Abstract
Clove farming developed on the east coast of Madagascar a little over a century ago. The species is largely cultivated and farmed by communities of smallholders. This study aims to characterize clove based cropping systems. There are three types of coexisting clove systems: monoculture where clove is the sole crop with inter-rows covered by wild grasses, agricultural parklands where clove is associated with annual crops (rain fed rice, sugar cane, cassava) and finally complex agroforestry systems where clove is associated with other crops (vanilla), fruit trees (lychees, breadfruit, jackfruit) and pepper vines, as well as some forest trees. The study also shows that the majority of existing clove trees in the various cropping systems are over 50–60 years old. Our study aims to characterise the different clove based cropping systems with the intention of establishing a typology by measuring biometric criteria associated with clove trees, by determining the accompanying species and by characterising the horizontal and vertical structuration of plots. From these observations, we suggest some evolutionary hypotheses of clove systems in an attempt to resituate this typology in a historical dynamic implicating the agricultural history of the east coast of Madagascar and the evolution of the smallholders’ strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Agroforestry can be fairly consensually defined as the deliberate cultivation of perennial woody plants in ecological or economic interaction with seasonal of livestock crops, simultaneously or in time sequence (Nair 1985; Sinclair 1999; Torquebiau 2000). Agroforestry systems (AFS) preserve a high level of biodiversity, which promotes productivity, diversification of production (cash crops, food crops, green fodder, mulch, medicine, firewood, timber,…) thus promoting food security, resilience and economic insurance (Thrupp 2000; Rahman et al. 2017). But beyond the production function, agroforestry produces many eco-systemic services (soil fertility, water cycle, carbon sequestration) that are particularly important in a context of climate change (Mbow et al. 2014; Palacios Bucheli and Bokelmann 2017). As a result, the structure and use of agroforests is determined by a set of determinants such as ecological context, farmer’s strategy, economic context, and also political context that may vary in space and time.
Today, in the east coast of Madagascar, the landscape is heavily marked by clove farming. But a summary analysis of the landscape shows that it is a diverse composite, a continuum of more or less complex AFS in which the clove tree is implicated (Michels et al. 2011). Clove trees are sometimes present in the almost mono-specific plantations right up to the relatively complex compounds where they accompany herbaceous and ligneous wild or cultivated species.
In the current context where several international funders (World Bank, European Union) intend to support Malagasy clove chains through sustainable development, it is helpful to better understand the strategies of the clove producers, as well as the structure and evolution of their systems of production.
Our study aims to characterise the different clove based cropping systems with the intention of establishing a typology by measuring biometric criteria associated with clove trees, by determining the accompanying species and by characterising the horizontal and vertical structuration of plots.
The second objective is to place the cropping systems in a historical dynamic. Based on the fact that clove trees are long-living—able to live for upwards of 80 years, and as much as a century (Ledreux 1932b; Leroy 1946)—and considering the short history of the clove tree in Madagascar (Danthu et al. 2014; Cocoual and Danthu 2018), it can be estimated that the cloves living today have probably conserved traces of the evolution of means of cultivation and the smallholders’ strategies since the beginning of the development of this crop in Madagascar.
The following hypotheses were studied: (1) various cropping systems coexist to accommodate cloves; (2) the current typology of these clove AFSs is a product of the region’s agricultural history, combined with the strategies of the successive occupants of the land.
Context
The clove in Madagascar
The clove tree (Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merrill & Perry), from the Myrtaceae family, which originated in the Maluku Islands, was introduced to Madagascar around two centuries ago; firstly to Sainte-Marie Island then to the east coast of Madagascar (Boiteau 1936; Decary 1937; Dussel 1962) (Fig. 1).
Before 1900, the clove was cultivated only on Sainte Marie Island (Prudhomme 1901). The development of its culture on the “Great Island” began at the beginning of the twentieth century. Its value is derived from two products: the clove, the culinary spice and the ingredient of kreteks (Indonesian cigarette) (Parle and Khanna 2011; Arnez 2009) and the essential oil rich in eugenol (Razafimamonjison et al. 2014, 2016), basic ingredient of a variety of applications in the food industry, perfumery, medicine and aromatherapy (Lampman et al. 1977; Leela and Sapna 2008; Kamatou et al. 2012).
Despite its vulnerability to cyclones (Ledreux 1928, 1932b), frequently occurring on the east coast of Madagascar (Donque 1975), and various pests (mainly fungal diseases) (Heim and Bouriquet 1939; Bouriquet 1946), in particular the clove tree miner, andretra (lepidoptera Chrysotypus mabilianum Viette) (Frappa 1954; Dubois and Ranaivosoa 1966), cultivation of the clove trees developed gradually from the beginning of the twentieth century (Ledreux 1928, 1932b; François 1936; Leroy 1946). This development began as large colonial controlled plantations, as well as small plots belonging to native farmers (Isnard 1951; Cocoual and Danthu 2018).
Clove trees are currently grown and farmed all along the east coast of Madagascar from Fort-Dauphin in the South to Sambava in the North (Dufournet 1968), but are concentrated in the Analanjirofo region, particularly in the areas of low altitude of the districts of Vavatenina, Fenerive-Est, Soanierana Ivongo, Mananara-Nord, Maroantsetra (Fig. 1) (Danthu et al. 2014). Madagascar is the second largest world producer of cloves after Indonesia and the largest exporter of cloves and clove essential oil. These products are currently the top Malagasy agricultural exports, with vanilla and lychees (Danthu et al. 2014; Gouzien et al. 2016).
In the Analanjirofo region, the main crops are rice, sweet potato, cassava, vanilla, coffee, sugar cane, lychees and peppercorns, as well as cloves (Dandoy 1973; Jahiel et al. 2014). Rice growing occupies the lowlands and tavy (slash and burn) is commonly practiced on the higher ground in hilly areas (Rqibate et al. 2014).
The first agronomic practices
We based our reconstitution on the earliest technical and scientific documents from the colonial period: Ledreux (1928, 1932b), François (1936), Boiteau (1936), Leroy (1946), Isnard (1951), Maistre (1955), which provide documentary evidence of a real interest by the French colonial powers in the development of cloves in Madagascar (Cocoual and Danthu 2018). They revealed that initially two main farming models coexisted in the zone. The first model was clove-based and of low density (200/250 trees ha−1), with the trees mainly planted in rows, making up plantations often owned by settlers (Fig. 2). The second model, comprising of smaller plantations owned by native peasants, presented more varied and more densely planted cropping systems (Fig. 3). Isnard (1951) has estimated that these latter plantations represented around two-thirds of the surface area of the zone’s clove tree stock.
The agricultural technicians at the time, in fact, recommended low densities for planting clove trees in plantations: 300 even 100 trees/ha. These recommendations were adhered to in the settlers’ plantations, but according to Maistre (1955, 1964), the native small holders planted at much higher densities of around 500 and up to 600 trees/ha, probably in anticipation of large numbers of young tree losses resulting from passing cyclones and/or devastation by pests such as andretra, in a context of low maintenance of plantations. The author reported, indeed, that the clove trees were often neglected, with only an annual clearing around the foot of the trees, as the clove were considered more as produce for picking (Tourneur 1947; Maistre 1955).
Clove trees were also dispersed throughout the savoka (local regrowth of vegetation which develops after slash and burn as secondary forest), sometimes to the extent of occupying all the available ground, to the detriment of food crops (Tourneur 1947).
The end of colonial rule brought in the demise of the big plantations, especially on the east coast which had been largely decolonised (Koerner 1969; Cocoual and Danthu 2018). These estates, which were often divided into smaller parcels, continued to be farmed by a plethora of more or less legal beneficiaries, with a more or less invested interest, who exploited the clove trees without concern for the plant’s conservation. Clove tree densities gradually diminished as the trees aged and the consequences of climate, biological constraints and repeated pruning bore their effects. This brought about the dynamics described by Penot et al. (2016), where such evolution culminating in the disappearance of clove from the landscape has been observed in Sainte Marie Island, the cradle of clove culture in Madagascar.
Materials and methods
Survey apparatus
The study was made on 42 AFS including clove plots in the districts of Fenerive-Est (or Fénérive-Est, south part of the Analanjorofo region): fokontany of Lohariana (rural district of Ambatoharanana) (plots L1–L19) and Andapa II (rural district of Ambodimanga II) (plots A1–A23) (Fig. 1). These plots were chosen on the basis of a “reasonable choice” aiming to represent the whole range of ecological contexts where clove trees are grown.
In each plot, a sub-plot of 900 m2 (30 m × 30 m) was marked out, as homogeneous and representative of the plot as possible. Measurements were carried out within this sub-plot. We gathered information on tree density and age of the clove trees in each sub-plot and on the flora composition and spatial arrangement associated to clove trees.
Three sets of variables were collected and developed: (1) one set relating to the clove trees, (2) a second set relating to the species of vegetables cultivated in association with clove trees (herbaceous; rice, sugar cane, vanilla, or ligneous; fruit trees for personal consumption or sale; breadfruit, lychee, jackfruit, mango, coffee…), and (3) a third set relating to wild native species that the farmers have conserved, preserved, even encouraged in their cropping systems for various uses, principally herbaceous, which might have value as forage and ligneous forest species suitable for fire wood, or other purposes (Table 1).
Floral composition of plots
The botanical characterisation was performed using the Braun-Blanquet (1965) recording method per plot of 30 m × 30 m, subdivided into nine mini-plots of 10 m × 10 m with botanical inventories (herbaceous, bushes, shrubs, trees…) and identity of the plant (common name and scientific name). These were derived from herbarium samples and comparison with the reference specimens in the TAN (Parc Botanique et Zoologique de Tsimbazaza) and TEF (Département des Recherches Forestières et Piscicoles of FOFIFA, Centre National de Recherche Appliquée au Développement Rural), national herbaria of Madagascar in Antananarivo, or by consulting the database of the Missouri Botanical Garden (TROPICOS 2016).
The characterisation of the vertical structure of the planting system was performed according to the method described by Nusbaumer et al. (2005). It consists in moving a 8 m long graduated pole within the vegetation, along a 30 m transect in the middle of the plot following two orthogonal axes. A reading was taken at a point every metre: the heights of the points of contact between the vegetation and the pole as well as the name of the species concerned were noted. Beyond 8 m, the height of the points of contact was estimated visually.
The following scale was used to estimate the rate of herbaceous cover (cultivated and wild): 0 when the surface of the plot was clear, 1 point when the cover was estimated at 20% and 5 if the entire surface was covered in herbaceous vegetation.
Determination of the age of the clove trees
The age of the clove trees was assessed by questioning the owners on the history of their plot. The validity of this information was checked by counting the number of rings on four recently fallen or felled clove trees from which slices of trunk were sampled, dried then polished on one side with sanding discs of different grains (50, 100, 120, 220, 320 and 400). The rings were counted from four perpendicular radii and the mean age established (Worbes 1995, 2002; Detienne et al. 1998). Table 2 shows a good correspondence with the age stated by the local farmer, corroborating this source of information.
Although based on a very small number of samples, we considered that the information collected was sufficiently reliable to assess the age of the trees. Therefore, a complete tree-age analysis based on a larger sampling, taking into account the position of the tree in the landscape, would be interesting to complete that point.
Statistical treatment and data analysis
Two principal components analyses (PCA) were performed using the XLSTAT 2015 programme to determine the distribution of the 42 plots. The first PCA (Fig. 4) was carried out to eliminate the redundant variables focusing on the circle of correlation taking into account the value of the angle α formed by two vectors and the length of the vector of each variable. The variables are redundant if α < 90° and the longer the vector the greater the variable. This elimination was performed within the three sets of variables: those related to the clove trees, those related to the associated cultivated species and those related to the associated wild species. The second PCA was performed to study the influence of the five variables retained (NCT, CCH, NICL, CWH, NIWL) on the distribution of the plots (Table 1; Fig. 5).
In the tables the means are given ± the standard deviation.
Results
Typology of the different clove cropping systems
The PCA factorial plan (Fig. 5) shows that the axes 1 and 2 explain 67.81% of the total variability (42.14% for Axis 1 and 25.67% for Axis 2). The NCT (density of the clove tree plots), CCH (coverage rate of cultivated herbaceous vegetation) and CWH (coverage rate of wild herbaceous vegetation) variables contribute to a great extent on axis 1 (21.58, 37.36 and 38.87%, respectively) whilst NICL (density of cultivated ligneous plants) and NIWL (density in wild ligneous species) contribute to axis 2 for 39.38 and 50.33%, respectively.
The points representing the 42 plots are distributed into three groups.
Group 1 (G1) is characterised by a large number of clove trees (NCT) and a high coverage rate of wild herbaceous plants (CWH) (Fig. 5). These plots have a density of clove trees estimated at 239 plants per hectare representing a basal area of 14.8 m2 ha−1 (BACT) and crowns that occupy around a third of the plot’s surface (AOCCT, Table 3), the height of which rarely exceeds six metres (Figs. 6a, b, 7). This group of plots is also characterised by the presence of many species of wild herbaceous plants (NSWH) belonging to the Poaceae and Asteraceae families (Table 4), with a ground coverage rate exceeding 85% (CWH), a few scattered Ravenala madagascariensis and no cultivated herbaceous species (NSCH). The coverage rate of the intermediary strata is low (2 to 4 m) consisting mainly of clove trees and small numbers of trees and bushes, occasionally in greater numbers (NIWL), which are often spontaneous: guava, cattley guavas, Harungana madagascariensis, coffee (Fig. 7).
Group 2 (G2) consists of plots characterised by the presence of cultivated herbaceous species (CCH, Fig. 5) with a relatively low density of clove trees. These plots contain significantly fewer clove trees than those in Group 1 (average density of 158 ha−1 compared with 239 ha−1) but for a cumulative surface of crowns equivalent to around 3000 m2 ha−1 (NCT, AOCCT, Table 3, Fig. 6d). The average number of associated cultivated species is 1.6 (NSCH), with a coverage rate of 60–90% (CCH, Table 3). These are often tall herbaceous species (cassava, corn, sugar cane or banana…) and rain fed rice (Table 4, Fig. 8). Other accompanying ligneous species were observed but these were not usually much taller than the clove trees (Fig. 6c), and were usually fruit trees: coffee trees, jackfruits, litchis, soursops, and a few rambutans. There were also a few rare young clove trees aged around 10 years and newly planted plots.
Group 3 (G3) is characterised by a large number of accompanying cultivated (NICL) and wild (NIWL) ligneous species (Fig. 5): on average 10 species per ha [NSCL, NSWL, Table 3)]. The ligneous strata is dense, with a coverage rate of 40–60% (AOCCT, AOCCL, AOCWL, Table 3, Fig. 6e, f) and the clove trees make up around half the ligneous species present (NTC vs. NICL + NIWL) but are not the dominant species. The upper strata is taken up by forest species, particularly cultivated ones (fruit trees) up to around 6 m tall (Fig. 6e, f). The emergent ones are Artocarpus heterophyllus, Litchi chinensis and a few rare ligneous forest species with a coverage rate of 25–30% (Fig. 9). The strata ranging from 4 to 8 m is characterised by fruit trees such as Citrus reticulata and Annona muricata, Annona reticulata, Annona squamosa with a coverage rate of around 50%. The intermediate stratum (2–4 m) is made of ligneous forest species such as young Harungana madagascariensis, a pioneer species, and a few sparse juvenile species characteristic of the Malagasy coastal forests such as Intsia bijuga (Table 4). These forest species represent only a few plants for a basal area of less than 1 m2 ha−1 (BAWL). Jatropha thouarsii, as well as coffee and banana trees also occupy this stratum, with a coverage rate of around 50% (Fig. 6f). Finally, the lower strata (< 2 m) is characterised by wild herbaceous plants such as Stenotaphrum dimidiatum, Cynodon sp., Ageratum conizoïdes, Clidemia hirta, as well as vanilla and a few pepper lianas, which use the trees as climbing supports.
Age of clove trees
The clove trees generally have a diameter at breast height (DBH) between 20 and 35 cm (DBHCT, Table 3). Relative to the estimations in Table 2 (as stated by owners on a limited number of trees and ring counting), this diameter corresponds to an approximate age of the trees at between 50 and 75 years.).
Discussion
Three distinct types of clove based cropping systems
The quantitative and qualitative information compiled has enabled the identification of three cropping systems of increasing complexity.
The simplest system (G1), a monoculture of clove trees farmed without any accompanying cultivated species is mainly productive: production of clove and/or clove essential oil derived from the distillation of leaves and branches collected from pruning. These parcels of land are sometimes used for grazing zebu cattle (free-ranging or tethered) as indicated by Petit (1967), which is in fact “under-tree grazing” according to the definition of Torquebiau et al. (2002), but generally this system assimilates more with the system described by Nair (1985) as “agro-sylvo-pastoral systems with a commercial production function” or “Plantation tree crops” by Sinclair (1999). Michels et al. (2011) consider these parcels of clove trees characterised by the absence of weeding as a “monoculture orchard with minimized work”.
The second cropping system identified associating cloves trees, trees and cultivated species (G2), corresponds to “parkland” of Torquebiau (2000) and Torquebiau et al. (2002). According to Michels et al. (2011), this system is a “simple AFS”. Whereas Nair (1985) describes it as “agro-silviculture the purpose of which is to provide commercial production combined with subsistence production”. But contrary to other parkland systems such as those of Faidherbia albida, Vitellaria paradoxa (shea) or Parkia biglobosa (locust bean) in Sahelian Africa (Vandenbelt 1990; Bernard et al. 1995; Wala et al. 2005), the main ligneous species (clove, in this instance) has been introduced and is non-native.
The third cropping system is more complex. The clove trees are associated with herbaceous and ligneous species, often cultivated, and less frequently forest species (G3). It corresponds to the definition of forest-gardens given by Torquebiau (2000). According to Nair (1985), it is an “agro-sylvicultural productive system the purpose of which is to provide a combined commercial and subsistence production”, whereas for Michels et al. (2011), it is a complex AFS. The majority of species found there are fruiting. Forest species, represented by individuals often small sized juveniles, are generally characteristic of recent secondary formations or disturbed habitats, such as Harungana madagascariensis, Albizia sp. and Desmodium sp., whilst only the few Intsia bijuga observed in these parcels are indicative of undisturbed coastal forests (Table 3) (Thiel 1975; Du Puy et al. 2002; TROPICOS 2016). The low forest component differentiates this system from the “garden-forests” defined by Wiersum (2004).
Old stocks of clove trees
The surveyed plantations were probably established, for the most part, between the colonial period from 1940s to 1960s or 1970s, even though some recent plantations are observed. This can be generalised to the majority of the zone’s clove trees. After this date, and despite the actions of major programmes to support the clove tree plantations (Maillot 2014; Leydet 2015), relatively few new plantations seem to have been undertaken and observed in the field.
Historical perspective of the evolution of clove based cropping systems
Today, clove trees, mostly planted during the colonial period and up to the 1970s, are present in three different AFS: monoculture, tree parks and complex agroforestry systems, with a wide variation in density. These three cropping system patterns are therefore an evolution of the systems put in place in the first half of the twentieth century (Danthu et al. 2014; Cocoual and Danthu 2018).
Presently, the plots managed in monoculture have a clove density of around 250 plants/ha corresponding incidentally to that recommended previously by the agricultural technicians of the colonial era (Ledreux 1928, 1932b; François 1936; Boiteau 1936; Leroy 1946) aimed at the colonial plantations. These plots, as observed in our previous 2010/2016 surveys in Sainte Marie areas (Penot et al. 2016), originate either from the minimally-degraded, old colonial plantations or from the native farmers plots, initially densely planted, which have thinned out over time without the owner having taken any action to restock or replace the missing plants. These plots are almost exclusively valorised by products derived from the clove trees (essence and cloves).
At the present time, the parks with low density plantings of clove trees (around 150 plants/ha) are probably from former dense plantations established during the colonial period, which have suffered a strong clove tree density erosion. Current farmers have therefore developed a strategy of diversification and value both the original crop, the clove, as well as the accompanying annual and perennial crops, essentially food stuffs, using more or less long fallow periods in extensive pasture.
Complex AFS sheltering clove are never described in the former publications. They are not explicitly referred by Ledreux (1928), François (1936), Isnard (1951) or Maistre (1964). These authors understood the clove tree only in pure and aligned plantations. They did not consider small local planters’ plots, even if they represented, according to Isnard (1951), approximatively two-thirds of surfaces planted in clove trees. The origin of these current complex AFS is probably mixed plantations (agroforests, home gardens, forest-gardens) established by these first Malagasy farmers, systems considered by colonial technicians to be of no value. They may also have derived from the same origin as the parklands: a former plantation with a declining clove tree density that the farmer will have complemented with fruit trees.
Our study, completing the works of Michels et al. (2011), Danthu et al. (2014) and Cocoual and Danthu (2018), proposes a final typology of clove based cropping systems in Fenerive-Est District. We identify and describe three systems: monoculture, parkland and complex SAF. We situate this typology using a historical perspective, combining the directives of the colonial powers with the perceptions and strategies of the local farmers.
This knowledge sheds some light on current issues concerning cloves in Madagascar including the urgency to renew current ageing plantations as stated by Leydet (2015), trade-offs between the production of cloves and essential oil [clearly demonstrated by Fourcin et al. (2015)] and competition between cash crops and food crops aimed at safeguarding food security (Mariel et al. 2016).
Combined with the works of Cocoual and Danthu (2018), Penot et al. (2016, 2017), Gestin (2016) on Sainte Marie, Fenerive-Est, Mananara, our work also highlights that the issues relating to cloves in Madagascar vary according to time and space and must be approached with consideration to the diversity of the local contexts, each of which presents their own specific past and present features. Clove has definitely left its mark on the landscape.
References
Arnez M (2009) Tobacco and kretek: Indonesian drugs in historical change. Aust J South East Asian Stud 2:49–69
Bernard C, Oualbadet M, Ouattara N, Peltier R (1995) Parc agroforestiers dans un terroir soudanien—Cas du village de Dolékaha au Nord de la côte d’Ivoire. Bois For Trop 244:25–42
Boiteau G (1936) Le girofle. La revue de Madagascar 13:107–116
Bouriquet G (1946) Les maladies du giroflier. In: Paul Lechevalier et Fils (ed) Les maladies des plantes cultivées à Madagascar. Encyclopédie mycologique, Paris, pp 237–252
Braun-Blanquet J (1965) Plant sociology: the study of plant communities. Hafner, London
Cocoual M, Danthu P (2018) Le giroflier à Madagascar: essai d’histoire et de géographie coloniales, 1896–1958. Rev Géogr Hist 12. http://rgh.univ-lorraine.fr/articles/view/96/. Accessed 3 June 2018
Dandoy G (1973) Terroirs et économies villageoises de la région de Vavatenina (Côte orientale malgache). ORSTOM, Paris
Danthu P, Penot E, Ranoarisoa KM, Rakotondravelo JC, Michel I, Tiollier M, Michels T, Normand F, Razafimamonjison G, Fawbush F, Jahiel M (2014) The clove tree of Madagascar: a success story with an unpredictable future. Bois For Trop 320:83–96
Decary R (1937) Les débuts de la colonisation agricole à l’Ile Sainte-Marie de Madagascar. Rev Bot Appl Agric Colon 17:610–618
Detienne P, Oyono F, Durrieu de Madron L, Demarquez B, Nasi R (1998) L’analyse de cernes: applications aux études de croissance de quelques essences en peuplements naturels de forêt dense africaine. Série FORAFRI, Document 15, CIRAD-Forêt, Montpellier
Donque G (1975) Les cyclones tropicaux des mars malgaches—Mise au point. Madag Rev Géogr 27:9–63
Du Puy DJ, Labat JN, Rabevohitra R, Villiers JF, Bosser J, Moat J (2002) The Leguminosae of Madagascar. Royal Botanic Garden, Kew
Dubois J, Ranaivosoa H (1966) Chrysotypus mabilianum Viette chenille mineuse du giroflier (Andretra)—biologie et lutte mécanique. L’Agronomie Trop 21:823–836
Dufournet R (1968) Le giroflier et sa culture à Madagascar. Bull Madag 262:216–279
Dussel L (1962) Produits de Madagascar—Girofle. Bull Madag 191:325–338
Fourcin C, Penot E, Miche I, Danthu P, Jahiel M (2015) Contribution du giroflier à la sécurité alimentaire des ménages agricoles dans la région de Fénérive-Est, Madagascar. Project AFSFOOD, Working Paper no. 14. http://agritrop.cirad.fr/576559/1/ID576559.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2017
François E (1936) Giroflier et girofle. Rev Bot Appl Agr Colon 16:589–608 and 892–907
Frappa C (1954) Sur la chenille de Thyrididæ du genre Chrysotypus nuisible au giroflier sur la côte est de Madagascar. Bull Madag 95:280–287
Gestin C (2016) Analyse de la dynamique giroflière dans la Réserve de Biosphère de Mananara-Nord, Madagascar. Mémoire d’Ingénieur Agronome, Développement Agricole et rural au Sud (DARS), SupAgro/LaSalle, Montpellier, 131 p
Gouzien Q, Penot E, Jahiel M, Danthu P (2016) Le girofle: poids dans l’économie malgache et place de Madagascar dans le marché mondial. Project AFS4FOOD, Working Paper no. 18. http://agritrop.cirad.fr/582468/. Accessed 21 Nov 2017
Heim R, Bouriquet G (1939) Maladies et champignons du giroflier à Madagascar. Revue de Pathologie Végétale et d’Entomologie Agricole de France 26:5–38
Isnard H (1951) La colonisation agricole à Madagascar. Rev Géogr Alp 39:97–125
Jahiel M, Andréas C, Penot E (2014) Experience from fifteen years of Malagasy lychee export campaigns. Fruits 69:1–19
Kamatou GP, Vermaak I, Viljoen AM (2012) Eugenol- from the remote Malaku Islands to the international market place: a review of a remarkable and versatile molecule. Molecules 17:6953–6981
Koerner F (1969) Décolonisation et économie de plantations. Situation des propriétés européennes à Madagascar. Ann Géogr 78:654–679
Lampman GM, Andrews J, Bratz W, Hanssen O, Kelley K, Perry D, Ridgeway A (1977) The preparation of vanillin from eugenol and sawdust. J Chem Educ 54:776–778
Ledreux A (1928) Le giroflier dans les régions de Fénérive, Soanierana et Sainte-Marie. Bull Écon Madag 1:38–45
Ledreux A (1932a) Le cannelier à Madagascar. La Parfumerie Moderne 4:179–187
Ledreux A (1932b) Le giroflier à Sainte-Marie et Madagascar. Bulletin Mensuel de l’Institut National d’Agronomie Coloniale 175/176: 1–22 + appendices
Leela NK, Sapna VP (2008) Clove. In: Parthasarathy VA, Chempakam B, Zachariah TJ (eds) Chemistry of spices. CABI International, Wallingford, pp 146–164
Leroy JF (1946) Le Giroflier el les Plantes à Parfums. Rev Int Bot Appl Agric Trop 26:425–429
Leydet C (2015) Evaluation de la dynamique de plantation/replantation en girofliers par les petits producteurs malgaches. Mémoire d’Ingénieur Agronome, Système Agricole, Alimentation et Développement au Sud CIRAD/FIDA/IRC, Montpellier, 75 p
Maillot E (2014) Impacts et durabilité des actions mises en œuvre dans le cadre des PPRR (Programme de Promotion des Revenus Ruraux) et CTHT/STABEX (Programme d’Appui aux Filières d’Exportation Agricoles): cas de la production du girofle dans le district de Fénérive-Est à Madagascar. Mémoire de Master 2, SupAgro, Montpellier, 77 p
Maistre J (1955) Le giroflier à Madagascar et Zanzibar. Agron Trop 10:413–448
Maistre J (1964) Le clou de girofle. In: Les plantes à épices. G.-P. Maisonneuve & Larose, Paris, pp 77–124
Mariel J, Penot E, Michel I, Danthu P (2016) Analyse des systèmes agroforestiers du territoire de Vavatenina à Madagascar. Stratégies de mise en valeur, perceptions paysannes et résilience. Journées de Recherches en Science Sociales, Paris, December 2016. https://agritrop.cirad.fr/582463/1/. Accessed 22 Nov 2017
Mbow C, van Noordwijk M, Luedeling E, Neufeldt H, Minang PA, Kowero G (2014) Agroforestry solutions to address food security and climate change challenges in Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:61–67
Michels T, Bisson A, Ralaidovy V, Rabemananjar H, Jahiel M, Malézieux E (2011) Horticultural agroforestry systems in the humid tropics: analysis of clove tree-based systems in Madagascar. Acta Hortic 894:161–167
Nair PKR (1985) Classification of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 3:97–128
Nusbaumer L, Gautier L, Chatelain C, Spichiger R (2005) Structure et composition floristique de la forêt classée du Scio (Côte d’Ivoire)—Etude descriptive et comparative. Candollea 60:393–443
Palacios Bucheli VJ, Bokelmann W (2017) Agroforestry systems for biodiversity and ecosystem services: the case of the Sibundoy Valley in the Colombian province of Putumayo. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 13:380–387
Parle M, Khanna D (2011) Clove: a champion spice. Int J Res Ayurveda Pharm 2:47–54
Penot E, Richard A, Danthu P (2016) Analyse des systèmes de production à base de girofliers à l’ile Sainte Marie, Madagascar. In: Penot E (ed) Processus d’innovation et résilience des exploitations agricoles à Madagascar. Editions L’Harmattan, Paris, pp 385–403
Penot E, Fourcin C, Michel I, Jahiel M, Danthu P (2017) Systèmes à base de giroflier, stratégies paysannes et sécurité alimentaire. Le cas de la région de Fénérive-Est. In: Proceedings of «XXIIIème Journées du développement: Agricultures, ruralités et développement». Université libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles
Petit M (1967) La plaine littorale de Maroantsetra, étude géographique. Institut de Géographie de la Faculté des Lettres, Université de Tananarive, Tananarive
Prudhomme E (1901) L’agriculture sur la Côte Est de Madagascar. Comité de Madagascar, Paris, 119 p (+photos)
Rahman SA, Jacobsen JB, Healey JR, Roshetko JM, Sunderland T (2017) Finding alternatives to swidden agriculture; does agroforestry improve livelihood options and reduce pressure on existing forest? Agrofor Syst 91:185–199
Razafimamonjison G, Jahiel M, Duclos T, Ramanoelina P, Fawbush F, Danthu P (2014) Bud, leaf and stem essential oil composition of Syzygium aromaticum from Madagascar, Indonesia and Zanzibar. Int J Basic App Chem Sci 3:224–233
Razafimamonjison G, Boulanger R, Jahiel M, Ramanoelina P, Fawbush F, Lebrun M, Danthu P (2016) Variations in yield and composition of leaf essential oil from Syzygium aromaticum at various phases of development. Int J Basic Appl Chem Sci 5:90–94
Rqibate A, Plugge D, Rabefahiry T, Ramamonjisoa B, Köhl M (2014) Local livelihoods in the context of deforestation and forest degradation: a study of three regions in Madagascar. In: Kalita P, Galloway G, de Jong W, Pacheco P, Mery G (eds) Forests under pressure: local responses to global issues. IUFRO world series 32, Vienna, pp 329–343
Sinclair FL (1999) A general classification of agroforestry practice. Agrofor Syst 46:161–180
Thiel J (1975) Bois et essences malgaches (troisième supplément). Centre National de la Recherche Appliquée au Développement Rural, Tananarive
Thrupp LA (2000) Linking agricultural biodiversity and food security: the valuable role of agrobiodiversity for sustainable agriculture. Int Aff 76:265–281
Torquebiau E (2000) A renewed perspective on agroforestry concepts and classification. C R Acad Sci Paris, Sci Vie Life Sci 323:1009–1101
Torquebiau E, Mary F, Sibelet N (2002) Les associations agroforestières et leurs multiples enjeux. Bois For Trop 271:23–35
Tourneur M (1947) Epices et aromates. Madagascar. Encyclopédie de l’Empire français, Paris, pp 310–321
TROPICOS (Missouri Botanical Garden) (2016) Catalogue of the vascular plants of Madagascar. http://www.tropicos.org/Project/MADA. Accessed 29 Feb 2016, 13 Mar 2016 and 22 Apr 2016
Vandenbelt RJ (1990) Agroforestry in the semiarid tropics. In: MacDicken KG, Vergara NT (eds) Agroforestry classification and management. Wiley, New York, pp 150–194
Wala K, Sinsin K, Guelly KA, Kokou K, Akpagana K (2005) Typologie et structure des parcs agroforestiers dans la préfecture de Doufelgou (Togo). Sécheresse 16:209–216
Wiersum KF (2004) Forest gardens as an ‘intermediate’ land-use system in the nature-Culture continuum: characteristics and future potential. Agrofor Syst 61:123–134
Worbes M (1995) How to measure growth dynamics in tropical trees—a review. IAWA J 6:337–351
Worbes M (2002) One hundred years of tree-ring research in the tropics—a brief history and an outlook to future challenges. Dendrochronologia 20:217–231
Acknowledgements
This study was performed as part of the AFS4FOOD Project (Agroforestry for Food Security) funded by the European Union and the African Union (Grant Number AURG/031/2012). It was conducted in partnership between CIRAD, CTHT and ESSA. It has received funds from the FSP PARRUR Project by the French Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs. The authors wish to thank the residents of the rural communities of Ambatoharanana and Ambodimanga II for their hospitality and assistance. Thanks also to Karen Newby, who translated this article in aid of the association “Words for Solidarity”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arimalala, N., Penot, E., Michels, T. et al. Clove based cropping systems on the east coast of Madagascar: how history leaves its mark on the landscape. Agroforest Syst 93, 1577–1592 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0268-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0268-9