Abstract
Zoophytophagous predators can induce plant defence responses through phytophagous feeding. Since the zoophytophagous bug Orius sauteri lays eggs into plant tissues, we hypothesised that its oviposition behaviour may also induce plant defence responses with a negative impact on subsequent herbivore attacks. Pre-inoculation of O. sauteri females on tomato plants significantly reduced the fitness and reproduction of Frankliniella occidentalis, which also preferred the non-inoculated plants in indoor micro-environments. In the field, O. sauteri pre-inoculation also caused reduced population growth of F. occidentalis. All these tendencies were weaker with male compared to female O. sauteri pre-inoculation. Next, a transcriptome analysis showed that the MAPK signalling pathway, the plant hormone signal transduction and plant-pathogen interaction of defence-related pathways were significantly enriched in plants inoculated with O. sauteri females compared to untreated plants. We showed that three key genes of the JA pathway, allene oxide synthase (AOS), jasmonate ZIM-domain 2 (JAZ2), and proteinase inhibitor 1 (PI-1), were upregulated. This is evidence of plant defence activation, the likely mechanism by which O. sauteri pre-inoculation (through feeding and oviposition activities) reduced F. occidentalis fitness in the laboratory and population densities by almost three times in a greenhouse experiment. This mechanism could be promoted in IPM strategies through the early introduction of zoophytophagous biocontrol agents activating crop plant defences to enhance biological pest control.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Over more than 400 million years of co-evolution between plants and herbivores, plants have developed a series of diverse and complex defence mechanisms against herbivore attacks (Hilker and Fatouros 2015; Schuman and Baldwin 2016; Erb and Reymond 2019; Pearse et al. 2020; Chen et al. 2023; Liu et al. 2023). Understanding the diverse ecological and biological interactions between host plants, herbivores, and natural enemies may help identify effective integrated pest management (IPM) strategies to improve pest management in biological pest control programmes (McCormick et al. 2012; Turlings and Erb 2018; Erb et al. 2021; Cruz-Miralles et al. 2022; Munawar et al. 2022; Sun et al. 2022; Depalo et al. 2022). Although plant–herbivore interactions have been intensively studied (Dicke and Baldwin 2010; McCormick et al. 2012; Mithöfer and Boland 2012; Bai et al. 2022), the effects of zoophytophagous predators on plant defences and their consequences on herbivore behaviour have only been studied recently (Bouagga et al. 2018a,b; Pérez-Hedo et al. 2021, 2022; Zhang et al. 2021). The feeding or oviposition behaviour of several zoophytophagous predators can activate the same plant defence mechanisms as those triggered by herbivores, affecting the fitness of herbivores in biological pest control (De Puysseleyr et al. 2010; Zhang et al. 2018, 2019; Cruz-Miralles et al. 2021; Pérez-Hedo et al. 2018, 2021, 2022).
Plant defence mechanisms are generally activated by phytohormones in the jasmonic acid (JA)-, salicylic acid (SA)-, abscisic acid (ABA)-, and ethylene (ET)-related pathways to regulate transcriptional responses (Wu and Baldwin 2010; Erb et al. 2012; Li et al. 2021; Ye et al. 2021; Ibanez et al. 2022). The JA pathway in particular plays a critical role in activating plant defences against herbivore attacks (Wang et al. 2019; Li et al. 2022). For example, the feeding and oviposition behaviour of Orius laevigatus (Fieber) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) on plants significantly reduced the damage to plants by Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and by Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), through the activation of the JA and SA signalling pathways (De Puysseleyr et al. 2010; Bouagga et al. 2018b). Similarly, the zoophytophagous predator Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) (Hemiptera: Miridae) simultaneously activated the JA and ABA pathways in tomato plants by puncturing leaves; this induced the release of a mixture of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) repellent to the herbivores B. tabaci, F. occidentalis, Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae), and Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) (Pérez-Hedo et al. 2018, 2021, 2022). Finally, an inoculation of Macrolophus pygmaeus (Rambur) (Hemiptera: Miridae) on tomato and sweet pepper plants reduced the performance of F. occidentalis, T. urticae and B. tabaci by activating the JA and ABA signalling pathways, inducing plant defence responses (Pappas et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2018, 2019; Bouagga et al. 2018a). Recently, Pérez-Hedo et al. (2022) comprehensively reported that zoophytophagous predators, such as Miridae, Anthocoridae, Pentatomidae, and predatory mites, can induce plant defences, which in turn can enhance pest control efficiency, although the differences in plant-mediated effects of feeding versus oviposition are not well understood yet.
Many species of the zoophytophagous predator Orius genus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) have been extensively studied for their role as natural enemies controlling agricultural pests (e.g. Desneux et al. 2006; Ragsdale et al. 2011). The flower bug O. sauteri (Poppius) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) is widely used as an efficient biological control agent against thrips, whiteflies, aphids, spider mites, and eggs and young larvae of lepidopteran pests; it also naturally occurs in cultivated open fields in China (Zhao et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2018; Di et al. 2022; Mouden et al. 2017; Reitz et al. 2020). Although O. sauteri has a wide prey breadth, it prefers to prey upon F. occidentalis over whiteflies, spider mites, and aphids (Xu and Enkegaard 2009; Wang et al. 2014; Di et al. 2022). For this reason, O. sauteri has been used as the main biological control agent against F. occidentalis, which is one of the most devastating pests in horticultural crops, causing heavy yield losses worldwide (Mouden et al. 2017; Reitz et al. 2020).
In addition to feeding on prey, Orius species require plant resources for their development and reproduction (De Puysseleyr et al. 2010; Ding et al. 2021; Ren et al. 2022). Plants not only act as a source of water and nutrients but also serve as oviposition substrates for Orius species (Lundgren et al. 2008; De Puysseleyr et al. 2010). Orius species insert their eggs into plant tissues to obtain nutrients and the environmental conditions that allow offspring to survive for several days without additional resources (Di et al. 2022). In O. sauteri, eggs are almost entirely laid within plant tissues – with only a small part of the egg operculum exposed – causing obvious physical and physiological damage to the plant tissues (De Puysseleyr et al. 2010; Di et al. 2022). Hence, this special oviposition behaviour of O. sauteri may cause the same induced plant defence responses as those stimulated via phytophagous feeding by herbivores and zoophytophagous predators. Such plant defence priming could negatively affect the fitness of herbivores and improve pest management, similar to other zoophytophagous predators (De Puysseleyr et al. 2010; Bouagga et al. 2018a; Cruz-Miralles et al. 2021; Dahmane et al. 2022; Pérez-Hedo et al. 2022).
In this study, we measured the effects of pre-inoculating tomato plants with O. sauteri females (feeding and oviposition) or males (feeding only) on the performance of F. occidentalis in the laboratory and in greenhouses. In addition, a transcriptomic analysis was conducted to identify the key genes associated with plant defence induction and to measure their relative expression levels through time in plants inoculated with either female or male O. sauteri. This study aimed to establish a theoretical understanding of the ecological and biological interactions between the zoophytophagous predator O. sauteri and the pest F. occidentalis to enhance pest control efficiency.
Materials and methods
Plants and insects
Plants
Tomato Solanum lycopersicum L. plants were used as experimental materials. Tomato seeds (CV. Jiaxin M5020) were sown in a 24-hole seed tray (36.5 × 23.0 × 5.5 cm) filled with growth medium of a mixture of peat soil (Pindstrup Mosebrug A/S, 0 ~ 10 mm, Denmark) and vermiculite (3: 1, V: V). Then, each tomato seedling was transplanted at the two-leaf stage into a plastic flowerpot (8.0 × 8.0 × 10.0 cm) filled with growth medium of a mixture of peat soil, vermiculite, and pearlite (3:1:1, V:V:V). Tomato plants were grown under controlled conditions at day/night temperature of (26 ± 2)/(18 ± 2) °C, relative humidity (RH) of 50 ± 5%, photoperiod of 16/8 h (day/night), and 10,000 Lux fluorescent light in an insect-free artificial growth chamber located at the Institute of Plant Protection (BIPP), Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (BAAFS, Haidian District, Beijing, China). The tomato plants were grown to the five-leaf stage for subsequent experiments.
Insects
An initial adult colony of O. sauteri was collected from maize fields in Langfang, Hebei Province, China, during the summer of 2018, and the colony was re-supplied with new individuals from this area for rejuvenation every year. A colony was subsequently established and reared using hyacinth bean Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet pods (Fabales: Fabaceae). Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) eggs were used as food sources, as previously described (Di et al. 2022). A colony of F. occidentalis was obtained from the Institute of Plant Protection (IPP), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS, Haidian District, Beijing, China). Adults and nymphs of F. occidentalis were reared on hyacinth bean pods similar to O. sauteri (Di et al. 2022).
Fitness of F. occidentalis on tomato plants pre-inoculated with O. sauteri
Survival and fecundity of F. occidentalis on tomato plants pre-inoculated with O. sauteri
Tomato plants with five true leaves were used to measure the effect of O. sauteri pre-inoculation on the survival and fecundity of F. occidentalis on tomato plants. The third leaf from the bottom of each tomato plant was enclosed in a leaf cage (Di et al. 2022). Three treatments were used: (1) pre-inoculation of O. sauteri females (OsF), (2) pre-inoculation of O. sauteri males (OsM), and (3) control, no pre-inoculation. In (1) and (2), three mated O. sauteri females versus three males aged 3–5 days after emergence were inoculated into the leaf cage and were removed 24 h later. Then, 20 mated females of F. occidentalis aged 2–3 days after emergence were infested into each leaf cage. The number of surviving F. occidentalis adults was counted and recorded 24 and 48 h later, after which F. occidentalis adults were removed. 120 h after F. occidentalis infestation, the number of F. occidentalis F1 nymphs was recorded as a measure of fecundity. This experiment was conducted in an artificial growth chamber under the same environmental conditions as above (“Plants” section). There were 12 replicates per treatment in this experiment.
Preference of F. occidentalis for plants pre-inoculated with O. sauteri versus control plants
In a preference choice test for F. occidentalis, tomato plants and predators were treated as described above (“Survival and fecundity of F. occidentalis on tomato plants pre-inoculated with O. sauteri” section), except for the leaf cages. The leaf cage in this experiment was made of two parts, a nylon yarn net part (pore size: 150 μm; size: 15.0 cm × 13.0 cm) and a zip lock bag part connected to the base of the third leaf. Predators were removed 24 h after inoculation. Tomato plants from the control and OsF, control and OsM, and OsF and OsM groups were used in paired choice tests. Each plant from a pair was placed at one side of a choice system (ZL201922103394.4), which was made of two nylon yarn net bags (pore size: 150 μm; size: 30.0 cm × 25.0 cm), each covering a whole plant, and a glass T-tube fixed in the middle of the two bags. One F. occidentalis mated female aged 2–5 days after emergence was placed at the middle of the T-tube, and was left to choose between the two plants for 5 min. If it spent more than 15 s in one side, it was considered as a valid selection, while no choice during 5 min was considered an invalid selection; in this case, it was recorded as ‘no-choice’ and excluded from data analysis (Guo et al. 2019). After recording three individuals, the plant positions were swapped between the left and right side to avoid any spatial effect on choices and three new individuals were tested. This was repeated with a new plant combination. Each individual was tested only once. 48 individuals were tested for each combination.
Population dynamics of F. occidentalis on tomato plants pre-inoculated with O. sauteri
The experiments were conducted in a greenhouse at the Wangjiayuan Seven-Star Apple Professional Cooperative (Changping District, Beijing, China) in October and November 2020 and 2021. Tomato plants at the stage five true leaves were simultaneously transplanted into three greenhouses. In each greenhouse, three groups of six to ten tomato plants in two rows were established and randomly assigned to one of the three treatments (control, OsF, OsM). In 2020, the number of tomato plants per treatment were 9, 6, 9 in blocks A, B, C for control; 8, 10, 8 in blocks A, B, C for OsF; and 6, 6, 6 in blocks A, B, C for OsM. This asymmetric design due to logistic constraints was optimised in 2021, leading to 8, 10, 10 plants in blocks A, B, C for each treatment. Seven days later, plants were inoculated with O. sauteri as described above (“Preference of F. occidentalis for plants pre-inoculated with O. sauteri versus control plants” section), except that natural enemies were inoculated again every 14 days after the first inoculation at a rate of six individuals per leaf cage. This was to ensure a persistent inoculation effect of the predators on herbivores. Subsequently, 20 mated F. occidentalis females were released per tomato plant. The temperature and lighting conditions during the experiment followed the local natural sunlight environment under shelter. The number of adults and nymphs of F. occidentalis in all leaves of six to ten tomato plants in each treatment in each block was then recorded every 6–8 days for 1.5 months. The experiments were ended when the population dynamics of F. occidentalis decreased below the initial infestation density.
Oviposition behaviour of O. sauteri
Tomato plants with five true leaves were used to measure the oviposition of O. sauteri on tomato plants in the laboratory. A leaf cage (Di et al. 2022) was placed on the third leaf from the bottom of the tomato plants, and three O. sauteri mated females aged 3–5 days after emergence were inoculated into the leaf cage. The number of eggs laid was recorded 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after O. sauteri inoculation in 12 leaf cage replicates each, using a digital microscope (VHX-6000, Keyence, Japan). The shape of eggs was photographed on hyacinth bean pods using a cryogenic scanning electron microscope (Regulus 8100, Hitachi, Japan).
Transcriptome sequencing analysis of tomato plants pre-inoculated with O. sauteri
In this experiment, tomato plants were treated as described above (“Preference of F. occidentalis for plants pre-inoculated with O. sauteri versus control plants” section), and predators were removed from leaf cages 24 h later. Transcriptome sequencing analysis was performed using four biological replicates for each treatment. At this time, the third leaf from the bottom of each tomato plant was cut off, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at − 80 °C for future use. Total RNA was extracted from each tomato leaf sample using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA concentration was measured using a NanoDrop ONE spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 260 nm. RNA-seq library construction, RNA-seq, and RNA seq data analysis were conducted following Biomarker (Beijing, China) on an Illumina Xten HiSeq platform (Chen et al. 2023). The tomato reference genome Solanum lycopersicum_ITAG4.0 (https://solgenomics.net/organism/Solanum_lycopersicum/genome) was used. The relative expression abundances of RNA-seq were estimated based on the number of fragments per kilobase of transcript per million reads mapped (FPKM). Finally, we used the DESeq R package to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between plants inoculated with O. sauteri and control plants using the following criteria: fold change in expression level ≥ 1.5 or ≤ 0.67 and false discovery rate < 0.05 (Chen et al. 2023).
Relative expression of key genes in the JA pathways in tomato plants inoculated with O. sauteri
Because the JA pathway was found to be significantly enriched, we focussed on relative expression levels of key genes in the JA pathway. In this experiment, tomato plants were treated as described in “Preference of F. occidentalis for plants pre-inoculated with O. sauteri versus control plants” section, except for the duration of predator inoculation. The sampling timepoints were 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after inoculation. Five tomato plants were collected from each treatment at each timepoint. Total RNA was extracted, and we quantified its concentration in tomato leaves using the TRIzol reagent method described above (“Transcriptome sequencing analysis of tomato plants pre-inoculated with O. sauteri” section). Moreover, 1.0 μg of total RNA was treated by adding PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Perfect Real Time) (Takara, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan) to obtain the first-strand cDNA. The synthesised cDNA was immediately stored at -20 °C for subsequent use. The relative expression levels of the three genes allene oxide synthase (AOS), jasmonate ZIM-domain 2 (JAZ2), and proteinase inhibitor 1 (PI-1), were quantified at each timepoint for each treatment using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) on ABI QuantStudio™ 7 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Hercules, CA, USA) using TB Green® Premix EX Taq™ II (Tli RNaseH Plus) master mix (Takara, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan). The optimised qRT-PCR programme consisted of an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min; finally, melting curves were plotted at 95 °C for 15 s. Melting curves were analysed to determine the purity of the qRT-PCR products. qRT-PCR was performed on three technical replicates for each of the five biological replicates for each treatment and time point. The transcript levels of AOS, JAZ2, and PI-1 were expressed as normalised transcript abundances using Actin as an internal reference gene. The relative expression of AOS, JAZ2, and PI-1 were calculated according to the 2−△△Ct method. qRT-PCR primers were designed using the Primer 3+software (https://www.primer3plus.com) based on AOS, JAZ2, and PI-1 sequences of tomatoes in the NCBI database (Table S1).
Statistical analyses
All statistical analyses were performed using R Core Team (2023) version 4.3.1. The effect of the pre-inoculation treatment (control, O. sauteri female, O. sauteri male) in interaction with time (24 h or 48 h) on the survival rate of F. occidentalis was analysed using a generalised linear model (GLM) with a binomial error distribution (function ‘glm’; R Core Team, 2023). The effect of the pre-inoculation treatment on the fecundity (number of F1 nymphs) of F. occidentalis was analysed using a linear model (LM). The effect of the pre-inoculation treatment on F. occidentalis field densities each year (2020 and 2021) was tested using independent generalised linear mixed models (GLMMs) with a negative binomial error distribution (function ‘glmer.nb’; R library ‘lme4’; Bates et al. 2015). Each year, the pre-inoculation treatment (control, O. sauteri female, O. sauteri male) was implemented as a fixed effect in interaction with the covariate sampling date, while the plant nested in the block were implemented as random effects. The effect of the inoculation treatment (control, O. sauteri female or O. sauteri male) on the expression level of three genes of the JA pathway (AOS, JAZ2 and PI-1) was analysed using independent linear mixed models (LMMs) with the treatment in interaction with the time since inoculation as fixed effects, and the replicate as random effect. Data were previously square-root transformed for JAZ2 and PI-1.
The normality and homogeneity of residuals was checked a posteriori for each test in the best model using the function ‘plot(simulateResiduals())’ (R library ‘DHARMa’; Hartig 2022). The significance of interaction terms and single fixed effects were analysed in each test using an ANOVA with a χ2 test for GLMs, GLMMs and LMMs, and a Fisher test for LMs. When significant effects were found, post hoc mean comparisons were performed using the ‘emmeans’ function (R library ‘emmeans’; Lenth 2023). The choice test for F. occidentalis was analysed using a χ2 goodness-of-fit test using SPSS 25.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) based on a null model where the treated and control plants were selected with equal frequency. Individuals which did not make a choice were excluded from the statistical analysis.
Results
Fitness of F. occidentalis on tomato plants inoculated with O. sauteri
Survival and fecundity of F. occidentalis on tomato plants pre-inoculated with O. sauteri in the laboratory
The pre-inoculation treatment caused a reduction in F. occidentalis survival (Dev = 32.2, df = 2, P < 0.001; Fig. 1a) and the survival rate was lower after 48 h compared to 24 h (Dev = 10.1, df = 1, P = 0.0014). However, the effect of the pre-inoculation treatment did not vary across time (non-significant treatment by time interaction: Dev = 1.24, df = 2, P = 0.54). The reduced survival was observed in the O. sauteri female pre-inoculation treatment only, which was significantly lower compared to the control (estimate ± SE: − 0.798 ± 0.17, P < 0.001) and compared to the O. sauteri male pre-inoculation treatment (− 0.765 ± 0.17, P < 0.001), while the O. sauteri male pre-inoculation treatment was not different from the control (− 0.0329 ± 0.181, P = 0.98). The pre-inoculation treatment also caused a reduction in F. occidentalis fecundity (F2,33 = 39.0, P < 0.001; Fig. 1b): both O. sauteri female (estimate ± SE: − 22.6 ± 2.6, P < 0.001) and male (− 10.2 ± 2.6, P < 0.001) pre-inoculations caused a significant reduction in F1 nymphs numbers compared to the control, but the female pre-inoculation caused a stronger reduction compared to the male pre-inoculation (− 12.3 ± 2.6, P < 0.001).
Preference of F. occidentalis between plants pre-inoculated with O. sauteri and control plants in a laboratory choice test
In the choice test, F. occidentalis females showed a significant preference for control tomato plants over tomato plants pre-inoculated with O. sauteri females (OsF) (N = 42, no choice = 5, χ2 = 12.3, P < 0.001; Fig. 1c). There was no significant preference between control plants and tomato plants pre-inoculated with O. sauteri males (OsM) (N = 42, no choice = 5, χ2 = 2.38, P = 0.12), although they tended to choose OsM less often than control plants. Similarly, F. occidentalis chose OsM more frequently than OsF plants, but there was no significant difference (N = 42, no choice = 5, χ2 = 1.52, P = 0.22).
Field population dynamics of F. occidentalis on tomato plants pre-inoculated with O. sauteri
The population of F. occidentalis in the field first increased and then decreased in both years (Fig. 1d, e). The pre-inoculation treatment significantly reduced the abundances of F. occidentalis in interaction with the sampling date in 2020 (χ2 = 26.3, df = 10, P = 0.0034; Fig. 1d). Orius sauteri female pre-inoculation prevented F. occidentalis populations to reach a peak in early November, while the densities at the peak in the O. sauteri male pre-inoculation were intermediate between the control and the female pre-inoculation treatment (Table S3; Fig. 1d). In 2021, the pre-inoculation treatment also significantly reduced the densities of F. occidentalis (χ2 = 23.0, df = 2, P < 0.001; Fig. 1e), but independently of the sampling date (non-significant treatment * date interaction: χ2 = 11.5, df = 10, P = 0.32). Both O. sauteri female (estimate ± SE: − 0.802 ± 0.168, P < 0.001) and male (− 0.664 ± 0.168, P < 0.001) pre-inoculations led to reduced F. occidentalis densities compared to the control, but the O. sauteri female pre-inoculation effect was not different from the male one (-0.138 ± 0.172, P = 0.70).
Oviposition behaviour of O. sauteri on tomato plants
Eggs of O. sauteri were laid inside the plant tissues (Fig. 2a, c) with only the operculum exposed (Fig. 2b). The number of eggs laid by O. sauteri on tomato plants increased linearly with time (R2 = 0.9352). No eggs were laid before 24 h after the inoculation of O. sauteri, but a increase from 10.6 ± 0.9 at 24 h to 40.0 ± 1.6 at 96 h was recorded (Fig. 2d).
Transcriptome responses in tomato plants inoculated with O. sauteri
Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) after O. sauteri inoculation in tomato plants were identified to understand plant response to O. sauteri. The detailed information on RNA-seq data and mapping is summarised in Table S2. A total of 35,096 transcripts were detected across all samples (Data S1). 761 DEGs were identified, including 726 upregulated and 35 downregulated in OsF compared to control plants, 44 upregulated and 0 downregulated in OsM compared to control plants, and 48 upregulated and 1 downregulated in OsF compared to OsM plants, respectively (Fig. S1a, b, c; Data S2). The DEGs in control versus OsF, control versus OsM, and OsF versus OsM comparisons were assigned to 72, 16, and 19 KEGG pathways, respectively, and the top 20, 16, and 19 pathways for each pairwise comparison are shown in Fig. 3 and Table S3. Of these, the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling pathway-plant, plant hormone signal transduction, and plant-pathogen interaction were the only three pathways that were significantly enriched in OsF plants compared to control plants, and the relative abundance of their DEGs showed the highest expression in the OsF treatment, while there were no significantly enriched pathways in OsM plants compared to control plants or to OsF plants (Fig. S2).
Relative expression levels of key genes of the JA pathway in tomato plants inoculated with O. sauteri
The three key genes of the JA pathway – AOS, JAZ2 and PI-1 – all had a bell-shaped expression level pattern, where expression levels first increased from 6 h to 24 or 48 h after inoculation, and then decreased until 96 h. For all three genes, the inoculation treatment in interaction with the time since inoculation significantly affected the expression level (AOS: χ2 = 69.5, df = 10, P < 0.001; JAZ2: χ2 = 184, df = 10, P < 0.001; PI-1: χ2 = 182, df = 10, P < 0.001; Fig. 4, Table S4–6). The expression of AOS was maximal 24 h after inoculation in the OsF and OsM treatments, and was higher in the OsF treatment compared to the OsM treatment from 12 to 24 h after inoculation, while the expression level in the OsF and OsM treatments was higher than in control from 6 to 72 h after inoculation. Similarly, the expression of JAZ2 was highest in the OsF and OsM treatments 24 h after inoculation, but was higher in the OsM than in the OsF treatment and in the OsF treatment than in the control from 12 to 48 h after inoculation. Finally, the expression level of PI-1 was highest 48 h after inoculation, and it was higher in the OsF than in the OsM treatment from 6 to 48 h after inoculation, while it was higher in the OsM treatment than in the control from 12 to 48 h after inoculation. Also, 96 h after inoculation, the expression level of PI-1 was lower in both the OsF and OsM treatments compared to the control.
Discussion
Orius sauteri has been widely used as a biological control agent in China against thrips (Mouden et al. 2017; Reitz et al. 2022; Di et al. 2022). However, whether its oviposition behaviour—the insertion of eggs into plant tissues—activates plant defences has rarely been studied. Here, we found that the pre-inoculation of both O. sauteri females and males on tomato plants reduced the fitness of F. occidentalis, both in the laboratory (reduced survival and fecundity) and in greenhouse conditions (reduced population densities) with a bigger effect of females pre-inoculation. This is likely related to O. sauteri oviposition behaviour compared to the feeding-only activity of male adults. The transcriptome analysis confirmed this hypothesis, indicating that only female pre-inoculation activated the MAPK signalling pathway, plant hormone signal transduction, and plant-pathogen interaction of defence-related KEGG pathways. This highlights the mechanism at stake, where O. sauteri oviposition activity induces plant defence, in turn reducing F. occidentalis fitness.
The pre-inoculation of O. sauteri females significantly reduced the survival rate of F. occidentalis, whereas males did not. Pre-inoculation of both O. sauteri females and males significantly lowered the F1 nymph number of F. occidentalis, although the effect from females was larger. Similarly, Pappas et al. (2015) reported that tomato plants punctured with M. pygmaeus, a zoophytophagous predator that depends on plants for survival, significantly reduced the survival rate and egg number of T. urticae pests. Compared to the control plants, M. pygmaeus-punctured sweet pepper plants significantly reduced the survival rate of T. urticae and reproduction of F. occidentalis and T. urticae (Zhang et al. 2018), which is consistent with the findings of our study.
Here we found that female but not male pre-inoculation treatments significantly repelled F. occidentalis females. This may be due to the induced plant defence response caused by O. sauteri oviposition activity, cascading to the emission of associated volatile organic compounds which may repel F. occidentalis. Indeed, Bouagga et al. (2018b) found that sweet pepper plants punctured by O. laevigatus were significantly less appealing to F. occidentalis and B. tabaci because of the release of terpenoids and green leaf volatiles through the activation of the JA and SA pathways. Similarly, De Puysseleyr et al. (2010) specifically found that the oviposition behaviour but not plant feeding of O. laevigatus females reduced damage caused by F. occidentalis on tomato plants. The reduced attractiveness of host plants to pests after oviposition in plant tissues has also been demonstrated for mirid bugs, which activated the JA and ABA plant defence pathways both via oviposition and plant feeding (Pérez-Hedo et al. 2018, 2021; Bouagga et al. 2018a; Zhang et al. 2019).
The induction of plant defences through O. sauteri oviposition could have biocontrol implications through bottom-up effects regulating pest populations, but also through top-down effects if plant defence priming affects the attraction of other natural enemies (Han et al. 2022; Liu et al. 2022). Here, we found that tomato plants pre-inoculated with O. sauteri females had significantly lower F. occidentalis population densities compared to plants pre-inoculated with O. sauteri males and to control plants at the population density peak in 2020 and 2021 in the field. Similarly, Dahmane et al. (2022) found that compared to the control, citrus plants pre-infested with Pilophorus clavatus (Hemiptera: Miridae) significantly reduced numbers of T. urticae from seven day after T. urticae release. The differences between females and male treatments observed here may be due to the oviposition behaviour of O. sauteri females and similar to results from the laboratory experiment of F. occidentalis performance. In particular, key genes of the JA signalling pathway, including PI-1, were upregulated by O. sauteri female inoculation. Protease inhibitors are important end products of the JA pathway, and may be the direct cause of F. occidentalis reduced fitness (Takahashi et al. 2007; Zhang and Zhang 2022).
In total, 35,096 transcripts were detected in the different O. sauteri treatments. Genes involved in plant defence mechanisms were significantly upregulated in tomato plants inoculated with female adults of O. sauteri, which is consistent with an accrued role of oviposition behaviour in plant defence induction. The 726 upregulated genes were found in OsF plants compared to control plants, while only 44 were upregulated in OsM plans compared to control plants. The three upregulated KEGG pathways in OsF plants—MAPK signalling, plant-plant hormone signal transduction, and plant-pathogen interaction—regulate and activate plant defence mechanisms together against herbivore and pathogen attacks (Takahashi et al. 2007; Wu et al. 2007; Hettenhausen et al. 2015; Zhang and Zhang 2022). Following plant attack by herbivores, the MAPK signalling pathway is activated, which in turn alters the levels of the phytohormones JA and ET, reshaping the transcriptome, and thus, activating defence responses against herbivore attacks (Hettenhausen et al. 2015; Meza-Canales et al. 2017; Sözen et al. 2020). Investigating the links between MAPK and JA activation in the current system should help further understand plant defence induction, and the consequences on reduced pest fitness.
Previous studies have shown that plants punctured with zoophytophagous predators induced plant defence responses by activating plant hormone signalling pathways such as JA, SA, and ABA, thus reducing the fitness of pests (Pérez-Hedo et al. 2021, 2022). In this study, only the JA signalling pathway was significantly upregulated by O. sauteri oviposition behaviour. While the number of eggs of O. sauteri inserted into tomato plant tissues increased linearly with time, the relative expression levels of AOS, JAZ2, and PI-1, i.e. key genes of the JA pathway, first increased until 24–48 h and then decreased with an increase in the duration of O. sauteri inoculation. Such short-time, bell-shaped gene expression change is evidence for the induction of plant defences, which happens over the short-term following plant tissue damage (Guo et al. 2019). It would be interesting to further investigate how the intensity of egg laying (number of eggs) matches the intensity of plant defence induction.
In the present study, we found that only O. sauteri female oviposition behaviour induced a significant plant defence response via the JA signalling pathway, although male feeding-only behaviour also induced a weaker plant defence response. This indirect, plant-mediated interaction by O. sauteri females on F. occidentalis could be exploited for the integrated pest management of F. occidentalis. Beyond the release of mass-reared natural enemies, other ecological interactions between plants, pests and natural enemies such as bottom-up effects through the induction of plant defences and alteration of plant perception by pests can offer interesting avenues to facilitate the regulation of pest populations. Here we showed that O. sauteri oviposition behaviour reduces F. occidentalis fitness. To develop new IPM tools, it would be useful to investigate the relative effects of plant feeding and oviposition by natural enemies versus by pests in other crop plants, to highlight processes beneficial to pest control.
Author contributions
ND, ND, and SW designed the assay; ZZ, YG, JL and EZ conducted the experiments; ZZ, ND, CCJ and SW analysed the data; ZZ, ZX, SW, CCJ and ND wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Bai Y, Yang C, Halitschke R, Paetz C, Kessler D, Burkard K, Gaquerel E, Baldwin IT, Li D (2022) Natural history-guided omics reveals plant defensive chemistry against leafhopper pests. Science 375:6580. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm2948
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bouagga S, Urbaneja A, Rambla JL, Flors V, Granell A, Jaques JA, Pérez-Hedo M (2018a) Zoophytophagous mirids provide pest control by inducing direct defences, antixenosis and attraction to parasitoids in sweet pepper plants. Pest Manag Sci 74:1286–1296. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4838
Bouagga S, Urbaneja A, Rambla JL, Granell A, Pérez-Hedo M (2018b) Orius laevigatus strengthens its role as a biological control agent by inducing plant defenses. J Pest Sci 91:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-017-0886-4
Chen H, Chen C, Huang S, Zhao M, Wang T, Jiang T et al (2023) Inactivation of RPX1 in Arabidopsis confers resistance to Plutella xylostella through the accumulation of the homoterpene DMNT. Plant Cell Environ 46:946–961. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14528
Cruz-Miralles J, Cabedo-López M, Guzzo M, Pérez-Hedo M, Flors V, Jaques JA (2021) Plant defense responses triggered by phytoseiid predatory mites (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) are species-specific, depend on plant genotype and may not be related to direct plant feeding. Biocontrol 66:381–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-021-10077-8
Cruz-Miralles J, Cabedo-López M, Guzzo M, Vacas S, Navarro-Llopis V, Ibáñez-Gual MV et al (2022) Host plant scent mediates patterns of attraction/repellence among predatory mites. Entomol Gen 42:217–229. https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2021/1237
Dahmane M, Urbaneja A, Ruíz-Rivero O, Alonso-Valiente M, Pérez-Hedo M (2022) The zoophytophagous predator Pilophorus clavatus (Hemiptera: Miridae) induces plant defences in citrus. J Pest Sci 95:1519–1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-022-01558-5
De Puysseleyr V, Höfte M, De Clercq P (2010) Ovipositing Orius laevigatus increase tomato resistance against Frankliniella occidentalis feeding by inducing the wound response. Arthropod Plant Interactions 5:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-010-9117-0
Depalo L, Urbaneja A, Gallego C, Fournarakos A, Alonso M, et al (2022) Eliciting sweet pepper plant resistance to Aulacorthum solani and attractiveness on Aphelinus abdominalis by exposure to (Z)-3-hexenyl propanoate. Entomol Gen 42:743–749. https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2022/1595
Desneux N, O’Neil RJ, Yoo HJS (2006) Suppression of population growth of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura, by predators: the identification of a key predator and the effects of prey dispersion, predator abundance, and temperature. Environ Entomol 35:1342–1349. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/35.5.1342
Di N, Zhu Z, Harwood JD, Xu Z, Wang S, Desneux N (2022) Fitness of Frankliniella occidentalis and Bemisia tabaci on three plant species pre-inoculated by Orius sauteri. J Pest Sci 95:1531–1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-022-01543-y
Dicke M, Baldwin IT (2010) The evolutionary context for herbivore-induced plant volatiles: beyond the ‘cry for help.’ Trends Plant Sci 15:167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.12.002
Ding HY, Lin YY, Tuan SJ, Tang LC, Chi H, Atlihan R et al (2021) Integrating demography, predation rate, and computer simulation for evaluation of Orius strigicollis as biological control agent against Frankliniella intonsa. Entomol Gen 41:79–196. https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2020/1082
Erb M, Reymond P (2019) Molecular interactions between plants and insect herbivores. Annu Rev Plant Biol 70:527–557. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-095910
Erb M, Meldau S, Howe GA (2012) Role of phytohormones in insect specific plant reactions. Trends Plant Sci 17:250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.01.003
Erb M, Züst T, Robert CAM (2021) Using plant chemistry to improve interactions between plants, herbivores and their natural enemies: challenges and opportunities. Curr Opin Biotech 70:262–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2021.05.011
Guo J, Qi J, He K, Wu J, Bai S, Zhang T, Zhao J, Wang Z (2019) The Asian corn borer Ostrinia furnacalis feeding increases the direct and indirect defence of mid-whorl stage commercial maize in the field. Plant Biotech J 17:88–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12949
Han P, Lavoir AV, Rodriguez-Saona C, Desneux N (2022) Bottom-up forces in agroecosystems and their potential impact on arthropod pest management. Annu Rev Entomol 67:239–259. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-060121-060505
Hartig F (2022)DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-Level / Mixed) Regression Models. R package version 0.4.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DHARMa
Hettenhausen C, Schuman MC, Wu J (2015) MAPK signaling: a key element in plant defense response to insects. Insect Sci 22:157–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12128
Hilker M, Fatouros NE (2015) Plant responses to insect egg deposition. Annu Rev Entomol 60:493–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020620
Ibanez F, Suh JH, Wang Y, Rivera M, Setamou M, Stelinski LL (2022) Salicylic acid mediated immune response of Citrus sinensis to varying frequencies of herbivory and pathogen inoculation. BMC Plant Biol 22:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03389-5
Lenth R (2023) Emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.8.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
Li R, Jin J, Xu J, Wang L, Li J, Lou Y, Baldwin IT (2021) Long non-coding RNAs associate with jasmonate-mediated plant defence against herbivores. Plant Cell Environ 44:982–994. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13952
Li X, Zhang J, Lin S, Xing Y, Zhang X, Ye M et al (2022) (+)-Catechin, epicatechin and epigallocatechin gallate are important inducible defensive compounds against Ectropis grisescens in tea plants. Plant Cell Environ 45:496–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14216
Liu H, Su XY, Sun Z, Wang C, Shi JH, Foba CN, Jin H, Wang MQ (2022) Nitrogen and plant pathogens alter rice plant volatiles mediating host location behavior of Nilaparvata lugens and its parasitoid Anagrus nilaparvatae. Entomol Gen 42:549–557. https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2022/1281
Liu X, Wang Y, Liu H, Huang X, Qian L, Yang B, Xu Y, Chen F (2023) Enhanced β-glucosidase in Western flower thrips affects its interaction with the redox-based strategies of kidney beans under elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environ 46:918–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14534
Lundgren JG, Fergen JK, Riedell WE (2008) The influence of plant anatomy on oviposition and reproductive success of the omnivorous bug Orius insidiosus. Anim Behav 75:1495–1502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.029
McCormick AC, Unsicker SB, Gershenzon J (2012) The specificity of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in attracting herbivore enemies. Trends Plant Sci 17:303–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.03.012
Meza-Canales ID, Meldau S, Zavala JA, Baldwin IT (2017) Herbivore perception decreases photosynthetic carbon assimilation and reduces stomatal conductance by engaging 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid, mitogen-activated protein kinase 4 and cytokinin perception. Plant Cell Environ 40:1039–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12874
Mithöfer A, Boland W (2012) Plant defense against herbivores: chemical aspects. Annu Rev Plant Biol 3:431–450. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103854
Mouden S, Sarmiento KF, Klinkhamer PG, Leiss KA (2017) Integrated pest management in western flower thrips: past, present and future. Pest Manag Sci 3:813–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4531
Munawar A, Zhang Y, Zhong J, Ge Y, Abou El-Ela AS, Mao Z et al (2022) Heat stress affects potato’s volatile emissions that mediate agronomically important trophic interactions. Plant Cell Environ 45:3036–3051. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14416
Pappas ML, Steppuhn A, Geuss D, Topalidou N, Zografou A, Sabelis MW et al (2015) Beyond predation: the zoophytophagous predator Macrolophus pygmaeus induces tomato resistance against spider mites. PLoS ONE 10:e0127251
Pearse IS, LoPresti E, Schaeffer RN, Wetzel WC, Mooney KA, Ali JG et al (2020) Generalising indirect defence and resistance of plants. Ecol Lett 23:1137–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13512
Pérez-Hedo M, Arias-Sanguino ÁM, Urbaneja A (2018) Induced tomato plant resistance against Tetranychus urticae triggered by the phytophagy of Nesidiocoris tenuis. Frontiers Plant Sci 9:1419. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01419
Pérez-Hedo M, Alonso-Valiente M, Vacas S, Gallego C, Rambla JL, Navarro-Llopis V, Granell A, Urbaneja A (2021) Eliciting tomato plant defenses by exposure to herbivore induced plant volatiles. Entomol Gen 41:209–218. https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2021/1196
Pérez-Hedo M, Bouagga S, Zhang NX, Moerkens R, Messelink G, Jaques JA et al (2022) Induction of plant defenses: the added value of zoophytophagous predators. J Pest Sci 95:1501–1517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-022-01506-3
R Core Team (2023) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org
Ragsdale DW, Landis DA, Brodeur J, Heimpel GE, Desneux N (2011) Ecology and management of the soybean aphid in North America. Annu Rev Entomol 56:375–399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144755
Reitz SR, Gao Y, Kirk WDJ, Hoddle MS, Leiss K, Funderburk JE (2022) Invasion biology, ecology, and management of western flower thrips. Annu Rev Entomol 65:17–37. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-024947
Ren X, Huang J, Li X, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Chen L et al (2022) Frozen lepidopteran larvae as promising alternative factitious prey for rearing of Orius species. Entomol Gen 42:959–966. https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2022/1579
Schuman MC, Baldwin IT (2016) The layers of plant responses to insect herbivores. Annu Rev Entomol 61:373–394. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-010715-023851
Sözen C, Schenk ST, Boudsocq M, Chardin C, Almeida-Trapp M, Krapp A et al (2020) Wounding and insect feeding trigger two independent MAPK pathways with distinct regulation and kinetics. Plant Cell 32:1988–2003. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.19.00917
Sun X, Sun Y, Ma L, Liu Z, Zhang C, Huang W, Siemann E, Ding J (2022) Linking aboveground and belowground interactions via herbivore-induced plant volatiles. Entomol Gen 42:421–429. https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2022/1344
Takahashi F, Yoshida R, Ichimura K, Mizoguchi T, Seo S, Yonezawa M et al (2007) The mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade MKK3-MPK6 is an important part of the jasmonate signal transduction pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 9:805–818. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.106.046581
Turlings TCJ, Erb M (2018) Tritrophic interactions mediated by herbivore-induced plant volatiles: mechanisms, ecological relevance, and application potential. Annu Rev Entomol 63:433–452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043507
Wang S, Michaud JP, Zhang F (2014) Comparative suitability of aphids, thrips and mites as prey for the flower bug Orius sauteri (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Eur J Entomol. 111:221–226. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2014.031
Wang SX, Di N, Chen X, Zhang F, Biondi A, Desneux N, Wang S (2018) Life history and functional response to prey density of the flower bug Orius sauteri attacking the fungivorous sciarid fly Lycoriella pleuroti. J Pest Sci 92:715–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-018-1032-7
Wang J, Wu D, Wang Y, Xie D (2019) Jasmonate action in plant defense against insects. J Exp Bot 70:3391–3400. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz174
Wu J, Baldwin IT (2010) New insights into plant responses to the attack from insect herbivores. Annu Rev Genet 44:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-102209-163500
Wu J, Hettenhausen C, Meldau S, Baldwin IT (2007) Herbivory rapidly activates MAPK signaling in attacked and unattacked leaf regions but not between leaves of Nicotiana attenuata. Plant Cell 19:1096–1122. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.106.049353
Xu XN, Enkegaard A (2009) Prey preference of Orius sauteri between western flower thrips and spider mites. Entomol Exp Appl 132:93–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2009.00867.x
Ye J, Zhang L, Zhang X, Wu X, Fang R (2021) Plant defense networks against insect-borne pathogens. Trends Plant Sci 26:272–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2020.10.009
Zhang M, Zhang S (2022) Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plant signaling. J Integr Plant Biol 64:301–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13215
Zhang NX, Messelink GJ, Alba JM, Schuurink RC, Kant MR, Janssen A (2018) Phytophagy of omnivorous predator Macrolophus pygmaeus affects performance of herbivores through induced plant defences. Oecologia 186:101–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-4000-7
Zhang NX, van Wieringen D, Messelink GJ, Janssen A (2019) Herbivores avoid host plants previously exposed to their omnivorous predator Macrolophus pygmaeus. J Pest Sci 92:737–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-018-1036-3
Zhang NX, Stephan JG, Björkman C, Puentes A (2021) Global change calls for novel plant protection: reviewing the potential of omnivorous plant-inhabiting arthropods as predators and plant defence inducers. Curr Opin Insect Sci 47:103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2021.06.001
Zhao J, Guo XJ, Tan XJ, Desneux N, Zappala L, Zhang F, Wang S (2017) Using Calendula officinalis as a floral resource to enhance aphid and thrips suppression by the flower bug Orius sauteri (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Pest Manag Sci 73:515–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4474
Funding
This work was supported by Beijing Innovation Team of the Modern Agricultural Research System (BAIC08-2023-YJ02), and by the Technology Innovation Programme of Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (KJCX20210402, KJCX20230417, KJCX20230115).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. Nicolas Desneux serves as Editor-in-Chief of Journal of Pest Science and was not involved in the review process and decisions related to this manuscript.
Additional information
Communicated by Cesar Rodriguez-Saona.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, Z., Jaworski, C.C., Gao, Y. et al. Host plants benefit from non-predatory effects of zoophytophagous predators against herbivores. J Pest Sci (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-024-01749-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-024-01749-2