Abstract
The escalating prices of protein concentrate supplements and increasing demand for dairy products in Ethiopia call for preservation of surplus forage during the growing season, to be fed to dairy cows at time of feed shortage. The objective of this on-farm study was to evaluate the nutritive quality of Napier and Desho grass silages with tree legume (sesbania) and herbaceous legumes (alfalfa, lablab, and faba bean) as legume components. Napier or Desho grasses were ensiled in bags with each legume at 0, 20, 30 and 40% inclusion levels (fresh weight). Replicates included nine and six farms in Mecha and Ad’aa districts, respectively. Silage bags were opened after 60 days, samples were taken for chemical analyses and evaluated for physical features. Data were analyzed using a completely randomized design in SPSS and differences among means separated using Duncan’s. Silages were firm at Mecha and fairly firm at Ada’a. No mold appeared. pH values varied from 3.94 to 4.5 and increased (p < 0.001) with increasing levels of legume inclusion. The crude protein values followed a similar pattern to that of the pH. The fiber contents, NDF (p < 0.001) and ADF (p < 0.05/p < 0.01) declined while that of ADL increased (p < 0.001) with increasing legume inclusion levels. The different legume-based silages were assessed as highly palatable and revealed that the use of tree and herbaceous legumes can improve the nutritive quality of grasses.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Two-thirds of the global rural population are engaged in mixed crop-livestock systems (MCLS), producing around 50, 60 and 75% of the world’s cereals, meat, and milk (Paul et al. 2020). In Ethiopia, MCLS produce even 80 and 87% of the milk and meat, respectively. Seventy two percent of the national cattle population is in MCLS, with cattle being the dominant species for 70 to 90% of the livestock holding households (Shapiro et al. 2015). Crops and livestock play interdependent roles, with livestock providing draught power and manure for cropping, while crop residues provide feed for the livestock (Management Entity 2021).
In many developing countries, including Ethiopia, projections show that the demand for animal sourced foods (ASFs) will double by 2050 (Sattari et al. 2016), owing to human population growth, urbanization (Mekonnen et al. 2022), and rising incomes (van der Lee 2020). Thus, the increase in demand for roughages matching the increase in ASFs is equally inevitable. Nevertheless, scarcity of consistent availability of quantity and quality livestock feed is a major constraint of farmers in MCLS in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) including Ethiopia, especially during the dry season (Paul et al. 2020). Between 79 and 99% of the MCLS farmers experience feed shortages at some point of the year (Njarui et al. 2016). In Ethiopia, feed requirement is estimated at 126.35 million tons per year on dry matter basis, while the actual availability is 99.5 million tons per year (FAO 2018). Generally, feed costs cover 70% of the total cost of animal production (FAO 2019).
While there is a critical shortage of succulent green feed during the dry season and pasture production widely fluctuates, Ethiopian dairy farmers do not use improved feed conservation practices beyond hay making (Assefa et al. 2017). The increasing trend of dairy production in Ethiopia (Effa et al. 2017) and in other developing countries (Hawu et al. 2022) requires conservation of surplus forage during the growing season. Prices of commercial concentrate feed are also escalating over time. Animal feed inflation rate (45–55%) was higher than food inflation rate (24.1%) from July 2020 to July 2021 in Ethiopia (Negash 2022), justifying the need to look for alternatives. Most grasses used are low in protein values (Kebede et al. 2016) and diets based on grass only will not meet nutritional requirement of a lactating cow, thus requiring supplementation with sources of fermentable nitrogen and energy (Ofori and Nartey 2018). Tree and herbaceous legumes have multiple roles, including maintaining the natural resource base through soil stabilization, preventing soil erosion, contributing to soil fertility through microbial nitrogen fixation and organic matter, and climate change mitigation through carbon sequestration (Hanson and Ellis 2020).
Among the popular grass species used by smallholder dairy farmers in developing countries for feeding their animals are Napier/elephant (Pennisetum purpureum) and Desho (Pennisetum pedicellatum) grasses. The nutritive quality of Napier or Desho grass can be improved through incorporation of legumes (Hawu et al. 2022). Nevertheless, there is no information on the nutritive quality of grass silage that incorporates protein rich tree and herbaceous legumes in Ethiopia. This study, therefore, examined the effect of inclusion of different levels of sesbania (Sesbania sesban), alfalfa (Medicago sativa), lablab (Lablab purpureus), and local faba bean (Vicia faba) in Napier or Desho grass silage on physical and nutritional quality parameters through on-farm research.
Materials and methods
The studies were undertaken in Ada’a (East Shoa zone, Oromia Region) and Mecha districts (West Gojam zone, Amhara Region), Ethiopia (Fig. 1). The study districts are among the 39 districts where the Building Rural Income through Inclusive Dairy Business Growth in Ethiopia project (BRIDGE) undertakes different interventions along the dairy value chain. Both districts are in the mid-altitude areas of Ethiopia and are characterized by MCLS. In Mecha, altitude ranges from 1800 to 2500 m above sea level (masl) and annual rainfall is between 820 and 1250 mm (Astewel and Yihenew 2018). Most soils are acidic Nitisols, with a pH of 4.7–5.4 (Mekonnen 2015). The mean annual temperature ranges from 17 to 30 °C. At Ada’a, the altitude ranges from 1540 to 3100 masl, soils are mainly pellic vertisols with pH 6.38 to 7.09, the mean annual rainfall is 867 mm; the minimum and maximum temperature ranges are 9–13 °C and 22–26 °C, respectively.
Selection of farms and forage materials
The studies used an action research approach, undertaking on-farm trials together with farmers. The farmers were selected through the BRIDGE project by staff of the district livestock officers, based on their willingness to participate in the study. Nine farmers in Mecha district and six in Ada’a district were identified and used as replications. The farmers in each district were living near to each other. Thus, in each district, the farm-sites selected for planting the forage materials were similar in terms of agroecological conditions with respect to soil type, altitude, rainfall, temperatures, and slope. Napier and Desho grasses and alfalfa and lablab were planted in the plots of farmers in July 2021 during the main growing season. The splits of Desho and Napier grasses were planted at a rate of 20,000 and 10,000 plants ha−1, respectively. The seeding rates for alfalfa and lablab were 10 and 20 kg ha−1, respectively (Zewdu 2007). The choice of the legumes is based on their popularity in each district.
Experimental design and silage making procedures
The studies were intended to investigate the potential effect of each legume on its ensiling effect on the specific grass. Thus, the experiment was planned in a completely randomized design (CRD). In Ada’a district, the study examined silages from Desho grass (Areka variety) alone or with the inclusions of three levels of alfalfa or lablab (20, 30 and 40% by fresh weight). Similarly, in Mecha district, the study examined silages of Napier grass (ILRI accession 16,791) alone or with inclusion levels of alfalfa, sesbania and faba bean legumes (20, 30 and 40% by fresh weight) (Table 1). The faba bean herbage was purchased from a farmer who planted a local faba bean variety during the main growing season of 2021, as farmers commonly feed animals the herbage when they think the planting does not have good potential for seed production. Sesbania herbage was harvested from already existing sesbania trees planted about 2 and half years ago by farmers in the surrounding areas.
All herbage materials used in silage making (except sesbania) were harvested 5 to 7 cm above the ground using hand sickles. The Napier grass was harvested when the plant was at 1 to 1.2 m height, and the Desho grass at 0.8 to 1.0 m. The legumes were harvested when they were 15 to 25% flowering. At Mecha, the harvested herbages were wilted for about 6 to 24 h, depending on the moisture content, and were chopped to a length of about 3 to 5 cm, using a chopping machine (Brathma chopper made in Brazil by Trapp company, model TRP 80 G). At Ada’a, herbage was hand chopped to a similar length. The wilted and chopped grasses and legumes were weighed and mixed at different proportions, as indicated in Table 1. Molasses was added at 3% by weight of the herbage and was diluted after weighing with 1 to 2 L of water, as the molasses used was too thick for mixing. It was mixed with the herbage mixtures prior to ensiling. The silage was prepared using plastic bags, while compacting properly to exclude air using feet, hands and local compacting materials. For each treatment, two plastic bags were prepared per farmer, each weighing 100 to 120 kg. The plastic bags containing the ensiled feed were kept in a safe place under a shed.
Silage sampling and assessment
After 55 to 60 days of ensiling, the plastic bags were opened one by one for the evaluation of the physical features of the silages (color, aroma, mold appearance, and texture) and fermentation characteristics (DM, pH and temperature). The physical features were inspected and subjectively judged under field conditions by a team who were trained on how to judge silage physical features. The color (1 = dark or deep brown; 2 = light brown; 3 = pale yellow; 4 = yellowish green) and aroma (1 = putrid or rancid; 2 = pleasant; 3 = sweet; 4 = very sweet) were rated according to the method used by Muhammad et al. (2009), while the texture was assessed using a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 = slimy; 1 = very soft; 2 = soft; 3 = fairly firm; 4 = firm (Ososanya and Olorunnisomo 2015). The pH of the samples was determined using a digital pH meter (pH meter Hanna with electrode, range 0–14 pH ± 1 pH cat.no ELC1691) in the field and in a laboratory. The temperature of the silage at each site was measured using a thermometer with an accuracy of 0.1 °C.
The palatability of the different silages was evaluated through the observation of the feeding behaviour of the cows in the field and interviews with the farmers, and evaluating the consumption of silage after each feed delivery.
Laboratory analysis
Immediately upon opening, silage samples were taken from each of the treatments per farmer (two samples), put in plastic bags tied properly, and kept in a refrigerator. The samples, oven dried at a temperature of 65 °C for 72 h, were used for laboratory analysis to determine chemical composition after grinding them to pass a 1-mm sieve. The samples were analyzed for DM, ash, crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL). Total ash content was determined by oven drying the samples overnight at 105 °C and by combusting the samples in a muffle furnace at 550 °C for 6 h (AOAC 1990). Nitrogen (N) content was determined following the micro-Kjeldahl digestion, distillation and titration procedures the CP content was estimated by multiplying the nitrogen content by 6.25. The structural plant constituents (NDF, ADF and ADL) were determined according to the procedure of Van Soest and Robertson (1985).
Statistical analysis
Qualitative information regarding the study obtained from farmers was summarized and interpretated qualitatively. This included the scoring results of the physical characteristics of the silage, such as color, aroma, mold appearance and texture. Fermentation characteristics and chemical composition data of the silages were analyzed using the SPSS general linear model (GLM) procedures for analysis of variance. The data were subjected to one-way ANOVA test and the difference among the treatment means separated using Duncan’s multiple range test. The statistical model was: Yij = µ + Ti + Eij, where Yij = the observation ij, µ = the overall mean, Ti = the effect due to treatment i, and Eij = the experimental error. Probability values less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) were considered significant.
Results
Physical features and fermentation qualities of silages
The results of the physical features and fermentation qualities of the silages at both locations are shown in Tables 2 and 3 and Figs. 2 and 3. Accordingly, the color of Desho and Napier grass silages were pale yellow while that made from the grass-legume inclusions were yellowish green. The other physical characteristics of the different silages were similar, except for texture, which is 'fairly firm’ at Ada’a and ‘firm’ at Mecha.. At Ada’a, the mean DM of the silages ranged from 30.27 to 31.94% while at Mecha it varied between 31.88 to 32.56%. The overall analysis showed that there was no significant difference in DM content (p > 0.05) among the treatments in each district (Figs. 2 and 3). The pH of the silages varied from 3.98 to 4.44 at Ada’a and from 3.93 to 4.47 at Mecha. The pH of the silages prepared with the inclusion of the legume was higher (p < 0.001) than the pH of the silage prepared from the grass alone and increasing the level of each legume resulted in increased pH (p < 0.001). The temperatures of the silages, which fell with the temperature range of the study areas, was not affected (p > 0.05) by the inclusion of each legume and the levels of inclusion of the legumes. It ranged from 20 to 20.33 °C at Ada’a and 19.89 to 20.11 °C at Mecha.
Chemical composition of the different silages
The chemical composition of the silages is presented in Tables 3 and 4. The CP contents of the silages significantly increased (p < 0.001) with increased legume inclusion levels (Desho grass CP = 8.68%; CP of average legume inclusion levels = 13.34%; Napier grass CP = 7.2%; CP of average legume inclusion levels = 13.94%) and the ash content followed a similar pattern except at the 40% inclusion level, where the values declined. The fiber contents of the silages, NDF (p < 0.001) and ADF (p < 0.05/p < 0.01) declined in response to legume inclusion at different levels, while ADL increased with increasing forage legume inclusion levels (Tables 4 and 5).
Discussion
Physical features and fermentation quality
The difference in color between the grass-alone silages and the grass-legume mixture silages observed in our study could be attributed to the inclusion of legumes in the latter. The difference in texture of the silages at Mecha and Ada’a is attributed to the difference in chopping technique, i.e., hand chopping in Ada’a vs. machine chopping in Mecha, where the machine chopped the herbage to finer texture, which helps proper packing and compacting. The physical characteristics, temperatures and dry matter values of the silages reported in the current studies are within the acceptable range for a good quality silage (Khota et al. 2018; Dongxia et al. 2019). pH is a major indicator of good silage, when assessing silage quality; generally, the lower the pH, which is the case in our studies (grass silages = 3.93 to 3.98; grass-legume silages = 4.09 to 4.47), the greater the preservation and the more stable the silage (Jusoh et al. 2016). Matlabe et al. (2022) argued that pH values lower than 4.8 could be considered appropriate for good quality silage production. Different research findings ascribed increments of pH values in response to legumes inclusion. Their inclusion at different levels is related to the high buffering capacity of the legumes, primarily due to cation existence (K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+) (Wang et al. 2017) though this was not investigated in our studies. The cations encounter organic acids, formed by the fermentation, neutralizing them and preventing the occurrence of pH drop (da Silva Brito et al. 2020).
Chemical composition of the silages
The increase in ash content in response to legume inclusion could be an indication of high mineral concentration (Kebede et al. 2016). The ash content of the grass silages (Desho = 11.63%; Napier = 12.67%) is comparable with the findings of Zewdu (2005), Nurhayu et al. (2021) and Tesfaye et al. (2019). Concentration of ash in forage varies due to factors such as plant developmental stage, morphological fractions, climatic conditions, soil characteristics and fertilization regime (Zewdu 2007). The decrease in the ash content with 40% inclusion of the legumes might be related to the fermentation process which will require further investigation. However, pattern similar to our findings is reported by Xue et al. (2020) and Nurhayu et al. (2021).
Crude protein content of about 60 to 70 g/kg DM (Smith 1993) is required for maintenance of ruminants and low-quality forages are defined as those with less than 80 g/kg DM CP (Leng 1990). Low quality forages adversely affect rumen microbial activity (Van Soest 1982). Accordingly, the silage prepared from these grasses can serve to cover maintenance requirements of ruminants and will require addition of legumes in the silage for increased milk production. According to EADD (2013), a ration comprising 13 and 15% CP is required for 10 and 15 L of milk yield per day, respectively. Our results revealed that most silages will meet the CP requirement for 10 L of milk while alfalfa and sesbania silages will meet the CP requirement for 15 L of milk production per day, reflecting higher CP in these forage legumes.
Albayrak and Turk (2013) explained that forage legumes are known to have lower fiber content than grasses, while grasses also generally contain more NDF and ADF. As can be expected naturally from grass-legume mixtures, our studies indeed indicated that the increasing forage legumes levels resulted in decreasing NDF and ADF contents. The reduction of the fiber contents may be explained by the hydrolysis of NDF-bound N (Jaakkola et al. 2006) during fermentation. Lower NDF and ADF values imply good-quality silage (Senjaya et al. 2010). The results of these studies complement the works of Xue et al. (2020) and Nurhayu et al. (2021). Generally, grasses tend to increase the fiber fractions, indicated by NDF and ADF, of mixtures owing to the abundant cell wall materials (Buxton and Redfearn 1997). Xue et al. (2020) showed that increasing alfalfa proportion in grass-legume mixture silages decreased NDF, ADF, hemicellulose, and cellulose concentrations, suggesting that forage mixtures improve nutritive values and reduce the need for purchased protein supplements in ruminant rations (Adesogan et al. 2004; Xue et al. 2020). The increase in lignin content of legumes inclusion at different levels is also reported by Xue et al. (2020) and Nurhayu et al. (2021). Lignin is considered as an anti-nutritional component in forage, as it has a negative impact on the nutrient availability of plant fiber (Moore and Jung 2001).
Conclusions
As it was hypothesized, the inclusion of different forage legumes at different levels in a grass-based silage is a good option for making better quality silage, as can be seen from the physical features, and fermentation qualities such as pH, and chemical composition of the experimental silages (increased CP and decreased fiber fractions). Thus, these results are helpful in indicating how better-quality silages can be prepared, which will be more accessible to farmers than the commercial protein supplements that are highly priced and less accessible for farmers in rural areas of developing countries and others.
These results show that the preparation of silages from grass-legume mixtures has a dual advantage: it improves the deficiency of protein in grass silage and it improves the low level of carbohydrates in legumes. Thus, the studies revealed that the use of tree and herbaceous legumes can improve the nutritive quality of grass silages. Depending on the type of livestock to be considered, 20 to 40% levels of inclusion of legumes in grass silages can be considered though the 30 to 40% forage legume inclusion levels appear to offer good feeding for milk production from crossbred cows. It is recommended that feeding experiments with milking cows be undertaken using the suggested levels of inclusion to document evidence in milk response.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during the studies are included in this draft paper; supplementary information can be accessed on a reasonable request from the corresponding author.
References
Adesogan AM, Salawu M, Williams S, Fisher W, Dewhurst R (2004) Reducing concentrate supplementation in dairy cow diets while maintaining milk production with pea-wheat intercrops. J Dairy Sci 87:3398–3406
Albayrak S, Turk M (2013) Changes in the forage yield and quality of legume-grass mixtures throughout a vegetation period. Turk J Agric for 37(2):139–147. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1202-73
AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) (1990) Official methods of analysis, 15th Edition. AOAC Inc., Arlington, Virginia 22201 USA
Assefa G, Mengistu S, Feyesa F and Bediye S (2017) Animal feed resources research in Ethiopia: achievements, challenges and future Directions. In: Dawit A, Eshetu D, Getnet A, Abebe K (eds) Proceedings of the National Conference on Agricultural Research for Ethiopian Renaissance held on January 26–27, 2016, in UNECA, Addis Ababa to mark the 50th Anniversary of the establishment of the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Agricultural Research for Ethiopian Renaissance, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp 273–282
Astewel T, Yihenew GS (2018) Socio-economic analysis of conditions for adoption of tractor hiring services among smallholder farmers, Northwestern Ethiopia. Cogent Food Agric 4(1):1453978. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2018.1453978
Buxton DR, Redfearn DD (1997) Plant limitations to fibre digestion and utilization. J Nutr 127:S814–S818
da Silva Brito GSM, Santos EM, Gherman GLA, Juliana SO, de Anderson MZ, Alexandre FP, Fleming SC, Anne GVOL, Hactus SC (2020) Mixed silages of cactus pear and gliricidia: chemical composition, fermentation characteristics, microbial population and aerobic stability. Sci Rep 10:6834. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63905-9
Dongxia L, Kuikui N, Yingohoa Z, Yanli L, Fuyu Y (2019) Fermentation characteristics, chemical composition, and microbial community of tropical forage silage under different temperatures. Asian-australas J. Anim. Sci 32 (5): 665-674
East Africa Dairy Development (EADD) (2013) Project evaluation-Final Report. Firetail Limited, 3 Dean Trench St, London, SW1P 3HB +44 207 148 0910 http://www.firetail.co.uk Registered in England & Wales 05428065
Effa K, Alemayehu M, Wondatir Z, Hunde D, Assefa, G (2017) Dairy cattle research and development. Demand for Ethiopia. In: Dawit A, Eshetu, D, Getnet A, and Abebe K (eds), Proceedings of the National Conference on Agricultural Research for Ethiopian Renaissance held on January 26–27, 2016, in UNECA, Addis Ababa to mark the 50th Anniversary of the establishment of the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Agricultural Research for Ethiopian Renaissance, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp 213–222
FAO (2018) Ethiopia: Report on feed inventory and feed balance. Food and Agricultural Organization Rome, Italy. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO
FAO (2019) Ethiopia: Availability and utilization of agro-industrial by-products as animal feed. Food and Agricultural organization, Rome. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO
Hanson J, Ellis RH (2020) Progress and challenges in ex situ conservation of forage germplasm: grasses, herbaceous legumes and fodder trees. Plants 9:446
Hawu O, Ravhuhali KE, Mokoboki HK, Lebopa CK, Sipango N (2022) Sustainable use of legume residues: effect on nutritive value and ensiling characteristics of maize straw silage. Sustainability 14:6743. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116743
Jaakkola S, Kaunisto V, Huhtanen P (2006) Volatile fatty acid proportions and microbial protein synthesis in the rumen of cattle receiving grass silage ensiled with different rates of formic acid. Grass Forage Sci 61:282–292
Jusoh S, Alimon AR, Iman MN (2016) Effect of Gliricidia sepium leaves and molasses inclusion on aerobic stability, value and digestibility of Napier grass silage. Malays J Anim Sci 19(1):33–42
Kebede G, Mengistu S, Ew T, Wolde S, Abera M (2016) Chemical composition and in-vitro organic matter digestibility of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schumach) accessions in the mid and highland areas of Ethiopia. Int. J. Livest Res 6(4):41–59. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20160317124016
Khota W, Pholsen S, Higgs D, Cai Y (2018) Comparative analysis of silage fermentation and in vitro digestibility of tropical grass prepared with Acremonium and Tricoderma species producing cellulases. Asian-Australs J Anim Sci 31(12):1913–1922
Leng RA (1990) Factors affecting the utilisation of forages by ruminants under tropical conditions. Nutr Res Rev 3(1):277–303. https://doi.org/10.1079/NRR19900016
Management Entity (2021) Ethiopia’s livestock systems: overview and areas of inquiry. Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Livestock Systems, Gainesville, FL, USA
Matlabe G, Mokoboki HK, Sebola AN, Lebopa CK, Ravhuhali KE, Hawu O (2022) Effects of browse legume species addition on nutritional composition, fermentation characteristics and aerobic stability of Opuntia cladodes silage. S Afr J Sci 118:1–6
Mekonnen K, Bezabih M, Thorne P, Gebreyes MG, Hammond J, Adie A (2022) Feed and forage development in mixed crop–livestock systems of the Ethiopian highlands: Africa RISING project research experience. J Agron 114:46–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20853
Mekonnen G (2015) Characterization of agricultural soils in CASCAPE intervention woredas of Amhara region. CASCAPE report 12. Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia
Moore KJ, Jung HJG (2001) Lignin and fiber digestion. J Range Manag 54:420–430. https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_jrm_v54i4_moore
Muhammad IR, Abdu MI, Iyeghe-Erakpotobor GT, Sulaiman KA (2009) Ensiling quality of gamba fortified with tropical legumes and its preference by rabbits. Res J Appl Sci 4(1):20–25
Negash D (2022) Study on compound animal feed demand and animal products, supply, price and marketing in Ethiopia. Biomed J Sci Technol Res 41:32808–32817
Njarui DMG, Gichangi EM, Gatheru M, Nyambati EM, Ondiko CN, Njunie MN, Ndungu-Magiroi KW, Kiiya WW, Kute CAO, Ayako W (2016) A comparative analysis of livestock farming in smallholder mixed crop-livestock systems in Kenya: 2. Feed utilization, availability and mitigation strategies to feed scarcity. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 28, Article #67. Retrieved November 6, 2022, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd28/4/njar28067.html
Nurhayu AZ, Saenab A, Ella A, Ishak ABL, Qomariyah N (2021) The effects of elephant grass silage combined with indigofera species on the performance of bali cattle. JAPH 9(3):229–235. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.jahp/2021/9.3.229.235
Ofori AD, Nartey MA (2018) Nutritive value of Napier grass ensiled using molasses as an additive. Int J Eng Sci 7(9):45–50
Ososanya TO, Olorunnisomo OA (2015) Silage characteristics and preference of sheep for wet brewer's grain ensiled with maize cob. Livestock Research for Rural Development 27, Article # 12. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd27/1/osos27012.htm
Paul BK, Koge J, Maass BL, An N, Peters M, Groot CJ, Tittonell P (2020) Tropical forage technologies can deliver multiple benefits in Sub-Saharan Africa. A meta-analysis. Agron Sustain Dev 40:22
Sattari SZ, Bouwman AF, Martinez RR, Beusen AHW, Van Ittersum MK (2016) Negative global phosphorus budgets challenge sustainable intensification of grasslands. Nat Commun 7:10696
Senjaya OT, Dhalika T, Budiman A, Hernaman IM (2010) Effect of storage time and additivies in silage making on neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber of Naiper grass silage. J Ilmu Ternak. 10(2):85–89. https://doi.org/10.24198/jit.v10i2.425
Shapiro BI, Gebru G, Desta S, Negassa A, Nigussie K, Aboset G and Mechal H (2015) Ethiopia livestock master plan. ILRI Project Report. International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya
Tesfaye T, Asmare B, Mekuriaw Y, Hunegnaw B (2019) Morphological characters, yield, and chemical composition potentials of Desho Grass (Pennisetum glaucifolium H.) intercropped with vetch species in the highlands of Ethiopia. Hindawi Adv Agric. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7874717
van der Lee J (2020) Understanding dairy commercialization: Evolving market linkages, transition, and resilience of dairy farming in the East African Highlands, PhD Thesis. Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, ISBN 978-94-6395-512-6
Van Soest PJ (1982) Nutritional ecology of ruminants. O and B Books, Corvallis
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB (1985) Analysis of forages and fibrous feeds. A laboratory manual for animal science 613. Cornell University, Ithaca
Wang S, Yuan X, Dong Z, Li J, Shao T (2017) Effect of ensiling corn stover with legume herbages in different proportions on fermentation characteristics, nutritive quality and in vitro digestibility on the Tibetan Plateau. Grassl Sci 63:236–244
Xue Z, Wang Y, Yang H, Li S, Zhang Y (2020) Silage fermentation and in vitro degradation characteristics of orchardgrass and alfalfa intercrop mixtures as influenced by forage ratios and nitrogen fertilizing levels. Sustain J 12:871
Zewdu T (2005) Variation in growth, yield, chemical composition and invitro dry matter digestibility of Napier grass accessions (Pennisetum purpureum). Trop Sci 45:67–73
Zewdu T (2007) Improved pasture production in Ethiopia. Haramaya University, Ethiopia, ISBN: 978-99944-810-2-6.
Acknowledgements
The authors highly appreciate farmers for their involvement in the research and development agents and experts for their facilitation. We appreciate SNV regional managers (Sileshi Marga and Bizuayehu Alemneh) for their facilitation of the studies.
Funding
The research was undertaken with the financial support of the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia through the BRIGE project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AE, AAA, JVdL designing experimental plan; AE data analysis and draft writeup; AAA, JVdL manipulating and reading the manuscript; AE, FN, HA and HD implementation of the experiment and data collection; LB reading the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests of any kind.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ebro, A., Aranguiz, A.A., Nemera, F. et al. Inclusion levels of tree and herbaceous legumes on nutritive quality of grass silage: results from on-farm trials. Agroforest Syst 98, 103–113 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00893-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00893-5