Abstract
This study was undertaken to characterize and determine the recycling potential of municipal solid waste brought to a centralized facility in Akure, Nigeria. The facility serves a population of over 350,000 people. For a year, waste brought to the municipal solid waste facility from three sources namely market, residential and curbsides were characterized and quantified monthly. Physical and chemical characteristics of the waste were determined using standard methods. Data obtained were analyzed using statistical analysis. The results showed that an average of 0.17 ton of waste is transported to the dumpsite from the three major sources every day. There were statistically significant differences in all the types of waste except paper brought from the three sources. The wastes transported from the three sources in the city to the dumpsite were mainly composed of paper at 17.3%, nylon at 26.6%, organic waste at 25% and sand at 18.9%. These obtained values were compared with waste generated in the same area from studies in the literature. The chemical conditions of the organic waste showed that it could be used for efficient composting. The usage of the recycling plant was not effectively maximized, despite the high (96%) recyclable potentials of the waste.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The objectives of solid waste management in an area are to advance the environmental quality, safeguard its health, strengthen its technical and economic efficiency. However, achieving these objectives had become a difficulty confronting environmental protection agencies in Nigeria. Apart from the low level of public education on solid waste management [1], another barrier to achieving the objectives of solid waste management is the continual increase in the quantity of solid waste generated which is more than the capacity of the agencies. Population increase, swift urbanization and economic boom are some of the factors that result in the swift increase of solid waste in developing countries [2, 3]. These wastes are best disposed of by depositing them in open dumps with no environmental controls. This anthropogenic activity engenders gas emissions and leaching that affect the environment [4, 5]. Management of solid waste is normally seen as the main resolution making issue with respect to sustainable development in all local communities [6,7,8]. Hence for an effective solid waste management, the first and most significant stage is determining the composition and characterization of the wastes [9].
Procedures for solid waste characterization have been actualized for different applications. A common application is in determining the waste recycling potential [10,11,12,13], these include its potential for methane generation [14] and landfill mining [15]. It is used as organic fertilizer [16], animal foodstuffs [17] and other economically valuable materials [18]. Other applications of waste characterization are to determine its biodegradability [19], for a geotechnical purpose [20] and eventually for waste management plan [21,22,23,24]. Based on these applications, the type of information needed for a particular process differs. Although solid waste generation and characterization could be forecasted through prognostic tools and regression analysis [25], direct measurements for countries with developing economies is suggested due to the non-availability of data [26].
Various waste characterization and quantification studies have been carried out in Nigeria. Among these studies are those in Abia State [27], Akwa Ibom State [28], Anambra State [29], Benue State [30], Delta State [31], Edo State [32], Lagos State [33], Nasarawa State [34], Ogun State [35], Oyo State [36, 37], Kano State [38], and Rivers State [39, 40]. To reduce the effect of the enormous waste generated in Ondo State, Nigeria and also benefit from its recycling potentials, the State Government in 2006 established an integrated solid waste recycling plant managed by the Ondo State Management Board [41]. This study is aimed at the physical and chemical characterization of the solid wastes dumped at the solid waste management facility of the State. The recycling potentials (which is the possibility of transforming waste materials into new and usable ones) are also determined. As a substitute to landfilling or open dump, recycling helps reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Unlike studies from other states in Nigeria [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40] where waste characterization was done at the point of its generation/collection, characterization of wastes in this study was conducted at the point of disposal on the dumpsite. The data obtained from this study will decrease the expenses involved in the advancement of solid waste management in the State and also assist in developing regulations that will make the State achieve sustainable development goals.
Materials and methods
Study area
The city of Akure, the capital of Ondo State, Nigeria, Africa is located in Latitude 7°15′0″ North and Longitude 5°11′42″ East as shown in Fig. 1. The population of the city was over 350,000 people as of 2008 [42]. The Akure Integrated Recycling Plant was commissioned by erstwhile Nigeria’s President, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo on 14 June 2006 and began operations on the 1 December 2006. The design capacity of the plant for an 8 h daily production is 5 tons/day for organic fertilizer and 0.5 tons/day for plastic recycling. The plant consists of three units namely: (1) material recovery/quality control unit; (2) material processing; (3) production unit and marketing unit. The initial size of the facility is 7 ha. 6 ha of land is used as the dumpsite while the remaining 1 ha is used for the recycling plant. Presently, the dumpsite had covered more than 6 ha with a need for its rehabilitation [43]. A layout map showing the various sections of the integrated recycling plant is shown in Fig. 2.
Sample collection and segregation
The solid wastes brought to the dumpsite were collected for a period of 12 months. The collected wastes were sampled from three different sources of generation:
-
(a)
Market: wastes originating mainly from the markets where goods are being sold.
-
(b)
Residential: wastes emanating from 21 zones of residential areas in the city.
-
(c)
Curbsides (non-specific wastes): wastes that are generated from offices and its environ.
Segregation was done once a month by picking a waste collection truck coming out of the three sources described above for each month. Figure 3a shows the waste from a market waste collection truck segregated into cartons and paper in Fig. 3b and into nylon and plastics in Fig. 3c. The workers were encouraged to segregate the wastes centrally and the various components of the solid wastes weighed. The mass and density of the sorted wastes were obtained by placing the wastes in a 0.5 m3 container and using a 20 kg capacity Camry kitchen weighing scale. The recycling potential for the segregated wastes was determined using Table 1 modified from previous studies [11, 44].
Physicochemical analysis of organic waste
The physical parameters of the solid waste samples that were analyzed include the moisture content, pH and density. The moisture content (which is the percentage of the sample weight lost during drying) of the waste was determined by weighing an empty moisture can (W0). About 200 g of the grab samples in triplicates was added to the moisture can and weighed (W1). The moisture cans and samples were then dried in the oven for 24 h and thereafter cooled in a desiccator. The cans with the dry samples were finally weighed (W2) and the moisture content calculated from Eq. 1 is the difference in recorded weights [45].
The Dwyer model WPH1 waterproof pH meter calibrated with standard buffer 7.0 and 4.0 using the Electrometric pH determinations method [46] was used in determining the pH of the waste suspension. The chemical parameters analyzed were nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbon percentages in the waste and they were determined using the standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater [47]. The data gotten were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) at 5% level of significance.
Results and discussion
Characterization of solid wastes
The result of the segregation of the solid wastes brought from the three sources showed that the type of waste transported to the dumpsite include paper/carton, nylon, organic wastes, leaves and garden trimmings, plastic, textiles, wood, metal, can/tins, sand, ash and bottles, tyre and bones. The percentage composition by mass of these characterized wastes is presented in Table 2. The average mass and standard deviation of the waste from the three sources per month is shown in Fig. 4.
From the results in Table 2, the most transported waste from the market were organic wastes at 30.2%, this could be attributed to the type of commodities being sold and consumed in the market. For the residential area, the most transported waste was nylon at 27.1% which was closely followed by organic waste at 25.4%. The curbsides had sand at 30.1% to be the most transported waste to the dumpsite. The combination of waste from the three sources on the dumpsite in Table 2 and the specific mass of this waste shown in Fig. 4 revealed that paper, nylon, organic waste and sand were the main types of waste transported from the city (Akure) to the dumpsite. Average monthly mass of paper, nylon, organic waste and sand was 814 kg, 1260 kg, 1180 kg and 888 kg respectively. The average monthly mass of the total solid waste disposed on the dumpsite is 4711.9 kg (5.2 ton). The average amount of solid waste brought to the dumpsite is about 157 kg per day (0.17 ton/day), which is less than the design capacity of the recycling plant for organic waste. The P value which indicates an evidence against the null hypothesis was also determined and presented in Table 3. The P values showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the quantities of paper brought to the dumpsite from the three waste sources, there was a significant difference in quantities of the other types of wastes. The recycling potential of the characterized wastes was also evaluated as shown in Fig. 5. 20% were recyclables (with existing recycling market), 76% were potentially recyclables (with no existing recycling local market) and 4% were non-recyclable. From the current recycling potential, the recycling plant is adequate in its operational capacity for wastes disposed on the dumpsite. Although separation/sorting of recyclable wastes is done on the dumpsite. Separation at the point of generation will be difficult due to the waste generation culture of the populace, improper planning of waste generation sources and non-institutionalization of waste management activities in the study area.
The potentially recyclables were also separated like the recyclables and stored for possible future demand.
Physicochemical properties of the organic waste sample
The result of the average monthly value of the physicochemical properties of the organic waste is presented in Table 4. The density ranges from 229.3 to 248.5 kg/m3 with a significant difference in the values, the residential areas had the highest. The moisture content ranges from 64.1 to 72.5% with no significant difference in the values, the residential areas had the highest. The pH ranges from 4.8 to 5.1, an indication of a slightly acidic waste, with no significant difference in the values. The chemical properties of the organic waste showed that the percentage carbon of the waste was the highest followed by the percentage of nitrogen and phosphorus. There was no statistically significant difference in the values for the three sources.
Comparison of solid wastes composition
The knowledge of wastes composition permits for prescribing strategies in separating and collecting wastes for recycling. The results of this study had made known: (1) the volume of waste brought to the Akure dumpsite; (2) the high recycling potential of the waste; and (3) the potential (usage) of the recycling plant could be effectively maximized. Figure 6 shows the composition of solid waste generated in Akure from various studies [16, 48, 49] compared to the one brought to the dumpsite in the present study. The pattern of waste flow in this study is such that after waste generation, some of these wastes (those not disposed indiscriminately) are collected in dustbins which maybe scavenged or recycled indirectly. The remaining wastes are afterwards transported to the dumpsite by the waste disposal agents. It is at this point that the waste characterization was carried out in this study.
From the composition of solid wastes generated in the city of Akure in 2005, 2014 and 2015 compared to the ones brought to the dumpsite in Fig. 6, it could be observed that apart from sand, plastic and nylon wastes, all other forms of wastes that actually arrive at the dumping site were very much lower than the ones reported in the previous studies. The reduction may be attributed to the fact that there are a lot of informal recycling activities and indiscriminate waste disposal going on in Akure. Also, the wastes characterized in the studies [16, 48, 49] were done at the point of generation/collection unlike the characterization in this study that was done at the point of disposal/dumping. However, the increment in the sand and soil-like waste may be attached to the amount of waste from the curbsides brought to the dumpsite. For the plastic and nylon, the increase could be due to the high usages of plastic and nylon in present times compared to the periods where these previous studies were undertaken.
Chemical conditions of organic wastes for efficient composting
Composting is the aerobic decomposition of organic waste under controlled conditions by microorganisms into a soil-like material called compost. The controlled conditions in the organic waste include an adequate supply of oxygen; a level of carbon to nitrogen ratio; appreciable moisture content; good temperature and pH levels. The chemical conditions of organic wastes segregated in this study alongside the recommended chemical controlled conditions needed for efficient composting [50] are presented in Table 5.
The chemical conditions of the segregated organic waste from the three different sources on the dumpsite in Table 5 showed that not all the recommended values for efficient composting were met. For the carbon to nitrogen ratio, only organic waste from curbsides met the recommended values. The carbon to nitrogen ratio in the organic waste from the market and residential sources will increase with the addition of wastes (e.g. straw) that are rich in carbon and the carbon is in a form that can easily decompose. For the moisture content, only organic waste from the market met the recommended values. The moisture content of organic wastes from other sources (residential and curbsides) will reduce by little drying of the waste, although this may not be necessary as moisture content tends to decrease as composting increases. The pH values of the organic wastes (from the three sources) will increase with an addition of small quantity of lime, ashes or any other alkaline additive thoroughly mixed with the waste.
Conclusions
The study investigated the characterization (which in turn determined the recycling potential) and the physicochemical properties of wastes brought to the Akure dumpsite (which contains a recycling plant). About 814 kg, 1260 kg, 1180 kg and 888 kg of paper, nylon, organic waste and sand, respectively, were the main wastes disposed at a monthly average on the dumpsite. An average monthly mass of 4711.9 kg (5.2 ton) solid waste was disposed on the dumpsite. The average amount of waste was calculated as 0.17 ton per day, providing a good source of raw material for the establishment of a recycling plant. About 95% of the wastes transported to the dumpsite were recyclable/potentially recyclable. The chemical properties of the wastes (organic waste) showed that with little or no alterations, the controlled conditions required for composting were met. The usage of the recycling plant can be effectively maximized by transporting more of the generated organic waste in the city to the dumpsite. Regulations against indiscriminate waste disposal and informal recycling activities should be made by the government.
References
Ezeah C, Roberts CL (2012) Analysis of barriers and success factors affecting the adoption of sustainable management of municipal solid waste in Nigeria. J Environ Manag 103:9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.027
Minghua Z, Xiumin F, Rovetta A et al (2009) Municipal solid waste management in Pudong New Area, China. Waste Manag 29:1227–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.07.016
Aǧdaǧ ON (2009) Comparison of old and new municipal solid waste management systems in Denizli, Turkey. Waste Manag 29:456–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.01.012
Oluwatuyi OE, Ojuri OO (2017) Environmental performance of lime-rice husk ash stabilized lateritic soil contaminated with lead or naphthalene. Geotech Geol Eng 35:2947–2964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0294-9
Ojuri OO, Taiwo OA, Oluwatuyi OE (2016) Heavy metal migration along a rural highway route: Ilesha-Akure roadside soil, Southwestern, Nigeria. Glob Nest J 18:742–760
Pires A, Martinho G, Chang N-B (2011) Solid waste management in European countries: a review of systems analysis techniques. J Environ Manag 92:1033–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.024
Ojuri OO, Oluwatuyi OE (2018) Compacted sawdust ash-lime-stabilised soil-based hydraulic barriers for waste containment. Proc Inst Civ Eng Waste Resour Manag 171:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.17.00037
Ojuri O, Oluwatuyi O (2017) Strength and hydraulic conductivity characteristics of sand-bentonite mixtures designed as a landfill liner. Jordan J Civ Eng 11:614–622
Gu B, Wang H, Chen Z et al (2015) Characterization, quantification and management of household solid waste: a case study in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 98:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.03.001
Donnini Mancini S, Rodrigues Nogueira A, Akira Kagohara D et al (2007) Recycling potential of urban solid waste destined for sanitary landfills: the case of Indaiatuba, SP, Brazil. Waste Manag Res 25:517–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X07082113
de Vega CA, Benítez SO, Barreto MER (2008) Solid waste characterization and recycling potential for a university campus. Waste Manag 28:S21–S26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.03.022
Ojeda-Benitez S, Armijo De Vega C, Ramírez-Barreto ME (2003) Characterization and quantification of household solid wastes in a Mexican city. Resour Conserv Recycl 39:211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(03)00028-4
Al-Khatib IA, Monou M, Abu Zahra ASF et al (2010) Solid waste characterization, quantification and management practices in developing countries. A case study: Nablus district—Palestine. J Environ Manag 91:1131–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.01.003
Mor S, Ravindra K, De Visscher A et al (2006) Municipal solid waste characterization and its assessment for potential methane generation: a case study. Sci Total Environ 371:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.04.014
Kaartinen T, Sormunen K, Rintala J (2013) Case study on sampling, processing and characterization of landfilled municipal solid waste in the view of landfill mining. J Clean Prod 55:56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.036
Adewumi IK, Ogedengbe MO, Adepetu JA, Fabiyi YL (2005) Planning organic fertilizer industries for municipal solid wastes management. J Appl Sci Res 1:285–291
García AJ, Esteban MB, Márquez MC, Ramos P (2005) Biodegradable municipal solid waste: characterization and potential use as animal feedstuffs. Waste Manag 25:780–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.01.006
Shinzato MC, Hypolito R (2005) Solid waste from aluminum recycling process: characterization and reuse of its economically valuable constituents. Waste Manag 25:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2004.08.005
Bayard R, Benbelkacem H, Gourdon R, Buffière P (2017) Characterization of selected municipal solid waste components to estimate their biodegradability. J Environ Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.087
Zekkos D, Kavazanjian E, Bray JD et al (2010) Physical characterization of municipal solid waste for geotechnical purposes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136:1231–1241. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000326
Coker A, Sangodoyin A, Sridhar M et al (2009) Medical waste management in Ibadan, Nigeria: obstacles and prospects. Waste Manag 29:804–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.040
Gómez G, Meneses M, Ballinas L, Castells F (2009) Seasonal characterization of municipal solid waste (MSW) in the city of Chihuahua, Mexico. Waste Manag 29:2018–2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.02.006
Taghipour H, Amjad Z, Aslani H et al (2016) Characterizing and quantifying solid waste of rural communities. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18:790–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-015-0365-z
Lima PDM, Paulo PL (2018) Solid-waste management in the rural area of BRAZIL: a case study in Quilombola communities. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0722-9
Ghinea C, Drăgoi EN, Comăniţă E-D et al (2016) Forecasting municipal solid waste generation using prognostic tools and regression analysis. J Environ Manag 182:80–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.026
Hristovski K, Olson L, Hild N et al (2007) The municipal solid waste system and solid waste characterization at the municipality of Veles, Macedonia. Waste Manag 27:1680–1689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.09.003
Nkwachukwu OI, Chidi NI, Charles KO (2010) Issues of roadside disposal habit of municipal solid waste, environmental impacts and implementation of sound management practices in developing country “Nigeria”. Int J Environ Sci Dev 1:409–418
Ukpong IE, Udofia EP (2011) Domestic solid waste management in a rapidly growing Nigerian City of Uyo. J Hum Ecol 36:229–235
Agunwamba JC, Ukpai OK, Onyebuenyi IC (1998) Solid waste management in Onitsha, Nigeria. Waste Manag Res 16:23–31
Sha’Ato R, Aboho SY, Oketunde FO et al (2007) Survey of solid waste generation and composition in a rapidly growing urban area in Central Nigeria. Waste Manag 27:352–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.02.008
Owamah IH, Izinyon OC, Igbinewekan P (2017) Characterization and quantification of solid waste generation in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria: a case study of Ogbe-Ijoh community in Delta State. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19:366–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-015-0426-3
Ogu VI (2000) Private sector participation and municipal waste management in Benin City, Nigeria. Environ Urban 12:103–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780001200209
Salami L, Susu AA, Patinvoh RJ, Olafadehan OA (2011) Characterisation study of solid wastes: a case of Lagos State. Int J Appl Sci Technol 1:47–52
Anyanwu NC, Adefila JO (2014) Nature and management of solid waste in Karu Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Am Int J Contemp Res 4:149–159
Babayemi JO, Dauda KT (2009) Evaluation of solid waste generation, categories and disposal options in developing countries: a case study of Nigeria. J Appl Sci Environ Manag 13:83–88. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v13i3.55370
Afon AO, Okewole A (2007) Estimating the quantity of solid waste generation in Oyo, Nigeria. Waste Manag Res 25:371–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X07078286
Afon AO (2007) An analysis of solid waste generation in a traditional African city: the example of Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Environ Urban 19:527–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247807082834
Nabegu AB (2010) An analysis of municipal solid waste in Kano Metropolis, Nigeria. J Hum Ecol 31:111–119
Igoni AH, Ayotamuno MJ, Ogaji SOT, Probert SD (2007) Municipal solid-waste in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Appl Energy 84:664–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2006.12.002
Babatunde BB, Vincent-Akpu IF, Woke GN et al (2013) Comparative analysis of municipal solid waste (MSW) composition in three local government areas in Rivers State, Nigeria. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 7:874–881. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJEST12.112
Olanrewaju OO, Ilemobade AA (2009) Waste to wealth: a case study of the Ondo State integrated wastes recycling and treatment project, Nigeria. Eur J Soc Sci 8:7–16
Aribigbola A (2008) Improving urban land use planning and management in Nigeria: the case of Akure. Theor Empir Res Urban Manag 3:1–7
Ojuri OO, Ayodele FO, Oluwatuyi OE (2018) Risk assessment and rehabilitation potential of a millennium city dumpsite in Sub-Saharan Africa. Waste Manag 76:621–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.002
Thanh NP, Matsui Y, Fujiwara T (2010) Household solid waste generation and characteristic in a Mekong Delta city, Vietnam. J Environ Manag 91:2307–2321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.016
Vesilind PA, Worrell WA, Reinhart DR (2003) Solid Waste engineering. Thomson Asia, Singapore
APHA (1992) Water pollution control federation. Stand methods exam water wastewater, vol 19. Am Public Heal Assoc, Washington
APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Am Public Heal Assoc, Washington
Ojuri OO, Adegoke PK (2015) Geotechnical characteristics of synthetic municipal solid waste for effective landfill design. Int J GEOMATE 9:1418–1427
Oloruntade AJ, Adeoye PA, Alao F (2014) Municipal solid waste collection and management strategies in Akure, South-Western Nigeria. J Solid Waste Technol Manag 40:24–32. https://doi.org/10.5276/JSWTM.2014.24
Rynk R, de Kamp M van, Willson GB et al (1992) On-farm composting handbook. Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, Ithaca
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elemile, O.O., Sridhar, M.K.C. & Oluwatuyi, O.E. Solid waste characterization and its recycling potential: Akure municipal dumpsite, Southwestern, Nigeria. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 21, 585–593 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-00820-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-00820-2