Abstract
A large proportion of people living with HIV (PLHIV) in sub-Saharan Africa reside in rural areas. Knowledge of enablers and barriers of adherence to antiretroviral treatment (ART) in these populations is limited. We conducted a cohort study of 501 adult PLHIV on ART at a rural South African treatment facility as a sub-study of a clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03357588). Socio-economic, psychosocial and behavioral characteristics were assessed as covariates of self-reported adherence difficulties, suboptimal pill count adherence and virological failure during 96 weeks of follow-up. Male gender was an independent risk factor for all outcomes. Food insecurity was associated with virological failure in males. Depressive symptoms were independently associated with virological failure in both males and females. Household income and task-oriented coping score were protective against suboptimal pill-count adherence. These results underscore the impact of low household income, food insecurity and depression on outcomes of ART in rural settings and confirm other previously described risk factors. Recognition of these factors and targeted adherence support strategies may improve patient health and treatment outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
South Africa (SA) has an estimated HIV prevalence of 13.7%, with approximately 8.2 million people living with HIV (PLHIV) in 2021 [1]. Over one-third of the South African population resides in rural settings [2]. Rural populations are characterized by disadvantaged socio-economic status, limited access to healthcare services, and poor infrastructure and healthcare resources, when compared to their urban counterparts [3]. These factors adversely affect access and adherence to HIV treatment, potentially resulting in worse health outcomes for PLHIV [3, 4].
Studies report episodes of ART non-adherence in around one-third of PLHIV residing in rural sub-Saharan Africa [4-7]. Non-adherence to ART in sub-Saharan Africa is associated with patient-related risk factors and social determinants, including changes in daily activities, forgetting to take ART, lack of health literacy, unwillingness to take ART, unemployment, poverty, HIV-status disclosure concern, HIV-related stigma, lack of clinician trust, poor coping mechanisms and mental health problems [8-11] The effect of these risk factors may be more profound in rural populations, as studies on barriers to care found that PLHIV in rural areas report more and more severe barriers to care than those living in urban areas [12, 13]. This may be of particular relevance to male PLHIV in sub-Saharan African settings, who are at increased risk of various adverse outcomes of treatment, in part stemming from lack of access to care [14,15,16].
Suboptimal ART adherence can result in virological failure, which has adverse consequences for both individual and public health. Firstly, virological failure of ART is associated with an increased risk of disease progression and reduced survival [17, 18]. Secondly, virological failure is often accompanied by the development of HIV drug resistance [19, 20]. Drug resistance requires switching to more complex and expensive ART regimens, which have a higher pill burden, and often have less tolerable side effects [21, 22]. Finally, virological failure greatly increases the risk of onward transmission of HIV [23].
As roll-out of ART continues to expand in South Africa, efforts are being made to optimize adherence to treatment and treatment efficacy. The recent adoption of dolutegravir (DTG) for all adult PLHIV is expected to improve adherence and efficacy [24]. Effective ART adherence support requires an understanding of the multi-level factors affecting overall adherence, which include socio-demographic, socio-economic, psycho-social and environmental conditions [25]. Knowledge of these factors may be used to identify individuals at risk of non-adherence and to identify factors that can promote ART adherence and improve patient care and programmatic outcomes. The aim of this study is to assess risk factors for adverse outcomes of ART, namely non-adherence and virological failure in rural South African PLHIV. This study also aims to describe the differential risk profiles associated with each of these outcomes.
Methods
Design and Procedures
We conducted a prospective cohort study as a sub-study of the Intensified Treatment Monitoring Strategy to Prevent Accumulation of Drug Resistance (ITREMA; Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03357588). ITREMA was an open-label randomized clinical trial evaluating different treatment monitoring strategies for first-line ART, which ran from June 2015 to January 2019 [26]. In this trial, patients initiating ART were to be randomized after 6 months of ART and patients already on ART were randomized at 6 months after the last viral load measurement [26]. The trial protocol can be found in the Supplementary materials (Supplementary material 5).
Parent Study Control Arm
Patients randomly assigned to this arm were monitored in full concordance with current South African NDoH guidelines in use at the study site. Viral load measurements were performed at month 12 and 24 after start of ART (for newly initiated patients) or at month 12 and 24 after the last viral load measurement (patients already on ART). If a viral load > 1000 copies/ml is detected, the patient was called back for counseling for therapy adherence and repeat viral load measurement, 2 months after the initial viral load measurement. If the repeat viral load measurement was > 1000 copies/ml after adherence counseling, this was taken to be indicative of therapy failure due to development of drug resistance and a switch to second line therapy was made, together with intensified adherence counseling, without verifying the cause of virological failure by performing drug level testing or drug resistance testing. If viral load dropped to < 1000 copies/ml after adherence counseling, the first line treatment was maintained.
Parent Study Intervention Arm
Patients randomly assigned to this arm were monitored using the investigational intensified monitoring strategy. This strategy consisted of 3-monthly viral load monitoring at month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 (after start of ART in initiating patients or after the last viral load measurement in patients on ART). If a viral load measurement > 1000 copies/ml was detected, the patient was called back for a follow-up study visit at the next monthly medication collection visit (4 weeks after detection of elevated viral load). Upon arrival drug level testing was performed, repeated the viral load measurement, and a dried blood spot prepared and stored at room temperature. Procedures following this depended on the result of drug level testing:
If drug levels were detected by drug level testing, the result of the viral load measurement was awaited. If the repeat viral load was > 1000 copies/ml, the dried blood spot was shipped directly by courier to the World Health Organization (WHO) reference laboratory for drug resistance testing. The reference laboratory provided feedback by means of a digital resistance report to the coordinating research physician. The patient would be called back for a second follow-up study visit at the next monthly medication visit (8 weeks after detection of elevated viral load), either for prescription of second-line therapy or continuation of first-line therapy, guided by the result of resistance testing.
If drug level monitoring at the first follow-up visit indicated that drug levels were not detected, intensified counseling was performed at the same visit and first-line therapy was maintained, regardless of the result of the repeat viral load measurement. The patient would not be called back and the next viral load would be performed at the next scheduled 3-monthly time point. However, if the viral load result at this visit was again > 1000 copies/ml, drug resistance testing would be performed regardless of the outcome of drug level testing.
The study was conducted at the Ndlovu medical centre in the rural area of Elandsdoorn where adherence among people living with HIV has not been broadly investigated, which serves the larger Moutse area, situated in the Sekhukhune District Municipality in Limpopo province. It is estimated that the area has about 140–150,000 inhabitants of whom only 4% have tertiary education [27, 28]. According to official statistics, almost half of adults are unemployed, and more than two-thirds of families live below the upper-bound poverty line (UBPL) income of 1183 ZAR ($70.90 per month) [1, 28, 29]. At the time of study, The HIV prevalence in the district was 8.1% of the total population [28], and approximately 3600 PLHIV were receiving HIV treatment and care at Ndlovu Medical Centre. The ITREMA study enrolled adult PLHIV and assessed an intensified treatment monitoring strategy in a randomized comparison with a control group receiving standard-of-care HIV treatment in accordance with the South Africa National Department of Health guidelines [5]. Trial participants were followed up for 96 weeks.
Sample, Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
All records of participants who consented to enrolment in the ITREMA trial were included in our sub-study. The trial included adult participants (18 years and older) who were HIV positive and were either ART-naïve and ready to start treatment or had been on treatment for more than 1 year. As the trial intervention was deemed not to interfere with the predictor-outcome relationships assessed in the current study, participants were included regardless of randomization status.
Data Collection and Measures
Data were collected by a trained research assistant, and included sociodemographic and psychosocial characteristics, self-reported adherence difficulties, pill count and viral load information.
Sociodemographic Characteristics
Collected information included age, gender, education level, employment status, income, income compositions and household income, number of household members and household composition, and partnership status. Measures were adapted from the South African National Income Dynamics Study and the National Health Nutrition Survey [30, 31]. Income data was entered in South African Rand (ZAR) and was converted to United States Dollar (USD) amounts using the approximate exchange rate at the time of start of study (12.30 ZAR to USD exchange rate, June 2015). Questions regarding food insecurity related to the availability of food in the participant’s household. These included (1) Did your household run out of money to buy food during the past 12 months? (yes/no/do not know), (2) Has it happened in the past 30 days? (yes/no/do not know), (3) Has it happened 5 or more days in the past 30 days? (yes/no/do not know), (4) In the past 12 months, were there times when members of your household went hungry because there was not enough food in the house to eat? (yes/no/do not know), (5) Which were the months (in the last 12 months) in which you experienced a lack of food or money such that one or more members of your household had to go hungry? (January → December, do not know). Individuals were labeled to be food insecure if they answer “Yes” to all affirmative household food access scale of occurrence questions.
Psychosocial Variables
Questionnaire item scores were each evaluated for consistency and distribution (Supplementary material 1). Some composite scores were dichotomized based on skewness of the distribution of the response. Sensitivity analyses of the univariate analyses and multivariable models for each outcome were performed in which all item scores were entered as continuous variables.
Adherence efficacy describes the attitude towards and expectations of the effect of ART that participants had prior to starting treatment. Adherence efficacy was measured with three items from the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) questionnaire [32]: “If you do not take this medication exactly as instructed, the HIV in your body will become resistant to HIV medication”, “The medication will have a positive effect on your health”, and “You will be able to take all or most of the medication as directed?”. Responses were measured on a four-point scale, from “not at all” (1) to “extremely sure” (4). Item scores were summed; a higher score indicated higher adherence efficacy (maximum score 12). The 3-item scale had good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.87). Scores were dichotomised and values above 8 were classified as high adherence efficacy.
Support from household and non-household members were each assessed with five items from the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study, and included questions on support in making decisions about work/education, social, leisure time activities, and other personal matters [33], for instance: “To what extent do persons in your household support you?” or “To what extent do family members who do not live in your household support you?” Responses were given on a four-point scale, from ‘no support (1)’ to ‘a lot of support (4)’. The two subscales each had good internal consistency (household members: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92; non-household members: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96). Item scores were averaged, and a higher score indicated more support from household or non-household members (maximum score 20). Scores were dichotomised and values above 14 were classified as high household support.
Health literacy was assessed using the Brief Estimate of Health Knowledge and Action (BEHKA) HIV version [34]. This instrument was designed to assess HIV-related health knowledge and the ability to act in accordance with this knowledge, encompassing two subscales: theoretical knowledge (2 items) and operational knowledge (5 items). The following theoretical knowledge items are included: “Is the goal of ARV’s to make the CD4-count go UP or DOWN?”, and “Is the goal of ARV’s to make the viral load go UP or DOWN?”. The theoretical knowledge items were scored as correct or incorrect and correct responses were summed. Operational knowledge questions included: “I don’t take my ARV’s when they make me feel bad”, “I don’t take my ARV’s when I am too tired”, “I don’t take my ARV’s when I am feeling down or low”, “I don’t take my ARV’s because it tastes bad”, and “I don’t take my ARV’s when I feel good”. Responses to the operational knowledge items were given on a three-point scale ranging from “agree” (1) to “disagree” (3). The operational knowledge sub-scale had adequate internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.72). Three points were allocated per question where the answer was “disagree”, 1 where the answer was “agree” and 2 points where the answer was “unsure”. Final scores on the operational knowledge items were summed as follows: 0–3 = low, 4–5 = marginal and 6–8 = adequate and a higher score indicated higher health literacy. The calculated composite score as per questionnaire instructions [34, 35] (maximum score 8) was dichotomised and values above 6 were classified as high health literacy.
Clinician trust was assessed with the Revised Helping Alliance Questionnaires [36]. This 11-item instrument is designed to assess the relationship between a patient and their clinician and whether the patient trusts the clinician in terms of shared decision-making, discussing personal matters regarding HIV and ART, communication, and respect. In the context of our study, clinician referred to a clinician providing care to a participant at Ndlovu Medical Centre. The following are examples of items: ‘a good relationship has formed with my clinician’ or ‘I feel the clinician understands me.’ Responses were given on a six-point scale ranging from ‘strongly disagree (1)’ to ‘strongly agree (6)’; The scale had a good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.82). Item scores were summed (maximum score 66), and a higher score represented more trust in the clinician. Summary scores were dichotomised and values above 48 were classified as high clinician trust.
The Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS-21) was included to measure use of task-, emotion-, and avoidance-oriented coping strategies during a stressful situation, which were each measured with seven items [25, 26]. Task-oriented coping refers to direct action to solve a particular problem (e.g., “I focus on the problem and see how I can solve it”), emotion-oriented coping refers to efforts to modify emotional states caused by stress (e.g., “I blame myself for being too emotional in the situation”), and avoidance-oriented coping refers to efforts to minimize distress by avoiding the problem or finding distracting activities (e.g., “I take some time off and get away from the problem”) [37]. Responses to items were given on a 5-point scale ranging from “never” (1) to “always (5)”. The full scale had good overall internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.81), and the internal consistency of the subscales was adequate to good (task-oriented coping: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88; emotion-oriented coping: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.74; avoidance-oriented coping: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.74). Item scores were summed, and a higher score indicated a more frequent use of the specific coping strategy (maximum score per scale 56). Each subscale was entered as a separate continuous covariable to the statistical analysis.
HIV-related stigma was assessed using the 13-item scale developed by Kalichman et al. [38], which focuses on internalized stigma and stigmatizing beliefs. Items include: “people who have AIDS are dirty”, “most people become HIV positive by being weak or foolish”, “would you mind if people knew if your family member has HIV/AIDS”? Responses were given on a 4-point scale ranging from “strongly disagree” (1) to “strongly agree” (4), with higher scores indicating more experienced stigma. The scale had good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.87). A mean composite score was calculated and dichotomized along the median.
The 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) was used to assesses experienced depression [39]. Participants answered the following question for several depression-related symptoms: “Over the last 2 weeks, how often have you been bothered by any of the following problems?” Examples of symptoms include: “Little interest or pleasure in doing things”, “Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless”, “Trouble falling or staying asleep, or sleeping too much”, “Thoughts that you would be better off dead or of hurting yourself in some way”. Responses were given on a 4-point scale ranging from “not at all” (1), “several days” (2), “more than half the days” (3) to “nearly every day” (4). The results of one participant who refused to answer this questionnaire in full were excluded from this part of the analysis. The scale had adequate internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.78). Item scores were summed and dichotomized according to questionnaire instructions [35, 39, 40], with low scores (1–9) indicating minor to mild symptoms of depression and scores > 9 indicating moderate or severe depressive symptoms (maximum score 27).
ART Adherence and Virological Failure
Self-reported adherence difficulty was measured at 3-monthly intervals between week 12 and 96 of follow-up using three items from the ACTG questionnaire [32] adopted in the CASE self-reported adherence index [41]: “How often do you have difficulty in taking your medication on time”?, with responses given on 4-point scale (1 = all the time, 4 = never, “On average how many days per week would you say that you missed at least one dose of your medication?”, with responses given on a 6-point scale (1 = every day, 6 = never), and “When was the last time you missed taking any of your medications?”, with responses also given on a 6-point scale (1 = past week, 6 = never). Responding ‘never’ to all three questions at all timepoints was taken to indicate no self-reported adherence difficulties. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using the single item “On average how many days per week would you say that you missed at least one dose of your medication?” to assess whether adoption of a more immediate measure of short-term non-adherence would yield different results.
Suboptimal adherence as measured using pill count was measured at 3-monthly intervals between week 12 and 96 of follow-up. Patients were instructed to return with leftover ART tablets. Tablets were counted and the number of doses taken during the last month was calculated as a percentage of the number of doses prescribed by a lay adherence, with 100% indicating complete adherence. Non-adherence was defined as a pill count < 95% in accordance with the threshold used by the WHO [42].
The HIV-RNA load was measured at 6 months (24 weeks), 1 year, and 2 years after initiation of ART in newly initiated participants, and annually in participants already on ART. Virological failure was defined as viremia ≥ 1000 copies/ml, as defined by the WHO [43, 44].
For each outcome, if the outcome definition occurred on at least one timepoint, the patient was marked as having met the outcome definition. Treatment arm allocation in the parent trial was not included as a covariate in the current analysis, as this variable was shown not to be significantly associated with virological failure, self-reported adherence difficulties or suboptimal adherence as measured using pill count [45].
Data Analysis
Data were analyzed using STATA version 15.1. Frequencies were calculated to describe categorical variables while median and interquartile range were calculated for continuous variables. For univariable analysis of associations between outcomes (self-reported adherence difficulties, suboptimal adherence indicated by pill count and virological failure) and covariables, the Pearson Chi-square or Fischer’s Exact test were used in case of dichotomous and categorical variables, and the Student’s t-test in case of continuous covariables. Variables that were associated with the outcome with a significance level of < 0.1 were subsequently included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess independent associations; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Stratified analyses of female and male participants were performed. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were reported.
Results
Patient Characteristics
Participants’ socio-demographic characteristics are presented in Table 1. Of the 501 participants included, 29.9% were male (150/501). Participants median age was 42 years (IQR 36–49 years); over half the participants were aged 35–49 years (51.3%, 257/501). Over half of participants (58.7%, 294/501) were in a relationship, which included being married, cohabiting, or having a partner but not living together. The majority (81.4%, 408/501) had a secondary (grade 8–12) or tertiary level of education, and 18.6% (93/501) had a primary education level (grade 0–7). More than half of participants (51.1%, 256/501) were unemployed. Over two-thirds of the participant households (69.1%, 346/501) earned less than the current South African minimum wage of 3500.00 ZAR (285 USD) per month, while 6.2% (31/501) households earned above 10,000 ZAR (813 USD) per month. In terms of social grants, about half of the study participants did not receive any grant (51.3%, 257/501), while 22.6% (113/501) received a child support grant, 18.0% (90/501) received an old age grant, and 3.2% (16/501) received a disability grant. The median number of people in participants’ households was 5 (IQR = 3–7). Less than 10% of the study participants reported food insecurity in the last 30 days (8.2%, 41/501). The majority of the study participants had adequate self-efficacy (94.2%, 472/502), high health literacy (98.8%, 487/501), high clinician trust (99.6%, 497/501), good household (86.8%, 434/501) and non-household support (60.9%, 305/501) (Table 1).
Assessments during follow-up of self-reported adherence difficulties and adherence indicated by pill count were available for 458 participants. Viral load data during follow-up were available for 436 participants. Overall, 53.1% (243/458) of participants self-reported adherence difficulties, 35.4% (162/458) had a pill count < 95%, and 15.5% (n = 68/436) experienced virological failure (≥ 1000 copies/ml).
Overlap Between Study Outcomes
Of all study participants, 7.2% (36/501) met all three study outcomes, 28.3% (142/501) had both self-reported non-adherence and suboptimal pill count, 10.0% (50/501) had both self-reported non-adherence and virological failure, and 7.2% (36/501) reported suboptimal pill count and virological failure.
Test of Association Analysis
Findings of analyses of covariates of self-reported adherence difficulties, pill count and virological failure are shown in Table 1. Self-reported adherence difficulties were more likely in male compared to female participants (coefficient = 0.56, p = 0.008, chi = 7.052). Suboptimal adherence as indicated by a pill count < 95% was also more likely in male participants (coefficient = 0.48, p = 0.023, chi = 5.187). Suboptimal pill count adherence was inversely associated with household income (coefficient = − 0.063, p = 0.021, chi = 2.378) and use of task-oriented coping (coefficient = − 0.032, p = 0.025, chi = 2.246) and these factors where thus protective against suboptimal pill count adherence. Virological failure was again more likely in male participants (coefficient = 0.68, p = 0.014, chi = 6.338). In addition, there was a strong association between the presence of moderate or severe depressive symptoms and virological failure. These were present in 13.2% [9/68] of participants with virological failure versus 4.6% [17/368] of participants without virological failure (coefficient = 1.14, p = 0.009, chi = 7.556). Univariate findings between the predictor variables and the outcomes demonstrated similar associations (Supplementary material 2) (Tables 2, 3).
Multivariable Analysis
Results of multivariable logistic regression analyses of correlates of self-reported adherence difficulties, suboptimal adherence indicated by pill count and virological failure are shown in Table 4. For self-reported adherence difficulties, the only independent risk factor was male gender (aOR 1.78 [95%CI 1.17–2.71]; p = 0.007, z = 2.67). Male gender also was an independent risk factor for poor adherence as indicated by pill count < 95% (aOR 1.57 [95%CI 1.02–2.41]; p = 0.040, z = 2.06), while higher household income (aOR 0.94 [95%CI 0.89–0.99]; p = 0.030, z = − 2.26) and higher task-oriented coping (aOR 0.97 [95%CI 0.94–1.00]; p = 0.031, z = − 2.16) were found to be protective factors against suboptimal adherence indicated by pill count < 95%. Independent risk factors for virological failure were male gender (aOR 1.95 [95%CI 1.13–3.36]; p = 0.017, z = 2.39) and moderate or severe depressive symptoms (aOR 2.92 [95%CI 1.17–7.79]; p = 0.021, z = 2.30). Stratified analyses by sex showed that virological failure was more likely in males who reported food insecurity in the last 30 days (aOR 5.74 [95%CI 1.49–22.05]; p = 0.011, z = 2.54) and in females reporting depression (aOR 3.32 [95%CI 1.02–10.82]; p = 0.046, z = 1.99) (Tables 5, 6).
Sensitivity Analyses
When all psychosocial characteristics were entered as continuous measures to univariate and multivariable analysis, results for the outcomes of self-reported adherence difficulties and virological failure remained essentially unchanged (Supplementary materials 2, 3). For suboptimal adherence as indicated by pill count < 95%, the associations in univariate and multivariable analysis with gender and household income remained consistent. However, the association with task-oriented coping remained present in univariate analysis but not in multivariable analysis. Instead, the multivariable analysis for this outcome revealed associations with health literacy and household family support (Supplementary materials 2, 3).
Sensitivity analysis using a self-reported adherence variable that considers only short-term adherence demonstrated a prevalence of self-reported short-term non-adherence of 51.3% (235/458) versus a prevalence of 53.1% (243/458) for the definition of self-reported adherence difficulties that was used in the main analysis. Univariate associations and multivariable model results with this outcome were consistent with the results of the main analysis (Supplementary materials 4).
Discussion
Our study has assessed rates and sociodemographic and psychosocial factors associated with non-adherence as measured through self-report and pill count and virological failure among PLHIV in a South African rural population. We identified several demographic, socio-economic, and behavioural risk factors for non-adherence and virological failure and showed that there is limited overlap of markers of adherence with virological failure. We found that male gender was an independent risk factor for all outcomes. Depressive symptoms were independently associated with virological failure while household income and task-oriented coping score were protective against suboptimal pill-count adherence.
In multivariable analyses we found that self-reported adherence difficulties, suboptimal pill count adherence and virological failure were more likely in men than women. The finding of increased problems with adherence to ART in men is consistent with other studies conducted in rural settings and may reflect poorer healthcare behaviour in men [15, 46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. Several studies performed in different cultural contexts have identified underlying reasons for the generally poorer healthcare behavior of men [4, 54,55,56]. For men in rural settings in particular these include lack of time, poor healthcare access due to social constructions of masculinity, underlying cultural reasons, distance needed to travel to access care, and the lack of male care providers [4, 15, 54, 55, 57, 58]. Men from rural settings report more severe barriers to care than their urban counterparts [13, 59], highlighting the need to acknowledge how masculinity serve as a barrier for rural men’s access to ART services and prioritize rural men for interventions promoting ART adherence [55].
Suboptimal adherence as indicated by pill count was associated with low household income, as also found by other studies [41, 60]. These findings confirm that despite the scale up of free ART in South Africa, financial constraints remain a barrier to ART adherence. Concerns around low household income in rural settings are centered on cost of seeking treatment, the distance needed to travel to access care, reliance on traditional medicine and the cost of food [41]. At first sight, our finding that in stratified analysis the risk of virological failure was higher among male participants with food insecurity seems to be a result of this same dynamic. However, this finding is at odds with other studies reporting that women, not men, are less favored in terms of household food distribution and that mechanisms for how food insecurity impacted adherence were generally similar among women and men [61, 62]. Nonetheless, our results suggest that there is a link between gender, food insecurity and ART adherence, heightening the importance of addressing food insecurity as part of comprehensive care among PLHIV. Further research should also examine how the negative impact of food unavailability on adherence in food-stressed households can be mitigated. Programmatic models that have been successful in rural settings, aiming to improve food security and nutrition in an HIV context include: (1) Nutrition supplementation interventions targeted to undernourished PLHIV, often using specialized foods, with nutrition assessment, counselling and support as a central component targeted to all PLHIV regardless of nutrition status. (2) Safety nets (food, cash transfer or vouchers), targeted to HIV-affected households and individuals (such as Orphans and Vulnerable Children) to improve household food security, mitigate the impact of HIV, and (3) Livelihood interventions targeted to PLHIV households or communities heavily affected by the AIDS epidemic [63].
In this cohort, better adherence as indicated by pill count was associated with increased use of task-oriented coping. This was more evident in female participants. This suggests that counselling strategies addressing specific coping styles could have a positive effect on ART treatment outcomes. Moreover, it is likely that there also are indirect associations between coping strategies, sex, and adherence to treatment through markers of mental health. More research is needed to assess these relationships and guide future interventions.
Furthermore, we found that the risk of virological failure was higher among participants with moderate or severe depressive symptoms. In stratified analysis, we found that while the prevalence of depressive symptoms was similar between men and women, the association was significant among female participants only. These findings are comparable to those of several studies assessing risk factors for non-adherence in PLHIV, which also found evidence that depression was associated with poor outcomes for HIV-infected patients on ART, especially in women [64, 65]. Our results suggest that, despite substantial progress made in quality and access to HIV related health care [66] as seen with recent transition to a DTG-based regimen [67], depression and other mental health problems remain underdiagnosed and often untreated among rural PLHIV [13, 68]. There hence remains a critical need to screen for and treat depressive symptoms in PLHIV. The association between depression, sex and markers of suboptimal adherence indicate that screening for mental health problems should be considered as an integral part of adherence counselling, and that treatment of these problems could potentially improve adherence to ART.
We encountered high levels of both self-reported adherence difficulties as well as suboptimal adherence as measured through pill count in this setting. In contrast, rates of virological failure in this cohort were more limited. While self-reported adherence difficulties and suboptimal pill count results were significantly correlated with each other and with virological failure, overlap between these outcomes was limited. Sensitivity analysis showed similar findings for self-reported adherence difficulties. Various studies have reported significant correlations between objective and self-report measures of ART adherence [69-71], even though some studies conducted in developed and developing settings suggest that viral load is more likely to be accurate in terms of reflecting true adherence rates than self-reported adherence [8, 72]. Previous research conducted in sub-Saharan African countries has also found that self-reported adherence tended to over or under-estimate adherence and is not necessarily associated with the virological suppression status of patients [73-76]. Factors that may affect the reliability of self-reported adherence and pill counts are numerous, and include variation in measurement methods and thresholds, social desirability bias, healthcare worker trust, and recall error.
Limitations and Strengths
This study included participants receiving clinical care in a medical centre in rural Limpopo, South Africa. Therefore, findings from this study may not be generalizable to other rural settings in South Africa, or to other country settings. While the study assessed a broad range of psychosocial factors, the many individual, social and structural factors that may be of influence cannot feasibly be assessed in a single study. Therefore, the scope of covariates, while broad, by definition, and inevitably is limited. Potential covariates of ART adherence were assessed through self-report, which may have been affected by memory bias and social desirability bias. This study also highlights the practical limitations of conducting pill counts. In many cases patients forgot to take their left-over medication to their clinical visit. Previous studies used unannounced pill count to avoid this practical limitation, but this may not be feasible in practice.
Conclusion
This study in a rural community of people with HIV found that PLHIV who were male, had low household income or experienced moderate or severe depressive symptoms were at increased risk of suboptimal adherence and/or virological failure, and may benefit from additional ART adherence support. Sex-specific risk factors that were identified included depressive symptoms in women and food insecurity in men. Task-oriented coping was protective against suboptimal adherence as indicated by pill count. While the rate of self-reported adherence difficulties was high, there was limited overlap between risk factors for non-adherence and virological failure. The high levels of self-reported adherence difficulties would point to a possible self-reporting bias resulting in an over-estimation of bias adherence problems. Our identification of socio-demographic and psychosocial risk factors can guide the targeting of adherence support interventions to rural populations, as well as highlight the factors underlying adherence problems that should be addressed in such interventions. Our findings contribute to the available knowledge on risk factors for adverse outcomes of ART in rural populations and may contribute to the ongoing development of ‘rural proof’ healthcare policies currently being introduced in South Africa, such as National Health Insurance and the new 2030 Human Resources for Health Strategy.
Data Availability
The datasets used or analysed for the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Statistics South Africa (Stats SA). Mid-year population estimates [Internet]. Pretoria; 2021. Available from: http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0302/P03022021.pdf.
Wools-Kaloustian K, Kimaiyo S, Diero L, Siika A, Sidle J, Yiannoutsos CT, et al. Viability and effectiveness of large-scale HIV treatment initiatives in sub-Saharan Africa: experience from western Kenya. AIDS. 2006;20(1):41–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aids.0000196177.65551.ea.
Rural Health Information Hub. Healthcare access in rural communities introduction [Internet]. Rural Health Topics. 2015. Available from: https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/topics/healthcare-access#health-insurance.
Bukenya D, Mayanja BN, Nakamanya S, Muhumuza R, Seeley J. What causes non-adherence among some individuals on long term antiretroviral therapy? Experiences of individuals with poor viral suppression in Uganda. AIDS Res Ther. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-018-0214-y.
Azia IN, Mukumbang FC, Van Wyk B. Barriers to adherence to antiretroviral treatment in a regional hospital in Vredenburg, Western Cape, South Africa. S Afr J HIV Med. 2016. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v17i1.476.
Peltzer K, Friend-Du Preez N, Ramlagan S, Anderson J. Antiretroviral treatment adherence among HIV patients in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. BMC Public Health. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-111.
Evans D, Berhanu R, Moyo F, Nguweneza A, Long L, Fox MP. Can short-term use of electronic patient adherence monitoring devices improve adherence in patients failing second-line antiretroviral therapy? Evidence from a Pilot Study in Johannesburg, South Africa. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(11):2717–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1417-7.
Shubber Z, Mills EJ, Nachega JB, Vreeman R, Freitas M, Bock P, et al. Patient-reported barriers to adherence to antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2016;13(11):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002183.
Fox MP, Rosen S. Retention of adult patients on antiretroviral therapy in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis 2008–2013. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;69(1):98–108. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000553.
Wogrin C, Willis N, Mutsinze A, Chinoda S, Verhey R, Chibanda D, et al. It helps to talk: a guiding framework (TRUST) for peer support in delivering mental health care for adolescents living with HIV. PLoS ONE. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248018.
Amoateng AY, Kalule-Sabiti I, Oladipo SE. Psycho-social experiences and coping among caregivers of people living with HIV/AIDS in the North-West province of South Africa. S Afr J Psychol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246314556566.
Reif S, Golin CE, Smith SR. Barriers to accessing HIV/AIDS care in North Carolina: rural and urban differences. AIDS Care. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120412331319750.
Heckman TG, Somlai AM, Peters J, Walker J, Otto-Salaj L, Galdabini CA, et al. Barriers to care among persons living with HIV/AIDS in urban and rural areas. AIDS Care. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1080/713612410.
Pellowski JA. Barriers to care for rural people living with HIV: a review of domestic research and health care models. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jana.2012.08.007.
Maman D, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Subtil F, Pinoges L, McGuire M, Ecochard R, et al. Gender differences in immune reconstitution: a multicentric cohort analysis in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS ONE. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031078.
Kipp W, Alibhai A, Saunders LD, Senthilselvan A, Kaler A, Konde-Lule J, et al. Gender differences in antiretroviral treatment outcomes of HIV patients in rural Uganda. AIDS Care. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120903193625.
Lima VD, Bangsberg DR, Harrigan PR, Deeks SG, Yip B, Hogg RS, et al. Risk of viral failure declines with duration of suppression on highly active antiretroviral therapy irrespective of adherence level. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;55(4):460–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181f2ac87.
Lailulo Y, Kitenge M, Jaffer S, Aluko O, Nyasulu PS. Factors associated with antiretroviral treatment failure among people living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy in resource-poor settings: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Syst Rev. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01524-1.
Boender TS, Hoenderboom BM, Sigaloff KCE, Hamers RL, Wellington M, Shamu T, et al. Pretreatment HIV drug resistance increases regimen switches in sub-Saharan Africa. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(11):1749–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ656.
Boender TS, Kityo CM, Boerma RS, Hamers RL, Ondoa P, Wellington M, et al. Accumulation of HIV-1 drug resistance after continued virological failure on first-line ART in adults and children in sub-Saharan Africa. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71(10):2918–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkw218.
Meintjes G, Moorhouse MA, Carmona S, Davies N, Dlamini S, Van Vuuren C, et al. Adult antiretroviral therapy guidelines 2017. S Afr J HIV Med. 2017. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhivmed.v18i1.776.
Phillips AN, Cambiano V, Nakagawa F, Revill P, Jordan MR, Hallett TB, et al. Cost-effectiveness of public-health policy options in the presence of pretreatment NNRTI drug resistance in sub-Saharan Africa: a modelling study. Lancet HIV. 2018;5(3):e146–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30190-X.
Hermans LE, Carmona S, Nijhuis M, Tempelman HA, Richman DD, Moorhouse M, et al. Virological suppression and clinical management in response to viremia in South African HIV treatment program: a multicenter cohort study. PLoS Med. 2020;17(2):e1003037. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003037.
World Health Organization (WHO). Update of recommendations on first- and second-line antiretroviral regimens. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-CDS-HIV-19.15.
Williams SL, Haskard-Zolnierek K, DiMatteo MR. Improving adherence to health regimens. In: Norcross JC, VandenBos GR, Freedheim DK, Pole N, editors. APA handbook of clinical psychology: psychopathology and health, vol. 4. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2016. p. 551–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/14862-026.
Wensing AMJ. The intensified treatment monitoring strategy to prevent accumulation of drug resistance (ITREMA) trial. 2017. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03357588.
Ndlovu Care Group. Ndlovu Care Group (NCG) has created a trust relationship with the communities [Internet]. [cited 2022 Mar 9]. Available from: http://ndlovuresearch.org/. http://ndlovuresearch.org/.
Sekhukhune District Draft Development Plan [Internet]. Sekhukhune district municipality; 2018. Available from: https://www.sekhukhunedistrict.gov.za/sdm-admin/documents/2020-2021%20Draft%20DDP-IDP%20and%20Budget.pdf.
IHS Markit. Products & services [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Mar 23]. Available from: https://www.ihsmarkit.co.za/. https://www.ihsmarkit.co.za/.
Adjaye-Gbewonyo K, Avendano M, Subramanian SV, Kawachi I. Income inequality and depressive symptoms in South Africa: a longitudinal analysis of the national income dynamics study. Health Place. 2016;42:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.08.013.
Brophy T, Branson N, Daniels RC, Leibbrandt M, Mlatsheni C, Woolard I. National Income Dynamics Study panel user manual [Internet]. Cape Town; 2018. Available from: http://www.nids.uct.ac.za/images/documents/20180831-NIDS-W5PanelUserManual-V1.0.pdf.
Reynolds NR, Sun J, Nagaraja HN, Gifford AL, Wu AW, Chesney MA. Optimizing measurement of self-reported adherence with the ACTG adherence questionnaire: a cross-protocol analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;46(4):402–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0b013e318158a44f.
Dykstra PA, Kalmijn M, Komter AE, Liefbroer A, Mulder CH. Codebook of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study, a multi-actor, multi-method panel study on solidarity in family relationships, wave 1 [Internet]. NKPS Working Paper No. 4. 2005. Available from: https://matthijskalmijn.nl/onewebmedia/NKPS%20Codebook%20Wave%202.pdf.
Osborn CY, Davis TC, Bailey SC, Wolf MS. Health literacy in the context of HIV treatment: introducing the brief estimate of health knowledge and action (BEHKA)-HIV version. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(1):181–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-008-9484-z.
Gumede SB, de Wit JBF, Venter WDF, Lalla-Edward ST. Study protocol: Strengthening understanding of effective adherence strategies for first-line and second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in selected rural and urban communities in South Africa. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(12 December):e0261107. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261107.
Luborsky L, Barber JP, Siqueland L, Johnson S, Najavits LM, Frank A, et al. The revised helping alliance questionnaire (HAq-II): psychometric properties. J Psychother Pract Res. 1996;5(3):260–71.
Cosway R, Endler NS, Sadler AJ, Deary IJ. The coping inventory for stressful situations: factorial structure and associations with personality traits and psychological health. J Appl Biobehav Res. 2000;5(2):121–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9861.2000.tb00069.x.
Kalichman SC, Simbayi LC. HIV testing attitudes, AIDS stigma, and voluntary HIV counselling and testing in a black township in Cape Town, South Africa. Sex Transm Infect. 2003;79(6):442–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.79.6.442.
Kocalevent RD, Hinz A, Brähler E. Standardization of the depression screener Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in the general population. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013;35(5):551–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.04.006.
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–13. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
Mannheimer SB, Mukherjee R, Hirschhorn LR, Dougherty J, Celano SA, Ciccarone D, et al. The CASE adherence index: a novel method for measuring adherence to antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Care. 2006;18(7):853–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120500465160.
World Health Organisation. Consolidated ARV guidelines 2013, vol. 14, no. 7. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2013. p. 269.
Bock H, Jäggi A, Meyer U, Dach R, Beutler G. Impact of GPS antenna phase center variations on precise orbits of the GOCE satellite. Adv Space Res. 2011;47:1885–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2011.01.017.
WHO. HIV drug resistance report 2021 [Internet]. World Health Organization. 2021. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255896/9789241512831-eng.pdf?sequence=1.
Hermans LE, Ter Heine R, Schuurmana R, Tempelman HA, Burgerd DM, Vervoortf SCJ, et al. A randomized study of intensified antiretroviral treatment monitoring versus standard-of-care for prevention of drug resistance and antiretroviral treatment switch. AIDS. 2022;36(14):1959–68. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000003349.
Chen SCC, Yu JKL, Harries AD, Bong CN, Kolola-Dzimadzi R, Tok TS, et al. Increased mortality of male adults with AIDS related to poor compliance to antiretroviral therapy in Malawi. Trop Med Int Health. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02029.x.
Hawkins C, Chalamilla G, Okuma J, Spiegelman D, Hertzmark E, Aris E, et al. Sex differences in antiretroviral treatment outcomes among HIV-infected adults in an urban Tanzanian setting. AIDS. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283471deb.
Moucheraud C, Paul-Schultz J, Mphande M, Banda BA, Sigauke H, Kumwenda V, et al. Gendered differences in perceptions and reports of wellbeing: a cross-sectional survey of adults on ART in Malawi. AIDS Care. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2021.2014778.
Yehia BR, Rebeiro P, Althoff KN, Agwu AL, Horberg MA, Samji H, et al. Impact of age on retention in care and viral suppression. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;68(4):413–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000489.
Yehia BR, Stephens-Shields AJ, Fleishman JA, Berry SA, Agwu AL, Metlay JP, et al. The HIV care continuum: changes over time in retention in care and viral suppression. PLoS ONE. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129376.
Zanoni BC, Sibaya T, Cairns C, Lammert S, Haberer JE. Higher retention and viral suppression with adolescent-focused HIV clinic in South Africa. PLoS ONE. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190260.
Clouse K, Pettifor A, Maskew M, Bassett J, Van Rie A, Gay C, et al. Initiating antiretroviral therapy when presenting with higher CD4 cell counts results in reduced loss to follow-up in a resource-limited setting. AIDS. 2013;27(4):645–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835c12f9.
Ford N, Kranzer K, Hilderbrand K, Jouquet G, Goemaere E, Vlahakis N, et al. Early initiation of antiretroviral therapy and associated reduction in mortality, morbidity and defaulting in a nurse-managed, community cohort in Lesotho. AIDS. 2010;24(17):2645–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e32833ec5b2.
Takarinda KC, Harries AD, Shiraishi RW, Mutasa-Apollo T, Abdul-Quader A, Mugurungi O. Gender-related differences in outcomes and attrition on antiretroviral treatment among an HIV-infected patient cohort in Zimbabwe: 2007–2010. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;30:98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2014.11.009.
Skovdal M, Campbell C, Madanhire C, Mupambireyi Z, Nyamukapa C, Gregson S. Masculinity as a barrier to men’s use of HIV services in Zimbabwe. Glob Health. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-7-13.
Smith JA, Braunack-Mayer A, Wittert G. What do we know about men’s help-seeking and health service use? Med J Aust. 2006;184:81–3. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00124.x.
Rosen S, Fox MP, Gill CJ. Patient retention in antiretroviral therapy programs in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040298.
Cornell M, Schomaker M, Garone DB, Giddy J, Hoffmann CJ, Lessells R, et al. Gender differences in survival among adult patients starting antiretroviral therapy in South Africa: a multicentre cohort study. PLoS Med. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001304.
Chinyakata R, Roman NV, Msiza FB. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the barriers to accessing health care services in rural settings: a human capabilities approach. Open Public Health J. 2021. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874944502114010336.
Nachega JB, Uthman OA, Peltzer K, Richardson LA, Mills EJ, Amekudzi K, et al. Lien entre le suivi de la thérapie antirétrovirale et le statut professionnel: Revue systématique et méta-analyse. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93(1):29–41. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.14.138149.
Weiser SD, Leiter K, Bangsberg DR, Butler LM, Percy-De Korte F, Hlanze Z, et al. Food insufficiency is associated with high-risk sexual behavior among women in Botswana and Swaziland. PLoS Med. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040260.
Hadley C, Lindstrom D, Tessema F, Belachew T. Gender bias in the food insecurity experience of Ethiopian adolescents. Soc Sci Med. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.025.
Aberman NL, Rawat R, Drimie S, Claros JM, Kadiyala S. Food security and nutrition interventions in response to the aids epidemic: assessing global action and evidence. AIDS Behav. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0822-z.
Turner BJ, Laine C, Cosler L, Hauck WW. Relationship of gender, depression, and health care delivery with antiretroviral adherence in HIV-infected drug users. J Gen Intern Med. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20122.x.
Waldron EM, Burnett-Zeigler I, Wee V, Ng YW, Koenig LJ, Pederson AB, et al. Mental health in women living with HIV: the unique and unmet needs. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325958220985665.
van Schalkwyk C, Dorrington RE, Seatlhodi T, Velasquez C, Feizzadeh A, Johnson LF. Modelling of HIV prevention and treatment progress in five South African metropolitan districts. Sci Rep. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85154-0.
Vitoria M, Hill A, Ford N, Doherty M, Clayden P, Venter F, et al. The transition to dolutegravir and other new antiretrovirals in low-income and middle-income countries: what are the issues? AIDS. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001845.
UNAIDS. Better integration of mental health and HIV services needed [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/presscentre/featurestories/2018/october/mental-health-and-hiv-services#:~:text=People%20living%20with%20HIV%20are,at%20higher%20risk%20of%20HIV.
Sewell J, Daskalopoulou M, Nakagawa F, Lampe FC, Edwards S, Perry N, et al. Accuracy of self-report of HIV viral load among people with HIV on antiretroviral treatment. HIV Med. 2017;18(7):463–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12477.
Zhang Q, Li X, Qiao S, Shen Z, Zhou Y. Comparing self-reported medication adherence measures with hair antiretroviral concentration among people living with HIV in Guangxi, China. AIDS Res Ther. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-020-00265-4.
Kabore L, Muntner P, Chamot E, Zinski A, Burkholder G, Mugavero MJ. Self-report measures in the assessment of antiretroviral medication adherence: comparison with medication possession ratio and HIV viral load. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2015;14(2):156–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325957414557263.
Mills EJ, Nachega JB, Bangsberg DR, Singh S, Rachlis B, Wu P, et al. Adherence to HAART: a systematic review of developed and developing nation patient-reported barriers and facilitators. PLoS Med. 2006;3:2039–64. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030438.
Stirratt MJ, Dunbar-Jacob J, Crane HM, Simoni JM, Czajkowski S, Hilliard ME, et al. Self-report measures of medication adherence behavior: recommendations on optimal use. Transl Behav Med. 2015;5:470–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0315-2.
Been SK, Yildiz E, Nieuwkerk PT, Pogány K, Van De Vijver DAMC, Verbon A. Self-reported adherence and pharmacy refill adherence are both predictive for an undetectable viral load among HIV-infected migrants receiving cART. PLoS ONE. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186912.
Voss JG, Cesan A, Jensen K, Yahiaoui A, Steiner C, Bajwa S, et al. Agreement between self-reported knowledge and medical record data. Clin Nurs Res. 2015;24(3):318–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773814526753.
Minzi M, Gustafsson, Mugoyela V. Correlation between lamivudine plasma concentrations and patient self-reported adherence to antiretroviral treatment in experienced HIV patients. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2011. https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s23625.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the ITREMA participants and investigators. The ITREMA trial was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW) and NWO-WOTRO Science for Global Development (Grant No: 205300004) and the ZONMW VIMP (Grant No: 2053000041). This sub-study was supported by the Consortium for Advanced Research Training in Africa (CARTA). CARTA is jointly led by the African Population and Health Research Center and the University of the Witwatersrand. The statements and views made in this article are solely the responsibility of the authors.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of the Witwatersrand. SBG is funded by the Carnegie Corporation of New York (Grant No. G-19-57145), The Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Grant No. 54100113), Uppsala Monitoring Centre and the DELTAS Africa Initiative (Grant No. 107768/Z/15/Z). The DELTAS Africa Initiative is an independent funding scheme of the African Academy of Sciences (AAS)’s Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa (AESA) and supported by the New Partnership for Africa’s Development Planning and Coordinating Agency (NEPAD Agency) with funding from the Wellcome Trust (UK) and the UK government. The statements made and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the Fellow. WDFV and STL-E are supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (Award Number UG3HL156388). The content of this publication is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
For the ITREMA project: AMJW-Principal Investigator, LEH-Local study medical doctor and coordinator, HAT, WDFV and JBFW-co-investigators. For this sub-study: SBG-study design, SBG and LEH-data extraction, analysis and interpretation, SBG-Wrote the initial draft, SBG, WDFV, JBFW, AMJW, STL-E, HAT, LEH-Contributed to subsequent drafts. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
AMJW reports grants or contracts from an Investigator-initiated grant from Gilead global for the study of HIV Integrase resistance (Rosetta) (pending, grant to institution), Health Holland ICD-ICK4HIVCure (paid to institution), and ZonMW (Dutch government, paid to institution); consulting fees from Gilead, ViiV/GSK, and Janssen (paid to institution); payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Virology Education and the Southern African HIV Clinicians Society (paid to institution). AMJW Serves as a CEO for the European Society for Antiviral Research (ESAR) (unpaid), as governing Board member European AIDS Clinical Society, Chair of the European AIDS conference 2021 (unpaid, travel expenses paid to Institution), Member of the WHO Resnet (unpaid, travel expenses paid to Institution), Chair of the IAS-USA HIV drug resistance panel (unpaid), and as an Organizing Committee member of the European HIV and Hepatitis Meeting (unpaid, travel expenses paid to Institution). WDFV received funding for the ADVANCE RCT through his institution from UNITAID, USAID, and SAMRC, and received study drug from ViiV Healthcare and Gilead Sciences. WDFV also reports funding for his unit from the Bill and Melinda Gates, Foundation, National Institutes for Health, UNITAID, Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) and the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF), and received drug donations from Merck and J&J Sciences for investigator-led clinical studies. The unit leads investigator-led studies that receive financial support from Merck and ViiV and is involved in commercial drug studies for Merck. The unit performs evaluations of diagnostic devices for multiple biotech companies. WDFV. Also receives honoraria for educational talks and advisory board membership for Gilead, ViiV, Mylan, Merck, Adcock-Ingram, Aspen, Abbott, Roche, J&J, Sanofi and Virology Education; participates on DSMB for NIH International; is currently an unpaid board member for Dira Sengwe and was an unpaid board member for SAHCS. None of the ADVANCE RCT funders were involved in the design, execution, or analysis of this study. All other authors report no potential conflicts.
Ethical Approval
Ethics approval for the ITREMA trial was obtained from the University of Pretoria Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref Number: 69/2015) and the Department of Health, Limpopo province (Ref No 4/2/2). Ethical clearance for this sub-study was obtained from the University of the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee (M190641), and approval was provided by the Johannesburg Health District (DRC Ref: 2019-10-005, National Health Research Database Reference Number: GP_201910_031).
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gumede, S.B., Wensing, A.M.J., Lalla-Edward, S.T. et al. Predictors of Treatment Adherence and Virological Failure Among People Living with HIV Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy in a South African Rural Community: A Sub-study of the ITREMA Randomised Clinical Trial. AIDS Behav 27, 3863–3885 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-023-04103-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-023-04103-2