN (1926) A simple method of obtaining single spore culture. Science 64:1384–1659
Hokkanen H, Holopainen JK (1986) Carabid species and activity densities in biologically and conventionally managed cabbage fields. J Appl Entomol 102:353–363
Hole DG, Perkins AJ, Wilson JD, Alexander IH, Grice PV, Evans AD (2005) Does organic farming benefit biodiversity? Biol Conserv 122:113–130
Holland JM, Frampton GK, Cilgi T, Wratten SD (1994) Arable farming systems in Western Europe. Ann Appl Biol 125:399–438
Jackson RB (1983) Pesticide residues in soils. In Soils: an Australian viewpoint. CSIRO, Melbourne/Academic Press, London, pp 825–842
Jayaraman K (1999) A statistical manual for forestry research. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations regional office for Asia and the Pacific Bangkok
Joergensen RG (1996) The fumigation–extraction method to estimate soil microbial biomass: calibration of the KEC values. Soil Biol Biochem 28:25–31
Khalil MA, Janssens TKS, Berg MP, Van Straalen NM (2009) Identification of metal-responsive oribatid mites in a comparative survey of polluted sites. Pedobiologia 52:207–221
Kromp B (1989) Carabid beetle communities (Carabidae, Coleoptera) in biologically and conventionally farmed agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 27:241–251
Kromp B (1999) Carabid beetles in sustainable agriculture: a review on pest control efficacy, cultivation impacts and enhancement. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:187–228
Langmaack M, Land S, Buchs W (2001) Effects of different field management systems on the carabidcoenosis in oil seed rape with special respect to ecology and nutritional status of predacious Poecilus cupreus L. (Col., Carabidae). J Appl Entomol 125:313–320
Lobry de Bruyn LA, Conacher AJ (1990) The role of ants and termites in soil modification: a review. Aust J Soil Res 28:55–93
Lobry de Bruyn LA, Conacher AJ (1995) Soil modification by termites in the central wheatbelt of Western Australia. Aust J Soil Res 33:179–193
Lytton-Hitchins JA, Koppi AJ, McBratney AB (1994) The soil condition of adjacent bio-dynamic and conventionally managed dairy pastures in Victoria, Australia. Soil Use Manag 10:74–87
Magurran AE (2004) Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Science, Oxford, 256 pp
Malloch D (1997) Moulds isolation, cultivation and identification. Dept Botany. University Tornato, USA
Maraun M, Visser V, Scheu S (1998) Oribatid mites enhance the recovery of the microbial community after a strong disturbance. Appl Soil Ecol 9:175–181
Marshall VG (1977) Effects of manures and fertilizers on soil fauna: a review. Commonwealth Bureau of Soils, Special publication no. 3. CAB, Farnham Royal, UK, 79 pp
Minor MA, Norton RA (2004) Effects of soil amendments on assemblages of soil mites (Acari: Oribatida, Mesostigmata) in short-rotation willow plantings in central New York. Can J Forest Res 34:1417–1425
Moreby SJ, Aebischer NJ, Southway SE, Sotherton NW (1994) A comparison of the flora and arthropod fauna of organically and conventionally grown winter-wheat in southern England. Ann Appl Biol 125:13–27
Moubasher A (1993) Soil fungi in Qater and other Arab countries. Uni-Qater Center for Scientific and Applied Research
Nesbitt JE, Adl SM (2014) Differences in soil quality indicators between organic and sustainably managed potato fields in Eastern Canada. Ecol Indic 37:119–130
Newell K (1984) Interaction between two decomposer basidiomycetes and a collembolan under Sitka spruce: distribution, abundance and selective grazing. Soil Biol Biochem 16:227–233
Odum EP (1971) Fundamentals of ecology. W B Saunders Co, Philadelphia
Osler GHR, Harrison L, Kanashiro DK, Clapperton MJ (2008) Soil microarthropod assemblages under different arable crop rotations in Alberta, Canada. Appl Soil Ecol 38:71–78
Pankhurst CE, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR, Grace PR (1997) Soil Biota: management in sustainable farming systems. CSIRO, Australia
Paoletti MG (1999a) Using bioindicators based on biodiversity to assess landscape sustainability. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:1–18
Paoletti MG (1999b) The role of earthworms for assessment of sustainability and as bioindicators. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:137–155
Papadopoulos A, Bird NRA, Whitmore AP, Mooney SJ (2014) Does organic management lead to enhanced soil physical quality? Geoderma 213:435–443
Paul EA, Clark FE (1988) Soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press Inc, New York
Penfold C (1994) Broadcare organic farming. Internal report. University of Adelaida, Roseworthy Campus, Roseworthy, South Australia
Reganold JP, Palmer AS, Lockhart JC, Macgregor AN (1993) Soil quality and financial performance of biodynamic and conventional farms in New Zealand. Science 260:344–349
Roper MM, Gupta VVSR (1995) Management practices and soil biota. Aust J Soil Res 33:321–339
Russell JS, Isbell RF (1986) Australian soils: the human impact. University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, Brisbane
Ryan MH, Chilvers GA, Dumaresq DC (1994) Colonisation of wheat by VA-mycorrhizal fungi was found to be higher on a farm managed in an organic manner than on a conventional neighbour. Plant Soil 160:33–40
Sankaram A (1966) A laboratory manual for agricultural chemistry. Asia Publ. House, Bombay
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman Co, San Francisco
Spain AV, Huston BR (1983) Dynamics and fauna of the litter layer. In Soils: an Australian viewpoint. CSIRO, Melbourne/Academic Press, London, pp 611–628
Subías LS, Arillo A (2001) Fauna Iberica. Meseu Nacional de Ciencias Naturales. CSIS Madrid Spain, AcariOribatei, Gymnonota II
Swanson KM, Busta FF, Peterson EH, Johnson ME (1992) Colony count methods. In: Vanderzant C, Splitstoesser DS (eds) Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of food. American Public Health Association, New York, pp 74–95
Teuben A, Roelofsma TAPJ (1990) Dynamic interactions between functional groups of soil arthropods and microorganisms during decomposition of coniferous litter in microcosm experiments. Bio Fertil Soil 9:145–151
Visser S (1985) Role of the soil invertebrates in determining the composition of soil microbial communities. In: Fitter AH, Atkinson D, Read D, User MB (eds) Ecological interaction in soil: plants, microbes and animals. Blackwell Scientific Publ, Oxford, pp 367–377
Warcup JH (1985) Rhizanthella gardneri (Orchidaceae), its Rhizoctonia endophyte and close association with Melaleu cauncinata (Myrtaceae) in Western Australia. New Phytol 99:273–280
Wratten SD, Thomas CFG (1990). Farm-scale spatial dynamics of predators and parasitoids in agricultural landscapes. In Bunce RGH, Howard DC (eds) Species Dispersal in Agricultural Habitats. London Bellhaven Press. pp. 219–237
Wratten SD, Van Emden HF (1995) Habitat manipulation for enhanced activity of natural enemies of insect pests. In Glen DM, Greaves MP, Anderson HM (eds) Ecology and integrated farming systems. In: Proceedings of the 13th Long Ashton symposium, Wiley, New York, 117–145
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khalil, M.A., Al-Assiuty, AN.I.M., van Straalen, N.M. et al. Changes in soil oribatid communities associated with conversion from conventional to organic agriculture. Exp Appl Acarol 68, 183–196 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-015-9979-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-015-9979-z