Abstract
It is vital to explore the potential of homegardens as (HGs) one of the major Trees Outside Forest sources in the Upper Mahaweli Catchment (UMC) in Sri Lanka, to restore ecosystem services lost due to large-scale deforestation. Woody tree diversity of HGs was assessed using diversity indices in selected agro-ecological regions of UMC. Then biophysical, socio-economic and institutional factors affecting the tree diversity of HGs were assessed. Data was collected from woody tree species from a 500 random sample of HGs located in two major districts in UMC using a resource assessment survey coupled with a household survey. A multiple linear regression analysis was implemented with primary and secondary data, using the STATA software. A total of 64,163 trees were enumerated and 110 woody tree species from 38 families were recorded. Shannon index, Simpson index Margalef and Evenness index ranged from 1.51–3.21, 0.32–0.91, 2.06–8.76 to 0.34–0.71 respectively. The majority of Agro-ecological regions such as Upcountry Intermediate Zone–IU2, Mid country Intermediate Zone–IM3a, Upcountry Wet Zone–WU2b, Mid country Wet Zone–WM2a, WM2b and IM3c recorded high tree diversity. Comparatively high evenness recorded in agro-ecological regions of Upcountry Intermediate Zone–IU2, Mid-country Wet Zone–WM2a and Upcountry Intermediate Zone–IU3d., is due to the rapid spreading of exotic species. According to the regression model (R2–50%, p < 0.01), several factors affected positively and negatively on tree diversity. Tree diversity in the majority of HGs located in UMC was similar to some South-Asian tropical forests, indicating the high potential of HGs in the ecological restoration of degraded UMC landscapes. Therefore, incentive-based policy instruments should be introduced to enhance the tree diversity of HGs to restore ecosystem services and the ecological sustainability of the UMC.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
There is a growing awareness of trees outside forests (TOFs) in many countries all over the world with their uses in providing most of the ecosystem services provided by forests such as provisioning services, regulatory services and supporting services (De Foresta et al. 2013). Therefore, they have a high potential for restoration capacity of loss of ecosystem services in areas where there is a lack of tree cover due to large-scale deforestation (Carle et al. 2002). TOFs comprise of wide range of approaches and technologies for restoring degraded lands. Homegardens (HGs) in the tropics provide the best examples as these human-dominated landscapes play an important role in biodiversity conservation while sustaining livelihood (Mohri et al. 2023; Ciccarese et al. 2012; Albuquerqueet et al. 2005; Pushpakumara et al. 2012; Kumar and Nair 2004). Mixed planted tree species may raise biodiversity and ecosystem service status more than those of monoculture or few dominant tree species based conventional restoration strategies (Kelty 1992; Brockerhoff et al. 2017; Udayana et al. 2020). From a genetic and agronomic diversity point of view, HGs are well suited for in-situ conservation of plant genetic resources harbouring some wild relatives of plants and rare species while providing habitats for various faunal species (Watson 2002; Eyasu et al. 2020; Abebe 2005; Galluzzi et al 2010). In addition, tropical HGs contribute significantly to mitigating climate change impacts at the global level in different scales in various regions. In Sri Lanka, estimates on above-ground biomass carbon stocks were in dry zone HGs ranging from 10 to 55 Mg C ha−1 with a mean value of 35 Mg C ha−1, whereas carbon stocks in wet zone HGs range from 48 to 145 Mg C ha−1 with a mean value of 87 Mg C ha−1.
As it is evident that tropical HGs provide an array of ecosystem services they have a significant potential to compensate the loss of ecosystem services due to deforestation and forest degradation. Moreover, restoration by reforestation through forest plantation is often a costly, time-intensive process that typically takes many years to achieve the desired outcomes (Stanturf et al. 2012; Kerrie et al. 2012; Wainaina et al. 2020; Adams 2015). Moreover, the government of a country needs to allocate a large amount of funds to restore degraded sensitive landscapes such as upper catchments (Brancalion et al. 2019). In this context, the promotion of tree-rich TOFs is a cost-effective option for the governments to incorporate into restoration programs since TOFs like HGs are managed privately by individuals for their multifunctional benefits (Wainaina et al. 2020; Adams 2015; Hillbrand et al. 2017). The Upper Mahaweli Catchment (UMC) in Sri Lanka is known as the heart of the country due to its ecological and socio-economic significance to the country. It is located in the central highlands of Sri Lanka, which was declared as a sensitive area by the Soil Conservation Act of Sri Lanka (1996). The natural forest cover of the UMC has gradually decreased during the last two centuries and is subjected to large-scale deforestation due to plantation agriculture followed by extensive vegetable cultivation (Wickramagamage 1998; Hevawasam 2010). Thus, steep slopes are exposed to severe soil erosion and landslide hazards (Wickramagamage 1990). A number of negative consequences due to land use changes in UMC over the past decades have been recorded in previous studies (Hevawasam 2010; Gunawardhana et al. 2018). As a result, the majority of lands of highly sensitive UMC catchment landscape have been degraded and become a fragile state. Therefore, ecological restoration of the degraded catchment landscape is a priority concern in Sri Lanka.
As HGs are one of the major land uses in UMC and their capacity of restoring most of the ecosystem services that are provided by forests they can be considered one of the best candidates to include in catchment restoration programs. However, the real restoration capacity of ecosystem services of HGs is mainly determined by the extent as well as the qualitative characteristics of HGs. Fundamentally the qualitative characteristics are determined by the level of biodiversity (Fernandes and Nair 1986). Tree diversity is one of the important components of the biodiversity of a TOF system (Marchetti et al. 2018; Kharal and Nath Oli 2009; Tesfaye et al. 2014). A study conducted on a geospatial assessment to identify land use changes of the UMC over the past 25-year period from 1992 to 2017 quantitatively in terms of extent, revealed that the remaining forest cover of the UMC continued as more or less the same for the past 25 years in Upper Mahaweli Catchment while the area under HGs has increased by 60% (Herath et al. 2021). However, there is a shortage of research conducted to estimate tree diversity-related parameters on macro-level landscapes as catchments especially in Sri Lanka. In addition, the qualitative characteristics of HGs are determined by a number of biophysical factors reflected in a country’s agroecological regions (Agro-ecological Zoning Guidelines 1996). Therefore, it is essential to assess the tree diversity of HGs in terms of agro-ecological regions. Moreover, the tree diversity of HGs is highly influenced by a number of socio-economic factors (Karunarathna and Gunatilake 2002; Korale-Gedara et al. 2012) in addition to biophysical factors. There are a number of institutional-related factors which also influence the tree diversity in TOF-related land uses including HGs (Motuma et al. 2008). Nevertheless, the evaluation of tree diversity considering those factors on the catchment landscape level is almost non-existent except few studies (Tesfaye et al. 2014; Araria et al. 2020) on the catchment scale in Sri Lanka.
Therefore, the main objective of this study was to assess tree diversity-related parameters of HGs and biophysical, socio-economic, and institutional-related factors affecting the biodiversity of HGs. The scientific information generated by this study will be highly useful for policymakers to formulate policy strategies to promote tree- rich HGs as a low-cost effective strategy to restore ecological services lost from deforested and degraded catchment landscapes.
Methodology
Study area
Upper Mahaweli Catchment is the study area which is the major catchment in Sri Lanka that covers 15% of the land in the Country (Fig. 1). It lies between longitude 80° 25ʹ to 81° 01ʺ East and latitude 6° 45ʹ to 7°30ʺ North and encompasses areas in Central, Uva and Sabaragamuwa provinces (De Silva 1997). Elevation ranges from 2717 m at Pidurutalagala (Gibbon 1990) which is the highest summit in the country, to 150 m at Rantembe. The catchment receives an average annual rainfall of about 2500 mm, western slopes of the catchment receive higher rainfall of up to 5500–6000 mm per year (Zubair 2003). The total surface area is 3110.81 km2 with the sub-catchments of Kotmale, Victoria, Randenigala, Rantembe and Uma oya. It has a rugged topography, with a mean slope gradient varying from 5 to 30°. Five main soil types have been identified within the catchment with Red Yellow Podzolic soil is the dominant type, covering approximately 60% of the area (Hevawasam 2010) along with other soil types such as Immature Brown Loam, Reddish Brown Latasol, Mountain Regosols and Bog and Half-bog soils (Punyawardhene et al. 2003).
According to the 75% expectancy of annual rainfall, Sri Lanka can be divided into three major agro-climatic regions Wet Zone, Dry Zone and Intermediate Zone (Panabokke 1996). The Wet Zone covers the majority of the south-west region of Sri Lanka and the central highlands receive an annual rainfall above 2500 mm. The Dry Zone receives the annual rainfall less than 1750 mm and Intermediate Zone receives 1750–2500 mm of annual rainfall. Sri Lanka can be divided further into three major elevation zones such as Low Country where the elevation is below 300 m, Up Country where the elevation is above 900 m and Mid Country where the elevation ranges between 300 and 900 m. Based on these rainfall and elevation categories, there are 24 agro-climatic regions have been identified in Sri Lanka (Panabokke and Kannangara 1975). This classification system was further improved recently considering relief and soil characteristics and subdivided the major regions and classified into 46 agro-climatic regions (Punyawardhene et al. 2003). There are 21 agro-ecological sub-regions covered by UMC which were 6 sub-regions from Mid-country Intermediate Zone (IM), 6 sub-regions from Upcountry Intermediate Zone (IU), 5 sub-regions from Mid-country Wet Zone (WM) and 4 sub-regions from Upcountry Wet Zone (WU) (Fig. 2).
Methods
Primary and Secondary data collection
The first task of this assessment was to estimate the tree diversity of HGs. Primary data required to estimate tree diversity parameters was collected through a resource assessment survey carried out for selected HGs of UMC. Trees in HGs were enumerated. To select the trees the standard definition provided by the FAO to define a tree was considered. The study considered trees with diameter at breast height (DBH) for the resource assessment survey in accordance with FAO standard definition. During the resource assessment survey, the tree counts of all tree species in each selected HG in the study area were recorded. The knowledge of the researchers and the local knowledge of HG owners were utilized to identify tree species of HGs. They were confirmed by consulting a Botanist. Tree species nomenclature was done using the literature (Senaratna 2001; Wijesinghe 1994).
Sampling technique: The entire HG was considered as a sample. There are three districts covered by the UMC area. However, the main land use type in Kandy and Badulla district is HGs. Nuwara-Eliya district is mainly covered with tea land use. Therefore, only the Kandy and Nuwara-Eliya districts were considered to obtain the necessary data for the analysis. Divisional Secretariate Divisions (DSDs) are the administrative level next to the districts. The Gramaseva Niladhari Divisions (GNDs) are the lowest administrative units after the DSDs. To select the HGs which were taken as samples, a stratified and randomized sampling technique was used to obtain a total of 500 samples. The Kandy and Badulla districts were taken as strata. Data from HGs from selected 28 GNDs from four DSDs in the Kandy district and twenty GNDs from four DSDs in the Badulla district were collected. The reason for selecting the random sampling technique was to capture a wide variation of HGs in terms of size, age, location and socio-economic status of HG owners.
Data analysis
Estimation of tree diversity
It is appropriate to use several indices to assess the diversity of HGs instead of using one or two (Morris et al. 2014). Tree species richness and Biodiversity of HGs in term of tree diversity was calculated using the following indices.
Shannon–Weiner diversity index (H) (Shannon and Wiener 1949; Krebs1985) is commonly used to estimate the biodiversity of a community. The equation for the Shannon Weiner index is as follows:
where H = Index of species diversity, pi = Proportion of the ith species, s = Total number of species.
Simpson index (D), a measure of species dominance or evenness was obtained using the following equation (Simpson 1949).
D = Simpson reciprocal diversity index (note: D is the real 1/D for Simpson’s Diversity) N = total number of organisms of all species found n = number of individuals of a particular species.
Evenness is the proportion of species or functional groups present on a site (Magurran 1988). Equitability of evenness refers to the degree of the relative dominance of each species in that area and it was calculated as:
where, H′ is the Shannon index, S is the number of species.
Margalef index measures species richness and it is highly sensitive to sample size although it tries to compensate for sampling effects diversity index was calculated by using the formula (Margalef 1968).
where, S = total number of species, N = total number of individuals.
The agro-ecological region which surveyed HGs located was taken into the analysis.
The next stage of the assessment was to analyse the biophysical, socio-economic and institutional-related factors that influence tree diversity.
Assessment of factors affecting tree diversity of HGs in UMC
Tree diversity is influenced by a number of socioeconomic factors in human-dominated landscapes like agroforestry systems (Scales and Marsden 2008; Kinyili et al. 2020; Gosling et al. 2021). In addition, agroforestry practices are determined by several socioeconomic aspects faced by HG owners. Some of them are directly or indirectly related to institutions’ policies and programs implemented by the government and non-governmental organizations. Therefore, the effect of such factors on the tree diversity of HGs was assessed using multiple linear regression analysis. As a measure of tree diversity, the Shannon–Weiner diversity index was used as the predictor variable. Socio-economic, agronomic, demographic, spatial and supporting facilities received by HG owners under various institutional policies were used as independent variables such as area of the HGs (ha), age of the HGs (years), Percentage area change of the HG (%) with respect to the area of HG in 1992 and 2020, agro-ecological region that GND (Gramaseva Niladhari Division) which is the lowest administrative boundary level in Sri Lanka) located (dummy), Sub catchment where the HG is located (dummy), distance to the nearest town (km), population density of GN Division (per square km), area of HG under pepper cultivation (ha), area of HG under tea cultivation (ha), area of HG vegetable cultivation (ha), Institutional Support of the Department of Agriculture, Forest Department, Mahaweli Authority of Sri Lanka and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) to develop HGs. Dummy variables were used to find the relationship between institutional support and Shannon’s diversity index. Those factors were regressed against the Shannon–Weiner diversity index of the home garden. The model applied for the regression analysis is mentioned below (Korale-Gedara et al. 2012).
where; y-is the Shannon Diversity Index, Xi: Independent variables as listed in Table 1. βi: Coefficients, Ɛ–stochastic error term.
In addition to the resource assessment, a household survey using a structured questionnaire was also carried out using the same HG owners or the households to collect primary data on socio-economic characteristics of HGs such as area of the HG, age, change area from 19,992 to 2020, the cultivated area of various types of crops etc. The secondary from secondary sources and the spatial data were derived from the Geographic Information System using the satellite images acquired in 2020 from the USGS data source. Primary and secondary data for each independent variable are listed in Table 1.
Statistical data analysis
Data were analysed using STATA statistical software to obtain estimates of the above-mentioned diversity indices. Kruskal–Wallis test (Conover 1999) was used to confirm the differences in tree diversity among agro-ecological regions and multiple linear regression analysis was done using the STATA software to identify the factors that influenced tree diversity of HGs.
Results and discussion
Tree diversity parameters
Altogether 64,163 trees were enumerated from 500 HGs surveyed in the study area of the UMC. The total area of the HGs surveyed was 132 ha. The tree density within HGs ranged from 95 to 2170 trees ha−1. The high density of trees in HGs revealed in this study agrees with the earlier findings in Sri Lanka (Perera and Rajapaksha 1991). The average tree density of HG is around 502 trees/ha. The average tree density of HGs is the same as some tropical forests in Uganda: 479 trees ha−1 (Gerald and David 2004) and the Eastern Ghats in India: 435–767 trees ha−1 (Naidu and Kumar 2016). Some authors have shown that there is a similarity between Kandyan HGs to a natural forest (Perera and Rajapaksha 1991). A total of 110 woody tree species categorized under 38 families were recorded in surveyed HGs in UMC. Similar occurrence of tree species has been recorded in tropical lowland evergreen forests in South Asia (Kumar and Nair 2004; Naidu and Kumar 2016; Sirinivas and Parthasarthy 2000; Shastri et al. 2002). It indicates that woody tree species occurrence in HGs in the UMC is almost close to that of South-Asian tropical evergreen forests.
Table 2 illustrates the list of species that occurred in surveyed HGs with their scientific name, family name, number of HGs that each species occurred, the percentage of occurred and the origin of each species. According to Table 2 the highest occurred tree species in surveyed HGs (92.8%) is Gliricidia sepium which is well-known as a multipurpose tree species, commonly found in HGs in UMC. Altogether around 85% of tree species belonged to native and endemic tree species. Approximately 11.8% of tree species were endemic. The majority of tree species are (74.50%) native to Sri Lanka, South Asia and the South-Eastern region. The most important finding in terms of in-situ conservation of floral diversity through HGS was the presence of endemic tree species even in small numbers in HGs. However, around 15% of tree species recorded were exotic species. Different mixtures of these species occurred in surveyed HGs. The presence of a mixture of tree species enhances the restoration capacity of the UMC in the long run.
Table 3 illustrates the tree species occurrence of different taxonomic families of the surveyed HGs. According to Table 3 the most dominant species recorded was from the family Fabaceae with 11 species. Interestingly, a similar finding has been recorded in HGs in Northeast India (Das and Das 2015), where out of the total of 47 families recorded, Fabacea was the dominant family with 18 species. The highest number of trees recorded in a species was also from the family Fabaceae (Table 3). The most abundant species in HGs in the current study area was Gliricidia sepium which belongs to the same family. The species was widely distributed in almost all agro-ecological regions in the study area due to fast growth with high adaptation capacity for various agroclimatic conditions, required fairly less space to accommodate in HGs and easiness of maintenance (Alamu et al. 2023). It is the most popular multipurpose tree species of HGs in Sri Lanka which is being used for various purposes such as live fencing of the boundaries of HGs, supporting trees for paper, fuelwood, fodder, nitrogen-rich green manure and as a shade tree in tea. The other families that recorded the highest number of species were Anacardiaceae and Myrtaceae (6–8 species), followed by Arecaceae and Rutaceae (4–6 species). The families that occurred with a fewer number of species are also listed in Table 3.
Out of the 38 species recorded in surveyed HGs of UMC, the most abundant top 10 are species illustrated in Table 4. Gliricidia sepium, Areca catechu, Cocos nucifera, Artocarpus heterophyllus and Mangifera zeylanica were the most abundant native species in HGs. Several commercially valuable exotic timber tree species—Swietenia macrophylla, Eucalyptus grandis, Grevillea robusta, Eucalyptus torelliana and Astonia macrophylla were also represented among the top 10 species (Table 4). According to Table 4, the most prominent feature was the high tree density of individual exotic species compared to native species. The government tree planting programs implemented by the Forest Department promoted these species due to their high timber value, fast growth, and high yield. However, concerning the total number of tree species found in HGs 85% of tree species are native to Sri Lanka and the region, including endemic tree species and, only 15% are exotic species (Table 2). Similar results have been recorded from a Tree Resource Outside Forests assessment in Sri Lanka carried out for a number of districts (Ariyadasa 2002).
Tree diversity of Homegardens in agro-ecological regions of the UMC
Trees in HGs in almost all agro-ecological regions such as IM1a, IM3a, IM3c, IU2, IU3d, IU3e, WM2a, WM2b, WM3b and WU2b form complex structures with a multi-layered configuration except in IU3d. A considerable space of HGs in IU3d is allocated for vegetable cultivation. HGs in IM3a, IU2, WM2a, and WU2b where typical HGs showed four to five vertical canopy layers. Table 5 illustrates tree diversity-related parameters estimated using Shannon Index, Simpson Index, Margalef Index and Evenness Index. The Shannon Index varied from 1.51 to 3.20 with an average of 2.30. Simpson Index varied from 0.91 to 0.32 with an average of 0.68, Margalef Index varied from 8.76 to 2.06 with an average of 6.27 and the evenness varied from 0.71 to 0.34 with an average of 0.51 in HGs in the study area. The results of the tree species diversity based on the diversity indices are comparable to the values reported by several workers in the region (Vargese and Balasubramanyan 1998; Tarakeswara et al. 2018; Saikia and Marsden 2016; Singh and Sahoo 2022).
The highest tree diversity was recorded in the IU2 agro-ecological region where world-famous tree-rich Kandyan HGs known as the Kandyan forest gardens are present. In IU2 the Shannon Index was 3.20, the Simpson Index was 0.89, Margalef Index was 8.76 and the Evenness Index was 0.51. According to the studies conducted in the regions, Bardhan et al. (2012) have shown that the Shannon–Weiner index for Natural Forest Cover in Bangladesh was 2.99. It can be seen that the tree diversity of HGs in some agro-ecological regions of UMC of Sri Lanka is somewhat similar to the natural forest in South Asian countries based on the Shannon index value. A higher Simpson value and less evenness of the surveyed HGs in the majority of agro-ecological regions in UMC implies that the tree diversity of HGs in both the Kandy and Badulla districts of UMC is high.
HGs in the majority of agro-ecological regions such as IM1a, IM3a, IM3c, IU2, WU2b and WM3b were dominated by native tree species except for a few agro-ecological regions such as IU3d, IU3e and WM2a indicate spreading of exotic species. As most of the exotic species have high timber value with a fast growth rate, they have been included in government afforestation, reforestation programs and tree planting programs in HGs too (Forestry Sector Master Plan 1995). In addition, the climate, and edaphic factors in most ecological are highly favourable for the spread of these species.
Factors affecting tree diversity using the Shannon diversity index of HGs
The results obtained from the multiple linear regression model to test the influence of various factors influencing tree diversity are described in Table 6. The model was statistically significant (p < 0.01, R2 = 58%). According to the results, out of all factors listed in Table 6, factors such as area of the HG, age of the HG, area under pepper cultivation, area under tea cultivation, distance to the nearest town and support from the Department of Agriculture and Department of Export Agriculture Crops significantly influenced the tree diversity of HGs while other factors had non-significant influence.
The results show that the Shannon’s Diversity Index is positively correlated (p < 0.01) with the area of the HG while it is negatively significant (p < 0.05) with the area squared. Therefore, it can be concluded that there is an inverted parabolic relationship between the Shannon index and the area of the HG. It implies that though the diversity increases with the area of HGs up to a certain extent, after that they tend to decrease, with further increase in size. These results are consistent with the findings of Korala-Gedara et al. (2012) on HGs in Sri Lanka. Interestingly, a similar observation was found during the field survey that high tree diversity in small HGs and less tree diversity in large-scale HGs. The main reason for the declining tree diversity of most of the large-size HGs is the conversion of them into crops such as pepper, tea, and annual crops especially in rural areas. Karunarathne and Gunathilake (2002) revealed that tree cultivation reduced with the increase in land holding size in rural areas in Sri Lanka.
It was observed a negative correlation between the tree species diversity and the age of the HG (p < 0.1). A similar finding was recorded in HGs in North-East India (Soibam and Kumar 2021). During the field survey, it was observed that the land extent of old HGs is much higher than that of young HGs. Hence, the majority of the area of the old HGs has been converted into crops such as tea, pepper, banana and vegetables. There was a significant negative (p < 0.01) relationship between the pepper cultivated area of the HG and Shannon’s Diversity Index. It was observed during the field survey that the majority of the area of the medium (0.2–0.8 ha) to large (> 0.8 ha) HGs have been converted into Pepper with Gliricidia sepium. Therefore, the number of Gliricidia trees on these HG was comparatively higher than the other woody tree species. Therefore, Shannon’s diversity index in HG with pepper cultivation was low. Growing more pepper in the HG brings financial returns to HG owners. The Shannon’s Diversity Index in HGs with tea cultivation was also relatively low and a similar relationship was found with pepper. HG owners gain financial returns by converting a certain extent of their land into tea, pepper or tea and pepper intercropping systems in some agro-ecological regions such as WM2a and IU3c of surveyed HGS in UMC.
There was a significant (p < 0.01) negative relationship between the annual crop-based area which is the vegetable-cultivated area of the HG and Shannon’s diversity index (Table 4). It also implies that the tree diversity of HG is decreased due to the conversion of a distinct area of HG into annual cash crops to gain short-term financial returns by removing trees. This tendency was observed in agroecological regions of IU3d and IU3e at higher elevations of UMC (Herath et al. 2021; Wickramagamage 1990). Shannon’s Diversity Index is low in HGs in DSDs such as Bandarawela and Walimada in the Badulla district, which are extensively vegetable-growing areas of the UMC. A similar relationship has been revealed in the Nuwara-Eliya district of UMC in Sri Lanka where vegetables are grown extensively (Herath et al. 2021).
There is a positive correlation between the population density of the DSD with Shannon’s diversity index a (p < 0.1). It was observed during field investigations that HG owner’s choices for selecting tree varieties in HGs are very wide in highly populated areas where diverse communities live. They try to incorporate a number of different varieties instead of a few, depending on their different requirements such as food, shade, fencing firewood, medicine and for decoration purposes. This type of composition increases Shannon’s diversity index in densely populated areas.
The Shannon’s diversity index has a positive relationship (p < 0.01) with distance to the nearest town from home gardens. These findings are in conformity with those reported by Kaya et al. (2002) and Abebe (2005) for tropical HGs. HGs in rural areas which were located away from towns grow a greater number of tree species with a higher number of individuals due to the availability of sufficient space. In addition to that, the conversion of HGs into monoculture crops such as tea and pepper with gliricidia or any other vegetable-based annual crops is comparatively low in HGs located near the town area. Similar findings were recorded in a study conducted to assess land use conversions of HGs in UMC in Sri Lanka (Herath et al. 2021) and in rural Ghana (Appiah et al. 2019).
HG owners receive numerous support directly or indirectly from various government and non-governmental organizations for the maintenance of their HGs through various programs. Hence tree diversity of HGs is also influenced by institutional support received by HG owners. It shows that the Support of the Department of the Agriculture and Support of the Department of Export Agriculture negatively and significantly (p < 0.1) correlated with the Shannon’s diversity index. The field investigation revealed that the Department of Agriculture promotes crops, the majority are non-tree species. The Department of Export Agriculture promotes spice crops including pepper cultivation. Under such situations, Shannon’s diversity index would reduce. The Forest Department is implementing a number of tree planting programs to promote tree cover in HGs as they are the major supply source of timber to the country (Forestry Sector Master Plan 1995; Ariyadasa 2002; Karunarathna and Gunathilaka 2002). However, the majority of plants they promote are exotic species as they possess high timber value, fast growth rate and are well adapted to most of the agroecological regions of UMC which finally affect tree diversity (Ministry of Mahaweli Development and Environment 2016). During the field survey, it was revealed that tree-planting programs implemented by NGOs promote native species. However, this influence was statistically not significant due to a limited number of NGO involvement.
Conclusion and recommendations
Tropical homegardens as Trees Outside Forest sources are capable of generating most of the ecosystem services provided by a forest. Catchment restoration is one of the best unexploited and under-recognized ecosystem services derived by tree rich homegardens to overcome a number of limitations encountered with afforestation and reforestation through plantation forests implemented by government and non-governmental organizations for the restoration of degraded landscapes in various countries including Sri Lanka. The capacity of restoring ecosystem services of homegardens is determined by their extent and their qualitative characteristics. Those parameters are influenced by a number of biophysical factors which are represented by the physical characteristics in agro-ecological regions which they occupy. In addition, socio-economic, demographic and institutional related factors also highly influence the tree diversity of HGs. Upper Mahaweli Catchment has a vital ecological and socio-economic significance to the Sri Lanka. However, it has been subjected to severe degradation due to large-scale deforestation over the past two centuries and practically it is impossible to enhance the natural forest cover. Homegardens are one of the major land uses in UMC which are having a great potential to compensate for the loss of ecosystem services due to deforestation and forest degradation. Homegardens in UMC have the potential to restore ecosystem services through human induce regeneration as well as natural regeneration in the long run. In this study, it was revealed that HGs in most of the agro-ecological regions of UMC possess high tree diversity based on the diversity indices. Therefore, the study suggests to promote a special incentive package to HG owners who are maintaining high tree diversity at the expense of their opportunity cost of converting them into other cash earning cultivations. This can be achieved by inclusion of HGs into climate change mitigation strategies through REDD + programs as a best potential candidate. However, relevant authorities should pay much attention to the spreading of exotic species in large numbers in certain agro-ecological regions which would result in the threat of diminishing native species. This study can be taken as a model to develop catchment restoration strategies through TOFs in other regions of the continent and the world.
References
Abebe T (2005) Diversity in homegarden agroforestry systems of Southern Ethiopia. PhD Dissertation, Wageningen University, Netherlands
Adams J (2015) Evaluating the success of forest restoration. University Honors Theses. Paper, p 178. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.182
Agro-ecological Zoning Guidelines (1996) Food and Agriculture Organization. Rome.
Alamu EO, Adesokan M, Fawole S, Maziya-Dixon B, Mehreteab T, Chikoye D (2023) Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp applications for enhancing soil fertility and crop nutritional qualities: a review. Forests 14(635):2–13
Albuquerque UP, Andrade LH, Caballero J (2005) Structure and floristic of homegardens in North-eastern Brazil. Arid Envi 62:491–506
Appiah DO, Asante F, Nketiah B (2019) Perspectives on agricultural land use conversion and food security in rural Ghana. Sci 9:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci1010014-1
Araria MG, Chirwa PW, Assede ESP (2020) Contrasting the effect of forest landscape condition to the resilience of species diversity in a human modified landscape: implications for the conservation of tree species. Land 9:1–19
Ariyadasa KP (2002) Assessment of tree resources in the homegardens of Sri Lanka. Food & Agriculture Organization, Rome
Punyawardena BVR, Bandara, Munasinghe TM, Banda MAK (2003) Agro-ecological map of Sri Lanka. Department of Agriculture, Sri Lanka
Bardhan S, Jose S, Biswas S, Kabir K, Rogers W (2012) Homegarden agroforestry systems: an intermediary for biodiversity conservation in Bangladesh. Agrofor Syst 85:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9515-7
Brancalion PHS et al (2019) What makes ecosystem restoration expensive? A systematic cost assessment of projects in Brazil. Bio Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108274
Brockerhoff EG, Barbaro L, Castagneyrol B et al (2017) Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services. Bio Cons 26:3005–3035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1453-2
Carle J, Vuorinen P, Lungo AD (2002) Status and trends in global forest plantation development. Forest Prod J 52(7):3–13
Ciccarese L, Mattsson A, Pettenella D (2012) Ecosystem services from forest restoration: thinking ahead. New for 43:543–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9350-8
Conover WJ (1999) Practical nonparametric statistics. Wiley, New York, vol 3, pp 127–192
Das T, Das AK (2015) Conservation of plant diversity in rural homegardens with cultural and geographical variation in three districts of Barak Valley, Northeast India. Econ Bot 69:57–71
De Foresta H, Somarriba E, Temu A, Boulanger D, Feuilly H, Gauthier, M (2013) Towards the Assessment of trees outside forests. Resources assessment working paper 183. FAO Rome. pp 5–22
Eyasu G, Tolera M, Negash M (2020) Woody species composition, structure, and diversity of homegarden agroforestry systems in southern Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Sciencedirect Heliyon J 6:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05500
FAO (1996) Guidelines: agro-ecological zoning. Food and Agricultural Organization, Soils Bull, Rome, Italy
Fernandes EC, Nair PR (1986) An evaluation of the structure and function of tropical homegardens. Agric Sys 21:279–310
Forestry Sector Master Plan (1995) Sri Lanka forestry sector master plan. Forestry Planning Unit, Forest Department, Ministry of Agriculture, Lands and Forestry, Colombo, Sri Lanka, pp 46–52
Galluzzi G, Eyzaguirre P, Negri V (2010) Home gardens: neglected hotspots of agro-biodiversity and cultural diversity. Biodivers Conserv 19:3635–3654
Gerald E, David KM (2004) Density and species diversity of trees in four tropical forests of the Albertine rift, western Uganda. Diver Distri 10:303–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-951600089
Gibbon H (1990) Land use planning in Upper Mahaweli Catchment, technical report. FOLUMP, Dangolla, Kandy, Sri Lanka
Gosling E, Knok T, Reith E, Caceres AR, Paul C (2021) Which socio-economic conditions drive the selection of agroforestry at the forest frontier? Envi Mag 67(6):1119–1136
Gunawardhana WDTM, Jayawardhana JMCK, Udayakumara PN Malavipathirana S (2018) Spatio-temporal variation of water quality and bioindicators of the Badulu Oya in Sri Lanka due to catchment disturbances. J Natl Sc Found of Sri Lanka 46:51–67
Herath HMBS (2021) Geospatial assessment on land-use changes of homegardens in Upper Mahaweli Catchment in Sri Lanka. Vidyodaya J Humanit Soc Sci 6:83–98. https://doi.org/10.31357/fhss/vjhss.v06i01.07
Herath HMBS, Pushpakumara DKNG, Hewson M, Wickramagamage P (2021) Spatial and temporal changes of homegarden land use as a tree resource outside forests in Upper Mahaweli Catchment of Sri Lanka: biophysical and socioeconomic determinants of major changes. Trop Agric Res 32:229–242
Hevawasam T (2010) Effect of land use in the Upper Mahaweli Catchment area on erosion, landslides, and siltation in hydropower reservoirs of Sri Lanka. J of Nat Sc Found Sri Lanka 38:3–14
Hillbrand A, Borelli S, Conigliaro M, Olivier A (2017) Agroforestry for landscape restoration Exploring the potential of agroforestry to enhance the sustainability and resilience of degraded landscapes. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp 13–15
Karunarathna KMR, Gunatilake HM (2002) Socio-economic factors affecting tree cultivation in home gardens in Kandy and Kegalle districts. Trop Agric Res 14:292–303
Kaya M, Kammesheidt L, Weidelt HJ (2002) The forest garden system of Saparuais land, Central Maluku, Indonisia and its role in maintaining tree species diversity. Agrofor Syst 63:53–62
Kelty MJ (1992) Comparative productivity of monoculture and mixed-species stands. In: Kelty MJ, Larson BC, Oliver CD (eds) The ecology and silviculture of mixed-species forests. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 125–141
Kerrie A, Wilson, Megan L et al (2012) The economics of restoration. In: Stanturf et al. (eds.) Forest land resto: integrating natural and social sciences, World Forests, vol 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5326
Kharal DK, Nath Oli BN (2009) An estimation of tree species diversity in rural farmland of Nepal. Banko Janakari. https://doi.org/10.3126/banko.8:2160
Kinyili BM, Ndunda E, Kitur E (2020) Socio-economic and institutional factors influencing adoption of agroforestry in arid and Semi-Arid (ASALs) areas of Sub Saharan Africa. Int J for Horti (IJFH) 6(1):8–18. https://doi.org/10.20431/2454-9487.0601002
Korale-Gedara P, Weerahewa J, Pushpakumara G, Kodithuwakku S (2012) Commercial orientation and its effects on plant diversity in homegardens: an empirical investigation of rural households in Sri Lanka. Sri Lankan J Agric Econ 14:18–42
Krebs CJ (1985) Ecology: the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. Harper and Row, New York
Kumar BM, Nair PKR (2004) The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agrofor Syst 61:135–152
Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Croom Helm, London, p 178
Marchetti M, Garfì V, Pisani C et al (2018) Inference on forest attributes and ecological diversity of trees outside forest by a two-phase inventory. Ann for Sci 75(2):37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595
Margalef R (1968) Perspective in ecological theory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Mattsson E, Ostwald M, Nissanka SP, Marambe B (2013) Homegardens as a multi-functional land-use strategy in Sri Lanka with focus on carbon sequestration. Ambio 42:892–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0390-x
Ministry of Mahaweli Development and Environment (2016) National Biodiversity Strategic Action Plan 2016–2022. Biodiversity Secretariat, Ministry of Mahaweli Development and Environment, Colombo Sri Lanka, pp 10–82
Mohri H, Lahoti S, Saito O et al (2023) Assessment of ecosystem services in homegarden systems in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, and Vietnam. Ecosyst Serv 5:124–136
Morris EK, Tancredi CT, Markus FM et al (2014) Choosing and using diversity indices: insights for ecological applications from the German biodiversity exploratory. Ecol Evol 4(18):3514–3524
Motuma T, Zebene A, Mulugeta L, Erik K (2008) Woody species diversity in a changing landscape in the south-central highlands of Ethiopia. Agric Eco Environ 128:52–58
Naidu M, Kumar OA (2016) Tree diversity, stand structure, and community composition of tropical forests in Eastern Ghats of Andhra Pradesh, India. J as-Pac Biodivers 9:328–334
Panabokke CR, Kannangara RPK (1975) The identification and demarcation of the agro-ecological regions of Sri Lanka. Proc Ann Sessions Sri Lanka Assoc Adv Sci 31(3):49
Panabokke CR (1996) Soils and agro-ecological environments of Sri Lanka. Natural Resources Series No, 2. Natural Resources, Energy and Science Authority of Sri Lanka, Colombo, pp 131–134
Perera AH, Rajapakse RMNA (1991) Baseline study of Kandyan forest gardens of Sri Lanka: structure, composition and utilization. For Ecol Mang 45:269–280
Pushpakumara DKNG, Marambe B, Silva GLLP, Weerahewa J, Punyawardhana BVR (2012) A review of research on homegardens in Sri Lanka: the status, importance, and future perspective. Tropi Agric 160:55–126
Saikia P, Marsden SJ (2016) Tree species diversity and its population and regeneration status in homegardens of upper Assam, Northeast India. J for Environ Sci 3(2):129–139
Scales BR, Marsden SJ (2008) Biodiversity in small-scale tropical agroforests: a review of species richness and abundance shifts and the factors influencing them. Environ Conserv 35(2):160–172
Senaratna LM (2001) A check list of the flowering plants. National Science Foundation 47/5, Maitland Place Colombo 7, Sri Lanka
Shannon CE, Wiener W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. Science 185:27–39
Shastri CM, Bhat DM, Nagaraja BC, Murali KS, Ravindranath NH (2002) Tree species diversity in a village ecosystem in Uttara Kannada district in Western Ghats, Karnataka. Curr Sci 82:1080–1084
Sigh SL, Sahoo UK (2022) Tree species composition, diversity and soil organic carbon stock in homegardens and shifting cultivation fallows of Mizoram, Northeast India. Agrofor Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00715-6
De Silva RP (1997) Spatiotemporal hydrological modelling with gis for the upper mahaweli catchment, Department of Natural Resources Management. PhD Thesis
Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688
Soibam LS, Kumar U (2021) Tree species composition, diversity and soil organic carbon stock in homegardens and shifting cultivation fallows of Mizoram, Northeast India. Vegetos 34:220–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-021-00194-1
Soil Conservation Act of Sri Lanka (1996) Department of Agriculture. P.O.Box 1 Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
Srinivas V, Parthasarathy N (2000) Comparative analysis of tree diversity and dispersion in the tropical lowland rainforests of Agumbe, Central Western Ghats, India. Trop Biodivers 7(1):45–60
Stanturf J, David L, Palle M (2012) Forest landscape restoration. Springer Dordrecht Heidelber, pp 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5326-6
Tarakeswara M, Naidu D, Premavani S, Suthari Venkaiah M (2018) Assessment of tree diversity in tropical deciduous forests of Northcentral Eastern Ghats, India. Geol Ecol Landsc 2(3):216–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/24749508.2018.1452479
Tesfaye S, Guyassa E, Raj AJ et al (2014) Land use and land cover change, and woody vegetation diversity in human driven landscape of Gilgel Tekeze Catchment, Northern Ethiopia. Int J for Res 614249:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/614249
Udayana C, Andreassen HP, Skarpe C (2020) Understory diversity and domposition after pdPlanting of teak and mahogany in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. J Sustain Forst 39:494–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2019.1686029
Vargese AO, Balasubramanyan K (1998) Structure, composition and diversity of the tropical wet evergreen forest of the Agasthyamalai region of Kerala, Western Ghats. J SA Nat Hist 4:87–98
Wainaina P, Minang PA et al (2020) Cost-benefit analysis of landscape restoration: a stocktake. Land 9(465):1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9110465
Watson JW (2002) Contribution of homegardens to in -situ conservation of plant genetic resources in farming systems. In: Proceedings of the second international homegardens workshops. Witzenhausen, Federal Republic of Germany. International Plant Genetic Resource Institute, Rome, pp 17–19
Wickkramagamage P (1990) A man’s role in the degradation of soil and water resources in Sri Lanka: a historical perspective. J Natl Sci Coun Sri Lanka 18:1–16
Wickramagamage P (1998) Large-scale deforestation for plantation agriculture in the hill country of Sri Lanka and its impact. Hydr Proc 12(13–14):2015–2028
Wijesinghe Y (1994) Checklist of woody perennial plants of Sri Lanka. Forest Department, Battamulla Sri Lanka, pp 1–155
Zubair L (2003) El Nino–southern oscillation influences on the Mahaweli stream flow in Sri Lanka. Int J Climato 23:1
Acknowledgements
The study was funded by the South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics (SANDEE) by providing a research grant to collect primary data. We wish to express our gratitude to the SANDEE and homegardens owners and key informants for allowing us to collect the required data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This research had been done by the corresponding author as a part of the PhD research study carried out at the Postgraduate Institute of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. It has been reviewed by all other authors as they are supervisors of the PhD study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Herath, H.M.B.S., Pushpakumara, D.K.N.G., Hewson, M. et al. Unexploited potentials of trees outside forests: catchment landscape restoration through homegardens in Upper Mahaweli Catchment in Sri Lanka. Agroforest Syst 98, 1641–1658 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-024-00973-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-024-00973-0