Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

On the comparative performance of recent swarm intelligence based algorithms for optimization of real-life Sterling cycle operated refrigeration/liquefaction system

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the recent past year of 2020–2021, researchers proposed many swarm intelligence based algorithms. In the present work, an effort has been made to compare the performance of these algorithms for the real-life constraint optimization problem. Swarm intelligence-based algorithms developed during 2020–2021 such as GEO, WHO, MPA, JSO, ChoA, MA, BWO, AO, COOT, and TSA are considered in the present work. These algorithms are implemented for the performance optimization of the Sterling cycle operated refrigeration/liquefaction system. Four operating variables and two output constraints of the Sterling cycle based system are considered for optimization. Comparative results are presented with statistical data to judge the performance of the algorithm and subsequently identify the statistical significance and rank of the algorithm. The effect of various constraint handling methods on the performance of algorithms is evaluated and presented. The behaviour of constraint handling methods is analyzed and presented with statistical data. Statistical analysis is also performed to observe whether the constraint handling methods produce a significant difference on the output of the considered algorithm. The effect of output constraints on the performance of algorithms is also evaluated and presented. Finally, the convergence behaviour of the competitive algorithms is obtained and demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  • Abualigah L, Yousri D, Abd-Elaziz M, Ewees AA, Al-qaness MA, Gandomi AH (2021) Aquila optimizer: a novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm. Comput Ind Eng 157:107250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi MH, Ahmadi MA, Mohammadi AH, Feidt M, Pourkiaei SM (2014) Multi-objective optimization of an irreversible stirling cryogenic refrigerator cycle. Energy Convers Manag 82:351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi MH, Ahmadi MA, Maleki A, Pourfayaz F, Bidi M, Açýkkalp E (2017a) Exergetic sustainability evaluation and multi-objective optimization of performance of an irreversible nanoscale Stirling refrigeration cycle operating with Maxwell Boltzmann gas. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 78:80–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi MH, Nabakhteh MA, Ahmadi MA, Pourfayaz F, Bidi M (2017b) Investigation and optimization of performance of nano-scale Stirling refrigerator using working fluid as Maxwell-Boltzmann gases. Physica A 483:337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsattar HA, Zaidan AA, Zaidan BB (2020) Novel meta-heuristic bald eagle search optimization algorithm. Artif Intell Rev 53:2237–2264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ameca-Alducin MY, Hasani-Shoreh M, Blaikie W, Neumann F, Mezura-Montes E (2018) A comparison of constraint handling techniques for dynamic constrained optimization problems. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC), pp 1–8

  • Askarzadeh A (2016) A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: crow search algorithm. Comput Struct 169:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batooei A, Keshavarz A (2018) A gamma type stirling refrigerator optimization: an experimental and analytical investigation. Int J Refrig 91:89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou JS, Truong DN (2020) Multi-objective optimization inspired by behaviour of jellyfish for solving structural design problems. Chaos Solitons Fractals 135:109738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhiman G, Kumar V (2017) Spotted hyena optimizer: a novel bio-inspired based metaheuristic technique for engineering applications. Adv Eng Softw 114:48–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhiman G, Kumar V (2019) Seagull optimization algorithm: theory and its applications for large-scale industrial engineering problems. Knowl-Based Syst 165:169–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorigo M, Maniezzo V, Colorni A (1991) Positive feedback as a search strategy, Technical Report 91–016, Politecnico di Milano, Italy

  • Eusuff MM, Lansey KE (2003) Optimization of water distribution network design using the shuffled frog leaping algorithm. J Water Resour Plan Manag 129:210–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faramarzi A, Heidarinejad M, Mirjalili S, Gandomi AH (2020) Marine Predators Algorithm: A Nature-inspired Metaheuristic. Expert Syst Appl 152:113377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayyolalam V, Kazem AA (2020) Black widow optimization algorithm: a novel meta-heuristic approach for solving engineering optimization problems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 87:103249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayyolalam V, Pourhaji-Kazem AA (2017) QoS-aware optimization of cloud service composition using symbiotic organisms search algorithm. J Intell Proc Electr Technol 8:29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidari AA, Mirjalili S, Faris H, Aljarah I, Mafarja M, Chen H (2019) Harris hawks optimization: algorithm and applications. Futur Gener Comput Syst 97:849–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahani E, Chizari M (2018) Tackling global optimization problems with a novel algorithm–Mouth Brooding Fish algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 62:987–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain M, Singh V, Rani A (2019) A novel nature-inspired algorithm for optimization: squirrel search algorithm. Swarm Evol Comput 44:148–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joaquín D, Salvador G, Daniel M, Francisco H (2011) A practical tutorial on the use of non parametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms. Swarm Evol Comput 1:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaboga D (2005) An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization, Technical report–TR06, Erciyes University, Engineering Faculty, Computer Engineering Department

  • Kaur S, Awasthi LK, Sangal AL, Dhiman G (2020) Tunicate Swarm algorithm: a new bio-inspired based metaheuristic paradigm for global optimization. Eng Appl Artif Intell 90:103541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) Particle swarm optimization, In: Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE international conference on neural networks, Perth, Australia, pp 1942–1948

  • Khishe M, Mosavi MR (2020) Chimp optimization algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 149:113338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallipeddi R, Suganthan PN (2010) Ensemble of constraint handling techniques. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 14:561–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirjalili S (2015a) The ant lion optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 83:80–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirjalili S (2015b) Moth-flame optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowl-Based Syst 89:228–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirjalili S (2016) Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Comput Appl 27:1053–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2016) The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 95:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Grey wolf optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 69:46–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirjalili S, Gandomi AH, Mirjalili SZ, Saremi S, Faris H, Mirjalili SM (2017) Salp swarm algorithm: a bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Adv Eng Softw 114:163–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirjalili SZ, Mirjalili S, Saremi S, Faris H, Aljarah I (2018) Grasshopper optimization algorithm for multi-objective optimization problems. Appl Intell 48:805–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed AA, Hassan SA, Hemeida AM, Alkhalaf S, Mahmoud MM, Eldin AM (2020) Parasitism-Predation algorithm (PPA): a novel approach for feature selection. Ain Shams Eng J 11:293–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi-Balani A, Nayeri MD, Azar A, Taghizadeh-Yazdi M (2021) Golden eagle optimizer: a nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm. Comput Ind Eng 152:107050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naruei I, Keynia F (2021a) Wild horse optimizer: a new meta-heuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01438-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naruei I, Keynia F (2021b) A new optimization method based on coot bird natural life model. Expert Syst Appl 183:115352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TT, Yao X (2012) Continuous dynamic constrained optimization: the challenges. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 16:769–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passino K (2002) Biomimicry of bacterial foraging for distributed optimization and control. IEEE Control Syst Mag 22:52–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel VK, Savsani VJ, Tawhid MA (2019) Thermal system optimization: a population-based metaheuristic approach. Springer, Switzerland

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pham D, Ghanbarzadeh A, Koc E, Rahim S, Zaidi M (2005) The bees algorithm: technical note, Technical report, Manufacturing engineering centre. Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

  • Shadravan S, Naji HR, Bardsiri VK (2019) The Sailfish Optimizer: a novel nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for solving constrained engineering optimization problems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 80:20–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue J, Shen B (2020) A novel swarm intelligence optimization approach: sparrow search algorithm. Syst Sci Control Eng 8:22–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang XS (2008) Firefly Algorithm, nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms. Luniver Press, Beckington, pp 128–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang XS (2010) A new metaheuristic bat-inspired algorithm. In: González JR, Sancho-Royo A, Pelta DA, Cruz C (eds) Nature inspired cooperative strategies for optimization. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 65–74

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yang XS, Deb S (2010) Engineering optimization by cuckoo search. Int J Math Modell Numer Optim 1:330–343

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zervoudakis K, Tsafarakis S (2020) A mayfly optimization algorithm. Comput Ind Eng 145:106559

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivek K. Patel.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raja, B.D., Patel, V.K., Savsani, V.J. et al. On the comparative performance of recent swarm intelligence based algorithms for optimization of real-life Sterling cycle operated refrigeration/liquefaction system. Artif Intell Rev 56, 1297–1317 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10201-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10201-9

Keywords

Navigation