Abstract
In Europe, the recently reported plant pathogen Xylella fastidiosa subsp. multiplex affects several wild, ornamental, and cultivated trees causing scorch diseases. In 2018, the sequence type 87 was reported in Tuscany on Mediterranean shrubs and trees. Although spittlebugs (Hemiptera: Aphrophoridae) were already identified as main vectors of this bacterium in Europe, their role in the transmission of this subspecies has not been ascertained yet. In this study the ability of Philaenus spumarius and Neophilaenus campestris to acquire and transmit Xylella fastidiosa subsp. multiplex sequence type 87 from and to Rhamnus alaternus was evaluated in two-year semi-field experiments. To acquire the bacterium, insects were confined on wild, naturally infected R. alaternus shrubs for 120 h. Then, they were transferred to healthy plants and maintained in cages for 96 h. To follow the infection, plant samples were collected every two months for three times. Tested plants were destroyed at the end of experiments and roots, twigs and leaves were analysed. Philaenus spumarius showed a significantly higher survival rate than N. campestris. The infection status of both insects and plants was assessed through molecular analysis. P. spumarius and N. campestris were able to infect healthy plants although the acquisition rate and the estimated probability of transmission appeared to be low. These findings provide new accounts on the role of two polyphagous insect vectors in spreading a quarantine organism, which is lethal to a huge number of plant species. However, further studies are needed to disclose more specific interactions within this complex pathosystem.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Key Message
-
Spittlebugs are putative vectors of Xylella fastidiosa subspecies multiplex in Mediterranean countries.
-
P. spumarius and N. campestris, positive to X. fastidiosa multiplex, were found on Mediterranean vegetation.
-
Semi-field acquisition and transmission tests were performed using these two spittlebug species.
-
R. alaternus was used as source and recipient plant in acquisition and transmission experiments.
-
P. spumarius and N. campestris were able to infect healthy plants.
Introduction
The plant-pathogen Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al. 1987) is a Gram-negative bacterium, belonging to the family Xanthomonadaceae that colonizes the xylem of more than 600 plant species, including ornamental, landscape and cultivated herbs and trees (EFSA 2023). During its growth, the bacterium produces a biofilm and synthetizes several pathogenicity factors (Marques et al. 2002; Killiny et al. 2013; Rapicavoli et al. 2018). This metabolic activity can lead to the occlusion of the xylem vessels and to the development of scorch and dwarfing diseases in the infected plants (Janse and Obradovich 2010). In the Americas, X. fastidiosa severely affects grapevine causing the well-known Pierce’s disease (PD) (Davis et al. 1978; Hopkins and Purcell 2002), as well as almond, peach, apricot, plum, pecan, blueberry, citrus, and coffee (EFSA 2018). Besides being pathogenic in more than 100 plant species (Rapicavoli et al. 2018), the bacterium can latently remain in hosts which do not show disease symptoms, representing a reservoir of X. fastidiosa in the environment (Chatterjee et al. 2008; Sicard et al. 2018).
Xylella fastidiosa’s short range dispersion is mediated by insect vectors (Redak et al. 2004; Krugner et al. 2019), while its spread over longer distances is mostly due to the global plant trade (Sicard et al. 2018). Although all Hemipteran xylem sap feeders (Cicadoidea, Cercopoidea and Cicadellinae) could potentially acquire and transmit the bacterium, their actual role as vectors has been assessed only for some species, mainly belonging to the subfamily Cicadellinae and to the family Aphrophoridae (Redak et al. 2004; Cornara et al. 2017; Cavalieri et al. 2019; Krugner et al. 2019; Müller et al. 2021). On the contrary, cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) do not seem involved in the transmission of the bacterium, at least in Europe (Cornara et al. 2020; Mesmin et al. 2023).
Xylella fastidiosa is considered a genetically diverse species with three currently accepted subspecies named fastidiosa, multiplex, and pauca (Bull et al. 2012; Denancé et al. 2019), however, many strains have been described so far (Yuan et al. 2010; Giampetruzzi et al. 2015; Denancé et al. 2017; Saponari et al. 2019). Subspecies differ for the area of origin and for the host range, often showing a clear host-specificity also at strain level (Nunney et al. 2013). Xylella fastidiosa subsp. fastidiosa is native to southern Central America and is the causal agent of the Pierce’s disease of grapevine, while X. fastidiosa subsp. pauca (XFP) originated in South America and infects mainly plants of the genera Citrus and Coffea (Almeida et al. 2008). However, in 2013 the sequence type (ST) 53 of XFP was reported for the first time in Europe and ascertained as the causal agent of the Olive quick decline syndrome (OQDS), a severe vascular disease that has led to the death of thousands of olive trees in Apulia, southern Italy (Saponari et al. 2013, 2017). After this first outbreak, XFP was also detected in France and in Balearic Islands (Denancé et al. 2017; Moralejo et al. 2019). Like XFP, X. fastidiosa multiplex (XFM) has recently spread in Europe, occurring in Central Italy (Tuscany and Latium), southern France, Corsica, Balearic Islands and mainland Spain (Alicante province), and Portugal (Denancé et al. 2017; Marchi et al. 2018; Trkulja et al. 2022; EPPO 2022; Cunty et al. 2022; Loureiro et al. 2023). XFM has the largest host range among the reported subspecies and is the only one native to the United States (Nunney et al. 2010). This subspecies is typically distributed in temperate zones and infects mainly tree species causing the Almond Leaf Scorch and other scorch diseases in wild and cultivated trees (Nunney et al. 2013). Almond trees are the most infected plants in Spain, while in France XFM primarily infects Polygala myrtifolia L. (Denancé et al. 2017; EFSA 2023). In Italy, XFM was reported in 2018 in the area of the Monte Argentario promontory in Tuscany (Marchi et al. 2018), where a different ST was identified and named ST87 (Saponari et al. 2019). The Tuscan outbreak is characterized by the infection of many Mediterranean landscape plants such as the Spanish broom (Spartium junceum L.), the Italian buckthorn (Rhamnus alaternus L.) and the hairy thorny broom (Cytisus laniger DC.) (EFSA 2023; Fitosirt database, https://fitosirt.regione.toscana.it). This situation strongly resembles that of Corsica Island, where XFM prevails on XFP, infecting ornamental plants and wild species of the natural Mediterranean vegetation (Denancé et al. 2017; Cruaud et al. 2018; Cunty et al. 2022). Although XFM does not currently affect crops in Italy, it could threaten agricultural areas, since it could also infect many cultivated trees like the olive tree (EFSA, 2023). Moreover, its impact on the maquis, the native flora of the Mediterranean region, must not be overlooked.
As frequently underlined in previous studies, X. fastidiosa pathosystems may also be very different from one another, therefore overgeneralizing such acquired knowledge could lead to inaccurate conclusions (Sicard et al. 2018; Jeger and Bragard 2019; Desprez-Loustau et al. 2021). So far, spittlebugs in the family Aphrophoridae, especially Philaenus spumarius (Linnaeus 1758), were assessed to be the main European vectors of X. fastidiosa (Cornara et al. 2016, 2017; Cavalieri et al. 2019). The role of P. spumarius in the epidemiology of the OQDS was evaluated and supported by numerous studies on the ecology and transmission efficiency of this species (Elbeaino et al. 2014; Saponari et al. 2014; Cornara et al. 2016, 2018). Moreover, the ability to transmit XFP has been proved, under experimental condition, also for Neophilaenus campestris (Fallén 1805) and Philaenus italosignus Drosopoulos and Remane 2000 (Cavalieri et al. 2019). The presence of these three spittlebug species was reported also for Tuscany (Mazzoni 2005; Panzavolta et al. 2019; Gargani et al. 2021), although P. italosignus appears to be restricted only to the coastal area of the Province of Grosseto (Southern Tuscany) and may be absent in the Monte Argentario promontory (Gargani et al. 2021). In the latter area, P. spumarius and N. campestris are the two most abundant spittlebugs and some specimens of both species were found positive to XFM ST 87 (Gargani et al. 2021). Even though P. spumarius and N. campestris were also found positive to the other Xylella ST reported in Corsica, France, and Spain (Cruaud et al. 2018; Generalitat Valenciana 2020), their involvement in the transmission of the bacterium in natural areas populated by Mediterranean shrubs has never been assessed.
This study is aimed at evaluating the ability of P. spumarius and N. campestris to acquire and transmit XFM from infected to healthy plants. Their efficiency as vectors has been verified in semi-field trials, using the Italian buckthorn as experimental plant species. Then, the role of these spittlebugs in the transmission of X. fastidiosa in natural areas is discussed.
Materials and methods
Acquisition and transmission experiments were carried out in the demarcated area of Monte Argentario (Ministerial Decree 13/02/2018 and subsequent amendments). The entire procedure was repeated two times: from June 2020 to February 2021 and from June 2021 to February 2022. Rhamnus alaternus was chosen as test plant because it was one of the species of the Mediterranean maquis most frequently found infected in the Monte Argentario area (Fitosirt database https://fitosirt.regione.toscana.it) and for its availability in nurseries as small plants fitting the size of our experimental cages.
Collection of insects
Adults of P. spumarius and N. campestris were collected in June in two Xylella-free areas in the province of Florence (Tuscany) using sweeping nets. Specimens of both species were collected from herbaceous plants and Cupressus sempervirens L. trees in vineyards and their surroundings. Overall, more than 230 P. spumarius and 230 N. campestris specimens were collected in both experimental periods. Each specimen was individually placed in 1.5 mL micro vials and brought to the laboratory for the taxonomical identification. Spittlebugs were identified under a stereomicroscope, according to the most common taxonomic keys (Biedermann and Niedringhaus 2009; Drosopoulos and Remane 2000; Holzinger et al. 2003; Kunz et al. 2011; Wilson et al. 2015). In addition, morphological identifications were confirmed by DNA sequencing performed on randomly selected specimens using the 5’ region of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene as follows: DNA was extracted from dissected head using QIAmp DNA extraction Kit (QIAGEN) following the manufacturer instructions; the final elution step was performed in 50 μL of AE buffer supplied with the kit. Amplification was obtained using LCO1490 and HCO2198 (Folmer et al. 1994) primers for Neophilaenus sp. and LCOPhilaenus (5’-TCTACTAATCACAAAGATATCGG-3’; this work) and HCO2198 (Folmer et al. 1994) primers for Philaenus sp. PCR reaction was performed in 50.0 μL total volume containing 25.0 μL of DreamTaq Hot Start PCR Master Mix (2X) (ThermoFisher Scientific), 0.6 μM of each primer and 50 ng of DNA. The resulting amplicons were purified and sequenced using SeqStudio genetic analyser (Applied Biosystems) following the suggested protocol.
After the species identification, insects were transferred to Monte Argentario keeping them in two separated Bugdorm© cages containing potted non-infected plants supplied as food source.
Acquisition and transmission tests
Before setting acquisition-transmission tests, 20 P. spumarius and 20 N. campestris were randomly chosen among those collected in field and analysed by qPCR (EPPO 2019; Harper et al. 2010, Erratum 2013) to confirm the absence of the bacterium.
For both P. spumarius and N. campestris, acquisition trials were performed by confining the spittlebugs on branches of naturally infected R. alaternus wild shrubs, located in the municipalities of Porto Ercole (42.37701N, 11.18620E) and Porto Santo Stefano (42.431764N, 11.141622E) (Fig. S1). The infection status of these plants had been assessed by the Regional Health Plant Service (RHPS—Tuscany) during the annual surveillance program, and the presence of X. fastidiosa in the selected branches was confirmed by molecular analysis according to PM7/24 (4) (EPPO 2019; Harper et al. 2010, Erratum 2013).
The procedure to determine the Acquisition Access Period (AAP) and the Inoculation Access Period (IAP) was adopted from Cavalieri et al. (2019) with a few modifications to optimize the acquisition and transmission efficiencies: (a) 120 h instead of 96 h AAP; (b) a higher number of specimens per test plant in IAPs.
For each branch, 35 spittlebugs were caged in a fine mesh net sleeve for an AAP of 120 h. Overall, a total of 175 specimens for both P. spumarius and N. campestris (35 spittlebugs × 5 branches) were used for the AAP in both years. The infected plants were destroyed at the end of the AAP, as requested by current legislation.
Ten R. alaternus potted plants were tested for the absence of X. fastidiosa using the qPCR protocol reported in PM7/24 (4) (EPPO 2019) and used as receiving host for the transmission tests. Each plant was individually placed in a Bugdorm© cage with the insects previously exposed to the AAP, as shown in the Tables 1 and 2. Different numbers of caged specimens were due to the natural mortality occurred during the AAP.
Five cages for each spittlebug species were set up and maintained at room temperature and natural lighting. Rhamnus alaternus plants were watered once a week at field capacity. Insects were allowed to feed freely on tested plants for 96 h as IAP. In total 159 P. spumarius (ranging from 29 to 35 specimens per cage) and 140 N. campestris (from 18 to 35 specimens per cage) were used for the inoculation test in 2020, while 124 P. spumarius (from 21 to 32 specimens per cage) and 118 N. campestris (from 21 to 27 specimens per cage) were used in 2021. In all the IAP experiments, a higher number of insects per test plant was used respect to the procedure by Cavalieri et al. (2019), to increase the probability of transmitting the bacterium.
At the end of the IAP, both dead and alive insects were removed from the cages and stored individually in 96% ethanol. DNA was extracted from insect heads following the same protocol previously described (EPPO 2019; Harper et al. 2010, Erratum 2013). Every two months leaves and branches were pruned from the four sides of each R. alaternus plant until the end of the experiment, when plants were destroyed and roots, stem, twigs, and leaves were separately collected. All these plant portions were analysed for assessing the presence of the bacterium. In the 2021 experiment, the final sampling of plant organs was brought forward to December 2021 instead of February 2022 for plants tested with P. spumarius, since all the plants were dead. For this reason, some samples were taken from dead plants. DNA from plant material was extracted using DNeasy Plant Kit (QIAGEN) following the protocol suggested by the manufacturer. The final elution step was performed in 200 μL of AE buffer supplied with the kit.
Insects and plants were analysed performing qPCR and assuming 32 and 35 cycles as cut-off threshold limits for plants and insects respectively (EPPO 2019; Gargani et al. 2021). Plants were considered infected by the bacterium when at least one of the examined portions gave positive results. The quantification of bacterial load in insects and plants was not assessed through qPCR due to the lack of a bacterial culture of XFM. Limitations in the temporary laboratory’s equipment and its set up hampered the isolation of the bacterium. Moreover, XF could not be provided by authorized laboratory due to concomitant COVID-19 restrictions.
All the experimental procedures are shown as a workflow in the Fig. 1.
Data analysis
Data collected during the two experimental years were cumulated for statistical analysis. The Chi-square test (Yates’ correction for continuity) was performed to compare the survival and the acquisition rate observed for the two spittlebug species at the end of the IAP. Statistical significance was accepted for p-values < 0.05 level.
Since, a multiple-vector transfer experimental design was applied in this study, the Swallow’s formula \(\widehat{p}=1-{\left(1-H\right)}^\frac{1}{k}\) was used to estimate the probability of transmission of X. fastidiosa by a single vector (\(\widehat{p}\)). This probability depends on the proportion of infected plants (H) and on the number of tested vectors per plant (k) (Swallow 1985). Finally, the Chi-square test was used also to compare the probability of transmission estimated for P. spumarius and N. campestris. Statistical analyses were performed using PAST 4.0 (Hammer et al. 2001).
Results
At the end of the IAP, most of P. spumarius specimens were alive, with a survival rate of 90.81%; while only the 56.59% of N. campestris specimens survived, showing a significant difference in the viability of the two spittlebug species (χ2 = 81.398; df = 1; p < 0.05).
Both insect species were able to acquire and transmit the bacterium XFM ST87 from infected to healthy R. alaternus plants, as shown in Table 1 and Table 2, with acquisition rates of 4.24% for P. spumarius and 1.16% for N. campestris (Table 3). There was no significant difference in mean acquisition rates for these two spittlebug species (χ2 = 3.669; df = 1; p = 0.05).
Five out of ten R. alaternus plants were found infected after the exposition to AAP-P. spumarius, while AAP-N. campestris infected three of the ten tested plants. The estimated probability (Table 3) of transmission by a single P. spumarius (\(\widehat{p}\) = 0.024 ± 0.001) was higher than that expected for N. campestris (\(\widehat{p}\) = 0.014 ± 0.001); nevertheless, no statistically significant differences in the mean transmission probabilities were observed between the two spittlebug species (χ2 = 35.007; df = 1; p > 0.05).
Discussion
The sequence type 87 of XFM was reported in Monte Argentario area primarily on Mediterranean shrubs and trees (Marchi et al. 2018; Saponari et al. 2019). Among these plants, the Italian buckthorn represents one of the species most frequently found infected after the outbreak was discovered (Fitosirt database https://fitosirt.regione.toscana.it).
Recent faunistic studies on the Auchenorrhyncha of Monte Argentario stated that P. spumarius and N. campestris were the two most abundant potential vectors occurring in this area (Gargani et al. 2021). Moreover, these are the only two species that have been found positive to the X. fastidiosa strain causing scorch diseases in Tuscany (Gargani et al. 2021; Fitosirt database https://fitosirt.regione.toscana.it). In the present study, the competence of P. spumarius and N. campestris in the acquisition and transmission of the XFM ST87 from and to R. alaternus plants was evaluated in semi-field experiments. While, the ability of both spittlebugs to transmit XFM ST87 to healthy plants was evidenced, results highlighted a low transmission efficiency for both species.
P. spumarius showed a significantly higher rate of survival on R. alaternus plants than N. campestris. The meadow spittlebug is well-known to be highly polyphagous, with hundreds of plant species reported as hosts (Weaver and King 1954; Yurtsever 2000; Cornara et al. 2018). On the other hand, N. campestris displays a narrower host range than that of P. spumarius: juveniles are primarily associated to monocots, while adults show a marked preference for conifers (Whittaker 1971; Nickel 2003; Mazzoni 2005; Lago et al. 2021). The high mortality of N. campestris may be explained by a possible unsuitability of R. alaternus as food plant for this spittlebug species. However, the survival rate observed in N. campestris is quite comparable to those recorded on Olea europaea L., P. mirtyfolia L., and Catharanthus roseus G. Don (Cavalieri et al. 2019). Low acquisition rates (< 5%) were observed for both P. spumarius and N. campestris in our experiment, even though the ability of the two spittlebugs to acquire the bacterium from R. alaternus was demonstrated. For these insect species the acquisition of XFM seems to be less efficient than that recorded for XFP infecting other source plants, even if the duration of the AAP in this study was longer in comparison to the research by Cavalieri et al. (2019). As a matter of fact, P. spumarius showed an acquisition rate > 15% when field-grown olive plants were used as source of XFP (Cavalieri et al. 2019). Likewise, N. campestris’s performance in the same experimentation was much better (acquisition rate > 5%) than the rate recorded in our study for XFM infecting wild R. alaternus trees. Again, higher acquisition rates by P. spumarius were observed after 48 h AAP on C. roseus (19.6%) and P. mirtyfolia (21.6%) infected by XFP (Bodino et al. 2022).
It has already been documented that the transmission efficiency of a vector species can vary depending on the bacterium strain and source plants. For instance, P. spumarius showed a higher efficiency in transmitting X. fastidiosa to grapevine and almond when it acquired the bacterium from grapevine instead than from almond (Purcell 1980). Another X. fastidiosa vector, the glassy-winged sharpshooter Homalodisca vitripennis (Germar 1821), appeared to be more efficient in the transmission of X. fastidiosa subsp. fastidiosa to grapevine than to almond, thus playing a major role in the epidemiology of the Pierce’s disease of grapevine in comparison to the spread of Almond Leaf Scorch (Almeida and Purcell 2003). Moreover, this sharpshooter successfully transmitted XFM from almond to almond, but not to grapevine (Lopes et al. 2009). Finally, considerable differences in the transmission efficiency of X. fastidiosa subsp. fastidiosa by H. vitripennis were observed also according to the sequence type of the bacterium (Lopes et al. 2009).
At the end of our experiment, a few spittlebugs (of both species) that have acquired X. fastidiosa were able to infect healthy R. alaternus plants. Interestingly, when a single N. campestris was positive to the bacterium the infection of the recipient plant always occurred. This pattern was not observed for P. spumarius. We cannot exclude that this situation is due to the low number of compared specimens, so further tests could increase statistical robustness. However, the estimated probability to transmit the bacterium appeared to be low and did not significantly differ between P. spumarius (2.4%) and N. campestris (1.4%). Overall, the transmission probability for P. spumarius appears lower than that observed for the transmission of XFP to olive trees, where the probability reached 7.2% (Cavalieri et al. 2019). On the other hand, it seems that there is a higher possibility of N. campestris infecting R. alaternus than infecting olive trees (Cavalieri et al. 2019). In any case, estimated probabilities for both P. spumarius and N. campestris seem to be lower than those calculated for other proved vectors of XFM, which are the sharpshooter vectors of the Plum Leaf Scald (Müller et al. 2021).
In conclusion, P. spumarius and N. campestris can transmit the XFM ST87, albeit the efficiency of P. spumarius seems to be lower than that recorded in the transmission of XFP ST53. In the case of N. campestris, this difference does not appear particularly remarkable.
In addition to the previously discussed factors, the number of bacterial cells in infected xylem vessels could affect the efficiency of the vector (Almeida et al. 2005; Lopes et al. 2009; Daugherty et al. 2010). Although the infection status of tested insects and plant material was assessed during our experiments, the content of bacterial cells in infected samples was not quantified. So, we cannot exclude that the low acquisition rate and the low transmission probability observed in our material resulted from a small quantity of bacterial cells in source plants and tested spittlebugs. As a matter of fact, acquisition and inoculation trials from and to grapevine demonstrated that a higher amount of X. fastidiosa in the source plant induced a greater percentage of transmission success by sharpshooter leafhoppers (Hill and Purcell 1997).
This work constitutes the first assessment of P. spumarius and N. campestris ability to transmit XFM ST87, detected in Tuscany, to R. alaternus, a common bush in the Mediterranean scrub. Although these findings are not conclusive, they are relevant for the ongoing X. fastidiosa outbreaks in Italy and Europe as well as in United States and worldwide. As a matter of fact, our results provide new accounts on the role of two polyphagous insect vectors in spreading a quarantine organism which is lethal to a huge number of wild and cultivated plant species. Notwithstanding these preliminary outcomes, further studies are necessary to evaluate the roles played by the source and the recipient plant species, as well as the relationship between pathogen isolate—vector species—host plant in order to better understand the X. fastidiosa pathosystem involving the subsp. multiplex.
References
Almeida RPP, Purcell AH (2003) Transmission of Xylella fastidiosa to grapevines by Homalodisca coagulata (Hemiptera Cicadellidae). J Econ Entomol 96:264–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/96.2.264
Almeida RPP, Blua MJ, Lopes JR, Purcell AH (2005) Vector transmission of Xylella fastidiosa: applying fundamental knowledge to generate disease management strategies. Ann Entomol Soc Am 98:775–786. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746(2005)098[0775:VTOXFA]2.0.CO;2
Almeida RPP, Nascimento FE, Chau J, Prado SS, Tsai CW, Lopes SA, Lopes JR (2008) Genetic structure and biology of Xylella fastidiosa strains causing disease in citrus and coffee in Brazil. Appl Environ Microb 74:3690–3701. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02388-07
Biedermann R, Niedringhaus R (2009) The plant- and leafhoppers of Germany: identification key to all species. WABV-Fründ, Scheeßel, Germany
Bodino N, Cavalieri V, Saponari M, Dongiovanni C, Altamura G, Bosco D (2022) Transmission of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca ST53 by the sharpshooter Cicadella viridis from different source plants and artificial diets. J Econ Entomol 115:1852–1858. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toac172
Bull CT, De Voer SH, Denny TP, Firrao G, Fischer-Le Saux M, Saddler GS, Scortichini M, Stead DE, Takikawa Y (2012) List of new names of plant pathogenic bacteria (2008–2010). J Plant Pathol 94:21–27. (available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/45156005)
Cavalieri V, Altamura G, Fumarola G, di Carolo M, Saponari M, Cornara D, Bosco D, Dongiovanni C (2019) Transmission of Xylella fastidiosa subspecies pauca sequence type 53 by different insect species. InSects 10:324. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10100324
Chatterjee S, Almeida RPP, Lindow S (2008) Living in two worlds: the plant and insect lifestyles of Xylella fastidiosa. Annu Rev Phytopathol 46:243–271. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.062806.094342
Cornara D, Saponari M, Zeilinger AR, De Stradis A, Boscia D, Loconsole G, Bosco D, Martelli GP, Almeida RPP, Porcelli F (2016) Spittlebugs as vectors of Xylella fastidiosa in olive orchards in Italy. J Pest Sci 90:521–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-016-0793-0
Cornara D, Cavalieri V, Dongiovanni C, Altamura G, Palmisano F, Bosco D, Porcelli F, Almeida RPP, Saponari M (2017) Transmission of Xylella fastidiosa by naturally infected Philaenus spumarius (Hemiptera, Aphrophoridae) to different host plants. J Appl Entomol 141:80–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12365
Cornara D, Bosco D, Fereres A (2018) Philaenus spumarius: when an old acquaintance becomes a new threat to European agriculture. J Pest Sci 91:957–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-018-0966-0
Cornara D, Marra M, Tedone B, Cavalieri V, Porcelli F, Fereres A, Purcell A, Saponari M (2020) No evidence for cicadas’ implication in Xylella fastidiosa epidemiology. Entomol Gen 40:125–132. https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2020/0912
Cruaud A, Gonzalez AA, Godefroid M, Nidelet S, Streito JC, Thuillier JM, Rossi JP, Santoni S, Rasplus JY (2018) Using insects to detect, monitor and predict the distribution of Xylella fastidiosa: a case study in Corsica. Sci Rep 8:15628. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33957-z
Cunty A, Legendre B, de Jerphanion P, Dousset C, Forveille A, Paillard S, Olivier V (2022) Update of the Xylella fastidiosa outbreak in France: two new variants detected and a new region affected. Eur J Plant Pathol 163:505–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-022-02492-z
Daugherty MP, Lopes J, Almeida RPP (2010) Vector within-host feeding preference mediates transmission of a heterogeneously distributed pathogen. Ecol Entomol 35:360–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2010.01189.x
Davis MJ, Purcell AH, Thomson SV (1978) Pierce’s disease of grapevines: isolation of the causal bacterium. Science 199:75–77. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.199.4324.75
Denancé N, Legendre B, Briand M, Olivier V, De Boisseson C, Poliakoff F, Jacques MA (2017) Several subspecies and sequence types are associated with the emergence of Xylella fastidiosa in natural settings in France. Plant Pathol 66:1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12695
Denancé N, Briand M, Gaborieau R, Gaillard S, Jacques MA (2019) Identification of genetic relationships and subspecies signatures in Xylella fastidiosa. BMC Genomics 20:239. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-5565-9
Desprez-Loustau ML, Balci Y, Cornara D, Gonthier P, Robin C, Jacques MA (2021) Is Xylella fastidiosa a serious threat to European forests? Forestry 94:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpaa029
Drosopoulos S, Remane R (2000) Biogeographic studies on the spittlebug Philaenus signatus Melichar, 1986 species group (Hemiptera: Aphrophoridae) with the description of two new allopatric species. Ann Soc Entomol Fr 36:269–277
Elbeaino T, Yaseen T, Valentini F, Moussa IEB, Mazzoni V, D’Onghia AM (2014) Identification of three potential insect vectors of Xylella fastidiosa in southern Italy. Phytopathol Mediterr 53:328–332. https://doi.org/10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-14113
EPPO (2019) PM 7/24 (4) Xylella fastidiosa. EPPO Bull 49:175–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12575
EPPO Reporting Service no. 05—2022 Article number: 2022/111. https://gd.eppo.int/reporting/article-7342.
Fitosirt database. https://fitosirt.regione.toscana.it. Accessed 22 Nov 2023
Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mari Biol Biotech 3:294–299. (available at https://www.mbari.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Folmer_94MMBB.pdf)
Gargani E, Benvenuti C, Marianelli L, Roversi PF, Ricciolini M, Scarpelli I, Sacchetti P, Nencioni A, Rizzo D, Strangi A, Iovinella I, Cutino I (2021) A five-year survey in Tuscany (Italy) and detection of Xylella fastidiosa subspecies multiplex in potential insect vectors, collected in Monte Argentario. Redia 104:75–88. https://doi.org/10.19263/REDIA-104.21.09
Generalitat Valenciana (2020). Plan de acción frente a Xylella fastidiosa en la comunitat valenciana. https://www.asfplant.com/wp-content/uploads/Plan-accio%CC%81n-Diciembre-2020_firmado.pdf. Accessed Nov 2023
Giampetruzzi A, Chiumenti M, Saponari M, Donvito G, Italiano A, Loconsole G, Boscia D, Cariddi C, Martelli GP, Saldarelli P (2015) Draft genome sequence of the Xylella fastidiosa CoDiRO strain. Genome Announc 3:e01538-e1614. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01538-14
EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), Gibin D, Pasinato L, Delbianco A (2023) Scientific report on the update of the Xylella spp. host plant database—systematic literature search up to 31 December 2022. EFSA J 21:8061. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8061
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4:4. (available at: https://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/past.pdf)
Harper SJ, Ward LI, Clover GRG (2010) Development of LAMP and real-time PCR methods for the rapid detection of Xylella fastidiosa for quarantine and field applications. (Erratum 2013). Phytopathology 100:1282–1288. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-06-10-0168
Hill BL, Purcell AH (1997) Populations of Xylella fastidiosa in plants required for transmission by an efficient vector. Phytopathology 87:1197–1201. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.12.1197
Holzinger W, Kammerlander I, Nickel H (2003) The Auchenorrhyncha of Central Europe. Die Zikaden Mitteleuropas, Volume 1: Fulgoromorpha, Cicadomorpha excl. Cicadellidae. Brill Academic Publishers, Leiden
Hopkins DL, Purcell AH (2002) Xylella fastidiosa: cause of Pierce’s disease of grapevine and other emergent diseases. Plant Dis 86:1056–1066. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.10.1056
Janse JD, Obradovic A (2010) Xylella fastidiosa: its biology, diagnosis, control and risks. J Plant Pathol 92:S35–S48 (available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41998754)
Jeger M, Bragard C (2019) The epidemiology of Xylella fastidiosa. A perspective on current knowledge and framework to investigate plant host–vector–pathogen interactions. Phytopathology 109:200–209. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-07-18-0239-FI
Killiny N, Martinez RH, Dumenyo CK, Cooksey DA, Almeida RPP (2013) The exopolysaccharide of Xylella fastidiosa is essential for biofilm formation, plant virulence, and vector transmission. Mol Plant-Microbe in 26:1044–1053. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-09-12-0211-R
Krugner R, Sisterson MS, Backus EA, Burbank LP, Redak RA (2019) Sharpshooters: a review of what moves Xylella fastidiosa. Austral Entomol 58:248–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/aen.12397
Kunz G, Nickel H, Niedringhaus R (2011) Fotoatlas der Zikaden Deutschlands: photographic atlas of the planthoppers and leafhoppers of Germany. WABV-Fründ, Germany
Lago C, Morente M, De las Heras-Bravo D, Martí-Campoy A, Rodríguez-Ballester F, Plaza M, Moreno A, Fereres A (2021) Dispersal of Neophilaenus campestris, a vector of Xylella fastidiosa, from olive groves to over-summering hosts. J Appl Entomol 145:648–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12888
Lopes JR, Daugherty MP, Almeida RPP (2009) Context-dependent transmission of a generalist plant pathogen: host species and pathogen strain mediate insect vector competence. Entomol Exp Appl 131:216–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2009.00847.x
Loureiro T, Mesquita MM, Dapkevicius MDLE, Serra L, Martins Â, Cortez I, Poeta P (2023) Xylella fastidiosa: a glimpse of the Portuguese situation. Microbiol Res 14:1568–1588. https://doi.org/10.3390/microbiolres14040108
Marchi G, Rizzo D, Ranaldi F, Ghelardini L, Ricciolini M, Scarpelli I, Drosera L, Emanuele G, Capretti P, Surico G (2018) First detection of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. multiplex DNA in Tuscany (Italy). Phytopathol Mediterr 57:363–364. https://doi.org/10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-24454
Marques LLR, Ceri H, Manfio GP, Reid DM, Olson ME (2002) Characterization of biofilm formation by Xylella fastidiosa in vitro. Plant Dis 86:633–638. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.6.633
Mazzoni V (2005) Contribution to the knowledge of the Auchenorrhyncha (Hemiptera Fulgoromorpha and Cicadomorpha) of Tuscany (Italy). Redia 88:85–102. (available at: https://www.redia.it/images/stories/pdf2005/12%20Mazzoni.pdf)
Mesmin X, Lambert M, Chartois M, Farigoule P, Cesari L, Quiquerez I, Borgomano S, Rossi J-P, Rasplus J-Y, Cruaud A (2023) No detection of Xylella fastidiosa in cicadas (Hemiptera, Cicadidae) sampled in infected areas of Corsica (France). J Appl Entomol 147:559–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.13120
Ministerial Decree DM 13/02/2018. Misure di emergenza per la prevenzione, il controllo e l'eradicazione di Xylella fastidiosa (Well et al.) nel territorio della Repubblica italiana. (18A02396) (GU Serie Generale n. 80 del 06-04-2018). https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2018/04/06/18A02396/sg. Accessed Nov 2023
Moralejo E, Borràs D, Gomila M, Montesinos M, Adrover F, Juan A, Nieto A, Olmo D, Seguí G, Landa BB (2019) Insights into the epidemiology of Pierce’s disease in vineyards of Mallorca, Spain. Plant Pathol 68:1458–1471. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13076
Müller C, Esteves MB, Kleina HT, Nondillo A, Botton M, Lopes JRS (2021) First sharpshooter species proven as vectors of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. multiplex in Prunus salicina trees in Brazil. Trop Plant Pathol 46:386–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-021-00430-8
Nickel H (2003) The leafhoppers and planthoppers of Germany (Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha): patterns and strategies in highly diverse group of phytophagous insects. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia-Moscow. and Goecke & Evers, Keltern
Nunney L, Yuan X, Bromley R, Hartung J, Montero-Astúa M, Moreira L, Ortiz B, Stouthamer R (2010) Population genomic analysis of a bacterial plant pathogen: novel insight into the origin of Pierce’s disease of grapevine in the US. PLoS ONE 5:e15488. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015488
Nunney L, Vickerman DB, Bromley RE, Russell SA, Hartman JR, Morano LD, Stouthamer R (2013) Recent evolutionary radiation and host plant specialization in the Xylella fastidiosa subspecies native to the United States. Appl Environ Microb 79:2189–2200. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03208-12
Panzavolta T, Bracalini M, Croci F, Ghelardini L, Luti S, Campigli S, Goti E, Marchi R, Tiberi R, Marchi G (2019) Philaenus italosignus a potential vector of Xylella fastidiosa: occurrence of the spittlebug on olive trees in Tuscany (Italy). Bull Insectology 72:317–320. (available at: http://www.bulletinofinsectology.org/pdfarticles/vol72-2019-317-320panzavolta.pdf)
Purcell AH (1980) Almond leaf scorch: leafhopper and spittlebug vectors. J Econ Entomol 73:834–838. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/73.6.834
Rapicavoli J, Ingel B, Blanco-Ulate B, Cantu D, Roper C (2018) Xylella fastidiosa: an examination of a re-emerging plant pathogen. Mol Plant Pathol 19:786–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12585
Redak RA, Purcell AH, Lopes JR, Blua MJ, Mizell RF III, Andersen PC (2004) The biology of xylem fluid–feeding insect vectors of Xylella fastidiosa and their relation to disease epidemiology. Annu Rev Entomol 49:243–270. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123403
Saponari M, Boscia D, Nigro F, Martelli GP (2013) Identification of DNA sequences related to Xylella fastidiosa in oleander, almond and olive trees exhibiting leaf scorch symptoms in Apulia (Southern Italy). J Plant Pathol 95:668. https://doi.org/10.4454/JPP.V95I3.035
Saponari M, Loconsole G, Cornara D, Yokomi RK, De Stradis A, Boscia D, Bosco D, Martelli GP, Krugner R, Porcelli F (2014) Infectivity and transmission of Xylella fastidiosa by Philaenus spumarius (Hemiptera: Aphrophoridae) in Apulia, Italy. J Econ Entomol 107:1316–1319. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC14142
Saponari M, Boscia D, Altamura G, Loconsole G, Zicca S, D’attoma G, Morelli M, Palmisano F, Saponari A, Tavano D, Savino VN, Dongiovanni C, Martelli GP (2017) Isolation and pathogenicity of Xylella fastidiosa associated to the olive quick decline syndrome in southern Italy. Sci Rep 7:17723. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17957-z
Saponari M, D’Attoma G, Abou Kubaa R, Loconsole G, Altamura G, Zicca S, Rizzo D, Boscia D (2019) A new variant of Xylella fastidiosa subspecies multiplex detected in different host plants in the recently emerged outbreak in the region of Tuscany, Italy. Eur J Plant Pathol 154:1195–1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-019-01736-9
Sicard A, Zeilinger AR, Vanhove M, Schartel TE, Beal DJ, Daugherty MP, Almeida RPP (2018) Xylella fastidiosa: insights into an emerging plant pathogen. Annu Rev Phytopathol 56:181–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-045849
Swallow WH (1985) Group testing for estimating infection rates and probabilities of disease transmission. Phytopathology 75:882–889. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-75-882
Trkulja V, Tomić A, Iličić R, Nožinić M, Milovanović TP (2022) Xylella fastidiosa in Europe: from the introduction to the current status. Plant Pathol J 38:551–571. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.RW.09.2022.0127
Weaver CR, King DR (1954) Meadow spittlebug Philaenus leucophthalmus (L.). Res Bull Ohio Agric Exp Stn 741:1–99. (Available at: https://kb.osu.edu/bitstream/handle/1811/63036/1/OARDC_research_bulletin_n0741.pdf)
Whittaker JB (1971) Population changes in Neophilaenus lineatus (L.) (Homoptera: Cercopidae) in different parts of its range. J Anim Ecol 40:425–443. https://doi.org/10.2307/3253
Wilson M, Stewart A, Biedermann R, Nickel H, Niedringhaus R (2015) The planthoppers and leafhoppers of Britain and Ireland: identification keys to all families and genera and all British and Irish species not recorded from Germany. WABV-Fründ, Germany
Yuan X, Morano L, Bromley R, Spring-Pearson S, Stouthamer R, Nunney L (2010) Multilocus sequence typing of Xylella fastidiosa causing Pierce’s disease and oleander leaf scorch in the United States. Phytopathology 100:601–611. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-100-6-0601
Yurtsever S (2000) On the polymorphic meadow spittlebug, Philaenus spumarius (L.) (Homoptera: Cercopidae). Turk J Zool 24:447–460. (available at: https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/vol24/iss4/13)
Acknowledgements
This research was partially funded by the Tuscany Regional Plant Health Service (RPS-Tuscany) within the scientific agreements (1) with the Council for Agricultural Research and Economics-Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification (CREA-DC) after ratification by the Regional Executive Decree n. 1426 issued on 11/23//2020 and n.19743 issued on 11/04/2021; (2) with the Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI) of the University of Florence, Regional Executive Decree n. 1422 issued on 11/23//2020.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Firenze within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. This research was partially funded by the Tuscany Regional Plant Health Service (RPS-Tuscany) within the scientific agreements (1) with the Council for Agricultural Research and Economics-Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification (CREA-DC) after ratification by the Regional Executive Decree n. 1426 issued on 11/23//2020 and n.19743 issued on 11/04/2021; (2) with the Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI) of the University of Florence, Regional Executive Decree n. 1422 issued on 11/23//2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AN, EG, and IC—conceived and designed research. AN, EG, AS, II, DR, PS, and IC—conducted experiments. EG, PFR, and PS—contributed equipment and/or analytical tools. AN, AS, II, and IC—analysed data. AN, EG, AS, IC, and II—wrote the first draft. AN, EG, PS, and IC—reviewed the manuscript. All of the authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical approval
No approval of research ethics committees was required to accomplish the goals of this study because experimental work was conducted with unregulated insect species, the two spittlebugs Philaenus spumarius and Neophilaenus campestris.
Additional information
Communicated by Alberto Fereres.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Fig. S1
Satellite image of the Monte Argentario promontory, Central Italy. Yellow pins indicate two Xylella fastidiosa subsp. multiplex ST87 foci characterized by the presence of infected Rhamnus alaternus plants. Experiments were carried out in Site 1 in 2020 and in Site 2 in 2021 (JPG 91 KB)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nencioni, A., Gargani, E., Strangi, A. et al. Transmission of Xylella fastidiosa subspecies multiplex from naturally infected to healthy Rhamnus alaternus by Philaenus spumarius and Neophilaenus campestris. J Pest Sci 97, 1557–1567 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-024-01775-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-024-01775-0