Introduction

According to the World Health Organization [1] about 500 million new cases of spinal cord injury (SCI) occur every year. The disconnection of processing and bundles of nerve fibers responsible for descending communication on the spinal cord result in sensory and motor impairment as well as autonomic control impairment of internal organs such as the heart [2].

Heart rate variability (HRV) is considered a tool with great potential to quantify the residual cardiovascular sympathovagal regulation after SCI [3] and was highly reproducible in this population [4]. Studies have shown that cardiovascular sympathetic control in SCI above spinal segment T6 is impaired or even absent [3, 510]. Consequently, cardiovascular disorders may occur such as: reduced heart rate variability (HRV), low frequency power (LF), RR intervals, delay cardiac baroreflex [11], bradycardia, arterial hypotension, and autonomic dysreflexia [5].

Although sympathetic innervation is preserved in SCI below T6, there may be autonomic control disorders, such as decreased high frequency power (HF) [11] and lower square root of the mean of the sum of the squares of differences between adjacent NN intervals (rMSSD) [12].

Previous studies on cardiovascular autonomic modulation in individuals who have suffered SCI used smaller samples, n = 1 [5] and n = 26 [6], evaluated only quadriplegics [10] or only paraplegics [13, 14]. Moreover, for HRV analysis, some authors used only linear methods [3, 6, 9, 11] considered inadequate to analyze signs with nonlinear behavior such as HRV [15]. Therefore, additional information is required which can be used as the basis for future experimental studies that address, for example, preventive sports programs for cardiovascular disease in this population.

The autonomic control disorders associated with paralysis and hence to a sedentary lifestyle result in increased morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease in individuals with SCI [8, 12]. Early detection and characterization of autonomic dysfunction in individuals with SCI are extremely relevant for determining treatment. According to Myers et al. [16], the degree of autonomic dysfunction is an important indicator of physical functions and general health in a person with SCI.

Therefore, the objectives of this study were to explore the differences in cardiovascular autonomic modulation between individuals with and without SCI, analyze the autonomic behavior in people with SCI above and below T6, and identify which of the HRV parameters evaluated are more sensitive in detecting abnormalities in individuals with SCI.

Methods

This clinical trial, a controlled cross-sectional study, was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees of Universidade do Vale do Paraíba (UNIVAP), number 18353613.0.0000.5503, and registered in the Clinical Trials, protocol number NCT02177929. The subjects read and signed the informed consent.

Subjects

The study included 60 subjects, divided equally into two groups: control group (CG) consisting of individuals without neurological affections, and spinal cord injury Group (SCIG), made up of individuals with traumatic SCI. The SCIG was subdivided into two groups: a group of individuals with SCI above spinal segment T6—SCIG (above T6) and a group of individuals with SCI below T6—SCIG (below T6). To determine the level of spinal cord injury, individuals previously undergone a physical examination based on the evaluation of dermatomes and myotomes established by the American Spinal Injury Association.

Inclusion criteria were: age between 18 and 50, this age group was chosen because previous epidemiological studies of patients who have suffered LM in the region used subjects from 20 to 40 years [17] and 18 to 74 years [18]; therefore, this strategy would facilitate the selection of the sample. Other inclusion criteria considered included no cardiovascular abnormalities, or risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, or obesity, or use of cardiac depressant or stimulatory medications. The group of people with SCI had complete or incomplete thoracic or cervical SCI, clinical stability and more than 8 months after injury. By this time, type I and type II muscle fiber atrophy was considered to have occur 7–8 months after LM [19], and spasticity is usually established 2–6 months after injury [20].

Exclusion criteria were athletes and pregnant women. The group with SCI also could not have urine infection or severe pressure ulcers.

Subjects were classified as sedentary if they practiced physical activity for 2 h or less per week and active if they practiced 3 or more hours per week [13].

The study sample was composed mostly of males, which reduced the interference of hormonal changes of the menstrual cycle on the cardiovascular autonomic control. According to Yildirir et al. [21] and Sato et al. [22], the LF power and LF/HF ratio are higher in the luteal phase, indicating increased sympathetic activity at this stage of the menstrual cycle, while in the follicular phase, the HF power is greater, indicating increased parasympathetic activity at this stage.

The study sample is characterized in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of individuals from groups: control (CG), spinal cord injury (SCIG), spinal cord injury above T6—SCIG (above T6), and spinal cord injury below T6—SCIG (below T6)

ECG data acquisition

All subjects were evaluated by HRV. For this, the intervals between R waves of the electrocardiogram (RRi) so-called normal-to-normal (NN) intervals were obtained by a Polar® RS800CX with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz [23].

The strap heart monitor was positioned below the pectoral muscle of individuals who remained seated during collection. Data collection was performed for 7 min, preceded by at least 2 min of rest. The subjects were instructed to breathe spontaneously throughout the procedure. The sitting position was chosen because, due to the extensive functional loss after SCI, affected individuals use a wheelchair and remain in the seated position most of the time [13].

Data analysis

The acquired data were transferred to a microcomputer equipped with Polar ProTrainer software. First, to remove artifacts, signals were filtered using an automatic adaptive filter, developed by Santos et al. [23]. The filter is based on the adaptation of the average and standard deviation values, following the series without interfering variability in the characteristics of the data. Subsequently, the signals were analyzed by linear (time domain and frequency) and nonlinear (Poincaré plot, and sample entropy) methods, using Kubios HRV Analysis® software.

For temporal analysis, the following variables were obtained: RRi; standard deviation of the NN intervals (SDNN), which represent the sympathetic and parasympathetic modulation; square root of the mean squares differences of successive NN intervals (rMSSD); and number of pairs of adjacent NN intervals differing by more than 50 ms (pNN50). The latter two indices are related to the parasympathetic modulation [24].

For spectral analysis, Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) was used to obtain the variables: low frequency power (LF: 0.04–0.15 Hz) which for some authors is related only to sympathetic modulation [25] and for others is both sympathetic and parasympathetic activity [26]; high frequency (HF: 0.15–0.4 Hz) representing the parasympathetic activity; and LF/HF ratio which is related to the sympathovagal balance. The LF and HF power were expressed in both absolute (ms2) and normalized units (n.u.). Normalized units are obtained by dividing the power of a given component (LF or HF) by the total power minus the VLF power.

Using Poincaré plot, the standard deviation of short-term HRV (SD1), and the standard deviation of long-term HRV (SD2) were obtained. Furthermore, the Poincare map allows visual analysis which summarizes the short and long-term levels of the series of RR intervals in a figure. This map consists of plotting each RR interval in relation to the next interval to produce a set of coordinate points (RRi, RRi + 1) [27].

Analysis by sample entropy (SampEn) indicates the complexity and irregularity of the RRi time series. The length (m) of the subseries and the tolerance (r) were fixed at m = 2 and r = 0.2 [28]. This type of entropy was chosen because of its better performances on short-term time series data [29]. The complexity of heart rate (HR) by entropy can be a general marker of sympathovagal interaction; therefore, its increase reflects an improvement in the sympathovagal balance [30].

The first 2 min was excluded from the time series. The analysis was performed with the last 5 min, which for the Task Force [30] is suitable for short recording time.

Statistical analysis

Data normality was verified using the D’Agostino test and extreme value. To compare the averages of the parameters between the CG and SCIG, Student’s t test or the Mann–Whitney was used. To compare the averages of the parameters between the CG, SCIG (above T6), and SCIG (below T6), the ANOVA test or Kruskal–Wallis test was used. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. In addition, the degree of correlation of the parameters evaluated between the CG and SCIG was assessed by the Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences between groups for the evaluated physical characteristics (age, weight, height, and BMI).

Comparisons of the means of HRV parameters evaluated between the CG and SCIG showed a statistically significant difference for most parameters, except for SDNN and SD2. The SCIG had significantly lower rMSSD, pNN50, SD1, and HF in ms2 or in n.u., which reflect the parasympathetic activity. The LF power was significantly lower in ms2 and n.u. It was significantly higher in the SCIG compared to CG. The LF/HF ratio was significantly higher, and sample entropy (SampEn) was significantly lower in the SCIG compared to the GG (Table 2).

Table 2 Amounts in mean and standard error of the HRV parameters analyzed in the time domain, frequency domain, and nonlinear methods, as well as p values for parameters of the means of comparison between the control (CG) and spinal cord injury (SCIG) groups

Comparisons of the means of HRV parameters evaluated between CG, SCIG (above T6), and SCIG (below T6) revealed that the differences between the CG and SCIG were attributed mainly to the SCIG (above T6) groups, as shown in Figs. 1, 2, and 3.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Box plots of the mean and standard deviation of the parameters analyzed in the time domain for the control (CG), spinal cord injury above T6—SCIG (above T6), and spinal cord injury below T6—SCIG (below T6) groups, and p value

Fig. 2
figure 2

Box plots of the mean and standard deviation of the parameters analyzed in the frequency domain for the control (CG), spinal cord injury above T6—SCIG (above T6), and spinal cord injury below T6—SCIG (below T6) groups, and p value

Fig. 3
figure 3

Box plots of the mean and standard deviation of the parameters analyzed by nonlinear methods to the control (CG), spinal cord injury above T6—SCIG (above T6), and spinal cord injury below T6—SCIG (below T6) groups, and p value

The visual analysis of Poincaré plot shows a growing dispersion of SCIG (above T6) to CG (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Examples of the Poincaré plot of an individual from each group: control—CG, spinal cord injury above T6—SCIG (above T6), and spinal cord injury below T6—SCIG (below T6)

Pearson’s test showed very low correlation values between the evaluated parameters for CG and SCIG, demonstrating that there is no correlation between evaluated parameters (Table 3).

Table 3 Pearson’s test correlation values between the parameters evaluated for the groups: CG and SCIG, r = coefficient of Pearson and CI = confidence interval for the 0.05 significance level

Discussion

The results showed an LF power in ms2 lower in the SCIG compared to control. Comparisons of the averages of the parameters evaluated between CG, SCIG (above T6), and SCIG (below T6) revealed that this difference was attributed, especially in the SCIG (above T6), who showed lower LF power (ms2), which reflects in lower sympathetic activity. This finding corroborates that of Malmqvist et al. [3]; Oh and Eun [5]; Jan et al. [6]; Caldeira et al. [7]; Krassioukov [8]; Inoue et al. [9], who found that a reduction of LF, especially in the SCI above T6, and assign this to interruption of neuronal pathways that connect the supraspinatus command to the cardiovascular peripheral sympathetic control.

However, the LF power in n.u. was higher in the SCIG compared to control, and similarly, the means of comparison of the parameters measured between the CG, SCIG (above T6), and SCIG (below T6) revealed that difference was attributed mainly to the SCIG (above T6). Similar results were not found in the literature. However, when performing normalization of spectral powers removed the influence of the very low frequency (VLF) power, which for Delaney et al. [31] is associated with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and thermoregulatory mechanisms, sometimes altered in people with SCI [32, 33].

In people with SCI, especially above T6, control of blood pressure is extremely dependent on high levels of plasma renin. In these people, the renin levels increase much more and faster in response to a postural change from the supine to the standing position compared to control. In this case, renin release ceases to be mediated by the sympathetic nervous system and becomes dependent on renal baroreceptors [3436]. Due to the elevation in plasma rennin activity, there is a late rise in plasma aldosterone [36].

Corroborating this finding, a study by Kawasaki et al. [37] showed in SCI patients na attenuated increase in plasma adrenaline and an increase in plasma aldosterone during exercise compared with controls. These findings suggested that this could be because of adaptation to a disordered sympathetic nervous system.

Moreover, in SCI above T6, more than half the body loses the hypothalamic-friendly descendant control responsible for thermoregulatory mechanisms such as poikilothermia (inability to maintain a constant core temperature), piloerection, tremor, peripheral vasoconstriction and cutaneous heat or sweating, cutaneous vasodilation to reduce the temperature, which can cause severe thermal dysfunction. This is largely due to reduced sensory input to thermo-regulating centers and the loss of sympathetic control of temperature and sweat regulation below the level of injury [33, 38]. Although thermoregulation is recognized as an autonomic function, the precise mechanisms of dysregulation have not been fully elucidated [39].

Therefore, the increase in LF power in n.u. SCIG can reflect the great influence of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the thermoregulatory mechanisms, showing that this power not only reflects the sympathetic activity in people with SCI. The physiological effects of SCI on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and thermoregulatory mechanisms and its influence on the components of HRV require additional investigation.

In addition, greater LF/HF ratio and lower sample entropy (SampEn) were found in SCIG, especially in SCIG (above T6), which represent an impaired sympathovagal balance [15, 40]. These results corroborate Inoue et al. [9], who found a LF/HF ratio higher in quadriplegic patients compared to the control. The higher the value of this ratio, the greater the sympathetic predominance [26], but as SCI above T6 is sympathetic interruption, one should be cautious about interpreting this parameter for this population.

The results also showed reduced parasympathetic activity in SCIG (rMSSD, pNN50, SD1, and HF in ms2 or n.u.) compared to CG. According to Inoue et al. [9], the reduction of HF power may offset the lack of sympathetic activity. A study by Aysin and Aysin [41] showed a predominance of parasympathetic activity during deep breathing. Because quadriplegics with SCI below C5 have shallow breathing due to respiratory muscle weakness, as the intercostal, this can influence the spectral power of the HF power [9].

The data from this study corroborate Claydon and Krassioukov [11] and Bunten et al. [42], who found in individuals with SCI sympathetic and parasympathetic neurocardiac impairment, which is more in cervical SCI and minimum in thoracic and lumbar SCI. Similarly, our data show similarities with the studies of Caldeira et al. [7] in tetraplegics and Serra-Año et al. [13] in paraplegics.

Serra-Año et al. [13] believe that parasympathetic cardiac autonomic dysfunction in people with SCI below T6 can occur due to immobility, associated with impairment of the venous pump of the paralyzed muscles, which is associated with confinement in a wheelchair and a sedentary lifestyle.

For Claydom and Krassioukov [11], the abnormal cardiovascular regulation post-SCI is related to the level of the injury and severity of the autonomic pathways. According to Jan et al., in cervical or high-thoracic (above T6) SCI, the cardiovascular system loses sympathetic innervation. However, the results of this study show that the components that reflect the sympathetic modulation (LF, SD2) have not disappeared in SCIG (above T6), even in complete injuries. These findings corroborate those from Claydom and Krassioukov [11], who highlighted some hypotheses: the sympathetic oscillations can occur even in the absence of downward sympathetic control from spinal sympathetic neurons; the LF component may be mediated by parasympathetic mechanisms; and the destruction of sympathetic descending pathways may have been incomplete. This shows that the level of sensory and motor damage may not correspond to the level of autonomic injury.

The Poincaré figures allow a better view of the differences between individuals in CG, SCIG (above T6), and SCIG (below T6). They revealed an autonomic dysfunction present in an individual in the SCIG (above T6), as expected due to sympathetic denervation, but also showed an autonomic impairment in an individual in the SCIG (below T6). In addition, despite having no significant differences for most of the parameters evaluated between the CG and SCIG (below T6), RRi were lower in this group. In addition, there was a greater dispersion of the Poincaré plot in the CG, then the SCIG (below T6), and finally the SCIG (above T6). According to Serra-Año et al. [13], a greater dispersion of the points is related to a good autonomic balance, whereas a narrow dispersion indicates autonomic imbalance, usually associated with the predominance of sympathetic activity.

Studies have pointed out that some indexes of HRV can detect autonomic changes from SCI with better sensitivity and specificity. Significant results were found by Merati et al. [15], Millar et al. [28], and Agiovlasitis et al. [40] using nonlinear methods such as entropy, but without changes in linear measurements (LF, HF, and LF/HF). Therefore, the present study analyzed the HRV using linear and nonlinear methods. Unlike previous studies, significant differences were found between CG and SCIG for most of the evaluated parameters. In addition, the Pearson’s test correlation revealed very low levels of each of the parameters for CG and SCIG, suggesting that all linear (time and frequency domain) or nonlinear (Poincare plot and sample entropy) parameters can be used to demonstrate the differences in cardiovascular autonomic behavior in people with and without SCI.

Differences between the SCIG (above T6) and SCIG (below T6) show that during the clinical strategies in the cardiovascular rehabilitation programs, the decrease in sympathetic activity, especially in the SCIG (above T6), can lead to a difficulty in accelerating the HR during physical exertion, so this parameter is not the most appropriate in the prescription of exercises.

In addition, the literature shows that SCI was associated with significantly increased odds of heart attack, stroke [43], and type 2 diabetes, irrespective of known risk factors for type 2 diabetes [44]. The deregulation of the autonomic nerve system could be involved in the pathophysiology of these diseases. On the other hand, studies show the benefits of exercise training in people with SCI. Nash et al. [45] demonstrated that electrically stimulated physical training (1 month of electrical stimulation of the quadriceps and 6 months electrostimulation of quadriceps, hamstrings, and glutes associated with the cycle ergometer) can reverse left ventricular atrophy in tetraplegic individuals, and that the changes in cardiac architecture are likely to be the result of both pressure and volume challenge to the heart imposed by exercise.

Further studies should be carried out to define the physiological mechanisms of autonomic impairment after SCI, to identify the effects of different therapeutic interventions, such as sport, to enable greater security to conduct the rehabilitation process of affected individuals and establishment guidelines for prescription of exercise.

Conclusions

The SCIG showed less sympathetic (LF in ms2) and parasympathetic activity (rMSSD, pNN50, HF in ms2 or n.u., SD1) and consequently compromised sympathovagal balance (LF/HF, SampEn) compared to CG. These differences were attributed, particularly, in the SCIG (above T6). Moreover, the larger LF power in n.u. of the SCIG may reflect the influence of changes of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the thermoregulatory mechanisms.

The reduction of sympathetic activity may be related to the interruption of sympathetic pathways originating from spinal segments T1 to T5. The reduction in parasympathetic activity may be related to sedentary lifestyle acquired after SCI. Therefore, the SCIG (above T6) may present greater risk of morbidity and mortality by cardiovascular diseases. However, the SCIG (below T6) also presented some degree of autonomic dysfunction, such as shorter RRi and less dispersion in the Poincaré plot, which also deserves clinical attention.

All reviews, linear or nonlinear parameters were adequate to demonstrate the differences between the CG and SCIG, except for SDNN and SD2, which showed no significant differences between groups. Therefore, it was not possible to clearly identify which of the HRV parameters are more sensitive in detecting abnormalities in patients with SCI.