Abstract
Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli are a major public health problem. Accurate and rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms can facilitate appropriate infection prevention measures. The objective was to evaluate the performance of the RAPIDEC® CARBA NP assay (RAPIDEC), a screening assay that utilizes a pH indicator to detect carbapenem hydrolysis within 2 h. A multicenter study evaluated 306 clinical bacterial strains of Enterobacterales (n = 257) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 49). The RAPIDEC was compared to a composite reference standard—the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Carba NP assay, PCR for specific carbapenemase genes (blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA-48-like, blaVIM and blaIMP), and phenotypic carbapenem susceptibility testing. The assay was evaluated using two culture incubation times for the bacterial isolates: “routine”(cultures incubated 18-24 h) and “short” (cultures incubated 4-5 h). For the routine incubation, the overall percent agreement was 98.7% with a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 99.6% and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 97.4%; there were five false positives and one false negative. For the short incubation, the overall percent agreement was 98.0% with a PPA of 98.5% and a NPA of 97.3%; there were five false positives and four false negatives. RAPIDEC results for the P. aeruginosa isolates were 100% concordant with the reference standard for both incubation times. The RAPIDEC assay is an accurate and rapid (≤ 2 h) assay for the detection of the most common carbapenemases in clinical isolates. Growth from a short incubation culture may be used to reliably detect carbapenemase production in clinical strains.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli (CP-GNB) are a major public health problem [1]. Carbapenems are broad-spectrum antimicrobials and frequently represent “drugs of last resort” for the treatment of severe infections. Carbapenemases, enzymes that degrade carbapenems and other β-lactams, are encoded by genes located on mobile genetic elements, facilitating spread in healthcare facilities.
There are numerous carbapenemase genes that have been identified in Enterobacterales and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. These genes are classified according to their molecular properties and in the USA most frequently include the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (blaKPC) (Ambler class A), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (blaNDM) (Ambler class B), and OXA-48-like (blaOXA-48-like) (Ambler class D) [2, 3]. Additionally, carbapenem resistance can be conferred by mechanisms other than carbapenemases, such as an AmpC β-lactamase combined with a porin mutation [4,5,6,7]. The ability to differentiate between CP-GNB and other resistance mechanisms is important for infection control, treatment and epidemiological surveillance [8].
Multiple tests have been developed to facilitate the accurate detection of carbapenemases in bacterial isolates. The modified Hodge test (MHT), which was historically recommended by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for carbapenemase confirmation, has limitations for both the analytical sensitivity and specificity. For example, isolates producing the NDM carbapenemase have been shown to yield a false-negative result [9, 10]. As a result, CLSI no longer recommends the usage of MHT and currently endorses the use of the Carba NP test and the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) [11]. The Carba NP test is a colorimetric assay that detects the hydrolysis of the β-lactam ring of imipenem [12]. Like the MHT, this assay also has limitations including low sensitivity for the detection of the OXA-48-like enzyme and its variants [9]. The mCIM measures an isolate’s ability to degrade meropenem utilizing readily available materials in a clinical laboratory. Recent studies have shown that this method has high sensitivity and specificity [9, 10, 13, 14]. The method has also been modified for the detection of carbapenemase production in P. aeruginosa [15,16,17].
Adapted from the Carba NP test, the RAPIDEC® CARBA NP assay (bioMérieux) is a commercially available, FDA-cleared assay for the phenotypic detection of the five most common carbapenemases in Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa with results available in 30 min to 2 h. The objective of this multicenter study was to evaluate the analytical performance characteristics of the RAPIDEC® CARBA NP assay.
Materials and methods
Clinical evaluation sites
The evaluation of the bioMérieux RAPIDEC® CARBA NP was performed at five sites: Cleveland Clinic (Cleveland, OH), International Health Management Associates (IHMA) (Schaumburg IL), New York Presbyterian Queens (Flushing, NY), University of California- Los Angeles (UCLA) Health (Los Angeles, CA), and Washington University School of Medicine (St. Louis, MO). Institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained at each study site prior trial initiation.
Quality control
Quality control (QC) organisms included K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-1705 (blaKPC positive), K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-1706 (blaKPC negative), and K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 (ESBL-positive, carbapenemase-negative). QC organisms were tested on each day of testing at all clinical trial sites and were tested at a minimum of 20 replicates on the RAPIDEC CARBA NP test. No more than five replicates of each isolate were tested per day. QC organisms were tested using both the routine and short incubation procedures.
Clinical isolates
Clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were tested from both fresh and stock isolates. A fresh clinical isolate was defined as one that had been isolated from a clinical specimen in the past 7 days and stored on an agar plate or slant at room temperature or refrigerated. A stock isolate was defined as an isolate that had been stored (typically frozen at − 70 °C) for future sub-culture. Stock isolates were previously characterized at each testing site as carbapenemase-positive by the site’s methodologies and represented various enzyme types (KPC, NDM, VIM, OXA-48-like, and/or IMP) (Table 1). For RAPIDEC CARBA NP testing, two culture incubations were evaluated: routine (18 to 24 h) and short (4 to 5 h). For the routine culture incubation, fresh clinical isolates were sub-cultured onto trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood and incubated in ambient air for 18 to 24 h prior to testing. Frozen stock and challenge isolates were passaged a second time on sheep blood agar and incubated for 18 to 24 h prior to testing. For the short culture incubation, fresh clinical isolates were first sub-cultured onto MacConkey agar and incubated for 18 to 24 h then sub-cultured to sheep blood agar and incubated for 4 to 5 h to allow for sufficient growth to perform testing. Frozen stock and challenge isolates were sub-cultured twice before being tested with an initial sub-culture to sheep blood agar and incubated for 18 to 24 h. The isolates were then sub-cultured to MacConkey agar and incubated for 18 to 24 h followed by a final sub-culture to sheep blood agar and incubated for 4-5 h.
Challenge isolates
A challenge set consisting of 151 well-characterized isolates (sourced from bioMérieux internal stock collection and the FDA-CDC AR bank) was evaluated at two sites, University of California—Los Angeles (bioMérieux isolates) and International Health Management Associates (FDA-CDC AR bank isolates). Challenge isolates were incubated using both the short and routine culture incubation times as described for the clinical isolates. All challenge isolates were tested at a single site.
Reproducibility
Ten well-characterized isolates were tested in triplicate for a total of 6 days by two different operators at three different clinical trial sites. Reproducibility was performed for both the routine and short culture incubation procedures.
RAPIDEC® CARBA NP test
The RAPIDEC® CARBA NP assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. One hundred (100) microliters of API suspension medium was dispensed into each of three wells: (a), (b), and (c). With the lid on the strip, the strip was incubated for 4–10 min at room temperature (15–25 °C). Next, the contents in well (b) were gently mixed using the provided stick. Using a new stick, several colonies of the test organism were picked up and deposited into well (c) and mixed until the turbidity was at least equivalent to that of well (b). The strip was then incubated at room temperature for 30 min. After incubation, 25 μL from well (c) was transferred to both wells (d) and (e). Next, 25 μL from well (a) was transferred to wells (d) and (e). The strip was then incubated at 33–38 °C for 30–40 min. Reading of test results was performed by comparing the colors in well (d) and (e) using the provided reading guide. A test was positive when a significant variation in color was observed between the two wells. For a negative or indeterminate reaction, the test was re-incubated for an additional 90 min (total test time was not to exceed 2 h). For mucoid strains, 100 μL of the API suspension medium was added to well (a) (well (b) was not used). The strip was incubated for 4–10 min at room temperature. During this incubation time, 150 μL of the API suspension medium was added to a 1.-mL tube with two 3-mm diameter glass beads. A 10-μL loop full of bacterial colonies was added to the tube using the stick provided in the kit. The tube was vortexed until the mucoid appearance of the suspension had disappeared enough for the suspension to be easily pipetted; 100 μL of this suspension was dispensed into well (c) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The remaining test procedure was followed as shown above.
Reference standard
The composite reference standard for this study was based on three different tests for carbapenemase determination: the CLSI Carba NP test, PCR, and carbapenem MIC testing (imipenem (IMP), meropenem (MEM), and ertapenem (ETP) for Enterobacterales and imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem (DOR) for P. aeruginosa) (Supplemental Table). Methods for PCR testing are described in detail in the Supplemental Methods. MIC testing was performed using the GN-71 (IMP, MER, and ERT) and GN-68 (DOR) cards on the VITEK2 instrument (bioMérieux) per manufacturer’s instructions using the FDA-approved breakpoints (CLSI M100-S20). Isolates were considered carbapenem not susceptible if they tested as either intermediate or resistant to at least one of the carbapenems tested.
Statistical analysis
Clinical trial results obtained from the RAPIDEC® CARBA NP test were compared to the test results obtained from the composite reference methods. Positive and negative percent agreement data were calculated. For discrepant results, a major error was considered for any isolate that was positive by the RAPIDEC® CARBA NP assay, but negative by the composite reference method and a very major error occurred when the RAPIDEC® CARBA NP assay was negative, but the isolate was positive for a carbapenemase by the composite reference method. Any sample in which the RAPIDEC® CARBA NP result was not interpretable was excluded from the study (< 5%).
Results
Bacterial isolates
A total of 485 unique isolates were tested. For the routine and short culture incubations, 306 and 300 clinical isolates and 151 and 149 challenge isolates, respectively, were included in the final analyses. Isolates excluded from the final analyses included those which were determined to have a carbapenemase enzyme other than KPC, NDM, OXA-48-like, VIM, and IMP (n = 22); a hyper-mucoid phenotype (n = 3); and isolates which were determined to have lost the resistance mechanism during serial sub-culture (n = 3). For the short culture incubation, an additional eight isolates were excluded due to insufficient growth for testing following the short incubation.
Quality control testing
All quality control results (n = 478 results for routine culture incubation and n = 501 results for short culture incubation) for both culture incubation times generated expected results for all isolates and at all sites performing testing.
Reproducibility studies
For the routine culture incubation, 98.2% (884/900) of the tests agreed with the expected results. The reproducibility rate was slightly higher at 99.1% (892/900) using the short culture incubation. All results that were in disagreement occurred with the same isolate at two different sites, which was linked to partial loss of expected enzyme activity. Reproducibility for that isolate ranged from 60.0 to 86.7% at the different sites with the different culture incubations.
Challenge studies
Routine culture incubation
With the routine culture incubation period (18–24 h before testing), the overall percent agreement was 99.3% with a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 99.1% and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 100.0% (Table 2). There were no false-positive results and only one false-negative result (Table 4). The false-negative result occurred with a KPC positive Proteus mirabilis. For this isolate, only imipenem (MIC = 16.0 μg/mL) was resistant using the Vitek 2; MEM (MIC = 0.5 μg/mL) and ETP (MIC = 1.0 μg/mL) were susceptible. The KPC-positive result was determined using PCR.
Short culture incubation
Using the shorter culture incubation time provided similar results to the routine culture incubation. The overall percent agreement was 97.9%, with a PPA of 97.3% and an NPA of 100.0% (Table 2). Again, there were no false-positive results (Table 3), but there were three false-negative results. The false-negative results occurred with the same P. mirabilis from the routine culture incubation in addition to an Enterobacter cloacae (VIM) and a Klebsiella pneumoniae (NDM) isolate (Table 5). The E. cloacae (MEM > 16 μg/mL, IMP > 16 μg/mL, ETP > 8 μg/mL) and K. pneumoniae (MER >8 μg/mL, IMP 32 μg/mL, ETP > 8 μg/mL) isolates had very high MICs to the carbapenems tested.
Clinical isolate studies
Routine culture incubation
The overall percent agreement was 98.4% with a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 100.0% and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 96.8% (Table 2). There were five (3.2%) false-positive results (Table 3). Four of the false-positive isolates were negative by all other methods (VITEK® 2 susceptibility testing, PCR and CLSI Carba NP), but one isolate was positive for the blaKPC gene by PCR, but negative for the presence a carbapenemase by the other two methods. All errors occurred with Enterobacterales (Tables 3 and 4). False-positive errors occurred in Escherichia coli (3), K. pneumoniae (1), and Serratia marcescens (1) isolates. There was 100% agreement for all P. aeruginosa isolates tested (Table 4).
Short culture incubation
The overall percent agreement was 98.0%, with a PPA of 99.3% and an NPA of 96.7% (Table 2). Again, there were five (3.3%) false-positive results (Table 3), all of which also provided false-positive results with the routine culture incubation (Table 3). In addition, there was one false-negative result. The false-negative result occurred with an E. cloacae isolate with an OXA-48-like enzyme (MICs: MER 4 μg/mL, IMP 8 μg/mL, ETP > 8 μg/mL (Table 4).
This study also evaluated the performance of the RAPIDEC® CARBA NP assay using fresh (< 7 days) and stock (frozen) isolates. For the clinical isolates, four out of the five false-positive errors occurred with stock isolates (routine and short culture incubations), and the false-negative result occurring with the short culture incubation period also occurred in a stock isolate (Table 5). Only one error (false negative) occurred using a fresh isolate. All challenge isolates were stock isolates and had four false negatives.
Discussion
The emergence and rapid spread of CP-GNB is a world-wide public health concern. KPC-producing organisms are endemic in the USA, with other carbapenemases being isolated at an increasing frequency [2, 18]. In 2018, the CDC has added carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CP-CRE; E. coli, Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella spp.) as a National Notifiable Disease [19]. Laboratories now have a greater need for a rapid and simple method to detect the expression of these enzymes in clinical isolates. The RAPIDEC® CARBA NP assay is FDA-cleared for the detection of carbapenemases in Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa and is simple to perform and less expensive as compared to PCR. The clinical trial data presented here from five different sites shows that the assay has an overall PPA of 99.6% and NPA of 97.4% using both clinical and challenge isolates with a routine culture incubation period (18–24 h). Additionally, the assay was evaluated using a short culture incubation (4–5 h) and demonstrated a PPA of 98.5% and NPA of 97.3%.
The results of our study are similar to previous evaluations of the assay testing Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa [9, 20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Overall, in all isolates tested, there were five false-positive and one false-negative result. All incorrect results occurred with Enterobacterales isolates. It is possible that the Serratia marcescens isolate, which was considered a false positive based on the reference method utilized in this study, may actually contain a SME carbapenemase which has been previously described in S. marcescens isolates but was not specifically tested for herein [28, 29]. For the five carbapenemase enzymes detected by the reference methods, there was one false-negative isolate for each KPC, NDM, OXA-48-like, and VIM enzyme with the short culture incubation period and only one false-negative result for the KPC enzyme with the routine culture incubation. The shortened culture incubation time may not have allowed for full expression of the enzymes and therefore was not detected. False-negative results using the shorter culture incubation period were also reported in a previous study [21].
Previous studies examining tests for carbapenemase detection have shown lower sensitivities for isolates containing OXA-48-like enzymes [9, 30,31,32,33,34]. Our study examined 23 OXA-48-like containing isolates with only one false-negative result. That isolate was correctly detected using the routine culture incubation but was missed with the short culture incubation. This again may be due to decreased expression of the carbapenemase in the shortened culture incubation time. Other studies examining this assay have also demonstrated the need for the longer culture incubation time for the detection of the OXA-48-like enzyme [21]. Previous studies have shown that the RAPIDEC® CARBA NP assay has higher sensitivity for the detection of OXA-48-like enzyme as compared to other colorimetric assays [9, 22, 24], but several studies using the RAPIDEC® CARBA NP assay did report false-negative results for isolates containing the OXA-48-like enzyme [9, 23, 25]. The increased sensitivity for OXA-48-like enzymes may be, at least partially, due to the increased inoculum size (10 μL) of the RAPIDEC® CARBA NP assay as compared to the CLSI Carba NP assay (1 μL) [22].
Strengths of this study include a large number of isolates evaluated from five different clinical sites, representing multiple different genera and carbapenemase enzymes. Limitations of this study include a relatively low number of isolates containing OXA-48-like, VIM, and IMP carbapenemase-containing isolates evaluated. Additionally, isolates expressing carbapenemases other than KPC, OXA-48-like, NDM, VIM, and IMP were not represented. Although not an issue in this current study, others have reported some difficulty in the interpretation of the color variation for determining the final results, especially for weaker carbapenemases (weak positives) [35].
In conclusion, the RAPIDEC® CARBA NP assay is an FDA-cleared test that can be utilized to confirm the presence of carbapenemases in Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. It is an accurate and rapid assay that can be utilized by clinical laboratories as part of infection control and antimicrobial stewardship programs for CP-GNB.
References
CDC (2013) Vital signs: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. MMWR 62(9):165–170
Viau R, Frank KM, Jacobs MR, Wilson B, Kaye K, Donskey CJ, Perez F, Endimiani A, Bonomo RA (2016) Intestinal carriage of carbapenemase-producing organisms: current status of surveillance methods. Clin Microbiol Rev 29(1):1–27
Queenan AM, Bush K (2007) Carbapenemases: the versatile beta-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev 20(3):440–458
Vasoo S, Barreto JN, Tosh PK (2015) Emerging issues in gram-negative bacterial resistance: an update for the practicing clinician. Mayo Clin Proc 90(3):395–403
Martinez-Martinez L, Pascual A, Hernandez-Alles S, Alvarez-Diaz D, Suarez AI, Tran J, Benedi VJ, Jacoby GA (1999) Roles of beta-lactamases and porins in activities of carbapenems and cephalosporins against Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43(7):1669–1673
Girlich D, Poirel L, Nordmann P (2009) CTX-M expression and selection of ertapenem resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53(2):832–834
Quale J, Bratu S, Gupta J, Landman D (2006) Interplay of efflux system, AmpC, and OprD expression in carbapenem resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50(5):1633–1641
CDC (2015) Facility guidance for control of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE): November 2015 update- CRE toolkit, Atlanta
Tamma PD, Opene BN, Gluck A, Chambers KK, Carroll KC, Simner PJ (2017) Comparison of 11 phenotypic assays for accurate detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol 55(4):1046–1055
McMullen AR, Yarbrough ML, Wallace MA, Shupe A, Burnham CD (2017) Evaluation of genotypic and phenotypic methods to detect carbapenemase production in gram-negative bacilli. Clin Chem 63(3):723–730
CLSI (2017) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: CLSI supplement M100S, 27th edn. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne
Nordmann P, Poirel L, Dortet L (2012) Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg Infect Dis 18(9):1503–1507
van der Zwaluw K, de Haan A, Pluister GN, Bootsma HJ, de Neeling AJ, Schouls LM (2015) The carbapenem inactivation method (CIM), a simple and low-cost alternative for the Carba Np test to assess phenotypic carbapenemase activity in gram-negative rods. PLoS One 10(3):e0123690
Pierce VM, Simner PJ, Lonsway DR, Roe-Carpenter DE, Johnson JK, Brasso WB, Bobenchik AM, Lockett ZC, Charnot-Katsikas A, Ferraro MJ, Thomson RB Jr, Jenkins SG, Limbago BM, Das S (2017) Modified carbapenem inactivation method for phenotypic detection of carbapenemase production among Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol 55(8):2321–2333
CLSI (2018) Epidemiological cutoff values for for antifungal susceptibility testing: CLSI supplement M59, 2nd edn. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne
Simner PJ, Johnson JK, Brasso WB, Anderson K, Lonsway DR, Pierce VM, Bobenchik AM, Lockett ZC, Charnot-Katsikas A, Westblade LF, Yoo BB, Jenkins SG, Limbago BM, Das S, Roe-Carpenter DE (2018) Multicenter evaluation of the modified carbapenem inactivation method and the Carba NP for detection of carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. J Clin Microbiol 56:e01369–17
Simner PJ, Opene BNA, Chambers KK, Naumann ME, Carroll KC, Tamma PD (2017) Carbapenemase detection among carbapenem-resistant glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli. J Clin Microbiol 55(9):2858–2864
Logan LK, Weinstein RA (2017) The epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: the impact and evolution of a global menace. J Infect Dis 215(suppl_1):S28–s36
CDC (2018) Carbapenemase producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CP-CRE): 2018 case definition, https://wwwncdcgov/nndss/conditions/carbapenemase-producing-carbapenem-resistant-enterobacteriaceae/case-definition/2018/ Cited June 20 2019
Coppi M, Antonelli A, Giani T, Spanu T, Liotti FM, Fontana C, Mirandola W, Gargiulo R, Barozzi A, Mauri C, Principe L, Rossolini GM (2017) Multicenter evaluation of the RAPIDEC® CARBA NP test for rapid screening of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and gram-negative nonfermenters from clinical specimens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 88(3):207–213
Hombach M, von Gunten B, Castelberg C, Bloemberg GV (2015) Evaluation of the Rapidec Carba NP test for detection of carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol 53(12):3828–3833
Dortet L, Agathine A, Naas T, Cuzon G, Poirel L, Nordmann P (2015) Evaluation of the RAPIDEC(R) CARBA NP, the Rapid CARB Screen(R) and the Carba NP test for biochemical detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. J Antimicrob Chemother 70(11):3014–3022
Garg A, Garg J, Upadhyay GC, Agarwal A, Bhattacharjee A (2015) Evaluation of the Rapidec Carba NP test kit for detection of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative Bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59(12):7870–7872
Mancini S, Kieffer N, Poirel L, Nordmann P (2017) Evaluation of the RAPIDEC(R) CARBA NP and beta-CARBA(R) tests for rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 88(4):293–297
Noel A, Huang TD, Berhin C, Hoebeke M, Bouchahrouf W, Yunus S, Bogaerts P, Glupczynski Y (2017) Comparative evaluation of four phenotypic tests for detection of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 55(2):510–518
Osterblad M, Lindholm L, Jalava J (2016) Evaluation of two commercial carbapenemase gene assays, the Rapidec Carba NP test and the in-house rapid Carba NP test, on bacterial cultures. J Antimicrob Chemother 71(7):2057–2059
Poirel L, Nordmann P (2015) Rapidec Carba NP test for rapid detection of carbapenemase producers. J Clin Microbiol 53(9):3003–3008
Queenan AM, Torres-Viera C, Gold HS, Carmeli Y, Eliopoulos GM, Moellering RC Jr, Quinn JP, Hindler J, Medeiros AA, Bush K (2000) SME-type Carbapenem-hydrolyzing class A beta-lactamases from geographically diverse Serratia marcescens strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44(11):3035–3039
Bush K, Pannell M, Lock JL, Queenan AM, Jorgensen JH, Lee RM, Lewis JS, Jarrett D (2013) Detection systems for carbapenemase gene identification should include the SME serine carbapenemase. Int J Antimicrob Agents 41(1):1–4
Decousser JW, Poirel L, Desroches M, Jayol A, Denamur E, Nordmann P (2015) Failure to detect carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli producing OXA-48-like using the Xpert Carba-R assay(R). Clin Microbiol Infect 21(2):e9–e10
Lafeuille E, Laouira S, Sougakoff W, Soulier-Escrihuela O, Leconte J, Garrec H, Tourret J, Jarlier V, Robert J (2015) Detection of OXA-48-like carbapenemase genes by the Xpert(R) Carba-R test: room for improvement. Int J Antimicrob Agents 45(4):441–442
Anandan S, Damodaran S, Gopi R, Bakthavatchalam YD, Veeraraghavan B (2015) Rapid screening for carbapenem resistant organisms: current results and future approaches. J Clin Diagn Res 9(9):Dm01–Dm03
Aktas E, Malkocoglu G, Otlu B, Copur Cicek A, Kulah C, Comert F, Sandalli C, Gursoy NC, Erdemir D, Bulut ME (2017) Evaluation of the carbapenem inactivation method for detection of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacteria in comparison with the RAPIDEC CARBA NP. Microb Drug Resist 23(4):457–461. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2016.0092
Tijet N, Patel SN, Melano RG (2016) Detection of carbapenemase activity in Enterobacteriaceae: comparison of the carbapenem inactivation method versus the Carba NP test. J Antimicrob Chemother 71(1):274–276
Thomson G, Turner D, Brasso W, Kircher S, Guillet T, Thomson K (2017) High-stringency evaluation of the automated BD Phoenix CPO detect and Rapidec Carba NP tests for detection and classification of carbapenemases. J Clin Microbiol 55(12):3437–3443
Funding
This study was funded by bioMérieux. These data were submitted to the US FDA for IVD clearance of this assay.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
A.R.M. has received speaker fees from bioMerieux, Roche and Cepheid. V.L. Speaker Fees: bioMerieux. S.S.R. has been an employee of bioMerieux since August 12, 2019. When employed at Cleveland Clinic, she received research funding from bioMerieux, BD Diagnostics, Roche, Diasorin, Accelerate, and Affinity Biosensors. C.-A.B. Consulting: Monsanto, Thermo Fisher, Research Support: Cepheid, Luminex, bioMerieux, Theravance, Aperture Bio, Speaker Fees: Bruker, BD.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Ethical approval retrospective studies
Although retrospective studies are conducted on already available data or biological material (for which formal consent may not be needed or is difficult to obtain), ethical approval may be required dependent on the law and the national ethical guidelines of a country. The authors should check with their institution to make sure they are complying with the specific requirements of their country.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 15 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McMullen, A.R., Wallace, M.A., LaBombardi, V. et al. Multicenter evaluation of the RAPIDEC® CARBA NP assay for the detection of carbapenemase production in clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 39, 2037–2044 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-03937-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-03937-1