Introduction

In the South-east Asian tropical rain forest region, many families of trees flower and fruit almost simultaneously, approximately every 2–10 years (Appanah 1985, 1993; Ashton et al. 1988). This fruit-rich event is known as mast fruiting (hereinafter abbreviated as “MF”) event. Between MF events, frugivorous animals must survive a long fruit-scarce (non-MF) period. Wong et al. (2005) observed famine-like emaciation or death in the sun bear (Helarctos malayanus) and in bearded pigs (Sus barbatus) during the non-MF period in the lowland tropical rainforest of Sabah, Malaysia. Variation in food availability may cause behavioral changes in animals. Frugivorous animals are free from hunger during the MF period, which often continue for several months. Many studies have indicated that primate activity budgets vary seasonally in response to changes in the abundance, quality, or distribution of food resources (Altmann and Muruthi 1988; Doran 1997; Estrada et al. 1999; Hanya 2004; Isbell and Young 1993; Passamani 1998; Robinson 1986; Vasey 2005).

Gibbons (Family Hylobatidae) are arboreal apes restricted to the tropical and sub-tropical forests of Southeast Asia, South China, Bangladesh, and Northeast India. Gibbons usually live in a monogamous social system consisting of a mated pair and their offspring. Gibbons are frugivorous (Gittins and Raemaekers 1980; Leighton 1987). They eat mostly ripe fruits, including large amounts of figs, which provide a stable food source to meet their basic energy requirements (Elder 2009). Northern Gray gibbons are found in the northern and eastern regions of Borneo (Groves 1972; Marshall and Marshall 1976). The diet of Northern Gray gibbon (Hylobates funereus) in Kalimantan comprised 62% fruits (Leighton 1987), while that of Northern Gray gibbon in the Danum Valley Conservation Area comprised 60% fruits (Inoue et al. 2016). Gibbons eat more fruits when it is available (Chivers 1974; Ahsan 1994; Bricknell 1999), although they also consume young leaves, flowers, insects (Ahsan 1994; Chivers 1984; Bartlett 2007), and bird eggs (Carpenter 1940). Previous studies have shown that in Southeast Asia, figs fruit at regular intervals independent of mast-fruiting, and are often used as a fallback food for primates (e.g., Marshall et al. 2009). Figs are included in the percentage values of fruits shown here.

The daily path lengths of gibbons vary seasonally in response to the abundance of preferred food resources (Raemaekers 1980; Bricknell 1999; Bartlett 2009; Inoue et al. 2016). Gibbons arrive at the sleeping trees several hours before nightfall (Chivers 1974; Reichard 1998; Ahsan 2001; Cheyne 2010; Inoue et al. 2016).

When gibbons ate nutritionally high-quality fruit, their feeding time decreased and traveling time increased because fruit is sparsely distributed (Bach et al. 2017). When gibbons ate energy-poor leaves, they may spend less time singing and playing to conserve energy (Bartlett 1999; Bach et al. 2017). Social interactions such as grooming, playing, and singing increase when ripe fruit was abundant (Bartlett 2003; Fan et al. 2008). Social behavior, especially singing, requires energy. Studies in birds have shown that muscles associated with breathing control, the syrinx, the upper vocal tract, and bill movement are all used during singing (Goller and Larsen 1997; Suthers et al. 1999; Larsen and Goller 2002). Field observations of birds suggest that singing has an energy cost. Birds sing frequently when they are in good physical condition (Lambrechts 1996). Fruits are rich in sugar and gibbons get their energy quickly by eating fruits (Raemaekers 1978). Knott (1998) reported that the foods most commonly eaten by orangutans during the mast-fruiting season were high in calories. Gibbons may take in more energy during the MF period than during the non-MF period and use the extra energy for social interactions that require high energy.

We collected behavioral and acoustic data from two groups of gibbons at the Danum Valley Conservation Area (DVCA) from 2002 to 2020. We collected behavioral data and acoustic recordings while following the gibbon groups. During the study period, MF occurred in 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2019. Based on previous studies showing the difference in activity budget between high and low fruit abundance (Bartlett 1999, 2003; Fan et al. 2008; Bach et al. 2017), we hypothesized that Northern Gray gibbons would show seasonal variation in activity patterns according to the change in fruit abundance between specifically fruit-rich MF and non-MF periods. In addition, we hypothesized gibbons spend more time on energetically costly activities such as grooming, playing, and calling behaviors during the MF period than during the non-MF period. To test these hypotheses, we investigated their activity budget, daily travel distance, daily sleeping time, and daily song duration during both MF and non-MF periods.

Previous bird studies showed that the performance of the bird’s song reflects food availability. Supplementary fed birds increased song rate (Berg et al. 2005). Less-fed birds reduced song rate, an increased latency to sing, and a lowered song amplitude and fundamental frequency (Ritschard and Brumm 2012). Birds with a larger repertoire size have a higher field metabolic rate, which may indicate that a more complex song reflects an energetic cost (Garamszegi et al. 2006). Furthermore, some studies show that domesticated songbirds develop more complex songs compared to their wild conspecifics, because of the relaxing of selection pressures associated with domestication (Takahasi and Okanoya 2010; Kagawa et al. 2014; Okanoya 2017). As it is assumed that domestication and fruit-rich environments are similar in terms of a stable food supply, we hypothesized that gibbon songs become complex when fruits are abundant. To test this hypothesis, we examined whether song complexity changed between MF and non-MF periods.

The goal of this study was to examine how gibbons change activity patterns, especially social and calling behaviors, in response to the amount of energy obtained from abundant fruit or poor fruit. The DVCA in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo, where Northern Gray gibbons occur, provides an opportunity to assess this problem.

Methods

Study area and subjects

Gibbons are arboreal rainforest apes. Gibbons usually live in nuclear family groups, occupying a territory of between 20 to 100 hectares that they defend with vigorous visual and vocal displays (Cunningham and Mootnick 2009). Our study was conducted around the Borneo Rainforest Lodge (BRL) and the Danum Valley Field Center (DVFC) in the DVCA, located in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo (Fig. 1). This area consists mainly of primary rainforest. The Northern Gray gibbons we studied were members of two groups identified as SAPA and FC groups. The territory of the SAPA group is located near the Borneo Rainforest Lodge (BRL; 5° 01′ N, 117° 44′ E; elevation: ~ 190 m) and the territory of the FC group is located near the Danum Valley Field Center (DVFC; 5° 01′ N, 117° 48′ E; elevation: ~ 170 m). The DVFC is located 10 km southeast from the BRL (Fig. 1). Home range sizes of SAPA and FC groups were 34 ha and 35 ha, respectively. Boundary of home range was estimated from the cumulative day-range map of each group (Bartlett 2008). When we followed gibbon groups, we traced subject’s travel route on a map of the study site every 10 min, using a handheld global positioning system unit (Garmin GPSMAP 60CSx, Kansas City, USA). As neighbor groups were not habituated, we could not follow them. So, it was not clear how much home range overlapped with the neighboring groups. Thus, this home range approximation shows a total home range size including the overlap. The home ranges were estimated by using square-grid method. A grid with 100 m2 (10 m × 10 m) square cells was superimposed over the home range map, and the number of cells included in the area was counted. If more than one-half of any square was within the home range, we counted it as a full square, and if less than one-half of any square was within the home range, we ignored it. We collected activity data for three adult gibbons and two young gibbons: the SAPA adult male, the SAPA adolescent male, the FC adult male, the FC adult female, and the FC juvenile male. All gibbons were well habituated to humans. During our study period from 2002 to 2020, the SAPA group initially consisted of four individuals: an adult male, an adult female, a juvenile female, and an infant male. However, the adult female disappeared in April 2005, the subadult female left the SAPA group in October 2006, and the adolescent male died in April 2008. The SAPA adult male disappeared in August 2009; therefore, we used only using data from 2002 to 2009 for this group (Table 1). It was unclear why family members disappeared or died. Mast fruiting events occurred in 2005 and 2007 in this area (Kanamori et al. 2010). We studied the FC group from 2010 to 2020, which initially consisted of two individuals: an adult male and an adult female. During the study period, the pair had three offspring. However, two infants born in 2011 (January) and 2013 (June) disappeared in the successive years, in 2012 (August) and in 2014 (June) respectively. A third infant born in December 2015 was present until 2020 (Table 2). Mast fruiting events occurred in 2010 and 2019 in this area (Kanamori et al. 2017; Matsuzawa 2019).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Location of the Borneo Rainforest Lodge (BRL) and the Danum Valley Field Center (DVFC) in the Danum Valley Conservation Area, Sabah, Malaysia

Table 1 Group composition of the SAPA group, observation period, observation days, and the number of songs during MF and non-MF periods in our study
Table 2 Group composition of the FC group, observation period, observation days, and the number of songs during MF and non-MF periods in our study

Behavioral data collection

We collected activity data while following the two groups. With the aid of a field assistant, we conducted each survey over 5–9 successive days, 2–3 times a year. Behavioral observations were taken throughout full day follows by two people (Yoichi Inoue and a field assistant). Activity was focally observed. A scan sampling method at 10-min intervals was used to record the activity of gibbons from 0530 to 1600 h (Altmann 1974). For each observation sample, a 1-min scan was made recording the behavior of all visible members. Each individual was observed for 5 s, and its predominant behavior recorded. We recorded activity as either singing, moving, feeding (fig), feeding (non-fig fruit), feeding (leaves/flowers/others), playing, grooming, or resting. Infants and juveniles sometimes played by themselves, but we classified that as moving behavior. We classified playing behavior as that which occurred when two or more gibbons played together. Gibbons usually played by chasing or wrestling. We classified grooming behavior as that which occurred when two or more gibbons groomed each other. We classified self-grooming as that which occurred while at rest. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the proportion of playing and grooming behavior between MF and non-MF periods. We traced each focus subject’s travel route on a map of the study site every 10 min when following them, using a handheld global positioning system unit (Garmin GPSMAP 60CSx, Kansas City, USA). Travel distance and sleeping time (time of night-tree entry) were recorded as often as possible. Group travel routes were logged on a map of the study site by using a handheld GPS unit when following groups, and travel distances were measured using a digital curvimeter (COMCURVE-9JR Koizumi Sokki Mfg. Co., Ltd. Japan). Sleeping time was defined as the time at which the sleeping tree was entered. We recorded the time the subjects entered the sleeping tree and then continued to observe the group for at least 30 min until it went to sleep. At 0500 h the next morning, we went under the sleeping tree and observed the animals waking up to confirm their sleeping tree. Two-tailed t-tests were used to compare daily travel distance and daily sleeping time between MF and non-MF periods. We accumulated over 733 h (18 days during the MF period and 89 days during the non-MF period) of observations from 2002 to 2009 of the SAPA group and over 1085 h (30 days during the MF period and 139 days during the non-MF period) of observation from 2010 to 2020 of the FC group. Total observation days for activity budget, travel distance, and sleeping time are shown in Tables 1 and 2.

Acoustic data collection and statistical analysis

We started recording gibbon songs as soon as they started singing during the observation period. It allowed us to collect almost the complete song data. Gibbons sing species- and sex-specific songs (Marshall and Marshall 1976; Haimoff 1984). In the case of Northern Gray gibbons, males sing solo songs and mated pairs sing duets in a coordinated fashion (Haimoff 1985). We placed the recording device under the singing tree and attempted to record their songs as clearly as possible. We recorded songs using a digital audio recorder (R-09; Roland, Hamamatsu, Japan) with a microphone (ATM57; Audio-Technica, Tokyo, Japan). The recorder was set at a 44.1-kHz sampling rate and had 16-bit resolution. We measured the song duration through the recorded sound data. We converted the recorded sounds to spectrograms using Avisoft-SAS Lab Pro software (Avisoft, Berlin, Germany).

First, the sampling frequency was converted to 4000 Hz to allow focusing on the fundamental frequency for the on-screen measurements described below. Next, to remove ambient noise, we processed the sound through a high-pass filter to cut off sound at 500 Hz. Finally, spectrograms were created for on-screen measurements (settings: 256-point fast Fourier transformation and Hamming windows). We calculated daily male song duration and duet song duration from the spectrograms for each survey period (for example, survey periods in 2002 are August 2002 and December 2002), which is conducted 2–3 times a year, and used them for analysis. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare daily male song duration and daily duet song duration between MF and non-MF periods. The number of male songs and duet songs recorded are shown in Tables 1 and 2.

A male song is a succession of phrases (Haimoff 1984), and a phrase is a succession of notes. A note is the minimum unit of song. Most of the note intervals in our subject males’ songs were <2 s (90.7%). Therefore, we identified different phrases within a song as being separated by pauses greater than 2 s. Haimoff (1985) classified notes of male Northern Gray gibbon songs into five types: “wa,” “oo,” “oo-wa,” “quaver-type notes,” and “trill” notes. However, neither our subject male (the SAPA male) nor observed neighboring males sang “oo-wa” or “quaver-type” notes during our study. As the trills comprised a short set of “wa” notes, we classified male songs into two note types: “wa” and “oo” (Inoue et al. 2017). We classified two notes, wa” and “oo,” through not only spectrogram figures but also acoustic characteristics (Inoue et al. 2020). The mean start and end frequencies of “wa” notes were higher than those of “oo” notes. The start frequency and minimum frequency always coincided in “wa” notes. The end frequency and maximum frequency also always coincided in “wa” notes. The duration of “wa” notes was shorter than that of “oo” notes. The frequency range of “wa” notes was wider than that of “oo” notes. “Wa” notes were characterized by a fast frequency increase. In contrast, the frequency fluctuation of “oo” notes was relatively small. Phrases of the SAPA male songs had various types of note combination (Fig. 2), and they had combinatory rules which might relate to behavioral contexts (Inoue et al. 2017). Inoue et al. (2017) investigated whether two successive notes in the SAPA male songs were emitted following any syntactical rules. As a result, frequencies of the two successive note types differed from expected prevalence in 45 songs out of 68 songs. This result indicated that male gibbon songs have combinatory rules. There were 2205 patterns of note combinations in phrases of 68 songs. The number of phrases in the SAPA male songs ranged between 6 and 702. The Levenshtein distance (LD) method provides a robust analytical tool for the study of animal vocal sequences (Kershenbaum and Garland 2015; Zanoli et al. 2020). The LD between two strings is the minimum number of substitution, insertion, or deletion operations required to turn one string into the other. We assigned one character (kanji; one of three Japanese alphabets) to each note combination, and then used a single string to represent the phrase of the SAPA male’s song. We calculated the LD for each pair of strings (package stringdist 0.9.6.3 in R; Van der Loo 2014) within MF and non-MF songs, normalized by dividing by the length of the longer of the two strings and then averaged LD values. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare LD values between MF and non-MF periods.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Spectrograms of three phrases composed of “wa” and “oo” notes in the SAPA male songs. “w” denotes the “wa” note, and “o” denotes the “oo” note. Patterns of note combination composing three phrases were as follows: Phrase 1: wwwwwwwowoowwowwwwwww; Phrase 2: wwwwwwwwwowooowwwwwwwwww; Phrase 3: wwwwwwwwowwwwwwwwww

Results

Differences in activity budgets between MF and non-MF periods

Comparison of the activity budget during the MF period with that during the non-MF period of five gibbons revealed significant differences (Fig. 3; Supplementary Appendix Table 1). Gibbons spent more time singing, moving, feeding on fruits, playing, and grooming, and spent less time resting during the MF period. In particular, the proportion of playing and grooming behavior increased significantly during the MF period except for the FC adult female (Table 3). Adult males played with young gibbons in most cases. Copulation in the FC group was observed 5 times over 7 days in June 2019 and 17 times over 7 days in August–September in 2019. Since the FC female had a baby on October 31, 2019, she must have conceived in March and was pregnant from April to October (MF period). Our observations show that the FC female copulated during pregnancy in the MF period.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Activity budget of the SAPA adult male, FC adult male, FC adult female, SAPA adolescent, and FC juvenile during MF and non-MF periods

Table 3 The results of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test used to compare the proportion of playing and grooming behavior between MF and non-MF periods

Difference in daily travel distance and sleeping time between MF and non-MF periods

Travel distance of the two groups was significantly different between MF and non-MF periods (Table 4). Sleeping time of the two groups was also significantly different between MF and non-MF periods (Table 4). In our study area (time zone; UTC/GMT + 8 h), sunrise time ranged from 0554 to 0625 h and sunset time ranged from 1750 to 1827 h.

Table 4 Daily travel distance and daily sleeping time of the two groups during MF and non-MF periods

Difference in daily song duration and song complexity between MF and non-MF periods

Daily male song duration during the MF period of the two groups was significantly longer than that during the non-MF period (Fig. 4; Wilcoxon signed-rank test, W = 39, p = 0.029), as was daily duet song duration of the FC group in the MF period although it was not significant (Fig. 5; Wilcoxon signed-rank test, W = 13, p = 0.053).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Box plots of daily male song duration in both MF and non-MF periods

Fig. 5
figure 5

Box plots of daily duet song duration in both MF and non-MF periods

Using LD method, we compared the complexity of note combinations between 18 songs during the MF period and 50 songs during the non-MF period of the SAPA male’s songs. There were 821 patterns of note combinations in 1817 phrases in 18 MF songs. On the other hand, there were 1906 patterns of note combinations in 6074 phrases in 50 non-MF songs. The mean LD value within songs of MF period was 0.968 (SD = 0.023, n = 153), and the mean LD value within songs of non-MF period was 0.971 (SD = 0.026, n = 1225). There was no significant difference in LD values within songs between MF and non-MF periods (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, W = 102,189, p = 0.068).

Discussion

In Southeast Asia, there is a special event called mast fruiting when food is extremely abundant. In this study, we demonstrated how gibbons varied their behaviors in response to changes in fruit availability. Daily travel distance during the MF period was longer, and daily sleeping time initiated later than that during the non-MF period. Gibbons were more active during the MF period. Gibbons might increase activity time and travel distance during the MF period because they presumably have sufficient nutrition intake from fruits during the MF period. Gibbons showed seasonal differences between MF and non-MF periods in their activity budgets. They spent more time engaged in singing, moving, feeding on fruits, playing, and grooming and less time in resting during the MF period. Gibbons spent a great deal of time playing and grooming significantly during the MF period. Playing and grooming were social interactions within a group. Daily male song duration and duet song duration increased during the MF period. Most of the male songs and duet songs in Northern Gray gibbons are sung antiphonally within and among groups (Mitani 1985; Inoue et al. 2013). In other words, singing is both an intra- and inter-group social interaction behavior. As a result, we conclude that gibbons extended their total daily activity schedules during the MF period and spent the extra time on both intra- and inter-group social interactions. Gibbons might have taken in more energy during the MF period than during the non-MF period and used the abundant energy for social interactions. Our results show that there is a link between energy intake and social and calling behaviors.

However, our results may be limited by the small sample size. We took data from only two groups. Gibbons increased singing, moving, feeding on fruits, playing, and grooming, and decreased resting when they ate more fruit in the MF period. This suggests a relationship between fruit intake and gibbon behaviors. Although our sample size was small, our results are consistent with previous studies on the link between energy intake and social and calling behaviors (Bartlett 1999, 2003; Fan et al. 2008, 2012; Bach et al. 2017). When ripe fruit was abundant, gibbons exhibited very high rates of social activities such as grooming, playing, and social contact (Bartlett 2003). When gibbons consumed less fruit and more buds, they decreased their level of social activities such as grooming, playing, and singing (Fan et al. 2012). The novelty of this study is that we compared gibbon behaviors between MF and non-MF periods. Because fruits were much more abundant during the MF period than during the non-MF period, we could see more clearly the differences in gibbon behaviors between the two periods. Future research on a large number of groups over a wide area will improve our conclusions.

In this study, there were interesting observations in the behavior of the FC adult female that has not yet been reported. She did not exhibit much playing behavior during both MF and non-MF periods. She conceived in March 2019 and was pregnant from April to October (MF period) in 2019, giving birth on October 31, 2019, after seven months of pregnancy. This might explain why she did not show much play behavior during both MF and non-MF periods. Copulations in the FC group were observed during the MF period even though the female was pregnant. In this case, copulations were non-reproductive sexual behavior and can be considered a type of social interaction.

Daily male song duration and duet song duration increased during the MF period. Our results are consistent with the previous report that male and female gibbons in 21 populations, especially males, showed reduced singing performance when the availability of high-energy foods was reduced (Cowlishaw 1996). Clink et al. (2020) showed that male solo songs in the DVCA appear to be influenced by environmental factors such as rain in the preceding night. Rain in the preceding night led to fewer calling events and led to a later start time of male solos. In this study, rainfall in the preceding night (rain that fell between 18:00 the night before and 06:00 in the morning) occurred on 15 days (31.3%) in 48 following days during the MF period and 68 days (29.8%) in 228 following days during the non-MF period. The percentage of days when it rained on the preceding night to the total number of following days was almost the same between the MF and non-MF periods, suggesting that the effect of rain on male songs was not different between the two periods. We counted how many times male gibbons sang songs after rainfall in the preceding night. They sang songs 8 times (53.3%) in 15 days during the MF period and 13 times (19.1%) in 68 days during non-MF period. Male gibbons sang songs more frequently during the MF period after rainfall in the preceding night, suggesting that they might have enough energy to sing despite the energy loss from the rain.

Among social behaviors, singing especially requires energy. Okanoya (2017) indicated that courtship songs of Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica) became complex during the course of domestication. In the wild, gibbons vary their behaviors in response to the danger of the predator (Uhde and Sommer 2002). For example, gibbons’ choice of sleeping tree is driven primarily by predator avoidance (Cheyne et al. 2012). Although an MF event is not the same as the domestication process because predators exist in nature and MF does not continue throughout the year, an abundant food supply is a common character shared between MF and domestication. We hypothesized that gibbons might have developed a complex song during the fruit-rich MF period. However, there was no significant difference between MF and non-MF periods in the number of patterns of note combinations in the SAPA adult male’s songs, suggesting that male gibbon songs did not become more complex when fruits are abundant. The evolution of song complexity may not be achieved by temporary fruit abundance alone, but may require many more factors. Future research will be needed to clarify this issue.

In the present study, we found that gibbons increased social interactions such as playing, grooming, and singing in the MF period, although male song complexity did not increase. In addition, non-reproductive sexual behavior which could be considered as social interaction was observed in the MF period. Our results suggest that social interaction requires high energy cost and may develop in a fruit-rich environment.